Added: 10 months ago
From: alexanderino
Views: 1,844
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what if u marry someone that add value to u and can take care of ur sexually need! I think the problem I see in this country is that people marry base on emotion reason not on empowering each other in life,vision and goals. marriage is a good thing just be smart to choose well, an helpmate and sex mate. simple! It about a term mate!

  • expert in divorce :) ... YES

  • ... just a correction ... success has NOTHING to do with ability just opportunity or resources.

  • Marriage was successful until government/courts got involved.........

  • Govt has no business in our family affairs....If I ever get married/ceremony, it will never be registered with the county.

  • Marriage is because of money only! No one gets married because of love these days.

  • @bigal21110 I think I never get married again I just came out of a very quick one!

  • fuk this smug guy. 

  • what a twat, that bloke who say's there is evidence, fucking dillusional idiot...

    Also what a crazy fool to think that there is happiness in having another person in your life.... that's just needy and insecure...

  • @seerymseery I have more evidence in my hand concerning where life came from than that idiot will ever have concerning life beyond the body.

  • what a twat, that bloke who say's there is evidence, fucking dillusional idiot...

  • lol i love this shit

  • This is weak reasoning by Tom. Rich people get married too, and in great numbers. I'm sure that most CEO's of big corporations are married. Every rich person i've ever met was married, including ones that made their fortune before they got married for either the first or second time.

    So while it may be true that people often get married for economic reasons, it does not suggest that people who are financially secure have no need for it.

    It's a more complex issue that he is willing to admit.

  • @lamentate07 And how would he admit that the issues are more complex? Is there some magical word or phrase he should announce? Once again, an idiot is trying to stretch the show's topic-coverage to an area outside of his PRIMARY AUDIENCE. For example, if I hosted a show about firearms...I'm not going to be covering much on the topic of the material of the socks worn by the people working in the Smith/Wesson factory... Stop looking for milk in the forest.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • ugh, can you imagine marrying that first caller? No wonder she got divorced during her first marriage and im pretty sure she will get divorced again in her next marriage. Who can tolerate that?

  • What did she say at 11:27? wow, ur thick or sick or what?

  • The ONLY thing man can say that's a benefit of marriage, is that your wife can't be compelled nor forced to testify against you. So say she's the only witness to you committing a crime, you're off scot-free!

  • I love the ackward silence when he was talking with that guy lmaoo hahaha

  • That was a good one.

  • lol @ the argument with the caller

  • Men are wising up to the fact that marriage is a raw deal designed to drain their economic wealth and thwart their true life ambitions. And therefore "family values" groups want to "save marriage" via vast wealth redistribution schemes via tax abatements that punish single people. To hell with all of them. If marriage was so great, it wouldn't need constant promotion.

  • @ycdtotv Hey that's real shit... "If marriage is so great why do they promote it constantly?"

    You don't see advertising for sex (besides the subliminal messages) but you see people fucking ALL THE TIME!

    If it's so great why are so many people punishing themselves by getting a divorce (55-60%)???

  • @Lilart1981 Lilart, I want to clear a few things up. Sex *is* promoted but only in the context of selling consumer goods. Sex doesn't need to sell itself because it's a biologial urge. Marriage is a social construct, often times predicated by social pressure, fear, and ultimatums in some cases. There's nothing natural about humans having sex with one person *exclusively* throughout their natural born lives. Thanks for the reply, and peace.

  • @ycdtotv I think its a ''social construct'', u took that from Marxist and feministic philosophy, in the sense thatr is a legal contract. Otherwise, I don't see it as a ''social construct''.

  • @YoungnRomantic I suggest you study history. Through most of human existance, marriage was something done to link powerful families or to serve as a way to jump classes in western society. There's no biological urge among humans to be monogamous with only *one* person for the rest of their lives. It's totally unnatural. And in 2011, a marriage contract for a man often means a future of divorce and subsequent financial ruin. Strong and successful individuals don't need marriage.

  • @ycdtotv I agre that its a social construct in terms of legalities. That was my point. Otherwise the point that was made earlier isn't accurate.

  • Standard NAWALT bullshit from the bitch that called in.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more