If you are a jerk (racist) thinking you are better than a southeast asian or better than a northern asian...you just totally dragged all this high tech genetic studies back into the stone ages. You might as we'll be draging around a wooden club and walking on your knuckles vs carrying an Ipad with your armani suit. Grow up and be happy..not proud..that you have such a history to enjoy and research and share with your kids. You know your ancestors and not blind to your history/genetic. Cool it
You guys so freaken racist. Would it have been ironic if you were all conquered and enslave by some arian nation like hitler..then you will shut up about this personal..I am more white or more northern. Yes some nation has a higher population genetically associated with a haplotype compared to another nation. So what. What! Is its historical inheritance, culture, beauty, journey, challenges, food, clthing etc.. also pains and autrocity. Does your flesh and psyche care where you came from!
This must be an idiot that made this video. Do you know that korean Dna is only 40% unique korea and the rest came from southeast asia, China, Japan, and africans.
The Northern chinese are more altaic than the southern stock. THe southern stocks however are prettier . Maybe this is the modern population. They don't need plastic surgery like koerans and mongolians cuz they have super slanted slit eyes with no eyelid creases. So what is wrong with Australoid DNAs????
@DragonOfQin Modern Chinese do not look like Terracotta Army. Maybe Ancient Chinese did (China consisted of many states back then), however modern Han Chinese are mixed between these people and Southeast Asians (Austronesians).
@AltaicCivilization : Indonesia declares to stop talking with Korean, because there was a video made by Korea makes everyone Indonesia felt humiliated. people of Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese are the best for Indonesia.^.
@AltaicCivilization Wikipedia says that the original Chinese now AKA Northern Hans migrated down south and intermingled with the austronesians. Northern Chinese still look like the terracotta army. My dad resembles one. My mom is southern han.
@AltaicCivilization thanks for the reply. I wana know what institution published this study because I got mine DNA data published by Elsevier. Manchus and Koreans shared O2b dna and Han chinese were very close to Japanese people. Elsevier.com.
@DragonOfQin I'm European (Italian). This video is ridicolous, Chinese people have the HIGHEST IQ in the World lol, they're the MASTERS of Asia in every field, in any type of knowledge, in warrior power. Chinese are also the best looking people of Asia, alot better than barbarians from the north. Also them have their respectful History and Knowledge: but are nothing compared to Chinese.
pure Austronesian family have brown or tan skin and dark-brown eye. the universal Austronesian pronunciation for # 5 is lima or rima. as the issue above, austronesian people is seaferer that populate from madagascar southeast asia, southern china, new zealand to pasific island. it's also possible to happen when austronesian moving to north that they meet with north asian.
@DON270523 I'm European (Italian). This video is ridicolous, Chinese people have the HIGHEST IQ in the World lol, they're the MASTERS of Asia in every field, in any type of knowledge, in warrior power. Chinese are also the best looking people of Asia, alot better than barbarians from the north. Also them have their respectful History and Knowledge: but are nothing compared to Chinese.
Koreans are true Northeast asians... because they have no australoid mixtures. Then its Japanese with only 3% australoid mixtures. Then Han chinese are closest to australoids (approx 30% australoid mixtures).
We are all asian wtf are you all talking about. (i mean if your asian and posting comments arguing about this topic) who cares what studies show. we are all yellowed skinned we believe in the buddha. now also God and other religions. we eat rice. we all know how to fight. also we allhave straight hair. well most of us do
@yoesop Actually East Asians have whiter skins than Europeans. Europeans have brown skin too (Italians, Spanish, some Greeks) and many Northern Europeans can develop brown skin from sun exposure.
@genetruths well they can be dark skinned to. im just sayin thats what most asians look like. also i have really white skin. like white white white. and im mixed east asian and southeast
Austronesian languagesare a group but also in dealing with genetic. The latest research says only covers pribuni Austronesian Taiwan, the Philippines, Guam, Micronesia, Sulawesi, Maluku, and all countries in the Pacific Ocean.
@kartikasweet It might be a language group however it also exists as a genetic one. Although Han Chinese are linguistically Sino-Tibetan, they are in between Austronesians and Sino-Tibetans since Han Chinese have the most Austronesian DNA in East Asia.
and it is very surprising that mayorita Indonesian which include: Sumatra, Sunda, Java, Borneo, East Malaysia (Borneo), and Bali are not Austronesian. they are very different from the Austronesian mainly from Culture and genetic.
Japanese is very different from Indian .... from, skin, face, and eyes are very different from Indian, we only know Japanese is very similar to what Korean and Chinese and they have dna korea and china. Did you see the Ainu ... they are different from those Japanese who are now
everyone in the world knows that Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Mongolian is one race. only a fool would say that Korean is a different person chinese and japanese
02b only in korean and japanese and 0% not in other places, including southeast asia
Indonesia is the highest state in the southeast and east asia who have dna Eroupean (R1B1) the possibility of colonization,,,( Dutch,british and spanish ).
most of Indonesian, they do not have slanted eyes, they do not have blue eyes, but the majority of them have round eyes like those of Spanish.
Chinese, North Siberia, and Southeast Asians! They are the new Asians! Are genetically brothers! You with the Mongols and Australian blacks the same gene type! Is our new Asian ancestors conquered slaves!
@Kokunihon I regret to tell you! Genetic research shows that the Chinese people, in the north Mongoloid! Southeast Asians in the South Mongolian! It is recognized worldwide!
@ChineseHOME1 Actually Chinese came from Southeast Asia, not Northeast Asia.
Please read genetic studies again. Chinese is similar to Southeast Asian, not really Northeast Asian.
Why so many Chinese want to claim Japan is North Asia or Southeast Asia? Japanese is from South Asia (India) nothing to do with China or Southeast Asian. Ainu and Jomons are not Asian... we are relatives of Indian.
73% of Australian aborigine have ag (black) type and 27% have axg (green) type! This indicates that South Korea and Australians are brothers! afb1b3 (red) and fb1b3 (white) Europeans and Asians, GM blood!
Chinese always want be part of the northern Asian race but in reality they are southeast Asians who only migrated up north. Yet they look down on southeast Asians. Strange.
This entire video is sooo gay especially the part with 2:18 - 2:24 . Chinese cannot claim Yuan and Qing, the same goes for Koreans for flipping sake. Why are chinese and koreans so stupid?
AltaicCivilization obviously is korean, I dislike chinese, but this is so stupid. The genetic map at 0:33 - 0:35 completely denies your altaic roots, how can you claim chinese as austronesian and Koreans as altaic, when there is way more sino-tibetan genes in korean, than austronesian gene in chinese?
@john3252osk Japanese are NOT from China you fucking idiot. How do Japanese even look like Chinese? Japanese are from South Asia (India, Himalayan, Tibet) not China.
That's so fucking stupid lie. You're obviously made all that shit up. All the indonesian studies I've seen shows indonesian with O2a, O1a, O3, with only 5.7% of R1a.
@rudrakxa : I strongly agree with you .. we are not mongoloid because Indonesian has a normal eye,, Indonesian now has a mix of European is very high and some Persian mix. and several other Asian countries including the Spanish and American. ( 40% Indonesia had a mixture of other countries )
''
sudah capek saya melihat orang indonesia selalu di hina sama mereka padahal kita tidak pernah berbuat salah sama mereka"
@kartikasweet 83% of your population are mongoloid, 17% show an mixture of mongoloid and non-mongoloid. Adding to the fact some indonesians have kept their archaic proto-mongoloid appearance, like many Native americans and taiwan aborigines have kept. The original and oldest mongoloid look more indonesians or southeast asian mongoloid. Unlike the Chinese, Japanese, Mongolian, Korean ect is result of the ice age, which gave them light skin, and shrinking their eyes and face.
@rudrakxa That's so fucking stupid lie. You're obviously made all that shit up. All the indonesian studies I've seen shows indonesian with O2a, O1a, O3, with only 5.7% of R1a.
Japanese are not korean... we japanese are from jomon (縄文) from okinawa and ryukyu. Japanese, andaman islanders and tibetans have 50% to 80% haplogroup D and only the three kept the D. So japanese, tibetan and andaman islanders are related.
So are Japanese, you dumbass monkey. The Japs are nothing like the Jomons. The Jomons are long gone people, prehistoric era, dumbfuck. As for Ainus, you can tell a fucken difference between a Jap and an Ainu. ^^
@ghoststrider45 I already showed you the evidence. Japanese D is found in Tibet, Thailand and Andaman Islands at 50%+. We Japanese didnt come from Korea or China. We Japanese are from South Asia. The O2b came from Tungus not Koreans.
