Added: 3 years ago
From: xoxduffyxox
Views: 87,422
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,844)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If circumcision (male or female) is not sexual asault, I don't know what is. The doctors shouldn't be doing it regardless. If they have to do it for medical reasons instead of aesthetic ones, why in the hell do they have to cut so much of it off? I am not advocating circumcision, but whoever did mine took way to much off. If it were up to me, I would find that idiot, tell him to bite the curb and drop kick him back into the stone age where him and his dumbass Torah belongs!

  • @Nifrayu That is not a valid example because removing fingernails would present other risks in itself whereas circumcision has no risk and is quite beneficial As I said parents actually do have the right to decide what's best in my opinion eithe way is fine but I don't believe you should criticise parents for circumcising their children.

  • @Alizindahouse "circumcision has no risk" Are you even aware of what you just said? Of course there are risks. That's besides the point. The point is that it is a Human Rights Violation.

    "I don't believe you should criticise parents for circumcising their children." Why not exactly? Elaborate.

  • Comment removed

  • @Nifrayu Well it might protect the glans but circumcision protects u from countless penile diseases. Smegma won't build up and it women generally like the look of a circumcised penis better ok. I'm not gonna argue with you. I dont mind if u are circumcised or not but I am just agiainst this video saying that u shouldn't curcumcised ur children because it is wrong. It is up to the parents

  • @Alizindahouse Prevention is not a valid reason to remove healthy body parts from infants.

    Would you say it is up to the parents to have their children fingernails permanently removed to prevent nail infection and ingrown finger nails? It would also save them all that time from having to clip them.

    This is a human rights violation. It is also child abuse. Parents don't have the right to decide what body parts their children do and don't get to keep.

  • @yanksgohome Umm actually it does prevent countless diseases... 80 percent of women claim that curcumcised penises look better , it prevents the build up of smegma and because it has less fine touch nerve receptors allows u to last longer in sex do some research mate

  • Look i was circumcised as a kid and although i didn't have a choice I am very glad my parents circumcised me because a circumcised penis looks better, allows you to last longer in sex and prevents countless diseases not to mention that your dick won't smell bad. Dont tell people not to circumcise their children because the foreskin serves no purpose

  • @Alizindahouse, circumcision provides none of the benefits you claim. The foreskin has an important sexual function. It is richly innervated (far better endowed with fine-touch nerve receptors than the head of the penis is). Its removal alters the dynamics of penile function. It is great that most Australian boys are now left intact, although their fathers often have the mutilated penis.

  • @Alizindahouse Of course it has a purpose don't be absurd. It serves multiple purposes. IT keeps the glans moist and sensitive. It protects the glans in more ways than one. It contains the most sensitive part of the penis. It has a gliding function to help prevent painful intercourse.

    Parents have no right to remove perfectly healthy body parts from their children.

  • Im cut and pretty happy with what I have. If you're relying on foreskin to make you bigger then your clutching at straws really.

  • Comment removed

  • @dafty97 You must be mutilated and ashamed so

  • Comment removed

  • @dafty97 Yep you cut and also why would a Mother think her son's penis is her business to slice up!

  • im uncut

  • @TheAuzzyboy Yummy!

  • its not mutilation you dummy. Its based on a covenant between god and man kind. Its in the bible. You are a fucking moron.

    Its not wrong, sick, disgusting, or for doctors. It was based on a covenant between god and mankind. you're such an ignorant cunt.

  • @jasonyoungisnumber "its not mutilation"

    Now who is the stupid one? Of course it is mutilation. You can't argue with the dictionary.

  • @jasonyoungisnumber1 Oh... yeah, I can't argue against religion, forgot... [you should probably read the dictionary for a change]

  • what are you so concerned about cocks for? You're like 17 years old. are you a huge slut? Stop worrying about guys dicks. You don't even have a dick.

    You really are the stupidest person on all of you tube. How could you know what is best for a man when you aren't a man yourself?

    Please don't circumsize your kid? you are a fucking moron.

  • Hi May I ask you a question?

  • I am so freking glad a im uncircumcision it soo easy to masturbate no lubricant needed :D

  • Kind of funny that airhead Jenny McCarthy was so petty, small minded she would say that. To me a circumcised penis is ugly. A cut penis is like a face with its lips torn off.

