I just downloaded the latest Catalyst Pack on Ati´s homepage. I have Catalyst A.I on so i dont think its related to crossfire...Hmm well i´ll try to overclock a little big more with stock cooler and see if its any difference.
I got, Cryengine 2 is one of the best optimised game-engines, the people who say that it isn't just can't run it and haven't seen the real graphics quality of Crysis.
But my CPU is (not really shit) but not as good as yours. I was irritated by that! How do u disabled that bottleneck? Oh hell, i am gettin` really courious about my new Sys comin` in 2 or 3 days... cant wait, wont wait, muahhhhhhhaaaaaa gettin` mad!!!
If your System runs that Game like this, than i should keep mine... It`s about a quarter of the Price of yours and runs min. 10 Frames better? What the hell is goin on?
It's called Devmode or something... it's in the Crysis benchmarks. You can somehow enable it in the game also but I personally don't know how to do that.
Do not believe people who claim that AMD Athlon X2 processors will not bottleneck even mid-range graphics cards. My AMD Athlon X2 at 2.80ghz bottlenecked my old 9600gt, but I thought the PC was graphics limited - so I upgraded to a GTX260 and guess what, framerates in Crysis are IDENTICAL, therefore proving that CPU is the bottleneck. Now I'm going to order a decent CPU at the least a Phenom II/Core i7.
dam dude i get like an average 25 fps and i got a amd 2.3 gigaherz brisbrane and a 9600 gt 512 mb on high with 8x AA. but i dont think it would run good in vista like yours does cuz vista slows shit down like a BITCH!
Intel's performance is higher out of the box and they don't even have to take maximum out of Core2-processors to beat AMD lineup. Then comes Nehalem..
Yep! In Crysis that's true. Though in games it's GPU that matters more. In software it's tough match between Q6600 and X4 9950 when both are at stock clocks. Though Q6600 consumes a lot less wattage to get there.
I hope that you are just bad flame bait..calling someone with names is weak and sign of not trusting one's own arguments.
11.1 i think it is I dont know if they have released any hotfix ill check it out
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - You may try older Catalyst versions, new ones are better for the new 6000 series and 5000 series.
arvutihull 1 year ago
I just downloaded the latest Catalyst Pack on Ati´s homepage. I have Catalyst A.I on so i dont think its related to crossfire...Hmm well i´ll try to overclock a little big more with stock cooler and see if its any difference.
woxer11 1 year ago
I dont even know if I have the best driver for 4870x2.. Had a lot of trouble with Ati drivers.
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - What kind of trouble you had? Maybe you don't have the right drivers installed and Crossfire isn't even working...
arvutihull 1 year ago
Im from Sweden so 200 to 400kr - 20 to 40£..
woxer11 1 year ago
Can you recommend any good/cheap cooler?
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - What price range?
arvutihull 1 year ago
@arvutihull Well 20-40£
woxer11 1 year ago
@arvutihull What are you using? 10.9a seems pretty good.
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - I'm using 10.5, 10.9 may be good also.
arvutihull 1 year ago
I need an i7 or just a new CPU cooler so I can OC to 3.8ghz?
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - Both would pretty much solve the problem. i7 would maybe get a couple of more FPS compared to Q9550@3.8GHz.
arvutihull 1 year ago
I have a 4870x2 with 11.1CCC drivers, Q9550@3.01 and 4gb ram and i only get like 20fps avarage
woxer11 1 year ago
@woxer11 - CPU is bottlenecking.
arvutihull 1 year ago
cpu bottlenecks are RARE, and there is no one here
STCodes 1 year ago
@STCodes - In this video the graphics card was bottlenecked by the CPU for sure.
arvutihull 1 year ago
@arvutihull oh sorry then, well im using an q6600 @3.2 ghz, and a 470 gtx gpu, any chance of a bottleneck there?
STCodes 1 year ago
@STCodes - A bit maybe, not much.
arvutihull 1 year ago
fake, lol. u didnt get that fps with 16xq, cryengine not so optimised.
t3hslowpoke 2 years ago
I got, Cryengine 2 is one of the best optimised game-engines, the people who say that it isn't just can't run it and haven't seen the real graphics quality of Crysis.
arvutihull 2 years ago
uso da.
t3hslowpoke 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my video mate, its with a pentium 4 16xqaa and i get like 25 fps
glazeddonet 2 years ago
But my CPU is (not really shit) but not as good as yours. I was irritated by that! How do u disabled that bottleneck? Oh hell, i am gettin` really courious about my new Sys comin` in 2 or 3 days... cant wait, wont wait, muahhhhhhhaaaaaa gettin` mad!!!
Markus30121973 2 years ago
I eliminated the bottleneck by buying a new and faster CPU (Core i7 920).
arvutihull 2 years ago
If your System runs that Game like this, than i should keep mine... It`s about a quarter of the Price of yours and runs min. 10 Frames better? What the hell is goin on?
