He is a Very good dancer indeed .I would to see Sree and Andre back in action . these cricketers needs to be there , After all Cricket is not all about gentleman's game anymore .
nel is a loser... a big sucker in life.. else he would not have taunted a bowler batting there.. having done that , he should have bowled him the next ball... congrats sree..
nel is a loser... a big sucker in life.. else he would not have taunted a bowler batting there.. having done that , he should have bowled him the next ball... congrats sree..
400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, constituting 99% of the total population of Hindus living in Muslim majority area of the Kashmir Valley, were forcibly pushed out of the Valley by Muslim terrorists, trained in Pakistan, since the end of 1989.
This is not human rights abuses I guess. Its funny how Pakistanis always see one side of the equation. I don't know if it is a part of your genetic make-up or it is an acquired trait that comes from hanging out those of your ilk.
"Its funny how Pakistanis always see one side of the equation"
well at the end of the day they chose to leave, they were not ordered at gun point.
and as mentioned previously, you interfered with bangladesh so why cry when others do it to you?
part of our genetic make up? LMAO
maybe having blind faith is an indian trait, whether its genetic i would highly doubt. you dont like to hear the truth, carry on watching ndtv news, lol
but India interfered with Bangladesh not in isolation. There were tens of millions of Bangaldeshi refugees who were pouring into India due to the massacre by the Pakistani Army. Why should India bear the brunt of security risk and dealing with millions of refugees?
That is not interference. Pakistan is separated from Bangladesh by Indian territory. It is logistically impossible to stay out of any conflict in such a case. India became involved only at the point where Bangladesh was a gone case for Pakistan. There may have been some covert intelligence support but it was too late in the timeline. Pakistan lost Bangladesh in 1967-68 itself. India got involved only after the Pak Army started massacring.
Dude most Indians admit that there are himan rights abuse. We do not run away from reality and we do not create propaganda websites. But these abuses don't occur in isolation. These are semi-war zones, you think the islamic terrorists don't create abuses - the biggest evidence being the migration of millions of Hindus from the Kashmir. Try going to Pashtun websites and see how your Army is being accused of human rights abuses. HR abuses are collateral effects in war zones.
This is why i love cricket. Check out Nel's reaction after the 6 he is trying to contain his laughter it's great. I myself am indian and not so much a fan of sreesanth but this was too funny. Good cricket all round.
i am a pakistani .... bt i can say that indian rokxxx....they are great...and we should not forgot that we are made from india.... they had always helped us... politicaly and financialy.... i love pakistan as well as india....:)
@SufiSaint the fuckin pakistani mother fuck.... u blody ass hole ...u dont knw india gave pakistan $100 million during the flood which came in pakistan this year..... u r a bloddy dickhead.... sooo sooooooo poor country...with a litrecy rate of 48%.... hahahhahaha
You bastards are used to walking around with a beggar's bowl around western nations. Pakistan is a whore of a nation and its illegitimate terrorist offspring with the west are slapping it today across its face with their cocks.
Of course not. India receives very little aid and it dosen't care for any aid because it's too piddly. I think the western nations give it because it makes them feel good about themselves. But really the aid itself is inconsequential and is actually counter-productive because it comes with a lot of terms and conditions. Not worth the trouble for $10-15 million. I believe India had even refused aid for the same reasons a few years back.
Pakistan actually receives substantial foreign aid. I mean the economy is pretty much dependant on foreign aid. Take away a couple of billion and the economy can come crashing down. Until a couple of years back, Pakistan was on the verge of defaulting - thankfully for Pakistan, 9/11 happened and it got a few billions from the US.
£800m over a period of 3 years!! When you compare it to the size of India's economy at $2 trillion, its like throwing a matchstick into the Sun. You are mistaken. Right through the 70's through 80's, India lived under virtual economic isolation with sanctions from the US, leave aside foreign aid. India's foreign aid per capita is $1.7 Compare this to Pakistan at $8.70.
I am mistaken? how am i mistaken? it was on the bbc news website, are you calling that a fake report? ok tell me one thing then, if india really has no need for a pittance amount like 800m (according to you) why do they accept?
has india not been the largest recipient of aid from the UK in a historical context?
You are mistaken when you say India received a lot of aid. India may have been the largest recipient of UK aid NOT EQUAL TO India received a lot of aid. The fact is when you look at foreign aid, you have to compare it relative to the size of the economy. India's foreign aid per capita is $1.7 Compare this to Pakistan at $8.70 - which means on average a Pakistani citizen received 5 times more aid. I am not even going into the composition of aid, which was also unfavorable to India.
Germany, the world's second largest provider of development aid after the United States, gave 67.5 million euros (97.4 million dollars) in aid to China in 2007 and 84 million euros to India in 2008, according to its most recent report.
Pak does receive large amounts of aid, no one is denying that Sanjay but how quickly you indians forget you too were in the same situation.
Not to mention the composition of foreign aid. 90-95% of India's foreign aid is in the form of soft loans - money returned back to the donor. Pakistan on the other hand receives virtual grants in the form of military assistance, much of which is diverted against India - something acknowledged by their own leader. Almost their entire defense budget is financed by aid - money not returned.
if you were Pakistani would you not direct the money against india?
its not like india are a brotherly nation with good intentions is it?
i would direct it all towards india and their evil intentions. no matter how much india spends on its defence industry the nuclear weapons are a leveller, mutually assured destruction.
Brotherly intentions? Why in the world would India have brotherly intentions towards a pesty and hostile neighbor? Did India start Kargil? Did India create organized terrorist groups such as LeT and JeM? Even so, whether you want to divert money is a sovereign decision, as long as it pays the consequences in terms of reduced or no future foreign aid and insulting humiliating treatment from the rest of the world.