  • @Woblesavvy Here here well said

  • Doctors & nurses say that an uncircumcised penis is difficult to clean. Well, I'm a father of a girl and a boy and I can tell you that my daughters vagina would get full of shit every time she pooped in her diaper. The male penis is MUCH easier to clean! So are we supposed to cut out every girl's vagina so that she won't get an infection? Face it, it's just a scam to get money and women are just evil towards males cause they always attack males in their genitals. Jealous penis envy bitches!

  • jack ripper hates juws and mutalation fucku all im jack ripper oim take its name

  • I'm glad I was not circumcised as a kid. And secondly, i agree. Why fix something that's not broken? Actually the foreskin is supposed to be tight on infants, kids are usually not able to retract it before later stages of childhood/beginning of teenage years. The kid is supposed to do it by itself.

    its like saying "omg. I could get a gangrene in my finger. lets amputate before it gets that far" which it in 99.9% of the cases won't:P

  • dont worry u can play with my forskin

  • This video is most popular with:

    Gender Age

    Male 45-54

    Male 35-44

    Male 55-64

  • Circumcision is genital mutilation which is a sex crime! Intact men are bigger, better and way sexier because they are happy and not weird and fucked up because Mommy hacked off the best part of their penis. And seeing cut men attempt masturbation is HILARIOUS!

  • @CutDicksRSmallNUgly You realise its not their fault that alot of men are circumcised. Most of them dont want to be circumcised and yet you ridicule them like that. Its not right

  • Can you come over and circumcise me?

  • @419scammerguy You can't pleasure her without a foreskin

  • My foreskin won't pull back...

  • if she'd make any sence at all, it would be ok. I doubt anyone that has been will bitch about it, and those unfortunate not to have been, were wishing they were when they were babies, after it tears, bleeds, and hurts. sorry folks, but you are beating a dead horse here. if you havent a dick, or there problems, yeah, shut the hell up! EASY!

  • @babeshedake Every body has the right to talk about human right violations weather they went through it or not. Your the one who isn't making any sense. There is not one shred of logic in your intire comment.

  • Look all the circumcised guys telling the girl to shut up. Feeling defensive, dudes?

  • what the fuck is with all these girls talking about this shit? I can see if its their kids and all, but wtf?

  • @sdave616 Uh, maybe because women are on the receiving end of bad sex from cut men? She has every right to talk about things that are wrong and should be against the law.

  • now we should be coming across some 12 year old boy preaching about brest augmentation... shut up, chick... when you have no friggin clue what you are talking about.

  • @babeshedake The Penis - Sex Education 101 youtube . com/watch?v=BgoTRMKrJo4

  • Oh good...a video by an idiot.

  • In infants, you don't pull back the foreskin to clean under it...you just wipe what you see. The foreskin is fused to the glans to protect it until adolesence, when the boys separate it themselves. If you pull back the skin during infancy or toddlerhood, it can cause bacteria to be trapped under the skin, causing infection. That's the BIGGEST MYTH about intact boys - you DON'T PULL BACK THE SKIN!

  • thanks for your vid. you are right in every respect: infant circumcision without medical reason is nothing but a mutilation - no doubt about that.

  • Nobody pay attention to the former mentioned responses. One day you'll all get what you want. When they outlaw infant circumcision you'll find something else to bitch about.

  • To the girl posting this VLOG. You seem SWEET, young, and pretty. But I'm not going to say anything more to you than, "For someone who OBVIOUSLY endured life up until now, how much PAIN do you remember from your New Born infancy? None. Because you could't descern pain that early, crying was your bodies way of communicating. They don't know what's going on, everything is a reaction up until they're older."

  • And the other procedures I mentioned are not because they're done on infants, ie. breast augment-breast reduction-frenulum correction-I brought those to the fore-front because those NECESSARY corrective surgeries you deem Butchery or Mutilation would by "Strict Definition" be malpractice rendering a lot of people helpless with complication. This is for everyone. Use YOUR head not anyone elses.

