@LotusReach Well, there's not such thing as free energy, but nuclear energy is pretty clean. Take a look at liquid fluoride thorium reactors if you interested in real solutions to the energy crisis.
@xaoseph There we disagree xaoseph nuclear energy is very far from clean. "No such thing as free energy" well I think that depends entirely on who is doing the deciding on that idea.
@LotusReach First let's ask what is free? Is solar energy free? No, we have to build the collectors and the turbines, very costly. Is wind free? No, we have to maintain the turbines, a dangerous job. Is wind energy clean? No smoke or mining, sure, but wind turbines kill birds and drive wildlife away. Rather than make a long winded explanation why this magnetic gear can't be used for work, I'll just ask why don't they make a little generator to present the creation of 'free energy'?
isn't it bloody disgusting! The world leaders are crying out " global warming is coming, global warming is caused by us" YET, they ARE the ones that are causing the problems with all their nuke bomb testings. They ARE the cause because we DO have free, sustainable, pollutant free energy, but they hide it from us. The BIG corporations dont want us to have it either cause then they miss out on their millions of dollars. We COULD use this same energy in cars, thus, NOT polluting the atomosphere..
OMG not that old one again! That's not free energy - it's getting energy from his hand movement. If the system is stationary then it won't work - duh! Fail!
There is no free energy in this , when the ball is moved even minutely it is off the center axis and thus being spun like a wheel on the surface of the table ... good try though, cmon boys...
@bozo2014 You can extract energy from a vacuum, but not with this device. Extracting energy from a vacuum is not free energy and does not violate any laws. Atomic matter which most physics laws are based on only contribute to 5% of all the energy in the Universe. There is a vast store of energy we can extract and there are some very impressive experiments that claim they can do it, but I still don't have a black box that can power my house yet. We might have to eliminate governments before then.
Perpetual motion is not free energy. Free energy is a bad term anyway, use the term vacuum energy. It might be possible to extract vacuum energy using magnetic field and/or electromagnetic fields, but I have yet seen any conclusive proof.
I am sure we will be able to extract vacuum energy in the very near future, I look forward it that day.
You really want to know how to advance the science of FE? Stop using magnets as your damn energy. Perpetual motion and FE are two entirely different things. When your Perpetual motion is highly flawed don't turn around and try to sell it as FE. I wished low level electromagnetic energy caused pain then we could move on to a more substantive thought process or philosophy.
this is not free energy. he's adding energy by moving the magnet wheel, the spinning ball is just following the movement. that's why they don't just set this up on a box, without the hands moving it doesn't spin. if you did create a device that did the job his hands are doing you could not generate enough energy from the spinning ball to make the device move.
most people know that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but few know the other law that energy is transferred into friction and heat.
I have done this exact setup and it doesnt work period they had another rotating magnet with a power supply. I have recreated that hypothesis and this setup doesnt work unless you inroduce a round bar magnet rotating under it which requires power input.
@slushomatic .......... Although these freaks are incorrect or just disingenuous in their defining this experiment as a free energy demonstration. You are also incorrect in your assumption that this cannot be done. Of course it can and it is not very impressive I might add. This demo is like comparing the creation of H2O to carrying a bucket of water.
This is a Hamel device - the outer ring is moved and that supplies the force to get the rotor spinning. Trouble is folks think the rotor is spinning because of the ring giving out magnetic energy (or some other BS). If you put the rotor on a proper axle it doesn't spin. Having it on a ball causes it to track around the centre of rotation as the outer ring is moved until it gets up enough speed to rotate on its axis.
Schoolboy magician stuff. Definitely not free energy.
If they made this, why isn't it on TV and haven't people tried to make this for a very, very long time? If this is true, then this should be a world-changing video
too true. We are, like solar power, just tapping into energy which is occuring naturally. The sun gives us solar power, and the world magnetic energy. Not destroying or creating it.
yes, his shaking hand is providing kinetic energy into the system. And one other thing- there is a difference between "forces" and "energy." Magnets have control over the force of magnetism, but there is no energy there. At least, no energy creation. the magnetic force has a potential energetic pull on every metal object surrounding it, but that potential energy has to later be made up for by kinetic energy. Think about it like gravity.
This demonstration passes for proof? I agree with connchri. If you were to mount the device Green is holding so that it remained stationary, eventually the spinning ball would become stationary. The natural attraction of magnetic polar opposites spins the ball. It would eventually stop. There is nothing new here, move along.
@Myxril You both can boast all you want about being engineers or physics students, I don't give a shit.
Using your occupation or current study as a means to imply further correctness on your part is as FAIL as a priest saying "But I'm a man of God, why would I ever touch little boys?"
While the implication _does_ make sense, it does not mean it is true. So if you can't 'correct me' beyond saying 'arm muscles', 'student/engineer' and 'niggerball', then shut the fuck up.
@Myxril And while I'm at it, not only did I say nothing of any sort about 'magnetic fields produce energy', the only thing I stated about magnetic fields was their effect on the magnets (as in.... moving them).
So I'd like to point that one out to salam with a big "lick my balls", for saying I was claiming that energy was 'taken' from the magnetic field, or whatever he was implying.
I lol'd, so it's all good.
Maybe when you both stop asserting onto my comments what -you- think I meant....
@Myxril ....then maybe I'll stop calling you both fucking idiots. Your knowledge on the matter means nothing to me when you can't even read what I type and take it for what it is, not what you want to make it out to be as to ad hominem my ass because you're bored.
Or feeling the need to ego-flex at me, because you're bored or pathetic, or both.
I say 'can', and you both jump on me saying that I'm saying 'are', as well as all kinds of other implications.
@Myxril@Myxril Oh, my bad, one last thing, then I'm out:
"Why don't you stick it on a frame then and prove all the peer review scientists wrong then!!??"
At 2:59 it shows the basic idea of how stationary the bottom portion would be if both pieces were mounted to a frame, with the correct setting. (Minus the wobble).
Sorry if you can't picture it in your imagination-lacking mind.
I can picture exactly what would happen, and what would not.
I think your major problem with this is that you can't differentiate between forces and energy.
Again, if this was mounted on a frame, and say a shaft was attached to the ball (lets call it the spinning top), it would not rotate. The only reason this is rotating is due to short lived initial imbalances of the magnetic field BECAUSE its not mounted on a frame
The point about the addition of energy from the demonstrators muscles is a sufficient enough explination of what is going on here. If this doesn't satisfy the "implication" that you even acknoledge makes sense then you really have not got enough understanding to voice a credible opinion.
Out of curiosity, what is your occupation?
Free speach allows us to say what we want. That goes for you too, and your entitled to your opinion. So calm the jets with hosility. I'm not telling you to shut up.
Also, comparing us to a priest is another straw man argument.
It would hold true if the priest wasn't aware of morals. That is different from knowing the morals and still touching the boys - which is the case in real life.
As a physics student, he's more than qualified. You need an understanding of this to even qualify in most cases to get into the course. And as an electrical engineer, I'd be useless if I didn't know about it.
Anyway, answer the 3Qs and I'll understand your points better.
Magnets can't be used for free energy. Simple as. For every example I have seen on youtube, I can spot the flaws in the point being made by the vid, and can explain whats happening.
You stated you have seen, and I quote, "plenty of magnetic power sources". What do you mean by this. If you mean a conventional Dynamo generator, then fine. But this does not demonstrate that. You also said that it would be free energy if it were mounted on.....
... something, and I quote again "That's why the two units need to be MOUNTED TO SOMETHING, as I mentioned, to create a stability between to two forces.
This -is- free energy."
So lets stop showing contempt for each other. So, acn you answer these then:
1) What exactly do you mean by it demonstrates free energy?
2) What do you mean by "magnets -can- be used for free energy"?
3) What is your definition of what "free energy" is?
I have a feeling a lot of people would shut the fuck up about this being such a failure, if the man was smart enough to mount the ball in some kind of lubricated housing.
To add balance. So it didn't keep falling over. I wonder why so many morons don't stop to think of how hard it'd be to balance an object in such a way, using only the influence of a magnetic field with no direct physical contact (to that which is being balanced).
If this were the answer he would demonstrate it hooked up to a little motor charging a battery or running a light bulb. A spinning top is not useful energy.
@shingwoo101 Of course a spinning top isn't useful energy. The two components aren't mounted to anything, which eliminates any attempt at stability (as well as makes it rather impossible to 'hook up' to anything to charge a battery or light a bulb).
Without stability, a spinning top is useless.
The concept he demonstrates, however, is not useless. I've seen plenty of magnetic power sources with awkward units like those he was using.
So he's smart enough to invent a "free energy machine" but can't show it without falling over.
