what a sexy man...and interesting artist...as a young man and artist...I had a thing for picasso...in his younger years he was something to be reckoned with...quite the stud muffin...and very well endowed.
Tired of fake spiritual enlightenment information?Not satisfied with what you have found?intuition, healing powers, it is all part of human nature.Search no more, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM is the end of the road.
A 2-dimensional plane can only be a representation of some "thing." In order for a person to pictorially represent the 4th dimension, they must FIRST represent the 3rd dimension, through "perspective" and the representation of 3-dimensional "space." The third dimension was, admittedly, purposefully eliminated by Picasso. Not only is it not a representation of the 4th dimension, it is NOT even a representation of the 3rd dimension. Picasso was no genius, he was a buffoon at best.
In 1480 Leonardo da Vinci produced the world's first, and only, visual musical equivalent. This is what enabled art to acquire the title of "Art." This visual music contains a mathematical syntax. Experiencing of this syntax requires a developed cognitive capability. A prerequisite to this is a person's ability to cognize "space." We can actually "see" this ability degenerating from 1480 to 1880, with the introduction of Picasso, and the elimination of "intelligence" in and of "Art."
Picasso was/is Picasso... Einstein was/is Einstein... We should honor them by sharing their contributions... By respecting their marks on History. Hopefully we will learn to with them.
Want to get in touch with your true higher self?Tired of ending up with the same old information on every page?paranormal powers, psychic readings, it is all possible.This is the time to lift the veil THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM .
on the contrary, Picasso was never in search. He said that there is no development process in his works and whatever he painted belonged to the moment he was in, to the present. So we don't really see a chronological progress in his work except for his cubism period: from 1904 to 1914.
No my friend he was not a Master painter at all. He is as Albert Einsten is the CREATOR of a NEW UNIVIRSE.
He was a genious that had transiented our concept of space in our mischivious 3 dimensionals concept of what is our own reality of the limited human brain.
A quote from other great man contemporaneous of this "mediocre " that did not conform to the traditional standard orthodox concept of the communes and yes he also was a mediocre young student so : "
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thought in clear form."
All of you that are saying that Picasso did not know how to paint or deared to say that he was mediocre go ahead and just ignore Picasso and you will notice the vast empty space and time of the human misery.
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."
Anybody who thinks Picasso can draw has no artistc eye. He is mediocre at best even as a teenager. There are so many artist more talented than this guy, but Picasso was a total sell-out and gained wealth and fame by pandering to the wealthy and tasteless and he sucks pretentious people into his bs to this day which is the real genius of Picasso. Put a million dollar price tag on a gum wrapper and his fans would fawn over that too. What sheep...
Well you never understood what he wanted to show the world. You can call the paintings which have natural forms that we all see around as artistic. But what picasso and buddies thought at that time was that, its something that even a camera can depict. So where is the art in it? So these buddies came up with a great idea to reduce the picture that we generally see into geometrical fragments, highlighting those perspectives that catches our emotions from different angles...
@Fuwuttevas There is no doubt that fame does have this effect on the famous and followers, but there is no doubt this man had talent. He would not have gained so much recognition if he did not, he is valuable to the art world because he changed modern art. The man invented collage. And I myself believe his earlier work of realism is not 'mediocre at best' but impressive at the least.
@melodel2 By your reasoning, Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian should be given honorary places in the louvre...also, how the hell did Picasso invent Collage? I can understand him inventing cubism, but collage was around since the invention of paper in china. Everyone acts like he's so innovative because he doesn't paint photoreal. Nobody does. Monet didn't paint photoreal. Kahlo didn't paint photoreal. Hell, even Valesquez at least altered some perspective. difference is they were artist.
@Fuwuttevas Okay, I heard it in an interview, I guess I was wrong. Should have said, "first to use collage in his paintings rather than drawings". Better? I think he is innovative. His early work was realism. You don't believe he is considered even an artist?
@DragonflyGirl09 Yes; as difficult as it is to believe, after more than 130 years of art successfully rejecting the notion that it needs to realistically depict nature to be "good" or powerful or moving, the ignorant, unaware of worlds of expression and creativity, insist that somehow this is still what it means for art to be good. Ignore them; they are sad, ignorant stupid cows.
To all those who say Picasso couldn't draw... Have you seen, by any chance, his early pencil drafts? Are those the work of someone who couldn't draw? Come on. Get informed, guys. And i mean INFORMED.
Why do people say he couldn't draw? Have you seen some of his photorealistic paintings, they are amazing. What made him unique was that he had his own style and didn't conform to the 'norm'. If a person is passionate about something, then nothing will stop him/her from pursuing it.
cprstudio is right..at this age picasso...got to a different style of art, from what he started..but that's because he wanted to be unique..not some simple arist..who makes good realism..
@hayouni1968 Stop writing bullshit: Picasso was a child protigy.Hes technique was marvelious in his teens.Where were rembrand or raphael in this age.in the ending 19.th and 20.century painting was obsolet compared whith the time before Photograpy and had to find another role in the arts.Idiotie to compare such epoches.PICASSO WAS THE GREATES PAINTER IN 20.CENTURY
@xylfox Only a quick note. Picasso wasn't a child prodigy and his technique as a teen was by no means marvellous. That's a myth created by Picasso itself and supported by some starstruck critics. If you compare what he painted in his teens to what other geniuses did at the same age (for example Da Vinci or Raphael) you'll see he looked like a beginner. Of course I agree he did fantastic things afterwards.
to understand picasso is to read his life story. to understand art fully you need to be an artist too. to me, picasso's art is very personal to him, we need to dig deeper to his mind and personality to understand them. Picasso's creations are not junks, they are very matured artworks. It took him a lifetime to learn to do such artworks.
@lubime10 nope, we don't. the only ones who think they ought to criticize are the ones who've never created art themselves... especially not the kind that has influenced other people. which is exactly what picasso did. you can't just make art for the sake of expression. it HAS to involve much of life... people... especially when that inspiration comes from pretty much life itself.
although comments like : "Picasso couldn't draw" and "he's not an artist" and the like are ignorant remarks in a way. It's good for those who think so to utter them, because they can be corrected. And start a discussion about art. Art is something you have to talk about. It's not there only to look at in awe. By talking and discussing art you form your ideas and opinions and give art more value. And often some of those discussions start with simplistic remarks.
