911 Eyewitness - Pyroclastic Flow was a telltale sign of con

[anglocowboy]

"These phenomenon are typically visible only during volcanic eruptions."

Fixed.

[billyguns2]

Don'tyou people understand that Americans are too apathetic, stupid, or scared to do anything about this or any of the lying, thieving, murderous atrocities visited daily upon us by the fascist regime in power; they are LAUGHING at us, and any troublemakers will soon be liquidated or put in camps. The 'savior' is in the White House, already worshipped by a large segment of the population. Soon we will see African-American and Mexican armies holding white people at gunpoint,.

[bowhunter857]

@billyguns2

you are a fucking idiot. white people take care of blacks people and mexicans. Mexicans are sucking our country dry and black people are just here not doing anything like always.

[FSMLosst]

Pyroclastic flows? Massive explosions during controlled demolitions?

Smoke a few more crystals, dude!

[SkepticalAaron]

LOL. Utter fail. Pyroclastic flows travel at almost 500mph and hot means 3000 degress hot. Nothing about the cloud shape is an identifier of PF,that's just made up. If it was a PF then everyone caught up in it would have been killed instantly and everything would have been utterly destroyed and melted. People survived the collapse of the buildings,so its not even close to being anything that would be defined as PF. What you see in the video is an air burst,like what happens in land slides.

[cadetgj]

@SkepticalAaron Not to mention the fact that the bodies would not have only been burned, but the sheer force of a PF would probably shear your skin away and shatter your bones, and the temperatures would actually sear the inside of your throat and lungs. Plus it would've wiped out every single building around it for at least a few miles. The idea that there was a PF during 9-11 shows a profound lack of basic Earth Science knowledge, or the desire to see something that was never there.

[rushhalftheworld]

for all that happend that day have a little respect.. dont fight over this

[rushhalftheworld]

Hundreds of people died that day, i think its disrespectful to think anyotherwise, there was no explosion, when the planes hit they weakend the top of the buildings structure enabling it to fall, the top fell i really dont think the weakend buildings could really hold up the hundreds of tons falling on top of it. the scorched cars, anything can do that hell when u shoot cars they blow up and burn

[dajokn19]

To mimic a pyroclastic flow through something man made you would need a nuclear explosion, I don't think this qualifies.

[bellahowly]

fail.

[miko1975guitar]

Pyroclastic flows occur only due to volcanic eruption, and have nothing to do with buildings falling down. This is yet again another video tailored to create conspiracy without evidence

[Mike32587]

If this were a pyroclastic flow, wouldn't all of the buildings around the WTC been reduced to rubble? Most of the buildings, aside from those in ground zero, were relatively undamaged.

[bodtorent]

Pyroclastic flow?? P flows are 1000 Celsius degrees hot and they are composed of dioxide, monoxied and more... And they can travel up to 200 kms before it consumes. Come on.

[turbodude555]

/watch?v=StrSdfdjgUE

[truebluestar]

@turbodude555 The trailer looks good. Let me know when you finish the video.

[katlovesall]

To watch someone living through the flow from a volcano search on utube. . Dave Crockett: escaping from the 1980 St. Helens eruption. The ash from the volcano like the dust from the twin towers .. has cooled as it leaves the soarce of the explosion, people were pushed from violently from blast. Anyone close enough to the source, and not protected from its blast would of coarse be burned or suffocate..

[katlovesall]

A plane hitting the top of a building does not burn cars at the base. A plane at the top of a building does not make all 100s of floors below it fail in under 15 seconds even though they were not even in the heat of the fire. If it were a natural collapse then you would see FLOORS piled up on one another and you don't so you choose to ignore the visual evidence.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall

"A plane hitting the top of a building does not burn cars at the base" no, but the flaming debris that falls onto cars on the ground does. again, I'm pretty sure you know little to nothing about the WTC towers and the street level beneath them. lots of cars since the underground parking was closed after the 1st terrorist attack.

impact of plane + damage from explosion + fire led to the collapse. cherrypicking to make a point is lame.