It's quite simple how it works, there's a "down force" on the ball by the magnetic field from the magnet being pushed down from above. It's a bit like putting pressure on the side of an object then it being pushed to the side, the only difference here is the magnets stop it from moving to the side hence it spins instead (as it's N-N).
Einsteins theories are also provable. Strawman Argument.
IF IT WERE MOUNTED ONTO SOMETHING AND THERE WAS NO ADDITION ENERGY APPLIED TO THE SYSTEM (ie, the ring wasn't moved) THEN THE BALL WOULD COME TO REST!! AKA, THERE WOULD BE NO ENERGY PRODUCED!!
The only reason this demo works is because it's not mounted onto something, and the demonstrator is allowed to continually add energy to the system by moving the magnets.
The energy moving the object is coming from the man MOVING the magnetic. There is no free energy here; the magnet is being moved by the man's muscles. He isn't physically touching the object but he is transferring kinetic energy from his muscles into the object by moving it through a magnetic field.
Wow, I have absolutely no understanding about magnets and how they're used for this kind of thing. That's kindof weird considering I'm two years into a physics degree.
No. The only person who doesn't understand basic concepts regarding physics is you. Magnetic fields do not contain energy; they exert a force on objects that are moving through them. However the energy does not come from the magnetic field; it comes from the motion of the object.
You seriously don't have a clue do you. If you remove his muscles from the system, and useda fixed frame, there will be nothing to add energy to the system, and the magnets won't rotate!!
I second this, I was going to reply myself, but this myself, but were obviously dealing with a dude whos educated himself through youtube and believes in the conspiracy that governments are holding back some free energy technology, as theres proof of every conspiracy theory going online.
I think, judging by the tone of your post, you know that you've got it wrong but you're too embarrassed to take it back, especially after this childish ranting.
This man is moving the magnetic field with his arm, and the energy from this movement is what is producing the motion on the object. There's a reason everyone is saying this; because it's basic physics. There is nothing happening in this video that shouldn't happen; there is no free energy being generated.
The tone of my post? Do you hear text, now? Let me guess, you also see speech.
All you're doing is pointing out the obvious to me; he's holding the top set of magnets, and he's trying to stabilize them to make the bottom set of magnets rotate without falling over.
DUH. This isn't brain surgery.
And I didn't say this video showed free energy being generated. Now you're just grasping for straws.
Holy shit, do you fail.
Reread my comments, then slap yourself. I'm done with you. :)
You're deliberately misunderstanding what I'm saying.
What you are seeing in this video is not free energy. Nothing is happening. This video is no different to a man poking a spinning top with his finger.
Nothing needs to be mounted on a frame. Nothing needs to be changed because there's nothing here out of the ordinary; this is a man moving a piece of magnetic material with a magnet.
And his muscle is moving the magnet (it's not levitating is it?).
I'm not deliberately misunderstanding anything. Your the one who lacks the capacity to clearly state what the fuck it is you're trying to make a point/statement about.
This is a demonstration on the basic idea of free energy; a moving part that require no energy source, that can be used to generate energy.
You are the one deliberately misunderstanding me, and in the process, trying to put your own assertions into my words.
See this is exactly the issue; so far at least 3 people have tried to show you that this does not demonstrate a moving part that requires no energy source.
There is an energy source for all the movement in this video. The energy source is the man's arm; respiration is occurring in the mitochondria in his cells, which allows his muscles to extend to move the magnetic field over the object, and the energy from this movement is what is being transferred into the spinning top!
Then can you make it clear to us then exactly how he is demonstrating this idea of free energy from magnets? Because from his video he is not demonstrating anything that isn't already known in science. There's absolutely nothing new here. The only thing I can get out of this is that he may have some idea as to how to reinvent the Dynamo. Lol, and thats hardly free energy!
See it in terms of energy. The man's arm is the "battery" powering the system. As you saw, when the object was on the table outside of the object's effective magnetic field it wasn't moving. Then the man's arm began to move the magnetic field, putting energy into the system. The nature of a magnetic field is to transfer energy from its own motion into the motion of magnetic materials, and this is precisely what it did; energy flowed from arm to field to object.
Just give up. You keep prattling on, pointing out what I already know, then jump to my implication that magnets -can- be used as free energy, but spin it off as I'm literally saying about the vid: magnets -are being- used as free energy.
Just fucking give up. You're just failing, bro. Failing.
I haven't changed my mind. I hope you understand how delusional you're being.
But go on, continue to think that I'm claiming a man holding a set of magnets equates free energy. Continue to think that my comments somehow culminate to "I believe in perpetual motion machines".
Continue to think that you need to talk to me like an unperceptive child, telling me what's being moved, what's taking in air, what cells are doing, etc. (when all of that is already understood).
Well, I gave you everything you needed to make an informed decision and you decided not to. The only thing left to do is tell you that you really are a gullible dipshit.
You didn't give me anything that wasn't already known from watching the video.
You've only been trying to pull this stupid ad hominem bullshit this whole time, and your resorting to taking almost an hour just to basically say I'm a gullible dipshit for not bowing to your words. And I'm also a fag.
Wow. *applauds* Congrats.
I already went over your assertions and lack of reading what someone types. The only thing left to do is for you to go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself.
Was it that hard to say? Could you have just said that to begin with, to make your intentions clear as to you wanting to claim I'm an idiot?
Was there really any need for you to treat me like a kid, describe what I saw in the vid; as well as the energy-consuming processes involved; then claim my general comments about potential free energy were literal statements of 'this vid demonstrates working free energy'?
I actually treated you like an adult to begin with. When you refused to learn or even examine an opposing point of view despite your entire opinion being based on a fundamental misunderstanding of basic science you became a child, and I began calling you a homo.
Say that to my face and I'll kill you. I don't give a fuck. :)
You're still going on about this? You still don't get that I said magnets can be used for free energy?
Of course you don't get it. Because this whole time you've been saying that I'm saying energy is taken out of a magnetic field, and that this man is creating energy in this vid. Despite the fact that I didn't say such things, nor do I believe them to be true.
Your a right cheeky git. I wonder if you'd be as brave to say this sort of thing to someone in person, coz I tell you what, I'd not take long cutting you down to size!
You continue to do the same as salamirterra. I've only stated that magnets can be used for free energy. I've seen it done in other vids on here, but apparently you're too smart to fucking find them. XD
Anyhow, that's all I was pointing out, but salamirterra had to go and say that I was saying that free energy was being made in the video.
I'd be brave enough to say this to anyone's face. Cut me down to size? Ooooo, internet bad ass.
Although the fact that a man who is clearly mystified by magnetic fields and who is claiming that magnets can generate free energy is accusing me, a physics student, of not knowing enough about physics to comprehend the awesome complexity of a man waving a magnet at a piece of copper is not lost on me ;)
I don't give a fuck what kind of student you are. You don't have to be a student to be able to learn whatever you want to learn. Narrow-minded and shallow, you are. Doesn't surprise me.
I'm done with you, now, since you're resorting to the "physics student" card to try and shoulder me out of the way.
I won't make the comment about your statement implying that every bit of material I've read or watched on the subject is now discredited, simply because I'm not a physics student.
I haven't resorted to any card. In fact quite the opposite; I am trying to teach you precisely what is happening here. I haven't become insulting like you have, and I mentioned the fact I was a physics student completely outside of any actual claims I've made regarding physics.
I have not, at any point, used the fact I am studying physics as "proof" I am right. I have calmly explained to you the error in your claims and you've chosen to call me names and create straw-man arguments.
"I didn't say this video showed free energy being generated."
Yes you did, you implied it in your replys to my post.
Your awful good at insulting are you not? I understand it must be hard being a high school drop out. Because you sure as hell haven't got a high school understanding of whats really going on here.
Then enlighting us. What is required to draw "free energy". There will not be a solution that you could think of that I could not explain. And btw, the difference is that Einstein was smart. This guy sure as hell isn't, so I still fail to see your initial point on "shooting down" my comment.
Like I said, if this was mounted onto something, it wouldn't rotate.
I'm an electrical engineer, who's worked on a lot of generators, so I'm pretty well versed in electromagnetic theory.
N4CR5, electrons don't spin in the sense you're talking about. "Spin" is a word used to explain the concepts, but there's no actual spinning going on. And there's no perpetual motion in electrons, of course.
KBendix: Sure. Free energy from outside sources (solar power, for example) is quite reasonable. But this video is claiming the energy comes from the earth's magnetic field, which is incorrect.
Science book? Science books don't explain everything. There can be some external energy source what you can't find in science books. Free energy doesn't mean creating energy... it means that you can get energy for free... ...from some external source... ... ...by using some free energy devices.
