Added: 2 years ago
From: ForaTv
Views: 849
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • she reminds me of joe the plumber

  • microsoft success is driven by the fact that they were early. they are not innovative in any way anymore, their current success solely depends on suppressing competition

  • Constant learning=

    Constant theft of competitors intellectual property.

    Constant monopolistic tactics.

    Constant insistence on proprietary technology and closed and centralized standards.

  • It was all about constant learning;

    not about cornering the market by driving out the small business or making monopolistic deals with the good majority of hardware companies~

    no, it couldn't have been that!

    or how about "borrowing" technology from businesses big & small, or Gates pushing for 'free trade' agreements around the globe?

    Nah, his success is all just driven by 'constant learning'.

    heh.

  • Microsoft Success Driven by forcing corporations as well individual users to use their products. Tho I have to say, since sp3 I am happy user of Windows XP who's not going to upgrade to Vista or Windows 7

  • If the purpose of philanthropy is to "help" people by "providing [indoctrinating] people with a way of thinking and being that allows [requires] them to be open and receptive to constant learning [struggling to keep up with what the system wants them to do]" then IMO that sort of philanthropy should be outlawed.

  • by constant learning must mean constantly stealing ideaes and tech from other companies

  • i was expecting a comment EXACTLY like that :D and for good reason.

  • @nadadreamer haha true but i bet you own a 360...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more