Added: 5 years ago
From: Sissco
Views: 1,162,912
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,018)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE PEOPLE HERE TALKIN ABOUT?

    HOW IS THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    oh great

    good player or somethin like that

    and dont tell me he is playing not the right one or .......

    you what i mean!!!!!!!

    ENJOY THE MUSIC

  • i can play the really fast part before the sfffff faster than he does! He probably could play it a lot faster though great piece and great player!

  • guy in bottom right is dracula !!!

  • @MsNewBeatle My music also says tempo i but we ignore it

  • Yes, I agree with you. Still, amazing masterpiece.

  • I'd like to know your opinion - me and my teacher kind of argue about the last part - the sheet actually says "Tempo I" and she's telling me to play this part as slow as the beginning, but I can't agree with her, it just should be played faster, don't you think? And many many versions of this on youtube, including this one, are played with bigger speed in the end. What do you think?

  • @MsNewBeatle Nope.

    The only thing that gets bigger is the scale of your dynamics, and the size of your chords. Which means in those triplets, the second chord is still the loudest, just you're playing on the scale of fff, instead of p or mf. Keep up to tempo, there's a reason it's called a recapitulation of the theme and not a speed race. Another thing~

    Your teacher is your teacher so you can learn, do everything she says, or you won't learn correctly. Trust me on this one.

  • Comment removed

  • God damn he is drenched in sweat. :B

  • This is the best i ever heard it played. Perfect.

  • I know he's giving it his all, but he does play the vocal note's to hard like he was a buzzed from drinking a glass of vodka before the performance. I hope this is not an example of his best effort.

  • Fabulous! Funny statement, too!

  • Just Great :)

  • this piece is serene, pure madness, then serene again. a beautiful interpretation of this piece.

  • go to 0:10 and then to 4:00. pay close attention. did you find the difference.

  • @CookedPantz Great note

    wonderful !

  • Fantastic performance the passion is definitely there. Beatiful to the ears and soul

  • amazing piece

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz the middle sounds a bit hard. But its probably a little above my level. I'm doing 7th grade in a few months btw

  • That guy in the corner looks like either a vampire or the godfather.

  • That is on the best interpretations of the piece

  • And I feel sorry for his hairdresser

  • Terrible sound quality :/

  • what would the difficulty of this song be on a scale of 1 to 10 can sombedy inbox me? BTW great peice love it!!!!

    

  • @bluesboy18 By hearing it you would think that it isn't technically difficult, but keep in mind that it is in c sharp minor, and I hate reading double sharps LOL. but in all seriousness, if you can learn to read the chords you will be fine. then you have to play with emotion! I guess it's a 7

  • Love this piece :)

  • @MrSupsupguy lol u just gave him attention by replyig

  • I'm melting as I listen to this--this is such pure, such liquid genius, distilled from the presses of God. Praise God for his blessing us with such talent as Rach and Gilels!

  • on the umpteenth time of watching this I thought I heard someone whistling at 1:39 and looked carefully and thought I saw Gilel open his mouth. Is it just me or is someone else hearing this?

  • This is nothing more than true love for all mankind! God bless to all of you!

  • @IFUCKEDYOULOTS It really annoys me seeing someone "troll" a video. People like you write these stupid comments just so they can get attention. Why are you even flaming this video. You've written exactly the same things on other videos just to get attention- what are you- a 5 year old? I'm here to listen to perfection, not to see some dumb arse attention seeker spam the comments.

  • Press 1 then press 9. Look at that hair.

  • @JstHudson i loled.Yes i actually loled.

  • I want this song to be played at my funeral...... So beautiful

  • 90 ppl seems to me completely deaf.

  • His hair was so neatly combed...

  • Clearly an outstanding pianist, but I don't like a lot of what he does with this piece. Far too loose rhythmically and I agree with the uploader about the melodic part of the intro. Far too accentuated and therefore loses the depth of the undertones of the chords.

    Not that I should comment, I've been unsuccessfully trying to learn this piece for about 2 years and it's HARD. However, listen to Rach himself playing it and you'll see what I mean.

    /watch?v=mTRm_N6MHz4

  • that man - that man was one beautiful artist.

  • I hear 10 pianos, not one.

  • That cough at the end, what a cunt-fuck

  • Awesome...

    

  • I can't imagine doing anything with such passion, truly Gilels is a legend.

  • @bosespeakersystem13 Oh my God, if they only know the key signature this was in... plus freakin' double sharps everywherraaa!

  • @bosespeakersystem13 now they're a popular boysband ;)

  • @bosespeakersystem13 Well, everthing looks easy when performed by a master...

  • 4:07 How dare you cough during this performance! To the gallows with you!