Have you ever asked this question to the Pakistani Army as to how it treated its Bangladeshi citizens? Bangladesh was a gone case before India even entered the war. Stop blaming India for it.
There is a difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh. Kashmir is a disputed territory and was a peaceful territitory - until Pakistan started sending terrorists to kill civilians. Bangladesh was always a part of Pakistan but your Punjabis treat every other community as crap whether they are Bengalis, Sindhis, Balochs's or Pashtuns. And you paid the price for it.
No infact it was proven otherwise. That it was the Pakistani sponsored terrorists who killed 36 Sikhs in daylight murder. I think if "proven" means in Pakistani, then yeah - proven. Its funny how everything is "proven" immediately to you when something is favorable to you, Yet not even tons of proof about your cheating cricketers is not enough as proof - you talk about "innocent until proven guilty". Its all good, all conveneient.
@ZaiidHamid The authors of the report, Justice (Retd) Ajit Singh Bains, and Justice (Retd) Justice (Retd) Inderjit Singh Jaijee and Lt.-Gen. (Retd) Kartar Singh Gill, conclude that the Indian government's counterinsurgency forces, which are run by the Indian intelligence service, RAW, are responsible for the massacre of Chatti Singhpora.
I already know India is a poor country, but poorer so than Pakistan. But poverty is far less a crime than losing your self-respect, which Pakistan has time and again faced over the years. Can you imagine a head of state being told by a third rate American official that "We will bomb you back to the Stone Age". OR the Americans routinely firing drones into Pakistani territory with no respect for Pakistani sovereignty or the aid it begs for.
Let the Americans even try saying it. lol. India is no Pakistan and they know it. And the world knows it. That is why they altered their Constitution to accommodate the Indian nuclear deal. It would be laughable to even think about something like that in pakistan's case.
Following reports of possible misuse of millions of pounds extended to India as educational aid by the United Kingdom, Britain has launched an enquiry into the matter. The funds were meant for the 'Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan', to help poor children get a decent education. It is, however, believed that the money never reached the deserving and is suspected to have been gobbled up by the corruption demons.
Lol. You are telling me things I already know. Diversion due to corruption happens in all countries, including Pakistan, which has a corruption ranking of 143 compared to India's 87 - so the less said the better. The diversion of foreign military aid in Pakistan is unique to Pakistan in both scale and frequency. Pakistan's diversion of military aid is done as a policy, not due to corruption, which probably happens even more in Pakistan.
According to the latest measure of the United Nations Development Programme, which includes such indicators of deprivation as education and health, just eight Indian states have more poor people – 421 million – than the 28 poorest countries of Africa. In fact, undernutrition in India is twice as high as that in sub-Saharan Africa, with nearly half of India's 120 million children exposed to early death.
Until as recently in 2009, no one had a clue where US aid to Pakistan went. They had conditions attached to the aid, but there were no checks and balances as to ensure whether the conditions were actually followed. The fact is India's growth is largely self-driven right from the 60's through today. Pakistan, on the other hand, holds a gun to the world's head and says "We have N-weapons. Give me money, else I go down and I take you down with me".
India did receive quite a lot of aid, especially from the US during the 50's and 60's but that was curtailed during the 70's when india aligned itself with the commies.
Pakistan does not hold a gun as you so put with blackmail of the n-weapons, maybe in your indian media you would like to perpetuate that sort of rumour. Pak has spent a lot of money with the on going "war on terror" and should be reimbursed fully for that.
Whether India received less aid because of siding with the commies or testing a N-bomb is pointless. Either way India, as it stands today, stands on its own feet with little assistance from the West or anyone else. In the early 50's, India received some food aid from the US, but if you're comparing it at the scale of the hard cash assistance that Pakistan has received since the 80's, it is laughable.
I agree with you. The next war will be the decider. Actually the next terrorist attack will be the decider. And if Pakistani footprints are found again like in 26/11, then India will attack, N-war or no N-war.
It is not a matter of my choice. Foreign aid matters only if it has an impact. In India's case, it is meant only to make the foreigners make good about themselves, not to provide genuine assistance. Had India not received any piddly foreign aid, not one thing would have changed today. Literally not one thing.
NEW DELHI: Believe it or not when it comes to gender inequities India fares worse than Pakistan. In fact, the country fares lower than all other countries in South Asia save Afghanistan. These are the findings of the 2010 Human Development Report released by the United Nations Development Programme on Thursday as per its Gender Inequality Index.
and that is what you guys are so proud of? starving people?
Dude you are taking selective indicators that suit you. Don't make me start pulling up statistics as a whole. You have to look it as a whole. Because barriing a couple, Pakistan is worse off on almost every other indicator - whether it is literacy, fertility rates, education, health, GDP per capita. India is generattions ahead of Pakistan.
I only used the corruption index because you were trying to highlight diverting foreign money due to corruption. I said that happens in all countries - more so in Pakistan because there is more corruption, hence the index. If you want to get into a India v/s Pakistan debate - Who is more poor? I am more than willing.
India is obviously poorer, you cannot have hundreds of millions starving, more so than the whole of sub-saharan Africa and claim to think your country is strong and independent.
Do you base the sucess of a nation by the money in the bank or the food on peoples tables?
Dude you need an Economics Course. If India has a large number of poor people, it is because India is bigger. Take a look at the World Human development Ranking of Pakistan. I believe in 2010 it is
India: 119
Pakistan 125
This is a cumulative index based on education, health, literacy etc. India is poor. Pakistan is poorer.
Rep. Edolphuis Towns speaking in the House said a probe ordered by two groups, the Punjab Human Rights Organisation and the Movement Against State Repression, and conducted by two retired judges and a retired army general have "clearly and unambiguously found the blame for massacre of Sikhs of village Chatti Singhpora lay on Indian government and not Pakistan or the Kashmiri militants as alleged by India.