Markus30121973 2 years ago
I had a huge CPU bottleneck when I did this video. I replaced my CPU and now it runs about twice as good.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Finally know how to : "r_DisplayInfo=1" type it on you level config (easy,medium .. ) Etc.
poleksafa 2 years ago
Ahh, ok thanks for help : )
poleksafa 2 years ago
But how like that on 0:27 ?
poleksafa 2 years ago
It's called Devmode or something... it's in the Crysis benchmarks. You can somehow enable it in the game also but I personally don't know how to do that.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Buu, how to check FPS :((?
poleksafa 2 years ago
Download fraps (just google it).
arvutihull 2 years ago
Do not believe people who claim that AMD Athlon X2 processors will not bottleneck even mid-range graphics cards. My AMD Athlon X2 at 2.80ghz bottlenecked my old 9600gt, but I thought the PC was graphics limited - so I upgraded to a GTX260 and guess what, framerates in Crysis are IDENTICAL, therefore proving that CPU is the bottleneck. Now I'm going to order a decent CPU at the least a Phenom II/Core i7.
CentricStorm 2 years ago
Nice! I just got a Core i7 920 3 weeks ago and it's awesome!
arvutihull 2 years ago
lies..u prob ran the game in power saving mode which runs with half its actual clock.
AznDuD333 2 years ago
No, CPU-Z showed the right clocks.
arvutihull 2 years ago
thats not what i meant...im talking abt the guy with the athlon...
AznDuD333 2 years ago
dam dude i get like an average 25 fps and i got a amd 2.3 gigaherz brisbrane and a 9600 gt 512 mb on high with 8x AA. but i dont think it would run good in vista like yours does cuz vista slows shit down like a BITCH!
ki11joy92 3 years ago
I want to get this card, how well do you think it would go with an AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000, 3GHz? Would i get good fps in same settings as you?
I get about 32fps in sli with 2 8800GTS 512 cards in 1680x1050 all very high, would it be much of an increase if i get this card?
please help i don't want to waste my money.
TheXBurningXDarkness 3 years ago
if you already have 8800 GTS SLi then going for 4870 X2 will not be worth it. Athlon 64 X2 6000+ will bottleneck 4870 X2 but not too much.
arvutihull 3 years ago
6000+ would bottleneck the 4870x2 like nothing youd ever seen
joshua12345676 2 years ago
your pc sounds like a vacuum
n11lc 3 years ago
yes, GPU fan was 60% during that test. My camera has bad audio quality and makes it sound a lot louder than it was too.
arvutihull 3 years ago
you said that the noise was caused by your second computer
slayerking1234 3 years ago
yes, mainly it was, it would have been much quieter if I had turned my second computer off.
arvutihull 3 years ago
What game setting are you playing on? Any AA or AF?
I just wanna know how the 4870 X2 performs on 1680x1050 with AA in this game cause I might buy one.
NaturalLife24 3 years ago
I'm usually playing Crysis with Very High, 1680x1050 and no AA (that's how I'm playing it on MP). FPS in MP is around 24-50, average 35 FPS.
arvutihull 3 years ago
nice but not to nice
SimonLANO 3 years ago
yup thats why far cry 2 is going to be epic! cant wait for that game
belIis 3 years ago
hahhahah,
i have never heard to much bullshit in my life.
soon as you put the post proceessing to very high it uses 4 threads
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
warhead should be multythreaded if i'm not wrong...?
arvutihull 3 years ago
the reson intel chips can e overclocked to much is becuase the process is outdated,
legacy is about 24 years old now.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
if you compare clocks they dont so why dont you just fuck off.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
AMD will catch up?
i think the idea of 4 cpu cores useing a 1600to 1800 mhz bus is a disgrace.
intel are outdated.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
Intel's performance is higher out of the box and they don't even have to take maximum out of Core2-processors to beat AMD lineup. Then comes Nehalem..
kimnice 3 years ago
yeah,
so a Q6600 @2.6ghz will get higher fps in crysis than a 9950 @2.6ghz
get a grip fag.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
Yep! In Crysis that's true. Though in games it's GPU that matters more. In software it's tough match between Q6600 and X4 9950 when both are at stock clocks. Though Q6600 consumes a lot less wattage to get there.
I hope that you are just bad flame bait..calling someone with names is weak and sign of not trusting one's own arguments.
kimnice 3 years ago
come back with some proper education.
this is no place for amateurs.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
Ok so that's "bad flame bait" then. Too hard to get provocated with you.
kimnice 3 years ago
make sense.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
kimnice is right.
If you look at 3dmark and gaming scores, Intel's quads beat AMDs at the same clock speeds.
HamishM150 3 years ago
Intel's 65nm quads are not beating AMD-s 65nm quads. 45nm Intel's are beating them of course.
arvutihull 3 years ago
nope.
if you lower your bus to 200.
you loose.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
yes, of course, but Phenom's arhitecture is not meant to work with 200mhz bus.
arvutihull 3 years ago
i think they should bump them upto 333mhz or 266mhz
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
but they don't have the same amount of cache, nor chipset size.
Performance isn't measured in frequency speed alone. And with that, AMD CPUs are realistically priced for their performance.
HostelEffect 3 years ago
Yeah, I know.
If I was on a tight budget I'd go with an AMD, I'm not trying to start any arguments or anything.
HamishM150 3 years ago
yes really,
4 individual threads will benefit more from a phenom than a intel quad.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
how does it feel to game with this quality
tricccple 3 years ago
picture quality is awesome, but gameplay is quite boring. I hope they fixed that thing in warhead.
arvutihull 3 years ago
nice vid 5/5! showem what amd can do =D
cxhaxor 3 years ago
Thanks!
arvutihull 3 years ago
can you do a video of this with fraps sometime.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
of course. You should see FPS with high quality in this video aswell.
arvutihull 3 years ago
phenom power.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago