CopperCards - Do NOT PLEA

[mrmotofy]

What US Code lists a felony to using Emergency Lights, when there is no emergency? My searches have come up with nothing.

[gorgeousdzastr]

where is the video with Roger Weidner a former prosecutor turned good guy

[gorgeousdzastr]

So common law is the "constitutional law" of the state? not codes and statutes? When you call for a common law court hearing, the "codes and statutes" are null and void? I am looking into common law now, and will follow up tomorrow.

Thanks

[williamwagener]

@gorgeousdzastr YUP, well I watched your vid about CORP courts, and you are also correct, but ONLY because you "AGREE" to waive Common Law, and go into their Corp. Kangaroo Court, and neither the Judge, nor the Clerk, or any lawywer will WARN you. Unless you file motions in advance, and then "appear by special limited appearance" to answer the call to "a" court, and lock them in by their OATH of OFFICE, you have waived your right to what the 7th Amendment GUARANTEES you, READ the 7th Amdmt

[gorgeousdzastr]

@williamwagener so I file a motion for special appearance and conditional upon their oath of office being put on and for the record? son n law has jury trial on 13th Sept so I need as much information as I can get.

you can't just go in there and say "I am here making a limited special appearance, until the court informs me that this is a Common Law, Constitutional Court." & then stop talking, say nothing until the court judge says "yes this is a Common Law Constitutional Court?

[gorgeousdzastr]

I have asked a lot of people, So called Gurus in regards to a case against people on the sex offender registry they just avoid it all together. I have family on it for receiving a frigging picture! The SOR registrants are being forced into a contract against their consent. Nothing that is lawful under UCC and color of law violations against them. This has nothing to do with a sex crime, it has everything to do with violating 1st, 10th, 14th, due process, and a SLEW of other constitutional laws.

[irishslave51]

Fuck these malignant pieces of fuck. I hate authority, especially when they are all a bunch of faggot cocksuckers. It's all lies. If you start to threaten their power and position then the drama really begins. Go back and read about Cicero who was trying to be fair and equitable with the law, the emperors (most were fags) didn't like this and croaked him

[bsigel666]

This is silly. If you don't enter a plea, they just enter a not guilty plea for you and the show goes on.

[williamwagener]

@bsigel666 not always, if you "make special appearance" to answer "without granting jurisdiction" unless Judge agrees it is a

"Constitutional Common Law" court [ see Amendment #7 ], and if judge ignores that, you stand silent.

talking gives them juridiction after you have made that statement. then you appeal, with the verified certified copy of the court record. We know the Courts are Corrupt. No Question about. Key is knowing when to shut up. and file the right motions on appeal.

[LADORSEY]

@bsigel666 thats not true................i went to county court and told the judge i refuse to make a plea because i cannot get a fair trial. my court case was jsut transferred to state court.

[williamwagener]

@LADORSEY don't know what your case is about, but I suggest you watch my video with Roger Weidner a former prosecutor turned good guy. When you are called, state, I suggest, you state: "I am here making a limited special appearance, until the court informs me that this is a Common Law, Constitutional Court." & then stop talking, say nothing until the court judge says "yes this is a Common Law Constittutional Court". See what happens. Also helps if you have submitted motions in advance

[LADORSEY]

@williamwagener thanks for the advice. my next court date is on the 8th of september, i received a citation for speeding. how do i submit a motion in advance?

[TheMarcusMark]

@LADORSEY So, the only way, under trust law, for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary––us, and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles––from beneficiary to trustee and for them to switch their role––from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time. They must somehow trick us into accepting the role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit?