Actually they are more like 3/4 product of ainu + Koreans and 1/4 product of ainu + Chinese. If you look at the map, the Japanese are genetically closer to Korean, but they are closer to chinese than koreans are closer to chinese. Manchus are closer to Koreans, but they are also closer to mongolians than koreans are closer to mongolians. North chinese is close to tibetan, Himalayan, Bhutanese.
Average Japanese = 50% Korean + 35% Chinese + 15% Ainu
What you think matters not to me. There is no pure Japanese, they are all an mixture. Japanese are closer to Koreans but they are not koreans because they have much higher diversity.
3/4 of Koreans + Ainu AND 1/4 Chinese + Ainu = Modern Japanese. The graph shows western Japanese are slightly closer to chinese. While the rest of Japan is slightly closer to Koreans. Japanese from Okinawa and Hokkaido are the closest to ainu
YOU WANT PROOF??? the japanese are the one's who made an TV program about genetic sequence of Japanese. (The video is still on youtube btw). And it was the Japanese scientists claiming that there genetics have more in common with both the Koreans and Chinese. What more proof do you want? you can even read the genetic study japanese people.
Y-dna O2b 32% in Japan, Sino-tibetan O3a5 18% in japan (in western Japan 23%) , 40% ainu D2
Indonesia is a big country and so many races and tribes in there ... Many people in Indonesia who have yellow skin,,, If thou to the island of Sumatra, Sunda, Nias, Borneo, West Java, North Sulawesi. You will see a very oriental, ... and most of Eastern Indonesia with a total of 10% of the population of Indonesia, they are people of black skin and very beautiful .. do not forget many people in Indonesia who have a mixture eroupean (= Indo ),
Although both kazakhs and kyrgyz are mix of mongoloid and caucasoid. They are genetically similar to mongolians,siberians,tungustics. This is because they have portion of their asian blood is higher. Some mongolians also have caucasian dna. Which yet again links them more closer.
Koreans and Japanese basically have nothing to do with central asians.
Hey guys I uploaded a new video that shows more recent genetic studies. It shows a genetic map of East Asia (2010 source). Genetics of Koreans, Japanese and Han Chinese (admixture studies) are also covered in great detail.
@AltaicCivilization Actually Tibetan and Chinese are both the same race. They belonged to the Sino-Tibetan race grouping. Yet you listed Tibetan as a separate race from the Chinese. Unless you have a solid evidence or source, this cannot be claimed as a fact.
@Anthony546580451 Actually europeans are more related to africans (true fact). That is because europeans received more genetic flow from north africa into spain, italia, greece. Then later spread to other parts of europe. Also middle-easterns are more related to africans than europeans. Middle-eastern people are basically more related to north africans than they are to europeans.
@eurofootball42 Southern Europeans have lot of african genes but european is just a huge term it doesn't refer to any exact ethnic race,so it is meaningless to argue whether europeans have how much african genes because they are SIMPLY just a bunch of totally different ethnic groups!
The video editor is so stupid and fake Lol thank you for proving koreans are not an altaic people, you have at least 50% of blue, you have more non-altaic genes than south chinese have austronesian which means korean people not Northeast asian. Lol I need to everyone about this video.The most funny question is he asked if han chinese are part of sino-tibetan so why are han chinese SOO DIFFERENT??? dumbass because north chinese is different south chinese. Ainu don't even look mongoloid
east and southeast Asian Mongoloid descent but there are some differences in skin color. east asia people have white skin and slanted eyes, while Southeast Asia has dark skin because of environmental and weather. if you've been to Indonesia many tribes - tribes that live in the mountains they have skin and eyes are not much different from those east asia are many theories that say they are the original mongoloid who came from mainland Asia that make up the Indonesian people today.
@kartikasweet Genetically they are very different to Northeast Asians. Indonesians are mostly Austronesians. Check the 2009 study: "Mapping Human Genetic Diversity in Asia". It clearly shows Indonesians have majority Austronesian DNA in their genes.
@AltaicCivilization :whether Austronesian very bad? what is wrong with Austronesian so you hate to Austronesian? Do you feel Korean is the most perfect person in this world? Austronesian are grup languagesis not a genetic , you are trying to learn more. Is genetic Indonesia are very close to the Taiwan Aboriginal / Polynesian or thai: Answers Indonesia are very close to thai. not whether we always insult others, thanks
@kartikasweet When did I say Austronesians are "very bad"? Han Chinese, Indonesians, and other Southeast Asians are all genetically Austronesian. Austronesian is a linguistic term, however it can be a genetic term too if similarities among ethnic groups of a particular ethno-linguistic group can be established.
Indonesians are very close to other Southeast Asians.
@AltaicCivilization indonesians, fillipinos, micronesians, macronesians, negritos,malaysians are all one big genetic family:) the thai-lao are not related to none of them!
@shitnamese401 Yes that's correct. However Thai, Lao and Vietnamese are related to eachother. Indonesians, Filipinos, Micronesians, etc are admixed with Australoids which means they are a bit different from mainland Southeast Asians. However they are quite close to Thai, Lao and Vietnamese, just not as close to them as they are to eachother.
@AltaicCivilization yes you are right! you can't compare mainland south east Asian countries to archipelago south East asian countries because mainland south east asian looks mores East Asian!
Malay and indonesians are 55-60 austro-asiatic (look at video). West indonesians have some indian dna, but 15% filipino and many east indonesian have austroloid dna.
Genetic cluster: (New study 2011)
Group 1: Mongolians, buryats, Kazakhs, evenki, kyrgyz,
Group 2: Manchus, Koreans, Japanese
Group 3: North chinese, tibetan, himalayans, Bhutanese
Group 4: Hakka, Cantonese, Minnan (south chinese)
Group 5: Vietnamese,cambodians, thai, indonesians, malay
Chinese are from Melanesians,,, Melanesians and chinese are from the same genetic family that is different from japanese, koreans and mongolians. Have a look at my new video
@MelanesianChinese Your videos is ridiculous,this shows the world how stupid,ignorant and racist the koreans are.Now I know why Japanese and Chinese look down on koreans.Koreans are just totally comedic.
@eurofootball42 : yeah true..Korean pure northem mongoloids . The O2b sub-group is of high frequency in all Korean populations.but why japanese propoganda they have most of O2b ?
@eurofootball42 The Ainu are not Australoid, but they may be related to Australoids. All genetic studies point to a theory that the Ainu are the most related to the Northeast Asians, but not really to the Australoids. The Han Chinese, Indonesians and Malays all have some significant Australoid admixture in their genomes. It's very evident and well established from the most recent genome-wide studies.
@AltaicCivilization Anthropology data show that indigenous australian& ainu are from same australoid family. It's true that ainu's are mixed with yayoi japanese but before 20th century, ainu was mainly australoid& sakhalin fusion (pale australoid).
@kartikasweet O1 is linked with Austronesian,O2 is linked with Daics.Haplogroup R is an Eurasian haplogroup which is more likely from India as you know SoutheastAsia was heavily influenced by emigrants from India and some other Southern Asian countries.
@16ritzy 21.5% of northern chinese have O1 and 15% of southern chinese have O1. How do you explain why northern chinese have even greater frequency of O1a y-dna hg? don't forget that some buryat groups (west-central siberia) have 50% O1a.
Southeast asians have australoid origins (proto-dravidians). Pure australoids are australian aboriginies, melanesians and micronesians. Mixed australoids are mainly cambodian, vietnamese, filipinos and thai. Japanese are part australoid too (via jomon).
@eurofootball42 Northern chinese don't have such high percentage of O1,more likely 1% to 5%.Southeast Asians are mongoloid too,but the melanesians and australoids are not.Yeah they used to live in Southeast Asia before the arrival of Mongoloids like austronesians and daic.
@eurofootball42 A large part of Southeast Asians have mixed with australoid but this doesn't mean they came from australoid,melanesian,micronesians or whatever,they were mongoloids originating from southern part of china before arriving in southeast asia and mixed with the australoid natives there who had a much smaller population.
@16ritzy A lot of southeast asians have australoid admixture. There are many chinese with australoid admixture too. Dont forget the aboriginal jomon japanese have significant australoid admixture (they could be considered as northern australoid group). There are archeological studies linking jomon japanese to australian aboriginies and pacific islanders.
