There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
That is a beautiful sight! It takes me about 5 hours to go 300 miles in a car, it takes them 18 seconds to travel between those points. Its not fair! lol
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
shut the fuck up you dumb ass mother fucker. talk all big bad on youtube trying to start shit when i wasnt even talking to you. i bet you sit at your computer just looking through videos and reading the comments to see if you can start shtit out of nothing, cause it makes you feel all badass and tough. suck a dick bitch.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the reality is that no one can explain how it would be possible to get in outer space; but almost everyone cannot dissagree with the propaganda that exagerates to the max the powers of the nations, disagree with the authority is a healthy reaction
while all these space flights are truely impossible, the public doubts, doesn't dare to express it, and feel strange and weak in front of the authority
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the problem is that you need all these explanations to explain simple things, these questions we ask those "scientists" because we don't understand are not answered, the explations are super refined excuses to explain what is impossible, those guys are payed to explain the power of the nations, to reinforce national unity and social peace, to let the public in wonder in front of what they don't understand,
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
nasa science is fake, it is based on german idealism principles, kant, einstein were selling you their religion, they were trying to explain a god with the means of philosophy and physics, their systems are artificial and against all reality, a physicist should explain reality and NOT unreality, it is not his job, how long will you believe that time goes at different speeds IN THE REAL WORLD
here in toronto ...right inside our very own subway stations there are large posters or bulletins which picture a New York police officer with a bell solo cellphone with the words '9-11 was an insider ' right on hid necktie!for cryin' out loud! (the add btw was for Bell solo...)
i don't make these things up...the add was posed up for about a month, then taken down and replaced by another add for some other vacation resort etc...this same add was also posted inside the train cars, but had nothing written on the NY city officers necktie, only the larger poster did ...
so...what are u suggesting?... that it's all a conspiracy to make us believe that 'man' himself is God since he can build or engineer all these wonderful things?
Yeah, Columbia blew up because there was a hole in the left wing because of foam from the external tank hitting it during lift off. Engineers saw it and requested the administration to do something like this, To check the shuttle. They said no because it would be to expensive, and cause further delays. 9000 degree plasma entered the hole during re-entry, causing the landing gear tires to explode and a chair reaction through the orbiter. 7 lives later, lesson finally learned.
I understand what you're saying, but to be fair, they had no real way to fix the hole in the heat shield. Searching for a hole that *might* be there would have done nothing but confirm there was a hole. They still would have had to cross their fingers on re-entry and hope it didn't kill them, which it ultimately would have. The astronauts were doomed just after lift-off.
The only possible way to save the crew (if they knew that there was a hole in the leading edge) would have been bringing Atlantis to the pad as soon as possible (she was still in the OPF, but AFAIK the boosters and tank were already mated together) while ignoring a bunch of safety checks. With saving energy, the crew of Columbia could have survived in orbit for at least 3-4 weeks as they had the long duration kit on board.
I didn't think of them sending up another shuttle. I guess I assumed they wouldn't have been able to last long enough for them to prepare another launch.
Au lieu de travailler, on peut aussi gagner de l´argent en jouant au poker. Inscrivez-vous sur CDPoker com avec le Numéro de coupon VICTORY et encaissez 600$ !
Five miles per second ... on the ground, that would be Mach 25.
Assuming the camera is generally looking "down" at the shuttle, the piece of the earth visible in the zoomed image is about 7,000 sq. miles in size -- ground points take 14 secs to travel from top to bottom of image ... at 5 mile/sec, that's a 70 miles, thus about 100 miles across the image.
And it STILL takes 90 minutes to get around the planet!
google human space flight, go to sighting opportunites, find your location and you'll actually see the space station fly by. Site also has all the tracking info, altitude, speed etc
no, not boosters. space shuttles, like basically every other satellite that goes into space, has special maneuvering charges, small controlled rockets that fire to put the shuttle into alignment.
Yes, they do a VERY slow roll over so the International Space Station can photograph the heat tiles to see if there's any damage from the launch. They're trying to avoid another Columbia disaster. And yes, as a result of the roll, the shuttle *does* fly backwards for awhile.
we should have ships that can go to marse and back from lanching horazontaly on Earth,refuling at the space station of corse. but we dont. we should have war ships in space but we dont. we should have an interplanatary gun system to protect us from friken astroids but we dont. we should have colonized marse, the moon, and many many astroyds in the belt but we havent now have we. o well good vid
lol it must be so funny for aliens to watch this laughing at us stuggling to do the smallest of maneuvers with 210 pounds of computer equipment that always shorts and causes major malfunctions. its like comparing a cheetah to a potato bug.
