I recall someone from "pilots for 911 truth" made a statement that the planes might have been "beefed up" (his words) to be able to fly at such high speeds so close to the ground. So just because it wasn't the alleged flights that hit the buildings, doesn't meen that it wasn't planes at all.
It is not what hit that matters. Just what didnt hit. And the 911 TV broadcasts are fake like Cartoon network. Check the TV archives and use logic. Its not even close to real TV....
Then I wonder who did it? It would seem beyond ludicrous to argue that it didn't happen. There were literally thousands of eye witnesses to the second hit...not to mention the films. Just goes to show people believe what they want to believe. To hell with the evidence. That just confuses the issue.
From our little "exchange": Keep in mind, 2 out of the 3 reporters "on site" underneath the towers spoke about a missile attack (Dick Oliver and Don Dahler, both Live). The last one did not hear a plane "it just exploded" (BBC Live). Actually, the real eyewitnesses reported anything but a huge jetliner. Some spoke of Cessnas, other spoke of "never seen a plane like that before" etc. The videos of this is all hopefully still available on youtube, otherwise its in the archives.
@WearechangeN Funny, that's the first thing I heard when I was listening to NPR when it happened. The reporter said a "small" plane like a commuter or twin engine crashed into the tower not a jetliner.
@cunnidvd 100% correct. One thread that runs through all "truther" crap is a deep anti-Israel sentiment. That came first,then the conspiracy nonsense.
Demand an honest REINVESTIGATION, end the senseless war & then jail those really responsible! Those guilty bastards / criminals should not be walking free.
I too am beginning to wonder what really went on..... but one thing I do know is what happened AFTER 9/11 seems to have little bearing or justification even based on offical accounts. Its seems like one giant blank fear cheque.
@ExposeZionistCrimes September clues came out at about the same time the Pentagon false plane strike was being exposed for the "no plane" (no 'passenger' plane) that it was. To muddy the search engines and waters. Sept clues fails in it's actual science of digital videography. The best they have is 'nose out' but it turns out one more frame on to be like the 'moving pins in wood' toy, put your hand on one side it shows on the other, same thing. The digital zoom in used how much fractal fill in?
@ISamuelII Like I said, I'm not sure how much I believe, but it gets into the media accomplices who defined what was going on and the number of people connected to the media who were interviewed that day. Combine this with the zionists in tv studios that day with speeches already prepared and it puts some things together.
@ExposeZionistCrimes I didn't mean to sound harsh toward you, just being short n blunt. True the media is pulling along with those that plotted the attacks, Networks, count em three of them, told of the unexpected demise of the third one WTC7 too early. Wea ll know these things, and SC was as I said, with the timing and the two combined words "no planes". Two planes landed many floors above sea level in NYC that day, by remote operation by my understanding.
@ISamuelII "Two planes landed many floors above" Technically speaking.
Another big point made that hit Rense with my name mentioned was about the seismographs readings. A tower built to sway would not register a 2.0 plus on the scale with a planes impact so high up the towers. A big blast in a basement would. They had the timing off by 'that much' too early with the basement burst.
@ISamuelII Even with remote controlled planes you would have a problem with them traveling as fast as they said they were, and you also have a problem with people not hearing the sound. If you have ever spent time at an airport you know that low flying planes are very easy and obvious to hear. Some of the people on 9/11 who were "witnesses" make no mention of planes, even though they were very close to the site. I think the whole panes/noplanes, mininukes/nanothermite,etc are cnterproductive rly
@ExposeZionistCrimes The audio canyons of a big city make the sound issue moot. A lot of people heard and turned enough to say real planes were there, 737s anyone?? Parts pointed to that and was never countered at all, except by flat bed truck parts dropped off,,, on the DB buildings roof too?? RC737s, look the same as 767s but 3 minor points in profile not visible in any video.
@ISamuelII I have to add this anomaly from a Jones early video, within 4 months time of. A woman standing on the street with a wide view. As the flight goes over head is heard (trusting the vid/aud link up) saying "that is not an AA airplane". Yeah, it was supposed to be a United for the second. Something hit me as strange and why would Jones print that anomaly??
@ExposeZionistCrimes "problem with them traveling as fast as" I forgot to address the speed, a 737 can. I noticed a trend on yt, zionazis favor the NYC-no plane.
Planes usually doesn't land in steel-concrete buildings, they crash against them. "No planes" is a Zionist shill-speak-term used to discredit TV fakery research. The fact remains that the TV networks broadcast fake videos on LIVE TV on 9/11. Anyone who actually does the research into this on their own will see this. Go to ArchiveDOTorg and look up the original TV archives from 9/11.
I urge you to visit youtube channel SimonShack and SeptemberCluesDOTinfo
The best "they" have is not the nose-out fiasco, but the countless number of f--ck ups in the TV footage, like the contradictory flightpaths on different networks, and missing plane in the NBC live footage, the missing wing on Luc Couchesnes footage etc, fake soundtracks, same woman on 3 different "amateur videos" etc.