@eurofootball42 australoids used to live in east asia as well,there were australoid skeletons found in southern china,it shows that even before the austronesians and daics were originated from southern china,the australoids were already living in eastasia
I don't know if it's true but I get a feeling that a lot of Koreans on the net have an agenda is to prove Chinese austronesian, and Korean+ japanese are the only east asians. There is no such thing as north east Asians. Everyone in the eastern part of Asia is east Asians includes all south east Asians. The austronesians are just the mixture of south east Asia islanders like Indonesians and philipinos with people of the inner part of asia
Taiwanese have 88% austronesian mtdna but it's diluted. Nothing to do with conquer with being conquered by chinese males , they just intermarried married them.
Prof Edisson Liu of Hugo Mapping say :SEA peoples,Japanese, Tibet, mongolian,nort, central asia were originally NOT MONGOLOIDS but that mongoloids mixed with them. only korean and chinese=mongoloid original IT'S WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION.not true mongoloid original came from north or central asia but its true mongoloid original came from north/south korea and china.
@toki1221 It's disgusting, can you explain to me why Japanese have such high frequencies of D2 ? yet 99.9% of japanese look no different to pure asians. Why the heck do you have like 45% D2 yet there is almost no japanese that look jomon with the acception of you or ken hirai
@AltaicCivilization What does kingdoms have to do with genetics? anyway someone must have edited the table since it defies y-dna and mtdna data.Your 15-40% data is wrong,did you calculate these green bar charts in PERCENTAGE? I did,it shows north chinese have only about 5-7% austronesian,hakka 30%, cantonese 34%.Japanese 1.45%.Should turkmen,uzbeks,uyghurs be considered mongoloid even though they have 60% caucasoid dna and look more like caucasoid? Heck, even turkey have 7% mongoloid dna.
Try to know the history of Han Chinese before making such comment !
Han Chinese is a complex of ethic groups. They met and mixed at BC times.
Hakka, in a very strict sense, represent the first ethic group who was introgressed by peoples from outside of (traditional sense) China. So in this aspect, Hakka should be the most pure Han Chinese. They traveled from Northern and Central China to South China ever since 2000 years ago.
@elzedleeu Your Hakka Chinese has the most Austronesian DNA after Cantonese. In fact even Beijing (North China) have 15% Austronesian genes.
History does not tell anything about genetics. Historical documents do not correlate well with genetic data. Historical writing is not an objective way of looking at things. The most recent genetic studies show that Han Chinese do indeed have multiple origins.
@AltaicCivilization , In Chinese, Hakka means 'guest'. Hakka knows that they came from relatively Northern China (In fact, this is a trend of China history -- Han Chinese moved from north to South to escape from Nomadic Peoples's invasion).
So they treat themselves as guests (of south China). Their language is very similar to ancient Chinese (language, i mean.). And in fact, their language was used as national language in the past for quite a long time.
@AltaicCivilization And about history, personally, i think the history of China for the most recent 1 and a half century, has been distorted by the Communist Party. But the population history was recorded long long ago, and can be re-confirmed with certain ethic groups tradition and culture.
@AltaicCivilization Last but not least, I do not think it is proper to use biological history/ population demography to confirm or over-thrown historical facts. Culture is stronger and serves as a better criterial to really reflect history.
Human is not inbreeders. When Hakka moved to south China and science they have been there for such a long time (>1.5k years), it is not surprising to see nowdays they share genomic elements with South Asian people.
So the paper is not able to prove a distorted China History!
At most you can only say' Biologically, Han Chinese has a very complex history!".
To mistaken population history for Cultural history is incorrect ! To politicized the issue is even worse !!
@AltaicCivilization I dont think that chinese are full austronesian... they are part austronesian mixed.
Austronesian y-dna hg marker is O1, and han chinese males are 15% O1, so austronesian people from south came and conquered chinese woman at 15% rate. Chinese O3 rate is about 30-70%. Tibetan O3 rate is about 50-80% too. Korean O3 rate is about 30-50%.
What your history is about chinese... chinese is influenced by a lot of cultures, not just southeast asia, but also korea, japan, mongol
@eurofootball42 Are you fucking monkey stupid? there was never such historical fact.More like the other way around. There is 35% austronesian mtdna and 15% O1 in south chinese but it's diluted.
Cantonese have 7.8% O1
Hakka have 20%
20 million Taiwanese people = Southern chinese men + taiwanese aborigines.
(Read wikipedia taiwanese which is genetically proven)
@abeeaveb2 : Nice Your Posting .. yeach genetic majority Indonesians more related to thai and viet than to grup austronesian peoples aborigine taiwan , hawai and filipina...but don't forget malaysians have mixed dravida gene.
@AltaicCivilization : majority of people in indonesia are of daic descent , only Aborigin taiwan, filipina, polynesian,canton has any significant austronesian descent. You know all Indonesians never hate Korean.
but please don't brings Indonesia name with your rubbish postings. Thank you case closed !
@abeeaveb2 That's why Chinese can't claim Northeast Asian kingdoms like Korean (Koguryo, Baekje, Shinra) and Jurchen (Jin, Qing) as theirs. Chinese have more Austronesian genes than Koreans and other Northeast Asians.
@kartikasweet Your data is an HUGE MISTAKE and A HELL OF AN STRETCH, particularly your O1 and O2b
O1 - 90% taiwan aborigines, 46% filipino, 30% malay,indonesian. South chinese 15%, vietnam 10% ,thailand only 6% ( seriously only 6% and you include thais?)
O2b koreans,japanese it is ALMOST non-existant in north chinese,tibet,siberian
Northern asian and northeast asian looks like alien and very ugly !!!!… Southern Chinese and austronesian people are more beautiful with bigger eyes etc,,
@shoexy Southern chinese are not that related with austronesian. Their still more related with to north han chinese. North chinese are less than and south chinese has 2/3 or 66% similarity to han chinese.If you calculate the bar chart Austronesian dna North han chinese 7% Hokkien 28% Hakka 30% Cantonese 34% Non-chinese Zhuang 45% Filipino 94% Amis 96%.
@neo91787 I think you should look into the real history distortion... Naoki Kouziro, Shinichi Fujimura ring any bells?
The forgery scandal was a systematic problem of Japanese academia of archaeology and the Ministry of Education. Conscientious Japanese scholars admit their forged history is dated back to the 8 Century Japan. Professor Naoki Kouziro of Osaka City University(大阪市立大学) confessed that part of Nihon Shoki (日本書紀, にほんしょき, 720 A.D.) was forged to elongate the early history of Japan.
The Cavalli-Sforza book does not place each and every Han Chinese under the Austronesian classification. At the most broad level, Chinese are broken down to 'Northern' and 'Southern' groups. The 'Northern Chinese' subgroup converges with that of other 'northern' subgroups like the Tibetans, Tungus, Korean, and Japanese. It is the 'Southern Chinese' group that converges with those belonging to Austronesian group.
@Waterflux THAT still doesn't make sense.The graph shows south chinese are at least 66% closer to han chinese unlike filipino have 94% austronesian( green). While south chinese have over 60% tai (blue) including 5-10% (yellow) This means south chinese are at 2/3 closer to han chinese.If you look calculate bar chart in percentage. southern chinese have at least 58-60% blue and 28-34% green with 4.5 to 11% yellow.Filipino and amis 94% green, 3% blue and 1% yellow.
WTF? Why do you people come to Korea to do plastic surgery? Jealously? Inferior complexity? Koreans are one of the tallest, handsome, etc. race in Asia. hahahha XD
@kyoani32 well most people in real life dont even know what altaic is. either way everyone has different ideals of beauty. my perception would be buryats/yakuts/ or northern people from siberia. other people might not think so
Japanese ainu were hunter-gatherer. the difference = farming style. Ainu had no farming technology, but Manchuria and Korea had farmers due to good climate. japanese also had good climate but no technology. so korean developed better iron-age weapons to defeat japan kyushu and honshu island, spreading O2b1a-gene to japanese ainus. also japanese woman has 30% mtdna D which is siberian&manchurian origin. but japanese woman also have 30% mtdna M, N9a and Y(ainu gene).
@eurofootball42 Well when the westerners first came, they even claim they were caucasian, some claim aryan other claim middle eastern because of their hairy bodies,long beards,and caucasian like features.Pure ainu are actually lighter than japanese,darker ainu skin is from labouring in the sea in briny winds all the day, ainu have keep indoors is found to be as white as any western men.
Btw where is your proof japanese has 30% ainu mtdna? M7a 12-15%, N9a 3% , Y 0.6% an maximum of 18% at max.
