crook Charlie Rangle has taken the oath to uphold The Constitution of The United States Republic. His support for a bill or socalled law that is repugnant to the 2nd Amendment constitutes CAPITAL FELONY TREASON. The 2nd Amendment is a constitutional right (not privilege )to bear arms, there are no subsections to support any restrictions. It is unconstitutional to convert a right established by the constitution into a privilege and charge a TAX OR FEE.
The crook Charlie Rangle has committed CAPITAL FELONY TREASON in that he took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. The 2nd amendment does not put any firearms restriction of the people, Mauburt vs. Madison establishes The Constitution of The United States Republic as the SUPREME law of the land. Rangle the scoundrel he is could not get away with this CRAP if the REPUBLIC was not under foreign OCUPATION. PROVE ME WRONG!
@noticalmeff He was cutting out a piece of his frame so the disconnector will clear. I don't own one of these devices but I have seen a few. You can see this cut without the device being put in. It will ruin your frame if you ever go to sell your Glock. Just go pick yourself up a Mac 19/9mm on a form 4.
One will cost you about $3,000 but it is legal and very fun to shoot. Just start a Quicken living trust and you don't have to have a CLEO sign off on it or any of that other stuff. Very easy.
@TheJer1963 Wrong. US Civilians aren't allowed to own machineguns that were made after May 1986 (see the Hughes Amendment - that was voted down but crook Charlie Rangel declared it passed). To do this in the US, you'd not only have to pay the $200 tax stamp, you'd also have to be a dealer in Class III weapons AND have a a legit written request from a military or police agency that they're interested in evaluating a particular machine gun for their use before the transfer can take place.
@rollmasterross: Actually, you're wrong. Mac 10s ARE pre-86 and in many states people use Gun Trusts specifically to avoid CLEO authorization, mainly because CLEOs were being pricks and arbitrarily denying people authorization even though said people were more than qualified and allowed to own one.
@PooPoo2U I never claimed that there were not pre-86 Mac 10s. My point was that there are no pre-86 Glock 18s and while it's technically possible to convert a semi-auto Glock to full-auto, in the US unless you've got your SOT and a demo letter, you're not going to be allowed by law to build it since it'd be built after 86.
NFA Trust = good; Pre-86 built Full-Auto = good ; Post 86 Full-Auto built = better have your SOT and demo letter
@PooPoo2U My original comment was a reply to this post of his that ended with "...So if you do it, plan on keeping your Glock.". If you plan on keeping your Glock, you shouldn't make it full-auto (in the US) without your SOT and Demo letter.
@rollmasterross: People who are going to do it are going to do it. His point was pretty simply that if you do decide to do this don't plan on getting someone to buy it afterward due to the mangling of the host weapon.
I want one just because I like the way it looks. I have a G27. I think full auto may be a bit much for a .40 as well.
b3rtne 1 month ago
crook Charlie Rangle has taken the oath to uphold The Constitution of The United States Republic. His support for a bill or socalled law that is repugnant to the 2nd Amendment constitutes CAPITAL FELONY TREASON. The 2nd Amendment is a constitutional right (not privilege )to bear arms, there are no subsections to support any restrictions. It is unconstitutional to convert a right established by the constitution into a privilege and charge a TAX OR FEE.
firefox8192 2 months ago
how can i get that selector switch? wher and how much?
firefox8192 2 months ago in playlist Fire Arms
The crook Charlie Rangle has committed CAPITAL FELONY TREASON in that he took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. The 2nd amendment does not put any firearms restriction of the people, Mauburt vs. Madison establishes The Constitution of The United States Republic as the SUPREME law of the land. Rangle the scoundrel he is could not get away with this CRAP if the REPUBLIC was not under foreign OCUPATION. PROVE ME WRONG!
firefox8192 3 months ago
THE ONLY GUN LAWS THAT ARE VALID ARE THOSE THAT ARE NOT REPUGNENT TO The Constitution of The United States Republic. Long live The 2nd Amendment.
firefox8192 3 months ago
I want one.
