The Sherman had enough armor and a good gun to macth up to the t34 other then bad type of fuel the Sherman was a great tank plus it was cheap and easy to build
@saiien2 Really? The M4 had been Superior in every way to the T-34 except acceleration and fuel efficiency. I'd love to hear you try to say otherwise.
One thing I like about russian weaponry when it comes to games like this is that the majority of most of russia's military weapons all came from blueprints of german weapons. Such as the RPG-7 which has similar design to that of the Panzershreak, idk if I spelled that right, but its really awesome. AK47 which had some similar designs to that of the German MP45, Germany is pretty much reponsible for all modern day weapons, except for t-34 one tank the Tiger could never defeat ^ ^
@FouchJustin191 The tiger could defeat most of the T-34's with ease but once the 85 came it became a bit more of a challenging battle since the T-34/85 had an upgraded gun and even more armor than before but Tigers could still defeat them with some nice placed shots and such.
@FouchJustin191 The tiger is designed for beating the t-34. Tiger is way better tank but the Germans did not have many tigers while the soviets made swarms of t-34's
Actually no offense POM, but the first Panzerschrek sucked because they didn't make the blast shields, so quite a few German soldiers got their faces burned off... The next model was better, but I like the Panzerfaust much better that latter versions of the Panzerschreck...
Actually no offense POM, but the first panzerschrek sucked because they didn't make the blast shields, so quite a few German soldiers got their faces burned off... The next model was better, but I like the Panzerfaust much better that latter versions of the Panzerschreck...
@czechchineseamerican The Panzerfaust was a nice anti-materiale weapon, but up to a certain point of course. The panzschrek it later years wasn't too bad but there were some better alternatives.
@DriftinWolf Well, actually the Panzerfaust was really great at killing tanks, it just lacked a little range. And yes the Panzershrek ended off pretty decent but if I had to take out any model of a crappy Joseph Stalin tank, I would choose the Panzerfaust.
T-34/85 was the best tank of it's size, sure. If the King Tiger had ever been made reliable and mass produceable though, the T-34/85 would most likely have met it's match.
@imaddictedtowow112 with the later 76 mm main cannon it was more formidable against tanks but for the most part Sherman tank tactics revolved around outmaneuvering and flanking enemy tanks in superior numbers, german armor might have been better but it was slower and the Heer coudln't field as many Panver IV's to have a numbers advantage.
The bazooka actually was music instrument.... and because of that the weapon to kill tanks looked so much like the instrument the US government decided to call it a "Bazooka"......
I've just bought this game and I can't play online matches. What i've understod I need some patches, I've alredy downloaded 1.11.31 but I can't install it. please help
@Uburan the sherman was a pretty average medium tank for it's time, although sub-par to it's German counterparts the sherman's strength was that it was cheap and that America could mass produce a whole lot of them, America wasn't the superpower renown for it's cutting edge technology and superior firepower back then like it is now.
@Uburan Sherman tanks were not named very well, Sherman was a ruthless general and the Firefly is perhaps the only one that can stand up to that reputation. Meanwhile the T-34 models were arguably the best ones of all time...
@czechchineseamerican well the German battle tank could not operate in the cold ( i think you know that) but when the T-34 had the 76mm it could fight back Panther tank and Panzer tanks.
@Uburan Well, except the 76mm had trouble with the thick, up to 110mm sloped Panther Armor, but it killed other Panzers but the T-34/85 could stand up to a Panther.
@czechchineseamerican i just want to tell you i don't specialize in second world war history i prefer to look at the strategy's preformed in different ages of military history so i only say what i have researched or i have be told. (not saying you are) i'm not one of the people that go on Wikipedia or something similar
i think its just a T-34 was better all round tank the the Sherman.
@Uburan Of course, I was agreeing with that statement, you're preaching to the choir (wow, such an old term) anyways, I agree because the Sherman as a tank sucked and I completely agree that the T-34 was perhaps one of the greatest tanks of all time. :D
@Uburan Agreed. More sloped armor and the gun was a lot nicer than the Sherman's, well the Firefly's gun was a quite effective gun and could be comparable to the T-34, maybe. But yes, all around the T-34 was better than the Sherman.