@owardis397 jomon have 0% caucasian dna. they don't look caucasion, they represent australoid like you have stated here. ainu can come in different colors, just like japanese can be tanned or pale. from pictures, ainu look darker than average japanese.
Ainu were mistake for caucasian in pass by many western visitors and anthropologist who visited the ainu. South americans indians are very dark too,it has to do with climate and exposure to sun all day. Fishermen tend to have darker skin than average person and ainu economy depended on the fishing industry.I've seen many white skinned ainu too,but pure ainu are lighter skinned than japanese, the dark ones you see are from labouring the sea all days,otherwise they would never have been so dark.
Japanese D2 is only Y-dna. SNP-study on autosomes does not look at Y-dna, it looks at all genes that make up tissues, facial structure, bone structure, etc, etc. that is too many for human to count (billions of sequences). therefore japanese D2 is just male marker from negrito/southeast asian people, but japanese was mixed too much with north asians, so they have more autosomal SNP-gene related to korean&mongolian.
@eurofootball42 The only altaic in japan from korean.Haplogroup D2 is as different from other D. As mongolian C3 is as different from other C haplogroup.Ainu physical traits and appearance have nothing to do with southeast asian on negrito, I'll admit they even look very caucasian,very hairy,long beards but smaller in stature and genetically australoid.
@owardis397 I agree japanese ainu looks like australoid but genetic evidence refuted this in the past. I don';t think they look caucasoid/aryan. Japanese is 40% D2. rest is majority O2b1a&O3a3c, about 50-60%. korean O2b* is more common in manchuria searched by wiki. O2b1a is descendant people from korean to japanese kyushu and honshu island. So no-one is majority of another. Japanese woman also have higher mtdna hg N9a, M7a and Y (typical Ainu mtdna marker) ~ 30%.
So what makes japanese northeast asian with their high D2? ainu don't look like asians.The only south chinese with high austronesian admixture is taiwanese.North chinese cluster with tibetan and south chinese generally just have 15% of haplogroup O1, in contrast to taiwanese aborigines 90%, filipino 46%.
ching chang chong free tibet
aeneaspro 5 days ago
If you are a jerk (racist) thinking you are better than a southeast asian or better than a northern asian...you just totally dragged all this high tech genetic studies back into the stone ages. You might as we'll be draging around a wooden club and walking on your knuckles vs carrying an Ipad with your armani suit. Grow up and be happy..not proud..that you have such a history to enjoy and research and share with your kids. You know your ancestors and not blind to your history/genetic. Cool it
ranadraytonii 1 week ago
You guys so freaken racist. Would it have been ironic if you were all conquered and enslave by some arian nation like hitler..then you will shut up about this personal..I am more white or more northern. Yes some nation has a higher population genetically associated with a haplotype compared to another nation. So what. What! Is its historical inheritance, culture, beauty, journey, challenges, food, clthing etc.. also pains and autrocity. Does your flesh and psyche care where you came from!
ranadraytonii 1 week ago
This must be an idiot that made this video. Do you know that korean Dna is only 40% unique korea and the rest came from southeast asia, China, Japan, and africans.
The Northern chinese are more altaic than the southern stock. THe southern stocks however are prettier . Maybe this is the modern population. They don't need plastic surgery like koerans and mongolians cuz they have super slanted slit eyes with no eyelid creases. So what is wrong with Australoid DNAs????
ProudVietShitGook 2 weeks ago
AND SERIOUSLY, WHY IS THIS ONE OF MY RECOMMENDED VIDEOS?!
toransu 1 month ago
WHO THE SHIT CARES
toransu 1 month ago
Does the Terracotta army look South East Asian to you? Fucking retards.
DragonOfQin 1 month ago
@DragonOfQin Modern Chinese do not look like Terracotta Army. Maybe Ancient Chinese did (China consisted of many states back then), however modern Han Chinese are mixed between these people and Southeast Asians (Austronesians).
AltaicCivilization 2 weeks ago 2
@AltaicCivilization : Indonesia declares to stop talking with Korean, because there was a video made by Korea makes everyone Indonesia felt humiliated. people of Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese are the best for Indonesia.^.
kartikasweet 2 weeks ago
@AltaicCivilization Wikipedia says that the original Chinese now AKA Northern Hans migrated down south and intermingled with the austronesians. Northern Chinese still look like the terracotta army. My dad resembles one. My mom is southern han.
DragonOfQin 2 weeks ago
@AltaicCivilization thanks for the reply. I wana know what institution published this study because I got mine DNA data published by Elsevier. Manchus and Koreans shared O2b dna and Han chinese were very close to Japanese people. Elsevier.com.
DragonOfQin 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
KoreaforonlyKorean 5 days ago
@DragonOfQin I'm European (Italian). This video is ridicolous, Chinese people have the HIGHEST IQ in the World lol, they're the MASTERS of Asia in every field, in any type of knowledge, in warrior power. Chinese are also the best looking people of Asia, alot better than barbarians from the north. Also them have their respectful History and Knowledge: but are nothing compared to Chinese.
WORLD IQ CHART:
HONG KONG 108 (Southern China)
SINGAPORE 108
CHINA 105
/average-IQ-by-country.html
patres818 1 week ago
pure Austronesian family have brown or tan skin and dark-brown eye. the universal Austronesian pronunciation for # 5 is lima or rima. as the issue above, austronesian people is seaferer that populate from madagascar southeast asia, southern china, new zealand to pasific island. it's also possible to happen when austronesian moving to north that they meet with north asian.
DON270523 1 month ago
@DON270523 Actually Austronesians only migrated as far as Japan, however not to Korea. So Japan was the northern limit of Austronesian expansion.
AltaicCivilization 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DON270523 I'm European (Italian). This video is ridicolous, Chinese people have the HIGHEST IQ in the World lol, they're the MASTERS of Asia in every field, in any type of knowledge, in warrior power. Chinese are also the best looking people of Asia, alot better than barbarians from the north. Also them have their respectful History and Knowledge: but are nothing compared to Chinese.
WORLD IQ CHART:
HONG KONG 108 (Southern China)
SINGAPORE 108
CHINA 105
/average-IQ-by-country.html
patres818 1 week ago
Koreans are true Northeast asians... because they have no australoid mixtures. Then its Japanese with only 3% australoid mixtures. Then Han chinese are closest to australoids (approx 30% australoid mixtures).
eurofootball42 1 month ago
We are all asian wtf are you all talking about. (i mean if your asian and posting comments arguing about this topic) who cares what studies show. we are all yellowed skinned we believe in the buddha. now also God and other religions. we eat rice. we all know how to fight. also we allhave straight hair. well most of us do
yoesop 2 months ago
@yoesop Actually East Asians have whiter skins than Europeans. Europeans have brown skin too (Italians, Spanish, some Greeks) and many Northern Europeans can develop brown skin from sun exposure.
Northeast Asians have whitest skin of all races.
genetruths 2 months ago
@genetruths well they can be dark skinned to. im just sayin thats what most asians look like. also i have really white skin. like white white white. and im mixed east asian and southeast
yoesop 2 months ago
Austronesia : Taiwan aborigin,filipina, guam, micronesia,all pacifik ocean, hawai.
kartikasweet 2 months ago
Austronesian languagesare a group but also in dealing with genetic. The latest research says only covers pribuni Austronesian Taiwan, the Philippines, Guam, Micronesia, Sulawesi, Maluku, and all countries in the Pacific Ocean.
kartikasweet 2 months ago
@kartikasweet It might be a language group however it also exists as a genetic one. Although Han Chinese are linguistically Sino-Tibetan, they are in between Austronesians and Sino-Tibetans since Han Chinese have the most Austronesian DNA in East Asia.
AltaicCivilization 2 weeks ago
and it is very surprising that mayorita Indonesian which include: Sumatra, Sunda, Java, Borneo, East Malaysia (Borneo), and Bali are not Austronesian. they are very different from the Austronesian mainly from Culture and genetic.
kartikasweet 2 months ago
Japanese is very different from Indian .... from, skin, face, and eyes are very different from Indian, we only know Japanese is very similar to what Korean and Chinese and they have dna korea and china. Did you see the Ainu ... they are different from those Japanese who are now
kartikasweet 2 months ago
Indonesian race is Austronesian. Japanese race is Indian. Do not get confused with the genetic data.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
Indonesia is not the Austronesian group. Austronesian language just a little in the Indonesian language ( Search Indonesian language )
kartikasweet 3 months ago
everyone in the world knows that Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Mongolian is one race. only a fool would say that Korean is a different person chinese and japanese
02b only in korean and japanese and 0% not in other places, including southeast asia
kartikasweet 3 months ago
Indonesia is the highest state in the southeast and east asia who have dna Eroupean (R1B1) the possibility of colonization,,,( Dutch,british and spanish ).
most of Indonesian, they do not have slanted eyes, they do not have blue eyes, but the majority of them have round eyes like those of Spanish.
kartikasweet 3 months ago
Most Japanese are derived from the DNA of Southeast Asia and southern China.
john3252osk 3 months ago
Japanese came from India not Korea. Please do not deny that fact.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
Chinese, North Siberia, and Southeast Asians! They are the new Asians! Are genetically brothers! You with the Mongols and Australian blacks the same gene type! Is our new Asian ancestors conquered slaves!