[williamwagener]

@LADORSEY Good Question. Remember the JUDGE is a [allegely] a neutral referee. The CLERK of the COURT is the TRUE AUTHORITY because the CLERK has oath to keep the records for appeal, not the judge. So... with that in mind, in a traffic ticket, you go to the window where they expect you to PAY the fine, for which you were coerced to sign a contract to "Appear" on. You APPEAR to the supervising Clerk, a week or two before thge "date" to appear in court. You give the CLERK one of several

[williamwagener]

@williamwagener - - - original copies of YOUR letter or Motion with case title, Ticket number and demand your 7th Amendment under Common Law OR demand CLERK and Judge DISMISS "with Prejudice" [with means they can not resurrect that case again]. They will likely send you a letter setting a Trial date. You make "a special appearance" until they acknowledge your right to JURY or admit they are in violation of OATH of OFFICE to UPHOLD the Constitution, with the 7th Amendment. got it?

[gorgeousdzastr]

@williamwagener I like this idea. However it is something I am not familiar with. What will it do to a traffic ticket in Common law court? Remove their jurisdiction?

[williamwagener]

@gorgeousdzastr Under COMMON LAW.... you have to have caused INJURY in order to be punished,

and unless you hit someone... with your "vehicle" you don't owe a fine, even if you ran the stop sign or

were speeding. AND your are entitled to a JURY, see 7th Amendment, if the fine is over $20.oo.

So... study Common Law, and don't let them GET jurisdiction in their Illegal Kangaroo Court , Appear by

special appearance, which you almost NEVER hear a lawyer speak.

[gorgeousdzastr]

@williamwagener One day I went to court, and I said "I am here appearing specially not generally.. and as I was speaking the judge started talking over me, telling me there wont be any of that crap here in my court room.. I didn't know what to do then.. rofl

I WANTED to tell him something like.. Well it aint your friking court room judge. but I know where that would have led.

I ended up with a contempt charge, but he dropped it, and I had to pay the ticket. so I did. I shut my mouth then.. lol

[gorgeousdzastr]

@gorgeousdzastr does it work for the same with the sex offender registry? There is no victim there either. Just a "force of law" that is actually IMHO a violation against the UN codes or something like that. I personally think that registry is a fluke. Just a way to extract money and hold control over someone. And shows how people can be led like a "MOB" to do anything by fear.

[t4705mb6]

As the US is a LEGALLY British owned CORPORATION under the agreements/acts signed in secrecy during the American "revolution", US courts are run under Her Royal Majesty's ADMIRALTY COURTS, law of the high seas. Being a SUBJECT to the CROWN, US CITIZENS will be identified by a bill of lading or "birthing certification" or receipt to the monarchy of your value. A gold fringe around the US flag will alert you as to when you are under British law.

BECOME A FREE MAN! Wake up.

[inad316]

the problem is, this WAS our rights. the constitution doesn't mean shit after the patriot act was put in place. whats coming next is going to get worst and worst. As some of the prophecies I have learned as a kid about America is that it will be destroyed from within and not from an external force. Sooner or later I am convinced there will be a Law that would state, "All other laws are void, you are a slave." STILL Keep on fighting but even if every1 woke up, i truly believe its too late.

[inad316]

cont...

if u don't believe me, look at how fast the corruption is spreading. since charles sprinkle case to now it has sky rocketed. If you sue a governor now and it hit the media you will be shut down instantly . I would love to believe we can change things but they are like a root of a tree, they have infiltrated our worlds so deep its impossible to remove every inch of them.

[williamwagener]

@inad316 Get over depression. Go See: "WilliamWagener, Grand Jury"

there lies soluti0n, if you have guts to use it.

[wind0wninja]

This ain't 2008 anymore. Pretty sure Clive spent about 6 months in jail to think about his mistakes since then.

[williamwagener]

@wind0wninja ONLY real mistake Clive made was to believe the American Justice system had any scintilla of Justice. I think he left the North American Continent, and was cruelling denied visitation with his own sons... when it was his wife who was the adulterer and got custody.... did you know that Wind0wninja?>

[wind0wninja]

@williamwagener Actually it was his belligerence to the State and refusal to recognize International treaties which supersede the whatever rights he thought he had. He was warned too and he refused to listen. He won't be the last either.

[006006006006]

This CLIVE guy got it right. He is a real man, among nation of mice.

[williamwagener]

@006006006006 AGREED. thanks for thoughtful comment, A "REAL MAN, among a nation of mice".

