Added: 5 years ago
From: MarcoSchinelli
Views: 24,292
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • on the grand scheme, these areas are only small and cannot account for a 'recycling' of the new material forming at the oceanic rifts encircling the globe. They are like 'paper cuts' and they are not a good argument at all

  • where did you read that?

  • there's this good place to start called the internet

  • Please, don't be so helpful. Unfortunately u apparently don't know much about crustal recycling rates.

  • Just because I know it's all a load of shit doesn't mean i don't know about it. The Earth is growing at the oceanic rifts. subduction is a made up concept of the 60's. There is no proof. find me some and I'll eat crow.

  • proof of what? subduction?

  • nonsense

  • nonsense? enlighten me..

  • The expanding earth. Search the web and youtube. neal adams is a good authority on the subject. There is no mechanism or proof of subduction. there is none. none!

  • The existence of Wadati-Benioff zones, elongated regions of high seismic activity within the crust and mantle that are explained as huge shear zones. These zones are located beneath oceanic trenches and seem to indicate a slice of crustal material is moving downward through the mantle. They form one of the best arguments for subduction.

  • lol

  • WOW LOLZ indeed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more