I would be more impressed if u got the good version of this song... The Who are one if the most rocking bands ever and this is a terrible cover. Even tho Fred Durst is wiked.
well i think the song is an alright cover of the who but the the stup l i m p discover thing is so fucking stupid and the extra verse is bad but its alright but wesley32 did an absolutey terrible job-that yellow orange thing u do so much is not a chord retard
ps the pearl jam cover of this song is really good much better than this
ok few things. this song is stupid. the who did a WAYYYY better version, and u spelled bizkit wrong. u did good on the but, but damn why not the who version?
yes, I agree with everybody, this chart is bad, pls check it my chart :P
phonix132 1 year ago
wtf y is it limp bizkit? y not the who
12345678jkll 2 years ago
agreed
taylordstn 2 years ago
this is my favorite version of behind blue eyes
Troy1478 2 years ago
uuuh
emwjmannen2 2 years ago
This version of behind blue eyes is EPIC FAIL
kiltsonfire164 3 years ago
im really mad they didnt put the who version on
itchyballz21 3 years ago 2
they didnt put either version on..this is a custom song
BFMVluvr 3 years ago
really good song *does the lighter thing with crowd of friends*
audrey7kool 3 years ago
I would be more impressed if u got the good version of this song... The Who are one if the most rocking bands ever and this is a terrible cover. Even tho Fred Durst is wiked.
wallerg123 3 years ago 3
now i notice that the chart reaaaaally sucks. damn. nothings right
MuppenTTi 4 years ago 3
Horrible
DaFckedUpKid 4 years ago 3
worst note chart ever
lzsthjp 4 years ago 5
the who kicks lb's BALLS
stjimmy1428 4 years ago 3
well i think the song is an alright cover of the who but the the stup l i m p discover thing is so fucking stupid and the extra verse is bad but its alright but wesley32 did an absolutey terrible job-that yellow orange thing u do so much is not a chord retard
ps the pearl jam cover of this song is really good much better than this
lpzhuggybear 4 years ago 6
ok few things. this song is stupid. the who did a WAYYYY better version, and u spelled bizkit wrong. u did good on the but, but damn why not the who version?
apokolypz1 4 years ago 2
how did you get this song!?! i have GHII and I can't find this song!!!
mjamsteyer 4 years ago
Crappy song, bad chart, not even in sync, failure on all levels.
troodon9999 4 years ago
thanks limp bizkit, for killing a perfectly good who song
cammy4566 4 years ago 4
Yeah seriously
pinballwiz11 4 years ago
u guys suck this was a great song but they didnt get the song perfect though and thats the only thing that sucks but the rest was really good
jakes555568 4 years ago
Limp Bizkit sucks! and thats a fact!
GIMME THE OLDIES! The Who, Led Zeppelin, The Doors, Queen, Deep Purple etc.
MercilessGiraffe 4 years ago
i like the song, but the chart sucks balls!
ssick92 4 years ago
i beleive this is the limp bizkit cover which... for a crappy band they didnt do that bad of a cover in my eyes
Fowlwing 4 years ago
"Behind Blue Eyes" was made famous by The Who. this cover sucks and they butchered the best part of the song, the ending.
somisdrummer 4 years ago
Agreed. Limp Biskit should be punished
GnRlies1992 4 years ago
i love you i hate this version
strongmad86 4 years ago
Maybe Pete Townshend should smash his guitar on them...
pinballwiz11 4 years ago 4
and somisdrummer i love you as well i hate this version
strongmad86 4 years ago