I've tried to add "9/11 Cheney Connections" to my favorites list a half dozen times to no avail. The rebuttal video does add to the favorites list. Never happened with any other video.... Cheney's direct oversight of the training exercises was news to me, 10 years after the fact. Smart video.
hey buddy, have you read securing americas defenses by project for a new american century, israel did 9/11, cheney is israels bitch, just as george bush, furthermore, so is barack obama, muslims had nothing to do with 9/11, jews did
"9/11 Cheney Connections" lists: Means, Motive, and Evidence. In fact criminal investigations list: Means, Motive, and Opportunity. This is a minor quibble with the video which, on the whole, is very good.
occam's razor would direct us to the idea that bush & co. took advantage of 9/11 to attack iraq and remove saddam, not that 9/11 was staged so that there would be a reason to attack iraq.
making it look like mostly saudis and no iraqis attacked us....how would that be a plan to justify an invasion of iraq?
because Saudis have huge connections to the U.S and Iraqis don't. Saudis were used as patsies. more than likely CIA . And they were needed , because someone had to be blamed - and Iraq was then attacked because they said it had wmds. and you and all the U.S bought it - when it was a lie - and we all know it was a lie . It's about control of world oil and they needed an excuse - are you naiive?
Easier to steal the identities from an allied country, set them up as "Al Qaeda" then sell the connection to Iraq. Just my take on it. But when considering ALL the evidence, the US gov. officials with dual Israeli citizenship, the "A Clean Break" and "Rebuilding America's Defenses" documents that detailed the plan for removing Sadaam & dominating Arabs via enhanced relations between Israel & U.S...it becomes much more 'probable' that 911 was a joint U.S./Isreal F.F. op.
@kc0696 "But when considering ALL the evidence..."
funny how your abbreviated list of ALL the evidence has noting to do with actual evidence regarding the hijacking, crashing and building collapses. and I mean that literally, as in it makes me laugh. the cart after the horse is such an easy way to think. like there is no way to exploit a situation that you didn't cause to happen. no inside job, zero evidence, not even close.
The abbreviated list - uhhh, because this is YT with character limits - provides historical context some people have no clue of or choose to ignore which proves elements of our gov./ruling elite have no problem lying to/decieving people & creating conflicts/crises they can profit from. Don't be a pussy, google "proven conspiracies" or "history of false flag op's", grab some popcorn & learn a thing or two. Or...stay trapped in your little box of lies & false reality.
@kc0696 "The abbreviated list - uhhh, because this is YT with character limits" - yes, which is why I characterized it as an abbreviated list. of course as a truther, you take it the wrong way and run with it so you have something to whine about other than the point, which you cannot respond to. next, of course, is the idea that other people need you to tell them about real conspiracies. because unless you're a truther, there is NO WAY you can know about those. you are a clone. a replica. a bore
So you're ignoring the history & how it makes an 'inside job' far more probable than not...then making me out to be a 'know it all' for mentioning it...while also calling me a whiner. Are you kidding? And I'm also a clone?? Ha, that's fine actually. If I'm 'replicating' the efforts of others to expose truth from lies, then I'm right on track. But so you know...you're nothing original dummy. You spend your days trying to fit in with LIARS & TRAITORS to mankind.
"So you're ignoring the history & how it makes an 'inside job' far more probable than not" - you really have no idea how hilarious you are, do you? far more probable? I suppose to a truthtard, this makes sense.
"making me out to be a 'know it all'" - wait. what? you think I'm making you out to be a "know it all"?!? LMAO!! no, you really don't know how unintentionally hilarious you are.
"I'm also a clone?" - completely. like 1000 other truthtards.
@kc0696 in other words, you can't handle any of the FACTS of what happened on 9/11, you're too stupid to understand that one can exploit a situation without creating it, and you've been revealed as another clueless truthtard obsessed with ME because anything other than the specifics of the topic is what you are interested in. assumptions, guesses, leaps of logic, alex jones lies, loose change bullshit, tired old talking points, questions that have been answered...you've got (and are) nothing.
