So if I am hearing you correctly, all energy is light/photons and the old equation E=MC2 is probably more accurately expressed as E=pC∞ ; is that what you mean?
Yes, I agree. The latter is not an equation. Never has been. That's why there is symbol < used. You see, the problem is that scientists/theorists look at the big bang from the earthly condition point of view, any other condition can be only presumed. Nobody knows for certain what kind of conditions were there during at the moment of the beginning. Beginning of what? It was not beginning. It was another transformation in the chain of transformations. As said: For some time the world of science
is discovering what metaphysical and spiritual teachers have known for centuries. The physical world is not really composed of any matter at all; the basic component of it is a force or essence, which is called energy.Things appear to be solid and separate from each other where our physical senses normally perceive them. While on the atomic and subatomic level, a solid matter is a cluster of small particles.Particles within particle called sub-particles. Bosons, which are assumed to be massless.
They were detected by high-energy experiments at the CERN laboratories in 1983. Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow shared the 1979 Nobel Prize for physics for their model, protons, and eventually photons which turn out to be just pure energy, they said. The Law of Conservation of Energy states exactly the same that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can change its form, transform. Therefore as my father said: Uncle Al made a slight mistake. He invented an equation concerning energy E=
... limiting its potential to earthly conditions. Once again what the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, imagine. Imagine, "Imagination is more important than knowledge" that's one of Uncle Al's quotes, another: "Mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind", what amount of potential initial energy was preserved possessed while released at the moment of the big bang?
The Conservation of energy law has been already discussed. It is abolished.
Yes Integr8. The new proposal of e<mc∞ explains it to the subatomic particle. Never ending half! Please check my website, Sequel Box, Sequel 1 on
ww.peace365.org
marekmzielinski 10 months ago
The Conservation of energy law has been already discussed. It is abolished.
Yes Integr8. The new proposal of e<mc∞ explains it to the subatomic particle. Never ending half! Please check my website, Sequel Box, Sequel 1 on
ww.peace365
marekmzielinski 10 months ago
So if I am hearing you correctly, all energy is light/photons and the old equation E=MC2 is probably more accurately expressed as E=pC∞ ; is that what you mean?
Integr8 10 months ago
I must disagree.The Latter is not a equation at all but a statement which is untrue under the Conservation of energy law.
MaliceSM 2 years ago
Yes, I agree. The latter is not an equation. Never has been. That's why there is symbol < used. You see, the problem is that scientists/theorists look at the big bang from the earthly condition point of view, any other condition can be only presumed. Nobody knows for certain what kind of conditions were there during at the moment of the beginning. Beginning of what? It was not beginning. It was another transformation in the chain of transformations. As said: For some time the world of science
marekmzielinski 2 years ago
is discovering what metaphysical and spiritual teachers have known for centuries. The physical world is not really composed of any matter at all; the basic component of it is a force or essence, which is called energy.Things appear to be solid and separate from each other where our physical senses normally perceive them. While on the atomic and subatomic level, a solid matter is a cluster of small particles.Particles within particle called sub-particles. Bosons, which are assumed to be massless.
marekmzielinski 2 years ago
They were detected by high-energy experiments at the CERN laboratories in 1983. Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow shared the 1979 Nobel Prize for physics for their model, protons, and eventually photons which turn out to be just pure energy, they said. The Law of Conservation of Energy states exactly the same that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can change its form, transform. Therefore as my father said: Uncle Al made a slight mistake. He invented an equation concerning energy E=
marekmzielinski 2 years ago
... limiting its potential to earthly conditions. Once again what the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, imagine. Imagine, "Imagination is more important than knowledge" that's one of Uncle Al's quotes, another: "Mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind", what amount of potential initial energy was preserved possessed while released at the moment of the big bang?
marekmzielinski 2 years ago
Imagine, imagine? what is beyond < ...
marekmzielinski 2 years ago