ChineseHOME1 3 months ago
@ChineseHOME1 Chinese are Southeast Asian, not North Siberian. Well said in most genetics studies.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
@Kokunihon I regret to tell you! Genetic research shows that the Chinese people, in the north Mongoloid! Southeast Asians in the South Mongolian! It is recognized worldwide!
ChineseHOME1 3 months ago
@ChineseHOME1 Actually Chinese came from Southeast Asia, not Northeast Asia.
Please read genetic studies again. Chinese is similar to Southeast Asian, not really Northeast Asian.
Why so many Chinese want to claim Japan is North Asia or Southeast Asia? Japanese is from South Asia (India) nothing to do with China or Southeast Asian. Ainu and Jomons are not Asian... we are relatives of Indian.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
73% of Australian aborigine have ag (black) type and 27% have axg (green) type! This indicates that South Korea and Australians are brothers! afb1b3 (red) and fb1b3 (white) Europeans and Asians, GM blood!
ChineseHOME1 3 months ago
Chinese always want be part of the northern Asian race but in reality they are southeast Asians who only migrated up north. Yet they look down on southeast Asians. Strange.
Nice informative video.
stirrednotshaken7 3 months ago
This entire video is sooo gay especially the part with 2:18 - 2:24 . Chinese cannot claim Yuan and Qing, the same goes for Koreans for flipping sake. Why are chinese and koreans so stupid?
AltaicCivilization obviously is korean, I dislike chinese, but this is so stupid. The genetic map at 0:33 - 0:35 completely denies your altaic roots, how can you claim chinese as austronesian and Koreans as altaic, when there is way more sino-tibetan genes in korean, than austronesian gene in chinese?
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane
Koreans Balhae, Goguryeo, Jin all same. Koreans never wanted to be altaic, we don't like mongols as well, so stfu.
ghoststrider45 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Genetic cluster: (study 2011)
Group 1: Mongolians, buryats, Kazakhs, evenki, kyrgyz,
Group 2: Manchus, Koreans, Japanese
Group 3: North chinese, tibetan, himalayans, Bhutanese
Group 4: Hakka, Cantonese, Minnan (south chinese)
Group 5: Vietnamese,cambodians, thai, indonesians, malay
Group 6: Filipino, Taiwan aborigines.
Japanese = 50% korean + 35% chinese + 15% ainu
Manchus = 55 % korean + 35% mongolian + 10% chinese
Koreans = 80% korean + 15% mongolian + 5% chinese
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
Comment removed
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@Kokunihon I meant to say from southeast China.四川 雲南 昆明 & 越南 Vietnam Burma etc.
john3252osk 3 months ago
Most people of Japanese came from Southern China and Southeast Asia.
Became clear by the recent findings of the Y-DNA.
We Japanese people and culture you are connected to the monsoon.
john3252osk 3 months ago
@john3252osk Japanese are NOT from China you fucking idiot. How do Japanese even look like Chinese? Japanese are from South Asia (India, Himalayan, Tibet) not China.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
Comment removed
john3252osk 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry guys we are not fucking mongoloid race !
Majority Indonesians have R1B1 and J haplogroup !
rudrakxa 3 months ago
Sorry guys we are not fucking mongoloid race !
Majority Indonesia have R1B1 and J haplogropus !
rudrakxa 3 months ago
@rudrakxa
That's so fucking stupid lie. You're obviously made all that shit up. All the indonesian studies I've seen shows indonesian with O2a, O1a, O3, with only 5.7% of R1a.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@rudrakxa : I strongly agree with you .. we are not mongoloid because Indonesian has a normal eye,, Indonesian now has a mix of European is very high and some Persian mix. and several other Asian countries including the Spanish and American. ( 40% Indonesia had a mixture of other countries )
''
sudah capek saya melihat orang indonesia selalu di hina sama mereka padahal kita tidak pernah berbuat salah sama mereka"
kartikasweet 3 months ago
@kartikasweet 83% of your population are mongoloid, 17% show an mixture of mongoloid and non-mongoloid. Adding to the fact some indonesians have kept their archaic proto-mongoloid appearance, like many Native americans and taiwan aborigines have kept. The original and oldest mongoloid look more indonesians or southeast asian mongoloid. Unlike the Chinese, Japanese, Mongolian, Korean ect is result of the ice age, which gave them light skin, and shrinking their eyes and face.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rudrakxa That's so fucking stupid lie. You're obviously made all that shit up. All the indonesian studies I've seen shows indonesian with O2a, O1a, O3, with only 5.7% of R1a.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
Comment removed
john3252osk 4 months ago
Japanese are not korean... we japanese are from jomon (縄文) from okinawa and ryukyu. Japanese, andaman islanders and tibetans have 50% to 80% haplogroup D and only the three kept the D. So japanese, tibetan and andaman islanders are related.
Kokunihon 4 months ago
@Kokunihon
Japs = Korean products + ainu.
ghoststrider45 4 months ago
@ghoststrider45 I said Japanese are 縄文 which means Jomons. Jomons are from India, not Asia. Koreans are slant eyed fuckers
Frequency of HAPLOGROUP D
Japan: 50%
Andaman Islands: 100%
Tibet: 50%
Thai: 10%
Tibeto-Burman: 50%
Kokunihon 4 months ago
@Kokunihon
So are Japanese, you dumbass monkey. The Japs are nothing like the Jomons. The Jomons are long gone people, prehistoric era, dumbfuck. As for Ainus, you can tell a fucken difference between a Jap and an Ainu. ^^
ghoststrider45 4 months ago
@ghoststrider45 How come Japanese have haplogroup D but Koreans dont?
It's because there was no Indian migration to Korea.
Why Tibeto-Burman, Andaman Islander and Japanese have D? Because we are one genetic family related to Indians.
Kokunihon 4 months ago
@Kokunihon
Haplogroup D comes from Jomon, so Japanese are mixed, majority are Korean origin with admixtures of Ainu/Jomon blood. ^^
ghoststrider45 4 months ago
@ghoststrider45 Japanese are not related to the Koreans. Japanese are Jomons I already told you. Jomons came from INDIA not Asia.
Kokunihon 4 months ago
@Kokunihon
show me your grounds.
ghoststrider45 4 months ago
@ghoststrider45 I already showed you the evidence. Japanese D is found in Tibet, Thailand and Andaman Islands at 50%+. We Japanese didnt come from Korea or China. We Japanese are from South Asia. The O2b came from Tungus not Koreans.
Kokunihon 3 months ago
@Kokunihon
O2b origin is in border of Manchuria and Korean peninsula, Tungus? LOL
Japanese have majority O2b and O2b1 which is both Korean origin. ^^
ghoststrider45 3 months ago
@ghoststrider45
Actually they are more like 3/4 product of ainu + Koreans and 1/4 product of ainu + Chinese. If you look at the map, the Japanese are genetically closer to Korean, but they are closer to chinese than koreans are closer to chinese. Manchus are closer to Koreans, but they are also closer to mongolians than koreans are closer to mongolians. North chinese is close to tibetan, Himalayan, Bhutanese.
Average Japanese = 50% Korean + 35% Chinese + 15% Ainu
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane
I don't Chinese even filtered in their blood, japanese are more majority Korean DNA plus some Ainu due to having sex with them in island for so long.
ghoststrider45 3 months ago
@ghoststrider45
What you think matters not to me. There is no pure Japanese, they are all an mixture. Japanese are closer to Koreans but they are not koreans because they have much higher diversity.
3/4 of Koreans + Ainu AND 1/4 Chinese + Ainu = Modern Japanese. The graph shows western Japanese are slightly closer to chinese. While the rest of Japan is slightly closer to Koreans. Japanese from Okinawa and Hokkaido are the closest to ainu
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane
Yea, they are mixtures, but majority of them have Korean chromosome DNA, so you have any proof that Chinese dna even went into japan???
ghoststrider45 3 months ago
Comment removed
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ghoststrider45
YOU WANT PROOF??? the japanese are the one's who made an TV program about genetic sequence of Japanese. (The video is still on youtube btw). And it was the Japanese scientists claiming that there genetics have more in common with both the Koreans and Chinese. What more proof do you want? you can even read the genetic study japanese people.