@kc0696 "Fallacies of argumentation...go look it up" - another truthtard classic. morons telling ME to "go look it up" as if they know a single thing (other than the latest line of bullshit to prop up inside job foolishness) I don't. as if I need a lesson on debate or history from the kind of moron who takes jason bermas or alex jones seriously.
99% of truthers are a clone army of idiots with the critical thinking skills of a fart.
stu, like me you are an atheist. you look past the nearly inconceivable number of coincidences that it took for life to crawl out of the primordial soup because you're as sure as I am that the idea of a man in the sky or an unseen power that creates and/or controls all things is absurd.
but somehow a relative handful of coincidences that, linked together by a large number of assumptions that all have to be correct, is too much to see past.
When you study quantum physics you learn that although certain things are probable, that literally anything is possible.
And when you study the past 50 years of illegal CIA false flag operations, American aggression through deceptive foreign policy, and the disregard people like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld have for both human lives or the rule of law, then official complicity in the 9/11 attacks becomes not only possible - but probable.
",,,then official complicity in the 9/11attacks becomes not only possible - but probable."
Then their reaction to the crimes, was as a culprit not a cop. As I said in the other video, the unprecedented pretrial pay out by tax payers??? Only the guilty do that, if I am to believe all the replulsivicans surrounding me, that tell me this about civil court cases.
Who ever has been recorded telling Americans and the world lies, should be locked up.
Don't you mean - "Why do you exercise your American freedom to free speech to expose people who have abused their political power for personal gain?"
Mainly because I take pride in my American duty to seek truth and promote law and order, ensuring freedom for all.
But it is also fun to provoke ignorant hypocritical nutbags who think only with their ideology and believe protecting war criminals is somehow a moral American or Christian value.
I do, sundanceandskye, because what we uncover threatens the world view systems of many, many people. Imagine talking sense to people 2002/9/11. Impossible. Traumatic emotions are very cunningly channeled towards vengeful nationalism and mccarthyism. This was the psychological design of 9/11. It worked. It will work many times in the future. Before we are done educating people, a new ignorant generation emerges ready to be conned into a senseless geopolitical war yet again...
Michael Ledeen is avowed fan of Mussolini, has connections to Ital SISMI and Blackshirts. He hopes for a GLOBAL WAFFEN SS.
Ledeen stated in 1999 that it would be LUCKY and a MIRACLE if America was attacked "like Pearl Harbor". Ron Paul quoted Ledeen's book into the Cong Record in Neo-Conned speech.
Bush made him our a SECURITY consultant. Do you feel secure that a guy who WANTED 9-11 (in his words) "protects" us from terrorism?
Although I find his work increasingly speculative in nature and therefore his sources are more important than his interpretation; Webster Tarpley now has the most comprehensive summary of drills on 9/11 available. (See his book, 'Synthetic Terror') Ofcourse, he draws extensively from Paul Thompson's timeline. He seems also critical of Ruppert, which I don't approve of. Nevertheless, I recommend you his work to get a full picture of the drills and the context of the drills.
Just wanted to mention that I've read Michael Ruppert's book and it looks like you've based your research on his work. (I also see you refer to fromthewilderness) . Well you just mentioned it in your video now too, haha. Keep up the good work.
Thanks. Yes Ruppert was a large influence on my work as well as David Ray Griffin, Peter Dale Scott, and Barrie Zwicker. I have seen Webster Tarpley speak and like his work as well.
But as you point out, in order to maintain credibility we must keep speculation to a minimum and stick to the facts.
I know this comment is old but, here we are in 2011 & some of the same names seem to be at the forefront of what appears to be a rise in consciousness by a large number of US citizens as well as many abroad. My concern is the level of 'gatekeepers' who may be involved in focusing on some 'truth' only to lure people in so that they can be led down a dead end path. Check out 'letsrollforums' for some amazing research on 911 involving fake victims, as proposed in Op Northwoods...
@kc0696 "what appears to be a rise in consciousness by a large number of US citizens" -- laffs. keep telling yourself that the movement is improving, not dying.
