Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”
The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.
Apparently Jews can have a country where they are the majority and set the cultural standard. So can Indians, Arabs, Africans, Japanese and Chinese. But Europeans cannot.
You can call it multiculturalism, you can call it diversity, you can call it tolerance, you can call it whatever you want. But It is, in fact, deliberate, demographic, genocide.
Children do notice skin color just as they notice BEAUTY or HEIGHT. However, RACISM or homophobia is NOT INNATE.
Judging others just because of the way they look is LEARNED.
PEOPLE who grow up constantly surrounded by a close community with same culture, same language but different races see everyone as EQUAL. Judging someone based on color is the furthest thing in their minds.
I know it because my family 200+ people, my friends and I grew up in a BIG METROPOLITAN AREA. SO THERE!
THE REASON THEY PICK people of their own race is because, most children from the Suburbs only play with children of their own RACE. Some goes with black children, or Asian or Mexican. Places in America are separated (segregated) by race.
I grew up in a wealthy place very mix with EVERYTHING. ME AND MY FRIENDS LOVE EACH OTHER DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE LOOK LIKE THE UNITED NATIONS. Those are my brothers and sisters no matter what. I am German, Italian, Spanish and Venezuelan. Buyaaa
I'm a little surprised that they didn't use the kids trying to categorize the cards by sex as proof that babies are also sexist.
Although this guy does scare me a little. I've seen his image parodies so many times without knowing that there was an original image. I wonder if he considers me some kind of "ist" for thinking that.
@Whatdipisit The liberal media are for the liberal intelligent. Yes, its true...the stupid fight or flight people who think on very base levels can't fight nature. Some intelligent humans can.
@Whatdipisit I am 34 with a degree. I have been employed for 7 years at a Fort. 500. Thanks and have a nice day with your human nature while the rest of us who think remain civil.
racism is an innate propensity in all people this is very true but, that does by no means condone it. All this gives evidence of mankinds primordial past in respect to survival tactics in assuring a persons cultural genetic identity (CGI) across the spectrum of variation and genetic continuity over a cycle of generations. social conditioning and cultural shaping also contribute to the (CGI) paradigm.
Racism is not learned behaviour. Non-racism is a taught behaviour. People express it expecting to receive praise for doing so and the sad part is they continue to receive it not just in their first classes as five year olds where it may be useful, they continue to get it as professors, but no evidence is ever required. People with evidence are suspect. Why would anybody want evidence about something which is officially true?
Racism is not innate, because "race" is not biologically or genetically definable. "race" was invented to justify slavery. Saying that racism is in some way instinct or natural is as ridiculous because "race" doesn't didn't exist in the first place.
sadly racism is an inate tendency and not a learned behaviour as so many psychologists have taught over the years. people will always notice diffrences among people not only on the basis of colour but, clothing,language, gender, and nationality as well this is intrinsic in human nature and is like some sort of tribal mentality any person who is not part of my particular tribe or culture is excluded from it and considered the lesser other. the real enigma are those people who arent racist at all.
@Lrdvltr people who promote "race" as biologically or genetically identifiable or classifiable are "racists". In fact, "race" is a myth according to the human genome project.
@checkyoursources yea thats been disproven a few years back. But first off race isn't one gene it's a cluster of genes within populations. You can actually determine someones race via a DNA test.
@kubaniski You cannot determine someone's "race" from a DNA test, you are simply artifically creating a discontinuous group from continuous human variation. Who decides which clusters mean you belong to a particular "race", its subjective,not objective. "race" is a biological and genetic myth as stated by the human genome project. There are 7 billion genetically unique individuals, not "races". gene flow in humans never ceased.;
@checkyoursources Yes you can biologists do it all the time especially inc rime labs. By comparing genetic markers within separate populations you can get a pretty good idea of human genetic movements. Yes all people are genetically unique but thats true for any living thing, but populations differ (it's called a subspecies) .