@DriftinWolf Also, dont forget, the t34-85 was lightyears better that the t34-76, so if you are comparing the sherman firefly, you should compare it with the t34-85 because they were both improvements of an existing tank.
@Uburan I agree, it never failed as a tank, it may be kinda weird and ugly looking. but its beautiful to me and they made so many of them and it was so effective in combat, that it actually remained in the soviet military up until its collapse in 1991
@Uburan No it wasn't..th M4 had better armor, a better gun, better optics, a vertical stabilizer, three times the depression and cost less money. The T-34 only had better mobility..wtf..learn somthing about the tank..
@Uburan In terms of track size, the 85mm gun and the ability to be produced on a mass scale i would agree. However, i believe that the training of the average sherman crew would have surpassed the ablility's of a T-34 crew. Still a big fan of the T-34 tho :)
What are some tactics to take out a T29 and Pershing? Cuz my dad and I had some 3v3 the other day and our opponent had 2 of each haha....my King Tiger was bouncing rounds like a hoe off the front of both.
Don't feel bad, it pisses me off too that they added prototypes and even 100% fake equipment for balance. USA simply had no good tanks during WW2, Pershing was slower and less reliable than the Tigers, and never made it to the front in numbers.
My suggestion is to engage frontally with Heavy Tanks, then flank with Panthers or infantry with AT grenades or Panzershreks/Panzerfausts
the problem with this game is the uber tanks, they are invincible from the front, and as the map is square and usualy 3v3 4v4 5v5 there is no room to flank.
so the start of the game there are lots of tactics and movement, but late game is just a row of uber tanks sat still, with autoaim enabled, just killing everything (except other uber tanks) and it becomes a complete stalemate unless you move (and by moving forward, you lose your tank)
Its not that they "couldn't" beat them, they were forced to pull out by increase public protest against the war. Had the United States diverted all resources to actually winning the war and went through with it, they would have won the war, albeit with pretty heavy casualties.
Just so you know, the US Marines kill death ratio over there was 9:1, so its not like the Viet Cong kicked their ass or anything. Its just that American civilian mentality on war was different from that of the Vietnamese.
Actually, it does, considering there were 1,100,000 deaths for the NVA. The difference between the two are the types of governments. In North Vietnam, its not like a dictator is going to stop because the public is upset that soldiers died, whereas the US is a democracy and have to listen to the public.
Just because we pulled out, doesn't make us the weaker fighting force.
never said you were a weaker fighting force, but you americans, or atleast some of you are incredibly arrogant when it comes to war.
1,100,000 deaths, how many of those do you think were civillian, not all but a lot would have been. But pulling out was a bad idea regardless of public opinion, because after the Tet Offensive the NVA and VC were essentially decimated, so victory wouldn't have been hard to achieve after that.
The whole vietnam thing was a response to someone claiming the soviet union was weak for GAINING ground in the finnish winter war in 1940. Said person is an American so i thought it was fitting to point out Vietnam, a war which America likes to pretend didn't happen.
no we werent we lost 58,000 out of about 3 million i the viet kong general even said 10 of his troops per every 1 american and we lost politically not militarily and was always an unfair battle considering the america were always outnumber and either way their was no reason to be their in the first place and it really doesnt matter now because thats american history and we have learned from it and pretty much moved on and besides do u think the u.k. would have fared any better
So when america loses it's pointless history, but the original argument started because an american was attacking the soviet union for their war with finland, but you won't describe that as "pointless history" will you.
uhhh no because i dot give a shit about a fallen empire the reason i say its pointless their was no point to that war it its was retarded same with iraq and afghanistan
America really wasn't prepared for the kind of military conflict they encountered in Vietnam. However, keep in mind that the US Marines still had an 8 to 1 kill death ratio, which is ridiculously good.
I totally agree with you that we lost politically and not militarily. We would have wiped out the Viet Cong and NVA if we stayed in Nam.
