Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra Capitalist State and Socialism is about Freedom and Democracy, I am a Socialist,this Government doesnt even come close.
Socialism is slavery not freedom! Fascism is on one end of the socialist scale and communism is on the other side of the socialist scale. Any time you use government to do the bidding of the people then you have enslaved the people! Fascism has nothing to do with capitalism. Fascism is when the government controls industry, markets, economy!
"Any time you use government to do the bidding of the people then you have enslaved the people!" Pardon me, but if the Government is not to do the bidding of the people then what is the point of even having one then? Fascism is Right-Wing not Left-Wing,Communism is about the Power of the people, Fascism is built on an Elitist Capitalist Society.
The Nazis were fascist socialist,Fascism is government-controlled business! The U.S.A. Federal government is supposed to protect us from foreign aggressors & Domestic aggressors & from the government itself it is supposed to regulate the money as well all the other articles in the constitution! It is not supposed to steal our hard earned income and give it to some one else. It is not supposed to bail out huge corp. at taxpayer expense. The government is there to uphold the Constitution
Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra-Capitalist Class, Communism is built on the end of all Classes and all people ruling as one.The first people to fight Hitler and suffer his wrath besides the Jews were the Communists themselves.Your making a Biased Generalization and Slander of a people simply because you do not agree with there ideology.That makes you suspect in my eyes.
Bush is not a Socialist,he is a Neo-Conservtive Capitalist, stop blaming Communists for Capitalist crimes.You obviously have a lact of intellect and personal responsibility since you are the one who does not know the difference between right or left and Libertarian? No wonder, your a mix of Liberal with Conservative.
NEO-CONS are socialist that have taken over the Republican Party. You should name one capitalist crime that Bush committed just one. I believe Bush to be a criminal but he has committed to capitalist crimes. Just name one thing Bush has done that is conservative just one he is the biggest socialist since FDR! He is a bigger socialist the LBJ was. Calling me names will not change the facts.
lmao!!! The Neo-Conservitives are Conservative Capitalists that take the Republican Agenda to the Extreme.And all of his Crimes are Capitalist.His Imperialist Invasions of the Middle-East,Persecution of Activists,Torture and etc are all crimes of Capitalism, or will you deny this as well? Again, you need to learn what Socialism truly is or be quiet because your just making yourself look more fanatical every time.
And when did I say that only Conservatives Torture? I am talking Capitalism as a whole not just Conservatives,and I couldnt find the video you speak of, so why dont you find the link and then send it to me.
while true that Christopher Hicthens was formerly a self-named Trotskyiest,he was never a true Communist.He was part of a Liberal Democrat Capitalist Movement that claimed to be Trotskyiest but are openly Liberal and not Leftist.And then he swithced gears to become a full blown Conservative Capitalist and then a Neo-Con.But none of these people are followers of Trotsky and or Communist and Ive seen Mr. Paul's ideas and they would do very little to change the Elitist framework.The only difference
your right you did not say conservatives you said capitalist. Point is torture is not a crime that only capitalist or any single group alone can commit any group can torture
Oh I never said only Capitalists do this, all Right-Wingers do this as a whole.I will get back to you once I have a computer that has sound.When I get home I will hear Mr. Paul's take on Neo-Conservatives and then offer my reactions to it.
Hello voteDRNO, I just saw the video and it started out good but then degenerated into pure Propaganda.The Neo-Conservatives come from the Far-Right not the Far-Left, Trotsky would never have approved of the Pro-Imperialist/Expanionist Policies Capitalists from the Neo-Con Movement are leading.Permanent Revolution is the idea of the people Rising up to create a Revolution that will not be corrupted and transformed into a Totalitarian Government as Stalinist revolutions have.
I can see is that while he will limit the Government, the Corporations will still be in Power.The Government was made bigger so that the illusion of "democracy" without the ruling classes in control would be in play.But he has openly said he would allow private corporations to take over everything else so the Elites would still be in Power, only under him it would actually be more obvious as opposed to to the farse of democracy we have in America today.Meaning that with his way everyone will kno
Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra-Capitalist Class, Communism is built on the end of all Classes and all people ruling as one.The first people to fight Hitler and suffer his wrath besides the Jews were the Communists themselves.Your making a Biased Generalization and Slander of a people simply because you do not agree with there ideology.That makes you suspect in my eyes.