I saw floors on one another with my own eyes.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 So far every one of you guys I have talked to says " you were there" you must use that to convince people like your a witness to it all, yet you disregard the testimony of the firefighters that are PROVEN to be there, and are witnesses to the real thing. Im sure you know little or nothing as well as to what happened that day. If you saw it too bad you didnt take a picture of it befoe it turned into a pile of mangled metal and dust. Then you would really have proof.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "yet you disregard the testimony of the firefighters that are PROVEN to be there"

by that you mean the firefighters who said it sounded like bombs and truthers have convinced themselves it really means they are saying it was bombs. OTOH there are 35 firefighter quotes about the huge fires and severe damage to WTC7 that truthers routinely IGNORE. "a pile of mangled metal and dust" like I said, truthers see what they want to see. metal and dust? how ridiculous you people are.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 yes hundreds of people said there were bombs, firefighters, office workers, janitors, venders, pedestrians, stip trying to twist what they are saying into something it is not, grow up and face reality. The firemen that were saying seven was coming down were just parroting what they were told was going to happen since they didn't want to go into a building like there other 240 comrades had just done and died for what?? the likes of you? :(((

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "hundreds of people said there were bombs" wrong. lots of people said they heard what sounded like bombs. there is a difference, whether truthers like it or not.

"The firemen that were saying seven was coming down were just parroting..."

disgraceful. you know what they REALLY meant, huh? another truthtard trait, divining the ACTUAL meaning of people who say something other than what truthers wished they said. pathetic. show me ONE fireman quote who said there was a bomb. one.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 There were hundreds of people, and I think a fireworker knows a bomb from someones thurmos blowing up in an office fire. Look at the start of the video of THE ULTIMATE CON , you dont think that is a bomb going off? The firemen even say bulidng sevens about to come down. Its all on tape.. there was forknowledge of the fact. Why do you dismiss that this time it was not a bomb when the building had been bombed in the past? why is this time differant?

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "There were hundreds of people" it's a simple request. show me ONE firefighter saying there was a bomb. YOU said firefighters said there was a bomb. I am asking for one quote. now you're talking about "100s of people" and asking me to watch something and decide if it is a bomb. why are you backing down? you made the statement. I called it bullshit. prove me wrong.

and yes, they were saying 7 was coming down for hours. so were they in on it or not? tard leader bermas said they were.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 Yes building seven, hmm anyone that has been out in the real world, knows that buildings dont just fall all at once like that unless it Is planned.After discussing how many lives had been lost, ( terrible loss) and how to prevent more from dieing (since they KNEW) the building was coming down, they sent out the word to stay out of 7..not 5 or 4 but 7, BECAUSE THEY KNEW! So of coarse any one on the scene would agree and I would too if I was in their shoes

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 Well in the photos of the aftermath you dont see a stack of floors or anything that resembles a natural collapse. So I think your the one seeing what they want to see, not me. How do you explain where all 110 floors of concrete, marble, steel glass went? If each floor was two feet thick with concrete and steel then there should be a HUGE pile of debrie, which there was not. You really think the aftermath looks like a collapse? Stop watching cartoons.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 To be honest with you Im tired of talking to you guys with your "parrot back routine" and going through the long list of scripted answers, that you cannot deviate from. I see no fire as the towers are coming down, and well sounds like your mind is made up and so is mine as to what is going on, so this is a waste of time.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall - "To be honest with you..." for once? ha! not likely. "I see no fire as the towers are coming down" - are you really that dense? not only are you wrong about what you thought I meant, you're wrong about what I actually meant. I was talking about flaming debris that hit the ground when the planes hit. like most truthers, you see what you want to see. and I was at GZ in Oct '01. whine all you like.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 Your very insulting to talk with, your responses are full of insults and lack facts. How much diebrie did you see come out of the building and hit the ground after the planes hit? Not enough to singe the paint off of hundreds of cars and blast them one on top of each other. Plus a piece of debrie hitting a car would put a huge dent in it, some of the cars were singed yet not damaged in a way that showed something had hit it at all.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "How much diebrie did you see come out of the building and hit the ground after the planes hit? Not enough to singe the paint off of hundreds of cars and blast them one on top of each other." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

talk out your ass much?

"some of the cars were singed yet not damaged in a way that showed something had hit it at all." - so you expect all the damage would be the same, huh? seriously, are you retarded?

