They pick on russia for now being below thier limits due to economic changes. They pick on china for already being below thier targets given thier population size.
They dont mention the dozens of countries and EU that are using the treaty.
nooo... and lets not point out that the biggest emitter on the graph was the US...no lets just talk about the second biggest....
US has 1/4 the population of china and emit nearly double the pollution.
See thats all I wanted to know. It figures we are played as the 'villains'. I say as Americans we should own it and publicly tell the rest of the world to go fuck themselves. Not symbolically either, literally telling the rest of the world to Go Fuck Yourselves! Nobody who matters gives half a goddamn about this stupid treaty and we're not gonna pay for and be victimized by the weak and powerless chaff of the earth! You don't know me either so don't act like it.
Not all nations are cut out the same, trying to hold developing countries to the same standards would choke their economies. I hate how he talks about helping other countries as though it were a bad thing, not all nations are cut out the same. Expecting them to, right out of the blue, measure up to the standards of the more developed countries is ridiculous.
yeah, climate does change naturally but humans are adding to it! what happens to a small forest fire if you spray it with petrol??? if you really think were so insignificant to our environment then go to school and get educated, ur the dumb fuck! its small minded selfish ignorant idiots like you that have done this, at least as a species we should take responsibility! even your NASA are excepting it as fact! DUMB ASS
This video brings up another view ( which I consider very narrow and selfish ) of the other nations which haven't ratify Kyoto Protocol. I personally believe this is what is wrong with media since they try to convince whoever watches this that there's nothing to worry about climate change. Please if you do not know anything about climate change search for another resources of info because this is not a good video to watch !
this is a fukin joke wtf happen 2 the EV1 the fastest 100% all electric car made by gmc thats right north americian would have made gmc the most powerfull car company ever ,would've stop the need for bailout and would have gave more jobs 2 USA and canada but lol we getting riped off all the time the little guys gettin fucked by gov they don,t care jus wanna milk use slaves the new slave land where 45% of everything u make or earn goes to the banks, gov, preto, taxes, & componded intrest
@LyNtRuTh what's weird is a bunch of wings of termites all over the floor where i live, which never happened the 4 years here. from the door all the way to the parking lot its full of wings on the ground. how would man made weather change interact with mother nature such as migration?
what you think this is news for adults? Look at how the report talks to its audience. It talks to you like you were a five year old trying to keep you attention. The REAL news is supposed to be an non-politically slanted statement of the facts. This is garbage. I was saying.
There's no shortage of conventional energy sources, the amount of coal out there is absurd. I don't see the point in a massive changeover, it's dirt cheap and plentiful.
This is CNN, the liberal lovers' channel. Beck was on it for years!
Listen to the facts presented here in the Video (which is a couple of years old now) and learn instead of mindlessly attacking it.
Think for yourself, or the government will think for you... and rule us all with the agendas of the rich and powerful that own them, be they American or Foreign interests that would like to tear us down to their size.
This video is in such poor taste (and horribly annoying). They completely twist and manipulate facts into some ignorant 2 minute clip that doesn't come close to providing people with the truth. This video is completely discouraging.
So China has to reduce its emissions and the US Senate unaimously voted to sign any treaty reguardless of its standards? This video points out a lot of truths and good reasons not to sign it.
China does not have to reduce emissions because China houses 20% of the world population and it still has lower emissions than US (around 18% of total emissions). On the contrary US accounts for around 4.5% of world population and around 22% of world CO2 emissions. So if you would look at it in terms of per capita emissions, US per capita emission is about 5.5 times the per capita of China.. conti...
If you want to compare it with India, per capita emission in US is a whopping 16.6 times the per capita emission of India.. I hope you now understand why US has to reduce emission where as China and India are exempt..
I do not believe China or any nation should be allowed to open up new coal plants every week if other nations have to cut back regardless of the consequences. China is now the largest emitter of green house gases and is increasing rapidly. They care about getting wealthy then the enviroment as does the US thus neither nation is reducing emitions.
I totally agree with you about the coal plants. But the boom in the building of coal plants in China is a relatively recent phenomena. On the other hand, Kyoto protocol was designed for the period 1990-2010. I'm sure that China will be asked to control emission in the Post-Kyoto protocol. About your assertion that China is the largest emitter of green house gases, it is still debatable. But assuming you are right China's total emission cannot be much greater USA's total emission.. conti...