@kubaniski Nope, the human genome project (the most comprehensive study of human genomes) found no evidence whatsover for the existence of human subspecies in modern humans. We simply haven't had a long enough period of time where genes didn't flow across the entire human population.
@checkyoursources yes they did say that, and then a few years later they retracted that statement. i belive your using old information. This was explained to using my collage bio class last semester. Biologists can determine race via DNA (look it up), they can also determine the race of a persons remains by looking at the skull structure and proportions of limbs, and by other characteristics.
@checkyoursources well yes of course european genes exist in africa. Hell my girlfriend is a white south african, colonialism has spread Europeans and their genes all over the world.
@kubaniski Nope you misunderstood, Humans originated in Africa, the founder population was there. Even if you don't include South Africans who recently moved from Europe you still find 100% of genetic variation within Africa. There is no such thing as a "european" gene or genes.
@checkyoursources no actually certain genes developed in populations after people left Africa, gene mutations continue to occur to this day. Certain gene mutations such as pale skin and slanty eyes developed in populations outside of Africa. Yes 99% of human DNA is the same but then again a single gene sequence drastically changes the appearance of an individual and then can spread to the larger population. Evolution takes place over millions of years and in tiny steps.
@kubaniski 100% of genetic variation on the planet can be found in Africa,it decreases the further you go away from Africa (see founder effect). Saying that % frequency defines a group is using artificial subjective categorisation because humans exist along a continuous range of variation. Modern human only evolved 200,000 years ago so we haven't had time for new alleles to evolve but we have lost some in environmentally varied areas. Read Long and Kittles 2003
@checkyoursources people are being born with new alleles all the time, alleles such as eye color are a product of genetic divergence. There are plenty of genes which are common among mongoloids which are not present in other populations. Some genetic conditions such as tay-sacs are found in very small populations of Norther Europeans.
@checkyoursources It is more accurate to classify humans into 'breeds', as with all other animals. Race is something inaccurate and outdated. There are slight genetic differences between various ethnic groups which manifest themselves in various ways. Some populations are more likely to have certain genetic diseases or certain physical attributes than others. Phenotypes such as skin colour have nothing to do with it.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Nope, Modern Humans have only existed for around 100-200 thousand years, nowhere near long enough for subspecies to evolve. In addition gene flow has never ceased in the human population. There are genetic differences between all human individuals. In fact there are 7 billion different genetic individuals, not "races". Any grouping of such individuality and continuous variation is artificial and subjective.
@checkyoursources No one is talking about subspecies. I am talking about subtle genetic differences which are not large enough to cause speciation, but they are the beginning of that process. Many individuals tend to share some common characteristics with certain other individuals but not everybody.
@joseffritzlismydaddy You earlier claimed that there are "races". There is no "black gene" or "white gene" so how is your point relevant but to describe continuous varuation which i have already explained to you.
As stated, gene flow has never ceased in humans, there are differences, byt those are predominantly among individuals, not subjective "groups".
@checkyoursources I have claimed no such thing. You clearly have misread. I said it was more accurate to classify people into breeds. I specifically said that phenotypes such as skin colour have nothing to do with anything and are unimportant. It was quite easy to understand. Geneflow never ceased but you cannot deny that specific 'breeds' of humans might have certain characteristics that other don't have due to various selection factors.
@joseffritzlismydaddy People don't fit into "breeds" anymore than they fit into distinct biological or genetic "races. Humans show continuous genetic variation.
@checkyoursources Yes they do. Populations that have lived for centuries in Ethiopia make excellent runners and might be vulnerable to specific diseases for very good reasons. A baby of two Ethiopian highlanders being born in France will still not prevent it from becoming an excellent runner like its parents. Face it, if we have no problems with associating dogs with breeds, then we shouldn't have problems doing the same for humans who are animals too.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Nope, you have switched from "race" to region and you are repeating myths perpertuated by racists and those who continue to promote the myth of genetic or biological races despite the Human genome project findings. Altitude and training correlates better with running performance than nationality or genetic factors.
You can find the tallest and shortest people on Earth in Africa.