Your making a Biased Generalization of all Communists, like myself.If this Government was truly "socialist" why would so many Socialists be against it? Fascism is built on the Extermination of the Working Class and the Rise of an Aristocracy of Sorts from the Middle Class and up.The Nazis were Fascists not Socialists.
I am not making a biased generalization I am speaking truth! Why did you not answer my questions?
the Socialist are against our government because they do not understand socialism so they fight for the very thing they do not like. That stems from media and public school brain washing. fascist do NOT want to exterminate the working class they want to enslave it. They also want to enslave the middle class. they do not want a middle class that is why they send there kids to privite schools
The middle class & the poor send there kids to gov. indoctrination centers, for there brain washing. The only communist that wear successful are indigenous tribe type situations, like the American Indians. That type of life seems to be romantic in some ways, but personally I like having pluming, hot water toilets, electricity, computers, microwaves, and other technologies that the free market invent through compititution! In communism people have no incentive to learn more to become Doctor?
Key word on that "National" or "Nationalism" the Nazis took on the name of "national socialism" to fool the people because most of the Germans supported Communism and other Leftist Movements.But in pratice and ideology Fascism, "national socialism", whatever you want to call it is the opposite of what Communism is.And yes your right Indegenous peoples lived in what is known as Primitive Communism, they laid the groundwork for what Marx was talking about.However, Socialism under Lenin did work
Well keep that communist crap out of the USA. Personally I believe other nations should choose their own way. No communism for the USA. In order to make socialism work, no matter if it were on the Communist or the Fascist end of the socialist spectrum, you have to have nationalism. As long as some one opposes it your only solution is to get ride of them. wither it is exile, concentration camps or killing them that is the only solution in order to make it work!
came to power in the first place, when will you Right-Wingers stop crying like babies and take responsibility for yourselves instead of blaming it all on an Ideology that isnt even in Power in the first place.And Stalin did not rise to Power because of Communism, he rose because he orchestrated a Right-Wing Military Coup to smash the true Communist Government and put in his own Regime.
Bush is the one of if not the most socialist presidents in U.S. history! What am I crying about? I am a libertarian not sure you would call me a right winger but you constantly call me names any way I just assume you do that out of lack of intellect. Personal responsibility is the opposite of what communism is all about.
Russia can have whatever government they want. It is because of communism that Stalin could raise to power! I believe Bush to be a criminal who should be tried for treason and murder. It is because of socialism that has creped into our government that allowed Bush to get into power and abuse it. If our government obeyed the supreme law of the land, the constitution, then bush could not do the things he has done.
The checks and balances of the U.S. government no longer apply, because the United States government no longer obeys the constitution! The United State has been going down the slippery slope of socialism ever since the Federal Reserve came into power. Socialist ideas injected into the free market are the very reason of these global financial crises. There is no free market any more!
The US Government never followed the Constitution in the first place.And the Constitution was originally created by the Native Americans and was stolen by the Colonists, and since the Natives were Socialists of a Primitive sort that means the Constitution itself is Socialist in nature, but the Capitalists corrupted it and added things to it it never had originally.Like the belief that Black people were only a percentage of a Human being.And it is because of Capitalism, not Socialism that Bush
I do not remember reading anything about black people in my constitution I will have to go back and read that part! The American constitution was not writtin by native Amaericans not to say the indians or at least some of the tribes didn't have there own constitution!
do americans ever question why every president has a mandatory duty to support israel? if they did, they'll notice how influenced we are by fucking israel
yes, i find this very sad. it is just one fascist state supporting another. he is just as conservative as Bush in his foreign policy. America seems to have no choice, and as another poster said, it is just one big party now, and they are all warmongering conservatives.
Well technically it was islam that inspired/motivate osama to attack the USA. I wouldn't say our support for Israel was biggest reason why Osama and his group attacked the US.
No they're using it Jihad as a justifaction, because under Jihad you're not allowed to launch an offensive you can only use it to defend themselves so Bin Laden and his followers see it as defence against American encroachment.
Bin Laden hates the Saudi royal family, his main problem is them not you, he thinks they're an insult to the land they rule. Thats why he feels you as Americans are defending them along with Egypt.
So bin laden does have a religous inspiration/motivationl. You may not agree with his interpretation of it but he does, he does believe that what he is fighting for is for god.