Magnetism is explained very well in science books. as well as thermodynamics. and psychology books explain very well how do make the monkeys scream - by showing them a turd and telling them its a banana. he takes more time running around than actually showing his experiment, guess why.
Magnetism is explained as it. That doesn't men magnetism can't be involved in free energy.
Find more about solar wind and similar energy forms, what we can't "see" that well yet. Stan Deyo talks about that in his Roswell lecture. It's not "free"... what means that you can't create energy from nothing, but you can get it for free.
Turn solar wind, heat, light or anything else that is around us in usable energy... for free.
we can "see" solar wind. Or detect it and map it anyway.
We also know how much useful energy is in it, and trust me, it's far from as efficeient and economical as todays generating methods. Questionable even if we have the engineering ability.
And it's not spinning very well, at that. It would be a far more efficient use of "hand power" for him to just spin the thing like a top and do away with the smoke screen of magnets.
No, it's not tapping into the "earth's magnetic field". The earth's magnetic field is millions of times smaller than the magnets he's moving around with his hand. If it were "tapping into" any source of power outside his hand motion, then it should spin without him holding the magnets. It's spinning because he's moving his hand, which also has far more energy than the earth's magnetic field exerts on the experiment. When he stops moving his hand, the effect stops.
Bad video on the device he's got at the end. It's jumpy so you can't see the spin of the magnets slowing down, plus he doesn't leave the device run for very long. Even on the first part of the video the device is not shown running for long enough for the fields to find their balance point.
Permanent magnets will always find an equilibrium. I'm going to take the time to draw out the magnetic fields in this configuration to prove (to myself) that it won't work for long enough to be of any use.
vertigo502 , it is free energy if you do not pay for the electricity that it produces. For example my energy bill (electricity bill) is $170 because my air conditioner runs all damn day long. It's 107* out side I hate heat. This Idea is a great way to get someone like me off grid and the Government cant tax the hell out what they have no control over.
Free energy is available today - by using solar PV panels! These should work pretty well with air conditioners. In Europe and the UK, you can sell any excess electricity you generate back to the grid for a premium price.
That is priceless energy, but not 'free' energy. Free energy is when nothing is being turned into energy. The sun is an energy source so solar energy is different
A couple of months ago Kbendix wrote: "Free energy doesn't mean creating energy... it means that you can get energy for free... ...from some external source.."
That sounds like solar and wind to me ;-)
I wonder why someone voted down my previous comment??
The problem with want to be scientists is that sometimey they can't see the forest for the trees. Assume for a second that this concept of magnetic power can generate electricity for 1/1000 the cost of today's electricity. These scientists would still be trying to make the point that it is not free energy therefore the science is right and the idea is defunct. Get my point here? The question is not about free energy, but is it possible to get much cheaper and greener energy?
then we could think how we can improve it, for exmple construct a motor and make the stator magnet moving/vibrating by means of attaching it to a string or something like that,see also the respons video its better, but he must move the outer magnet so that it going to continue rotating. the other problem is how to make it rotate faster. lets try to help them first instead of criticizing maybe they are right, lets find a way how to solve the prblem, dont just follow to wat already existed rules
...but it stopped! It stopped. Why not make a frame for it to hold the pieces steady and let it spin for the duration of your explanation? It can't be THAT hard to make a little frame, right?
This works because it is not stable, because it is continually falling around the circle, because it is OFF BALANCE..... put this on a shaft, and it won't work.... I tried.....
I can see this being applied to a motor to induce voltage. it is essentially mutual induction. Same Principal as is used in transformers. Nice place to start. Thanks for the video.
This thing works because he's using magnets and motion. The motion of his hands, including the falling of the hub keeps the magnetic fields fluctuating. Otherwise this device would not work because the fields don't fluctuate.
How come he didn't secure the ring and put the center piece on a hub, such as using the bearing on a hard drive (with relatively low friction)? Because the device will not spin for long, that's why.
make me speechless by having this rotation produce more energy than the amount of energy it takes to make the magnets strong enough to do real work(produce energy).still a good way to get uneducated investors to hand over checks I guess.
The laws of Thermodynamics were written by man. Just as man once thought that we were the center of the universe, and was subsequently proven wrong, It is my thought that these laws will, eventually, be proven wrong as well.
The energy to spin the bottom rotor comes from the magnetic forces of the top ring. The energy in the top ring comes from the person's muscles. If you consider muscle power as free, then this is indeed free energy.
Mr. Nikola Tesla stated that one day man kind would connect his machinery to the driving force of the Universe. I hope that he is right.
You use energy to move your muscles, unfortunately... And even if you didn't, those muscles would eventually die, as all organic living things do. If this was your point, I agree with you.
However, to say that this is 'Free Energy', consider that it violates the first law of thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transferred and converted. In this case, the man's rotating the ring around the ball, using energy from his body to move the ring.
i guess you could call this 'free energy.' It's actually already used in many motors. Take apart a an electric drill-same thing but with electromagnets, obviously so you can turn it on/off.
Unfortunately, this is video and its message are useless. In order to get anything worthwhile, one would need some huge ass magnets which are expensive as hell. sorry to burst you bubble, bro
as far as i know ezeik is more accurate than master.....the principle of uncertainity deals with quantum physics and not newtonian physics....all it says is that the position of a particle and its velocity cant be calculated accurately at the same time....u cud b accurate with one but the other one will be inaccurate......
IDIOTS !... If the magnet was held in place and the "toy" put underneath..it would not keep spinning. You have to move the top magnent in order for the "toy" to spin. This means that the energy is coming from your hand.
Also...even if it would spin forever...it is not doing any work. As soon as you hook up the "toy" to a device that does some kind of work, it will eventually stop working without an external force.
If this device, once initiated will "revolve perpetually", then why didn't they set it all up before the lecture? If they had, at least people could see that it had been revolving for at least several minutes on it's own without continual hand movements. As it is, it is just a toy, as he said in the video. This demo only serves to create ridicule on the whole topic of alternative energy sources and the other topics he talks about. That's more interesting imo...
...following on from the previous comment. Do you think there really is only one way to move a car from A to B? Oil giants say it is only allowed to be achieved using the combustion engine, powered by their expensive profit-generating oil. Wake up folks! Movement can be harnessed using other physical laws, not just those exploited by oil bosses. Most of the negative comments, debunking inspirational videos in YouTube are likely posted by feds, paid to protect the singular way of motion. THINK!!!
Like electricity and solar energy, not on unicorns or any other kind of fables.
People make this conspiracy theorys to apeal to your ignorance and make a profit out of it.
If what they say was truth, why would engineers even bother to make enignes more enficient, consuming less then half then what it was done befor? Or why does every kind of machin today consumes less then half of the energy then befor? Or why has it been so much investment in new energy research, solar, hidric, nuclear?
Let's not be too dumb here people! He's not generating free energy - nooooo. He's harnessing energy from all around us. He's using magnetic force (something naturally present in our planet) and metal shapes (also naturally present on the good mother ship we ride) together in a clever way. If you put two like-poles together, they repel. Stick wheels on and you get motion. Not creating energy, just harnessing it, right? This is exactly what the video shows. Attraction/repulsion. Natural earth!
this is such a hoax, this guy did not demonstrate free enegry, free enegry does not exist, what he demonstarted was how a Electric Motor works, thats all a motor is, is that. we will never ever have free enegry, you can never get more enegry out of a machine then what you put in it.
I agree, you cant have free energy!!!!! this is imposible!! this is just magnetic flux, AC motors and DC motors work this way. In fact the generators that produces the electricity you use in your house uses this magnetic theory.
How do you figure that it is not possible to use magnetic force to generate mechanical movement and electrical energy? Have you experimented yourself? If you look deep enough you will find some amazing and inspiring over unity generators which have even received media attention (whether that is good or not is a different issue..)
How do you figure out?.. The answer is simple, "Education" and quite frankly you never had one on the matter to have a saying.
And yes it is an hoax, there is no such thing has machins runing indefinitively whitout imput no matter how you do it or how hard you try. AND IT CAN BE MATHEMATICALY PROVEN SO! The only way I could be wrong is if 1+1 is not 2.
Maybe the education system is designed so rigidly as to make us think in certain mechanical ways - greatly reducing the possibility of any advancements which could free us from the current energy situation. Search "double slit experiment" and you will discover that the linear, rational way of "thinking" doesn't hold up throughout our multi-dimensional universe.
omg how can people think like this.... so the school says "theres no such ting as free energy, (the laws of thermodynamics) " and you say "they are wrong they say that so the oil companies can make more money" please jaj :)
I don't quite know about science, but I think, and correct me if i'm wrong, that what he is saying is that it is free in terms of monetary value. Of course excluding the ones that are use for purchasing the necessary materials.
mm not quite like that, the term means that the amount of work produced by a machine is more than the work that you use to make it work, wich is IMPOSIBLE just for the simple fact that physic laws exist. The term its not well used here, free energy does not exist, the cool thing about his experiment is that you dont need electricity to make it spin, but it doesnt mean that theres not work involved.