Neither. You young'uns seem to forget that the shuttle was orbiting in 1981; four years before Windows ('84) and ten years before Linux ('91).
The STS Orbiter uses a gang of computers capable of voting out malfunctioning computers. The code is in a high level custom language called HAL/S running on IBM AP-101 general-purpose avionic computers.
The STS Orbiter control software is arguably the most 'perfectly bug-free' block of code in existence.
Think I'll go watch Tony Hawk's first 900 again.
ArlieWinter 6 months ago
Who was the pilot for this mission? I must know. :D
TheeRealJRCroblox 6 months ago in playlist SEM CLASSIFICAÇÃO 12
I watched this while listening to Kindred Spirits - Liquid Tension Experiment.. so fuckin tear drop.
UnforgivingCritic 6 months ago
unfortunately its not the real image..:(
SpartanG61 1 year ago
damn.. and I was hoping for somekinda barrel-roll on a test flight in the atmosphere :D
e1gr 1 year ago
i like the part where its moving lol
darkear123 1 year ago
nice butt.
kargidesign 1 year ago 3
Space Parkour.....
MrManonthemoon69 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This is off-topic but it's space-related.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
Cosmored 2 years ago
That is a beautiful sight! It takes me about 5 hours to go 300 miles in a car, it takes them 18 seconds to travel between those points. Its not fair! lol
hunterhalo2 2 years ago
@hunterhalo2 and it takes you more than a whole tank ful of gas whereas the shuttle does that for free. (fuelwise). :)
AtlantisB737 1 year ago
i still think it is cool to have a beep between each conversation in the radio
baishihua 2 years ago 3
Haha, one backflip. "We started it over Africa, and by the time we finished we were over the coast of Italy"
joebloggs1123 2 years ago 2
yes well i meant to say 17,000 but hit the three by mistake.. but yea your right.... they do 37,000 when leaving orbit
skatering42 2 years ago
there going 37,000 m.p.h while doing this
skatering42 2 years ago
17,500 mph
blablubb12345 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America rocks even if we do have a socialist president....
chadreiser 2 years ago
i agree. that bastard
bloodanddirt 2 years ago
amazing :D:D gosh i wish i was onboard yay!
Jmsessn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shut the fuck up you dumb ass mother fucker. talk all big bad on youtube trying to start shit when i wasnt even talking to you. i bet you sit at your computer just looking through videos and reading the comments to see if you can start shtit out of nothing, cause it makes you feel all badass and tough. suck a dick bitch.
Pwaaaaah 2 years ago
i love reading the needless, uneducated banter that surfaces on here.
eric21muz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can't you see that it is a still photograph in the background?
robertgrassi 3 years ago
get a life mang
Jmsessn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the reality is that no one can explain how it would be possible to get in outer space; but almost everyone cannot dissagree with the propaganda that exagerates to the max the powers of the nations, disagree with the authority is a healthy reaction
robertgrassi 3 years ago
while all these space flights are truely impossible, the public doubts, doesn't dare to express it, and feel strange and weak in front of the authority
robertgrassi 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the problem is that you need all these explanations to explain simple things, these questions we ask those "scientists" because we don't understand are not answered, the explations are super refined excuses to explain what is impossible, those guys are payed to explain the power of the nations, to reinforce national unity and social peace, to let the public in wonder in front of what they don't understand,
robertgrassi 3 years ago
this is amazing!
dimzy3000 3 years ago
boooooooooooooring
guilhermebuck 3 years ago
i can see mine house ma !
kiwiterran1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nasa science is fake, it is based on german idealism principles, kant, einstein were selling you their religion, they were trying to explain a god with the means of philosophy and physics, their systems are artificial and against all reality, a physicist should explain reality and NOT unreality, it is not his job, how long will you believe that time goes at different speeds IN THE REAL WORLD
robertgrassi 3 years ago
hahhaha is this guy for real? try knowing what you are talking about b4 mouthing off u ignorant little man
playm8paul1987 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
these images are faked
there is no space stations, no probes, no space walks, no satellites
try to think by yourself and not by the biais of others
the space bullshit is only a matter of the greek gods
they have become much too much familiar
it's even a pain in the ass to contradict them
non the less the nasa logo is much more vulgar than my previous sentence
robertgrassi 3 years ago
do you smoke weed
I bet you think WTC is an inside job
bobdagangster 3 years ago
here in toronto ...right inside our very own subway stations there are large posters or bulletins which picture a New York police officer with a bell solo cellphone with the words '9-11 was an insider ' right on hid necktie!for cryin' out loud! (the add btw was for Bell solo...)