I know that bin laden hates the saudi royal family. In fact that is one the primary reasons why he turned on the US was because he felt so dishonored that his own nation that his own muslims would rather use christians rather then muslims to defend the nation that houses islam's most holy site.
it's not about the palestinians, its about the fact that they were a once thriving muslim nation that has been occupied by the British then given to Israelis.
They also defend the second holiest site in the Islamic world and if they are driven out, Israel will destory the Al Quds Mosque to dig their so called temple underneath.
they already started actually, why do you think Ahmedinijad is saying the things he's saying.
Palestine has never been a nation. Ya but that site is more holy to jews then it is muslims. I'm not saying they should destroy the mosque but at the same time you need to recognize that just because its holy to muslims doesn't mean that other religons don't consider that place to be their holy sites and that maybe muslims have built over their holy sites.
Palestine has been a terrority/region of land but not a independent nation in its history. The region that is called Palestine has been ruled/conquered by atleast 8 different nations/kingdoms in the history of the land. So I doubt that it has been a nation for thousands of years considering I can tell you which countries and kingdoms ruled that land for the past several thousand years and not one of them was "palestine".
And can you show us where in Islam or any other faith does it support Terrorism or inspire it? And Osama attacked because of America's long History of State Sponsored Terrorism across the world.
Its not about terrorism or inspire to do terrorism. Its about someone being inspired by a verse or some text and then misinterpreting it/radicalizing it and then doing harm from it.
I never said Osama was defending the World from America, but America is not defending the World either, America is destroying it.Which is why for the safty of the World Amerikkka must fall.
Debatable about what you meant by Osama attacking america because america is attacking the world. America is looking out for its own interests. In terms of the entire world being destroyed by america, depend upon what you mean by that.
Yes and America's interests are for plundering the World of all Valuable Resources and getting rich at the cost of Human Lives so yes America is destroying the World.And who do you thyink trained Bin Laden in the first place and gave him money and weapons for Years? America did.Why do you think there name is Al-Qaeda (The Base)? Because of the Military Base that the CIA built in Afghanistan where they trained and created the Taliban and Mujahadin.Therefore America creates Terrorists.
Ah you might want to research the history of the MAK which was the precurser to AQ. You'll find that the CIA didn't directly fund or train the MAK. Bin laden used his own money to build his own training facilities and buy weapons. The only thing the US is guilty of is funding ISI training centers where some of mak fighters went for some training. The CIA had no direct relationship with bin laden or his mak/AQ unit.
to Democratically elected Regimes that made there nations Independent from U.S. Rule.That Organization later on became the Mother Organization of Al-Qaeda and the Mujahadin.Are you really going to sit there and tell me that the U.S.A. isnt responsible for Terrorism when they supported an opnely Terrorist group since World War II and then created Al-Qaeda? your in serious denial.
Well of course you disagree with the U.S.A. plundering the whole world like the Pirates of Old, you seem to enjoy covering for them.I am already aware of MAk and how Bin Laden used his own Money to fund his Operations.HOWEVER long before Bin Laden was even born, an Organization called The Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt was being trained and funded by the US during World War II as allies against the Nazis then in the Cold War to fight Leftist Activists and then also to send Terrorist Attacks
Bin Laden supported SOME of the Operations with his own Money, but he did not create the Organization or Operations as a whole.The U.S.A. did.Hence why I did not mentin MAK or Bin Laden's own money which in the end most people already know that part anyway but very few know about what I have mentioned.
The US gov. has no part in the creation of the MAK or AQ as a whole. That is completely done by Bin laden and Abdullah Yusuf Azzam. The US never had relations with either one of them. The US gov. did not fund their orgnizations or their operations. The taliban were not created until the 1990's, after the CIA funded ISI programs ended.
Well what your saying doesnt seem to make much sense considering even the Government admits that they had ties with the Taliban up until the invasion of Afghanistan when they wouldnt give up Bin Laden.And Al-Qaeda was created by the U.S. to fight the USSR.
Yes the US gov. sent aid to help the taliban in their opium eradification effort. Point being was the US didn't create the taliban. Aq was created by bin laden after 1989, so its impossible for AQ to fight the USSR when they were formed after the soviet withdrawal. The MAK was created to fight the USSR and the US had nothing to do with its creation, that was all bin laden and abullah yusuf azzam. You do know that the MAK was not afghan Mujahideen force.
yes Unless you live in Burlington Vt Houston TX Washington DC or Toledo Ohio Cable systems or Globecast World TV which carries the channel via a Globecast Sat Dish, Channel #463
and In the rest of world people get to see Cnn International BBC World and Cnn International, we should to. Cable and sat companies should be slammed hard by FCC to be forced to carry these channels its a nessessity for all of America Gov or not.