@Ibringthetruth1 Some people these days don't know jack sh*t what they're talking about when it comes to real masters back in the day. There's a reason why masterpieces are worth millions of dollars, not photographs. And it's due to the craftsmanship of the artist who began with portraits before photography came into the "picture" (no pun intended). Artists back then knew what they were doing. They revolutionized much of the world because of their skills.
@QuoGirl but Picasso's paintings are worth millions. You see his influence in architecture, graphic arts and even literature. He influenced Corbusier and Mies who went on to change architecture as we now know it. They didn't need to see the old masters to create new buildings....they needed a forward thinker like Picasso to show them the way. Can you tell me how the old masters influenced architecture in their times?
@Ibringthetruth1 - yes those people are called illustrators. You can purchase any number of super realistic paintings. Just because you can paint like a photograph doesn't mean that the painting is automatically fantastic. My friend is one of the top horse and horse racing painters in the world but I find her works to be prosaic as I'd just as soon look at a photograph. A more interesting realistic painting to me is Christina's world because there seems to be a story behind it.
"RE PICASSO draftsmanship : PICASSO was , hands down , th GREATEST DRAFTSMAN of th 20th century ---he had truly great powers of INVENTION and he was also a great SCULPTOR --his TASTE was impeccable and his IMAGINATION prodigious "
His gift and passion shine here , if you cant see that theres no hope for you, in my opinion people who doubt Picassos ability are stagnant and might just open up ... if they grow up !.
Art is not about a pretty picture its about Feelings, its about Life, ts about Love, its about Death, its about Beauty & PASSION " think a while , let go a little ... !!
Picasso laughed all the way to the bank. He nearly destroyed art by turning paintings into financial investments rather than true expression. Get off the Picasso bandwagon and think for yourself. Everyone defending this man makes these vague statements on how art is life and love. Think independantly and really ask yourself what you specifically like about his paintings. If you can't answer that, congratz..you are another pretentious herb making the fine art scen a joke.
even if he couldnt draw it doesnt make him a bad artist, its the contribution he has made to the world, breaking the norm and taking art - design - culture - life into and a new place. This is what art searches for and the pilot who takes us that place is someone we all should respect. I suggest people need to read up about how art has sculpted are own society through time. The ultimate human expression and gift we have over anything else in this world is to question why what if, and how- ART
You need to look at some of his very early works. All were drawn beautifully and realistically. Picasso was someone who liked to challenge himself and the viewer.
@cprostudio But he could draw like Raphael and Ingres! He was classically trained and had an extraordinary gift as a draftsman. He was trying to move art in a different direction.
@cprostudio by the way, he was a magnificent drawer. He was magnificent at a very early age too as he was a teen prodigy. His father was an artist. He was the youngest person ever accepted to the famous academy he attended and while others took days to do a drawing for entrance, he took just an hour.
He didn't do realistic drawings because they had been done ad nauseum and remember that by that time, photography had come into its own so we could see realistic depictions in photographs.
@melodel2 what you talking about? read my original comment again and you will see that i am responding to someone who said he could not draw etc etc, i then said, "even if he couldn't draw". I know he could draw, i was just raising an argument against someone elses statement SILLY WILLY
@cprostudio It is an understandable error considering you did not click the 'reply' button when you made that post as I see no "@" symbol. Sillay sillay ;)
Picasso was brilliant in that he knew how to take advantage of sheep minded-people for his own gain. Not surprisingly, people with lots of money and poor taste embrace that concept. I like his art the same way I like disco music. It was before my time and no longer relevant, but it is so bad that I like it in an ironic way.
For anyone doubting his ability as an artist, look up his first communion painting. I believe he did it when he was only 15 or so. For lack of a better word, its perfect.
There is a picasso statue by him of his wife in my town at the archipelago and it has to be the wierdest ugliest piece of art I have ever seen.... this guy just got lucky to find someone with the same bad taste as him to fame his crap i think ahaha
I agree . "Picasso" was always trying something new. That is what made him great. Unlike artist that try to find a style and then do the same things over and over. "Goatmanartist"
NOTE>>>PLZ READ! IF U ARE INSPIRED BY PICASSO AND HIS WORK PLZ SEND ME VIDEO SHOWING UR PICTURES INSPIRED BY HIM OR TELL SOMETHING ABOUT URSELF AND UR INS. im making small movie about picasso and people he inspires...so i would be glad to see ur videos:)
This is silly. Picasso was in fact the greatest artist who ever lived. For draftsmanship look at "The First Communion," which he painted at age 14. For sensationalism look at "Guernica," "Three Musicians," or "Demoiselles D'Avignon." For color mastery look at "Two Acrobats with a Dog," or anything from the rose period. For commitment to craft look at any of his intaglio and lithography prints. Learn what litho and etching are as processes, then look at how he did them. The case is simple.
Most people view artists as masters and their works as masterpieces only after others tell them to . Picasso's very early stuff was and still is excellent but the work he's best known for could have been done by anyone, even a child.
Picasso was not looking for beauty, he was searching for artistic expression, another way to look at life. Isnt that all what we're trying to do as well? Just because you are a draftsman par excellence (which picasso was, for the record) doesnt mean you are a great artist, likewise vice versa.
Hmmm. I am going to agree with @insertcooluser - the main thing about art is not so much about talent (although I must say it is also a *major* factor in consideration) but how in an artist's mind he is supposed to render an emotion or an expression right into visual expressionisms.
I must inform that I am no art expert or anything, but really Picasso's works are a shred of puzzle. Every thing in it seems to come from his Cardiac system.
Another expressionist artist: Antonio Fuentes ( Tangiers, 1905 - 1995 ), an oustanding memeber of L'Ecole de Paris - La Grande Chaumière, 1928 , and the ponly great master born and dead in Tangiers.