Its not so much how fast our soldiers were dying as much as the way our public reacted to the death of soldiers. It sounds cruel, but a North Vietnamese life simply wasn't worth as much to the Vietnamese generals as an American life was to the American public. The Vietnamese mentality towards the war was much more different than the Americans.
The American public didn't believe in getting themselves tangled in foreign conflicts, and protested, though. So we had to pull out.
i played this map only once. we agreed to only infantry. i was moving through the open field (big mistake in itself) with a large amount of riflemen and submachine gunners and a few machine gunners about 6 squads of each except the machine gunners i think i had 3. so all these men are moving to the end of the field and a bunch of his machine gunners open fire on them and cut all of them to shreds.
why will you never show your face online i wana see you so i can kill you (joke) plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz show your face on one off your vidzzz name it prince of mac... shows face
PrinceOfMacedon what kind of games would you recommend as a real time game such as Men of War, and are they really that interesting?, is it worth the money?
yo prince im gonna get this game tommorrow but i need to ask is there alot of freaking trashtalkers like on rtw i got that game and people are always trash talking just wanted to know plez respond
Boy, that bazookaman got the full wrath of the IS-1. A main cannon shot at point blank range.
Wildcat425B 4 months ago
The Sherman had enough armor and a good gun to macth up to the t34 other then bad type of fuel the Sherman was a great tank plus it was cheap and easy to build
stinger913 4 months ago
Your opponent needs more numbers in his screen name.
ShiningNow 4 months ago
stupid
marjanovic47 6 months ago
U.S.A U.S.A
vSxL3G3ND 9 months ago
@vSxL3G3ND, USA, Commonwealth and Japan sucks, best tanks and technology have Soviet Union and Germany.
saiien2 9 months ago
Comment removed
XxxSakura101 8 months ago
@saiien2 Really? The M4 had been Superior in every way to the T-34 except acceleration and fuel efficiency. I'd love to hear you try to say otherwise.
XxxSakura101 8 months ago
One thing I like about russian weaponry when it comes to games like this is that the majority of most of russia's military weapons all came from blueprints of german weapons. Such as the RPG-7 which has similar design to that of the Panzershreak, idk if I spelled that right, but its really awesome. AK47 which had some similar designs to that of the German MP45, Germany is pretty much reponsible for all modern day weapons, except for t-34 one tank the Tiger could never defeat ^ ^
FouchJustin191 11 months ago
@FouchJustin191
agree @ MP45 u mean stg 44?
westsidestyler42 9 months ago
@FouchJustin191 The panzershreck was a copy of the american bazooka, so that's kind of a stupid argument.
leonenaj 9 months ago
@FouchJustin191 The tiger could defeat most of the T-34's with ease but once the 85 came it became a bit more of a challenging battle since the T-34/85 had an upgraded gun and even more armor than before but Tigers could still defeat them with some nice placed shots and such.
DriftinWolf 9 months ago
@FouchJustin191 The tiger is designed for beating the t-34. Tiger is way better tank but the Germans did not have many tigers while the soviets made swarms of t-34's
redpaw550 8 months ago
you were REALLY lucky that you destroyed that IS-2 with one shot from a sherman. normally, a kingtiger is equal to the IS-2
TheBluecow12 11 months ago
you were REALLY lucky that you destroyed that IS-2 with one shot from a sherman. normally, a kingtiger is equal to the sherman.
TheBluecow12 11 months ago
i guess the beginning of the war...so the Soviets are the cause AGAIN
but i like the vid
8900609 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually no offense POM, but the first Panzerschrek sucked because they didn't make the blast shields, so quite a few German soldiers got their faces burned off... The next model was better, but I like the Panzerfaust much better that latter versions of the Panzerschreck...
czechchineseamerican 1 year ago
Actually no offense POM, but the first panzerschrek sucked because they didn't make the blast shields, so quite a few German soldiers got their faces burned off... The next model was better, but I like the Panzerfaust much better that latter versions of the Panzerschreck...
czechchineseamerican 1 year ago
@czechchineseamerican The Panzerfaust was a nice anti-materiale weapon, but up to a certain point of course. The panzschrek it later years wasn't too bad but there were some better alternatives.
