Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What esptein has stated is technically true. But, he is wrong to assume that currency does not require some sort of backing. Furthermore, Gold & Silver are instruments to which ALL countries can measure their currencies against and AGREE upon. epstein is rightfully criticizing neo-liberal politics/economics, yet he contradicts his argument by viewing the rest of the world from a "Ameri-centric" perspective. Countries only care that another countries currency is backed with something they trust.

  • Cancellation of the tangible gold standard gave rise to "floating exchanges" due to the new currency fluctuations. In an attempt to offset these week-to-week (or so) currency fluctuations multi-national companies created in-house financial services. Like a recent Nobel Prize winner in economics said ... ... there should be a money standard, we have a standard for length, mass, volume, time, etc. .... why not for money ?

    Why does a currency have to be overly-devalued ?

  • There's a saying "God makes gold, Man makes money". Gold enforces fiscal discipline/responsibility, something that politicians do not like as evidenced from Nixon's actions. With a tangible money standard, excessive spending on wars and those more-foolish social programs is difficult. When gold was dropped, the US got lazy and preferred the "financial engineering" over the "technical engineering" path (such a shame).

  • THANK YOU for this.

  • @juliaisafilmbuff123 If you aren't already subscribe to the Real News channel. Good stuff.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more