My GOD picasso is the greatest artist! i've seen his work in his early years he can do photorealistic paintings as well be fluid in any form of art this is a real grand master!
@koenbp What I'm saying that in realism, once you have the skills down, everything is handed to you. You just have to walk outside, paint the landscape you see, and wa la you have a masterpiece! Other styles like abstract, surrealism, ect. take some serious planning and thinking before you even have an idea. Plus, the reason artists become successful in the first place is because they're original. In realism, you're the complete opposite, you just copy what you see.
@koenbp Sorry but realism isn't "the art". The only thing more important in art than skill (which realism requires, of coarse) is the mentallity behind the piece. That includes styles, themes, the subject of the piece, ect. What I'm saying is that almost anyone can paint like rembrandt if they have the money for the amount of art classes it requires, but no one can teach you about originality or ideas for a piece outside of realism. Realism is just for those with little imagination, pretty much.
Best video i have ever seen. if you look extremely deep on it, it will give your tears. This is a man who does what he loves doing, something many of us don't do.
Jesus Christ, the discussions on these boards are so freeking idiotic. This is one of the greatest artists in history and you're all "deciding" whether he is or not. Assholes.
Science is objective, art is subjective. Einstein has proved his certain theoretical hypothesis in equations. It is like 2x2=4, means that you cannot have an opinion here. Shakespeare's analytical contributions are not questionable, but you can certainly comment about how you feel when you read or hear them. And when I look at Picasso's work I only see a technique revealing crude lines, dark/pale colors. Looking at his art doesn't make me feel good, I rather look at fairy art in children books.
Science is objective, art is subjective. Einstein has proved his certain theoretical hypothesis in equations. It is like 2x2=4, means that you cannot have an opinion here. Shakespeare's analytical contributions are not questionable, but you can certainly comment about how you feel when you read or hear them. And when I look at Picasso's work I only see a technique revealing crude lines, dark/pale colors. Looking at his art doesn't make me feel good, I rather look at fairy art in children books.
There seems to be a few questioning whether Picasso is/was great or not. He is/was great - whether you like his work or not is irrelevant, as is whether you thought he was a nice chap.
"If you know exactly what you are going to do, what is the point in doing it?"
Look at Picasso's early paintings and drawings at the On-line Picasso Project, if you doubt he could actually draw. (Choose "Artworks" from the top menu to show his output year by year.)
It's the best website of his works that I've ever seen.
@tuftybox1821 Picasso famously once said, "I could paint like Rembrandt by the time I was 18. It took me another 60 years to learn to paint like a child."
@koenbp Profession? Profession kills the creativity of humanity my brother. Profession is something that you do to be limited yourself. I don't think people should be profession.
If you fail to understand Picasso, please go home and open the book from the Art of history, and the history of Picasso before you come back and talk to us about YOUR Profession theories. Plus, I couldn't believe artists believes in Profession.
@wutsoevanevamind I admire Picasso, I really do. If I had to pull my own shit out of the toilet and grease it all over my atelier, hell, I'm sure I would pass out from the smell right away.
Anyone who faults Picasso for not being able to create realistic style art should see what he did as early as age fourteen. By the time he was twenty he had done his share of naturalistic portraits and scenes. If he had continued in that vein, we would not be talking about him today, because there are sooo many others who can do that (albeit at much older ages and after many more art classes). Picasso stood on that sturdy ledge at a young age and jumped, and he just happened to fly.
Love this! Thanks for posting. I would like to have seen a clown juggling jelly-fish whilst his second cousin peels an onion on top of an enormous cigarette packet, but you can't have everything. Incidentally, if you enjoy watching hedgehogs balancing parsnips, you may also enjoy a site called icrappoetry (.com). Best wishes!
Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable.
@ThePhantomBlacksmith "Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable."
No: Picasso had his way with words. Einstein was a Great artist. Shakespeare was good at maff.
@ThePhantomBlacksmith "Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable."
No: Picasso had his way with words. Einstein was a Great artist. Shakespeare was good at maff.
@ThePhantomBlacksmith when einstein was a child,he was not smart until when he got lost in the jungle ang measured his distance to home with his thumb and that is the start of his intelligence
he made garbage because ppl would buy it anyway because of his reputation, he said so himself. Anyone pretending they know something about art and calling him one of the best artist even, does in fact prove he doesnt know shit about it.
@ThePhantomBlacksmith i think it was because his stories were against the grain and something new to the theatre scene. kind of like picasso. something new not recycled ideas
@thegreatfearblog In my opinion, everybody has their own definition for the term "beauty"(I might think that Keira Knightley is beautiful, but you might not) that is why art can't be “beauty”
@GentlemanGhost1 I disagree, and let me use your example to explain my point: I might think that Keira is less beautiful than, let's say, Megan Fox or Ava Garder, fair enough. But wouldn't you think of me of having a distorted sense of beauty if I were to tell you I though women without fibromyxoma of maxilla or some other horrible facial deformity are not beautiful? And isn't placing a Picasso or a Van Gough with a Reubens or a Rembrandt an equivalent exercise?
@thegreatfearblog This is how I think about it, a girl with an ugly face might have a graceful and pure heart and a girl with a beautiful face may not have pure heart, it is the same with art, an abstract art might convey a meaningful massage when a realistic art may fail to do so, vice versa :)
@GentlemanGhost1 Yes, but you gave the Keira example as an example of form only, I was replying to that. The "message" is where the scam lies. That's how we get to the absurd of having John Cage sitting in front of the piano silently and call that music! And the worst problem of modern "art" is not even it uglyness, but the fact that it is actually messageless and empty. My video "The War Against Art" explains that to an extent, and it also explains WHY these forms of antiart are promoted.