"Hey, way to stand for something!" said the truthtard who thinks narcissistic radio hosts who sells paranoia, T-shirts and DVDs knows better than an army of world-class engineers. what is it you stand for? assumptions, wild guesses, laughable leaps of logic, and out-and-out lies. you dont want a new investigation, you want to be told you are right. grow up, little boy. the boogey man isn't real, and life isn't a movie.
Are you referring to Rush Limbaugh?? Ohh, maybe Alex Jones. Is that the best 'guilt by association' you got? Alright...well let's see who we have supporting the OCT: right wing, dark-people hating racists, lying piece of shit poltiicians covering their asses; Zionist psycopaths; military wankers who can't be bothered with the painful details & shills like yourself who are clueless. I don't need anyone to 'tell me I'm right'...the truth tells us all whose right & wrong.
@kc0696 guilt by association? no. believing an obvious liar and idiot and repeating all his silly little bullshit fantasies? yes, that's you.
how much do you like the rampant anti-semitism in the movement? make you feel at home?
but anything to avoid the actual events of the day, right truthtard? ignore the fact that there is ZERO physical evidence. like most truthers I stump, you want to talk about me and anything else but 9/11/01 and what happened that day. so typical. such a clone.
As for LIES...why did Dick Cheney LIE about what time he entered the PEOC? Let's skip the dance & predictiable 'no he didn't'...go look & then explain why.
" the boogey man isn't real"
Congrats...you've finally caught up with the rest of us who know Osama was a CIA asset & NEVER posed an individual threat to the U.S. Either you know you're full of shit for believing he did it or you're still one of the thrity some odd percent who hasn't gotten a clue yet.
hmmm...zero physical evidence of inside job vs. dick cheney this or that....I wonder what the truther wants to concentrate on.
zero physical evidence vs. assumptions and shit that never did quite happen 40 years ago....what will the truther want to talk about?
zero physical evidence or obsessing on unclesamsnephew666 and all the shit you think you know about me (which is nothing)...where will the truther aim the discussion. golly, I wonder which one.
HAHAHA...why not just admit you're a gutless shill? Either that or at least TRY to address something relevant. Cheney LIED about his entry into the PEOC, this would matter in any 'normal' investigation. Comment on that or STFU.
@kc0696 yes, a shill. of course, that must be it. it's all about me, not about the complete lack of physical evidence. and when you ask to address something relevant, by relevant you mean that I'm a shill, right? not that there is no physical evidence. not that northwoods has zero bearing on 9/11. not that like most pathetic truthers, you can't talk about what happened on 9/11 so you swerve, duck and dodge the substance and cry like a twat about me.
(cont.)...& other evidence proving the OCT to be a lie. The site creator Phil Jayhan spoke w/ Griffin several times & could not get his buy in. Just something to consider. Also w/ regards to Ruppert, I'm not sure I buy into the 'peak oil' scare. We know the diamond market for ex. is one in which scarcity is manufactured to keep prices at a premium. This could very well be the case with oil. I don't throw out the baby w/ the bathwater though, Ruppert has done A LOT of good work.
The video you're replying to is a great example of typical 'debunkers' - nothing but generalized emotion based ranting in response to facts and information presented that could puncture the bubble of their fragile reality.
Absolutely! I have written JacobRedWolf and many other debunkers asking them to respond to the information I present connecting Cheney to 9/11. The only one who dared try was ClunkityClunk4truth, the "Obi Wan Kenobi of 9/11 debunking, who failed picking apart a few minor details before quitting and refusing to reply to me.
If these debunkers are so sure they are right then why do they refuse to debate me directly and continue their "all Truthers are liars" rants?
Thanks, I'm glad you liked it. If you haven't seen it already, I'm starting a series on conspiracies called "Stew's Secrets Exposed" which goes into more detail.
The title of the video is "9/11 Cheney Connection" which I made from a report I wrote for my web site, Bradley Infotainment. ( If you Google the site name, go to the site, the report is linked on the left hand side.) There are also reports on the NIST investigation and much more in the "Mayhem" section. In 2004 I wrote and produced a docudrama called "The Proof" and have posted clips from this project on YouTube as well.