  • @Bleeepism "I brought those to the fore-front because those NECESSARY corrective surgeries you deem Butchery or Mutilation would by "Strict Definition" be malpractice" No it's not. This are done with the (adult) patients informed concent. There is no malpractice in that.

  • Based on the lack of structure or merit to any of your biased view points I'm willing to bet my Imaginary inheritance that your biased lies in some relationship you have with the poster of this vlog, I bet you're either sweet on her or buddies with her. I speak with no cloudy judgment. Balanced.

  • I'm done talking about it man. It's MOOT. MOOT! You understand? What will you make me see that I don't already? I was abused growing up. CIRCUMCISION was NEVER on my mind. You just make showy expressions of mock concern and sympathy. But it's of no USE but to subdue those who have reasons or concerns leading them to look out for the better interests of their son that YOU MAY NOT EVEN KNOW! Let it die with dignity. You can't force me to believe a lie, born in the womb of society.

  • It's BIASED LIBERAL PROPAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANDAAAAAA­AAAAA. I'm against child abuse, but that is not child abuse. It's a simple slit and application of a plastibell. For: Health issues, social issues, family issues? WHO KNOWS. Maybe the father said my son will not inheret my million dollar heritage unless he's CIRCUMCISED. What would you do? Deny him SKIN or BIRTHRIGHT? Leave it to the PAAAAARENTS! It is a choice for parents.

  • @Bleeepism "LIBERAL" Where do you get this liberal nonesence? Your the liberal here. Forcing your own child's body to look a certain way because of YOUR personal preference NOT his. Expecting your son to adopt the exact same personal view as you. That is liberal my freind. You are decieving your self.

    "What would you do? Deny him SKIN or BIRTHRIGHT?" That is up to him. Duh! I am not denying him anything. It is his decicion to make. Living in his natural human body is his birthright.

  • @Nifrayu You don't know the scenario is the point. If the one giving the inheritance wanted proof before he died and maybe was on his death bed. You can go ALL day with endless scenarios you can't anticipate. I don't circumcise the kid, the giver dies now the kid grows up and asks me about it, "Oh I wanted to know if YOU'D want the foreskin or your father's inheritance but he died before you were old enough." I'm not forcing anyone, I'm not forcing MY views, I'm speaking of balance.

  • @Bleeepism "You can go ALL day with endless scenarios you can't anticipate."

    The only senarios in which there is a valid reason to opperate on a child is to treat a medical problem. If you disagree explain why.

  • It's all about not butting into affairs of people. It's a debate. If I want to circumcise my son or not is MY choice, I'm not saying I will or won't. If I see some penoscrotal webbing or issues that might evolve over the years I may feel it's in HIS best interest to circumcise him. I'm going to turn away from his well being based on the OPINIONS of societie's view on the norm? You're a FOLLOWER and they call people who get Circumcised conformists? Conformists to what? Idiots.

  • @Bleeepism "You'er a FOLLOWER"

    Who are you talking to? ME?

    How am I a follower?

    Who am I following? You're not making any sense.

  • @Bleeepism "The point is not beauty but taking action on possible problems" Is it really? Because you could have easily made that a lot more clear from the beginning. Opperating on a child with a medical problem that is threatening the well being of the child is different than removing what will be about 15 square inches of healthy skin tissue when there is no problem to speak of. So what exactly is your stance on this? Explain it to me clearly.

  • @Nifrayu It doesn't matter. I'm not going to EVER agree. I'm done. EVEN with health issues people will protest because that's all they want to do, they want to take a gaurdian's rights away concerning this issue. Bottom line. I'm done man. Believe what you want.

  • @Bleeepism "EVEN with health issues people will protest because that's all they want to do"

    What!? I don't believe that. Your going to have to give me an example. I can't imagine someone protesting against a parent having a medically necessary operation done on a child. You're being ridicules.