..conti.. This implies that the per capita emission in USA is still around 4.3 times the per capita emission in China.. China will have to build a lot more coal plants to reach the same level of per capita emission as the USA.. Also, USA has been adding to the green house gases for a far longer duration than China.. Accordingly the onus is on USA to reduce the emissions.. Moreover, as the global leader USA should take a bigger responsibility and a leadership role in reducing the emissions.. cont
I read an article llast summer before the olympics and it clearly showed that China surpassed the US. My point is that if we are all eventually supposed to get off of norenewable resources then why is
China allowed to invest drastically in them. It would then have to replace all the old powerplants and infrastrucutre. China's oil and coal demand have be steadily rising at alarming rates. Thus they are more dependent on them now and harder to break free and invest in renewable sources.
We have to get off of nonrenewable sources at some point in time. But that is the long term goal which can't be achieved in a couple of decades. Kyoto Protocol was a short term goal (1990-2010) in the right direction. As I mentioned before, the next version of the Kyoto Protocol should definitely include Chinese participation. The next conference is scheduled at Copenhagen in Dec of this year. Hopefully the G8+5 would reach some agreement on this session. .. conti..
..conti.. My point is that USA didn't agree to the short term goals of the Kyoto Protocol even though it was the largest polluter in terms of per capita emissions by a big margin. More over, around 85% of energy consumption in USA is from fossil fuels. In contrast, only 15% of energy consumption in France is from fossil fuels.. As a developed nation and a world leader shouldn't the USA do more for the environment. .. conti..
..conti.. Also as I mentioned before, even if China's oil and coal demand rises at this "alarming rate".. It will be several decades before it would even come close to the per capita oil and coal consumption here in the USA.. And the Kyoto Protocol is set to expire in 2012.. So what is the point of raising the blame on China all the time? BTW did you know that China is investing more on renewable sources than USA? Their reliance on coal is only temporary in order to fuel their growing economy.
I agree that we should get off fossil feuls and for once I agree with French policies. I am a strong supporter of nuclear which fuels 77% of the French power grid. And China is rapidly increasing its oil/coal demand thus it will make it harder for them to break off from it. I believe we should not have to spend massive amount on renewable energy if other nations that emit more than us are exempt. And China is investing more because they will need more than 4x the power that the US needs.
I'm glad that we agree on the fossil fuel point. I also agree that US shouldn't have to spend massive amount on renewable energy if other nations that emit more are exempt. But as I mentioned before, China's per capita emission is 4.3 times lower than USA. Of course eventually China would need 4x the power in US because their population is more than 4 times that of US. But as of now their per capita emission is much lower than US.
True their per capita is less but lets face it: If they arent given at least some restrictions to the rate of increase they will surpass the US in per capita. Although I'm not saying they can't import oil/coal but they can not be allowed to become extremely reliant on them.
So what kind of restrictions would you suggest, keeping in mind that China's per capita emission is atleast 4.3 times lower than USA. And what is your definition of "extremely reliant", do you think USA is extremely reliant on fossil fuels? If not, then China is very very far from being extremely reliant on fossil fuels.
Every day that per capita gets smaller and we all know it. I admit we are reliant on oil/coal and I advocate nuclear as an effective alternative. What I am saying is why are we restricting devoploped nations from using fossil fuels but allowing nations to develop using them and becoming like all other developing nations.
..conti.. instead of finding excuses by blaming developing countries like China and India who are still far behind in USA in terms of per capita emission.. Enough said by me, I would like to know what modification would you suggest to the Kyoto Protocol in order to include Chinese participation.. While writing your suggestion please bear in mind that the per capita emission in China is still around 4.3 times lower than USA.. I hope you appreciate the importance of per capita vs total emissions.
We live in a global market so goes American producing at the cost of providing to other nations and polluting more so if we should pay more but than we should help and/or give less. So it will even out one way or another sorry starving Africa. Cost of mass production and shipping equals you suffer before we do.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Beck's skewed version of things. The U.S. is the world's worst polluter and has been for 50 years. As they have caused most of the problem, they should bear the biggest portion of the cost for clean up. Of course Beck thinks global warming is a big liberal hoax. Just ask his panel of experts, all paid or tied to big oil.