[Snakeeater436]

"This can be explained by the Fact US citizens are residents of Districts and territories not States where the Political power comes from."

.

BULLSHIT

[deathmarch5]

@Snakeeater436 And the 3rd constitution was after the reconstruction acts where the 14th amendment removed the whole original constitution and made it under federal control dishing out civil rights instead of human natural unalienable rights. That constitution is stark in comparison to the Original. we know it today as THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. A corporate charter. The proof is USC 28 3002 (15), also Brad and dunn street web page. so yeah reread the 14th amendment section 3 a oath

[deathmarch5]

@deathmarch5 also see this case law "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state. In re Merriam, 163 US 625." A Lower case state means a republic land mass where as State or STATE is a corporation or franchise of the corporate federal government. This is the horse crap the federal school system wants shoved down you thought. FDR made the corporation into a democracy with the passing of the new deal, a kissing cousin of communism.

[Snakeeater436]

@deathmarch5 "A corporate charter."

.

NO CORPORATE LICENSE NO CORPORATION

.

"The proof is USC 28 3002 (15),"

.

NOT PROOF OF ANYTHING.

[deathmarch5]

I would;d like to elaborate on why Police cannot sign a verified complaint. Its because of their Oath please see Title 8 section 1481 they have expatriated from their nationality. This can be explained by the Fact US citizens are residents of Districts and territories not States where the Political power comes from. They are mere residents (temporary for a purpose)of the State. 14th amendment has the clue section 3 took a new Oath different from the People.

[Wildrosestands]

I just asked the judge presiding over my misdemeanor traffic case, who she represented in that court? She replied that she represented herself / no one. She also read the arresting officer's affidavit aloud and in it she quoted me speaking about Maritime Law. I couldn't believe my ears! This, as she sat before two Maritime flags! The DA was unprepared, too.He didn't have my case there before him.

I also pointed out to her that I was not ELIZABETH BOOK, but that my name was Elizabeth Book.

[billybbob18]

Shoot! I entered a not guilty plea in court today. Can I still challenge jurisdiction on that case when I take the stand @ trial?

[Jaynagurl1]

My dad taught me that this is true...he had to go to court and represented himself because lawyers truly only serve the court. The state of Alaska tried to collect "owed money" from him for child support that he payed to my mother and he asked for proof of jurisdiction... they did not know what to do with him because he didn't play their game and doesn't have to. They occasionally send him more attempts to collect and he again asks for proof of jurisdiction with more long bouts of silence :P

[williamwagener]

@Jaynagurl1  THANKS for that IMPORTANT comment. Have you seen: "Arrest of George W. Bush, soon"

[Jaynagurl1]

@williamwagener Interesting, thanks :)

[Zeta0Hall]

@williamwagener Hmm .. I like how THAT sounds. I'm gonna check that out now ... Thanks  !

[Macedon51]

Fantastic! Thanks for the video!

[SpringChatty]

if u aint guilty, dont plea to anything at all. that makes the most sense.

[DaughterofEarthanSky]

This world has become all about money and nothing else. How can I make a buck. I have friends that have had this one pulled on them and believe me it's the money. Mr. Wagener you are doing a Great job..!

[williamwagener]

@DaughterofEarthanSky THANKs, share this with a few friends each day.

[wendybear666]

The Court OFFICIALS break the LAW...

[churchmn]

Excellent info here. Thanks, and 5*****s.

[robson1144]

Best bet is to decline the offer to ever go to the court-house in the 1st place -(unless you commit a crime - injury, loss or harm or breach of the peace -then you gotta be punished  for that crime) ................no average guy will ever win in the courts - its like dining with lions........the lion always eats last !!

We need more 'common-law' courts! And lets hang all the corrupt effers !!

[gazzahall2002]

@robson1144

Hey dude, you shoul check out this guy then. Speeding. Case dismissed. Very simple.

