When someone disables ratings, it strongly suggests, that they know they're in the wrong, or at least very unpopular. It shows that they believe they have a better chance of spreading their video if people aren't allowed give their opinion of it. Very telling. Censorship is not a valid form of argument.
@kyebean or they are just sick of people censoring them and what they have to say thru the video by giving a negative vote before even listening to the argument. It works both ways man.
@illegaluploads that's not a reason to disable ratings. If your viewers don't like what your doing, make better videos. I guess that doesn't matter when you don't care what's true and you're just trying to evangelize.
@MCulpa I assume that's one of those pointless debates where each participant can prattle on pompously for like 10 minutes going over about 50 different points before their opponent can contest anything?
Similar to his paper on self-deception. The unbeliever believes he does not believe in God, because God has not provided sufficient evidence. But this shows he really does believe in God.
Funny, the atheist's comments sharply declined this far into the series.
bengphoenix 1 year ago
When someone disables ratings, it strongly suggests, that they know they're in the wrong, or at least very unpopular. It shows that they believe they have a better chance of spreading their video if people aren't allowed give their opinion of it. Very telling. Censorship is not a valid form of argument.
kyebean 2 years ago
@kyebean or they are just sick of people censoring them and what they have to say thru the video by giving a negative vote before even listening to the argument. It works both ways man.
illegaluploads 3 months ago
@illegaluploads that's not a reason to disable ratings. If your viewers don't like what your doing, make better videos. I guess that doesn't matter when you don't care what's true and you're just trying to evangelize.
kyebean 3 months ago
@kyebean
You could just look at the bahnsen vs stein debate. That actually does have ratings enabled :D
MCulpa 1 month ago
@MCulpa I assume that's one of those pointless debates where each participant can prattle on pompously for like 10 minutes going over about 50 different points before their opponent can contest anything?
kyebean 1 month ago
great teaching
darpachief 2 years ago
Kind of scary.. He needs to stress the condition of being decieved (which would mean ignorance of God).
MRKetter81 2 years ago
Very useful.
fiercegallantry 3 years ago
Similar to his paper on self-deception. The unbeliever believes he does not believe in God, because God has not provided sufficient evidence. But this shows he really does believe in God.
CAndiron 4 years ago