Ahhhh cry me a river. Also take your sob story ad's all over youtube and shove it. Boeing knows very little about the actual providing of a working weapons system but how to bilk the system of all it can squeeze.
Ah, ah Boeing has less than 50% chance in the protest, ah, ah. Again analysts are wrong. First they said Boeing will win the contract. They were surprised when the air force gave the contract to NG/EADS. Then they said NG/EADS won in 4 out of 5 criteria and beated Boeing hands down so winning the protest is a very slim chance. The GAO proved them wrong by saying the competition is very close. Don't believe the analysts anymore. They are overpaid, overrated pretend to know their sh** dumb asses.
Those analysts have 20+ years engineering experience. More than you or me :) Actually, when I read the GAO, it doesn't say very close. Plus Boeing won the protest so now they are talking rebid. I dont know who will win in the end though.
The analysts were stunned because the USAF are making decisions beyond common sense and technical sense (based from the RFP they put in the table). Second, they concluded that the protest will not going to be upheld based from historical data. Based from percentage of protests dismissed by GAO instead of analyzing the merit of the protest. That's why I don't believe on what analysts are saying anymore. This contest is for who ever will not get caught cheating will win. Sucks for us tax payers.
I don't really think its cheating on THAT level. I mean, Boeing had 2 CEO's go to prison. But that doesn't mean EVERY single Boeing employee is crooked. The workers at airbus and boeing are extremely proud of the work they do. I do find it wrong that the USAF changed the requirements on Boeing (we know this happened) At least this way, whoever gets the contract wins it fair and the other side can't argue.
Well......apparently that less than 50% chance came true because the current administration has stopped the contract bid and decided that Boeing will retain the contract until next year.
We are surprised that even though it seemed like we were going to win since we are a U.S company, and that this selection process was supposed to be fair(ha ha), how dare does the Air Force actually run a fair decision making process
Boeing is a garbage company that got caught with its c*** in the wide open in 2002, now they get what they deserve. BTW Boeing, whens that "nightmareliner" gonna roll out? 2012? LOL! GO ALABAMA and MOBILE!
I guess the garbage company you are talking about exists for more than 90 years. Built the airplanes that contributed to winning WWII. Built the airplanes that changed commercial aviation. When was Alabama built an airplane? All new airplane designs encounter problems, and these kind of machines are not easily designed and built. Ask about Airbus's A380. Oh by the way the A330's first flight test ended up in a tragedy. So go ahead and LOL! More like GO EUROPE! and go alabama and mobile!
Didn't the Air Force choose the 767-400 as the platform for the E-10A? Why would they select two different platforms when the Air Force could have used a common airframe?
I think this will depend on how the GAO interprets the Air Force RFP. Boeing may have a legitimate gripe on their hands.
Also, how are we to assume that there were not questionable decisions made in this case as there when this contract was originally awarded to Boeing several years ago.
My personal opinion is that the US gov is just trying to appease the French to get them back on our good graces.
Could it be that this is actually a poisened gift to airbus. If the american government anticipates that the dollar will go far down it could mean that airbus will get way to little money for this huge order.
Ahhhh cry me a river. Also take your sob story ad's all over youtube and shove it. Boeing knows very little about the actual providing of a working weapons system but how to bilk the system of all it can squeeze.
1126thmp 1 year ago
Ah, ah Boeing has less than 50% chance in the protest, ah, ah. Again analysts are wrong. First they said Boeing will win the contract. They were surprised when the air force gave the contract to NG/EADS. Then they said NG/EADS won in 4 out of 5 criteria and beated Boeing hands down so winning the protest is a very slim chance. The GAO proved them wrong by saying the competition is very close. Don't believe the analysts anymore. They are overpaid, overrated pretend to know their sh** dumb asses.
pinoyaggie 3 years ago
Those analysts have 20+ years engineering experience. More than you or me :) Actually, when I read the GAO, it doesn't say very close. Plus Boeing won the protest so now they are talking rebid. I dont know who will win in the end though.
Comiccon32 3 years ago
The analysts were stunned because the USAF are making decisions beyond common sense and technical sense (based from the RFP they put in the table). Second, they concluded that the protest will not going to be upheld based from historical data. Based from percentage of protests dismissed by GAO instead of analyzing the merit of the protest. That's why I don't believe on what analysts are saying anymore. This contest is for who ever will not get caught cheating will win. Sucks for us tax payers.
pinoyaggie 3 years ago
I don't really think its cheating on THAT level. I mean, Boeing had 2 CEO's go to prison. But that doesn't mean EVERY single Boeing employee is crooked. The workers at airbus and boeing are extremely proud of the work they do. I do find it wrong that the USAF changed the requirements on Boeing (we know this happened) At least this way, whoever gets the contract wins it fair and the other side can't argue.
Comiccon32 3 years ago 2
Well......apparently that less than 50% chance came true because the current administration has stopped the contract bid and decided that Boeing will retain the contract until next year.
cmatos2007 3 years ago
Before or after you and your executive cronie at Boeing got caught bribing the USAF!
maxvalley 3 years ago
We are surprised that even though it seemed like we were going to win since we are a U.S company, and that this selection process was supposed to be fair(ha ha), how dare does the Air Force actually run a fair decision making process
mm89f 3 years ago
Boeing is a garbage company that got caught with its c*** in the wide open in 2002, now they get what they deserve. BTW Boeing, whens that "nightmareliner" gonna roll out? 2012? LOL! GO ALABAMA and MOBILE!
rolltidemobile 3 years ago
Well don't forget Boeing has like 6 locations in Alabama (Huntsville and Decatur)
cmatos2007 3 years ago
I guess the garbage company you are talking about exists for more than 90 years. Built the airplanes that contributed to winning WWII. Built the airplanes that changed commercial aviation. When was Alabama built an airplane? All new airplane designs encounter problems, and these kind of machines are not easily designed and built. Ask about Airbus's A380. Oh by the way the A330's first flight test ended up in a tragedy. So go ahead and LOL! More like GO EUROPE! and go alabama and mobile!
pinoyaggie 3 years ago
Didn't the Air Force choose the 767-400 as the platform for the E-10A? Why would they select two different platforms when the Air Force could have used a common airframe?
mrblujet 4 years ago
I think this will depend on how the GAO interprets the Air Force RFP. Boeing may have a legitimate gripe on their hands.
Also, how are we to assume that there were not questionable decisions made in this case as there when this contract was originally awarded to Boeing several years ago.
My personal opinion is that the US gov is just trying to appease the French to get them back on our good graces.
mrblujet 4 years ago
Could it be that this is actually a poisened gift to airbus. If the american government anticipates that the dollar will go far down it could mean that airbus will get way to little money for this huge order.
fatjohn1408 4 years ago
Boeing needs another government handout. Can anyone answer what's the difference between welfare, corporate handout or subsidy?
thereallurker 4 years ago