Can you quote the sources of your links? Punjab Human Rights Group. Such an obvious Pakistani propagandist name. lol. Give me all your sources and links and references.
of course i can give you the source, just copy and paste the paragraph into google and it will give you the website, it doesnt allow me to post a link.
Some human rights organizations have also expressed doubt about the veracity of these admissions. Independent inquiries by human rights activists from Punjab and the Ludhiana-based International Human Rights Organization have found that it is unlikely that the attacks were carried out by Indian security forces themselves, and that the perpetrators were most likely renegades.
Page xi of the Mighty and the Almighty contains a reference to Hindu militants that will be deleted in subsequent printings, both in America and in international editions. This error was due to a failure in the fact-checking process.
You know these events happened pre 9/11 when the western world had not woken up to the propagandist attitude of the Islamic terrorists. I think post 9/11 it has smartened up to the propaganda that happens in Islamic countries against Hindu, Jew, Amrikans. These things don't sell anymore. You gotta find new frontiers to win. Lies don't work anymore
Human rights abuses?? Yeah maybe these are not abuses
Thirty five Hindus were killed in recent days in two separate incidents in the Indian-administered portion of the disputed Kashmir province, the police said.
The killings were believed to be handiwork of Islamist militants just days before a scheduled meeting between the Indian prime minister and Kashmiri separatists.
How is India poorer if India is 119 and Pakistan is 125? I think you have decided in your head that India thinks of itself an economic powerhouse. Well actually it is in the sense that it is a bigger economy and has more say in world economics. The answer is Yes - because of its size. I think you are confusing poverty with the term "economic powerhouse". Once again - India is poor nbut Pakistan is poorer. Based on the same source that you used to highlight your gender equality quote
LMAO@ "Foreign aid matters only if it has an impact. In India's case, it is meant only to make the foreigners make good about themselves"
YES YES, i am sure that is why india accepts it with open hands.
I highly doubt that India will go to war when (and not IF) there is another attack in india, you guys jump up and down a lot but nothing more than that. Your media is hysterical in its coverage, jingoistic to the maximum.
Btw, you are no Sufi you illiterate bastard. Pull your head out of your ass and swallow your false pride. It is stupid maderchodhs like you who make all Pakis and Muslims look bad.
madarchooooodd Sreeesanth FUCK U teriii maa ko choodo randi ki aulaad bharwa sallaa I AM A TRUE PAKISTANI and we alllllllllllllll hate india sooo much so FUCK so madarchood sreeeesaanthh sala ganda bharwaa indian MADARCHOOODD fuck india FUCK sreeesant's sister and mother hahahah GAY HIND FUCK INDIA
The most pathetic and over hyped bowler with the biggest of mouths - that's Andre Nel for you. It's strange that he was seldom punished for his headless antics.
im english and i tell ya sreesanth is one of my fave players now :) i have always been a fan of him and rp i hope they both get back into the indian side
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
TERRIBLE COMMENTARY....utter bias. Andre Nel was a good natured player, absolutely bonkers on the field but really effective and a nice fellow off it. Of course u expect bias from the Indian comms but what really sucks is 0:26. Leave ur personal opinions to urself
wow indian comentator forgot to tell the truth on mic. tha sreesanth is nadu and doesnt speak or understand english so forget argue. hahaah. and wata fagg sreesanth is. shaking asss on ground he should b in some where delhi selling ass and shakin for arabs.not in cricket bollywood jerk
So much English as your medium that you don't know that after a "full stop" you start the word of the first sentence with a capital alphabet. LOL, where do you curry cunts get so much agression from?
@Muneeb911 hey dude...y do u have to say that " i m a pakistani and I have to say that it was nicely done by Sreesanth". are people from pakistan are not suppose to praise and like an indian player....dont spoil the spirit dude....its fine if u do that...u can like any player.....live cricket and enjoy it !
lol nice
Raiden2o11 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ICC is very biased, only Sreesanth was fined, Nel deserved it too.
MelvinMechanicalEngg 3 months ago
Comment removed
MelvinMechanicalEngg 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looking for a job...??
A great opppurtunity to work at home ...
if intrested pls mail me at shashank683@yahoo.com
Note: U need not pay any money anywhere!!!
rohithnair11 4 months ago
andre nell joker , doesnt know how to bowl
Rockstar37178 4 months ago 4
8 dislikes are porki camel piss dinkers
kabir00786 4 months ago 4
LMAO!.....
SLICKR392 4 months ago
fuck u sreesath ass hole
asimiqbal25 4 months ago
they provided good comedy time
Arjunviru 5 months ago
BOTH PSYCHOS
rohan64bit 5 months ago 6
hmm.even if i heared about this frm any person.i wil be laughing
ravirocky7388 5 months ago
good reply
samara4743 5 months ago
john cena is that you?
HeavyVerbzz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nel go hang urself
10205072 6 months ago
He is a Very good dancer indeed .I would to see Sree and Andre back in action . these cricketers needs to be there , After all Cricket is not all about gentleman's game anymore .
They mix cricket with Emotions :)
TheYashu200 7 months ago
lol what a great anser given by shreesant nice kid asssw to nel
aaabbbhhhsss 8 months ago
1:18 wooo nell
aslambhai123211 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1:11 ho ha ho ho ho
alangervasis 9 months ago
sree santh sucks his own cock all night, he is bullshit even a 12 year old will hit a six ohim
aloomaster9 10 months ago
wat a reply!!!!
aryie20 10 months ago 4
sreesanth........is the real star
arjunms169 10 months ago
fuck andre nel sree santh rocks
rockfans1 10 months ago 37
here the reactions of commentators..
amal6911 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nel go to Hell...
vadayakshy 10 months ago
Nel go to Hell..................
vadayakshy 10 months ago
ROFLMAO!
cupidvogel 1 year ago
I lip read the incident.