@checkyoursources No this has nothing to do with the old concept of race. That was utter rubbish, take an Askenazim Jewish baby and raise it in Ethiopia. Then see whether it still manages to out run the original ethiopians
@joseffritzlismydaddy Sickle cell anaemia is found on every continent on the planet, tay sacs is found in many regions too. Neither indentify so called "race" nor are they unique to any "race".
@checkyoursources Sickle cell anaemia is found were ever there are specific populations, the continent they migrated to is irrelevant. No it is not found on every continent either. Tay sacs is quite common in Ashkenazim populations but not Aborigine populations. Certain populations are far more predisposed to inheriting it because of evolution. You didn't answer my question, do you have sickle cell anaemia in your family?
@joseffritzlismydaddy The gene variant for sickle cell disease is related to malaria, not skin colour or "race". Malaria until recently was found on every continent bar Antarctica. An allele being more common in one region describes continuous variation not "race".I do not know the genetic history of my family. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
@checkyoursources I am aware of that but it doesn't exclude the fact that specific breeds are for more suited to living in places were there is malaria better than others. I was not talking about race either. You cannot deny that there are specific genetic differences between different groups of people because of evolution. I don't know of any edges I might have, I know I am genetically similar certain people more than others and that I have the same predisposition to certain things.
@joseffritzlismydaddy There are individual differences and these are greater than any so called "racial" differences. Are you admitting that there are no biological or genetic races yet?
@checkyoursources Not necessarily, I am not talking about races either. Why are Ashkenazim Jews over represented in universities but not in athletics?
@checkyoursources Depends on which populations. I'm talking about population groups not races. Why are certain diseases prevalent in specific populations but not others, even if they were to migrate to other countries?
@joseffritzlismydaddy But the discussion was about "races". If an allele is more common is one area it is simply continuous variation. Neither sickle cell or tay sachs are unique to any one population. They work on a clinal range.
@checkyoursources The fact is that they are found in specific populations but not others. Sickle cell anaemia is the result of a particular population or breed's adaptation to living with the malaria parasite. Another foreign population with no defence against it will have to evolve its own, unless it interbreeds with populations that do have a biological defence.
@joseffritzlismydaddy You have shifted from saying "races/breeds" exist in humans (which i strongly disagree with based on the evidence) to talking about specific alleles having earlier admitted than there is no single gene or allele that identifies your concept of "race/breed". Keep on topic.
@checkyoursources I am staying on topic, your definition of what constitutes a race is different to mine. The evidence is in my favour. As regards the alleles, that is also bollocks. There are a number of HLA antigens that are specific to certain ethnic groups and people descended from them but not others. Again you haven't told me why Aborigines don't suffer from Tay sacs if there is no genetic difference between ethnicities
@joseffritzlismydaddy Maybe you are confusing ancestry and "race". Explain how the human genome is in your favour when it states that there is no evidence of human subspecies or "races" in modern humans? Diversity of HLA (not HLA antigens, the "A" stands for antigen) in humans is related to disease defense, and the chance of two individuals having identical HLA molecules on all loci is very low i.e. you are actually providing evidence with HLA that there are 7 billion individuals. not races.
@checkyoursources I really meant to write alleles there not antigens. The human genome has also reveled subtle differences between various populations. Tests on several specific HLA alleles demonstrate that their function varies according to ethnic group. It has been found that certain HLA alleles seem to offer protection against infection by certain viruses in people of specific ethnic backgrounds but not in others.
@checkyoursources 'Race' has quite a lot do with ancestry, the original word for race actually also implied ancestry. Your ancestry determines a lot of things and makes you more genetically similar to certain individuals but not others. It also plays a crucial part in whether a graft your body receives is a success. Phenotypes such as skin colour are meaningless.