  • Don't pester me, Hippocratic oath from "Hippocrates" ethical practice. Beauty eye of beholder. Who's the beholder? Beauty what? You speaking about an extremity or foreskin? The point is not beauty but taking action on possible problems, Don't argue with me man. If my cars doing something on the road that's strange, I'm going to address the issue before it gets worse. If I see something wrong that can be corrected with my child I'll address it if not I won't. But I won't OVER GENERALIZE

  • Based on my own view of how society should be. That's what people do say INFANT CIRCUMCISION they're taking this and that away, but you NEVER KNOW WHAT THEY'RE PRESERVING! That's Over Generalizing. Giving rights to NON-DISCERNING individuals in lieu of the GAURDIANS and DOCTOR'S concern for future well being. You CANT FORCE ME TO BELIEVE A LIE x 1,000,000.

  • @Bleeepism I support you, it's the parents choice. However, I still disagree with the practice. I just hope your kid does not ever find out about what was denied to him without consent. If he does, then he'll likely resent you for the rest of his life

  • Love that comment about the "one motion" that men do thousands of times. So true! Doing that another one time a day is really not that difficult (notice how I avoid the word "hard"). In fact... um, yeah... it's kinda fun =^_^=

  • Now remember that all that could've been prevented with the removal of the arm at YOUR behest YEARS before. (For you people with no foundation) (and "Let ME try to reason with you Logically" for smart mouthed stupid brained people.) It's what? A matter for what? You can say it. A matter for p-a-r-e....you get it. I hope.

  • @Bleeepism I wouldn't remove it unless it becomes a problem which it likely will. If it was not necessary however I would leave that up to the child. When my child became old enough to understand the issue and if my child expressed that he/she want's it removed I would honer that wish.

  • @Nifrayu Now. Imperfection. Abnormality. Birth Defect, those are definitions, but does that make him more or less of a human? Where are his rights? Also TONGUE FRENULUM removals ARE an issue with infants. Also NOBODY forces a child to get circumcision since the child does not oppose nor do they force Tongue Frenulum removal because the infant does not oppose. Also to get the arm removed when all the tissue increase and blood flow increase is a greater risk for child when older.

  • @Nifrayu It's not a bad analogy, that's why I put that little part that says "Just a Scenario". The point you OBVIOUSLY missed was.....*Drum Roll*...The removal of the arm later would subject him to pain in recovery, be more of a risk from growth of tissue and increase in blood flow when he's older and be more expensive. But to protect him from those potential risks and do it when he's an infant would be in your words "Denying him his human rights." Based on YOU and Societies standard of norm

  • @Nifrayu Because it's "A birth defect". RIGHT there you label him and say "Oh in THAT case chop his arm off." Jenny McCarthy said to make her "Son's Penis Normal" she was going to circumcise him....difference? There is none, it lies in the decision maker's hand, the parent. And to NOT chop it off would subject him to "being abnormal, possible health issues, etc." Do you know? No but what would you do? You don't know. Don't tell ME to get Educated. It's all liberal propaganda.

  • @Bleeepism "does that make him more or less of a human?" Neither. Do you really think that way? That it makes some one more or less human?

    "Where are his rights?" How about basic "human" rights! Duh! I mentioned that earlier. He is a "human" weather you admit it or not. Therefore he is entitled to his basic "human" rights.

  • @Bleeepism "The point you OBVIOUSLY missed was.....*Drum Roll*...The removal of the arm later would subject him to pain in recovery, be more of a risk from growth of tissue and increase in blood flow when he's older and be more expensive." Huh!? What makes you think I missed that? I assure you I did not. None of that is a valid reason to deny him his right to live in his natural human body.

    "and be more expensive." So what? You put more value in money than your childrens rights? That's sick.

  • @Bleeepism " Because it's "A birth defect". RIGHT there you label him and say "Oh in THAT case chop his arm off."

    No!? Where did I say that!?

    Your just putting words in my mouth as opposed to responding to what I actually said.

  • @Nifrayu It's called paraphrasing, you went on a rant talking about "Worthless Extra Tissue" because it's a BIRTH DEFECT. A "BIRTH DEFECT" by SOCIETIES standard. It's healthyexcess healthy TISSUE AND BONE AND BLOOD, but they have two already so the extra one is a BIRTH DEFECT, so who cares right? Because it's a "Birth Defect" that is an "Imperfection"? THOSE WORDS came out of your mouth. We're talking about a tiny flap of skin in comparison to an EXTREMITY!