@MasterGhostKnight: There are another ways in which you can be wrong. Most importantly, it's not mathematically proven but it has been shown/demonstrated. Our "laws of physics" have changed through time. We try to use the best knowledge available, but we still learn more every day.
You see that is where you go wrong. because you don't have an education you don't know what are you talking about.
1. The double slit experiment was first described in theory and only afterwards observed.
2. What you didn't knew was that energy comes from a mathematical concept. So when it comes down to energy it is not a case of possibility or an alternative way, it just is because mathematics is absolut!
We are limited by our beliefs. Consciousness creates the reality we experience. You will not see it, until you believe it. If you stand resolute with the restrictions you have been taught, you will not discover anything new. Think outside the box, the universe is magic.
That is absolutly incorrect. What things are doesn't depend of what you think of it, they just are. You can argue whit math a say that 1+1 is not 2, but no matter how much you argue 1+1 will allways be 2. It is not about belif, math doesn't depend of anything in the real world, however if you find something in the real world that can be expressed mathematicaly it will invariably act acording to it. If you have 1 sheep in one place and 1 somewhere else the total of sheep will allways be 2.
p.s. dont start crapping on about "why would engineers do this and why wouldnt they do that if so and so..." U dont know what engineers HAVE and HAVNT done! All u know is what they show u...........what is out on the market! Who are companies ultimately controled by??.........THE GOVERNMENT (corruption and evilness). Man i dont know what to believe anymore, help a brother out o_O
This Free Energy Demo video is just awesome..
Are you want to get Plans for the Magnetic Generator / Tesla Generator
Then please go to Google and give a Search for "Best Magnetic Generator Review"
Choose the First Results (Ignore the Advertisements)
JackSmith898989 2 weeks ago
Bye bye nuclear power plants. Hello free clean energy.
LotusReach 3 weeks ago
@LotusReach Well, there's not such thing as free energy, but nuclear energy is pretty clean. Take a look at liquid fluoride thorium reactors if you interested in real solutions to the energy crisis.
xaoseph 9 hours ago
@xaoseph There we disagree xaoseph nuclear energy is very far from clean. "No such thing as free energy" well I think that depends entirely on who is doing the deciding on that idea.
LotusReach 9 hours ago
@LotusReach First let's ask what is free? Is solar energy free? No, we have to build the collectors and the turbines, very costly. Is wind free? No, we have to maintain the turbines, a dangerous job. Is wind energy clean? No smoke or mining, sure, but wind turbines kill birds and drive wildlife away. Rather than make a long winded explanation why this magnetic gear can't be used for work, I'll just ask why don't they make a little generator to present the creation of 'free energy'?
xaoseph 9 hours ago
@HansumRob100 i tried to find it, but couldnt. could you send me a link please? :)
MrSquareyez 1 month ago
The oil corporations deserve to fail.
Edoshmek 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
- This is a nice Video - but ...
- If you want to get the Magnetic-Generator Plans
- Go to Google and search for "Best Magnetic Generator Review"
- Click the First result (Skip the Advertisements)
subhankarwork 2 months ago
f**k the govenrments and the power and oil corporations!!! Greedy bastards. It's THEIR fault we are messin the planet up, NOT OURS!
MrSquareyez 2 months ago 3
@MrSquareyez HAVE U SEEN A DOCUMENTRY CALLED 'THRIVE... WATCH IT IF U HAVNT... PRETTY AWESOME STUFF
HansumRob100 2 months ago 2
isn't it bloody disgusting! The world leaders are crying out " global warming is coming, global warming is caused by us" YET, they ARE the ones that are causing the problems with all their nuke bomb testings. They ARE the cause because we DO have free, sustainable, pollutant free energy, but they hide it from us. The BIG corporations dont want us to have it either cause then they miss out on their millions of dollars. We COULD use this same energy in cars, thus, NOT polluting the atomosphere..
MrSquareyez 2 months ago
Weird... magnets create free energy?
lluke9 3 months ago
Now u just have to built one the size of Jupiter in order to have a big 100 wattas of power !
tubeseek41 3 months ago
OMG not that old one again! That's not free energy - it's getting energy from his hand movement. If the system is stationary then it won't work - duh! Fail!
sorova 4 months ago
fake it turns by the friction of the table.....
panoarturo1 5 months ago
U JELLY SCIENCEFAGS?!
Electric companies will go bankrupt.
AnonymousJustified 7 months ago
@CravattEnterprises tell us more ?
steffyweffy777 9 months ago
good job were on the way
poofer16 10 months ago
i built one and it didn't work. although i could move my hand enough to do what he does in the video.
bthegood 11 months ago
There is no free energy in this , when the ball is moved even minutely it is off the center axis and thus being spun like a wheel on the surface of the table ... good try though, cmon boys...
429hydroman 11 months ago
@bozo2014 You can extract energy from a vacuum, but not with this device. Extracting energy from a vacuum is not free energy and does not violate any laws. Atomic matter which most physics laws are based on only contribute to 5% of all the energy in the Universe. There is a vast store of energy we can extract and there are some very impressive experiments that claim they can do it, but I still don't have a black box that can power my house yet. We might have to eliminate governments before then.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
Perpetual motion is not free energy. Free energy is a bad term anyway, use the term vacuum energy. It might be possible to extract vacuum energy using magnetic field and/or electromagnetic fields, but I have yet seen any conclusive proof.
I am sure we will be able to extract vacuum energy in the very near future, I look forward it that day.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
You really want to know how to advance the science of FE? Stop using magnets as your damn energy. Perpetual motion and FE are two entirely different things. When your Perpetual motion is highly flawed don't turn around and try to sell it as FE. I wished low level electromagnetic energy caused pain then we could move on to a more substantive thought process or philosophy.
TimHaskins 1 year ago
Free energy is energy for free. Means you don't need to pay for it. Steal 'em and you got it for free, right? :)
Sorry, bad joke :(
boobiestrap 1 year ago
i can only imagine the shit that Rudolf Diesel had t put up with,,, no matter what, its an idea.. come up with a better one or stfu
pkqkennywood 1 year ago
this is not free energy. he's adding energy by moving the magnet wheel, the spinning ball is just following the movement. that's why they don't just set this up on a box, without the hands moving it doesn't spin. if you did create a device that did the job his hands are doing you could not generate enough energy from the spinning ball to make the device move.
most people know that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but few know the other law that energy is transferred into friction and heat.
jwallbanger 1 year ago
I have done this exact setup and it doesnt work period they had another rotating magnet with a power supply. I have recreated that hypothesis and this setup doesnt work unless you inroduce a round bar magnet rotating under it which requires power input.
slushomatic 1 year ago
@slushomatic .......... Although these freaks are incorrect or just disingenuous in their defining this experiment as a free energy demonstration. You are also incorrect in your assumption that this cannot be done. Of course it can and it is not very impressive I might add. This demo is like comparing the creation of H2O to carrying a bucket of water.
TimHaskins 1 year ago
@bozo2014 Laws were meant to be broken
Thailandsuay 1 year ago
The energy already exists within the magnets.
kuei1248 1 year ago
This is a Hamel device - the outer ring is moved and that supplies the force to get the rotor spinning. Trouble is folks think the rotor is spinning because of the ring giving out magnetic energy (or some other BS). If you put the rotor on a proper axle it doesn't spin. Having it on a ball causes it to track around the centre of rotation as the outer ring is moved until it gets up enough speed to rotate on its axis.
Schoolboy magician stuff. Definitely not free energy.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
yes, but what if we used an energy that we can't use and has no effect on the enviroment?
Braken101 1 year ago
If they made this, why isn't it on TV and haven't people tried to make this for a very, very long time? If this is true, then this should be a world-changing video
vladimir0B 1 year ago
beacuse then world electric and oil companies would lose a lot of money and that is not in their interest so they control media and laws
tomislav5555 1 year ago
too true. We are, like solar power, just tapping into energy which is occuring naturally. The sun gives us solar power, and the world magnetic energy. Not destroying or creating it.
2020production 1 year ago
This is such a crock of shit. The "energy" to move the wheel is coming from his hands as he chases it around the table.
100% baloney.
mandolinic 1 year ago
yes, his shaking hand is providing kinetic energy into the system. And one other thing- there is a difference between "forces" and "energy." Magnets have control over the force of magnetism, but there is no energy there. At least, no energy creation. the magnetic force has a potential energetic pull on every metal object surrounding it, but that potential energy has to later be made up for by kinetic energy. Think about it like gravity.