@joseffritzlismydaddy As stated Diversity of HLA in humans is related to disease defense, and the chance of two individuals having IDENTICAL HLA molecules on all loci is very low i.e. you are actually providing evidence with HLA that there are 7 billion individuals and not races.I also explained to you that there is more variation within a "race" than between them.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Oh please! don't tell me you are confusing correlation and causation. More only children/ more rich kids end up at university, some cultures prefer athletics, some don't. Genes play less of a role in academic success than environment and culture. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
Bray 2010: "We find evidence that Ashkenazi Jews have higher heterozygosity than Europeans, contradicting the presumption that they have been a largely isolated group".
@checkyoursources More bullshit. No it has nothing to do with culture. Even in Africa West Africans do not excel at running, but East Africans do. It has nothing to do with culture, East Africans have been 'bred' by nature and their environment to become runners, through natural selection. Their genetics make them good runners.
@checkyoursources And even if Ashkenazim Jews are more heterozygous, they will inherit the genetic traits of their ancestors not of other people they have not mixed with.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Oh please! don't tell me you are confusing correlation and causation. More only children/ more rich kids end up at university, some cultures prefer athletics, some don't. Genes play less of a role in academic success than environment and culture. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
Bray 2010: "We find evidence that Ashkenazi Jews have higher heterozygosity than Europeans, contradicting the presumption that they have been a largely isolated group".
People are happiest when they embrace their own inner nature. Attempting to 'nurture' natural phenomena out of our thought process is and will make us miserable. Just look at rates of depression. They are far higher than they were 50 years ago when segregation existed, in both black and white communities. The constitution guarantees us, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." A very good case could be made that what this guy, all anti-racists by extension, suggests is unconstitutional.
young kids, are wrong because they havnt been indused and harrassed by political correctness yet, so lets start telling them thier racist as totddlers so we can get the guilt and shame of being white out of the way. that way "our freinds" can continue to take our money, our future, and genetic future completely away from us. MY GOD YOU FUCKING SCUM! COWARD!
I'm gonna try to explain how i see this, so if you think i'm wrong, boo me. I DON't CARE.
Maybe, racism would have been helpfull if we were living in a planet without technology, globalization, science, ect.. It would be helpfull maybe to distinguish one from another.
It maybe exists in other species as well, and maybe it is part of evolution and helps create seprate spiecies.
Again boo me if you like, That's all I will say in this video(untill furthur notice).
talking about it to them early probably re-enforces it... so how about not doing it. I bet this guy suggest that we give 'race' lessons to kindergarten rofl
i knew as a child i was racially aware and always gravitated towards members of my own race. but right now its bad to want to live and be around only whites lol go figure.
@CathVampireSlayer And you prove this by neither being in command of the English grammar nor of correct spelling and punctuation. And you are morally superior by being racist? Poor creature. It seems that you are not even being capable of seeing your own limitations.
lol at the guy
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”
The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.
CatherineDeLancret 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apparently Jews can have a country where they are the majority and set the cultural standard. So can Indians, Arabs, Africans, Japanese and Chinese. But Europeans cannot.
You can call it multiculturalism, you can call it diversity, you can call it tolerance, you can call it whatever you want. But It is, in fact, deliberate, demographic, genocide.
KumarZimmerman08 4 months ago in playlist More videos from efilorpnagev
Children do notice skin color just as they notice BEAUTY or HEIGHT. However, RACISM or homophobia is NOT INNATE.
Judging others just because of the way they look is LEARNED.
PEOPLE who grow up constantly surrounded by a close community with same culture, same language but different races see everyone as EQUAL. Judging someone based on color is the furthest thing in their minds.
I know it because my family 200+ people, my friends and I grew up in a BIG METROPOLITAN AREA. SO THERE!
elpatriotaLX 6 months ago
THE REASON THEY PICK people of their own race is because, most children from the Suburbs only play with children of their own RACE. Some goes with black children, or Asian or Mexican. Places in America are separated (segregated) by race.
I grew up in a wealthy place very mix with EVERYTHING. ME AND MY FRIENDS LOVE EACH OTHER DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE LOOK LIKE THE UNITED NATIONS. Those are my brothers and sisters no matter what. I am German, Italian, Spanish and Venezuelan. Buyaaa
elpatriotaLX 6 months ago
@elpatriotaLX: Good call! Unfortunately, the racist right constantly tries to deny reality.........
