i dont want evolution taught in school because the logical faculties of reason do not support it. Why would I spend my times learning about a false reality. Scientists should spend their time trying to improve humanity, and stop trying to prove evolution using complicated scientific jargon to sound superior.
@TheRollerdisco Scientists are not trying to prove evolution. It is already proven. Now they need to know how and why certain things adapted so they can better understand to effect things. Much like a doctor needing to understand the cause of the disease before they can give a cure. Evolution is descriptive not prescriptive. I don't understand what flawed arguments you are talking about in evolution and without evolution NOTHING about biology and variety in species would make any sense.
@anubis2814 Evolution is a Hypothesis of How Life came to Be. According to logic and scientific laws such as law of Biogenesis Louis Pasteur a great scientist deserves credit for that one. Fossil Record proves evolution is wrong. Evolution hypothesis breaks down real quick. A logical mind would then think since spontaneous life is not scientifically possible, there must be another explanation. I'm not talking about the Bible, only rational deductions.
@TheRollerdisco Evolution is a theory not a hypothesis. Evoution is not abiogenesis. The fossil record and DNA prove evolution in that there are tons and tons of diversity that could not live on a planet in the same food chain for just 6000 years. Spontaneous life is not possible. You are extremely confused as to what the theory of evolution by natural selection actually says. If it said what you are saying then yes evolution would be stupid. Please research I can recommend vids if you like
as for #3, the last part of ID people is true. but just because someone is stupid or deluded doesn't mean they should be treated like crap. So to stop thinking of them as idiots, imo is wrong, but I agree that treating them like lesser people is ineffective for teaching. Basically arrogance + ignorance = more ignorance. I wish we had more educators like Carl Sagan, who actually had the ability to inspire and calmly explain science and more importantly the scientific method.
"Its seems people only have watched the first or the last vids,"
That is probably because this intro doesn't make it clear where you're coming from. I came here from "Lazy self-plug video" where it explains that this was made in response to a TV show. But to watch the video and have you suddenly talking about chaos or whatever, left me wondering -- and wondering if some of your assertions shouldn't be qualified. On to part 2.
@Blackmark52 You've probably got a good point. I've considered doing a remake of these vids at some point since they were my first ones and the quality sucked. Haven't had the time or the drive though.
@anubis2814 You are correct in that the quality of this video is not great, but the subject is very interesting. If you ever redo it , you could incorporate some better images too.
The problem with ID is that it does not see that evolution already supports purpose.
dfpolis 10 months ago
i dont want evolution taught in school because the logical faculties of reason do not support it. Why would I spend my times learning about a false reality. Scientists should spend their time trying to improve humanity, and stop trying to prove evolution using complicated scientific jargon to sound superior.
TheRollerdisco 1 year ago
@TheRollerdisco Scientists are not trying to prove evolution. It is already proven. Now they need to know how and why certain things adapted so they can better understand to effect things. Much like a doctor needing to understand the cause of the disease before they can give a cure. Evolution is descriptive not prescriptive. I don't understand what flawed arguments you are talking about in evolution and without evolution NOTHING about biology and variety in species would make any sense.
anubis2814 1 year ago
@anubis2814 Evolution is a Hypothesis of How Life came to Be. According to logic and scientific laws such as law of Biogenesis Louis Pasteur a great scientist deserves credit for that one. Fossil Record proves evolution is wrong. Evolution hypothesis breaks down real quick. A logical mind would then think since spontaneous life is not scientifically possible, there must be another explanation. I'm not talking about the Bible, only rational deductions.
TheRollerdisco 10 months ago
@TheRollerdisco Evolution is a theory not a hypothesis. Evoution is not abiogenesis. The fossil record and DNA prove evolution in that there are tons and tons of diversity that could not live on a planet in the same food chain for just 6000 years. Spontaneous life is not possible. You are extremely confused as to what the theory of evolution by natural selection actually says. If it said what you are saying then yes evolution would be stupid. Please research I can recommend vids if you like
anubis2814 10 months ago
You present a powerful case against intelligent design. I'm not sure that is something to be proud of.
MorganMarvinson 1 year ago
as for #3, the last part of ID people is true. but just because someone is stupid or deluded doesn't mean they should be treated like crap. So to stop thinking of them as idiots, imo is wrong, but I agree that treating them like lesser people is ineffective for teaching. Basically arrogance + ignorance = more ignorance. I wish we had more educators like Carl Sagan, who actually had the ability to inspire and calmly explain science and more importantly the scientific method.
mistereveready 1 year ago
"Its seems people only have watched the first or the last vids,"
That is probably because this intro doesn't make it clear where you're coming from. I came here from "Lazy self-plug video" where it explains that this was made in response to a TV show. But to watch the video and have you suddenly talking about chaos or whatever, left me wondering -- and wondering if some of your assertions shouldn't be qualified. On to part 2.
Blackmark52 1 year ago
@Blackmark52 You've probably got a good point. I've considered doing a remake of these vids at some point since they were my first ones and the quality sucked. Haven't had the time or the drive though.
anubis2814 1 year ago
@anubis2814 You are correct in that the quality of this video is not great, but the subject is very interesting. If you ever redo it , you could incorporate some better images too.
Campineiroamericano 1 year ago
You are so true!
Trunkskoi 2 years ago