  • @Bleeepism "so who cares right?" I think the person whos body is in question would care. That is my whole point. That is it not my call because it is not my body that is being permanantly altered. I thought I made that perfectly clear.

  • @Nifrayu You can't admit that it's a double standard, you're trying to fight for a cause for YOUR own narrow-minded belief. When infact I know hundreds of guys who are circumcised from birth with NO problems and men getting circumcised when older due to issues, who infact, FEEL ALL THE PAIN, have trouble healing, and so forth, due to difficulty that comes with age. I actually got circumcised when OLDER and can say, the differnce doesn't bother me, I wish I'd got it done younger cause of pain.

  • @Nifrayu And a GOOD DOCTOR would say that since it's smaller, less blood flow, less growth of tissue so it can prevent future horrible scarring (Still scar but not as bad). It would be safer to do it when it is an infant, also, Waiting until he's old enough to feel the pain, recover with difficulty do to the diminishing of elasticity of the skin over the years, possible hemorraging....years of feeling different, self-esteem issues. Come on really? Define Child abuse again please?

  • @Bleeepism A good doctor would respect the patients right to bodily integrity. Have you not heard of the hippocratic oath?

    "Define Child abuse again please?" Causing a child needless pain and suffering. "self-esteem issues." Exactly. Removing a part of someones body whith out that persons consent can cause them years of self esteem issues. That is why you let them decide what cosmetic surgeries they will have done to there own bodies. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" Heard of it?

  • *That's JUST a scenario for Surgical removal of "Healthy" tissue (aka Mutilation by liberal terms). Think logically, actually think, none of this "I'd teach him to play the piano crap". Let's say he LEARNS the piano and hates having an extra arm, saying, I want to play GOOD because I'm good, not because I have an extra arm, I want people to come to HEAR me not stare at me, REEEEALLY Think like a parent. Who's to tell you what you or him decide when you CAN is wrong?

  • @Bleeepism Let me start by answering this question. "Who's to tell you what you or him decide when you CAN is wrong?" When you are doing something that infringes on the basic human rights of someone I.E. an infant. I think anyone has the right to call you out on that.

  • @Bleeepism Now this extra arm example you're using is a bad analogy. It's a birth defect. A arm that probably has no function or inherent purpose. In the strictest sense it is not a healthy body part.

  • @Bleeepism A birth defect is usually nothing more than an imperfection. Removing an imperfection is not mutilation. Mutilation is to make imperfect by altering parts. Health and functional foreskin is not an imperfection. To remove something that is healthy and functional from your body is by definition mutilation.

  • @Nifrayu The foreskin has no function. except to make a fireman hat look like a rocket

  • Listen I apologize for my TONE. Let my TRY to reason with you LOGICALLY. You have a kid. He's born with THREE arms. Doctor says you have a HEALTHY baby but the arm could be an issue, or a blessing. You ask his opinion and he says; "I would remove it just incase." Answering TRUTHFULLY....that's the trick answer TRUTHFULLY and under the pretenses that you're a good parent. What would you do? Now what if someone was saying DON'T DO IT IT'S MUTILATION. Think about the teasing, clothing, etc

  • People keep saying "Ripping, Mutilating, Tearing, Deforming". I will agree with you. "Sending your baby to the Hewitt residence in Texas IS abuse. You should go to a doctor, preferably a jewish doctor."

  • It's child abuse to leave a child in a dumpster and not take care of it, but as long as a parent takes care of their baby ie: feeds, clothes, bathes, it etc. It's up to that parent. You want to adopt their kid and do a better job raising it ask them, you want to have a kid to NOT circumcise it and make a statement, GO ahead. But the world has no more right to tell YOU to CIRCUMCISE your child, then you have about their kids. Surgery is NOT mutilation, risks come with and without surgery.

  • @Bleeepism "It's child abuse to leave a child in a dumpster and not take care of it, but as long as a parent takes care of their baby ie: feeds, clothes, bathes, it etc. It's up to that parent."

    Based on this logic. It is not child abuse for a parent to severely beat it's child as long as the parent "feeds, clothes, bathes, it etc." Do you believe this?

    "Surgery is NOT mutilation" The needless surgical removal of health tissue is mutilation by definition. Get educated.