The fact that he's the alternative to McBush is reason alone to vote for him - at least we have a prayer for a world without nuclear war if he takes office, and it doesn't hurt that he promotes the middle class whenever he has a chance.
Print more currency = currency worth less! Currency is not money!!!! Gold is money! Our currency is not backed by gold! Do your research!!! Our future depends on it!
This bastard isn't going to bring any "change" except for the worse.
jazmella 3 years ago
freaking warmongering Americans! It's alright when THEY have nuclear power and NOT when other countries have it! Arrrgh! what the fuck!
might makes right huh? soooooo unfair!!
pichpuch66 3 years ago
i hate politicians. stupid lying bastards.
mark my words, Obama is going to let down the American people and create more wars and misery.
pichpuch66 3 years ago
Just another dam puppet VOTE THIRD PARTY!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Agreed,the Liberals and Conservatives are both part of the same Capitalist super structure and this is why neither side will change anything.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Not Capitalist but Fascist/Socialist
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra Capitalist State and Socialism is about Freedom and Democracy, I am a Socialist,this Government doesnt even come close.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Socialism is slavery not freedom! Fascism is on one end of the socialist scale and communism is on the other side of the socialist scale. Any time you use government to do the bidding of the people then you have enslaved the people! Fascism has nothing to do with capitalism. Fascism is when the government controls industry, markets, economy!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
"Any time you use government to do the bidding of the people then you have enslaved the people!" Pardon me, but if the Government is not to do the bidding of the people then what is the point of even having one then? Fascism is Right-Wing not Left-Wing,Communism is about the Power of the people, Fascism is built on an Elitist Capitalist Society.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
The Nazis were fascist socialist,Fascism is government-controlled business! The U.S.A. Federal government is supposed to protect us from foreign aggressors & Domestic aggressors & from the government itself it is supposed to regulate the money as well all the other articles in the constitution! It is not supposed to steal our hard earned income and give it to some one else. It is not supposed to bail out huge corp. at taxpayer expense. The government is there to uphold the Constitution
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra-Capitalist Class, Communism is built on the end of all Classes and all people ruling as one.The first people to fight Hitler and suffer his wrath besides the Jews were the Communists themselves.Your making a Biased Generalization and Slander of a people simply because you do not agree with there ideology.That makes you suspect in my eyes.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
suspect off what?
I do not understand how Fascism is built on the Ultra-Capitalist Class? not sure that I really understand the statement!
what do you mean when you say Communism is built on the end of all classes?
wear the nazi Fascist or Socialist?
which people did I slander?
who am I making a biased Generlization off?
Who ideology do I disagree with?
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Bush is not a Socialist,he is a Neo-Conservtive Capitalist, stop blaming Communists for Capitalist crimes.You obviously have a lact of intellect and personal responsibility since you are the one who does not know the difference between right or left and Libertarian? No wonder, your a mix of Liberal with Conservative.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
NEO-CONS are socialist that have taken over the Republican Party. You should name one capitalist crime that Bush committed just one. I believe Bush to be a criminal but he has committed to capitalist crimes. Just name one thing Bush has done that is conservative just one he is the biggest socialist since FDR! He is a bigger socialist the LBJ was. Calling me names will not change the facts.
voteDRNO 3 years ago
lmao!!! The Neo-Conservitives are Conservative Capitalists that take the Republican Agenda to the Extreme.And all of his Crimes are Capitalist.His Imperialist Invasions of the Middle-East,Persecution of Activists,Torture and etc are all crimes of Capitalism, or will you deny this as well? Again, you need to learn what Socialism truly is or be quiet because your just making yourself look more fanatical every time.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Ron Paul Exposes Neo Conservatives A.K.A. NEOCONS
voteDRNO 3 years ago
torture is a crime that only conservatives can commit please that is pretty stupid! Imperlialism is not a conservative crime!