Kyoto is a death treaty; they want to do a mass murding world wide "the final soultion" This is the real deal also the real id act is to mark up the people they wan to kill.
an ice portion a size of 25thausads of football field was separated from the ever frozen arctic . countries get unusual winter/heat/ draught/ etc during the last 5-6decades. isn't that enough reason to consider the possibility of something called "the global warmin"?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
global warming does exist,, anmd were adding to it, ill prove it right now.
k so, the earth takes in sunlight right? when it takes in light, it takes in the light and produces infrared heat. thats what heatsw the planet. gases like CO2 absorb heat and doant let it out, so basically, 100% heat comes in, 99% of the heat leaves, and the heat that stays adds up over time, and after about 10000, the earth's tilt changes and we get and ice age! thats basic science ofr the averaage american. atheism
as everyone here seems to talk about global warming, i for one belive it might exist, but it probly wont effect us. if you watch glenbeck, 90% of you are pobably chirstian so there is a good proablibity well all die by the time somthing happens. and nasa actually has evidence of global cooling!
dfhsdghadfgdhkijuihu you wanna know some facts do you?
Well out of all the countries in europe that signed the treaty only 1-3rd of them met there obligations & isnt it odd the USA which didnt signed the treaty actually lowered its emissions LoL
I bet you those U.N. idiots were holding hands under the table in excitement when the U.S. was there looking it over.Like a bunch of used car salesmen. Al Gore and Jimmie Carter should move to Europe Take that idiot More with em. "Sell crazy someplace else we are all stocked up here."
THAT WAS AWSOME! I just got done looking at other sites. I even went to Wikipedia to get info on this kyoto thing. I thought to myself this sounds like some sort of card game and betting. Only America looks like it gets dealt the worst hand. Does the rest of the world think we are that dumb.
That's the cool thing about Beck's stuff--you might hate his opinion, but at least he and his team does their research on the topics they cover before he opens his mouth.
Was this cartoon about whether or not global warming was right or not? No. It was about the failings of the Kyoto Treaty. If you wanna whine about how much we Americans suck, please go somewhere else.
Besides, that's a gross generalization. Don't assume that every American thinks global warming doesn't exist, please. We're just as wide and diverse as your country, with just as many differing viewpoints.
I can your from Sweden you are so removed from reality. Your people thought it was no big deal to take money from the jews. Do you realize you should be kissing our asses because you would be speaking German if it were not for us. Where were your peoples sensibilities in WW2? Oh you dont have any I get it you believe gw is man made I forgot
stfu, global warming is false.only stupid un educated people think global wamring is true. they have so many flaws in their theories it is is not even funny, this dumb kyoto was only invented in 1995, because the west refused to give the communists money to start a second cold war.
I find it funny that all the alarmist consider carbon dioxide "Pollution" now... so the most important element on the planet is a pollutant? a bit of a stretch in the very least..
It is absolutely true that the planet has been a lot more cool and a lot more hot before... but when calculating the temperature increase, it is clear that polution has increased and hurried the present warming to an never before seen extend... only scholars paid by companies disagrees in the present debate... its simply unscientific to deny that humans is causing the temperature increase
I cant believe you americans wont accept that you are ruining our planet....
1 american pollutes 10 times as much as a scandinavian
.... never mind convincing you.... wouldnt wont you to lose profit....
lets not forget the reason why you for instance have huge cars and need to call you league winners for world champions: you suffer from a small-dick complex
Global warming is a hoax. How the hell can you know whats gana happen in the future with <100 years of data? Guess what, the planet cools and warms on its own. Remember this thing called the ice age? Planet cooled alot, then it warmed alot. No cars, no industry. 0 Emmisions.On its own. Explain that. Thats whats happening now, planet is warming.
Why doesn't your country pay for the majority UN's operating costs or pay all these other countries to participate in a Kyoto agreement? Why should we sign something that is really just a wealth transfer from the US to some messed up third world dictatorships.
Of course it does. We just had one of the coldest winters in 60 years. China had one of the coldest winters in 100 years. Baghdad got snow amazingly. Yes global warming does exits. RIGHT!