MiracleMile90 3 months ago
Clever people learn to overcome the easy shallow lure of subjugating ones feelings to something as shallow as the way people look.
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
I'm a little surprised that they didn't use the kids trying to categorize the cards by sex as proof that babies are also sexist.
Although this guy does scare me a little. I've seen his image parodies so many times without knowing that there was an original image. I wonder if he considers me some kind of "ist" for thinking that.
TheLordmep 7 months ago
Sorry guys. You can't fight nature. We should listen to our human instincts, not the liberal media.
Whatdipisit 10 months ago
@Whatdipisit The liberal media are for the liberal intelligent. Yes, its true...the stupid fight or flight people who think on very base levels can't fight nature. Some intelligent humans can.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright . How's your sophomore year at community college treating you Mr. Genius?
Whatdipisit 7 months ago
@Whatdipisit I am 34 with a degree. I have been employed for 7 years at a Fort. 500. Thanks and have a nice day with your human nature while the rest of us who think remain civil.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago 2
@Jeffersonwazright Sweet
Whatdipisit 7 months ago
racism is an innate propensity in all people this is very true but, that does by no means condone it. All this gives evidence of mankinds primordial past in respect to survival tactics in assuring a persons cultural genetic identity (CGI) across the spectrum of variation and genetic continuity over a cycle of generations. social conditioning and cultural shaping also contribute to the (CGI) paradigm.
doctorw2 10 months ago
Racism is not learned behaviour. Non-racism is a taught behaviour. People express it expecting to receive praise for doing so and the sad part is they continue to receive it not just in their first classes as five year olds where it may be useful, they continue to get it as professors, but no evidence is ever required. People with evidence are suspect. Why would anybody want evidence about something which is officially true?
MartinJWillett 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus is lord of earth, repent, repent, repent, repent, pray, pray, pray.
bass109 1 year ago
Racism is not innate, because "race" is not biologically or genetically definable. "race" was invented to justify slavery. Saying that racism is in some way instinct or natural is as ridiculous because "race" doesn't didn't exist in the first place.
checkyoursources 1 year ago 2
sadly racism is an inate tendency and not a learned behaviour as so many psychologists have taught over the years. people will always notice diffrences among people not only on the basis of colour but, clothing,language, gender, and nationality as well this is intrinsic in human nature and is like some sort of tribal mentality any person who is not part of my particular tribe or culture is excluded from it and considered the lesser other. the real enigma are those people who arent racist at all.
doctorw2 1 year ago
Ah, the old "unnatural" argument.
eirefrance 1 year ago
@HyperBorealOperator freaking fucking AMEN to that!
They hate us!
TsakirisAlexandros 1 year ago
I bet the neighbors know my name...they way you scratching screaming sniffing yelling
qti707 1 year ago
To the public and ignorant, white's are the only "racists," when in fact, there are people of ever race that are racist.
Lrdvltr 1 year ago
@Lrdvltr people who promote "race" as biologically or genetically identifiable or classifiable are "racists". In fact, "race" is a myth according to the human genome project.
checkyoursources 1 year ago
@checkyoursources yea thats been disproven a few years back. But first off race isn't one gene it's a cluster of genes within populations. You can actually determine someones race via a DNA test.
kubaniski 11 months ago
@kubaniski You cannot determine someone's "race" from a DNA test, you are simply artifically creating a discontinuous group from continuous human variation. Who decides which clusters mean you belong to a particular "race", its subjective,not objective. "race" is a biological and genetic myth as stated by the human genome project. There are 7 billion genetically unique individuals, not "races". gene flow in humans never ceased.;
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources Yes you can biologists do it all the time especially inc rime labs. By comparing genetic markers within separate populations you can get a pretty good idea of human genetic movements. Yes all people are genetically unique but thats true for any living thing, but populations differ (it's called a subspecies) .
kubaniski 11 months ago
@kubaniski Nope, the human genome project (the most comprehensive study of human genomes) found no evidence whatsover for the existence of human subspecies in modern humans. We simply haven't had a long enough period of time where genes didn't flow across the entire human population.