  • @Nifrayu It's not beating their kids you ignoramus. They haven't even developed the parts of their brains that can discern pain. Needless removal of healthy tissue is not mutilation, it's a surgical procedure, people do it all the time, if you liberal hippies don't want to circumcise your kids don't. But don't forget to protest for the bill on your self-defined "SURGICAL MALPRACTICES" ie. Tatoos, Breast Reduction, Breast Augmentation, Tongue Tie Frenulum removals. Get Deaducated Hippie.

  • @Bleeepism Wow. I say "get educated" You say "Needless removal of healthy tissue is not mutilation" Clearly you don't know the meaning of the word mutilation.

    "Tatoos, Breast Reduction, Breast Augmentation, Tongue Tie Frenulum removals." None of these practices are forced onto children. There is no need to protest against something that doesn't happen.

    Think you for proving my point. You are obviously to uneducated to discuss controversial topics.

    P.S. It's not too late to improve yourself.

  • No words but god made guys like that so they can stay like that.

  • actually it is up to u cause ur the parent and their just babies so they hav no say..

  • @Shandalera1 Are you being sarcastic? Only a heartless monster would think that way.

  • @Shandalera1 Yeah. I agree with you. If my kid had a tongue-tie and it might or might not develop speech issues, what am I going to let a bunch of liberal propagand keep me from the removal of it? It's just crap, people want to appear to care about the youth of the world, why don't they adopt a kid, raise it, NOT CIRCUMCISE IT, and validate their self-righteousness for their neighbors to see, not VLOG about crap that concerns the parents.

  • Comment removed

  • Thanks for making the video. I was circumcised during the US mass circumcision wave of the 1960s-80s. Infant penis sculpting is a sick trend that is in decline. I spared my son.

  • Comment removed

  • its for jews!!

  • @hearv888 Not all jews. Jews are switching to normal dicks today. Jewish Man With Foreskin Speaks Out! video on Youtube

  • America is FUCKED UP, they follow stupid fashion, I cant believe this, Europe FTW

  • you are a fucking idiot. I am circumcised, had my head pierced, and have my wisdom teeth removed. According to you this makes me less of a person? Fuck Off and Die bitch.

  • @CaliThrasher86

    Ahaha She's the idiot?

    Where did "getting my head pierced" and "getting my wisdom teeth mulled" making you "less of a person" come from?

    That was irrelevant. Then you tell her to "fuck off and die."

    I think maybe you should get your 'other' head pierced. Perhaps with a cool looking bullet?

  • Foreskins produce automatic endorphins also so jacking off replaces the endorphins and moisture. So all the spy girls watching me jack off need to suck my dick!  I'm never gonna stop.

  • you are a sweetheart. i wan't to meet an un-shallow girl like you.

  • I think it's a personal choice so I wouldn't have it done to my son. That's the way it is..it's not a birth defect. People argue about cleanliness but that goes for all our body parts with folds/flaps. We learn how to clean them properly.

  • You tell it! I thought when I clicked this video, you would be one of the girls spouting circumcise it, good to hear you are much smarter than that. I feel the way you do my son is intact, I don't believe in it, the dick has a foreskin for a reason. I figured he could have it done later if he wanted, but at 23 he is proud of his turtleneck :)

  • Please continue spreading the word.

  • I am very surprised and glad that so many women are concerned about men. The foreskin is like the sheath of a knife, keeping the blade sharp. Circumcised penises are desensitized, and ejaculation from penis vagina sex is more difficult. In orthodox Judaism and in Islam, the women have the kind of dedication to put up with this

  • Comment removed

  • @icehorse1010 Just because they have autism, means they can cut it off more then a normal kid? Hmm, so boys are born with that foreskin everyday.. and that's how a normal penis looks. Un cut is not normal. I know an autism guy, and guess what? His penis is not ugly! >___< Stupid people. Oh well, i say fuck to everyone on here that is crying boo hoo at you. I am a kid that was saved the horrors of pain. And a cut dick looks ugly. They do and its no joke. Least i have something most don't.