[mshope4us]

Have you un-covered anything to stop corrupt judges & SS workers from child kidnap , that is both rife in the USA & UK

[williamwagener]

1. Demand a Court ORDER based on a JURY VERDICT or resist with maximum FORCE to deter, and have a Militia of friends that will show up. 2. Start tracking the Kidnapers to their homes, and without attacking them let them quietlly know YOU know WHERE they live.

3. Have a member of your local Militia confront them , without you around, and ask them why they kidnap children without Lawful DUE PROCESS. SPECIAL GRAND JURY... READ IT IN YOUR ENGLISH Magna Carta

[BigFuckingWade]

You cannot "agree" to be prosecuted for a crime nor is a criminal prosecution contractual. Otherwise, no one would be held accountable for his or her criminal acts.

A plea of not guilty puts in issue every material allegation of the accusatory pleading, nothing more. (Cal Pen C § 1019.) And if a defendant refuses to answer the accusatory pleading, by demurrer or plea, a plea of not guilty must be entered. (Cal Pen C § 1024.)

[williamwagener]

and IF you enter any plea, y ou grant jurisdiction, when indeed they may not have JURISDICTION, because your intitled to a Constitutional Trial, not one of their Stat. in Kangaroo court... unless of c ourse you consent by entering any PLEA, without making a special appearance until they concede it is a Constitutional Court.

[BigFuckingWade]

Think youre entitled to a constitutional trial? Can you even prove the constitution applies to you? Are you a signatory to that document? Try using facts to establish that.

And its not possible to make a special appearance in a criminal proceeding.

It doesnt matter what court youre in; theyre all kangaroo courts.

[BigFuckingWade]

I dont know what type of jurisdiction youre describing, but subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent of the parties. In other words, jurisdiction of the subject matter in any proceeding is conferred by law, and cannot be given, enlarged or waived by the parties. (Cal. Jur. 3d, Courts, § 176, pp. 609-10.)

Where does the law confer jurisdiction by entering a pea?

[williamwagener]

thanks for your opinion. We do appreciate you citing

Cal Jur. 3d, - - however what won law gives you another law

often takes it away. And Stat. do NOT superceded Common Law, unless you consent to it in ignorance. otherwise the Constitution would be worthless, which is what most Judges and Lawyers want for us.

[BigFuckingWade]

I don't have an opinion. The cited material from CJ references the lawyers doing business as the "California supreme court," so it's their opinions.

I don't understand what you said after that.

The constitution is worthless because it's based on violence and organized coercion. And theres no evidence it applies to anyone. The men and women who do business as gov't are never going to do right by it. Note the CON in constitution. It's a public relations scheme to legitimize control over people.

[zo10]

HI, this video says what not to do (Do Not Enter A Plea) but what do we say OR DO when they ask HOW DO YOU PLEA?

If we stay quiet it is considered a tacit agreement right?

So what are we supposed to say when they ask HOW DO YOU PLEA?

[Rockin2Long]

First you will be asked if you "understand" the charges. The legal definition of understand is to make an greement, or a meeting of minds...

If you get to the plea part you already screwed up because you've admitted you understand the charges and think you were asked if yoiu comprehended them,,,

Pretty slick who wants to say "i don't understand" what a speeding ticket, etc, is!

So if u get to the pleading part u are already sunk!

[Rockin2Long]

so you say "no I do not understand." you will find that the court will attempt to proceed without your input....

You must object and restate your non-agreement to the charges. If you allow them to preoceed withoput objection the proceeding will stand.

By saying "I understand" you are agreeing to engage in a contract, and you are sunk. It is during this part of the duel that you need to establish lack of jurisdiction or standing.

[BigFuckingWade]

You do not need to ask for a verified complaint in a criminal action because the prosecution must provide it to the defense.

There's no requirement that a "citizen" or an injured party file a complaint, it need only be made and subscribed by some natural person and sworn to before some officer entitled to administer oaths. (Cal Pen C § 959.3.)

[BigFuckingWade]

The gov't does not break the law by arresting someone before trial without a grand jury indictment. A peace officer's authority extends to any place in the state as provided in Cal Pen C § 830.1. Specifically, a peace officer may arrest someone with or without a warrant as provided in § 836. Felonies can be prosecuted by information (§ 737) and misdemeanors and infractions by written complaint (§ 740). Thus, no indictment is necessary in most criminal actions.