Andre Nel-Show me the heart!!Show me the heart!!!You don't have it man!!!
SuperChocolateSauce 1 year ago
@rizzi2007 Let me say something you will understand. Go fuck yourself mate.
concolortube 1 year ago
What a fokken doos.
InturnetHaetMachine 1 year ago
well done sreesanth i m proud of you
tanujbhar 1 year ago 3
even the commentators can't control their emotions....lol
m4all 1 year ago 38
nel is a loser... a big sucker in life.. else he would not have taunted a bowler batting there.. having done that , he should have bowled him the next ball... congrats sree..
drvinodnarayanan 1 year ago
nel is a loser... a big sucker in life.. else he would not have taunted a bowler batting there.. having done that , he should have bowled him the next ball... congrats sree..
drvinodnarayanan 1 year ago 2
wow sreeeeeesaaaaanth thereee toooo gaaaaaand padeee achee hilti hai
hamzamd77 1 year ago 2
@hamzamd77 Porki. Sale Homo Porki....:)
BravadoBravo1 11 months ago
ha ha ha andre nel is such a tit and he deserved that
Zygoit 1 year ago
@canyouflyican my grand grand father is from india ...i live in trinidad ! it would be nice to see them
stephon77indtri 1 year ago
400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, constituting 99% of the total population of Hindus living in Muslim majority area of the Kashmir Valley, were forcibly pushed out of the Valley by Muslim terrorists, trained in Pakistan, since the end of 1989.
This is not human rights abuses I guess. Its funny how Pakistanis always see one side of the equation. I don't know if it is a part of your genetic make-up or it is an acquired trait that comes from hanging out those of your ilk.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
"Its funny how Pakistanis always see one side of the equation"
well at the end of the day they chose to leave, they were not ordered at gun point.
and as mentioned previously, you interfered with bangladesh so why cry when others do it to you?
part of our genetic make up? LMAO
maybe having blind faith is an indian trait, whether its genetic i would highly doubt. you dont like to hear the truth, carry on watching ndtv news, lol
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
but India interfered with Bangladesh not in isolation. There were tens of millions of Bangaldeshi refugees who were pouring into India due to the massacre by the Pakistani Army. Why should India bear the brunt of security risk and dealing with millions of refugees?
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
what you seem to be missing is that india hugely interfered, they helped the bengali, trained them etc...
you should know all that, it wasnt a simple case of "security risk" so drop the BS there mate.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
That is not interference. Pakistan is separated from Bangladesh by Indian territory. It is logistically impossible to stay out of any conflict in such a case. India became involved only at the point where Bangladesh was a gone case for Pakistan. There may have been some covert intelligence support but it was too late in the timeline. Pakistan lost Bangladesh in 1967-68 itself. India got involved only after the Pak Army started massacring.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
you wrote "HR abuses are collateral effects in war zones"
so going by your "wise" words there, the 400,000 pundits who left kashmir are also included in that?
seeing kashmir is a "semi-war zone" according to you then the 400,000 who left are just part of the process too?
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
anyway dude, i am going out for a while, would you believe to a post diwali party at a friends house.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Awesome! Happy Diwali Mate! don't get into any Indo-Pak debates there :) Let history be bygone and lets focus on the future
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
rather than hold your hand up and say "yes there are many human rights abuses committed by the indian military" etc you would rather dodge the issue,
lmao, have some honesty and integrity, you dont become weak by admitting fault. lol
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Dude most Indians admit that there are himan rights abuse. We do not run away from reality and we do not create propaganda websites. But these abuses don't occur in isolation. These are semi-war zones, you think the islamic terrorists don't create abuses - the biggest evidence being the migration of millions of Hindus from the Kashmir. Try going to Pashtun websites and see how your Army is being accused of human rights abuses. HR abuses are collateral effects in war zones.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZaiidHamid
lol@you think the islamic terrorists don't create abuses?
of course i know they do, some it appalling, do i hide from it and say no they dont? of course not.
ok, so i understand what you're getting at, its a "semi-warzone" so anything goes? lol
so now, 400,000 has become "the biggest evidence being the migration of millions of Hindus from the Kashmir"
which is it? millions or 400,000. there is quite a difference between the two.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
Wikipedia's qualifier at the beginning of the article This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
This article needs additional citations for verification.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
english and like english only do these thins
TheAnticonspiracy 1 year ago
india won the match
shaikeleyas 1 year ago 26
hijra
OccultTruth 1 year ago
that is what the replai frm an india.......lolZzzz ne;
imranmohammed20 1 year ago
nel-show me d heart which u dont have
sree-i ll show u it in the next ball
gggkkklllzzz 1 year ago
lmao!!! I wont get bored of this any time!!! so much fun to watch sree santh at his best xD
sairamsridharaa 1 year ago
This is why i love cricket. Check out Nel's reaction after the 6 he is trying to contain his laughter it's great. I myself am indian and not so much a fan of sreesanth but this was too funny. Good cricket all round.