DriftinWolf 11 months ago
@DriftinWolf Well, actually the Panzerfaust was really great at killing tanks, it just lacked a little range. And yes the Panzershrek ended off pretty decent but if I had to take out any model of a crappy Joseph Stalin tank, I would choose the Panzerfaust.
czechchineseamerican 11 months ago
T-34/85 was the best tank of it's size, sure. If the King Tiger had ever been made reliable and mass produceable though, the T-34/85 would most likely have met it's match.
bgdancer100 1 year ago
of course the bazookaman has to be black
JohannesTheHot 1 year ago
@JohannesTheHot so what?... fuck niggers I'm racist and I dont mind a black but niggers are different
imaddictedtowow112 1 year ago
What's da name of the map please???!!
EMEEEEPIRE 1 year ago
lol nice beginning
asdasd3056 1 year ago
LOL nationalism.
superyerfdog 1 year ago
Sherman pro and cons
+speed
+able to flank heavier vehicles
+Deadly against infantry
-Weak main gun
-light armor
-couldnt take a medium armored tank from the front.
imaddictedtowow112 1 year ago
@imaddictedtowow112 with the later 76 mm main cannon it was more formidable against tanks but for the most part Sherman tank tactics revolved around outmaneuvering and flanking enemy tanks in superior numbers, german armor might have been better but it was slower and the Heer coudln't field as many Panver IV's to have a numbers advantage.
GeradAkkdesu 1 year ago
bf1942... nice
elankahana 1 year ago
most strategic game ever made
crazyhillbillies 1 year ago
we need to play each other....justchillin654 my account if u got steam
youngmony3 1 year ago
lol its the cold war
kitchsc 1 year ago
i am your gratest fan i get all my tatics from you
MrCivilwarlogan 1 year ago
prince i do belave it was called the panzerfast (tank fist) unless if there are two types (my grandpa told me about the panzerfast
andrewceg 1 year ago
@andrewceg it is called a "Panzer Faust" which translated mean "tank Fist"
GambleDwarf100 1 year ago
@GambleDwarf100 thanks for the spelling yes i know it means tank fist my grandpa was in the German army in ww2 he was a Sargent
andrewceg 1 year ago
@andrewceg google panzershreck, panzerfaust is the old ineffective one, older than the bazookas
HarmenBR 1 year ago
you never use artillery your battle would take half the time with artillery :L
patty0100 1 year ago
*It was a musical instrument....
kllerbill99 1 year ago
The bazooka actually was music instrument.... and because of that the weapon to kill tanks looked so much like the instrument the US government decided to call it a "Bazooka"......
LOVE YOUR VIDS!!
kllerbill99 1 year ago
LOVE YOUR CLIPS!
xerone10 1 year ago
i really love tanks but im to tall to be in one=(
GameKing250 1 year ago
afghanistan vs usa
DAZ DAZZ DAZZZ BOOMMMM
usa loser
hehehe
zo0mmax 1 year ago
lol nice intro
justinxuu 2 years ago
why you never fix the track on your tank?
NoxNoctisUmbra 2 years ago
I've just bought this game and I can't play online matches. What i've understod I need some patches, I've alredy downloaded 1.11.31 but I can't install it. please help
mattemuppen 2 years ago
t-34 was a better alround tank then the Sherman US tank
Uburan 2 years ago 37
@Uburan but it sux big time to be a t-34 crew
neostarcraft 1 year ago
@Uburan not reeally true. their armor was pretty much equal, as was their speed and gun. T34 also didnt have an electric turret.
Guynumber7 1 year ago
@Uburan the Americans designed the t-34 and the Sherman tank was made to fight in groups not 1 on 1
Jakeycoolman 1 year ago
@Jakeycoolman "the Americans designed the t-34" >_ >
bltnxkrw 1 year ago
@Uburan Why in men-of-war do you never use artillery?
yoyo007008 1 year ago
well if the russians didnt invent the t-34, they would of lost
TheDARIEN54321 1 year ago
@Uburan T34 with the 85 was the best tank of its time.
halo101112 1 year ago
@Uburan the sherman was a pretty average medium tank for it's time, although sub-par to it's German counterparts the sherman's strength was that it was cheap and that America could mass produce a whole lot of them, America wasn't the superpower renown for it's cutting edge technology and superior firepower back then like it is now.