[williamwagener]

TRUE, IF a Peace Officer witnesses a crime in progress, what Clive is talking about is Cops arresting on hear say, weeks later.

[BigFuckingWade]

Everything in this video is false.

[professorpunk1]

does this apply to all criminal offenses ???

[williamwagener]

YES, do NOT Plea - that give jurisdiction. Appear by "Special Appearance" and demurrer.

[BigFuckingWade]

You cannot make a special appearance and demur because submission of a demurrer constitutes a general appearance.

A defendant appears in an action when the defendant answers, demurs, files a notice of motion to strike, files a notice of motion to transfer pursuant to Section 396b, moves for reclassification pursuant to Section 403.040, gives the plaintiff written notice of appearance, or when an attorney gives notice of appearance for the defendant. (Cal Code Civ Proc § 1014. See also § 396b)

[BigFuckingWade]

You will note that a special appearance is provided for in section 418.10 of the Code of CIVIL Procedure and not provided for in the Penal Code.

The court will have in personam jurisdiction in a criminal action because the accused is in custody. And special appearances are not provided for in the criminal rules of court.

Again, you cite no authority in support of your assertions. Start reading the law and stop theorizing. Get youre facts straight.

[professorpunk1]

outstanding information

[nanciqwerty]

You can research Quasi Contracts to find out how those sneaky bastards have been enforcing Statute Laws on us for 200 years.

[bluetoga123]

AS far as Quasi Contracts there not Lawful because a real Contract has to be agreed upon two parties and far as a Statute thats not Law it is a corporate policy.Because when i go into these Quasi Court rooms i enforce the Judge to up hold his Contract which is the Constitution,that shit makes them mad as Hell.....

[worldwidebum]

Great Video!

[apsert]

YOUR HONOUR WHERE IN YOUR LAW DES IT SAY THESE LAWS ARE APPLICABLE TO MEN AND WOMEN,,,,,,

erh erh only people its atates.

Well if it does not say man women cat dog ect ,

Then it only applies to the legal "PERSON" your honour, Oh well you need to investigate the G.R.O department and search for the certificate of life birth where it will appear "DOC"-tor that saw the entity climb on board.

Oh and the Birth certificate, If it does not have my Signiture then i did not authorise it, ITS NOT ME!

[bluetoga123]

Sorry just by you saying your Honor thats giving jurisdiction,because in the original 13 amendment the Honor is unlawful,check it out peace.

[apsert]

@bluetoga123 Thats right but if you use the bible they run...

it says in the bible you shall not honour anything above me

you shall not bow to any symbil statuw emblem.

And what does the court hold, Coat of arms= symbol

your honour=judge

oath =ten commandments.

AND THATS IT!

BIBLE REFERENCE JEROMONY/ DEUTERONOMY - 42: DO NOT ADD ON TO THE WORD

I COMMAND YOU, NIETHER SHALL YOU DEMINISH ALL FROM IT

Now whos the criminals!!! im a man a child of God standing in Gods Kingdom.

[greywolf424]

"in the original 13 amendment the Honor is unlawful,"

NO IT ISN'T YOU FUCKING IDIOT.

Amendment XIII (1865)

Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[elysianfury]

@greywolf424 you gotta google something like "missing 13th amendment conspiracy" or something like that... supposedly if you go look at the real constitution you'll see this 13th amendment that is 'better' than the one you see when you look at any non-authentic copy. whatever, go check it out! real or not i find it very interesting

[williamwagener]

@greywolf424 GREYWolf - YOUR the IDIOT, the XIII (18 65) is not the Original which dates back before the War of 1812, which was the cause of the WAR.

[greywolf424]

@williamwagener BULLSHIT

[thered702]

@williamwagener just a thought, if a government employee cannot file a valid cause of action against you, then does that include u.s. citizens? just a thought, but they are not Citizens, right? citizen or Citizen to file a complaint?