Calling me faniatical you might take a look in the mirror!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
And when did I say that only Conservatives Torture? I am talking Capitalism as a whole not just Conservatives,and I couldnt find the video you speak of, so why dont you find the link and then send it to me.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=G0N0iqUiaTs
it worked for me just now! All you have to do is cut
Ron Paul Exposes Neo Conservatives A.K.A. NEOCONS
and past in to youtube search engine!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
while true that Christopher Hicthens was formerly a self-named Trotskyiest,he was never a true Communist.He was part of a Liberal Democrat Capitalist Movement that claimed to be Trotskyiest but are openly Liberal and not Leftist.And then he swithced gears to become a full blown Conservative Capitalist and then a Neo-Con.But none of these people are followers of Trotsky and or Communist and Ive seen Mr. Paul's ideas and they would do very little to change the Elitist framework.The only difference
VampireLord66 3 years ago
your right you did not say conservatives you said capitalist. Point is torture is not a crime that only capitalist or any single group alone can commit any group can torture
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Oh I never said only Capitalists do this, all Right-Wingers do this as a whole.I will get back to you once I have a computer that has sound.When I get home I will hear Mr. Paul's take on Neo-Conservatives and then offer my reactions to it.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Hello voteDRNO, I just saw the video and it started out good but then degenerated into pure Propaganda.The Neo-Conservatives come from the Far-Right not the Far-Left, Trotsky would never have approved of the Pro-Imperialist/Expanionist Policies Capitalists from the Neo-Con Movement are leading.Permanent Revolution is the idea of the people Rising up to create a Revolution that will not be corrupted and transformed into a Totalitarian Government as Stalinist revolutions have.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
I can see is that while he will limit the Government, the Corporations will still be in Power.The Government was made bigger so that the illusion of "democracy" without the ruling classes in control would be in play.But he has openly said he would allow private corporations to take over everything else so the Elites would still be in Power, only under him it would actually be more obvious as opposed to to the farse of democracy we have in America today.Meaning that with his way everyone will kno
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Did I SAY Ron Paul was a Neo-Conservitive? No I did not
VampireLord66 3 years ago
why don't you try and cut
Ron Paul Exposes Neo Conservatives A.K.A. NEOCONS
and paste in youtube and check out what Dr. paul has to say about NEO-CONs
voteDRNO 3 years ago
they are fucked as opposed to not knowing we are Fucked now because of the illusion of Democracy.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Fascism is built on the creation of an Ultra-Capitalist Class, Communism is built on the end of all Classes and all people ruling as one.The first people to fight Hitler and suffer his wrath besides the Jews were the Communists themselves.Your making a Biased Generalization and Slander of a people simply because you do not agree with there ideology.That makes you suspect in my eyes.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
suspect off what?
I do not understand how Fascism is built on the Ultra-Capitalist Class? not sure that I really understand the statement!
what do you mean when you say Communism is built on the end of all classes?
wear the nazi Fascist or Socialist?
which people did I slander?
who am I making a biased Generlization off?
Who ideology do I disagree with?
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Your making a Biased Generalization of all Communists, like myself.If this Government was truly "socialist" why would so many Socialists be against it? Fascism is built on the Extermination of the Working Class and the Rise of an Aristocracy of Sorts from the Middle Class and up.The Nazis were Fascists not Socialists.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
I am not making a biased generalization I am speaking truth! Why did you not answer my questions?
the Socialist are against our government because they do not understand socialism so they fight for the very thing they do not like. That stems from media and public school brain washing. fascist do NOT want to exterminate the working class they want to enslave it. They also want to enslave the middle class. they do not want a middle class that is why they send there kids to privite schools
voteDRNO 3 years ago
The middle class & the poor send there kids to gov. indoctrination centers, for there brain washing. The only communist that wear successful are indigenous tribe type situations, like the American Indians. That type of life seems to be romantic in some ways, but personally I like having pluming, hot water toilets, electricity, computers, microwaves, and other technologies that the free market invent through compititution! In communism people have no incentive to learn more to become Doctor?