GeradAkkdesu 1 year ago
@GeradAkkdesu well i guess it was quantity instead of quality but now America have both.
Uburan 11 months ago
@Uburan Sherman tanks were not named very well, Sherman was a ruthless general and the Firefly is perhaps the only one that can stand up to that reputation. Meanwhile the T-34 models were arguably the best ones of all time...
czechchineseamerican 1 year ago
@czechchineseamerican well the German battle tank could not operate in the cold ( i think you know that) but when the T-34 had the 76mm it could fight back Panther tank and Panzer tanks.
Uburan 11 months ago
@Uburan Well, except the 76mm had trouble with the thick, up to 110mm sloped Panther Armor, but it killed other Panzers but the T-34/85 could stand up to a Panther.
czechchineseamerican 11 months ago
@czechchineseamerican i just want to tell you i don't specialize in second world war history i prefer to look at the strategy's preformed in different ages of military history so i only say what i have researched or i have be told. (not saying you are) i'm not one of the people that go on Wikipedia or something similar
i think its just a T-34 was better all round tank the the Sherman.
Uburan 11 months ago
@Uburan Of course, I was agreeing with that statement, you're preaching to the choir (wow, such an old term) anyways, I agree because the Sherman as a tank sucked and I completely agree that the T-34 was perhaps one of the greatest tanks of all time. :D
czechchineseamerican 11 months ago
@czechchineseamerican thank you agreeing. but im not preaching you started by talikng abount the name of the tank not about my comment.
Uburan 11 months ago
@Uburan Ok, geez, it's just a buried phrase that I have decided to let remain at rest...
czechchineseamerican 11 months ago
@Uburan Agreed. More sloped armor and the gun was a lot nicer than the Sherman's, well the Firefly's gun was a quite effective gun and could be comparable to the T-34, maybe. But yes, all around the T-34 was better than the Sherman.
DriftinWolf 11 months ago
@DriftinWolf Also, dont forget, the t34-85 was lightyears better that the t34-76, so if you are comparing the sherman firefly, you should compare it with the t34-85 because they were both improvements of an existing tank.
leonenaj 9 months ago
@Uburan I agree, it never failed as a tank, it may be kinda weird and ugly looking. but its beautiful to me and they made so many of them and it was so effective in combat, that it actually remained in the soviet military up until its collapse in 1991
FouchJustin191 11 months ago
@Uburan No it wasn't..th M4 had better armor, a better gun, better optics, a vertical stabilizer, three times the depression and cost less money. The T-34 only had better mobility..wtf..learn somthing about the tank..
XxxSakura101 8 months ago
@Uburan In terms of track size, the 85mm gun and the ability to be produced on a mass scale i would agree. However, i believe that the training of the average sherman crew would have surpassed the ablility's of a T-34 crew. Still a big fan of the T-34 tho :)
Heratic88 8 months ago
@Uburan Plus they could manufacture many more in the same amount of time and for the same amount of money.
11Sparky111 5 months ago
do some close ups
milke29 2 years ago
nice video
oliverdanieleteotico 2 years ago
i got it for 5$ from ebay
they totally screwd me though
sydamandude 2 years ago
What are some tactics to take out a T29 and Pershing? Cuz my dad and I had some 3v3 the other day and our opponent had 2 of each haha....my King Tiger was bouncing rounds like a hoe off the front of both.
CMDRFandragon 2 years ago
Engage frontally with a Tiger and then use a Panther to outflank it.
PkayerZxz2 2 years ago
Ive since then figured out you just hit it on the Hull w/ a KIng Tiger gun also...its only got 100 on its hull =D
CMDRFandragon 2 years ago
if i were about to get captured by a merciless enemy id grab one of my grenades hide pull the pin and blow me and my captors to hell
M1A1HeavyTank 2 years ago
@M1A1HeavyTank
Don't feel bad, it pisses me off too that they added prototypes and even 100% fake equipment for balance. USA simply had no good tanks during WW2, Pershing was slower and less reliable than the Tigers, and never made it to the front in numbers.