crawhip2 3 years ago
i don't make these things up...the add was posed up for about a month, then taken down and replaced by another add for some other vacation resort etc...this same add was also posted inside the train cars, but had nothing written on the NY city officers necktie, only the larger poster did ...
crawhip2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the usa always brags with freedom of speach
the officer, though, has only the choice to express his freedom with two different lies
"attacks" and "inside job"
as the reality is "propaganda drill"
robertgrassi 3 years ago
i smoke weed and i dont think the WTC is an inside job
Pwaaaaah 3 years ago
Then maybe you should stop smoking, you ignorant sheep.
kanalje 2 years ago
so...what are u suggesting?... that it's all a conspiracy to make us believe that 'man' himself is God since he can build or engineer all these wonderful things?
crawhip2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
in every country, the elite tries to pass as gods, in japan the emperor is even officially declared as a god, nasa is a religion, not science
robertgrassi 3 years ago
Incrível! Nós, pessoas comuns não podemos subir ao espaço, mas graças a vocês podemos imaginar como se estivessemos lá tambem. Obrigado.
Rubenssimoes 3 years ago
Yeah, Columbia blew up because there was a hole in the left wing because of foam from the external tank hitting it during lift off. Engineers saw it and requested the administration to do something like this, To check the shuttle. They said no because it would be to expensive, and cause further delays. 9000 degree plasma entered the hole during re-entry, causing the landing gear tires to explode and a chair reaction through the orbiter. 7 lives later, lesson finally learned.
Paragon0fVirtue 3 years ago 5
I understand what you're saying, but to be fair, they had no real way to fix the hole in the heat shield. Searching for a hole that *might* be there would have done nothing but confirm there was a hole. They still would have had to cross their fingers on re-entry and hope it didn't kill them, which it ultimately would have. The astronauts were doomed just after lift-off.
joeloud1 2 years ago
The only possible way to save the crew (if they knew that there was a hole in the leading edge) would have been bringing Atlantis to the pad as soon as possible (she was still in the OPF, but AFAIK the boosters and tank were already mated together) while ignoring a bunch of safety checks. With saving energy, the crew of Columbia could have survived in orbit for at least 3-4 weeks as they had the long duration kit on board.
blablubb12345 2 years ago
I didn't think of them sending up another shuttle. I guess I assumed they wouldn't have been able to last long enough for them to prepare another launch.
But as they say, hindsight is 20/20.
joeloud1 2 years ago
lol funny to see it's orbiting at 4 milllion miles... it'll be orbiting jupiter with style...
arroy624 3 years ago 3
Man, being in space looks really boring :P
But it does put things into perspective...
guguigugu 3 years ago
I dont know how many miles they orbited on this one, but another video said over 4 milllion miles.
bchiefs222 3 years ago
not a chance it four million miles
aburakkoi1 3 years ago
Think how big Earth is, and think how many 90 min orbits they would do in a week, and it does seem likely
pilot7893 3 years ago 2
i was talking about about how far up they were, but the distance they would go to orbit the earth is probaly around four million miles
aburakkoi1 3 years ago 2
it doesn't really look that far up
D3ADCR4P 3 years ago
dude each of those clouds is big as a city
iloveallecchianime 3 years ago
I think they are up 100 some miles above the earth. That's pretty far up :^)
VTXnME 3 years ago
why does it take so long?
small am't of fuel to burn therefore less thrust available i guess?
stevehawking 3 years ago
nah probably cause they wanna rotate it slowly so as to give the camera as much footage as possible
intrepidrock123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Au lieu de travailler, on peut aussi gagner de l´argent en jouant au poker. Inscrivez-vous sur CDPoker com avec le Numéro de coupon VICTORY et encaissez 600$ !
iiixxxxxxiii 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats soo cooool. my uncle did that backflip
aronmauck 4 years ago
Thats amazing! I get chills!
NiteOwl1224 4 years ago 2
How fast does the shuttle and space station travel while in orbit?
piratebri 4 years ago
Five miles per second ... on the ground, that would be Mach 25.