@thegreatfearblog when you are looking at arts like this you should look at the massage it is tying to convey,not at how realistic it is because these styles were invented to convey complex massages and philosophical ideas that are hard to be conveyed trough realistic art
great footage, my only complait is it is not nearly long enough.:(
romeodaphne 1 month ago
My only objection is that it's not called square-ism.
quakerninja 1 month ago
In 1480 Leonardo da Vinci produced the world
110TwujHuj574 1 month ago
This video inspires me...
j0k3rZ451 1 month ago
Its just beautiful nothing else to say 28 seconds of passion for creation
Roxana0597 1 month ago
WOW! I love you Pablo Picasso, I really do.
roro4ever 2 months ago
what a sexy man...and interesting artist...as a young man and artist...I had a thing for picasso...in his younger years he was something to be reckoned with...quite the stud muffin...and very well endowed.
jetsonjoe 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
will this world occur "another Picasso" in future?
how's the modern art going on in nowadys' europe?
as most of us here that know more the "traditional" art in EU,but after the middle 20Century we know little abot it.
i am in oriental.
chrysina2011 2 months ago
the best artist
ebrevinil
vinilosdecorativos1 3 months ago
Picasso painted what he wanted, what his heart felt. most artists will do this. The ones that pander to what others like never grow themselves.
tdesanchez 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tired of fake spiritual enlightenment information?Not satisfied with what you have found?intuition, healing powers, it is all part of human nature.Search no more, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM is the end of the road.
MrMaryHalpin 7 months ago
A 2-dimensional plane can only be a representation of some "thing." In order for a person to pictorially represent the 4th dimension, they must FIRST represent the 3rd dimension, through "perspective" and the representation of 3-dimensional "space." The third dimension was, admittedly, purposefully eliminated by Picasso. Not only is it not a representation of the 4th dimension, it is NOT even a representation of the 3rd dimension. Picasso was no genius, he was a buffoon at best.
MrMikeludo 7 months ago
In 1480 Leonardo da Vinci produced the world's first, and only, visual musical equivalent. This is what enabled art to acquire the title of "Art." This visual music contains a mathematical syntax. Experiencing of this syntax requires a developed cognitive capability. A prerequisite to this is a person's ability to cognize "space." We can actually "see" this ability degenerating from 1480 to 1880, with the introduction of Picasso, and the elimination of "intelligence" in and of "Art."
MrMikeludo 7 months ago
Picasso was/is Picasso... Einstein was/is Einstein... We should honor them by sharing their contributions... By respecting their marks on History. Hopefully we will learn to with them.
morriganankh 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Want to get in touch with your true higher self?Tired of ending up with the same old information on every page?paranormal powers, psychic readings, it is all possible.This is the time to lift the veil THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM .
JamesonMary 7 months ago
No todos los días se puede ver a un pro trabajar lol!
CTCCoco 8 months ago
on the contrary, Picasso was never in search. He said that there is no development process in his works and whatever he painted belonged to the moment he was in, to the present. So we don't really see a chronological progress in his work except for his cubism period: from 1904 to 1914.
annette37a 9 months ago
No my friend he was not a Master painter at all. He is as Albert Einsten is the CREATOR of a NEW UNIVIRSE.
He was a genious that had transiented our concept of space in our mischivious 3 dimensionals concept of what is our own reality of the limited human brain.
lubime10 9 months ago
there are a few images of him skinny dipping with one of his young wives...and Picasso had one big schloog on him...a big one...
jetsonjoe 10 months ago
@jetsonjoe how would you know?
zw0ecool 9 months ago
A quote from other great man contemporaneous of this "mediocre " that did not conform to the traditional standard orthodox concept of the communes and yes he also was a mediocre young student so : "
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thought in clear form."
lubime10 10 months ago
@lubime10 He was a master painter...
zw0ecool 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of you that are saying that Picasso did not know how to paint or deared to say that he was mediocre go ahead and just ignore Picasso and you will notice the vast empty space and time of the human misery.
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."
lubime10 10 months ago
Comment removed
lubime10 10 months ago
Comment removed
lubime10 10 months ago
Thumbs up if you think Picasso has nice tits. :)
Theblessthefallfan 11 months ago
Anybody who thinks Picasso can draw has no artistc eye. He is mediocre at best even as a teenager. There are so many artist more talented than this guy, but Picasso was a total sell-out and gained wealth and fame by pandering to the wealthy and tasteless and he sucks pretentious people into his bs to this day which is the real genius of Picasso. Put a million dollar price tag on a gum wrapper and his fans would fawn over that too. What sheep...
Fuwuttevas 11 months ago
@Fuwuttevas
Well you never understood what he wanted to show the world. You can call the paintings which have natural forms that we all see around as artistic. But what picasso and buddies thought at that time was that, its something that even a camera can depict. So where is the art in it? So these buddies came up with a great idea to reduce the picture that we generally see into geometrical fragments, highlighting those perspectives that catches our emotions from different angles...
udayjee 11 months ago
@Fuwuttevas There is no doubt that fame does have this effect on the famous and followers, but there is no doubt this man had talent. He would not have gained so much recognition if he did not, he is valuable to the art world because he changed modern art. The man invented collage. And I myself believe his earlier work of realism is not 'mediocre at best' but impressive at the least.
melodel2 11 months ago
@melodel2 By your reasoning, Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian should be given honorary places in the louvre...also, how the hell did Picasso invent Collage? I can understand him inventing cubism, but collage was around since the invention of paper in china. Everyone acts like he's so innovative because he doesn't paint photoreal. Nobody does. Monet didn't paint photoreal. Kahlo didn't paint photoreal. Hell, even Valesquez at least altered some perspective. difference is they were artist.
Fuwuttevas 11 months ago
@Fuwuttevas Okay, I heard it in an interview, I guess I was wrong. Should have said, "first to use collage in his paintings rather than drawings". Better? I think he is innovative. His early work was realism. You don't believe he is considered even an artist?
melodel2 11 months ago
hahaha this is the music from "The Greatest Game Ever Played"
Dankychron 11 months ago
Gode-Like : The greatest
wisesatyr72 11 months ago
Seriously? Are people really going around judging art by how "realistic" it looks? Philistines!