@WearechangeN You mean the "dive bomber" approach, which was sped up video made to look like a dive?? No, all of the cameras captured the same flight. I wish people would spend half an hour looking into digital compression and how the computer fills in gaps on super zooms. The "footage" with the SC, was zoomed in from near the horizon away by the hardware, and then software did another zoom in after that! The no plane is exactly what the pentangon hit is, a diversion in NYC.
@poetwarriors The excuse to go to a war with another nation was "to arrest one man"? How many lies have been found out about Iraq, and the yellow cake was exposed for the lies it was before the invasion, but the wars still stand over lies??
In the video I just passed along, I ask what ideology would bring both far left and right together to lie about the facts regarding the 9 11 attacks? Just clues to goals and guilt. I love that rap Sooo much '"BL didn't blow up the projects, it was you,,,"
I agree, it did not happen the way the official story has evolved. Pilots for 9 11 truth have the pentagon attack broken apart enough to go into a court. What I've read on that day and the next all the same web pages go bye bye, tells me how they did it with remote flight controls.
Hello my friend... thank you so much for the share... more confirmation that 911 was a HOAX for special Interest Agenda... and it points to ZioNAZI IsraHell and Possibly the CIA... same Organizing Pair that Killed President JFK...smile
@SiNaoia You are always welcome. Voices of reason can over come these of myths and liars. There are so many points to state, "this shows culpability", but they all can not be listed in here too easy with the limits imposed.
See 2002nobodys newest I passed along. That rap has caught me, the first ever I guess. I wanna pump my fist in the air!
so when did guy lose his job? unless he's retired.
katkal3 6 months ago
I recall someone from "pilots for 911 truth" made a statement that the planes might have been "beefed up" (his words) to be able to fly at such high speeds so close to the ground. So just because it wasn't the alleged flights that hit the buildings, doesn't meen that it wasn't planes at all.
bjorinn 1 year ago
@bjorinn
It is not what hit that matters. Just what didnt hit. And the 911 TV broadcasts are fake like Cartoon network. Check the TV archives and use logic. Its not even close to real TV....
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@bjorinn Name the person,or it is HEAR SAY.
Beefed up[his words ] [WHOS] Meaning WHAT,
767`s cannot fly at 500 mph at 1300 feet.
YOUR WRONG.PERIOD.
2000tc88 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that's the truth plain and simple
darealcase 1 year ago
He is telling the truth, he must be a terrorist conspiracy theorist. LOL.
biped19 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 inside job
fuckinshite0 1 year ago
Then I wonder who did it? It would seem beyond ludicrous to argue that it didn't happen. There were literally thousands of eye witnesses to the second hit...not to mention the films. Just goes to show people believe what they want to believe. To hell with the evidence. That just confuses the issue.
cunnidvd 1 year ago
@cunnidvd
Who did it?
Who controls the media?
Who were caught celebrating while the towers came down? (dancing israelis)
Who has the most influence over Congress? (AIPAC, ADL)
What ties them all together?
Evidence never confuses the issue. Eyewitness accounts are notoriosly unreliable. google: "Fake video dramatically alters eyewitness accounts"
Please visit the entire Simonshack youtube channel. Send me a PM or reply if u got questions.
WearechangeN 1 year ago 2
@WearechangeN
From our little "exchange": Keep in mind, 2 out of the 3 reporters "on site" underneath the towers spoke about a missile attack (Dick Oliver and Don Dahler, both Live). The last one did not hear a plane "it just exploded" (BBC Live). Actually, the real eyewitnesses reported anything but a huge jetliner. Some spoke of Cessnas, other spoke of "never seen a plane like that before" etc. The videos of this is all hopefully still available on youtube, otherwise its in the archives.
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@WearechangeN Funny, that's the first thing I heard when I was listening to NPR when it happened. The reporter said a "small" plane like a commuter or twin engine crashed into the tower not a jetliner.
3089280288 11 months ago
@cunnidvd 100% correct. One thread that runs through all "truther" crap is a deep anti-Israel sentiment. That came first,then the conspiracy nonsense.
meemoonses 1 year ago
@meemoonses
why do you post when your posts contain nothing but worthless assumptions?
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@WearechangeN "why do you post" /// Because I can.
meemoonses 1 year ago
Demand an honest REINVESTIGATION, end the senseless war & then jail those really responsible! Those guilty bastards / criminals should not be walking free.
~South Africa~
annie46664 1 year ago
I too am beginning to wonder what really went on..... but one thing I do know is what happened AFTER 9/11 seems to have little bearing or justification even based on offical accounts. Its seems like one giant blank fear cheque.
poetwarriors 1 year ago
@poetwarriors watch 911missinglinks
and also september clues- this one is rather odd and not sure how much I accept, but it talks about the possibility of tv fakery
ExposeZionistCrimes 1 year ago
@ExposeZionistCrimes September clues came out at about the same time the Pentagon false plane strike was being exposed for the "no plane" (no 'passenger' plane) that it was. To muddy the search engines and waters. Sept clues fails in it's actual science of digital videography. The best they have is 'nose out' but it turns out one more frame on to be like the 'moving pins in wood' toy, put your hand on one side it shows on the other, same thing. The digital zoom in used how much fractal fill in?