  • LIMITLESS

  • Does anyone find that Rachmaninoff's no. 2s are usually really good?

  • He's playing like "Yeah, I got this!"

  • Dracula is pissed 

  • 2:33-3:31

  • Awesome!

    I really love the way he plays :P

  • @Sissco Not to belabor the point, there are many pianists who have tried to perform this, none come closer than Gilels (and Horowitz, Moiseiwitsch) to the standard that Rachmaninoff sets in his own peformance - and Gilels was Rachmaninoff's preferred artist, in fact Rach praised all three: Gilels, Horowitz and Moiseiwitsch.

    Who are we to dissent from Rach himself in his preferences? :-))

  • they should mute the one coughing at the end .. or go back in time and beat him up :P

  • I'M IN LOVE ! the way he plays, is soooo sexy!

  • @75mpp me too

  • I'll go with the only pianist Rachmaninoff himself ever sanctioned to play his infamous Prelude: Mickey Mouse.

  • @JoeTownley Speaking of Rachmaninoff, Rach said he considered Gilels the only pianist worthy of being called his "successor" in pianism!

  • @Bret6464 What a slap in the face to Horowitz, who we all assumed was Rach's best buddy when it came to pianists. I'll never forgive Horowitz for reneging on his promise to Rach on his deathbed to learn and record Rach's First Concerto. Do you know of a book that gives Rach's opinions on the music personalities of his day? For example I've always wondered what he thought of Arthur Rubinstein, Gershwin, and Saint-Saens. Any reference would be greatly appreciated.

  • @JoeTownley Rachmaninoff was Horowitz's best friend. The reference for Rach's great admiration for Gilels is from 'GilelsFoundation' (Archives - that also has the Anton Rubinstein medal that was given to Rach, which Rach in turn gave to Gilels). Rachmaninoff, Horowitz and Gilels are the greatest in pianism, IMO, they are extraordinary musicians. Arthur Rubinstein is everything but and can not be confused as having performed in the same "style" as Rach :-)

  • @Bret6464 Thanks for the very interesting info. I once read that Rach attended a party where a lot of musical dignitaries were present. Gershwin was pounding out some jazz of his for quite a while. When Rach had had enough he boomed out, "Horowitz, play the Carmen Variations!" Gershwin had to obligingly surrender the keyboard to an embarrassed Horowitz. I know Rach attended the premiere of Rhapsody in Blue but did he ever privately express an opinion of Gershwin or his music, do you know?

  • @JoeTownley I am not aware of a credible source on exactly what Rach said about Gershwin and his music. There are anectodal accounts of Rach having gone backstage after Gershwin's premier of Rhapsody in Blue - he most likely said something "nice" and complemented him. On the other hand, Rach complemented many others. Rach most likely preferred "classical" composers of his era (his love of Scriabin's works and his preference for Horowitz as a composer over Gershwin)

  • @Bret6464 Well, thanks for that as well. Rach certainly wasn't shy about giving his opinion on MacDowell. He writes that he and a friend once had an evening to kill so they took in a concert in which MacDowell's Second Piano Concerto was being played. Afterward, Rach writes, "Heard a performance of a bad piano concerto by some American composer named Dowell." I'd sure like to read more of Rach's opinions. Are his letters available?

  • Dude the starting notes are SUPPOSED to be extremely loud..

  • im going to grow my hair long so i may properly perform this piece.

  • in soviet russia, piano plays you

  • @albe002a What the hell are you talking about? This is not fail compilation video, ignorant.

  • @BalladeNumber1Opus23 Lol, I think it can be taken as this music is so moving, you just let it take you. Therefore "the music plays you", in a way. It's actually a pretty deep statement, haha!

  • @Sissco I know it is your opinion, but .. Playing vocal notes is the thing that you supposed to do when you are a pianist. If you don't do that, then you are nothing of a pianist. Anyways Rachmaninov wanted it like that, and i would say .. Russians know how to play piano.. And i understand it is your opinion, and this is mine..

  • Naw pple, rachmaninoff himself simply invited this guy up to heaven for a cup of tea and a hearty clap on the back and say man! you understand me!

  • hulde!

  • best part 1:48 to 3:05

  • i think the guy in the bottem right is a vampire

  • What a stain that rat coughing at the end is.

  • he is having sex with piano

  • russians know what is music.

  • @Claymore2408 and how to make a shank out of a screwdriver

  • Bottom righthand corner. Dracula, with frankenstein sitting right behind him!

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz in Soviet Russia, the music listens to you! :D

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz Bahahaha that just made my day! :)

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz xaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxx

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz just choosing the right song for their next movie ;)

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz and Gilels looks like the wolfman. Universal monster movies haha

  • @BuCk3tH3AdZ0rz

    ahaha! i feel bad for that guy. but funny at the same time.