TectonaRivv 1 year ago
Comment removed
TectonaRivv 1 year ago
doesn't work if the wheel with magnets is stationary. make the experience and see for yourself
jotacril 2 years ago 2
@jotacril ur wrong i did it works
poofer16 10 months ago
@jotacril you nailed it buddy!! the fact that his he moves the magnets closer to the wheel does the work.
458user 3 months ago
This demonstration passes for proof? I agree with connchri. If you were to mount the device Green is holding so that it remained stationary, eventually the spinning ball would become stationary. The natural attraction of magnetic polar opposites spins the ball. It would eventually stop. There is nothing new here, move along.
doverlin 2 years ago 2
New comment thread to connchri and salamirterra, spelling out what I said, and how you they didn't read me correctly.
I stated magnets -can- be used for free energy (I'm not talking zero-point energy, before either of you get snippy with me).
I did not say this vid is showing the creation of free energy; I said it was a very rough, unfinished demo of the -idea- of how it would work.
I'm aware of what's 'really' going on in this vid, so shut the fuck up about arm muscles. XD
Myxril 2 years ago
@Myxril You both can boast all you want about being engineers or physics students, I don't give a shit.
Using your occupation or current study as a means to imply further correctness on your part is as FAIL as a priest saying "But I'm a man of God, why would I ever touch little boys?"
While the implication _does_ make sense, it does not mean it is true. So if you can't 'correct me' beyond saying 'arm muscles', 'student/engineer' and 'niggerball', then shut the fuck up.
Myxril 2 years ago
@Myxril And while I'm at it, not only did I say nothing of any sort about 'magnetic fields produce energy', the only thing I stated about magnetic fields was their effect on the magnets (as in.... moving them).
So I'd like to point that one out to salam with a big "lick my balls", for saying I was claiming that energy was 'taken' from the magnetic field, or whatever he was implying.
I lol'd, so it's all good.
Maybe when you both stop asserting onto my comments what -you- think I meant....
Myxril 2 years ago
@Myxril ....then maybe I'll stop calling you both fucking idiots. Your knowledge on the matter means nothing to me when you can't even read what I type and take it for what it is, not what you want to make it out to be as to ad hominem my ass because you're bored.
Or feeling the need to ego-flex at me, because you're bored or pathetic, or both.
I say 'can', and you both jump on me saying that I'm saying 'are', as well as all kinds of other implications.
So shut the fuck up and leave me be. :)
Myxril 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Myxril @Myxril Oh, my bad, one last thing, then I'm out:
"Why don't you stick it on a frame then and prove all the peer review scientists wrong then!!??"
At 2:59 it shows the basic idea of how stationary the bottom portion would be if both pieces were mounted to a frame, with the correct setting. (Minus the wobble).
Sorry if you can't picture it in your imagination-lacking mind.
I'd rather be a smart ass than a dumb ass.
Myxril 2 years ago
Comment removed
connchri 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This does not show what it would be like at all.
I can picture exactly what would happen, and what would not.
I think your major problem with this is that you can't differentiate between forces and energy.
Again, if this was mounted on a frame, and say a shaft was attached to the ball (lets call it the spinning top), it would not rotate. The only reason this is rotating is due to short lived initial imbalances of the magnetic field BECAUSE its not mounted on a frame
connchri 2 years ago
The point about the addition of energy from the demonstrators muscles is a sufficient enough explination of what is going on here. If this doesn't satisfy the "implication" that you even acknoledge makes sense then you really have not got enough understanding to voice a credible opinion.
Out of curiosity, what is your occupation?
Free speach allows us to say what we want. That goes for you too, and your entitled to your opinion. So calm the jets with hosility. I'm not telling you to shut up.
connchri 2 years ago
Also, comparing us to a priest is another straw man argument.
It would hold true if the priest wasn't aware of morals. That is different from knowing the morals and still touching the boys - which is the case in real life.
As a physics student, he's more than qualified. You need an understanding of this to even qualify in most cases to get into the course. And as an electrical engineer, I'd be useless if I didn't know about it.
Anyway, answer the 3Qs and I'll understand your points better.
connchri 2 years ago
Then I completely don't get your point.
Magnets can't be used for free energy. Simple as. For every example I have seen on youtube, I can spot the flaws in the point being made by the vid, and can explain whats happening.
You stated you have seen, and I quote, "plenty of magnetic power sources". What do you mean by this. If you mean a conventional Dynamo generator, then fine. But this does not demonstrate that. You also said that it would be free energy if it were mounted on.....
connchri 2 years ago
... something, and I quote again "That's why the two units need to be MOUNTED TO SOMETHING, as I mentioned, to create a stability between to two forces.
This -is- free energy."
So lets stop showing contempt for each other. So, acn you answer these then:
1) What exactly do you mean by it demonstrates free energy?
2) What do you mean by "magnets -can- be used for free energy"?
3) What is your definition of what "free energy" is?
I appologise if I haven't understood you so far.
connchri 2 years ago
I have a feeling a lot of people would shut the fuck up about this being such a failure, if the man was smart enough to mount the ball in some kind of lubricated housing.
To add balance. So it didn't keep falling over. I wonder why so many morons don't stop to think of how hard it'd be to balance an object in such a way, using only the influence of a magnetic field with no direct physical contact (to that which is being balanced).
Myxril 2 years ago
If this were the answer he would demonstrate it hooked up to a little motor charging a battery or running a light bulb. A spinning top is not useful energy.
shingwoo101 2 years ago
@shingwoo101 Of course a spinning top isn't useful energy. The two components aren't mounted to anything, which eliminates any attempt at stability (as well as makes it rather impossible to 'hook up' to anything to charge a battery or light a bulb).
Without stability, a spinning top is useless.
The concept he demonstrates, however, is not useless. I've seen plenty of magnetic power sources with awkward units like those he was using.
And they've either powered a battery or a bulb.
Myxril 2 years ago
@Myxril
Can you perhaps give a source for these examples you have seen?
connchri 2 years ago
@Myxril
So he's smart enough to invent a "free energy machine" but can't show it without falling over.
It's quite simple how it works, there's a "down force" on the ball by the magnetic field from the magnet being pushed down from above. It's a bit like putting pressure on the side of an object then it being pushed to the side, the only difference here is the magnets stop it from moving to the side hence it spins instead (as it's N-N).
No energy is created, hence it's not free!
connchri 2 years ago
"So he's smart enough to invent a "free energy machine" but can't show it without falling over."
Einstein had shitty grades in school. What's your point?
Notice that it's a demo. Not a finished product.
Of course there's a 'down force' on the ball; the magnets on top are being pushed down against it from the other magnetic field.
I'm not stupid. XD
That's why the two units need to be MOUNTED TO SOMETHING, as I mentioned, to create a stability between to two forces.
This -is- free energy. :)
Myxril 2 years ago
Einsteins theories are also provable. Strawman Argument.
IF IT WERE MOUNTED ONTO SOMETHING AND THERE WAS NO ADDITION ENERGY APPLIED TO THE SYSTEM (ie, the ring wasn't moved) THEN THE BALL WOULD COME TO REST!! AKA, THERE WOULD BE NO ENERGY PRODUCED!!
The only reason this demo works is because it's not mounted onto something, and the demonstrator is allowed to continually add energy to the system by moving the magnets.
Get real. Even better, get a physics degree!
connchri 2 years ago
There's no Strawman going on with the Einstein thing. I was shooting your "smart enough" comment down.
You keep assuming that this guy is wielding a finished product to demonstrate to potential buyers, or something.
Understand that it's definitely nowhere near finished, so trying to yell about whether it creates energy or not is moot.
You obviously don't know what's required to draw FREE ENERGY from the use of magnets, but you sure know how to troll.
Get lost. Even better, shut the fuck up!
Myxril 2 years ago
Comment removed
salamirterra 2 years ago
Comment removed
salamirterra 2 years ago
Look this is simple.
The energy moving the object is coming from the man MOVING the magnetic. There is no free energy here; the magnet is being moved by the man's muscles. He isn't physically touching the object but he is transferring kinetic energy from his muscles into the object by moving it through a magnetic field.
There is no free energy.
salamirterra 2 years ago
Yet another person who doesn't understand a fucking thing about magnets, and how they produce FREE ENERGY.
Magnetic force is moving the magnets, moron. Now the man. He's only holding the top portion because NEITHER PIECE IS MOUNTED ON ANYTHING.
Go browse YouTube, for fuck's sake. You have absolutely no understanding about magnets and how they're used for this kind of thing.
"the magnet is being moved by the man's muscles." EPIC FAIL AT INTELLIGENCE.