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII Like I said, I'm not sure how much I believe, but it gets into the media accomplices who defined what was going on and the number of people connected to the media who were interviewed that day. Combine this with the zionists in tv studios that day with speeches already prepared and it puts some things together.
ExposeZionistCrimes 1 year ago
@ExposeZionistCrimes I didn't mean to sound harsh toward you, just being short n blunt. True the media is pulling along with those that plotted the attacks, Networks, count em three of them, told of the unexpected demise of the third one WTC7 too early. Wea ll know these things, and SC was as I said, with the timing and the two combined words "no planes". Two planes landed many floors above sea level in NYC that day, by remote operation by my understanding.
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII "Two planes landed many floors above" Technically speaking.
Another big point made that hit Rense with my name mentioned was about the seismographs readings. A tower built to sway would not register a 2.0 plus on the scale with a planes impact so high up the towers. A big blast in a basement would. They had the timing off by 'that much' too early with the basement burst.
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII Even with remote controlled planes you would have a problem with them traveling as fast as they said they were, and you also have a problem with people not hearing the sound. If you have ever spent time at an airport you know that low flying planes are very easy and obvious to hear. Some of the people on 9/11 who were "witnesses" make no mention of planes, even though they were very close to the site. I think the whole panes/noplanes, mininukes/nanothermite,etc are cnterproductive rly
ExposeZionistCrimes 1 year ago
@ExposeZionistCrimes The audio canyons of a big city make the sound issue moot. A lot of people heard and turned enough to say real planes were there, 737s anyone?? Parts pointed to that and was never countered at all, except by flat bed truck parts dropped off,,, on the DB buildings roof too?? RC737s, look the same as 767s but 3 minor points in profile not visible in any video.
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII I have to add this anomaly from a Jones early video, within 4 months time of. A woman standing on the street with a wide view. As the flight goes over head is heard (trusting the vid/aud link up) saying "that is not an AA airplane". Yeah, it was supposed to be a United for the second. Something hit me as strange and why would Jones print that anomaly??
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ExposeZionistCrimes "problem with them traveling as fast as" I forgot to address the speed, a 737 can. I noticed a trend on yt, zionazis favor the NYC-no plane.
SlackerSlayer 1 year ago
@ISamuelII
Planes usually doesn't land in steel-concrete buildings, they crash against them. "No planes" is a Zionist shill-speak-term used to discredit TV fakery research. The fact remains that the TV networks broadcast fake videos on LIVE TV on 9/11. Anyone who actually does the research into this on their own will see this. Go to ArchiveDOTorg and look up the original TV archives from 9/11.
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@ISamuelII
I urge you to visit youtube channel SimonShack and SeptemberCluesDOTinfo
The best "they" have is not the nose-out fiasco, but the countless number of f--ck ups in the TV footage, like the contradictory flightpaths on different networks, and missing plane in the NBC live footage, the missing wing on Luc Couchesnes footage etc, fake soundtracks, same woman on 3 different "amateur videos" etc.
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@WearechangeN You mean the "dive bomber" approach, which was sped up video made to look like a dive?? No, all of the cameras captured the same flight. I wish people would spend half an hour looking into digital compression and how the computer fills in gaps on super zooms. The "footage" with the SC, was zoomed in from near the horizon away by the hardware, and then software did another zoom in after that! The no plane is exactly what the pentangon hit is, a diversion in NYC.
SlackerSlayer 1 year ago
@ExposeZionistCrimes
Please visit all parts of the site SeptemberCluesDOTinfo
Join the forum too, it's the bomb. ;-)
WearechangeN 1 year ago
@poetwarriors The excuse to go to a war with another nation was "to arrest one man"? How many lies have been found out about Iraq, and the yellow cake was exposed for the lies it was before the invasion, but the wars still stand over lies??
In the video I just passed along, I ask what ideology would bring both far left and right together to lie about the facts regarding the 9 11 attacks? Just clues to goals and guilt. I love that rap Sooo much '"BL didn't blow up the projects, it was you,,,"
ISamuelII 1 year ago
I agree, it did not happen the way the official story has evolved. Pilots for 9 11 truth have the pentagon attack broken apart enough to go into a court. What I've read on that day and the next all the same web pages go bye bye, tells me how they did it with remote flight controls.
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII
Hello my friend... thank you so much for the share... more confirmation that 911 was a HOAX for special Interest Agenda... and it points to ZioNAZI IsraHell and Possibly the CIA... same Organizing Pair that Killed President JFK...smile
SiNaoia 1 year ago 2
@SiNaoia You are always welcome. Voices of reason can over come these of myths and liars. There are so many points to state, "this shows culpability", but they all can not be listed in here too easy with the limits imposed.
See 2002nobodys newest I passed along. That rap has caught me, the first ever I guess. I wanna pump my fist in the air!
ISamuelII 1 year ago
@ISamuelII
:-)))
SiNaoia 1 year ago