  • Sounds awesome, but that tempo change in the middle is a little bit more than Agitato, so different it is, it's like a variation on a theme.

  • For a guy who tosses off the Tchaikovsky First like it's a Sunday morning walk in the park, playing this must be the equivalent of scratching an itch on his scalp. Where IS his scalp, anyhow?

    By the way, please stop by my YT page and have a listen to my Second Piano Concerto. Much appreciated.

  • This is from Gilels' biography :-))

    "Rachmaninov decided that Gilels alone was worthy of being called his successor in terms of pianism and even went so far as to send him his medal and diploma. This medal, engraved with the profile of Anton Rubinstein, and diploma were once presented to Rachmaninov to symbolize his succession from Rubinstein, and Rachmaninov himself added Gilels' name to the document."

  • He plays the top notes way too dang hard. It makes me wince each time.

  • @faiiiill234532 He's also playing it incredibly slow. :/

  • @faiiiill234532 Everyone has a different interpretation of the piece, he has incorporated emotions into ' the top notes' by playing them slightly louder than the other notes, to indicate the changing emotions that should come through as the piece is played along.

  • @claudsxnadakins i think it sounds more better

  • Gilels did not die. God called him for piano lessons!

  • @ct5010 nice one! XD

  • music is so beautiful.

    this piece sturs such emotion within me I cannot even multitask. I am sucked in by the passion.

  • What a great musicianship.... Emil Gilels, together with Samson Francois and Rudolf Buchbinder, is one of the greatest pianists ever. Too bad he passed away far too early for me to ever see him perform live....

  • Dracula OwO

  • la vita e la morte. grazie Russia

  • \m/

  • i think its beautiful

  • the tune sounds really strange for me. I wonder if its a different tune to european standart tuning or if its just untuned

  • Wow, that piano sounds horrible for this musical piece, this musical piece needs a more harmonic sounding piano, and may I suggest an older piano :)

  • @Shahar333 Definitely agree!!! 

  • The tone of the piano is so sharp and silvery.

    Hard to believe this is one of Rachmaninov's earliest compositions

  • ah, can I ask you guys when was this performance on?

  • @Oistrakhfollower it says 1977 for this piece on his Wikipedia article

  • i wish i could achieve this level within 3 years from now.. maybe play this amazing piece at my recital :3

  • @ThaEminem Sure! You could do it! It honestly isn't that hard to read, however, you should know how to phrase well if you want to try it out. Good luck :)

  • This piece is incredible on its own. Then factor in that he wrote this when he was 17.

  • @hellomate639 I think he was 19, actually. But still, it is amazing!

  • I apologize, but how do you pronounce Gilels? I've been a fan for like a year but I don't know how to say his name xD

  • @MsThisNameIsTaken Same problem here. :)

  • @MsThisNameIsTaken I think it's eh-MEEL Gill-ELLS.

  • @underwoodamy95 Thanks that's what I thought :D

  • I can't get enough of this!

  • I adoooore;;;<3

  • this piece was too much for his hair

  • @squiggly123random

    Shut up, it's a masterpiece performed by best pianist of 20-th century

  • @hovo160 i know in fact this is one of my favorite pieces for piano, and i have huge respect for gilels.

  • @squiggly123random I guess it wasn't a "hair" piece? ... please, no death threats... :b

  • @squiggly123random too funny! yes I agree! this piece gets me everytime! speechless

    

  • its funny how his hairstyle changes by the end of the piece

  • my piano teacher told me to look this song up since I'm going to learn this piece next week....holy shizzleeeeeeeee how the hell can I learn this?!?!?

  • Too fast.  For the love of God, its TOO FAST!

    ..just kidding

  • Sorry for posting a comment twice in a row but I have a quick question, just wondering if anyone can help. How do you play both the C# and B at the same time when they're almost 2 octaves apart? Same goes for the other part with the octaves.

  • @TinselFairy Physically you can't, unless you have really big hands. In the G. Schirmer version, the two notes are linked by a square bracket, which means you have to play C# and then quickly jump to B. It should be done as swiftly as possible so as not to ruin the flow of the middle section, but the most important thing is that you press deeply on the C# so as to sustain a continuing bass voice that sustains itself until the next phrase, since C# is the most importance note of the piece

  • @TinselFairy As with the octaves in the final part, you apply the same concept as I explained in my first comment. You will need to play the two notes swiftly, but pressing deeply on the C# octaves so as to sustain that continuing bass line that should 'hum' until the end of the phrase, like you would hear the bass voices in Bach's Fugue's in a pipe organ, played with emphasis and sustained until the next phrase.