DragonflyGirl09 1 year ago
@DragonflyGirl09 Yes; as difficult as it is to believe, after more than 130 years of art successfully rejecting the notion that it needs to realistically depict nature to be "good" or powerful or moving, the ignorant, unaware of worlds of expression and creativity, insist that somehow this is still what it means for art to be good. Ignore them; they are sad, ignorant stupid cows.
wsmyers55 11 months ago
To all those who say Picasso couldn't draw... Have you seen, by any chance, his early pencil drafts? Are those the work of someone who couldn't draw? Come on. Get informed, guys. And i mean INFORMED.
Tonnygun 1 year ago
Why do people say he couldn't draw? Have you seen some of his photorealistic paintings, they are amazing. What made him unique was that he had his own style and didn't conform to the 'norm'. If a person is passionate about something, then nothing will stop him/her from pursuing it.
rom2014 1 year ago
It isnt about the lines, its about the spaces between them
HateClips 1 year ago
cprstudio is right..at this age picasso...got to a different style of art, from what he started..but that's because he wanted to be unique..not some simple arist..who makes good realism..
rorrandy 1 year ago
I would like to know who wrote/performed the song.
birgerbockwurst 1 year ago
hey wow I did the same with some crayon when I was 4-5 :DD IMA ARTIST!
RockingHood1 1 year ago
@RockingHood1 An idiot more likely
thechules 1 year ago
@thechules Jeeeez you are mean I bet picasso would have laughed
RockingHood1 1 year ago
@Fuwuttevas sorry if i offended you, i was having a bad day.
querovideos 1 year ago
@ saintmj57
For you it will be very difficult to differentiate a mice from an elephant.
lubime10 1 year ago
He was a bit of a theif imo. A lot of his paintings seem derivative of other peoples works but he had a phenomenal eye.
Stube437 1 year ago
Absolute GENIUS. I believe that if Picasso were alive today he would experiment with graffiti art.
scapemartinez 1 year ago
im annoyed there wasnt more to this video
jesusthe13th 1 year ago
pablo is a shit
hayouni1968 1 year ago
@hayouni1968 Stop writing bullshit: Picasso was a child protigy.Hes technique was marvelious in his teens.Where were rembrand or raphael in this age.in the ending 19.th and 20.century painting was obsolet compared whith the time before Photograpy and had to find another role in the arts.Idiotie to compare such epoches.PICASSO WAS THE GREATES PAINTER IN 20.CENTURY
xylfox 1 year ago
@xylfox Only a quick note. Picasso wasn't a child prodigy and his technique as a teen was by no means marvellous. That's a myth created by Picasso itself and supported by some starstruck critics. If you compare what he painted in his teens to what other geniuses did at the same age (for example Da Vinci or Raphael) you'll see he looked like a beginner. Of course I agree he did fantastic things afterwards.
bordereye 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe that this artist is producing shit
he's a pig dirty piece of colonial shit
his art belongs to a dirty country
colonial shitty spaniards who kill bulls for a sport
spain is a dirty place in total crisis
hayouni1968 1 year ago
Comment removed
hayouni1968 1 year ago
to understand picasso is to read his life story. to understand art fully you need to be an artist too. to me, picasso's art is very personal to him, we need to dig deeper to his mind and personality to understand them. Picasso's creations are not junks, they are very matured artworks. It took him a lifetime to learn to do such artworks.
reygood1 1 year ago
Picasso never painted like rembrandt or raphael ever. He's above average, but not in their league.
Fuwuttevas 1 year ago
Please, silence. Genius at Work
We do not need your stupids coment.
Do we ?
lubime10 1 year ago 50
@lubime10 nope, we don't. the only ones who think they ought to criticize are the ones who've never created art themselves... especially not the kind that has influenced other people. which is exactly what picasso did. you can't just make art for the sake of expression. it HAS to involve much of life... people... especially when that inspiration comes from pretty much life itself.
QuoGirl 1 year ago
@lubime10 that ole white dude looks CRAZY.......lol like a lot of artists
saintmj57 1 year ago
@lubime10 wait you do know its a video right RIGHT?
damn some people..
RockingHood1 1 year ago
@lubime10
although comments like : "Picasso couldn't draw" and "he's not an artist" and the like are ignorant remarks in a way. It's good for those who think so to utter them, because they can be corrected. And start a discussion about art. Art is something you have to talk about. It's not there only to look at in awe. By talking and discussing art you form your ideas and opinions and give art more value. And often some of those discussions start with simplistic remarks.
joostinspain 10 months ago
Comment removed
lubime10 1 year ago
i taught picasso how to paint
dizzygemini86 1 year ago
It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child.
Pablo Picasso
Elesparto 1 year ago 2
すごい決定力、画面をこれだけの手数で自分のものにしてる。
MrPikabio 1 year ago
What's the name of the whole movie?
MrRossmania 1 year ago
beautiful.
321bronnie 1 year ago
The conclusion is wrong. People don't want realistic paintings because of photography?
Surely that is wrong. It's economics. People want realistic paintings.
Maybe artists don't know how to do them anymore. There is a reason they were once called the 'MASTERS'.
not anymore.
Ibringthetruth1 1 year ago
@Ibringthetruth1 Some people these days don't know jack sh*t what they're talking about when it comes to real masters back in the day. There's a reason why masterpieces are worth millions of dollars, not photographs. And it's due to the craftsmanship of the artist who began with portraits before photography came into the "picture" (no pun intended). Artists back then knew what they were doing. They revolutionized much of the world because of their skills.
QuoGirl 1 year ago
@QuoGirl
Yes. I like Picasso but not sure that abstract + expressionism is on the same level as the great masters of realism.