YoungLionDethrone 5 months ago
I WANNA SEE THE BOTTOM OF THE TOP SLIDE, PALLADIUM
JEEZALEO757 5 months ago
hey can you turn the top slide upside down and flip the switch so we can see how it operates? PLEASE
JEEZALEO757 5 months ago
i bought a g17 a couple of months ago and it has that little notch u did with the razor,can i get in trouble for having that since i didnt do it???
nemesis83100 5 months ago in playlist More videos from thepalladium003
Looks easy enough...wish i had one or 2 lol
Kaliryderz 8 months ago
2:49 why did you push it up more. was it just a little loose
bobiscool308 1 year ago
that"s legal ?????????
Juan777fl 1 year ago
who much is one of those
nate6474 1 year ago
where can one get that part?
mtswint 1 year ago
Anyone notice how he had to cut out part of the back of his frame on his gun?
Go try and resell your Glock that has this cut made in it. Think it sells cheap now
just wait till the guy asks "It looks like a piece of the frame has been broken off"
You have to make that cut so the disconnector will work. The gun will not even close
until you make this cut. So if you do it, plan on keeping your Glock.
TheJer1963 1 year ago
what werre you cutting out and where do you buy these
noticalmeff 1 year ago
@noticalmeff He was cutting out a piece of his frame so the disconnector will clear. I don't own one of these devices but I have seen a few. You can see this cut without the device being put in. It will ruin your frame if you ever go to sell your Glock. Just go pick yourself up a Mac 19/9mm on a form 4.
One will cost you about $3,000 but it is legal and very fun to shoot. Just start a Quicken living trust and you don't have to have a CLEO sign off on it or any of that other stuff. Very easy.
TheJer1963 1 year ago
@TheJer1963 Wrong. US Civilians aren't allowed to own machineguns that were made after May 1986 (see the Hughes Amendment - that was voted down but crook Charlie Rangel declared it passed). To do this in the US, you'd not only have to pay the $200 tax stamp, you'd also have to be a dealer in Class III weapons AND have a a legit written request from a military or police agency that they're interested in evaluating a particular machine gun for their use before the transfer can take place.
rollmasterross 1 year ago
@rollmasterross: Actually, you're wrong. Mac 10s ARE pre-86 and in many states people use Gun Trusts specifically to avoid CLEO authorization, mainly because CLEOs were being pricks and arbitrarily denying people authorization even though said people were more than qualified and allowed to own one.
PooPoo2U 7 months ago
@PooPoo2U I never claimed that there were not pre-86 Mac 10s. My point was that there are no pre-86 Glock 18s and while it's technically possible to convert a semi-auto Glock to full-auto, in the US unless you've got your SOT and a demo letter, you're not going to be allowed by law to build it since it'd be built after 86.
NFA Trust = good; Pre-86 built Full-Auto = good ; Post 86 Full-Auto built = better have your SOT and demo letter
rollmasterross 7 months ago
@rollmasterross: The guy wasn't talking about Glocks, he was talking about Macs.
PooPoo2U 7 months ago
@PooPoo2U My original comment was a reply to this post of his that ended with "...So if you do it, plan on keeping your Glock.". If you plan on keeping your Glock, you shouldn't make it full-auto (in the US) without your SOT and Demo letter.
rollmasterross 7 months ago
@rollmasterross: People who are going to do it are going to do it. His point was pretty simply that if you do decide to do this don't plan on getting someone to buy it afterward due to the mangling of the host weapon.
PooPoo2U 7 months ago
do you have to have a class three license to do this
noticalmeff 1 year ago
@noticalmeff legally, YES. Physically no. To do this w/o paying the $600 tax to the ATF will result in a Waco, TX cult prosecution.
BTW, don't believe the janet reno BS. She persecuted many a soul in FL as AG w/ the same montra, it's her stick.
IMO, this is just potential to get caught w/o ammo. Cool to know it's an easy mod.
cheerdiver 1 year ago
.youtube.com/watch?v=SAXRsASZux8
parentalguidance88 1 year ago
wow
parentalguidance88 1 year ago
Do you have a test fire video of the Full auto switch?
joppers77 1 year ago
Watch my other video: written thepalladium003 in Search
thepalladium003 1 year ago
@thepalladium003 I'm guessing you have to have a Class III to have one of these.
bigmanwithagun12 1 month ago
@bigmanwithagun12 No, he is Finnish.
hjjfffaa 1 month ago
nice but where to buy the little pieces
fulldead7 1 year ago
where did you buy the part, how much. did you do all the paper work and them 200 dollars?
morid32 2 years ago