Y-dna O2b 32% in Japan, Sino-tibetan O3a5 18% in japan (in western Japan 23%) , 40% ainu D2
Mtdna 60% Korean, 26% Chinese and 12% ainu
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
Indonesia is a big country and so many races and tribes in there ... Many people in Indonesia who have yellow skin,,, If thou to the island of Sumatra, Sunda, Nias, Borneo, West Java, North Sulawesi. You will see a very oriental, ... and most of Eastern Indonesia with a total of 10% of the population of Indonesia, they are people of black skin and very beautiful .. do not forget many people in Indonesia who have a mixture eroupean (= Indo ),
kartikasweet 4 months ago
Although both kazakhs and kyrgyz are mix of mongoloid and caucasoid. They are genetically similar to mongolians,siberians,tungustics. This is because they have portion of their asian blood is higher. Some mongolians also have caucasian dna. Which yet again links them more closer.
Koreans and Japanese basically have nothing to do with central asians.
mongolANDtamerlane 4 months ago
Hey guys I uploaded a new video that shows more recent genetic studies. It shows a genetic map of East Asia (2010 source). Genetics of Koreans, Japanese and Han Chinese (admixture studies) are also covered in great detail.
AltaicCivilization 4 months ago
@AltaicCivilization Actually Tibetan and Chinese are both the same race. They belonged to the Sino-Tibetan race grouping. Yet you listed Tibetan as a separate race from the Chinese. Unless you have a solid evidence or source, this cannot be claimed as a fact.
qwer8456 3 months ago
Comment removed
Anthony546580451 5 months ago
@Anthony546580451 Actually europeans are more related to africans (true fact). That is because europeans received more genetic flow from north africa into spain, italia, greece. Then later spread to other parts of europe. Also middle-easterns are more related to africans than europeans. Middle-eastern people are basically more related to north africans than they are to europeans.
eurofootball42 5 months ago
@eurofootball42 Southern Europeans have lot of african genes but european is just a huge term it doesn't refer to any exact ethnic race,so it is meaningless to argue whether europeans have how much african genes because they are SIMPLY just a bunch of totally different ethnic groups!
16ritzy 5 months ago
Comment removed
eurofootball42 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The video editor is so stupid and fake Lol thank you for proving koreans are not an altaic people, you have at least 50% of blue, you have more non-altaic genes than south chinese have austronesian which means korean people not Northeast asian. Lol I need to everyone about this video.The most funny question is he asked if han chinese are part of sino-tibetan so why are han chinese SOO DIFFERENT??? dumbass because north chinese is different south chinese. Ainu don't even look mongoloid
mercuyve 5 months ago
Comment removed
mercuyve 5 months ago
I think chinese are blacks of asia, japanese are italians of asia and koreans are nordics of asia.
eurofootball42 5 months ago
east and southeast Asian Mongoloid descent but there are some differences in skin color. east asia people have white skin and slanted eyes, while Southeast Asia has dark skin because of environmental and weather. if you've been to Indonesia many tribes - tribes that live in the mountains they have skin and eyes are not much different from those east asia are many theories that say they are the original mongoloid who came from mainland Asia that make up the Indonesian people today.
kartikasweet 5 months ago
@kartikasweet Genetically they are very different to Northeast Asians. Indonesians are mostly Austronesians. Check the 2009 study: "Mapping Human Genetic Diversity in Asia". It clearly shows Indonesians have majority Austronesian DNA in their genes.
AltaicCivilization 5 months ago
@AltaicCivilization :whether Austronesian very bad? what is wrong with Austronesian so you hate to Austronesian? Do you feel Korean is the most perfect person in this world? Austronesian are grup languagesis not a genetic , you are trying to learn more. Is genetic Indonesia are very close to the Taiwan Aboriginal / Polynesian or thai: Answers Indonesia are very close to thai. not whether we always insult others, thanks
kartikasweet 5 months ago
@kartikasweet When did I say Austronesians are "very bad"? Han Chinese, Indonesians, and other Southeast Asians are all genetically Austronesian. Austronesian is a linguistic term, however it can be a genetic term too if similarities among ethnic groups of a particular ethno-linguistic group can be established.
Indonesians are very close to other Southeast Asians.
AltaicCivilization 5 months ago
@AltaicCivilization indonesians, fillipinos, micronesians, macronesians, negritos,malaysians are all one big genetic family:) the thai-lao are not related to none of them!
shitnamese401 4 months ago
@shitnamese401 Yes that's correct. However Thai, Lao and Vietnamese are related to eachother. Indonesians, Filipinos, Micronesians, etc are admixed with Australoids which means they are a bit different from mainland Southeast Asians. However they are quite close to Thai, Lao and Vietnamese, just not as close to them as they are to eachother.
AltaicCivilization 4 months ago
@AltaicCivilization yes you are right! you can't compare mainland south east Asian countries to archipelago south East asian countries because mainland south east asian looks mores East Asian!
shitnamese401 4 months ago
@AltaicCivilization I just wanna add that cambodians are actually from Tibet but moved down to what is today cambodia!
shitnamese401 4 months ago
Comment removed
shitnamese401 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Malay and indonesians are 55-60 austro-asiatic (look at video). West indonesians have some indian dna, but 15% filipino and many east indonesian have austroloid dna.
Genetic cluster: (New study 2011)
Group 1: Mongolians, buryats, Kazakhs, evenki, kyrgyz,
Group 2: Manchus, Koreans, Japanese
Group 3: North chinese, tibetan, himalayans, Bhutanese
Group 4: Hakka, Cantonese, Minnan (south chinese)
Group 5: Vietnamese,cambodians, thai, indonesians, malay
Group 6: Filipino, Taiwan aborigines.
mongolANDtamerlane 4 months ago
@kartikasweet north east asians have yellow skin not white...
polychronio 5 months ago
Chinese are from Melanesians,,, Melanesians and chinese are from the same genetic family that is different from japanese, koreans and mongolians. Have a look at my new video
MelanesianChinese 6 months ago
@MelanesianChinese Your videos is ridiculous,this shows the world how stupid,ignorant and racist the koreans are.Now I know why Japanese and Chinese look down on koreans.Koreans are just totally comedic.
16ritzy 5 months ago
Comment removed
eurofootball42 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check my new videos! Chinese and Melanesians are from the same genetic family. Valid scientific proof provided
MelanesianChinese 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check my new videos! chinese and melanesians are from the same genetic family! proof from valid scientific sources provided
MelanesianChinese 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check my new video! chinese and melanesians are from the same genetic family. scientific proof provided!
MelanesianChinese 6 months ago
O3 is the predominant sub-group in north/east china.
south china more related to South east asia.
kartikasweet 6 months ago
No problem indonesian are austronesian but don't forget we don't have haplogroup C , D & K , Indonesians only have haplo O2a,O3, O1 and
Ra1 = 6%
Majority East Indonesians ( papua,timorese,moluccan =austroloids) they have high of haplo : C ,K, S,M , D chek wikipidia.
DNA west indonesians so defferent with DNA of east Indonesian,melanesian,
south pacifik & maori.
thanks
kartikasweet 6 months ago
Comment removed
eurofootball42 6 months ago
Comment removed
eurofootball42 6 months ago
@kartikasweet Koreans, manchu and samoyed = 100% northern mongoloid
South chinese and japanese = mongoloid and australoid mixed from recent autosome genetic studies.
Australoids look like dark japanese jomon (ainu)
eurofootball42 6 months ago
@eurofootball42 : yeah true..Korean pure northem mongoloids . The O2b sub-group is of high frequency in all Korean populations.but why japanese propoganda they have most of O2b ?
kartikasweet 6 months ago
@eurofootball42 The Ainu are not Australoid, but they may be related to Australoids. All genetic studies point to a theory that the Ainu are the most related to the Northeast Asians, but not really to the Australoids. The Han Chinese, Indonesians and Malays all have some significant Australoid admixture in their genomes. It's very evident and well established from the most recent genome-wide studies.