Lefferable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck you all indians
imkashifmalik4all 1 year ago
nel is good bowler...this was just a tecknique to bloody sreesnath
imkashifmalik4all 1 year ago
i am a pakistani .... bt i can say that indian rokxxx....they are great...and we should not forgot that we are made from india.... they had always helped us... politicaly and financialy.... i love pakistan as well as india....:)
gagan1523 1 year ago
@gagan1523 i am a srilankan i can say that da one who made this comment is definitely an indian. obvious... lol
docdj1988 1 year ago
@docdj1988
that show ur mentality
gagan1523 1 year ago
@gagan1523 dats da bitter truth :-p
docdj1988 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gagan1523 i am a srilankan i can say that da one who made this comment is definitely an indian. obvious... lol
docdj1988 1 year ago
@gagan1523
you are Pakistani? LMAO
u fucking rundiaan indian bhangees will do anything, nothing is too low for you mother fuckers.
india helped Pak? how?
fucking kafir mother fuckers.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint the fuckin pakistani mother fuck.... u blody ass hole ...u dont knw india gave pakistan $100 million during the flood which came in pakistan this year..... u r a bloddy dickhead.... sooo sooooooo poor country...with a litrecy rate of 48%.... hahahhahaha
shame on u people.... paki bastards ,,,, katua...
gagan1523 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
You bastards are used to walking around with a beggar's bowl around western nations. Pakistan is a whore of a nation and its illegitimate terrorist offspring with the west are slapping it today across its face with their cocks.
DSHK45 1 year ago
@DSHK45
haramzaaday behan chod, us with the begging bowl? DOES INDIA STILL NOT RECEIVE AID?
has india not been begging for aid for decades? lol
you have more starving fucks in rundia than the whole of sub saharan africa, around 350million, lol
but oh no, you guys are a super power, super power in hunger stakes.
if your feeble mind can be influenced so easily as to make all muslims seem bad, so be it. who gives a fuck you piss drinking cunt?
madar chod bhangee
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Of course not. India receives very little aid and it dosen't care for any aid because it's too piddly. I think the western nations give it because it makes them feel good about themselves. But really the aid itself is inconsequential and is actually counter-productive because it comes with a lot of terms and conditions. Not worth the trouble for $10-15 million. I believe India had even refused aid for the same reasons a few years back.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Pakistan actually receives substantial foreign aid. I mean the economy is pretty much dependant on foreign aid. Take away a couple of billion and the economy can come crashing down. Until a couple of years back, Pakistan was on the verge of defaulting - thankfully for Pakistan, 9/11 happened and it got a few billions from the US.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
Sunday, 20 January 2008, 19:00 GMT BBC
Brown announces India aid package
Gordon Brown has announced a new package of development aid for India, worth £825m over the next three years.
Mr "Zaiid" or should i say Sanjay, at least try to be honest with your postings, no one mentioned 10-15 million, we are talking about major aid here.
Has india not been the recipient of foriegn aid for decades?
Do you think the US aid to Pak doesnt have conditions attached?
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
£800m over a period of 3 years!! When you compare it to the size of India's economy at $2 trillion, its like throwing a matchstick into the Sun. You are mistaken. Right through the 70's through 80's, India lived under virtual economic isolation with sanctions from the US, leave aside foreign aid. India's foreign aid per capita is $1.7 Compare this to Pakistan at $8.70.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
I am mistaken? how am i mistaken? it was on the bbc news website, are you calling that a fake report? ok tell me one thing then, if india really has no need for a pittance amount like 800m (according to you) why do they accept?
has india not been the largest recipient of aid from the UK in a historical context?
if so why? they have actually needed that money.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
You are mistaken when you say India received a lot of aid. India may have been the largest recipient of UK aid NOT EQUAL TO India received a lot of aid. The fact is when you look at foreign aid, you have to compare it relative to the size of the economy. India's foreign aid per capita is $1.7 Compare this to Pakistan at $8.70 - which means on average a Pakistani citizen received 5 times more aid. I am not even going into the composition of aid, which was also unfavorable to India.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
Germany to stop development aid to China, India
Fri, Oct 30, 2009
AFP
Germany, the world's second largest provider of development aid after the United States, gave 67.5 million euros (97.4 million dollars) in aid to China in 2007 and 84 million euros to India in 2008, according to its most recent report.
Pak does receive large amounts of aid, no one is denying that Sanjay but how quickly you indians forget you too were in the same situation.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Not to mention the composition of foreign aid. 90-95% of India's foreign aid is in the form of soft loans - money returned back to the donor. Pakistan on the other hand receives virtual grants in the form of military assistance, much of which is diverted against India - something acknowledged by their own leader. Almost their entire defense budget is financed by aid - money not returned.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
if you were Pakistani would you not direct the money against india?
its not like india are a brotherly nation with good intentions is it?
i would direct it all towards india and their evil intentions. no matter how much india spends on its defence industry the nuclear weapons are a leveller, mutually assured destruction.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Brotherly intentions? Why in the world would India have brotherly intentions towards a pesty and hostile neighbor? Did India start Kargil? Did India create organized terrorist groups such as LeT and JeM? Even so, whether you want to divert money is a sovereign decision, as long as it pays the consequences in terms of reduced or no future foreign aid and insulting humiliating treatment from the rest of the world.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
india may have not started the kargil war, but did it interfere with the creation of bangladesh?
did it not totally immerse itself with the conflict yet cries when Pakistan helps out in Kashmir. You cant have it both ways.
Humiliating treatment from the rest of the world? were you blind a few weeks ago regarding india and the CWG, did you see the coverage by the west?
as rich as india may think it is, it's still seen as a 3rd world country.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Have you ever asked this question to the Pakistani Army as to how it treated its Bangladeshi citizens? Bangladesh was a gone case before India even entered the war. Stop blaming India for it.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
LMAO@ "Have you ever asked this question to the Pakistani Army as to how it treated its Bangladeshi citizens?"
you done the same to the indian army for their abuse in Kashmir? are they held accountable?
at the end of the day YOU guys did interfere so give it a rest with "stop blaming india" routine.