Ibringthetruth1 1 year ago
@QuoGirl but Picasso's paintings are worth millions. You see his influence in architecture, graphic arts and even literature. He influenced Corbusier and Mies who went on to change architecture as we now know it. They didn't need to see the old masters to create new buildings....they needed a forward thinker like Picasso to show them the way. Can you tell me how the old masters influenced architecture in their times?
diggiemac 1 year ago
@Ibringthetruth1 - yes those people are called illustrators. You can purchase any number of super realistic paintings. Just because you can paint like a photograph doesn't mean that the painting is automatically fantastic. My friend is one of the top horse and horse racing painters in the world but I find her works to be prosaic as I'd just as soon look at a photograph. A more interesting realistic painting to me is Christina's world because there seems to be a story behind it.
diggiemac 1 year ago
"RE PICASSO draftsmanship : PICASSO was , hands down , th GREATEST DRAFTSMAN of th 20th century ---he had truly great powers of INVENTION and he was also a great SCULPTOR --his TASTE was impeccable and his IMAGINATION prodigious "
IDOLODORO2 1 year ago
Comment removed
TAZZAVERDEE 1 year ago
his face looks like bruce willis hehe
perker180 1 year ago
What kind of paint he was using ?
NijinoHaru 1 year ago
@NijinoHaru looks like enamel - he used th RIPOLEN brand
IDOLODORO2 1 year ago
great! 刹那の感性を芸術的キラメキをこの動画に感じました。up THANX!
ROSECROIX21 1 year ago
All of you who think that Picasso wasn't a great artist are total ignorants. Go read a book or something.
querovideos 1 year ago
@querovideos Ignorant isn't a noun you gimp mush brained twit.
Fuwuttevas 1 year ago
Dibujaba (muy bien) pero pintaba (muy mal)
RogMadrid 1 year ago
i like picasso as an artist, but im not sure i like him as a person. i cant say for sure though, gone too soon!
iansquared3 1 year ago
Why can't we give negative thumbs down scores??
Dirtbagging 1 year ago
those who dont like it are envy of him
Umapena 1 year ago
Please tell me the musical piece you have on this video-Thanks
MiltonJenkins 1 year ago
His gift and passion shine here , if you cant see that theres no hope for you, in my opinion people who doubt Picassos ability are stagnant and might just open up ... if they grow up !.
Art is not about a pretty picture its about Feelings, its about Life, ts about Love, its about Death, its about Beauty & PASSION " think a while , let go a little ... !!
KeithProctorArtist 1 year ago
Picasso laughed all the way to the bank. He nearly destroyed art by turning paintings into financial investments rather than true expression. Get off the Picasso bandwagon and think for yourself. Everyone defending this man makes these vague statements on how art is life and love. Think independantly and really ask yourself what you specifically like about his paintings. If you can't answer that, congratz..you are another pretentious herb making the fine art scen a joke.
Fuwuttevas 1 year ago
never understood why he got famous.
didondio 1 year ago
even if he couldnt draw it doesnt make him a bad artist, its the contribution he has made to the world, breaking the norm and taking art - design - culture - life into and a new place. This is what art searches for and the pilot who takes us that place is someone we all should respect. I suggest people need to read up about how art has sculpted are own society through time. The ultimate human expression and gift we have over anything else in this world is to question why what if, and how- ART
cprostudio 1 year ago 11
@cprostudio
You need to look at some of his very early works. All were drawn beautifully and realistically. Picasso was someone who liked to challenge himself and the viewer.
meisie41 1 year ago
@cprostudio But he could draw like Raphael and Ingres! He was classically trained and had an extraordinary gift as a draftsman. He was trying to move art in a different direction.
wordonfirevideo 1 year ago
@cprostudio by the way, he was a magnificent drawer. He was magnificent at a very early age too as he was a teen prodigy. His father was an artist. He was the youngest person ever accepted to the famous academy he attended and while others took days to do a drawing for entrance, he took just an hour.
He didn't do realistic drawings because they had been done ad nauseum and remember that by that time, photography had come into its own so we could see realistic depictions in photographs.
diggiemac 1 year ago
@cprostudio Who said he can't draw? Of course he could. It is what he did extensively to start his career as an artist.
melodel2 11 months ago
@melodel2 someone on this page, i suggest you look through the comments and speak to them
cprostudio 11 months ago
@cprostudio YOU said that silly
melodel2 11 months ago
@melodel2 what you talking about? read my original comment again and you will see that i am responding to someone who said he could not draw etc etc, i then said, "even if he couldn't draw". I know he could draw, i was just raising an argument against someone elses statement SILLY WILLY
cprostudio 11 months ago
@cprostudio It is an understandable error considering you did not click the 'reply' button when you made that post as I see no "@" symbol. Sillay sillay ;)
melodel2 11 months ago
@melodel2 ooops
cprostudio 11 months ago
oh except when he did realism as a teenager. Those were too mediocre to like.
Fuwuttevas 1 year ago
Picasso was brilliant in that he knew how to take advantage of sheep minded-people for his own gain. Not surprisingly, people with lots of money and poor taste embrace that concept. I like his art the same way I like disco music. It was before my time and no longer relevant, but it is so bad that I like it in an ironic way.
Fuwuttevas 1 year ago
brillant. Absolut awesome! Thanks
kunstmalerei 1 year ago
sing that picasso was a bad painter is like saying the kkk like black people
Paterson212 1 year ago
anybody know what film this is from?
paulyoldmac 1 year ago
Comment removed
gregbboy619 1 year ago
Grandiose !
kpowel 1 year ago
For anyone doubting his ability as an artist, look up his first communion painting. I believe he did it when he was only 15 or so. For lack of a better word, its perfect.
joejoejoemalin 1 year ago
There is a picasso statue by him of his wife in my town at the archipelago and it has to be the wierdest ugliest piece of art I have ever seen.... this guy just got lucky to find someone with the same bad taste as him to fame his crap i think ahaha
gaeddstank 1 year ago
i can pain better ;p
ttonyskater12343 1 year ago
I agree . "Picasso" was always trying something new. That is what made him great. Unlike artist that try to find a style and then do the same things over and over. "Goatmanartist"
goatmanartist 1 year ago
wait.. you're 'not saying picasso's a great artist'? Picasso is hands down the most influential and prominent artist of the 20th century.
zukhyubern 1 year ago
great to have this footage on youtube! inspire those artists!!! me too! subscribe to raeart!
raeart 1 year ago
he is just....don't have words....BRILLIANT!