  • Wow stfu

  • The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells,which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies,and antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as the pathogen killing enzyme called lysozyme.All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth,eyelids,vagina,foreskin and anus)are the body's first line of defense against disease.This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanation why intact men are at lower risk of chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases.

  • This video just summed up my views on circumcision. Especially the part about female circumcision. Why people think that's wrong and not male? And any girl who says a foreskin is ugly is a fucking bitch and should be fucking circumcised and see how it feels. Good day.

  • well boobs jobs are not natural either but you still do it! lol

    get over yourself!

  • Hmmmmm. Interesting. lol ;-)

  • ill show you haw a man dick fells

  • blow me leave the gum in ur mouth 

  • If foreskin was unnecessary, men would have evolved without it. If a man cleans himself regularly, it causes no problem.

  • you're so ugly and you should be excised, you will look cleaner

  • I'm circumsized and I like it I wouldn't want to not have a circumsized penis.

  • Thanks for speaking out.

  • Dont american wash their penises? its kept me health so far.lol

  • wow.. i like the passion on which you said it...! n ur right, is wrong.

  • @mybearmingo ---you don't need to be a doctor to know that ripping off a part of a helpless baby's genitalia is wrong. She did fantastic job in speaking up for those who can't! Let an adult male choose to do this, if they wish. I have no problem with that.

  • You are soo right! I'm not circumcised and I have no problems with it and probably never will.

  • I agree, I will NEVER have that done to my baby, and I don't care what anyone says, thinks, or feels about it :/ I just hope that my future husband feels the same... because.. I'm just not getting it done, EVER. Not even his opinion will influence me on this situation. All it is is mutilation :l Ugh...

  • people who believe in circumcision are fucking dumb fuckers.

  • I was circumcised. I'm a victim of genital mutilation.

    Thank you for being logical.

  • @16DeathCore then don't have unprotected sex with people you don't know =) pretty easy I'd say!

  • @xoxduffyxox i dissagree with @16DeathCore i am circumcised. the reason to have circumcision is not healthy reasons. if you're clean you're clean. but if the foreskin doesnt go back then you HAVE to make it cause then it hurts while having sex. so if you heard that circumcision is made so you can reduce the probability for HIV virus and stuff, it's all fake.. you make it so you can have a less pain and better sexual life, cause sex is important in our lives

  • @PanSteevo Me too. I was circumised about a year ago, (i'm 18) because i was sick of my foreskin being tight .i thought the tightness would go away, but as you see i waited from age 14ish for it to do so...but nothing. Was still painful.so off it came, no pain. i admit, it looks and feels better.even if theres less pleasurable sensations compared to most uncircumcised men, its as good for me because honestly i neva actually felt the true pleasure of the foreskin.

  • @Mrkiwidude1 i agree!! feel better or not.. for me witch i couldnt feel good enough the foreskin the pleasure is soooo much better!! and i'm grateful i stepped up and did it... and for those who say it's unnatural [especially women].. plastic surgery is way more unnatural than this but they still do it lol so get a life feel the pleasure and shut up

  • @PanSteevo Well said my friend. And I'd like to point out that @xoxduffyxox made a good analogy with wisdom teeth, if the operation's needed, get it. It's funny because those are the only two operations i've had in my life, yes I had my wisdoms taken out too. lol It seems so far that evolution isnt treating me well...

  • @PanSteevo "plastic surgery is way more unnatural than this but they still do it lol so get a life feel the pleasure and shut up" Nobody puts a child through plastic surgury. Idiot.

  • @Nifrayu assuming from your reply. i guess you had a plastic surgery and you are proud of it.. am i wrong? (no judging btw) lol sr but circumcision is made to avoid some problems, not just to look better.. that's why parents do it to their kids.. if you don't understand that, then it's completely your problem

  • @PanSteevo "am i wrong?" Yes.

    "but circumcision is made to avoid some problems" In medicine it is unethical to remove a childs body parts for preventative reasons alone. We should only cut body parts of if it is medically nessesary. Most circumcisions are preformed when there is no forskin related problem what-so-ever. That is cruel.

  • @Nifrayu i agree if it is not a foreskin-related situation... but not cruel, just wrong.. and stop using others words as answers.. use your own words before calling some1 else an idiot since you can't put your own words in a place to talk.. thank you

  • @PanSteevo "stop using others words as answers." What words are you talking about? That was completely random.