You interfered and have no right to get angry when Pak reciprocates.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
There is a difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh. Kashmir is a disputed territory and was a peaceful territitory - until Pakistan started sending terrorists to kill civilians. Bangladesh was always a part of Pakistan but your Punjabis treat every other community as crap whether they are Bengalis, Sindhis, Balochs's or Pashtuns. And you paid the price for it.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
we paid the price for it? LOL
Bangladesh was always a part of Pakistan? what a whole 20+ years? that long? lol
so at least you have the good grace to admit that Kashmir is a disputed territory.
Pakistan started sending in terrorists to kill civilians? is that indian media's take on it?
I also recall when Clinton visited india a large number of kashmiri sikhs were murdered, that was also blamed on Pak.
later it came out it was actually the involvement of the indian army.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
No infact it was proven otherwise. That it was the Pakistani sponsored terrorists who killed 36 Sikhs in daylight murder. I think if "proven" means in Pakistani, then yeah - proven. Its funny how everything is "proven" immediately to you when something is favorable to you, Yet not even tons of proof about your cheating cricketers is not enough as proof - you talk about "innocent until proven guilty". Its all good, all conveneient.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid The authors of the report, Justice (Retd) Ajit Singh Bains, and Justice (Retd) Justice (Retd) Inderjit Singh Jaijee and Lt.-Gen. (Retd) Kartar Singh Gill, conclude that the Indian government's counterinsurgency forces, which are run by the Indian intelligence service, RAW, are responsible for the massacre of Chatti Singhpora.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
I already know India is a poor country, but poorer so than Pakistan. But poverty is far less a crime than losing your self-respect, which Pakistan has time and again faced over the years. Can you imagine a head of state being told by a third rate American official that "We will bomb you back to the Stone Age". OR the Americans routinely firing drones into Pakistani territory with no respect for Pakistani sovereignty or the aid it begs for.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
and you think the americans would not say the same thing to you guys if needed? dont make me laugh.
The drones being fired are generally fired into an unofficial border, a porous border. Are they fired without the know how of the Pak army? No way.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Let the Americans even try saying it. lol. India is no Pakistan and they know it. And the world knows it. That is why they altered their Constitution to accommodate the Indian nuclear deal. It would be laughable to even think about something like that in pakistan's case.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
its laughable indeed, what makes it even funnier is that you indians think the americans respect you etc...
the americans have known for a long time that their military hard ware has one end point which is india,
you guys also know that but still you think "america is our friend" lol
wake up and smell the coffee.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
read
Education aid siphoned off by Indian bureaucracy
18th June 2010
By Ishpreet Bindra
Following reports of possible misuse of millions of pounds extended to India as educational aid by the United Kingdom, Britain has launched an enquiry into the matter. The funds were meant for the 'Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan', to help poor children get a decent education. It is, however, believed that the money never reached the deserving and is suspected to have been gobbled up by the corruption demons.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Lol. You are telling me things I already know. Diversion due to corruption happens in all countries, including Pakistan, which has a corruption ranking of 143 compared to India's 87 - so the less said the better. The diversion of foreign military aid in Pakistan is unique to Pakistan in both scale and frequency. Pakistan's diversion of military aid is done as a policy, not due to corruption, which probably happens even more in Pakistan.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
Pankaj Mishra
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 28 July 2010 20.00 BST
According to the latest measure of the United Nations Development Programme, which includes such indicators of deprivation as education and health, just eight Indian states have more poor people – 421 million – than the 28 poorest countries of Africa. In fact, undernutrition in India is twice as high as that in sub-Saharan Africa, with nearly half of India's 120 million children exposed to early death.
Incredible.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
What are you telling me here? I already know India is a poor country.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Until as recently in 2009, no one had a clue where US aid to Pakistan went. They had conditions attached to the aid, but there were no checks and balances as to ensure whether the conditions were actually followed. The fact is India's growth is largely self-driven right from the 60's through today. Pakistan, on the other hand, holds a gun to the world's head and says "We have N-weapons. Give me money, else I go down and I take you down with me".
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
you are incorrect,
India did receive quite a lot of aid, especially from the US during the 50's and 60's but that was curtailed during the 70's when india aligned itself with the commies.
Pakistan does not hold a gun as you so put with blackmail of the n-weapons, maybe in your indian media you would like to perpetuate that sort of rumour. Pak has spent a lot of money with the on going "war on terror" and should be reimbursed fully for that.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Whether India received less aid because of siding with the commies or testing a N-bomb is pointless. Either way India, as it stands today, stands on its own feet with little assistance from the West or anyone else. In the early 50's, India received some food aid from the US, but if you're comparing it at the scale of the hard cash assistance that Pakistan has received since the 80's, it is laughable.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
maybe today according to you india "stands on its own 2 feet" but the bigger picture does not reinforce that opinion.
How would you define "standing on your own 2 feet" ? being totally self reliant? no more extreme poverty?
India has received a lot of aid since the 50's, whether you accept that fact (or not) is your choice.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
We both know that the next war between india and Pak will be the decider, nukes will be used by both.
I am not a fan of war or destruction but when push comes to shove india will get everything it deserves.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
I agree with you. The next war will be the decider. Actually the next terrorist attack will be the decider. And if Pakistani footprints are found again like in 26/11, then India will attack, N-war or no N-war.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
It is not a matter of my choice. Foreign aid matters only if it has an impact. In India's case, it is meant only to make the foreigners make good about themselves, not to provide genuine assistance. Had India not received any piddly foreign aid, not one thing would have changed today. Literally not one thing.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
Times of India: Oct 2010
NEW DELHI: Believe it or not when it comes to gender inequities India fares worse than Pakistan. In fact, the country fares lower than all other countries in South Asia save Afghanistan. These are the findings of the 2010 Human Development Report released by the United Nations Development Programme on Thursday as per its Gender Inequality Index.
and that is what you guys are so proud of? starving people?