Myxril 2 years ago
Wow, I have absolutely no understanding about magnets and how they're used for this kind of thing. That's kindof weird considering I'm two years into a physics degree.
No. The only person who doesn't understand basic concepts regarding physics is you. Magnetic fields do not contain energy; they exert a force on objects that are moving through them. However the energy does not come from the magnetic field; it comes from the motion of the object.
salamirterra 2 years ago
"Magnetic fields do not contain energy; they exert a force on objects that are moving through them."
That's what I fucking said! In reply to you saying it was HIS MUSCLE'S MOVING THE MAGNET, you fucking bafoon! XD
"However the energy does not come from the magnetic field; it comes from the motion of the object."
Hence the reason to MOUNT THE MAGNETS TO A FRAME. They remain in a precise stationary position, and the MAGNETIC FIELD moves the magnets!
ROFL
Two years in physics, my ball sack. XD
Myxril 2 years ago
You seriously don't have a clue do you. If you remove his muscles from the system, and useda fixed frame, there will be nothing to add energy to the system, and the magnets won't rotate!!
connchri 2 years ago 2
I second this, I was going to reply myself, but this myself, but were obviously dealing with a dude whos educated himself through youtube and believes in the conspiracy that governments are holding back some free energy technology, as theres proof of every conspiracy theory going online.
connchri 2 years ago
*facepalm*
I think, judging by the tone of your post, you know that you've got it wrong but you're too embarrassed to take it back, especially after this childish ranting.
This man is moving the magnetic field with his arm, and the energy from this movement is what is producing the motion on the object. There's a reason everyone is saying this; because it's basic physics. There is nothing happening in this video that shouldn't happen; there is no free energy being generated.
salamirterra 2 years ago 2
The tone of my post? Do you hear text, now? Let me guess, you also see speech.
All you're doing is pointing out the obvious to me; he's holding the top set of magnets, and he's trying to stabilize them to make the bottom set of magnets rotate without falling over.
DUH. This isn't brain surgery.
And I didn't say this video showed free energy being generated. Now you're just grasping for straws.
Holy shit, do you fail.
Reread my comments, then slap yourself. I'm done with you. :)
Myxril 2 years ago
You're deliberately misunderstanding what I'm saying.
What you are seeing in this video is not free energy. Nothing is happening. This video is no different to a man poking a spinning top with his finger.
Nothing needs to be mounted on a frame. Nothing needs to be changed because there's nothing here out of the ordinary; this is a man moving a piece of magnetic material with a magnet.
And his muscle is moving the magnet (it's not levitating is it?).
salamirterra 2 years ago 2
I'm not deliberately misunderstanding anything. Your the one who lacks the capacity to clearly state what the fuck it is you're trying to make a point/statement about.
This is a demonstration on the basic idea of free energy; a moving part that require no energy source, that can be used to generate energy.
You are the one deliberately misunderstanding me, and in the process, trying to put your own assertions into my words.
Myxril 2 years ago
See this is exactly the issue; so far at least 3 people have tried to show you that this does not demonstrate a moving part that requires no energy source.
There is an energy source for all the movement in this video. The energy source is the man's arm; respiration is occurring in the mitochondria in his cells, which allows his muscles to extend to move the magnetic field over the object, and the energy from this movement is what is being transferred into the spinning top!
salamirterra 2 years ago
Once again, I never said this video demonstrated a finished product. I've made this comment many fucking times already, you dimwitted piece of trash.
He is DEMONSTRATING the IDEA of using MAGNETS as the source of free energy. Durpa dur.
That does not imply that him holding it is FREE ENERGY. That is why it would have to be mounted, as I keep saying. DURPA DUR.
You keep rehashing the obvious in regards to the man holding the magnets, and spin it off as me saying -that- is free energy.
Myxril 2 years ago
Then can you make it clear to us then exactly how he is demonstrating this idea of free energy from magnets? Because from his video he is not demonstrating anything that isn't already known in science. There's absolutely nothing new here. The only thing I can get out of this is that he may have some idea as to how to reinvent the Dynamo. Lol, and thats hardly free energy!
connchri 2 years ago
See it in terms of energy. The man's arm is the "battery" powering the system. As you saw, when the object was on the table outside of the object's effective magnetic field it wasn't moving. Then the man's arm began to move the magnetic field, putting energy into the system. The nature of a magnetic field is to transfer energy from its own motion into the motion of magnetic materials, and this is precisely what it did; energy flowed from arm to field to object.
No energy was made, some was lost
salamirterra 2 years ago
Just give up. You keep prattling on, pointing out what I already know, then jump to my implication that magnets -can- be used as free energy, but spin it off as I'm literally saying about the vid: magnets -are being- used as free energy.
Just fucking give up. You're just failing, bro. Failing.
Myxril 2 years ago
I can tell you just changed your mind. It's obvious from your last two posts that it's just clicked :P
salamirterra 2 years ago
I haven't changed my mind. I hope you understand how delusional you're being.
But go on, continue to think that I'm claiming a man holding a set of magnets equates free energy. Continue to think that my comments somehow culminate to "I believe in perpetual motion machines".
Continue to think that you need to talk to me like an unperceptive child, telling me what's being moved, what's taking in air, what cells are doing, etc. (when all of that is already understood).
Now fuck off.
Myxril 2 years ago
Well, I gave you everything you needed to make an informed decision and you decided not to. The only thing left to do is tell you that you really are a gullible dipshit.
And a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag
salamirterra 2 years ago
You didn't give me anything that wasn't already known from watching the video.
You've only been trying to pull this stupid ad hominem bullshit this whole time, and your resorting to taking almost an hour just to basically say I'm a gullible dipshit for not bowing to your words. And I'm also a fag.
Wow. *applauds* Congrats.
I already went over your assertions and lack of reading what someone types. The only thing left to do is for you to go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself.
Get lost.
Myxril 2 years ago
You sir are an idiot
salamirterra 2 years ago
Was it that hard to say? Could you have just said that to begin with, to make your intentions clear as to you wanting to claim I'm an idiot?
Was there really any need for you to treat me like a kid, describe what I saw in the vid; as well as the energy-consuming processes involved; then claim my general comments about potential free energy were literal statements of 'this vid demonstrates working free energy'?
No. There wasn't.
You've just validated my previous comment.
I'm done with you. Bye.
Myxril 2 years ago
I actually treated you like an adult to begin with. When you refused to learn or even examine an opposing point of view despite your entire opinion being based on a fundamental misunderstanding of basic science you became a child, and I began calling you a homo.
You prancing mincing homo niggerball.
salamirterra 2 years ago
"You prancing mincing homo niggerball."
Say that to my face and I'll kill you. I don't give a fuck. :)
You're still going on about this? You still don't get that I said magnets can be used for free energy?
Of course you don't get it. Because this whole time you've been saying that I'm saying energy is taken out of a magnetic field, and that this man is creating energy in this vid. Despite the fact that I didn't say such things, nor do I believe them to be true.
Get the fuck over yourself.
Myxril 2 years ago
If I said that to your face you'd shit your pants.
Because you lick the ballsweat off donkeys.
salamirterra 2 years ago
Agreed!
connchri 2 years ago
Your a right cheeky git. I wonder if you'd be as brave to say this sort of thing to someone in person, coz I tell you what, I'd not take long cutting you down to size!
connchri 2 years ago
Magnets cannot be used for free energy. This video does not in anyway show that even as an idea. that is my point and Salamirterras point.
connchri 2 years ago
But the whole point is that in this demonstration there IS an energy source. His arm muscles.
Why don't you stick it on a frame then and prove all the peer review scientists wrong then!!?? Smart arse.
connchri 2 years ago
You continue to do the same as salamirterra. I've only stated that magnets can be used for free energy. I've seen it done in other vids on here, but apparently you're too smart to fucking find them. XD
Anyhow, that's all I was pointing out, but salamirterra had to go and say that I was saying that free energy was being made in the video.
I'd be brave enough to say this to anyone's face. Cut me down to size? Ooooo, internet bad ass.
Go play in traffic.
Myxril 2 years ago
Although the fact that a man who is clearly mystified by magnetic fields and who is claiming that magnets can generate free energy is accusing me, a physics student, of not knowing enough about physics to comprehend the awesome complexity of a man waving a magnet at a piece of copper is not lost on me ;)
salamirterra 2 years ago
I don't give a fuck what kind of student you are. You don't have to be a student to be able to learn whatever you want to learn. Narrow-minded and shallow, you are. Doesn't surprise me.
I'm done with you, now, since you're resorting to the "physics student" card to try and shoulder me out of the way.
I won't make the comment about your statement implying that every bit of material I've read or watched on the subject is now discredited, simply because I'm not a physics student.