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources yes they did say that, and then a few years later they retracted that statement. i belive your using old information. This was explained to using my collage bio class last semester. Biologists can determine race via DNA (look it up), they can also determine the race of a persons remains by looking at the skull structure and proportions of limbs, and by other characteristics.
kubaniski 11 months ago
@kubaniski Please supply a source that states that the HGP retracted the statement for me to check, thanks.
100% of genetic variation can be found just in Africa so you "race" concept is flawed.
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources well yes of course european genes exist in africa. Hell my girlfriend is a white south african, colonialism has spread Europeans and their genes all over the world.
kubaniski 11 months ago
@kubaniski Nope you misunderstood, Humans originated in Africa, the founder population was there. Even if you don't include South Africans who recently moved from Europe you still find 100% of genetic variation within Africa. There is no such thing as a "european" gene or genes.
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources no actually certain genes developed in populations after people left Africa, gene mutations continue to occur to this day. Certain gene mutations such as pale skin and slanty eyes developed in populations outside of Africa. Yes 99% of human DNA is the same but then again a single gene sequence drastically changes the appearance of an individual and then can spread to the larger population. Evolution takes place over millions of years and in tiny steps.
kubaniski 11 months ago
@kubaniski 100% of genetic variation on the planet can be found in Africa,it decreases the further you go away from Africa (see founder effect). Saying that % frequency defines a group is using artificial subjective categorisation because humans exist along a continuous range of variation. Modern human only evolved 200,000 years ago so we haven't had time for new alleles to evolve but we have lost some in environmentally varied areas. Read Long and Kittles 2003
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources people are being born with new alleles all the time, alleles such as eye color are a product of genetic divergence. There are plenty of genes which are common among mongoloids which are not present in other populations. Some genetic conditions such as tay-sacs are found in very small populations of Norther Europeans.
kubaniski 11 months ago
@checkyoursources It is more accurate to classify humans into 'breeds', as with all other animals. Race is something inaccurate and outdated. There are slight genetic differences between various ethnic groups which manifest themselves in various ways. Some populations are more likely to have certain genetic diseases or certain physical attributes than others. Phenotypes such as skin colour have nothing to do with it.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Nope, Modern Humans have only existed for around 100-200 thousand years, nowhere near long enough for subspecies to evolve. In addition gene flow has never ceased in the human population. There are genetic differences between all human individuals. In fact there are 7 billion different genetic individuals, not "races". Any grouping of such individuality and continuous variation is artificial and subjective.
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources No one is talking about subspecies. I am talking about subtle genetic differences which are not large enough to cause speciation, but they are the beginning of that process. Many individuals tend to share some common characteristics with certain other individuals but not everybody.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy You earlier claimed that there are "races". There is no "black gene" or "white gene" so how is your point relevant but to describe continuous varuation which i have already explained to you.
As stated, gene flow has never ceased in humans, there are differences, byt those are predominantly among individuals, not subjective "groups".
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources I have claimed no such thing. You clearly have misread. I said it was more accurate to classify people into breeds. I specifically said that phenotypes such as skin colour have nothing to do with anything and are unimportant. It was quite easy to understand. Geneflow never ceased but you cannot deny that specific 'breeds' of humans might have certain characteristics that other don't have due to various selection factors.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy People don't fit into "breeds" anymore than they fit into distinct biological or genetic "races. Humans show continuous genetic variation.
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources Yes they do. Populations that have lived for centuries in Ethiopia make excellent runners and might be vulnerable to specific diseases for very good reasons. A baby of two Ethiopian highlanders being born in France will still not prevent it from becoming an excellent runner like its parents. Face it, if we have no problems with associating dogs with breeds, then we shouldn't have problems doing the same for humans who are animals too.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Nope, you have switched from "race" to region and you are repeating myths perpertuated by racists and those who continue to promote the myth of genetic or biological races despite the Human genome project findings. Altitude and training correlates better with running performance than nationality or genetic factors.