Assuming the camera is generally looking "down" at the shuttle, the piece of the earth visible in the zoomed image is about 7,000 sq. miles in size -- ground points take 14 secs to travel from top to bottom of image ... at 5 mile/sec, that's a 70 miles, thus about 100 miles across the image.
And it STILL takes 90 minutes to get around the planet!
lenarends 4 years ago 3
about 7200 m/s which is 16105 mph
NiXAeternus 4 years ago
google human space flight, go to sighting opportunites, find your location and you'll actually see the space station fly by. Site also has all the tracking info, altitude, speed etc
interstategar 4 years ago
17,500 MPH. Now that's what I call really moving! But it doesn't use it's engines. It just glides at that speed. Pretty incredible.
vodude 3 years ago
No friction, nothing to slow it down.
VTXnME 3 years ago
There is a bit friction. But still too less to show any big effects in such small time scales.
MrCalhoun 3 years ago
it's cause theres like one atom per cibic meter in spac so theres virtually no friction
aburakkoi1 3 years ago
Comment removed
zice39 2 years ago
hey thats the columbia if not email me back
lkj802 4 years ago
How does it do a back flip? Does it use boosters?
Fidokrab 4 years ago
no, not boosters. space shuttles, like basically every other satellite that goes into space, has special maneuvering charges, small controlled rockets that fire to put the shuttle into alignment.
XilStorm 4 years ago
they really cautios now after the columbia disaster..
Fulaeetoy 4 years ago
zeadman2 you need to learn how to spell before you start thinking of any space idea's lol ;D "marse"?
zykeaisem13 4 years ago
really cool vid
beelzbub 4 years ago
Remember 2001 A Space Odyssey ballet dance in space.
jerryaltman 4 years ago
i couldn't stop having the Blue Danube waltz in my head while watching this
intigfx 4 years ago 2
Crude animation. And comments are recorded in a studio. Just kidding.
teemuruskeepaa 4 years ago
terrible analogy..refuelling at the space station makes sense..only problem is that i dont think they can hold THAT much fuel
lucent5 4 years ago
dude, it's going backwards !?
CURLYWART 5 years ago
Yes, they do a VERY slow roll over so the International Space Station can photograph the heat tiles to see if there's any damage from the launch. They're trying to avoid another Columbia disaster. And yes, as a result of the roll, the shuttle *does* fly backwards for awhile.
LoneStarStateOfMine 4 years ago
we should have ships that can go to marse and back from lanching horazontaly on Earth,refuling at the space station of corse. but we dont. we should have war ships in space but we dont. we should have an interplanatary gun system to protect us from friken astroids but we dont. we should have colonized marse, the moon, and many many astroyds in the belt but we havent now have we. o well good vid
Zeadman2 5 years ago
You forgot to mention McDonalds and gas stations in outter space.....
DAVEtheMAGICIAN 4 years ago
lol it must be so funny for aliens to watch this laughing at us stuggling to do the smallest of maneuvers with 210 pounds of computer equipment that always shorts and causes major malfunctions. its like comparing a cheetah to a potato bug.
TheBlitz1 5 years ago
Do they run "Windows" on the shuttle? Or did they change to linux?
Damian007a1 5 years ago
Neither. You young'uns seem to forget that the shuttle was orbiting in 1981; four years before Windows ('84) and ten years before Linux ('91).
The STS Orbiter uses a gang of computers capable of voting out malfunctioning computers. The code is in a high level custom language called HAL/S running on IBM AP-101 general-purpose avionic computers.
The STS Orbiter control software is arguably the most 'perfectly bug-free' block of code in existence.
eccentricellipse 3 years ago 18
Yep, the final redundant computer has never been used.
MaxPrefect 3 years ago
@eccentricellipse
XD of course it is the most bug free software ever
what else would you build into a 1.7 billion dollar vehicle
predatortheme 1 year ago 3
@eccentricellipse thats what you get when you hire the smartest minds in the world to make it
SuperPHAG 1 year ago
...that looks like mars in the backgruond.
iTimmeh 5 years ago
well i guess we found water there
ieatbaconforlunch 5 years ago
We did, we found out water used to be there...
And im talking about early in the video anyway.
iTimmeh 5 years ago
fantastic. enough said.
samandjoesdad 5 years ago
a w e s o m e starts slow, so keep watching.
maryjanemccarthy 5 years ago