  • I've just started learning this. There's no way I could ever compose anything like this in 2 years time! Absolutely inspirational.

  • I was asked to memorize this after finally getting through without a mistake, I left my lessons after 12 years to come back 5 years later as this and my teacher inspired me so.

  • This video is so inspiring, the thought a 19 year old composed this is awe-inspiring. I'm a young pianist and I love this piece. Where could I fine sheet music it this?

  • very good btw 1:39 "wait what was that on the invisible sheet music? oh yea I can play it perfectly so i don't need to know" lol

  • listening to this after having a dream about drowning is the most intense thing to experience.

  • The tale goes, he wrote this after dreaming of drowning.......Sergei your dreams fuel people today and will till the end of time....

  • I love this song and I've been trying to play it all summer... I don't think my hands are big enough though :(

  • who is c sharp minor?

  • @Omatunto it says"in c sharp minor" gotta be the name of the place right ? are you kidding ?

  • @Omatunto joking??

  • the guy on the bottom right is play angry birds

  • I just learned this piece (and I posted a recording of it on here) and my 40-something-year-old teacher was telling me that this was almost too hard for him to play yet I think I can play it pretty well, being a 14-year-old.

  • i can play the first 11 seconds :D

    

  • @Laudan08

    Some geniuses are born, some geniuses are discovered later. Don't take great people such as Rachmaninoff and Shostakovich and be disappointed in yourself. But if you must be, use that as rage-fuel to get yourself kick-started.

    Not everyone can be as good as the greats at first, I've learned that quite a few times already.

  • i think a lot of the views were brought by True Colours on FanFic.net

  • Truly Beautiful!! Musical Poetry!!!

  • Please stop calling this a song. A song must have words. This does not. It is a piece of music. Any musician could tell you that.

  • @ultrasions yeah I can say that!

  • @ultrasions what makes you sure of that? any musician may also say you're wrong

  • @ultrasions sorry, misread everything. i thought you said it is not music, scared me

  • @ultrasions I'm pretty sure a song does not to have words in it. I think that's mostly opinion. You could call a song a piece of music also.

  • @iGookin But a song is sung by a singer (and I know a piece is NOT pieced by a 'piecer'). People sing songs, they do not sing pieces. Just as players play pieces; they do not play songs. Moreover, imagine if you're listening to the radio one day and it's like "The top ten pieces for tonight" or whatever. There is a reason why the two are not used interchangeably. I dunno, it's difficult to explain, but hopefully I've put it coherently enough. It's a little more than 'opinion', I feel.

  • @ohninjaplease Pieces of literature can be interpreted as anything from Debussy to a choral arrangement to an opera. The words 'song' and 'literature' are used too loosely in music that you can never pinpoint an actaul definition to them. I understand your opinion, but disagree

  • @iGookin I see what you're saying, but "song" simply describes "literature" in specific. All songs are literature and all pieces are literature. When you search up "song" it specifically says 'singing'. So yes, literature can be songs, but literature can also be pieces. But a song cannot be a piece. It's kind of like how a square is a rectangle but a rectangle cannot be a square? I dunno I've just never really seen anyone with musical knowledge (which I believe you have) call a piece a song haha

  • @ultrasions I agree with you (and I am a violin player) but I feel that we do not have to DIVIDE "song" and "piece" so strictly. 'Cause a "piece" is also a "song" of an instrument. Gilels sings through his piano, Oistrakh sings through his violin. Word choice is very important, but not as important as music itself. Anyway I love your comment.

  • @ultrasions its still a cool song ...........(got any troll food? jk)

  • @ultrasions what about Schubert's "Lieder ohne Worte" (Songs without words =D) ?

    nono you're right ;)

  • @ultrasions no, any person having a lil piece of mind could tell you that

  • @ultrasions Correct. Another way of putting it is that for a piece of music to be a 'song' one must be able to 'sing' it.

  • @ultrasions Unless it's Mendelssohn's Song Without Words...lol

  • @ultrasions Who cares what its called.

  • @ultrasions You really are a stupid fuck !

  • @ultrasions well mendelsohn has songs without words.. XD no i agree with you...

  • How come I have a feeling that a vampire will arise from the piano during the dramatic sequences?

  • wow!

  • Can you say... "I whip my hair back and forth"? I absolutely love this song.

  • 0:00 to 4:08 was just amazing!! Look at his hair before and after he played this...

  • @ct5010 HAHA xD His hair xD

    Rachmaninoff is totally amazing <3

  • 86 people are...you almost thought I was going to make a lame joke there, didn't you?