Brilliant! if only al gore would stop worrying about selling movie tickets and take note of the truth. Kyoto is a powerful symbol yet a flawed system. It has made almost no difference to greenhouse gas emissions, an embarrassment for those who pretend it is the answer. Indeed, several Kyoto nations have fallen behind their projected targets.
They pick on russia for now being below thier limits due to economic changes. They pick on china for already being below thier targets given thier population size.
They dont mention the dozens of countries and EU that are using the treaty.
nooo... and lets not point out that the biggest emitter on the graph was the US...no lets just talk about the second biggest....
US has 1/4 the population of china and emit nearly double the pollution.
PresidentBust 1 month ago
See thats all I wanted to know. It figures we are played as the 'villains'. I say as Americans we should own it and publicly tell the rest of the world to go fuck themselves. Not symbolically either, literally telling the rest of the world to Go Fuck Yourselves! Nobody who matters gives half a goddamn about this stupid treaty and we're not gonna pay for and be victimized by the weak and powerless chaff of the earth! You don't know me either so don't act like it.
madashell1200 1 month ago
Canada has joined the USA and China and has backedout of the Kyoto deal.
starview1 1 month ago
gotta love america! HAHAHAHAHA!
mtr25ful 1 month ago
Russia never was a super power that was the Soviet Union! What else is a halve truth, in this video?
anthonyredstone 9 months ago
@anthonyredstone same shit different name.
TheSorr0w 1 month ago
Is this the same guy as this one?? watch?v=48rQXNFTCpI
DonnyThailand 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck you america
4ioj 1 year ago
this is racist...i hate political correctness but this is racist
willthack13 1 year ago
@willthack13 I sure am glad I have a BLACK cat, (Well he does have some white) that way I wont make anyone cry and call me a racist.
ExtremePeppers 9 months ago
and to think i used to live this stuff, not anymore...
KangaKucha 1 year ago
They're trying to give us clean air! Those Marxist bastards!
RadarKat73080 1 year ago
i hate Glenn!
Omar6890 1 year ago
wha happn wif de kytoo treaty IN A CPUPLE OF MINTUES
iChex 1 year ago
Not all nations are cut out the same, trying to hold developing countries to the same standards would choke their economies. I hate how he talks about helping other countries as though it were a bad thing, not all nations are cut out the same. Expecting them to, right out of the blue, measure up to the standards of the more developed countries is ridiculous.
Shalek 1 year ago
Woah, we gotta go for some global Socialism. Capitalism's gay.
cyanide444 1 year ago
capitalist swine
TheArzael 2 years ago
HAHA that is true and a good point. ALL nations should be held accountable to the SAME reduction of emissions.
Anything other is simply an attack on the first world from the third. (Not a real attack but you know what I mean) :)
dadecountyhustler305 2 years ago 2
yeah, climate does change naturally but humans are adding to it! what happens to a small forest fire if you spray it with petrol??? if you really think were so insignificant to our environment then go to school and get educated, ur the dumb fuck! its small minded selfish ignorant idiots like you that have done this, at least as a species we should take responsibility! even your NASA are excepting it as fact! DUMB ASS
joandwilliam 2 years ago
biggest bit of US propaganda bullshit I have ever seen
Gremie3005 2 years ago
haha propagda thats funny.
dadecountyhustler305 2 years ago
This video brings up another view ( which I consider very narrow and selfish ) of the other nations which haven't ratify Kyoto Protocol. I personally believe this is what is wrong with media since they try to convince whoever watches this that there's nothing to worry about climate change. Please if you do not know anything about climate change search for another resources of info because this is not a good video to watch !
mabe59 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a fukin joke wtf happen 2 the EV1 the fastest 100% all electric car made by gmc thats right north americian would have made gmc the most powerfull car company ever ,would've stop the need for bailout and would have gave more jobs 2 USA and canada but lol we getting riped off all the time the little guys gettin fucked by gov they don,t care jus wanna milk use slaves the new slave land where 45% of everything u make or earn goes to the banks, gov, preto, taxes, & componded intrest
scorpionsoulja 2 years ago
it shouldn't be referred to as the kyoto protocol bullshit. it should be called what it is, MAN MADE WEATHER CHANGE
nblazerr 2 years ago
you are a fool if you believe in man made climate change. the climates changes all the time. the glaciers didn't melt because of man made emissions.