Good job- I still think this is the best video about 9-11 on youtube and I've watched alot of them- This is a good vid for people who dismiss 911 truth as crazy- I've changed a few peoples entire way of thinking about 911 by planting this seed-
I've tried to add "9/11 Cheney Connections" to my favorites list a half dozen times to no avail. The rebuttal video does add to the favorites list. Never happened with any other video.... Cheney's direct oversight of the training exercises was news to me, 10 years after the fact. Smart video.
33115566 6 months ago
hey buddy, have you read securing americas defenses by project for a new american century, israel did 9/11, cheney is israels bitch, just as george bush, furthermore, so is barack obama, muslims had nothing to do with 9/11, jews did
jltjr1968 6 months ago
Excellent video, nice work
sstearns34 1 year ago
"9/11 Cheney Connections" lists: Means, Motive, and Evidence. In fact criminal investigations list: Means, Motive, and Opportunity. This is a minor quibble with the video which, on the whole, is very good.
mtracy9 1 year ago
occam's razor would direct us to the idea that bush & co. took advantage of 9/11 to attack iraq and remove saddam, not that 9/11 was staged so that there would be a reason to attack iraq.
making it look like mostly saudis and no iraqis attacked us....how would that be a plan to justify an invasion of iraq?
unclesamsnephew666 2 years ago
because Saudis have huge connections to the U.S and Iraqis don't. Saudis were used as patsies. more than likely CIA . And they were needed , because someone had to be blamed - and Iraq was then attacked because they said it had wmds. and you and all the U.S bought it - when it was a lie - and we all know it was a lie . It's about control of world oil and they needed an excuse - are you naiive?
mooners40 2 years ago
@unclesamsnephew666
Easier to steal the identities from an allied country, set them up as "Al Qaeda" then sell the connection to Iraq. Just my take on it. But when considering ALL the evidence, the US gov. officials with dual Israeli citizenship, the "A Clean Break" and "Rebuilding America's Defenses" documents that detailed the plan for removing Sadaam & dominating Arabs via enhanced relations between Israel & U.S...it becomes much more 'probable' that 911 was a joint U.S./Isreal F.F. op.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 "But when considering ALL the evidence..."
funny how your abbreviated list of ALL the evidence has noting to do with actual evidence regarding the hijacking, crashing and building collapses. and I mean that literally, as in it makes me laugh. the cart after the horse is such an easy way to think. like there is no way to exploit a situation that you didn't cause to happen. no inside job, zero evidence, not even close.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
The abbreviated list - uhhh, because this is YT with character limits - provides historical context some people have no clue of or choose to ignore which proves elements of our gov./ruling elite have no problem lying to/decieving people & creating conflicts/crises they can profit from. Don't be a pussy, google "proven conspiracies" or "history of false flag op's", grab some popcorn & learn a thing or two. Or...stay trapped in your little box of lies & false reality.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 "The abbreviated list - uhhh, because this is YT with character limits" - yes, which is why I characterized it as an abbreviated list. of course as a truther, you take it the wrong way and run with it so you have something to whine about other than the point, which you cannot respond to. next, of course, is the idea that other people need you to tell them about real conspiracies. because unless you're a truther, there is NO WAY you can know about those. you are a clone. a replica. a bore
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
So you're ignoring the history & how it makes an 'inside job' far more probable than not...then making me out to be a 'know it all' for mentioning it...while also calling me a whiner. Are you kidding? And I'm also a clone?? Ha, that's fine actually. If I'm 'replicating' the efforts of others to expose truth from lies, then I'm right on track. But so you know...you're nothing original dummy. You spend your days trying to fit in with LIARS & TRAITORS to mankind.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696
"So you're ignoring the history & how it makes an 'inside job' far more probable than not" - you really have no idea how hilarious you are, do you? far more probable? I suppose to a truthtard, this makes sense.
"making me out to be a 'know it all'" - wait. what? you think I'm making you out to be a "know it all"?!? LMAO!! no, you really don't know how unintentionally hilarious you are.
"I'm also a clone?" - completely. like 1000 other truthtards.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
Fallacies of argumentation...go look it up. You write a lot and say nothing, just attacks and your personal opinion. Done with you.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 in other words, you can't handle any of the FACTS of what happened on 9/11, you're too stupid to understand that one can exploit a situation without creating it, and you've been revealed as another clueless truthtard obsessed with ME because anything other than the specifics of the topic is what you are interested in. assumptions, guesses, leaps of logic, alex jones lies, loose change bullshit, tired old talking points, questions that have been answered...you've got (and are) nothing.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@kc0696 "Fallacies of argumentation...go look it up" - another truthtard classic. morons telling ME to "go look it up" as if they know a single thing (other than the latest line of bullshit to prop up inside job foolishness) I don't. as if I need a lesson on debate or history from the kind of moron who takes jason bermas or alex jones seriously.
99% of truthers are a clone army of idiots with the critical thinking skills of a fart.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
stu, like me you are an atheist. you look past the nearly inconceivable number of coincidences that it took for life to crawl out of the primordial soup because you're as sure as I am that the idea of a man in the sky or an unseen power that creates and/or controls all things is absurd.
but somehow a relative handful of coincidences that, linked together by a large number of assumptions that all have to be correct, is too much to see past.
in the abstract, doesn't that seem odd to you?
unclesamsnephew666 2 years ago
When you study quantum physics you learn that although certain things are probable, that literally anything is possible.
And when you study the past 50 years of illegal CIA false flag operations, American aggression through deceptive foreign policy, and the disregard people like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld have for both human lives or the rule of law, then official complicity in the 9/11 attacks becomes not only possible - but probable.
But that is just my opinion.
stoobradley 2 years ago 2
"probable" -- Laffs!
unclesamsnephew666 2 years ago
thanks for a great post - very important - great work - thousands are dying needlessly- these fake wars need to be stopped
mooners40 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
",,,then official complicity in the 9/11attacks becomes not only possible - but probable."
Then their reaction to the crimes, was as a culprit not a cop. As I said in the other video, the unprecedented pretrial pay out by tax payers??? Only the guilty do that, if I am to believe all the replulsivicans surrounding me, that tell me this about civil court cases.
Who ever has been recorded telling Americans and the world lies, should be locked up.
"no idea they would use planes as missiles"
ISamuelII 2 years ago
Why do you put so much energy into hating America?
BuzzMcTank 2 years ago
Don't you mean - "Why do you exercise your American freedom to free speech to expose people who have abused their political power for personal gain?"
Mainly because I take pride in my American duty to seek truth and promote law and order, ensuring freedom for all.
But it is also fun to provoke ignorant hypocritical nutbags who think only with their ideology and believe protecting war criminals is somehow a moral American or Christian value.
stoobradley 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
"Why do you put so much energy into hating America?"
Why do you put so much energy into denying justice for those killed in the 9 11 attacks?
ISamuelII 2 years ago
Thanks man. excellent presentation and factual.
I do not understand the debunkers hostility to facts
sundanceandskye 3 years ago
I do, sundanceandskye, because what we uncover threatens the world view systems of many, many people. Imagine talking sense to people 2002/9/11. Impossible. Traumatic emotions are very cunningly channeled towards vengeful nationalism and mccarthyism. This was the psychological design of 9/11. It worked. It will work many times in the future. Before we are done educating people, a new ignorant generation emerges ready to be conned into a senseless geopolitical war yet again...
loccysmif 3 years ago 2
On hostility to facts.
1. some 'facts' have turned our wrong, but not yours
2. Hostility of debunkers matches hostility of Bushco to normal investigation response, which Bush said would "interfere with the war on terror".
3. Joy of arrogance?
4. 9-11 described as a BOON to Pentagon, CIA, NSA, etc, Security contractors, Mil-Ind complex, neocon goals, most Repubs, many Dems.
5. Israel CONFIRMED 9-11 was a gift.
Many non-Jew Zionists, and non-Zio Jews.
Debunking 9-11 is threat to Zionism.
dilbertgeg 2 years ago
Why do you love Hitler?
BuzzMcTank 2 years ago
Funny that you should label me as loving Hitler.
Michael Ledeen is avowed fan of Mussolini, has connections to Ital SISMI and Blackshirts. He hopes for a GLOBAL WAFFEN SS.
Ledeen stated in 1999 that it would be LUCKY and a MIRACLE if America was attacked "like Pearl Harbor". Ron Paul quoted Ledeen's book into the Cong Record in Neo-Conned speech.
Bush made him our a SECURITY consultant. Do you feel secure that a guy who WANTED 9-11 (in his words) "protects" us from terrorism?
dilbertgeg 2 years ago 2
Excellent videos you have here stoobradley, they are very informative!! Thank you!
oslexarkun 3 years ago
(Setting the MIHOP/LIHOP discussion aside for a moment)
loccysmif 3 years ago
Although I find his work increasingly speculative in nature and therefore his sources are more important than his interpretation; Webster Tarpley now has the most comprehensive summary of drills on 9/11 available. (See his book, 'Synthetic Terror') Ofcourse, he draws extensively from Paul Thompson's timeline. He seems also critical of Ruppert, which I don't approve of. Nevertheless, I recommend you his work to get a full picture of the drills and the context of the drills.
loccysmif 3 years ago
Just wanted to mention that I've read Michael Ruppert's book and it looks like you've based your research on his work. (I also see you refer to fromthewilderness) . Well you just mentioned it in your video now too, haha. Keep up the good work.
loccysmif 3 years ago
Thanks. Yes Ruppert was a large influence on my work as well as David Ray Griffin, Peter Dale Scott, and Barrie Zwicker. I have seen Webster Tarpley speak and like his work as well.
But as you point out, in order to maintain credibility we must keep speculation to a minimum and stick to the facts.
Thanks again!
stoobradley 3 years ago
@stoobradley
I know this comment is old but, here we are in 2011 & some of the same names seem to be at the forefront of what appears to be a rise in consciousness by a large number of US citizens as well as many abroad. My concern is the level of 'gatekeepers' who may be involved in focusing on some 'truth' only to lure people in so that they can be led down a dead end path. Check out 'letsrollforums' for some amazing research on 911 involving fake victims, as proposed in Op Northwoods...
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 "what appears to be a rise in consciousness by a large number of US citizens" -- laffs. keep telling yourself that the movement is improving, not dying.
it's dying.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
Hey, way to stand for something! Why not just side with Chomsky who says..."even if it was true, who cares". Classic.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696
"Hey, way to stand for something!" said the truthtard who thinks narcissistic radio hosts who sells paranoia, T-shirts and DVDs knows better than an army of world-class engineers. what is it you stand for? assumptions, wild guesses, laughable leaps of logic, and out-and-out lies. you dont want a new investigation, you want to be told you are right. grow up, little boy. the boogey man isn't real, and life isn't a movie.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
Are you referring to Rush Limbaugh?? Ohh, maybe Alex Jones. Is that the best 'guilt by association' you got? Alright...well let's see who we have supporting the OCT: right wing, dark-people hating racists, lying piece of shit poltiicians covering their asses; Zionist psycopaths; military wankers who can't be bothered with the painful details & shills like yourself who are clueless. I don't need anyone to 'tell me I'm right'...the truth tells us all whose right & wrong.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 guilt by association? no. believing an obvious liar and idiot and repeating all his silly little bullshit fantasies? yes, that's you.
how much do you like the rampant anti-semitism in the movement? make you feel at home?
but anything to avoid the actual events of the day, right truthtard? ignore the fact that there is ZERO physical evidence. like most truthers I stump, you want to talk about me and anything else but 9/11/01 and what happened that day. so typical. such a clone.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
As for LIES...why did Dick Cheney LIE about what time he entered the PEOC? Let's skip the dance & predictiable 'no he didn't'...go look & then explain why.