Myxril 2 years ago
I haven't resorted to any card. In fact quite the opposite; I am trying to teach you precisely what is happening here. I haven't become insulting like you have, and I mentioned the fact I was a physics student completely outside of any actual claims I've made regarding physics.
I have not, at any point, used the fact I am studying physics as "proof" I am right. I have calmly explained to you the error in your claims and you've chosen to call me names and create straw-man arguments.
salamirterra 2 years ago
Lol, it's pretty obvious here who the more mature is. lol.
connchri 2 years ago
"I didn't say this video showed free energy being generated."
Yes you did, you implied it in your replys to my post.
Your awful good at insulting are you not? I understand it must be hard being a high school drop out. Because you sure as hell haven't got a high school understanding of whats really going on here.
connchri 2 years ago
" "I didn't say this video showed free energy being generated."
Yes you did, you implied it in your replys to my post."
No, that wasn't implied. Not once did I say this man was actually generating free energy. I said it is possible. I didn't say it was happening.
For being so smart, both you and salamirterra are pretty fucking lacking in the literature comprehension department.
I'm not even going to bother replying to all of you comments, as you tossed out like 10 of them. Heh.
Myxril 2 years ago
Then enlighting us. What is required to draw "free energy". There will not be a solution that you could think of that I could not explain. And btw, the difference is that Einstein was smart. This guy sure as hell isn't, so I still fail to see your initial point on "shooting down" my comment.
Like I said, if this was mounted onto something, it wouldn't rotate.
I'm an electrical engineer, who's worked on a lot of generators, so I'm pretty well versed in electromagnetic theory.
connchri 2 years ago 2
N4CR5, electrons don't spin in the sense you're talking about. "Spin" is a word used to explain the concepts, but there's no actual spinning going on. And there's no perpetual motion in electrons, of course.
KBendix: Sure. Free energy from outside sources (solar power, for example) is quite reasonable. But this video is claiming the energy comes from the earth's magnetic field, which is incorrect.
HarshColby 2 years ago
Science book? Science books don't explain everything. There can be some external energy source what you can't find in science books. Free energy doesn't mean creating energy... it means that you can get energy for free... ...from some external source... ... ...by using some free energy devices.
KBendix 2 years ago
Magnetism is explained very well in science books. as well as thermodynamics. and psychology books explain very well how do make the monkeys scream - by showing them a turd and telling them its a banana. he takes more time running around than actually showing his experiment, guess why.
battabaa 2 years ago
Magnetism is explained as it. That doesn't men magnetism can't be involved in free energy.
Find more about solar wind and similar energy forms, what we can't "see" that well yet. Stan Deyo talks about that in his Roswell lecture. It's not "free"... what means that you can't create energy from nothing, but you can get it for free.
Turn solar wind, heat, light or anything else that is around us in usable energy... for free.
KBendix 2 years ago
@KBendix
we can "see" solar wind. Or detect it and map it anyway.
We also know how much useful energy is in it, and trust me, it's far from as efficeient and economical as todays generating methods. Questionable even if we have the engineering ability.
connchri 2 years ago
And it's not spinning very well, at that. It would be a far more efficient use of "hand power" for him to just spin the thing like a top and do away with the smoke screen of magnets.
HarshColby 2 years ago
What perpetual motion machine makes electrons spin ;)?
N4CR5 2 years ago
No, it's not tapping into the "earth's magnetic field". The earth's magnetic field is millions of times smaller than the magnets he's moving around with his hand. If it were "tapping into" any source of power outside his hand motion, then it should spin without him holding the magnets. It's spinning because he's moving his hand, which also has far more energy than the earth's magnetic field exerts on the experiment. When he stops moving his hand, the effect stops.
HarshColby 2 years ago
Yet another guy that's never read a science book and thinks he's found a perpetual motion machine.
HarshColby 2 years ago
After my last electricity bill, I'm very interested in free and/or cheap energy.
Keruaran 2 years ago
i have a feeling that this might work :)
abhimanyu5 2 years ago
Whether this is stupid of not, it's a cool idea to think about using fluctuation in the earth's magnetic field to generate electricity.
rinpoche1 2 years ago
Bad video on the device he's got at the end. It's jumpy so you can't see the spin of the magnets slowing down, plus he doesn't leave the device run for very long. Even on the first part of the video the device is not shown running for long enough for the fields to find their balance point.
Permanent magnets will always find an equilibrium. I'm going to take the time to draw out the magnetic fields in this configuration to prove (to myself) that it won't work for long enough to be of any use.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
didnt take us long to figure free energy out.......lol was it even us? obviously not, lol
ahh goji berrries..mmmm
well done : )
joethepro3 2 years ago
Go pick some berries from a Goji berry plant
Akzimo 2 years ago
vertigo502 , it is free energy if you do not pay for the electricity that it produces. For example my energy bill (electricity bill) is $170 because my air conditioner runs all damn day long. It's 107* out side I hate heat. This Idea is a great way to get someone like me off grid and the Government cant tax the hell out what they have no control over.
sepr8te1 2 years ago
oh, i thought you were talking physics- you meant energy you don't have to pay with money.
vertigo502 2 years ago
Free energy is available today - by using solar PV panels! These should work pretty well with air conditioners. In Europe and the UK, you can sell any excess electricity you generate back to the grid for a premium price.
mandolinic 1 year ago
That is priceless energy, but not 'free' energy. Free energy is when nothing is being turned into energy. The sun is an energy source so solar energy is different
007monkeyman2 1 year ago
Hi 007monkeyman2
A couple of months ago Kbendix wrote: "Free energy doesn't mean creating energy... it means that you can get energy for free... ...from some external source.."
That sounds like solar and wind to me ;-)
I wonder why someone voted down my previous comment??
mandolinic 1 year ago
But that's not what 'free energy' is. That is energy harnessing.
007monkeyman2 1 year ago
"But that's not what 'free energy' is. That is energy harnessing."
So solar and wind technologies are simply harnessing energy and not creating it from scratch? Yes, that sounds reasonable.
mandolinic 1 year ago 2
When people talk about free energy they are talking about getting energy from nothing. I can see why people call this free energy but it's different
007monkeyman2 1 year ago
The problem with want to be scientists is that sometimey they can't see the forest for the trees. Assume for a second that this concept of magnetic power can generate electricity for 1/1000 the cost of today's electricity. These scientists would still be trying to make the point that it is not free energy therefore the science is right and the idea is defunct. Get my point here? The question is not about free energy, but is it possible to get much cheaper and greener energy?
rpaulpen 2 years ago
then we could think how we can improve it, for exmple construct a motor and make the stator magnet moving/vibrating by means of attaching it to a string or something like that,see also the respons video its better, but he must move the outer magnet so that it going to continue rotating. the other problem is how to make it rotate faster. lets try to help them first instead of criticizing maybe they are right, lets find a way how to solve the prblem, dont just follow to wat already existed rules
DECOFRANCE 2 years ago
Its not perpetual...
AngelKnight56 2 years ago 6
...but it stopped! It stopped. Why not make a frame for it to hold the pieces steady and let it spin for the duration of your explanation? It can't be THAT hard to make a little frame, right?
alphabeets 2 years ago 12
The New World Order doesn't want you to know that you can produce your own electricity perpetually through magnetism.
gloryboundkev 2 years ago
This works because it is not stable, because it is continually falling around the circle, because it is OFF BALANCE..... put this on a shaft, and it won't work.... I tried.....
fizzyelectricity 3 years ago 4
I think this thing work, I would try myself.
Kra38ken 2 years ago
to
krazeekooladam he is not using gravity haha i dont know what you were trying to say? just magnetic fields it would work in space
artilistic 3 years ago
Lots of folk working on this .. there soon must be another breakthrough '~)
netlethe 3 years ago
I can see this being applied to a motor to induce voltage. it is essentially mutual induction. Same Principal as is used in transformers. Nice place to start. Thanks for the video.
Brianawaken 3 years ago
This works because he uses 2 things. Magnetics and Gravity. Without gravity, it would not work.
krazeekooladam 3 years ago
This thing works because he's using magnets and motion. The motion of his hands, including the falling of the hub keeps the magnetic fields fluctuating. Otherwise this device would not work because the fields don't fluctuate.
How come he didn't secure the ring and put the center piece on a hub, such as using the bearing on a hard drive (with relatively low friction)? Because the device will not spin for long, that's why.
UnderManiac 2 years ago 2
precisely!!! and the reason why the 'top' stops spinning is because the motion isn't perpetual.
happyguy82 2 years ago
check out my video
this is not free energy
this is very deceiving
killaaacam 3 years ago
make me speechless by having this rotation produce more energy than the amount of energy it takes to make the magnets strong enough to do real work(produce energy).still a good way to get uneducated investors to hand over checks I guess.