WhiteChocolut 2 years ago
are you fucking dumb? does this clip not tell you anything?
nblazerr 2 years ago
u stupid fuck! there is no such thing as man made weather change. you are so god damn ignorant. The climate changes naturally u dum shit!
WhiteChocolut 2 years ago
Comment removed
nblazerr 2 years ago
u so dam dum nigga
WhiteChocolut 2 years ago
u fat
nblazerr 2 years ago
racist bastard
lovejacker2007 2 years ago
lol u stupit cunt i neva said anything racist.
WhiteChocolut 2 years ago
Try some research..YOU'RE WRONG! Military manipulates our weather through HAARP, HIPAS so don't call names when you're wearing them.(=
LyNtRuTh 2 years ago
no you are wrong. GLobal Warming is a scam u dum penis
WhiteChocolut 2 years ago
@LyNtRuTh what's weird is a bunch of wings of termites all over the floor where i live, which never happened the 4 years here. from the door all the way to the parking lot its full of wings on the ground. how would man made weather change interact with mother nature such as migration?
nblazerr 2 years ago
what you think this is news for adults? Look at how the report talks to its audience. It talks to you like you were a five year old trying to keep you attention. The REAL news is supposed to be an non-politically slanted statement of the facts. This is garbage. I was saying.
BuckyDnB 2 years ago
On top of that, I am from Canada, and don't worry about oil supplies from friendly nations, we definitely don't have any shortage.
quuaa1 2 years ago
There's no shortage of conventional energy sources, the amount of coal out there is absurd. I don't see the point in a massive changeover, it's dirt cheap and plentiful.
quuaa1 2 years ago
This is news for complete idiots and it shows
BuckyDnB 2 years ago
Comment removed
zombieiscool 2 years ago
This is CNN, the liberal lovers' channel. Beck was on it for years!
Listen to the facts presented here in the Video (which is a couple of years old now) and learn instead of mindlessly attacking it.
Think for yourself, or the government will think for you... and rule us all with the agendas of the rich and powerful that own them, be they American or Foreign interests that would like to tear us down to their size.
Get it yet?
garwoodv6 2 years ago
This video is in such poor taste (and horribly annoying). They completely twist and manipulate facts into some ignorant 2 minute clip that doesn't come close to providing people with the truth. This video is completely discouraging.
solongmaryann7 3 years ago
So China has to reduce its emissions and the US Senate unaimously voted to sign any treaty reguardless of its standards? This video points out a lot of truths and good reasons not to sign it.
USAScommando666 3 years ago
China does not have to reduce emissions because China houses 20% of the world population and it still has lower emissions than US (around 18% of total emissions). On the contrary US accounts for around 4.5% of world population and around 22% of world CO2 emissions. So if you would look at it in terms of per capita emissions, US per capita emission is about 5.5 times the per capita of China.. conti...
udaykc 3 years ago
If you want to compare it with India, per capita emission in US is a whopping 16.6 times the per capita emission of India.. I hope you now understand why US has to reduce emission where as China and India are exempt..
udaykc 3 years ago
I do not believe China or any nation should be allowed to open up new coal plants every week if other nations have to cut back regardless of the consequences. China is now the largest emitter of green house gases and is increasing rapidly. They care about getting wealthy then the enviroment as does the US thus neither nation is reducing emitions.
USAScommando666 3 years ago
I totally agree with you about the coal plants. But the boom in the building of coal plants in China is a relatively recent phenomena. On the other hand, Kyoto protocol was designed for the period 1990-2010. I'm sure that China will be asked to control emission in the Post-Kyoto protocol. About your assertion that China is the largest emitter of green house gases, it is still debatable. But assuming you are right China's total emission cannot be much greater USA's total emission.. conti...
udaykc 3 years ago
..conti.. This implies that the per capita emission in USA is still around 4.3 times the per capita emission in China.. China will have to build a lot more coal plants to reach the same level of per capita emission as the USA.. Also, USA has been adding to the green house gases for a far longer duration than China.. Accordingly the onus is on USA to reduce the emissions.. Moreover, as the global leader USA should take a bigger responsibility and a leadership role in reducing the emissions.. cont
udaykc 3 years ago
I read an article llast summer before the olympics and it clearly showed that China surpassed the US. My point is that if we are all eventually supposed to get off of norenewable resources then why is
China allowed to invest drastically in them. It would then have to replace all the old powerplants and infrastrucutre. China's oil and coal demand have be steadily rising at alarming rates. Thus they are more dependent on them now and harder to break free and invest in renewable sources.