[williamwagener]

@thered702 DON"T KNOW, I think if we do not get real representation, by

getting the ratio of 20,000 people to 1 State Assemblyman back soon it won

't make any difference. The Corporate government will just kill us openly claiming WE THE PEOPLE are "domestic terrorist" and the majority will buy the lie so they can sleep at night.... for yet a little while longer.

[deathmarch5]

@greywolf424 The history of the Original 13th amendment, was found by accident because of two researchers., in Maine. They stumbled upon the oldest book in the library low and behold the Constitution for the united States of America dated 1819 with the state seal on it verifying it to be authentic. A search in the Several states proved Wyoming was the newest state to have such a copy in a library with the Titles on nobility amendment 13.To view it go to us v. usa dot com web site.

[Snakeeater436]

@deathmarch5 "The history of the Original 13th amendment, was found by accident because of two researchers., in Maine. "

.

TOTAL HORSE SHIT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN VERIFIED BY ANYONE.

[deathmarch5]

@Snakeeater436 So what do you do for a living? May be this is hitting a nerve huh?No matter title 8 section 1481 says Persons who take an Oath foreign to a government has expatriated

[Snakeeater436]

@deathmarch5 ANOTHER LIE ASSHOLE.... IT SAYS..... "taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof". THAT MEANS SWEARING ALLEGIANCE TO A DIFFERENT COUNTRY OR POLITICAL PARTY IN A DIFFERENT COUNTRY.

[deathmarch5]

@Snakeeater436 yes it does:taking an oath, stop think oath to what or who? did you know there was 2 constitutions? actually 3 without counting the states constitutions. Just so you know Article 4 section 2 clause 1 was the Original intended Citizenship, of freemen known as the People. The Articles of the constitution we have today is part of the Original "Constitution for the united States of America" The bill of rights was separate The second constitution was the confederate constitution.

[deathmarch5]

@Snakeeater436 Now you know why I said what I said about Title8 1481 to admit you are a US citizen a federal citizen it expatriating out of the intended Citizenship you were born to. Besides that the Bar association is a British company located in the district of LONDON like DC its separate from the country England. City State. Hence a foreign state, as is DC(US corporation) foreign from the uSA.(several states) and State(New Jersey)

did I clear up for you?

[darrenpollard1st]

If a judge enters a plea on your behalf, they are merely making an offer. In which case I would refute the offer, for & on the record, & give him a counter offer:

'For and on the record, with the court and god as my wittness, the judge has accepted responcilibity for the charges, as only a defendent makes a plea.'

I've been trying to find judges Common Law & Statute regulations for entering pleas but nothing so far.

Ideas anyone?

[BigFuckingWade]

You're right on point. It's good to know there's at least one other level-headed person here. And they spammed your comment because it's damaging to their facade.

[HighlandFreePress]

Google "Freeman on the Land"

[mark191416]

It worked for me, this not entering a plea.

[kuriokazuki]

For a huge amount of detailed information, see Bill Thornton's side: 1215 org

Go to LAWNOTES and he has much material on how to establish courts of record (common law) and to make a counterclaim.

Ask the other party to procude proof of their claim that you stand under their jurisdiction - their private law.

Never plea and never enter "no contest". A counterclaim is necessary to reserve your unalienable common law rights.

See Bill Thornton's lectures on: 1215 org

[SadClownMovies]

only a man or women/human being can make a criminal complaint. A company or corporation cannot do that to human being am i right?

[LadyJustice666]

Thank you soooooooooo much

[StoneWallD]

yep, 4 x's in orange.

[peoplestandup]

Thanks you this was very good!!!!!

[HighlandFreePress]

Goole "Freeman on the Land"

[joe80dman]

This is why we must learn these technicalities. They never taught us these things in public school. We all must learn more, and to protect ourselves from this ever-expanding judicial tyranny.