Fockersnextdoor 3 years ago
The laws of Thermodynamics were written by man. Just as man once thought that we were the center of the universe, and was subsequently proven wrong, It is my thought that these laws will, eventually, be proven wrong as well.
corbangiles 3 years ago
Excellent and yet Simple Demonstration. I Like It!! Thanks For The Post!!!
Electrical007007007 3 years ago
The energy to spin the bottom rotor comes from the magnetic forces of the top ring. The energy in the top ring comes from the person's muscles. If you consider muscle power as free, then this is indeed free energy.
Mr. Nikola Tesla stated that one day man kind would connect his machinery to the driving force of the Universe. I hope that he is right.
joethewhite 3 years ago 2
Muscle power isn't free...
You use energy to move your muscles, unfortunately... And even if you didn't, those muscles would eventually die, as all organic living things do. If this was your point, I agree with you.
@ALL
However, to say that this is 'Free Energy', consider that it violates the first law of thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transferred and converted. In this case, the man's rotating the ring around the ball, using energy from his body to move the ring.
StinkyLasagna 3 years ago 4
i guess you could call this 'free energy.' It's actually already used in many motors. Take apart a an electric drill-same thing but with electromagnets, obviously so you can turn it on/off.
Unfortunately, this is video and its message are useless. In order to get anything worthwhile, one would need some huge ass magnets which are expensive as hell. sorry to burst you bubble, bro
herbleture 3 years ago
It's spinning because it's rolling. The guy's pushing/pulling it across the table with the ring magnet. Why do people fall for this?
wbrameld4 3 years ago
yes i would have to agree
datzfast 3 years ago
Put that thing on a solid surface without the hands and see if it spins
winst27 3 years ago 6
Indeed.
Fapsamup 3 years ago
as far as i know ezeik is more accurate than master.....the principle of uncertainity deals with quantum physics and not newtonian physics....all it says is that the position of a particle and its velocity cant be calculated accurately at the same time....u cud b accurate with one but the other one will be inaccurate......
someone458 3 years ago
I don't trust that table. Why not demonstrate it on a glass table?
a1mint 3 years ago
or make a large version and power an electric device?...bulb or kettle???
fusionfreq 3 years ago
IDIOTS !... If the magnet was held in place and the "toy" put underneath..it would not keep spinning. You have to move the top magnent in order for the "toy" to spin. This means that the energy is coming from your hand.
Also...even if it would spin forever...it is not doing any work. As soon as you hook up the "toy" to a device that does some kind of work, it will eventually stop working without an external force.
skid987 3 years ago 4
If this device, once initiated will "revolve perpetually", then why didn't they set it all up before the lecture? If they had, at least people could see that it had been revolving for at least several minutes on it's own without continual hand movements. As it is, it is just a toy, as he said in the video. This demo only serves to create ridicule on the whole topic of alternative energy sources and the other topics he talks about. That's more interesting imo...
OrbitalSponge 3 years ago
Pathetic quack.
Energyium is right about the hand movement (in others videos it's more easy to see that).
I'm a physics student btw.
Fausto1749 3 years ago 2
the energy comes from the movement of his hand
as he moves the magnets it repels the magnets on the spinner
causing repulsion
which then causes rotation
now
why is the spinner free on the table?
if the spinner was held in place
then the quack would not work
Energyium 3 years ago 5
true, my vid has just disproved the whole thing..
energyscience 3 years ago
Variations of frequency and medium of conduction differentiate the same energy as light, sound, heat, magnetism, color, and electricity.
Everything is driven by potential. Infinite energy... Nikola Tesla.......
eyedreamdesign 3 years ago
...following on from the previous comment. Do you think there really is only one way to move a car from A to B? Oil giants say it is only allowed to be achieved using the combustion engine, powered by their expensive profit-generating oil. Wake up folks! Movement can be harnessed using other physical laws, not just those exploited by oil bosses. Most of the negative comments, debunking inspirational videos in YouTube are likely posted by feds, paid to protect the singular way of motion. THINK!!!
jeester71 3 years ago
Like electricity and solar energy, not on unicorns or any other kind of fables.
People make this conspiracy theorys to apeal to your ignorance and make a profit out of it.
If what they say was truth, why would engineers even bother to make enignes more enficient, consuming less then half then what it was done befor? Or why does every kind of machin today consumes less then half of the energy then befor? Or why has it been so much investment in new energy research, solar, hidric, nuclear?
MasterGhostKnight 3 years ago
Let's not be too dumb here people! He's not generating free energy - nooooo. He's harnessing energy from all around us. He's using magnetic force (something naturally present in our planet) and metal shapes (also naturally present on the good mother ship we ride) together in a clever way. If you put two like-poles together, they repel. Stick wheels on and you get motion. Not creating energy, just harnessing it, right? This is exactly what the video shows. Attraction/repulsion. Natural earth!
jeester71 3 years ago 2
this is such a hoax, this guy did not demonstrate free enegry, free enegry does not exist, what he demonstarted was how a Electric Motor works, thats all a motor is, is that. we will never ever have free enegry, you can never get more enegry out of a machine then what you put in it.
travisisredneck 3 years ago
I agree, you cant have free energy!!!!! this is imposible!! this is just magnetic flux, AC motors and DC motors work this way. In fact the generators that produces the electricity you use in your house uses this magnetic theory.
edgarinv 3 years ago
How do you figure that it is not possible to use magnetic force to generate mechanical movement and electrical energy? Have you experimented yourself? If you look deep enough you will find some amazing and inspiring over unity generators which have even received media attention (whether that is good or not is a different issue..)
eyedreamdesign 3 years ago
How do you figure out?.. The answer is simple, "Education" and quite frankly you never had one on the matter to have a saying.
And yes it is an hoax, there is no such thing has machins runing indefinitively whitout imput no matter how you do it or how hard you try. AND IT CAN BE MATHEMATICALY PROVEN SO! The only way I could be wrong is if 1+1 is not 2.
MasterGhostKnight 3 years ago
Maybe the education system is designed so rigidly as to make us think in certain mechanical ways - greatly reducing the possibility of any advancements which could free us from the current energy situation. Search "double slit experiment" and you will discover that the linear, rational way of "thinking" doesn't hold up throughout our multi-dimensional universe.
eyedreamdesign 3 years ago
omg how can people think like this.... so the school says "theres no such ting as free energy, (the laws of thermodynamics) " and you say "they are wrong they say that so the oil companies can make more money" please jaj :)
edgarinv 3 years ago
I don't quite know about science, but I think, and correct me if i'm wrong, that what he is saying is that it is free in terms of monetary value. Of course excluding the ones that are use for purchasing the necessary materials.
angud2000 3 years ago
mm not quite like that, the term means that the amount of work produced by a machine is more than the work that you use to make it work, wich is IMPOSIBLE just for the simple fact that physic laws exist. The term its not well used here, free energy does not exist, the cool thing about his experiment is that you dont need electricity to make it spin, but it doesnt mean that theres not work involved.
edgarinv 3 years ago
@MasterGhostKnight: There are another ways in which you can be wrong. Most importantly, it's not mathematically proven but it has been shown/demonstrated. Our "laws of physics" have changed through time. We try to use the best knowledge available, but we still learn more every day.
Norbert2 3 years ago
You see that is where you go wrong. because you don't have an education you don't know what are you talking about.
1. The double slit experiment was first described in theory and only afterwards observed.
2. What you didn't knew was that energy comes from a mathematical concept. So when it comes down to energy it is not a case of possibility or an alternative way, it just is because mathematics is absolut!
MasterGhostKnight 3 years ago
We are limited by our beliefs. Consciousness creates the reality we experience. You will not see it, until you believe it. If you stand resolute with the restrictions you have been taught, you will not discover anything new. Think outside the box, the universe is magic.
eyedreamdesign 3 years ago
That is absolutly incorrect. What things are doesn't depend of what you think of it, they just are. You can argue whit math a say that 1+1 is not 2, but no matter how much you argue 1+1 will allways be 2. It is not about belif, math doesn't depend of anything in the real world, however if you find something in the real world that can be expressed mathematicaly it will invariably act acording to it. If you have 1 sheep in one place and 1 somewhere else the total of sheep will allways be 2.
MasterGhostKnight 3 years ago
so u think this is bullcrap or not??
p.s. dont start crapping on about "why would engineers do this and why wouldnt they do that if so and so..." U dont know what engineers HAVE and HAVNT done! All u know is what they show u...........what is out on the market! Who are companies ultimately controled by??.........THE GOVERNMENT (corruption and evilness). Man i dont know what to believe anymore, help a brother out o_O
marek0086 3 years ago