USAScommando666 3 years ago 2
We have to get off of nonrenewable sources at some point in time. But that is the long term goal which can't be achieved in a couple of decades. Kyoto Protocol was a short term goal (1990-2010) in the right direction. As I mentioned before, the next version of the Kyoto Protocol should definitely include Chinese participation. The next conference is scheduled at Copenhagen in Dec of this year. Hopefully the G8+5 would reach some agreement on this session. .. conti..
udaykc 3 years ago
..conti.. My point is that USA didn't agree to the short term goals of the Kyoto Protocol even though it was the largest polluter in terms of per capita emissions by a big margin. More over, around 85% of energy consumption in USA is from fossil fuels. In contrast, only 15% of energy consumption in France is from fossil fuels.. As a developed nation and a world leader shouldn't the USA do more for the environment. .. conti..
udaykc 3 years ago
..conti.. Also as I mentioned before, even if China's oil and coal demand rises at this "alarming rate".. It will be several decades before it would even come close to the per capita oil and coal consumption here in the USA.. And the Kyoto Protocol is set to expire in 2012.. So what is the point of raising the blame on China all the time? BTW did you know that China is investing more on renewable sources than USA? Their reliance on coal is only temporary in order to fuel their growing economy.
udaykc 3 years ago
I agree that we should get off fossil feuls and for once I agree with French policies. I am a strong supporter of nuclear which fuels 77% of the French power grid. And China is rapidly increasing its oil/coal demand thus it will make it harder for them to break off from it. I believe we should not have to spend massive amount on renewable energy if other nations that emit more than us are exempt. And China is investing more because they will need more than 4x the power that the US needs.
USAScommando666 3 years ago 2
I'm glad that we agree on the fossil fuel point. I also agree that US shouldn't have to spend massive amount on renewable energy if other nations that emit more are exempt. But as I mentioned before, China's per capita emission is 4.3 times lower than USA. Of course eventually China would need 4x the power in US because their population is more than 4 times that of US. But as of now their per capita emission is much lower than US.
udaykc 3 years ago
True their per capita is less but lets face it: If they arent given at least some restrictions to the rate of increase they will surpass the US in per capita. Although I'm not saying they can't import oil/coal but they can not be allowed to become extremely reliant on them.
USAScommando666 3 years ago
So what kind of restrictions would you suggest, keeping in mind that China's per capita emission is atleast 4.3 times lower than USA. And what is your definition of "extremely reliant", do you think USA is extremely reliant on fossil fuels? If not, then China is very very far from being extremely reliant on fossil fuels.
udaykc 2 years ago
Every day that per capita gets smaller and we all know it. I admit we are reliant on oil/coal and I advocate nuclear as an effective alternative. What I am saying is why are we restricting devoploped nations from using fossil fuels but allowing nations to develop using them and becoming like all other developing nations.
USAScommando666 2 years ago
he didnt respond to that one did he ?
BRUCELEEonLSD 2 years ago
..conti.. instead of finding excuses by blaming developing countries like China and India who are still far behind in USA in terms of per capita emission.. Enough said by me, I would like to know what modification would you suggest to the Kyoto Protocol in order to include Chinese participation.. While writing your suggestion please bear in mind that the per capita emission in China is still around 4.3 times lower than USA.. I hope you appreciate the importance of per capita vs total emissions.
udaykc 3 years ago
Comment removed
udaykc 3 years ago
We live in a global market so goes American producing at the cost of providing to other nations and polluting more so if we should pay more but than we should help and/or give less. So it will even out one way or another sorry starving Africa. Cost of mass production and shipping equals you suffer before we do.