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 YOU said that the damage was caused from falling debrie, and I said that it did not show that, since many of the cars had their paint singed off and some of them had actually been blown over onto their sides and on top of one another. This indicates a percussion of great force and heat had occurred. Not explained in your simple conjecture of what had occurred.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall I can see you're struggling, so let me walk you through it. when the airplanes hit the building, flaming debris that hit the ground caused some of the cars to ignite and burn. when the buildings collapsed, more flaming debris made more cars ignite and burn. it's really not that complicated. however, when you wonder why cars on the ground were on their sides and assume a percussive explosion nearby, you jump way too for to that conclusion. look up occam's razor. it'll help.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 Naw I think your the one in fantasy land, not me. There were no reports on the news of cars burning up by the hundreds or turned on their sides.. at street level BEFORE the collapse. oh what a web we wieve when we practice to decieve.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "There were no reports on the news of cars burning up by the hundreds or turned on their sides"

none that you saw. and that's the be-all, end-all, right? what a joke.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall regarding cars on their side, which is more likely to you?

scenario 1: a burning car ignited from flaming debris falling to the ground after an airplane hit a skyscraper eventually explodes, turning it on its side.

scenario 2: an enormous conspiracy that needs 100s--if not 1000s--of people to keep quiet about sends remote controlled airplanes into skyscrapers but fakes the other two plane crashes and makes it look like saudis attacked us so we'd go to war with iraq.

do the math.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 It does not take hundreds to accomplish. People just do their jobs and many fall into the plan without realizing they are even involved.. they just do what they are expected to do. Most take orders from the top. Its when they do something illegal that they should speak up but they fear loosing their jobs or worse, and so until time passes and those fears are gone they will not speak out. This is how hitler came to power.. everyone just said im taking orders

[katlovesall]

The cars at the base of the towers were burned, and the pulverized concrete did not happen from a simple gravity collapse. Clearly there was an energy force that caused these things and only morons choose to ignore these things or explain them away, like they a natural occorance in a building collapse. NOT

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall - there is video footage from inside the dust cloud that resulted from the collapse. if this was a pycroclastic flow, the videographer would be dead and his camera would be ash. only a moron would choose to ignore these things.

and why is pulverized concrete considered suspicious by truthers? do you people really expect none of the concrete to be crushed? or do you really believe that ALL of it was?

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 Your explanation fails to iclude how the cars were singed. this was a smaller scale than a volcano, of coarse.. duhhh. MICROSCOPIC debrie, not crushed. crushed concrete does not float around the city on a dust cloud. Plus many people survived Mt St Helens dust cloud, so you don't know what the hell your talking about . go back to hell 666

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall - two huge jets hit two huge skyscrapers...and you'e confused why some of the cars on the ground were burning? are you serious?

I didn't ask about the size of the debris or dust. what is it that is suspicious about some (unless you think it is all?) of the concrete turning to a fine dust? but if you think all of it turned to dust, do tell.

yes, many survived mt st helens dust cloud, not the pyroclastic cloud. two different things.

[katlovesall]

@unclesamsnephew666 No obviously the crushed concrete was at the base of the towers, what little there was of it. The cars, hundreds of them were blasted or singed, by hight heat. I know you didnt ask me about the size of the dust, but I told you anyways, since you want to overlook that fact that is was microscopic. The flow from St. Helens went right on top of some loggers and they lived, a camera man too. He got films as it was happening.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@katlovesall "what little there was of it" something tells me you didnt see ground zero in person within a few weeks of 9/11. I did. there was a lot of concrete.

the cars were on fire from debris coming down from the 2 airplanes hitting the buildings.

what is it about microscopic that is suspicious?

whatever you are talking about regarding a dust cloud and people living through it is not pyroclastic flow.

[jschob]

"The cauliflower shape is a tell tale sign of pyroclastic flows."

Yes, almost every pyroclastic flow has a cauliflower cloud, but not every cauliflower cloud means it's a pyroclastic flow.

Millions of pounds of crushed concrete obviously spread condensed air with ash/debree through the city. Having no room to disperse due to the high rise buildings, the clouds were able to stay condensed for a longer time.

Interesting? Yes. Evidence of a controlled demolition? None whatsoever.

[hostesaft83]

the clouds were hot... but cooled down fast. just looks at the toasted cars parked nearby. they where not crushed by falling debree... just toasted.

[acedenach]

The only thing it's a telltale sign of is the destruction of a building. The couliflower-shaped debris would be the result of the destruction of any building, controlled or not, because of the way the particles move through the air after breaking apart and hitting the ground. It has nothing to do with the nature of the destruction of the building.

[oegromov]

The pyroclastic flowed burned a lot of cars parked at manhattan at 9/11.

Some of the cars de aluminium engine was melted.