My suggestion is to engage frontally with Heavy Tanks, then flank with Panthers or infantry with AT grenades or Panzershreks/Panzerfausts
PkayerZxz2 2 years ago
@PkayerZxz2 the t29 was a real experimntle tank dering ww2
MrGolieth 2 years ago
Shut up you idiot kid. You can't even speak English properly, don't talk to me about history. The T29 isn't even in MoW, they have the T26 Pershing.
PkayerZxz2 2 years ago
@PkayerZxz2 Eh, the T29 was an experimental tank that never saw the light of day. It is in MoW if you got your game up to date.
turbooggyboy 2 years ago
I didn't have the newest patch when I posted that comment. I know know that the T29 is in MoW.
PkayerZxz2 2 years ago
@PkayerZxz2 Yeah, I thought so. It's awesome =)
turbooggyboy 2 years ago
what the hell is pounds?
skippy9871 2 years ago
skippy9871: its the currency in England
ugaboj 2 years ago 2
you mean the currency of britain
AndyMcCy 2 years ago
You don't know what pouds are? They're the same as quid, duh.
HitodamaKyrie 2 years ago
i really want to get this, is it a good game for around £25?
punchyourjeans 2 years ago
you can get men of war for 15 pounds from Steam
Lordmark1234 2 years ago
sounds good, i will check it out, thanks.
punchyourjeans 2 years ago
How long are these games, i mean the timer
KrakFoxx 2 years ago
nooooo american hellcat or pershing OR m10 could kik its @ss
Agomongo1235 2 years ago
what was with the starting video that was kinda weird don't you think??
PatriotGabe 2 years ago
the problem with this game is the uber tanks, they are invincible from the front, and as the map is square and usualy 3v3 4v4 5v5 there is no room to flank.
so the start of the game there are lots of tactics and movement, but late game is just a row of uber tanks sat still, with autoaim enabled, just killing everything (except other uber tanks) and it becomes a complete stalemate unless you move (and by moving forward, you lose your tank)
sacriel42 2 years ago
was the t-29 a real Americsan tank or did they just invent it for the game????
dcsmith5100 2 years ago
experimental tank that never saw combat
sacriel42 2 years ago
this game is good. whats it called?
runescapewizz 2 years ago
Men of War Online
EhSteve8690 2 years ago
men of war
dcsmith5100 2 years ago
Read the title dipshit
moomooman123456 2 years ago
i love the Sovites! kill the american german loving penis with ears
PacificRoman2 2 years ago
ok..................
n1c3g01ng 2 years ago
...
MrCr0wely 2 years ago
gay. The Soviets were skinned alive by Finland. They couldn't even beat Finland. THEY COULD NOT BEAT FINLAND.
Americans own all.
tik999 2 years ago
The americans were skinned alive by Vietnam. They couldn't eveb beat Vietnam. THEY COULD NOT BEAT VIETNAM.
Heh, thats what ignorance gets you tik999.
Simmons181 2 years ago
Its not that they "couldn't" beat them, they were forced to pull out by increase public protest against the war. Had the United States diverted all resources to actually winning the war and went through with it, they would have won the war, albeit with pretty heavy casualties.
Just so you know, the US Marines kill death ratio over there was 9:1, so its not like the Viet Cong kicked their ass or anything. Its just that American civilian mentality on war was different from that of the Vietnamese.
ISeeTallPeople 2 years ago
suppose the whole 9:1 thing explains the 58'000 american dead doesn't it.
Simmons181 2 years ago
Actually, it does, considering there were 1,100,000 deaths for the NVA. The difference between the two are the types of governments. In North Vietnam, its not like a dictator is going to stop because the public is upset that soldiers died, whereas the US is a democracy and have to listen to the public.
Just because we pulled out, doesn't make us the weaker fighting force.
ISeeTallPeople 2 years ago
never said you were a weaker fighting force, but you americans, or atleast some of you are incredibly arrogant when it comes to war.