LokiScoutSniper 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Beck's skewed version of things. The U.S. is the world's worst polluter and has been for 50 years. As they have caused most of the problem, they should bear the biggest portion of the cost for clean up. Of course Beck thinks global warming is a big liberal hoax. Just ask his panel of experts, all paid or tied to big oil.
JohnPurvis 3 years ago
China is actually the largest carbon emitter now and look at the facts global warming is a hoax.
USAScommando666 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fucking america !!! Sign the traty you fuckers !!!
CapitanoGUC 3 years ago
Here is a more human, efficcient solution to global warming:
'S T O P B R E E D I N G'
Everything else is just an excuse to profit from the problem.
Lulafan 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA........funny but mostly factual
1GXG 3 years ago 6
Kyoto is a death treaty; they want to do a mass murding world wide "the final soultion" This is the real deal also the real id act is to mark up the people they wan to kill.
BNNYWVH 3 years ago
ignorants:
an ice portion a size of 25thausads of football field was separated from the ever frozen arctic . countries get unusual winter/heat/ draught/ etc during the last 5-6decades. isn't that enough reason to consider the possibility of something called "the global warmin"?
nazirdjon 3 years ago
It's NOT a japanese movie!!! :-(
Lash090909 3 years ago 2
Sounds like global socialism...
marcusmortensen7 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
global warming does exist,, anmd were adding to it, ill prove it right now.
k so, the earth takes in sunlight right? when it takes in light, it takes in the light and produces infrared heat. thats what heatsw the planet. gases like CO2 absorb heat and doant let it out, so basically, 100% heat comes in, 99% of the heat leaves, and the heat that stays adds up over time, and after about 10000, the earth's tilt changes and we get and ice age! thats basic science ofr the averaage american. atheism
guitarownRAWR 3 years ago
got a source for that?
the amount of CO2 goes up when ever the temperature goes up (I saw this on youtube I'll post it when I find it again)
dartman348 3 years ago 6
"The Great Global Warming Swindle", a British Documentary.
sodie77 3 years ago 2
as everyone here seems to talk about global warming, i for one belive it might exist, but it probly wont effect us. if you watch glenbeck, 90% of you are pobably chirstian so there is a good proablibity well all die by the time somthing happens. and nasa actually has evidence of global cooling!
MockStoneLLC 3 years ago
provide evidence about nasa's global cooling
nazirdjon 3 years ago
Glennbeck said so!
MockStoneLLC 3 years ago
traditionally cold regions get colder and hot regions get hotter, according to the GW Theory. maybe Glennbeck meant that cooling
nazirdjon 3 years ago
well they were in the ice cap so thats possible
MockStoneLLC 3 years ago
hahaha,wha' happen? that line is funny!
DarkerDzinn 3 years ago 2
global warming is false.... that i already knew.... and i got logical proof that can show everyone that i am right as well.
ultradumbass 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video is so stupid...american like...wrong information for the americans..AGAIN!!!FUCK U.S.A GOVERNAMENT AND THEYRE TV,YA BASTARDS!
dfhsdghadfgbhkijuihu 4 years ago
dfhsdghadfgdhkijuihu you wanna know some facts do you?
Well out of all the countries in europe that signed the treaty only 1-3rd of them met there obligations & isnt it odd the USA which didnt signed the treaty actually lowered its emissions LoL
MrHairyNutz 4 years ago
I bet you those U.N. idiots were holding hands under the table in excitement when the U.S. was there looking it over.Like a bunch of used car salesmen. Al Gore and Jimmie Carter should move to Europe Take that idiot More with em. "Sell crazy someplace else we are all stocked up here."
markeez23 4 years ago
THAT WAS AWSOME! I just got done looking at other sites. I even went to Wikipedia to get info on this kyoto thing. I thought to myself this sounds like some sort of card game and betting. Only America looks like it gets dealt the worst hand. Does the rest of the world think we are that dumb.
markeez23 4 years ago 2
That's the cool thing about Beck's stuff--you might hate his opinion, but at least he and his team does their research on the topics they cover before he opens his mouth.
jmc2k6 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't simply undestand how you americans can be so egoistic, you just wont realize that our planet is on the edge to be destroyed!!!!!!
nsb07005 4 years ago
Was this cartoon about whether or not global warming was right or not? No. It was about the failings of the Kyoto Treaty. If you wanna whine about how much we Americans suck, please go somewhere else.
