Added: 2 years ago
From: ForaTv
Views: 2,070
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • " Those willing to give up liberty for security deserve niether and will lose both " Benjamin Franklin...

  • Michael Hayden, RCC.

    Majority on the Supreme Court, 6-3 RCC.

    Majority religion across both supposed sides of the aisle in DC...the RCC.

    Majority on Presidential Cabinets since the late 5o's, the RCC.

    Part in parcel of the Requirimiento, in place from the inception of the uSa.

  • IMO, If you don't think warrantless surveillance violates the 4th Amendment, you don't deserve your citizenship.

  • EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES killed the 4th Amendment.

  • a) The governments IS the terrorists on this planet.

    b) Being secretly surveilled by a terrorist-organisation that is our government and therefor "legal" scares the living shit outta me.

    Hows that for a poll?

  • I'm not bothered. Yes, surveillance is unwarranted but we don't know about it.

    Are they monitoring our youtube comments, too? If someone coincidentally knocks on my door after I've posted hate speech against a government figure, then I'll be worried.

    Otherwise I feel this is a paranoid scare. This borderlines god-fearing.

    Perhaps they'll enjoy my collection of porn sites visited.

  • I would be curious to see the results of a poll like this:

    Which are you more afraid of?

    a) being personally killed by a terrorist.

    b) being secretly surveilled by the US government.

  • Language can always be twisted and manipulated, hence the reason why constitutional safeguards are nowhere near as effective as they were originally intended.

  • Wake up America

    Cheney was the 20th hijacker

    LAUGH as DEAD JFK

    examines the 9-11 SCAM

    watch?v=8DQp0QxkBCU

  • That's a sticky wicket in of itself, by which I mean the bit about the Supreme Court ruling that foreign intelligence is an exception to the 4th Amendment. I would have to read the ruling to understand better, but any time the Constitution is refined it can lead to a Pandora's Box. Who defines what foreign intelligence is, and can a government agency do so unmonitored?

  • Does a bear shit in the woods?

  • Awesome post

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more