NOTE>>>PLZ READ! IF U ARE INSPIRED BY PICASSO AND HIS WORK PLZ SEND ME VIDEO SHOWING UR PICTURES INSPIRED BY HIM OR TELL SOMETHING ABOUT URSELF AND UR INS. im making small movie about picasso and people he inspires...so i would be glad to see ur videos:)
send vids to picassomovie@ymail.com
thanksssssss
saharaaaa111222 1 year ago
picasso is unquestionable brilliance.
showmex3 1 year ago
he is so good at painting!
awesomecool00 1 year ago
Yes. He was the great painter of the twentieth century. There is no debate.
roeber73 1 year ago
This is silly. Picasso was in fact the greatest artist who ever lived. For draftsmanship look at "The First Communion," which he painted at age 14. For sensationalism look at "Guernica," "Three Musicians," or "Demoiselles D'Avignon." For color mastery look at "Two Acrobats with a Dog," or anything from the rose period. For commitment to craft look at any of his intaglio and lithography prints. Learn what litho and etching are as processes, then look at how he did them. The case is simple.
giblettog 1 year ago
@TRE1275 by a child? c'mon. you're an idot
girlbakerskateboards 1 year ago
Most people view artists as masters and their works as masterpieces only after others tell them to . Picasso's very early stuff was and still is excellent but the work he's best known for could have been done by anyone, even a child.
TRE1275 1 year ago
@TRE1275 you have missed the forward thinking nature of this man, within the context of his time period.
legabmusic 1 year ago
@TRE1275 your mother couldnt have done it. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh
girlbakerskateboards 1 year ago
Haha - also I am a little drunk. So bear with me - methinks my grammar constructions are in some place wrong below.
Sorry if it's quite fuzzy. Just had a dose of Heineken and can't seem to stop. Pure addiction.
Though who gives a damn - I love drinking.
elitist08 1 year ago
Picasso was not looking for beauty, he was searching for artistic expression, another way to look at life. Isnt that all what we're trying to do as well? Just because you are a draftsman par excellence (which picasso was, for the record) doesnt mean you are a great artist, likewise vice versa.
insertcooluser 1 year ago
Hmmm. I am going to agree with @insertcooluser - the main thing about art is not so much about talent (although I must say it is also a *major* factor in consideration) but how in an artist's mind he is supposed to render an emotion or an expression right into visual expressionisms.
I must inform that I am no art expert or anything, but really Picasso's works are a shred of puzzle. Every thing in it seems to come from his Cardiac system.
Really - Picasso is a great artist.
elitist08 1 year ago
Another expressionist artist: Antonio Fuentes ( Tangiers, 1905 - 1995 ), an oustanding memeber of L'Ecole de Paris - La Grande Chaumière, 1928 , and the ponly great master born and dead in Tangiers.
alfonsotanger1 1 year ago
My GOD picasso is the greatest artist! i've seen his work in his early years he can do photorealistic paintings as well be fluid in any form of art this is a real grand master!
sanmiguelarchangel 1 year ago
@koenbp What I'm saying that in realism, once you have the skills down, everything is handed to you. You just have to walk outside, paint the landscape you see, and wa la you have a masterpiece! Other styles like abstract, surrealism, ect. take some serious planning and thinking before you even have an idea. Plus, the reason artists become successful in the first place is because they're original. In realism, you're the complete opposite, you just copy what you see.
daCritic1000 1 year ago
@koenbp Sorry but realism isn't "the art". The only thing more important in art than skill (which realism requires, of coarse) is the mentallity behind the piece. That includes styles, themes, the subject of the piece, ect. What I'm saying is that almost anyone can paint like rembrandt if they have the money for the amount of art classes it requires, but no one can teach you about originality or ideas for a piece outside of realism. Realism is just for those with little imagination, pretty much.
daCritic1000 1 year ago
His soul is with us all ... My teacher!
grmekwalter 1 year ago
what's track(music) playing?...
x5291 1 year ago
this music is mistifying the artist. it's a man drawing. you don't need to play some miracle music. showing it like it is is enough.
corbravo 1 year ago
Best video i have ever seen. if you look extremely deep on it, it will give your tears. This is a man who does what he loves doing, something many of us don't do.
Magnificent video.
Ironandtheshizzelz 1 year ago
Jesus Christ, the discussions on these boards are so freeking idiotic. This is one of the greatest artists in history and you're all "deciding" whether he is or not. Assholes.
planetlennie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Science is objective, art is subjective. Einstein has proved his certain theoretical hypothesis in equations. It is like 2x2=4, means that you cannot have an opinion here. Shakespeare's analytical contributions are not questionable, but you can certainly comment about how you feel when you read or hear them. And when I look at Picasso's work I only see a technique revealing crude lines, dark/pale colors. Looking at his art doesn't make me feel good, I rather look at fairy art in children books.
berdansevinc 1 year ago
Science is objective, art is subjective. Einstein has proved his certain theoretical hypothesis in equations. It is like 2x2=4, means that you cannot have an opinion here. Shakespeare's analytical contributions are not questionable, but you can certainly comment about how you feel when you read or hear them. And when I look at Picasso's work I only see a technique revealing crude lines, dark/pale colors. Looking at his art doesn't make me feel good, I rather look at fairy art in children books.
berdansevinc 1 year ago
Did he ever experiment with homosexuality?
sptfgpn 1 year ago
There seems to be a few questioning whether Picasso is/was great or not. He is/was great - whether you like his work or not is irrelevant, as is whether you thought he was a nice chap.
"If you know exactly what you are going to do, what is the point in doing it?"
chimp1965 1 year ago
Look at Picasso's early paintings and drawings at the On-line Picasso Project, if you doubt he could actually draw. (Choose "Artworks" from the top menu to show his output year by year.)
It's the best website of his works that I've ever seen.
tuftybox1821 1 year ago 18
@tuftybox1821 Sure, I saw the stuff he painted when he was 15 year old, it really impressive!