You can find the tallest and shortest people on Earth in Africa.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources No this has nothing to do with the old concept of race. That was utter rubbish, take an Askenazim Jewish baby and raise it in Ethiopia. Then see whether it still manages to out run the original ethiopians
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Tell me, do you have sickle cell anaemia or tay sacs for instance?
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Sickle cell anaemia is found on every continent on the planet, tay sacs is found in many regions too. Neither indentify so called "race" nor are they unique to any "race".
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources Sickle cell anaemia is found were ever there are specific populations, the continent they migrated to is irrelevant. No it is not found on every continent either. Tay sacs is quite common in Ashkenazim populations but not Aborigine populations. Certain populations are far more predisposed to inheriting it because of evolution. You didn't answer my question, do you have sickle cell anaemia in your family?
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy The gene variant for sickle cell disease is related to malaria, not skin colour or "race". Malaria until recently was found on every continent bar Antarctica. An allele being more common in one region describes continuous variation not "race".I do not know the genetic history of my family. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
checkyoursources 11 months ago
@checkyoursources I am aware of that but it doesn't exclude the fact that specific breeds are for more suited to living in places were there is malaria better than others. I was not talking about race either. You cannot deny that there are specific genetic differences between different groups of people because of evolution. I don't know of any edges I might have, I know I am genetically similar certain people more than others and that I have the same predisposition to certain things.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy There are individual differences and these are greater than any so called "racial" differences. Are you admitting that there are no biological or genetic races yet?
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Not necessarily, I am not talking about races either. Why are Ashkenazim Jews over represented in universities but not in athletics?
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Depends on which populations. I'm talking about population groups not races. Why are certain diseases prevalent in specific populations but not others, even if they were to migrate to other countries?
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy But the discussion was about "races". If an allele is more common is one area it is simply continuous variation. Neither sickle cell or tay sachs are unique to any one population. They work on a clinal range.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources The fact is that they are found in specific populations but not others. Sickle cell anaemia is the result of a particular population or breed's adaptation to living with the malaria parasite. Another foreign population with no defence against it will have to evolve its own, unless it interbreeds with populations that do have a biological defence.
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy You have shifted from saying "races/breeds" exist in humans (which i strongly disagree with based on the evidence) to talking about specific alleles having earlier admitted than there is no single gene or allele that identifies your concept of "race/breed". Keep on topic.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources I am staying on topic, your definition of what constitutes a race is different to mine. The evidence is in my favour. As regards the alleles, that is also bollocks. There are a number of HLA antigens that are specific to certain ethnic groups and people descended from them but not others. Again you haven't told me why Aborigines don't suffer from Tay sacs if there is no genetic difference between ethnicities
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Maybe you are confusing ancestry and "race". Explain how the human genome is in your favour when it states that there is no evidence of human subspecies or "races" in modern humans? Diversity of HLA (not HLA antigens, the "A" stands for antigen) in humans is related to disease defense, and the chance of two individuals having identical HLA molecules on all loci is very low i.e. you are actually providing evidence with HLA that there are 7 billion individuals. not races.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources I really meant to write alleles there not antigens. The human genome has also reveled subtle differences between various populations. Tests on several specific HLA alleles demonstrate that their function varies according to ethnic group. It has been found that certain HLA alleles seem to offer protection against infection by certain viruses in people of specific ethnic backgrounds but not in others.
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@checkyoursources 'Race' has quite a lot do with ancestry, the original word for race actually also implied ancestry. Your ancestry determines a lot of things and makes you more genetically similar to certain individuals but not others. It also plays a crucial part in whether a graft your body receives is a success. Phenotypes such as skin colour are meaningless.