AltaicCivilization 6 months ago
@AltaicCivilization Anthropology data show that indigenous australian& ainu are from same australoid family. It's true that ainu's are mixed with yayoi japanese but before 20th century, ainu was mainly australoid& sakhalin fusion (pale australoid).
eurofootball42 6 months ago
@kartikasweet O1 is linked with Austronesian,O2 is linked with Daics.Haplogroup R is an Eurasian haplogroup which is more likely from India as you know SoutheastAsia was heavily influenced by emigrants from India and some other Southern Asian countries.
16ritzy 5 months ago
Comment removed
eurofootball42 5 months ago
@16ritzy 21.5% of northern chinese have O1 and 15% of southern chinese have O1. How do you explain why northern chinese have even greater frequency of O1a y-dna hg? don't forget that some buryat groups (west-central siberia) have 50% O1a.
Southeast asians have australoid origins (proto-dravidians). Pure australoids are australian aboriginies, melanesians and micronesians. Mixed australoids are mainly cambodian, vietnamese, filipinos and thai. Japanese are part australoid too (via jomon).
eurofootball42 5 months ago
@eurofootball42 Northern chinese don't have such high percentage of O1,more likely 1% to 5%.Southeast Asians are mongoloid too,but the melanesians and australoids are not.Yeah they used to live in Southeast Asia before the arrival of Mongoloids like austronesians and daic.
16ritzy 5 months ago
@eurofootball42 A large part of Southeast Asians have mixed with australoid but this doesn't mean they came from australoid,melanesian,micronesians or whatever,they were mongoloids originating from southern part of china before arriving in southeast asia and mixed with the australoid natives there who had a much smaller population.
16ritzy 5 months ago
@16ritzy A lot of southeast asians have australoid admixture. There are many chinese with australoid admixture too. Dont forget the aboriginal jomon japanese have significant australoid admixture (they could be considered as northern australoid group). There are archeological studies linking jomon japanese to australian aboriginies and pacific islanders.
eurofootball42 5 months ago
@eurofootball42 australoids used to live in east asia as well,there were australoid skeletons found in southern china,it shows that even before the austronesians and daics were originated from southern china,the australoids were already living in eastasia
16ritzy 5 months ago
I don't know if it's true but I get a feeling that a lot of Koreans on the net have an agenda is to prove Chinese austronesian, and Korean+ japanese are the only east asians. There is no such thing as north east Asians. Everyone in the eastern part of Asia is east Asians includes all south east Asians. The austronesians are just the mixture of south east Asia islanders like Indonesians and philipinos with people of the inner part of asia
jasluvtian 6 months ago
Comment removed
jinkigirlfriend 6 months ago
@owardis397 21 u are always trolling and keep bullshits without resources. just ignore such a wet fantasy dreamer.
toki1221 6 months ago
Taiwanese have 88% austronesian mtdna but it's diluted. Nothing to do with conquer with being conquered by chinese males , they just intermarried married them.
owardis397 6 months ago
Prof Edisson Liu of Hugo Mapping say :SEA peoples,Japanese, Tibet, mongolian,nort, central asia were originally NOT MONGOLOIDS but that mongoloids mixed with them. only korean and chinese=mongoloid original IT'S WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION.not true mongoloid original came from north or central asia but its true mongoloid original came from north/south korea and china.
Korean ---> O2b + O3 = Pure mongoloid
China ----> majoritas Haplo O3 = Pure mongoloid
japanese ---> D2 + O2b + O3 + C = mixed
kartikasweet 6 months ago
@kartikasweet
isolated island japan = mix??? continental china = pure???
u make no sense lol
toki1221 6 months ago
@kartikasweet btw, D2 is very rare. u can see only in japan (island) and tibet (mountain) and it means these ppl could keep a purity.
toki1221 6 months ago
Comment removed
owardis397 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@toki1221 It's disgusting, can you explain to me why Japanese have such high frequencies of D2 ? yet 99.9% of japanese look no different to pure asians. Why the heck do you have like 45% D2 yet there is almost no japanese that look jomon with the acception of you or ken hirai
owardis397 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kartikasweet
Sorry, there is no such thing as pure. It's your own imagination. lol
niamtxiv 6 months ago
So... What is the point again of this video? Waisting a few minutes of my life, thanks!?!
ibislee 7 months ago
Ainu bloodlines big eyes
Original Japanese small eyes. Japanese Yayoi (O2b) + Ainu (D2)
johnnydorama 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ainu blood, in South Korea
(Oh-Ji Ho) watch?v=fGGZ4dP-fBw
(Ji-yeon) watch?v=qHCSNFvwb24
(D2 Korea 15% O2b 36% found) O2b> D2 (O2b Conquest)
(D2 Japan 35% O2b 32% found) O2b and D2 (Half-Blood War)
johnnydorama 7 months ago
Though I'm not racist, I gotta this clip is not really a scientific study result but a whole bunch of racist stuffs.
herifuzhenguan2 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AltaicCivilization What does kingdoms have to do with genetics? anyway someone must have edited the table since it defies y-dna and mtdna data.Your 15-40% data is wrong,did you calculate these green bar charts in PERCENTAGE? I did,it shows north chinese have only about 5-7% austronesian,hakka 30%, cantonese 34%.Japanese 1.45%.Should turkmen,uzbeks,uyghurs be considered mongoloid even though they have 60% caucasoid dna and look more like caucasoid? Heck, even turkey have 7% mongoloid dna.
abeeaveb2 7 months ago
Comment removed
abeeaveb2 7 months ago
About Korean.
Korean island was first colonised by ancient Chinese.
By after that the island was invaded and colonised by different ethic groups for hundreds of times.
Modern Korean, should be descendants of many ethic groups !
--- No offense, Korean.
elzedleeu 7 months ago
Try to know the history of Han Chinese before making such comment !
Han Chinese is a complex of ethic groups. They met and mixed at BC times.
Hakka, in a very strict sense, represent the first ethic group who was introgressed by peoples from outside of (traditional sense) China. So in this aspect, Hakka should be the most pure Han Chinese. They traveled from Northern and Central China to South China ever since 2000 years ago.
elzedleeu 7 months ago
@elzedleeu Your Hakka Chinese has the most Austronesian DNA after Cantonese. In fact even Beijing (North China) have 15% Austronesian genes.
History does not tell anything about genetics. Historical documents do not correlate well with genetic data. Historical writing is not an objective way of looking at things. The most recent genetic studies show that Han Chinese do indeed have multiple origins.
AltaicCivilization 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization , In Chinese, Hakka means 'guest'. Hakka knows that they came from relatively Northern China (In fact, this is a trend of China history -- Han Chinese moved from north to South to escape from Nomadic Peoples's invasion).
So they treat themselves as guests (of south China). Their language is very similar to ancient Chinese (language, i mean.). And in fact, their language was used as national language in the past for quite a long time.
elzedleeu 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization And about history, personally, i think the history of China for the most recent 1 and a half century, has been distorted by the Communist Party. But the population history was recorded long long ago, and can be re-confirmed with certain ethic groups tradition and culture.
It should be reliable.
elzedleeu 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization Last but not least, I do not think it is proper to use biological history/ population demography to confirm or over-thrown historical facts. Culture is stronger and serves as a better criterial to really reflect history.
elzedleeu 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization
Human is not inbreeders. When Hakka moved to south China and science they have been there for such a long time (>1.5k years), it is not surprising to see nowdays they share genomic elements with South Asian people.
So the paper is not able to prove a distorted China History!
At most you can only say' Biologically, Han Chinese has a very complex history!".
To mistaken population history for Cultural history is incorrect ! To politicized the issue is even worse !!
elzedleeu 7 months ago
Comment removed
herifuzhenguan2 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization I dont think that chinese are full austronesian... they are part austronesian mixed.
Austronesian y-dna hg marker is O1, and han chinese males are 15% O1, so austronesian people from south came and conquered chinese woman at 15% rate. Chinese O3 rate is about 30-70%. Tibetan O3 rate is about 50-80% too. Korean O3 rate is about 30-50%.
What your history is about chinese... chinese is influenced by a lot of cultures, not just southeast asia, but also korea, japan, mongol
eurofootball42 7 months ago
@eurofootball42 Are you fucking monkey stupid? there was never such historical fact.More like the other way around. There is 35% austronesian mtdna and 15% O1 in south chinese but it's diluted.
Cantonese have 7.8% O1
Hakka have 20%
20 million Taiwanese people = Southern chinese men + taiwanese aborigines.