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Key word on that "National" or "Nationalism" the Nazis took on the name of "national socialism" to fool the people because most of the Germans supported Communism and other Leftist Movements.But in pratice and ideology Fascism, "national socialism", whatever you want to call it is the opposite of what Communism is.And yes your right Indegenous peoples lived in what is known as Primitive Communism, they laid the groundwork for what Marx was talking about.However, Socialism under Lenin did work
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Well keep that communist crap out of the USA. Personally I believe other nations should choose their own way. No communism for the USA. In order to make socialism work, no matter if it were on the Communist or the Fascist end of the socialist spectrum, you have to have nationalism. As long as some one opposes it your only solution is to get ride of them. wither it is exile, concentration camps or killing them that is the only solution in order to make it work!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
came to power in the first place, when will you Right-Wingers stop crying like babies and take responsibility for yourselves instead of blaming it all on an Ideology that isnt even in Power in the first place.And Stalin did not rise to Power because of Communism, he rose because he orchestrated a Right-Wing Military Coup to smash the true Communist Government and put in his own Regime.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Bush is the one of if not the most socialist presidents in U.S. history! What am I crying about? I am a libertarian not sure you would call me a right winger but you constantly call me names any way I just assume you do that out of lack of intellect. Personal responsibility is the opposite of what communism is all about.
voteDRNO 3 years ago
Nazi Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from National Socialist German Workers Party)National Socialist German Workers' Party
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
Former German national party
Years active 1919-1945
Political Ideology National Socialism
voteDRNO 3 years ago
it wasnt until the rise of Joseph Stalin that it became corrupted.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Russia can have whatever government they want. It is because of communism that Stalin could raise to power! I believe Bush to be a criminal who should be tried for treason and murder. It is because of socialism that has creped into our government that allowed Bush to get into power and abuse it. If our government obeyed the supreme law of the land, the constitution, then bush could not do the things he has done.
voteDRNO 3 years ago
The checks and balances of the U.S. government no longer apply, because the United States government no longer obeys the constitution! The United State has been going down the slippery slope of socialism ever since the Federal Reserve came into power. Socialist ideas injected into the free market are the very reason of these global financial crises. There is no free market any more!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
The US Government never followed the Constitution in the first place.And the Constitution was originally created by the Native Americans and was stolen by the Colonists, and since the Natives were Socialists of a Primitive sort that means the Constitution itself is Socialist in nature, but the Capitalists corrupted it and added things to it it never had originally.Like the belief that Black people were only a percentage of a Human being.And it is because of Capitalism, not Socialism that Bush
VampireLord66 3 years ago
I do not remember reading anything about black people in my constitution I will have to go back and read that part! The American constitution was not writtin by native Amaericans not to say the indians or at least some of the tribes didn't have there own constitution!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
do americans ever question why every president has a mandatory duty to support israel? if they did, they'll notice how influenced we are by fucking israel
moester101 3 years ago 7
yes, i find this very sad. it is just one fascist state supporting another. he is just as conservative as Bush in his foreign policy. America seems to have no choice, and as another poster said, it is just one big party now, and they are all warmongering conservatives.
aerugo49 3 years ago
It's the reason why you were attacked in 9/11, but the zionist owned media turned around blaming our religion and that we hate your freedoms
Omer698 3 years ago 3
Well technically it was islam that inspired/motivate osama to attack the USA. I wouldn't say our support for Israel was biggest reason why Osama and his group attacked the US.
Noliving 3 years ago
it has nothing to do with islam, if every muslim did the same thing osama does America will be Iraq X 1 Billion.
When America has bases on Saudi Arabia and it backrolls israel to occupy land it doesn't own then you have to expect people will get angry
Omer698 3 years ago
So your saying when they say they do it for islam they are lying?
America has bases because saudi arabia asked for them. When it comes to israel it depends, if they do it by conquest then they own it.
Noliving 3 years ago
No they're using it Jihad as a justifaction, because under Jihad you're not allowed to launch an offensive you can only use it to defend themselves so Bin Laden and his followers see it as defence against American encroachment.
Bin Laden hates the Saudi royal family, his main problem is them not you, he thinks they're an insult to the land they rule. Thats why he feels you as Americans are defending them along with Egypt.
Omer698 3 years ago
So bin laden does have a religous inspiration/motivationl. You may not agree with his interpretation of it but he does, he does believe that what he is fighting for is for god.
I know that bin laden hates the saudi royal family. In fact that is one the primary reasons why he turned on the US was because he felt so dishonored that his own nation that his own muslims would rather use christians rather then muslims to defend the nation that houses islam's most holy site.
Noliving 3 years ago
Does any muslim/arab ever question why they have a mandatory duty to support palestinians?
Noliving 3 years ago
it's not about the palestinians, its about the fact that they were a once thriving muslim nation that has been occupied by the British then given to Israelis.