MrGeorgesProfonde 1 year ago
@tuftybox1821 Picasso famously once said, "I could paint like Rembrandt by the time I was 18. It took me another 60 years to learn to paint like a child."
thelowmax 1 year ago 20
picasso is my best friend's ancestor !!!=D
xmass65ify 1 year ago
UGGLY PAINTINGS
bufbis2340 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Picasso was an opportunist ,without any talent.
bufbis2340 1 year ago
@bufbis2340
Why?
alessandro554 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiVerified 1 year ago
I think this 28 seconds had demonstrated he's either a father of modern art or rhetoric. I love his art, but I hate his selfishness to his wives.
wutsoevanevamind 1 year ago
@koenbp Profession? Profession kills the creativity of humanity my brother. Profession is something that you do to be limited yourself. I don't think people should be profession.
If you fail to understand Picasso, please go home and open the book from the Art of history, and the history of Picasso before you come back and talk to us about YOUR Profession theories. Plus, I couldn't believe artists believes in Profession.
wutsoevanevamind 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiVerified 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiVerified 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiVerified 1 year ago
@wutsoevanevamind I admire Picasso, I really do. If I had to pull my own shit out of the toilet and grease it all over my atelier, hell, I'm sure I would pass out from the smell right away.
Narweld 1 year ago
Anyone who faults Picasso for not being able to create realistic style art should see what he did as early as age fourteen. By the time he was twenty he had done his share of naturalistic portraits and scenes. If he had continued in that vein, we would not be talking about him today, because there are sooo many others who can do that (albeit at much older ages and after many more art classes). Picasso stood on that sturdy ledge at a young age and jumped, and he just happened to fly.
OctavioJames300 1 year ago
.... the father of average art more like it, :( he is the most overated artist ever!
Kurturmis 1 year ago
Love this! Thanks for posting. I would like to have seen a clown juggling jelly-fish whilst his second cousin peels an onion on top of an enormous cigarette packet, but you can't have everything. Incidentally, if you enjoy watching hedgehogs balancing parsnips, you may also enjoy a site called icrappoetry (.com). Best wishes!
Cantonaahh 1 year ago
really enthralling to watch...
LovingLifeandWords 1 year ago
Hated the classical music backround. This is no Reinassance art... IT'S THE OPPOSITE!
dependonme87 1 year ago
@dependonme87 hahahaha
wutsoevanevamind 1 year ago
song made me cry
rambaljr1 1 year ago
Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable.
ThePhantomBlacksmith 1 year ago 26
Comment removed
mrhumanamerican 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThePhantomBlacksmith "Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable."
No: Picasso had his way with words. Einstein was a Great artist. Shakespeare was good at maff.
mrhumanamerican 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThePhantomBlacksmith "Arguing whether Picasso was a great Artist or not? Was Einstein good at math? Did Shakespeare have a way with words? There are some things in this World that are just unquestionable."
No: Picasso had his way with words. Einstein was a Great artist. Shakespeare was good at maff.
mrhumanamerican 1 year ago
@ThePhantomBlacksmith when einstein was a child,he was not smart until when he got lost in the jungle ang measured his distance to home with his thumb and that is the start of his intelligence
Hardkor3webs 1 year ago
@ThePhantomBlacksmith
he made garbage because ppl would buy it anyway because of his reputation, he said so himself. Anyone pretending they know something about art and calling him one of the best artist even, does in fact prove he doesnt know shit about it.
Capeau 1 year ago
@ThePhantomBlacksmith shakespeare wasnt considered great until he died. while he was alive he was almost considered a joke.
hereHehereHE 1 year ago
@hereHehereHE Really? I did not know that. Maybe it had something to do with him being one of the ten people who could actually 'read' at the time.
ThePhantomBlacksmith 1 year ago
@ThePhantomBlacksmith i think it was because his stories were against the grain and something new to the theatre scene. kind of like picasso. something new not recycled ideas
hereHehereHE 1 year ago
@ThePhantomBlacksmith Not unquestionable at all. Picasso and all modern art is crap. So there.
thegreatfearblog 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblogIf you think modern or any kind of art is "carp”, you have no idea what art is... “art” is “creativity”
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
@GentlemanGhost1 No. Art should be Beauty, not creativity!
thegreatfearblog 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblog In my opinion, everybody has their own definition for the term "beauty"(I might think that Keira Knightley is beautiful, but you might not) that is why art can't be “beauty”
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
@GentlemanGhost1 I disagree, and let me use your example to explain my point: I might think that Keira is less beautiful than, let's say, Megan Fox or Ava Garder, fair enough. But wouldn't you think of me of having a distorted sense of beauty if I were to tell you I though women without fibromyxoma of maxilla or some other horrible facial deformity are not beautiful? And isn't placing a Picasso or a Van Gough with a Reubens or a Rembrandt an equivalent exercise?
thegreatfearblog 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblog This is how I think about it, a girl with an ugly face might have a graceful and pure heart and a girl with a beautiful face may not have pure heart, it is the same with art, an abstract art might convey a meaningful massage when a realistic art may fail to do so, vice versa :)
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
@GentlemanGhost1 Yes, but you gave the Keira example as an example of form only, I was replying to that. The "message" is where the scam lies. That's how we get to the absurd of having John Cage sitting in front of the piano silently and call that music! And the worst problem of modern "art" is not even it uglyness, but the fact that it is actually messageless and empty. My video "The War Against Art" explains that to an extent, and it also explains WHY these forms of antiart are promoted.
thegreatfearblog 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblog I will have a look at your video "The War Against Art"
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblog when you are looking at arts like this you should look at the massage it is tying to convey,not at how realistic it is because these styles were invented to convey complex massages and philosophical ideas that are hard to be conveyed trough realistic art
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thegreatfearblog "No. Art should be Beauty, not creativity!" ... wait... are you f**king kidding me?
Thumbs up if anyone thinks this person knows what he/she is talking about. 'Cause I'm baffled.
QuoGirl 1 year ago
@thegreatfearblog and you can't understand advanced physics so Einstein's work is crap too...hhmm?
ThePhantomBlacksmith 1 year ago