    "i agree if it is not a foreskin-related situation." I am not sure what you mean. Could you rephrase that?

  • @PanSteevo foreskin makes sex easy,why it's there after thousands of years of evolution,how is it possible have a better sex life when you have lost thousands of nerve endings an abilty absorb female vaginal

    secretions, which are then absorbed by the encompassing foreskin. ...thus stimulateing female G spot leading to multiple orgasms,the list is endless,

  • @WiredCountDuckula not all of us make the process of circumcision for 'better pleasure' and bullshit like that! some of us have tight skin.. and tight skin = hard to have sex = blood = pain = fear = psychological problems = you can't have sex again cause you're afraid tht you might go through the process i just explained.. so either you wanna have a dick in ya and shut up or everyone have a foreskin and you will remain horny for ever cause a lot of men have this problem.. take a pick.

  • @16DeathCore Bullshit... You asshole!

  • @16DeathCore Actually no solid evidence has been found yet that foreskin may or may not give or receive a STD or a bacterial infection of any kind.

  • @16DeathC, findings from a few studies designed and performed in Sub-Saharan Africa are not necessarily projectable onto developed nations (like USA).

    After 30 years of the HIV pandemic, there's no evidence at all that uncircumcised American men are more prone to HIV transmission than the circumcised men. Actually, the USA (whose men are about 80% circ'd) has the highest incidence of HIV out of the industrialized nations. But Europe, where circumcision is very uncommon, has the lowest HIV rate.

  • @16DeathCore you do realize you sacrifice one fore another because the vaginal fluid still slips through the slit on the top of the penis.... realistically your comment is retard... I've heard the STD's get trapped under the forskin too... -_- really???

  • Well said. Sad to say that my faith in humanity isn't particularly strong, but it's good to know that there are well-informed people like you around.

  • I think I love you. :) Bahaha brilliant. Not gonna lie, I thought you were gonna say some stupid stuff, but this is great. :)

  • Sign the foreskin restoration petition to show the medical community how important foreskin restoration is. Foreskin restoration can FULLY restore a penis(undo effects of circumcision), but the medical community doesn't want to research it.

    Petition link ------ Petitiononline:com/4restore (replace the : with a .)

  • It's her time of month

  • "I have assisted with about 200 [circumcisions] [...] Babies scream so hard that they end up with their faces red and mouths wide open with no sound coming out. I had to hold their heads to the side because some vomit from the pain. I always had to get close to their faces and stroke their cheeks because they would stop breathing. [...] Consoling is impossible. They shake and their eyes are wide open with panic" After this quote it tells me there is a great deal of pain, just dont remember it.

  • There' no health benifits with it. All you do is get it cut off and it's more of a religion thing and now people think it's what everyones doing but really it's missleading. The people who say there are health benifits and it's better are Jews or they never had a normal penis cause they were babys when it was cut off. So I tottaly agree with this video and your brave to put your opinon out.

  • Thank god us Europeans don't do this shit.

  • circumcission is not just about having a good lookin penis. It's just it might infect your penis having a dirty foreskin full of pee in it it serves as a pee bag

  • @haroldvideos Fucking wash!

  • @haroldvideos Toronto researchers studied near 60,000 boys. The study suggests 195 circumcisions would need to be done to prevent 1 hospital visit for urinary tract infection in the 1st year of life. Since a conservative estimate of the # of significant complications of circumcision is 2-3%, this means that circumcising nearly 200 to prevent 1 urinary infection would result in at least 4 boys suffering a major complication to prevent one easily treatable urinary tract infection. -The Lancet 1998

  • #worldstereotypesofamerica

    Yes, some of our kids are obese. yes we but a shit ton of junk from china... But next time you need military aide, let's see who the world turns to. Exactly, we have power and people are afraid of it. Hmm, sorta sounds like the British when they controlled most of the world, but we did something about it and some people can't get over it... It was over 200 years ago, stop being assholes about it. YES SOME AMERICANS ARE FAT, YOU LOOK AT A POOL MOST KIDS AREN'T.

    I d