Besides, that's a gross generalization. Don't assume that every American thinks global warming doesn't exist, please. We're just as wide and diverse as your country, with just as many differing viewpoints.
Taiyama2 4 years ago 4
global warming is false. anyone who does not believe me, talk to me on my private box and i will prove it.
ultradumbass 4 years ago
I can your from Sweden you are so removed from reality. Your people thought it was no big deal to take money from the jews. Do you realize you should be kissing our asses because you would be speaking German if it were not for us. Where were your peoples sensibilities in WW2? Oh you dont have any I get it you believe gw is man made I forgot
markeez23 4 years ago 2
stfu, global warming is false.only stupid un educated people think global wamring is true. they have so many flaws in their theories it is is not even funny, this dumb kyoto was only invented in 1995, because the west refused to give the communists money to start a second cold war.
ultradumbass 4 years ago
That must explain ur name lol
the06bug 3 years ago
bah that is a username. if anything. the only person we should literally take with this username is your mom.
ultradumbass 3 years ago
ur right, sorry
the06bug 3 years ago
U.N. projects suck. Great editoral thinking there, you're truly an intellectual of the ages. Cock.
thejobloshow 4 years ago
DONT YOU JUST LOVE CAPTIALISM!!!!
SoilderofChirst 4 years ago
Yes I do
eastwood613 4 years ago
I find it funny that all the alarmist consider carbon dioxide "Pollution" now... so the most important element on the planet is a pollutant? a bit of a stretch in the very least..
JuMBOGooCH 4 years ago
Funny these little facts don't come out when you are debating a liberal. Truth hurts (their arguments).
johnh926 4 years ago
It is absolutely true that the planet has been a lot more cool and a lot more hot before... but when calculating the temperature increase, it is clear that polution has increased and hurried the present warming to an never before seen extend... only scholars paid by companies disagrees in the present debate... its simply unscientific to deny that humans is causing the temperature increase
ScientificDiscussion 4 years ago
This is so sad.
I cant believe you americans wont accept that you are ruining our planet....
1 american pollutes 10 times as much as a scandinavian
.... never mind convincing you.... wouldnt wont you to lose profit....
lets not forget the reason why you for instance have huge cars and need to call you league winners for world champions: you suffer from a small-dick complex
bentsen 5 years ago
very true
yesiam111 4 years ago
Don't forget that Mars is melting too. Is it our fault also?
Mattster2k6 4 years ago 4
Global warming is a hoax. How the hell can you know whats gana happen in the future with <100 years of data? Guess what, the planet cools and warms on its own. Remember this thing called the ice age? Planet cooled alot, then it warmed alot. No cars, no industry. 0 Emmisions.On its own. Explain that. Thats whats happening now, planet is warming.
girzwald 4 years ago 2
Why doesn't your country pay for the majority UN's operating costs or pay all these other countries to participate in a Kyoto agreement? Why should we sign something that is really just a wealth transfer from the US to some messed up third world dictatorships.
torkmonsteryahoo 4 years ago 8
quiet you....global warming does not exist...bentsen....
ultradumbass 4 years ago
Of course it does. We just had one of the coldest winters in 60 years. China had one of the coldest winters in 100 years. Baghdad got snow amazingly. Yes global warming does exits. RIGHT!
durco01 3 years ago 2
so we had one of the coldest winters and you still think we are getting global warming? lol looser!
ultradumbass 3 years ago
Brilliant! if only al gore would stop worrying about selling movie tickets and take note of the truth. Kyoto is a powerful symbol yet a flawed system. It has made almost no difference to greenhouse gas emissions, an embarrassment for those who pretend it is the answer. Indeed, several Kyoto nations have fallen behind their projected targets.
pineappleboy1 5 years ago
that's a red herring---what the fuck does their failure have to do with the damages of gas emissions?
hanumizzle 5 years ago
Thanks for uploading this! This was amazing.
TheNanoOne 5 years ago
Glenn Beck rules.
clashwho 5 years ago
Fantastic as usual. Great jog age
payallin 5 years ago