1,100,000 deaths, how many of those do you think were civillian, not all but a lot would have been. But pulling out was a bad idea regardless of public opinion, because after the Tet Offensive the NVA and VC were essentially decimated, so victory wouldn't have been hard to achieve after that.
Simmons181 2 years ago 2
@Simmons181
US never lost a major battle in Vietnam... they just lost the support of the congress...
Rob7194 2 years ago
The whole vietnam thing was a response to someone claiming the soviet union was weak for GAINING ground in the finnish winter war in 1940. Said person is an American so i thought it was fitting to point out Vietnam, a war which America likes to pretend didn't happen.
Simmons181 2 years ago 2
no we werent we lost 58,000 out of about 3 million i the viet kong general even said 10 of his troops per every 1 american and we lost politically not militarily and was always an unfair battle considering the america were always outnumber and either way their was no reason to be their in the first place and it really doesnt matter now because thats american history and we have learned from it and pretty much moved on and besides do u think the u.k. would have fared any better
goddifist 2 years ago
So, speaking millitarily, which army LEFT the country.
Simmons181 2 years ago 2
america so we didnt lose by military defeat we left becuase their was no point soooooooooo ur arguing about pointless history
goddifist 2 years ago
So when america loses it's pointless history, but the original argument started because an american was attacking the soviet union for their war with finland, but you won't describe that as "pointless history" will you.
Simmons181 2 years ago 10
uhhh no because i dot give a shit about a fallen empire the reason i say its pointless their was no point to that war it its was retarded same with iraq and afghanistan
goddifist 2 years ago
America really wasn't prepared for the kind of military conflict they encountered in Vietnam. However, keep in mind that the US Marines still had an 8 to 1 kill death ratio, which is ridiculously good.
I totally agree with you that we lost politically and not militarily. We would have wiped out the Viet Cong and NVA if we stayed in Nam.
ISeeTallPeople 2 years ago
the other why is that how fast they were dying the soldiers were dying i don't know how fast but i think that kinda contributed too
on why we pulled... i don't know its just a thought
goddifist 2 years ago
Its not so much how fast our soldiers were dying as much as the way our public reacted to the death of soldiers. It sounds cruel, but a North Vietnamese life simply wasn't worth as much to the Vietnamese generals as an American life was to the American public. The Vietnamese mentality towards the war was much more different than the Americans.
The American public didn't believe in getting themselves tangled in foreign conflicts, and protested, though. So we had to pull out.
ISeeTallPeople 2 years ago
well nothing we can do about it now besides america has better thing to worry about like the useless war in afghanistan and iraq
goddifist 2 years ago
thk you for clariflying it but we go crazy wen 5 soldiers are killed
dsettleascii 2 years ago
actaully it is the other way around. americans took the bazooka from the germans and made it better
Hawk88568 2 years ago
nope thats wrong dude
thewhulk 2 years ago
americans had inferior tanks so they needed superior infantry AT weapons. Bazooka is newer and better than the Panzershrek
Hawk88568 2 years ago
the germans captured the bazooka and made into the Panzershreck
runescapewizz 2 years ago
@hawk88568: your right thewhulk and runescapewizz are wrong
lennongoodle 2 years ago
i played this map only once. we agreed to only infantry. i was moving through the open field (big mistake in itself) with a large amount of riflemen and submachine gunners and a few machine gunners about 6 squads of each except the machine gunners i think i had 3. so all these men are moving to the end of the field and a bunch of his machine gunners open fire on them and cut all of them to shreds.
xXxRustyxrevengexXx 2 years ago
lol love the beginning thx i needed that today!
Mrgoose87 2 years ago
WTF is that pre video all about lol
andreyoung06 2 years ago
lmfao he punch him
krogaan 2 years ago
nice vid
sargentkev99 2 years ago
Damn,I need to remember to try that T-29.Thing seems to be pretty good.
Shadowolf05 2 years ago
Good Vid.
XCalibrez 2 years ago
just like in chess combined arms is always best tactic.../milwaukee
rocketshipstud2 2 years ago
oh snap ur guy got donkey punched at the beginning !!!