They also defend the second holiest site in the Islamic world and if they are driven out, Israel will destory the Al Quds Mosque to dig their so called temple underneath.
they already started actually, why do you think Ahmedinijad is saying the things he's saying.
type in Michael Scheuer in youtube
Omer698 3 years ago
Palestine has never been a nation. Ya but that site is more holy to jews then it is muslims. I'm not saying they should destroy the mosque but at the same time you need to recognize that just because its holy to muslims doesn't mean that other religons don't consider that place to be their holy sites and that maybe muslims have built over their holy sites.
Noliving 3 years ago
Not to mention the fact that you are still giving the palestinians unconditional support because of the fact they defend teh Al Quds mosque.
Noliving 3 years ago
The Palestinians have been a Nation for Thousands of Years.Israel is a False and Illegal Terrorist State that must be destroyed
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Palestine has been a terrority/region of land but not a independent nation in its history. The region that is called Palestine has been ruled/conquered by atleast 8 different nations/kingdoms in the history of the land. So I doubt that it has been a nation for thousands of years considering I can tell you which countries and kingdoms ruled that land for the past several thousand years and not one of them was "palestine".
Noliving 3 years ago
Finally!!! Someone who actually knows what he's talking about.Thank you very much for speaking the truth.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
And can you show us where in Islam or any other faith does it support Terrorism or inspire it? And Osama attacked because of America's long History of State Sponsored Terrorism across the world.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Its not about terrorism or inspire to do terrorism. Its about someone being inspired by a verse or some text and then misinterpreting it/radicalizing it and then doing harm from it.
Noliving 3 years ago
Really so Osama claims he is now defending the world from america.
Noliving 3 years ago
I never said Osama was defending the World from America, but America is not defending the World either, America is destroying it.Which is why for the safty of the World Amerikkka must fall.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Debatable about what you meant by Osama attacking america because america is attacking the world. America is looking out for its own interests. In terms of the entire world being destroyed by america, depend upon what you mean by that.
Noliving 3 years ago
Yes and America's interests are for plundering the World of all Valuable Resources and getting rich at the cost of Human Lives so yes America is destroying the World.And who do you thyink trained Bin Laden in the first place and gave him money and weapons for Years? America did.Why do you think there name is Al-Qaeda (The Base)? Because of the Military Base that the CIA built in Afghanistan where they trained and created the Taliban and Mujahadin.Therefore America creates Terrorists.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Ah you might want to research the history of the MAK which was the precurser to AQ. You'll find that the CIA didn't directly fund or train the MAK. Bin laden used his own money to build his own training facilities and buy weapons. The only thing the US is guilty of is funding ISI training centers where some of mak fighters went for some training. The CIA had no direct relationship with bin laden or his mak/AQ unit.
Disagree on the entire world being plundered.
Noliving 3 years ago
to Democratically elected Regimes that made there nations Independent from U.S. Rule.That Organization later on became the Mother Organization of Al-Qaeda and the Mujahadin.Are you really going to sit there and tell me that the U.S.A. isnt responsible for Terrorism when they supported an opnely Terrorist group since World War II and then created Al-Qaeda? your in serious denial.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Well of course you disagree with the U.S.A. plundering the whole world like the Pirates of Old, you seem to enjoy covering for them.I am already aware of MAk and how Bin Laden used his own Money to fund his Operations.HOWEVER long before Bin Laden was even born, an Organization called The Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt was being trained and funded by the US during World War II as allies against the Nazis then in the Cold War to fight Leftist Activists and then also to send Terrorist Attacks
VampireLord66 3 years ago
ok, but that is not what you said about MAK and bin laden in your previous post.
Noliving 3 years ago
Bin Laden supported SOME of the Operations with his own Money, but he did not create the Organization or Operations as a whole.The U.S.A. did.Hence why I did not mentin MAK or Bin Laden's own money which in the end most people already know that part anyway but very few know about what I have mentioned.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
The US gov. has no part in the creation of the MAK or AQ as a whole. That is completely done by Bin laden and Abdullah Yusuf Azzam. The US never had relations with either one of them. The US gov. did not fund their orgnizations or their operations. The taliban were not created until the 1990's, after the CIA funded ISI programs ended.
Noliving 3 years ago
Well what your saying doesnt seem to make much sense considering even the Government admits that they had ties with the Taliban up until the invasion of Afghanistan when they wouldnt give up Bin Laden.And Al-Qaeda was created by the U.S. to fight the USSR.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
Yes the US gov. sent aid to help the taliban in their opium eradification effort. Point being was the US didn't create the taliban. Aq was created by bin laden after 1989, so its impossible for AQ to fight the USSR when they were formed after the soviet withdrawal. The MAK was created to fight the USSR and the US had nothing to do with its creation, that was all bin laden and abullah yusuf azzam. You do know that the MAK was not afghan Mujahideen force.