(Read wikipedia taiwanese which is genetically proven)
owardis397 6 months ago
@abeeaveb2 : Nice Your Posting .. yeach genetic majority Indonesians more related to thai and viet than to grup austronesian peoples aborigine taiwan , hawai and filipina...but don't forget malaysians have mixed dravida gene.
kartikasweet 7 months ago
@AltaicCivilization : majority of people in indonesia are of daic descent , only Aborigin taiwan, filipina, polynesian,canton has any significant austronesian descent. You know all Indonesians never hate Korean.
but please don't brings Indonesia name with your rubbish postings. Thank you case closed !
kartikasweet 7 months ago
@abeeaveb2 That's why Chinese can't claim Northeast Asian kingdoms like Korean (Koguryo, Baekje, Shinra) and Jurchen (Jin, Qing) as theirs. Chinese have more Austronesian genes than Koreans and other Northeast Asians.
AltaicCivilization 7 months ago
Genetic indonesians so defferent with east Indonesia ( maluku/papua,) & Pacifik islander
kartikasweet 7 months ago
Austronesia, Altaic, Tai Kradai, Austro austik is not a race/ Genetic, but a language group.
Haplogroup (Asians) O1,O2,O3 = Genetic / DNA.
O1= Taiwan aborigine, filipina, malaysia, vietnam, indonesians, thai, south chinese
O2= Korea, Japanese, North Chinese,Thais, Indonesians, Vietnam, Central Asia
O2a = Thais, Indonesians, Vietnam, laos,Khemer
O2b = Siberia, Mongolia, Koreans,japanese, Tibet,North chinese
O3= Mongolia, Koreans, Chinese,Vietnam
----**** THIS REAL ABOUT GENETIC ASIA *** ---
kartikasweet 7 months ago
@kartikasweet Your data is an HUGE MISTAKE and A HELL OF AN STRETCH, particularly your O1 and O2b
O1 - 90% taiwan aborigines, 46% filipino, 30% malay,indonesian. South chinese 15%, vietnam 10% ,thailand only 6% ( seriously only 6% and you include thais?)
O2b koreans,japanese it is ALMOST non-existant in north chinese,tibet,siberian
abeeaveb2 7 months ago
Northern asian and northeast asian looks like alien and very ugly !!!!… Southern Chinese and austronesian people are more beautiful with bigger eyes etc,,
shoexy 8 months ago
@shoexy Southern chinese are not that related with austronesian. Their still more related with to north han chinese. North chinese are less than and south chinese has 2/3 or 66% similarity to han chinese.If you calculate the bar chart Austronesian dna North han chinese 7% Hokkien 28% Hakka 30% Cantonese 34% Non-chinese Zhuang 45% Filipino 94% Amis 96%.
owardis397 7 months ago
@neo91787 I think you should look into the real history distortion... Naoki Kouziro, Shinichi Fujimura ring any bells?
The forgery scandal was a systematic problem of Japanese academia of archaeology and the Ministry of Education. Conscientious Japanese scholars admit their forged history is dated back to the 8 Century Japan. Professor Naoki Kouziro of Osaka City University(大阪市立大学) confessed that part of Nihon Shoki (日本書紀, にほんしょき, 720 A.D.) was forged to elongate the early history of Japan.
icchiism 8 months ago
The Japanese don't want to be related to history liar Koreans.
neo91787 8 months ago
Comment removed
icchiism 8 months ago
The Cavalli-Sforza book does not place each and every Han Chinese under the Austronesian classification. At the most broad level, Chinese are broken down to 'Northern' and 'Southern' groups. The 'Northern Chinese' subgroup converges with that of other 'northern' subgroups like the Tibetans, Tungus, Korean, and Japanese. It is the 'Southern Chinese' group that converges with those belonging to Austronesian group.
Waterflux 8 months ago
@Waterflux THAT still doesn't make sense.The graph shows south chinese are at least 66% closer to han chinese unlike filipino have 94% austronesian( green). While south chinese have over 60% tai (blue) including 5-10% (yellow) This means south chinese are at 2/3 closer to han chinese.If you look calculate bar chart in percentage. southern chinese have at least 58-60% blue and 28-34% green with 4.5 to 11% yellow.Filipino and amis 94% green, 3% blue and 1% yellow.
owardis397 7 months ago
@kyoani32
WTF? Why do you people come to Korea to do plastic surgery? Jealously? Inferior complexity? Koreans are one of the tallest, handsome, etc. race in Asia. hahahha XD
TheHaraboji 8 months ago
@kyoani32 well most people in real life dont even know what altaic is. either way everyone has different ideals of beauty. my perception would be buryats/yakuts/ or northern people from siberia. other people might not think so
iHornyTroll 8 months ago
turk=mongol=korea=japan
Vietnam=China=Cambodia=Laos= and all other southern asia.
TheKojana 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Indonesians 71 % are daic, Austronesian only 20% , Papua 8 %
Stop Racist to China, Philipine, indonesia, Malaysia ..we are Mongoloid
and You know China, Japan, Korea , Mongolia are One Race . Thank's
kartikasweet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Indonesians 71 % are daic, Austronesian only 20% , Papua 8 %
Thanks...
Stop racist to China, Philipine, Indonesia and malaysia
kartikasweet 8 months ago
Japanese ainu were hunter-gatherer. the difference = farming style. Ainu had no farming technology, but Manchuria and Korea had farmers due to good climate. japanese also had good climate but no technology. so korean developed better iron-age weapons to defeat japan kyushu and honshu island, spreading O2b1a-gene to japanese ainus. also japanese woman has 30% mtdna D which is siberian&manchurian origin. but japanese woman also have 30% mtdna M, N9a and Y(ainu gene).
eurofootball42 8 months ago
@eurofootball42 Well when the westerners first came, they even claim they were caucasian, some claim aryan other claim middle eastern because of their hairy bodies,long beards,and caucasian like features.Pure ainu are actually lighter than japanese,darker ainu skin is from labouring in the sea in briny winds all the day, ainu have keep indoors is found to be as white as any western men.
Btw where is your proof japanese has 30% ainu mtdna? M7a 12-15%, N9a 3% , Y 0.6% an maximum of 18% at max.
owardis397 8 months ago
@owardis397 jomon have 0% caucasian dna. they don't look caucasion, they represent australoid like you have stated here. ainu can come in different colors, just like japanese can be tanned or pale. from pictures, ainu look darker than average japanese.
eurofootball42 8 months ago
Comment removed
owardis397 8 months ago
Ainu were mistake for caucasian in pass by many western visitors and anthropologist who visited the ainu. South americans indians are very dark too,it has to do with climate and exposure to sun all day. Fishermen tend to have darker skin than average person and ainu economy depended on the fishing industry.I've seen many white skinned ainu too,but pure ainu are lighter skinned than japanese, the dark ones you see are from labouring the sea all days,otherwise they would never have been so dark.
owardis397 8 months ago
Japanese D2 is only Y-dna. SNP-study on autosomes does not look at Y-dna, it looks at all genes that make up tissues, facial structure, bone structure, etc, etc. that is too many for human to count (billions of sequences). therefore japanese D2 is just male marker from negrito/southeast asian people, but japanese was mixed too much with north asians, so they have more autosomal SNP-gene related to korean&mongolian.
eurofootball42 8 months ago
@eurofootball42 The only altaic in japan from korean.Haplogroup D2 is as different from other D. As mongolian C3 is as different from other C haplogroup.Ainu physical traits and appearance have nothing to do with southeast asian on negrito, I'll admit they even look very caucasian,very hairy,long beards but smaller in stature and genetically australoid.
I've should make myself clear
Ainu men + Korean women = majority of japanese
Korean men + ainu women = minority of japanese.
owardis397 8 months ago
@owardis397 I agree japanese ainu looks like australoid but genetic evidence refuted this in the past. I don';t think they look caucasoid/aryan. Japanese is 40% D2. rest is majority O2b1a&O3a3c, about 50-60%. korean O2b* is more common in manchuria searched by wiki. O2b1a is descendant people from korean to japanese kyushu and honshu island. So no-one is majority of another. Japanese woman also have higher mtdna hg N9a, M7a and Y (typical Ainu mtdna marker) ~ 30%.
eurofootball42 8 months ago
Ainu men + korean women = Japanese people
So what makes japanese northeast asian with their high D2? ainu don't look like asians.The only south chinese with high austronesian admixture is taiwanese.North chinese cluster with tibetan and south chinese generally just have 15% of haplogroup O1, in contrast to taiwanese aborigines 90%, filipino 46%.
owardis397 9 months ago
That's funny north han chinese cluster with tibetans.What makes japanese northeast asian, when they have high frequency of haplogroup D2???
Ainu men + Korean women = Japanese people