ZackNTW2 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
why will you never show your face online i wana see you so i can kill you (joke) plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz show your face on one off your vidzzz name it prince of mac... shows face
man7094 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
stop posting this comment on all of his vids, what are you some kind of stalker??
josh96321 2 years ago 6
lmao at thestart the both have Armored cars with MGs on top and the get out of the car and have them self a fist fight.. JUST LIKE IN REAL LIFE!
thewhulk 2 years ago
this is like what would have happened had Patton been able to fight the soviets back.
GeneralBelesarius 2 years ago
lmao nice beginng
jpogrossi778 2 years ago
wow they should rename the game Tanks of War!!!
briandaboss4lif 2 years ago
someone help........everytime i click on a game/room join game never higlights and i have to create my own room in order to play....and suggestions?
HoTpOcKeTs13579 2 years ago
ok thanks, and tis a shame it ends before napoleonic times. i love master and commander far side of the world. ;)
bloodshot16 2 years ago
im guessing the american soldier was drunk as it looked like the soviet tried to avoid being hit
frostscythe66 2 years ago 12
what is this game rated btw?
BoogleMeister93 2 years ago
I bought this game becasu of prince soook thanks prince this game rocks!
XmAsischristmas 2 years ago 2
this is sro much better then total wa
spoonofdeath4 2 years ago
ya i agre way better but thats just my opinion just got it today beacuse of prince rock on man
ZACKMCMAHON 2 years ago
lol at the beginning! ROAD RAGE!!!
Solarian2495 2 years ago 3
Hahaha! the guys in the intro beating each other up! I love it.
DaBrickMastah 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Play Empire Total War Make A Vid
Simmelra 2 years ago
dont ask him to play etw look at his profile to see why
DoomAgeding 2 years ago
PrinceofMacedon,
Would love to play against you, I'm a big MoW fan. Any reason you play 1 v 1 combat on such large maps?
grey2ham 2 years ago
PrinceOfMacedon what kind of games would you recommend as a real time game such as Men of War, and are they really that interesting?, is it worth the money?
BenRules2K9 2 years ago
So prince(or anyone else), do u recommend this game, is it worth the money?
Redraptorxx 2 years ago
great game (again),
do you know how to repair now or not??? XD
and can you do some more infantry battles?
jaspersema 2 years ago
dude, I've always known how to repair stuff - I even showed myself repairing a tank in the last video lol
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
hey prince of macedon im a fan and i have a request not for an army but to ask if u could make more wmpire total war games thanks for readin
iteen99 2 years ago
nope - you can read my profile to see why
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
Prince its really funny I just bought this like 2 weeks ago. I go on youtube not long after getting and you have videos about this lol.
ChancellorLott06 2 years ago
yo prince im gonna get this game tommorrow but i need to ask is there alot of freaking trashtalkers like on rtw i got that game and people are always trash talking just wanted to know plez respond
ZACKMCMAHON 2 years ago
There haven't been any trashtalkers (period). There's some arrogant people, but I haven't seen any thugs. Thuggery is a Rome Total War issue.
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
Errm where is 6-7? :P
Drainege 2 years ago
I'm not gonna waste my time making a video for every single battle I play lol
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
lol looks like you're having a lot of fun with this game.
aceblazer25 2 years ago
yeah, man, this game is really fun - and there's been no thugs online screwing up the game
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
man prince i love these men of war battles plezz keep it up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ZACKMCMAHON 2 years ago
thanks, man =)
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
hehe nice battle dude!
Have a smiley :)
IthacanKing 2 years ago
thanks ;)
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
i thout it was the number fore the video like episodes
not the actual battle number
caly4000 2 years ago
no, if you read the title, it's very deliberate: it's online battle #008. It's not my 8th video. It's my 8th online battle (for Men of War).
I label my titles very specifically lol
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago
My bad ;)
Thats what i thought too ;D
Oh well, Bring on a german game! :p
Drainege 2 years ago
I do have a German battle, but you won't see it for another 3-4 videos. Soon, you will see the Japanese though =)
PrinceofMacedon 2 years ago