[Jneil1976]

Great comment, joe80dman, I agree completely. Actually, one way or another, you or your lawyer/public defendant has to enter a plea at some time, whether it's the arraignment or not. Pleading 'Not Guilty' right off the bat is the best way to get a fair trial and/or conclusion. It puts the power in the defendant's hands and the onus on the judicial.

[kuriokazuki]

Pleading is contracting with them. It doesn't matter whether you please Guilty or Not Guilty, either way, you are voluntarily playing their game under their rules.

As I wrote earlier... Stating your name is the Signature for the Contract. Stating how you plead is the giving of the Subject Matter Jurisdiction and becomes part of the Consideration for the Contract. The arguments are the Offer for the Contract and the Judgment is the Acceptance for the Contract.

[Jneil1976]

I agree completely. You can opt to not plea. Whether, it's in your best interest depends on your innocence. If I am innocent, I will plead so. That's just me, though.

[CJC1295DAC]

@joe80dman I think you hit the nail on the head there. We need to know and understand how to use our rights. We are searched in Walmart for heaven's sake! We need to understand "implied consent" and "plainview evidence" and how, as shown in this video, that simply responding to something can make you party to a prosecution. There is too much to list here. Citizens need to be educated in order to arm themselves against the corruption *inherent* in the legal system. A system administered by robots

[FeloniousMonk1234]

unfortunately i copped a plea of guilty, but i have not been sentenced yet, and i am arraigned for reports into my previous good character to be carried out, before sentencing... is all lost...? can i not utilize my rights to refuse to contract still?? there doesn't seem to be much info out there to assist in criminal situations... wish i had come across your page some months ago the case has gone on for over 2yrs...

[joe80dman]

This is fascinating information. I need to learn, every citizen should, learn more about the law. I've always felt these modern day courts are acting way beyond their authority. Thanks for these great uploads.

[superpencil007]

this needs MORE VIEWs  and soon.

[kuriokazuki]

Stating your name is the Signature for the Contract. Stating how you plead is the giving of the Subject Matter Jurisdiction (you are voluntarily entering their jurisdiction by pleading) and becomes part of the Consideration for the Contract. The arguments are the Offer for the Contract and the Judgment is the Acceptance for the Contract.

Do not contract with them! Do not give your consent or voluntarily understand (stand under) them. - Be careful of the words you use. - Never "under-stand"!

[006006006006]

The Government NO LONGER REPRESENTS the people. Government does ARREST without a warrant. WE NEED 12,000 in State Assembly of Ca.

and  8,000 in Texas State Assembly, WE HAVE TAXATION without REPRESENTATION

[eddiedaskull]

ha ha high priest in the black nighty,an't that the truth

[poloniawarrior]

Yes, they arrested me and KIDNAPPED my only child. They held him for ransom until I was forced to plea under threat of never seeing my son again. A mother will do anything to try to protect her child. Unfortunately, the evil bastards LIED and, nine years later, I STILL have not seen my child! In America, "Anything" is possible, but that doesn't necessarily mean "anything" good!

[williamwagener]

@poloniawarrior  YUP

[earthicastar]

When i was taken into court from jail, in the orange jumpsuit with chains and a mask over my face, i did not plea, and was never asked for a plea, instead the commissioner entered a plea of not guilty, second time in court i was asked for a plea, i did not plea, third time i was asked again and i said if i am being forced to plea that my plea is "Double jeopardy" as i have already been punished for a crime i did not commit, he threatened contempt,i said i dont wish to be falsely imprisoned again

[earthicastar]

i was not held in contempt, instead the fake judge SUSPENDED the case for a competency hearing after HE already stated i was competent TWICE, i said i could not proceed without a COMPETENT court record, he said they dont have to have ANY record, when a case is suspended for competency, there is NO case until competency is established, so any motions i file, will not be heard either, William, go with me Nov. 14th, and all else who can be witnesses in Marin county, I sent my OWN doctor comp report

[williamwagener]

Do NOT Plead, and appear by Special Appearance, until judge

says, your in a Constitutional Court, so you can HOLD him to

his OATH which is to the U.S. Constitution, not the Court rules, policy, or CPS policies.