The temp. was high enough due to the nanothermite

[gww1]

Pyroclastic flows are heavier than air. These clouds are floating up into the air.

[packets1]

If they had been pyroclastic flows, everyone and everything in Manhattan would have been baked baked to a crisp.

[kevin604bc]

Also everything in the towers from computers, electronics, tables, chairs, office supplies etc were mysteriously vaporized. According to firefighter reports the only thing they found was half a piece of a mousepad.

[GodlessMartyr666]

@kevin604bc a pyroclastic flow can melt silicon pretty easy, it would become part of the flow and literally equates to nothihng but pure dust. This is plausible if the flow was hot enough.

[Denierbud11]

A pyroclastic flow will destroy nearly everything in its path. With rock fragments ranging in size from ash to boulders traveling across the ground at speeds typically greater than 80 km per hour, pyroclastic flows knock down, shatter, bury or carry away nearly all objects and structures in their way. The extreme temperatures of rocks and gas inside pyroclastic flows, generally between 200C and 700C, can cause combustible material to burn, especially petroleum products, wood, and houses.

[Redward652]

The temperature was too low for it to be pyroclastic flow. Pyroclastic flow reaches over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the people covered in ash by the collapse were obviously not baked to death, because they were talking and running and paniccing.

Controlled demos don't even have pyroclastic flow. Only volcanic eruptions have it.

[kevin604bc]

You can clearly see the groubd hugging pyroclactic flows. A pancaking building building does not create cauliflower clouds flowing through out the streets.

[Asteris000]

Pyroclastic flows are volcanic in nature. Though what you see may look like a pyroclastic flow, it is not.

[Denierbud11]

Pyroclastic flows are high-density mixtures of hot, dry rock fragments and hot gases that move away from the vent that erupted them at high speeds. They may result from the explosive eruption of molten or solid rock fragments, or both.

They do NOT come from controlled demolitions.

[mapdark]

Pyroclastic flow was not present on 9/11 .. The dust was not exactly ground hugging gasses!

[Redward652]

I agree. Not only that, but people caught in the gasses weren't baked alive. A pyroclastic flow reaches in excess of 800 degrees Fahrenheit, enough to make your head literally explode.

[mapdark]

Exactly!

There were businesses where people ran to for safety that had their facvade covered nin dust .. and as far as I know they have not been baked up!

[Asteris000]

ACTUAL definition from USGS: "A pyroclastic flow is a ground-hugging avalanche of hot ash, pumice, rock fragments, and volcanic gas that rushes down the side of a volcano as fast as 100 km/hour or more. The temperature within a pyroclastic flow may be greater than 500° C, sufficient to burn and carbonize wood. Once deposited, the ash, pumice, and rock fragments may deform (flatten) and weld together because of the intense heat and the weight of the overlying material."

[coppelia2000]

I can understand the correlations that are being drawn between volcanic pyroclastic flows and the debris clouds from 9/11 but really...c'mon...

This is just another example of the americans O-B-S-E-S-S-I-N-G about a disaster that happened to them SEVEN years ago, and even though 3,000 people died from this unfortunate disaster, many many other disasters have occured since then, and they are not getting half the attention that 9/11 did. Example: Indonesian tsunamic -- 225,000 people dead

[ClunkityClunk4Truth]

"Indonesian tsunamic -- 225,000 people dead"

Are you serious?

[TheFlygt]

Yes. But seeing as the tsunami didn't happen in the US OF A!!, there's no need to worry.

Unfortunately, I don't live in AMERICA, THE LAND OF THE FREE!!!, so I kinda have to watch news about the rest of the world. So while I have to watch the quakes in China rage on, with the official death toll now into 32000 and the 220000 wounded, you Great Americans get to view Fox! I.E. the new Lexus! It parks for you! How great is that!

Pft

[ClunkityClunk4Truth]

The idea that the U.S. media did not pay attention to the tsunami is so ridiculous I have to what your motivation is for claiming such a thing.

[TheFlygt]

Your amount of input is shocking.

[ClunkityClunk4Truth]

Hard-hitting analysis.

[screamingdingo]

hard hitting bullshit.

[slidehazard]

WHAT was the point of this video???

[Fibroman50]

Him and his cronies yes they did see "new american century" and yes i did not capitalze it because I do not respect it

[Binfordmachine]

bush did it

[monsterstinker]

yes he did.