" the boogey man isn't real"
Congrats...you've finally caught up with the rest of us who know Osama was a CIA asset & NEVER posed an individual threat to the U.S. Either you know you're full of shit for believing he did it or you're still one of the thrity some odd percent who hasn't gotten a clue yet.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696
hmmm...zero physical evidence of inside job vs. dick cheney this or that....I wonder what the truther wants to concentrate on.
zero physical evidence vs. assumptions and shit that never did quite happen 40 years ago....what will the truther want to talk about?
zero physical evidence or obsessing on unclesamsnephew666 and all the shit you think you know about me (which is nothing)...where will the truther aim the discussion. golly, I wonder which one.
truthtards! idiots!
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@unclesamsnephew666
HAHAHA...why not just admit you're a gutless shill? Either that or at least TRY to address something relevant. Cheney LIED about his entry into the PEOC, this would matter in any 'normal' investigation. Comment on that or STFU.
kc0696 1 year ago
@kc0696 yes, a shill. of course, that must be it. it's all about me, not about the complete lack of physical evidence. and when you ask to address something relevant, by relevant you mean that I'm a shill, right? not that there is no physical evidence. not that northwoods has zero bearing on 9/11. not that like most pathetic truthers, you can't talk about what happened on 9/11 so you swerve, duck and dodge the substance and cry like a twat about me.
a politician LIED?!!? WOW!! groundbreaking!
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@stoobradley
(cont.)...& other evidence proving the OCT to be a lie. The site creator Phil Jayhan spoke w/ Griffin several times & could not get his buy in. Just something to consider. Also w/ regards to Ruppert, I'm not sure I buy into the 'peak oil' scare. We know the diamond market for ex. is one in which scarcity is manufactured to keep prices at a premium. This could very well be the case with oil. I don't throw out the baby w/ the bathwater though, Ruppert has done A LOT of good work.
kc0696 1 year ago
The video you're replying to is a great example of typical 'debunkers' - nothing but generalized emotion based ranting in response to facts and information presented that could puncture the bubble of their fragile reality.
sstearns34 3 years ago
Absolutely! I have written JacobRedWolf and many other debunkers asking them to respond to the information I present connecting Cheney to 9/11. The only one who dared try was ClunkityClunk4truth, the "Obi Wan Kenobi of 9/11 debunking, who failed picking apart a few minor details before quitting and refusing to reply to me.
If these debunkers are so sure they are right then why do they refuse to debate me directly and continue their "all Truthers are liars" rants?
Thanks for writing!
stoobradley 3 years ago
great work
alboss13 3 years ago
Thanks, I'm glad you liked it. If you haven't seen it already, I'm starting a series on conspiracies called "Stew's Secrets Exposed" which goes into more detail.
Best wishes....... Stew
stoobradley 3 years ago
Well done.. clear consice, great work.
Getitrightstupid 3 years ago 2
One question. What is the name of this documentary and who made it? I find it odd that you have never mentioned what the name of that documentary is.
gamingeagle19 3 years ago
The title of the video is "9/11 Cheney Connection" which I made from a report I wrote for my web site, Bradley Infotainment. ( If you Google the site name, go to the site, the report is linked on the left hand side.) There are also reports on the NIST investigation and much more in the "Mayhem" section. In 2004 I wrote and produced a docudrama called "The Proof" and have posted clips from this project on YouTube as well.
stoobradley 3 years ago
I am furious, are you?
ehswan 3 years ago
Good job- I still think this is the best video about 9-11 on youtube and I've watched alot of them- This is a good vid for people who dismiss 911 truth as crazy- I've changed a few peoples entire way of thinking about 911 by planting this seed-
powderburns9 3 years ago 3
This is probably your best 9-11 Youtube video. I like the way you respond to questions brought up by viewers.
Maybe you group all your 9-11 videos into a playlist by themselves or something.
frankdiddly 3 years ago 3
nicely done
aloongriff 3 years ago