Noliving 3 years ago
The Muslims Brotherhood came first, then the Mujahideen,then Al-Qaeda and finally the Taliban.They were all the children of the CIA.
VampireLord66 3 years ago
ok........
Noliving 3 years ago
I also never said Islam or any other faith supports terrorism. Now in terms of being inspired? That is based upon the interpretation of the text.
Noliving 3 years ago
they r pionting one of those mood rays at the audience to make them feel happy and cheerful when they see OBAMANATION~!
blankateeblank 3 years ago
is this the only place to get Inside USA?
sptaznut 3 years ago
yes Unless you live in Burlington Vt Houston TX Washington DC or Toledo Ohio Cable systems or Globecast World TV which carries the channel via a Globecast Sat Dish, Channel #463
and In the rest of world people get to see Cnn International BBC World and Cnn International, we should to. Cable and sat companies should be slammed hard by FCC to be forced to carry these channels its a nessessity for all of America Gov or not.
andybowe 3 years ago
make sure you do one of these for mccain and nader too
jtr3030 3 years ago 3
watch?v=BbvmW3yjFtg
iTellYouNoLie 3 years ago
"the largest mercenary army in the history of the world"
google fema camps, wake the fuck up dumbocrats, the two parties are really one.
iTellYouNoLie 3 years ago 3
I still can't figure out who Bilderberg *selected* to be president
DJTonyAllen 3 years ago
Obama. McCain, Hilary, Mitt Romney, any body who seemed like that had a chance! they own them all!
voteDRNO 3 years ago
vote for a 3rd party
FREEAMERICANOW69 3 years ago 4
another warmonger it does not matter wither r-d are both the same comeing from the u.s.
ikran2007 3 years ago
yes i agree with the below comments
-
Very good balance insight al jazeera
I think alot of what is said will hold true in the future - Sad but true .
jellyblocked 3 years ago
I'm truely dissappointed by Al Jazeera in this documentary. some issues that are untruthfully represented or unmentioned in this "documentary":
- Iraq was an illegal, American undertaking; Afghantisan is a NATO mission
- Obama has an extensive plan for public investments; which is argued against in this vid
rtBen 3 years ago 4
The fact that he's the alternative to McBush is reason alone to vote for him - at least we have a prayer for a world without nuclear war if he takes office, and it doesn't hurt that he promotes the middle class whenever he has a chance.
Gormaoul 3 years ago 2
I think you need to learn some history before you utter such BULLSHIT.
Do you know who ordered dropping the two nukes on Japan? A democrat.
Do you know how many nukes have been used militarily since then? 0.
Do you know how many Republican presidents we had since Truman? 6.
mengwise36 3 years ago
Gormaoul might be referring to Obama's intention of a nuclear free world.
Compare that to McCain/Palin who support Ukraine and Georgia to join NATO without conditions:
- Ukraine's governement collapsed just today
- Russia invaded Georgia not too long ago
You want a USA-Russia open war?: vote McCain!
rtBen 3 years ago
Have you heard of political posturing? You should know since Obama does it all the time.
Membership to NATO is not decided by the POTUS. Read more about it before you spew your fear mongering crap here.
mengwise36 3 years ago
a cynical closing remark might escape your grasps.
rtBen 3 years ago
Thinking your comment will somehow escape my grasp just shows how delusional you are.
mengwise36 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
america is fucked! completley fucked! obama is a zionist agent! lmfao ohhhhhhh maaaaaaaan the sheep are sooo dumb!
GoodMeBad 3 years ago
great video thanks
Ssaya 3 years ago
Obama is one man. He changed the world by changing himself. That is the one lesson to learn from this man.
We must ALL be our own Change.
Partida2012 3 years ago 3
thats true, because obama wont help you.
jklasdfjdfksl 3 years ago
good job al jazeera
GuyInvincible111 3 years ago 7
Print more currency = currency worth less! Currency is not money!!!! Gold is money! Our currency is not backed by gold! Do your research!!! Our future depends on it!
Organjic 3 years ago 2
yay! first view...
Partida2012 3 years ago