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@joseffritzlismydaddy As stated Diversity of HLA in humans is related to disease defense, and the chance of two individuals having IDENTICAL HLA molecules on all loci is very low i.e. you are actually providing evidence with HLA that there are 7 billion individuals and not races.I also explained to you that there is more variation within a "race" than between them.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Tell me why Ashkenazim Jews and certain Asian populations are over represented in universities but not in athletics.
joseffritzlismydaddy 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Oh please! don't tell me you are confusing correlation and causation. More only children/ more rich kids end up at university, some cultures prefer athletics, some don't. Genes play less of a role in academic success than environment and culture. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
Bray 2010: "We find evidence that Ashkenazi Jews have higher heterozygosity than Europeans, contradicting the presumption that they have been a largely isolated group".
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources More bullshit. No it has nothing to do with culture. Even in Africa West Africans do not excel at running, but East Africans do. It has nothing to do with culture, East Africans have been 'bred' by nature and their environment to become runners, through natural selection. Their genetics make them good runners.
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
@checkyoursources And even if Ashkenazim Jews are more heterozygous, they will inherit the genetic traits of their ancestors not of other people they have not mixed with.
joseffritzlismydaddy 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@joseffritzlismydaddy Oh please! don't tell me you are confusing correlation and causation. More only children/ more rich kids end up at university, some cultures prefer athletics, some don't. Genes play less of a role in academic success than environment and culture. I say again define the genetic edges of your own "race"?
Bray 2010: "We find evidence that Ashkenazi Jews have higher heterozygosity than Europeans, contradicting the presumption that they have been a largely isolated group".
checkyoursources 10 months ago
People are happiest when they embrace their own inner nature. Attempting to 'nurture' natural phenomena out of our thought process is and will make us miserable. Just look at rates of depression. They are far higher than they were 50 years ago when segregation existed, in both black and white communities. The constitution guarantees us, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." A very good case could be made that what this guy, all anti-racists by extension, suggests is unconstitutional.
dirtyboy830 1 year ago
young kids, are wrong because they havnt been indused and harrassed by political correctness yet, so lets start telling them thier racist as totddlers so we can get the guilt and shame of being white out of the way. that way "our freinds" can continue to take our money, our future, and genetic future completely away from us. MY GOD YOU FUCKING SCUM! COWARD!
combatleague 1 year ago
whether you talk about race or not, racism is still going to happen
DaMostEnigmatic 1 year ago
Hmm, so it is evolution.
I'm gonna try to explain how i see this, so if you think i'm wrong, boo me. I DON't CARE.
Maybe, racism would have been helpfull if we were living in a planet without technology, globalization, science, ect.. It would be helpfull maybe to distinguish one from another.
It maybe exists in other species as well, and maybe it is part of evolution and helps create seprate spiecies.
Again boo me if you like, That's all I will say in this video(untill furthur notice).
SurvivorFromKansas 2 years ago
This guy makes me sick. I love how he tries so desperately to fight against nature, sadly the call is for everyone else to do so as well.
StrictlyGentile 2 years ago 8
There is research to back up what he says - go on "google scholar" and check it out
snifnscratch 2 years ago
Yea. There is also a book- it's littered with research. =)
TheMrsAmanda 2 years ago
talking about it to them early probably re-enforces it... so how about not doing it. I bet this guy suggest that we give 'race' lessons to kindergarten rofl
mansson111 2 years ago 2
i knew as a child i was racially aware and always gravitated towards members of my own race. but right now its bad to want to live and be around only whites lol go figure.
kariryanisabitch 2 years ago 12
brown turds = losers
ne0nsurf 2 years ago
Yes I went to a all white grade school and to a all black high-school and I quickly learned I was racially and morally superior to the black students
CathVampireSlayer 2 years ago
@CathVampireSlayer And you prove this by neither being in command of the English grammar nor of correct spelling and punctuation. And you are morally superior by being racist? Poor creature. It seems that you are not even being capable of seeing your own limitations.
dikosch 2 years ago
@CathVampireSlayer same
chickensupdude 1 year ago