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Dude you are taking selective indicators that suit you. Don't make me start pulling up statistics as a whole. You have to look it as a whole. Because barriing a couple, Pakistan is worse off on almost every other indicator - whether it is literacy, fertility rates, education, health, GDP per capita. India is generattions ahead of Pakistan.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
hang on a minute, I am the one pulling off selective indicators?
was it not you who so happily started with the corruption index?
so now when faced with other suitable indicators (not random ones) you are complaining.
india will be higher in terms of gdp, literacy etc but I would highly doubt that you guys are a lot ahead.
as for stating that india is generations ahead??? LMAO
yes yes, i am sure you are which is why you have so many starving.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
I only used the corruption index because you were trying to highlight diverting foreign money due to corruption. I said that happens in all countries - more so in Pakistan because there is more corruption, hence the index. If you want to get into a India v/s Pakistan debate - Who is more poor? I am more than willing.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
India is obviously poorer, you cannot have hundreds of millions starving, more so than the whole of sub-saharan Africa and claim to think your country is strong and independent.
Do you base the sucess of a nation by the money in the bank or the food on peoples tables?
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Dude you need an Economics Course. If India has a large number of poor people, it is because India is bigger. Take a look at the World Human development Ranking of Pakistan. I believe in 2010 it is
India: 119
Pakistan 125
This is a cumulative index based on education, health, literacy etc. India is poor. Pakistan is poorer.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
Rep. Edolphuis Towns speaking in the House said a probe ordered by two groups, the Punjab Human Rights Organisation and the Movement Against State Repression, and conducted by two retired judges and a retired army general have "clearly and unambiguously found the blame for massacre of Sikhs of village Chatti Singhpora lay on Indian government and not Pakistan or the Kashmiri militants as alleged by India.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Can you quote the sources of your links? Punjab Human Rights Group. Such an obvious Pakistani propagandist name. lol. Give me all your sources and links and references.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
of course i can give you the source, just copy and paste the paragraph into google and it will give you the website, it doesnt allow me to post a link.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Some human rights organizations have also expressed doubt about the veracity of these admissions. Independent inquiries by human rights activists from Punjab and the Ludhiana-based International Human Rights Organization have found that it is unlikely that the attacks were carried out by Indian security forces themselves, and that the perpetrators were most likely renegades.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
also read it on wikipedia, Madeleine Albright also wrote in her book "the mighty and almighty" about how hindu extremists orchestrated the massacre,
open your eyes. You seem to be deluding yoursef if you think that india has not committed human rights abuses.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Page xi of the Mighty and the Almighty contains a reference to Hindu militants that will be deleted in subsequent printings, both in America and in international editions. This error was due to a failure in the fact-checking process.
Nice try.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
lmao@ nice try!
the "error" was removed because of indians crying about it, lol.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Well that is your perception. Policies are made on hard facts and investigated evidence, not the opinions and whims of youtube posters
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
You know these events happened pre 9/11 when the western world had not woken up to the propagandist attitude of the Islamic terrorists. I think post 9/11 it has smartened up to the propaganda that happens in Islamic countries against Hindu, Jew, Amrikans. These things don't sell anymore. You gotta find new frontiers to win. Lies don't work anymore
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Human rights abuses?? Yeah maybe these are not abuses
Thirty five Hindus were killed in recent days in two separate incidents in the Indian-administered portion of the disputed Kashmir province, the police said.
The killings were believed to be handiwork of Islamist militants just days before a scheduled meeting between the Indian prime minister and Kashmiri separatists.
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
OH MY GOD!
the difference between india and Pak is HUUUGE
seeing you guys claim to be a Economic power house its laughable.
India is poorer.
Your mind is set, no use debating with you as your blind.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
How is India poorer if India is 119 and Pakistan is 125? I think you have decided in your head that India thinks of itself an economic powerhouse. Well actually it is in the sense that it is a bigger economy and has more say in world economics. The answer is Yes - because of its size. I think you are confusing poverty with the term "economic powerhouse". Once again - India is poor nbut Pakistan is poorer. Based on the same source that you used to highlight your gender equality quote
ZaiidHamid 1 year ago
@ZaiidHamid
LMAO@ "Foreign aid matters only if it has an impact. In India's case, it is meant only to make the foreigners make good about themselves"
YES YES, i am sure that is why india accepts it with open hands.
I highly doubt that India will go to war when (and not IF) there is another attack in india, you guys jump up and down a lot but nothing more than that. Your media is hysterical in its coverage, jingoistic to the maximum.
SufiSaint 1 year ago
@SufiSaint
Btw, you are no Sufi you illiterate bastard. Pull your head out of your ass and swallow your false pride. It is stupid maderchodhs like you who make all Pakis and Muslims look bad.
DSHK45 1 year ago
Nel said "show me the heart", and in reply shre gave it all ..lol
TheYashu200 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
indians bhenchod k bache tum logon ki bhagwan ki kali kus maron ahahahahahah
Khaumkbdj 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Khaumkbdj teri maa ki choot
sadire08 1 year ago
nel sucx
veerdivam 1 year ago
Everybody is laughing ! Some entertainment in long boring five day cricket !
serpent7700 1 year ago
what a fukin hindu twat, nearli fukin had a heart attack madarchod bhagwan ka lun mayuda harami.
786Sliktingz 1 year ago
Jab HINDUSTAN nae Porkistan ki randi maa ko choda tha, tab Pakis paida hue the. Chhinaal Ki aulaad Pakistan, Mere jhaant ka baal Pakistan...
anuvishalpandit 1 year ago 8
Nel said the heart. Sreesanth played from it.
Abziifier 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
madarchooooodd Sreeesanth FUCK U teriii maa ko choodo randi ki aulaad bharwa sallaa I AM A TRUE PAKISTANI and we alllllllllllllll hate india sooo much so FUCK so madarchood sreeeesaanthh sala ganda bharwaa indian MADARCHOOODD fuck india FUCK sreeesant's sister and mother hahahah GAY HIND FUCK INDIA
rhummayuna 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rhummayuna Dude seiously get a life
rahulshroff1986 1 year ago
sreesanth showed nel who's the boss.
mrperfect88imtheone 1 year ago
inn k khilaaf to hum indo paki aik hein ..... good one sreesanth from japan
a pakistani
japan1ban1 1 year ago
well answer given by shreesant its great nd d real power of indian .............dont tease us
abhitesh222 1 year ago
The most pathetic and over hyped bowler with the biggest of mouths - that's Andre Nel for you. It's strange that he was seldom punished for his headless antics.
tgugdevil 1 year ago
im english and i tell ya sreesanth is one of my fave players now :) i have always been a fan of him and rp i hope they both get back into the indian side
whitebaron666 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ganeshas127 1 year ago
Battle of the basket-cases
crajagop1407 1 year ago
he showed no heart at all any fool can back away and have a slog for six
It shows heart when your a tailender and put some value on your wicket and get in behind the ball
IndiaRshit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
manojfrance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
manojfrance 1 year ago
"Show me the heart" that's what Nel said, and to be honest Sreesanth did the best thing anyone who has self respect could have done ever!!! I would add something, he should have hit Nel's ass with his bat!!! Nel will never ever abuse anyone in his life!!!
manojfrance 1 year ago
did u see nel's face???
LOL
ChIragg05 1 year ago
from 1.05 to 1.10, u cud hear laughter , really awesome
edwinkimberly 1 year ago
@attractive
madarchod we start with a capital letter not an alphabet makebhosade
rishabh47 1 year ago
Diffilcult to know which one is the bigger tit, really.
SettingSun77 1 year ago
Ravi Shastri is the best commentator India got
gpp2006 1 year ago
both are jerks
mkhan888 1 year ago
The reaction from the commentators is hilarious. I have been searching for this video and instead I kept finding the one with Harsha Bhogle.
gustav234 1 year ago
hahah nice !!! sreesanth is it too agressive but if he controls his agression in to bowling well then he is an excellent bowler
amaljohn 2 years ago 7
I hate both of them, but Nel got what he deserved. LOL
MainManAus 2 years ago 5
these motherfuckers pakis don't have any sense saalon jaake pehle injamam ki english correct karo behnchodon
MegaDeepanker 2 years ago
bloody dick head, what does this movie has to do with us, bhaincood gandu, had main rah, bhain kay tukkay
dredgeq3 2 years ago
What happened next?
ashliski 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
TERRIBLE COMMENTARY....utter bias. Andre Nel was a good natured player, absolutely bonkers on the field but really effective and a nice fellow off it. Of course u expect bias from the Indian comms but what really sucks is 0:26. Leave ur personal opinions to urself
1137moiz 2 years ago
Sreesanth.
tomberra 2 years ago 5
Pwnt.
aussie4life05 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow indian comentator forgot to tell the truth on mic. tha sreesanth is nadu and doesnt speak or understand english so forget argue. hahaah. and wata fagg sreesanth is. shaking asss on ground he should b in some where delhi selling ass and shakin for arabs.not in cricket bollywood jerk
afridi10 2 years ago
wow. you know evrything.
You probably're right. Srisanth may be like mot of the Pakistani cricketers, who're uneducated and can't speak on undertsnad English.
But I really doubted Srisanth doesn't know English lanuage..
atel97 2 years ago
afridi10,
You soundz pity frustrated Faggot. I bet Srisanth sold your mother's ass for a night in Delhi.
Get a life cocksucking moron!!
googer007 2 years ago
hey idiot.. he is a Commerce Graduate.
and in India, English is the medium of instruction. do u know what that means ?
pradeepanisonline 2 years ago 3
So much English as your medium that you don't know that after a "full stop" you start the word of the first sentence with a capital alphabet. LOL, where do you curry cunts get so much agression from?
attractivue 1 year ago
@attractivue Hmmm...did you forget a question mark sir?
canyouflyican 1 year ago
Two dickheads, one video
MTrulez 2 years ago 3
lol, I laughed as much reading ur comment as I did when I saw this vid.
pradeepanisonline 2 years ago
@MTrulez Rightly said!
canyouflyican 1 year ago
jhahahahahahaha. ... lol ...
Nel got some medicine of his own ^^
tupac22888 2 years ago 2
hahaha this video was definitely worth watching. 5 stars
shek666 2 years ago 2
Two dumb idiots in one!
IshakNicky 2 years ago
Owned.
omnibusim 2 years ago 2
i thinks sirshant didnt understanded
strpk5304 2 years ago
dat was slap on nel's face...
red6dead7revolver 2 years ago 6
Im Pakistani and I have to say that it was nicely done by Sreesanth.
Muneeb911 2 years ago 46
This has been flagged as spam show
@Muneeb911 hey dude...y do u have to say that " i m a pakistani and I have to say that it was nicely done by Sreesanth". are people from pakistan are not suppose to praise and like an indian player....dont spoil the spirit dude....its fine if u do that...u can like any player.....live cricket and enjoy it !
MrSudu87 1 year ago
@Muneeb911 Sahi bola hey bhai...Hum Desi Gorro Ki dajjiya udayenge !!!
srinivasreddymrec 1 year ago