haha this is great, I laugh at the comment sections on this type of video... always full of retarded religous nutjobs. You don't see athetists all up in your religous videos now do you
My comments effectively combine as Checkmate. Those who understand fundamental logic easily recognize arguing against the facts I have presented, is to argue on behalf of insanity, lying & deception. What I have written is not a clever argument, it is the simple Truth in simple terms, which sane people understand. My argument is supported by Fundamental Logic, which is predicated on a fundamental commitment to the Truth.
Atheists/Satanists are self proven fundamentally insane, lying frauds.
Logic is an online textbook that explains fundamental logic. The basis of the human logic and belief structure, is a fundamental commitment to the Truth (ONLY SANE CHOICE), which inherently expands to include all possibilities.
"Logic, an online textbook by Garth Kemerling, explains the basic elements of elementary logic, at an undergraduate level."
Fail the truth (INSANE) or sustain a commitment to the truth (SANE). Atheist/Satanists are fundamentally insane, lying frauds.
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (only sane choice), inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themselves fundamentally insane liars & frauds. When Atheist/Satanists dismiss God as a possibility, they breach their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
He just says "NO" and they applaud for 26 seconds. They may be Atheists but they seem to think he's infallible no matter what he says and seem to venerate him like a God.
@KrackowKid hes become the big guy in 'new atheism' which simply means that us atheists sort of started talking publicly and discussing a lot more (not burning anybody, not cutting our daughters genitals off). I think new atheism was/is a reaction to 9/11 and the major rise in passions from muslims and christians around that time. Dawkins and others just took a stand and said 'lets think'. Inspiring guy and infinately cleverer than any preacher, but yeah its possible to go overboard for anyone
@arnoldlayne1991 Of course he hasn't. No-one as clever as he is could ever be convinced by the utter drivel spouted by the theists and their young-earth, creationist twat offspring.
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
How could all of the theists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero ( and actually comes from scientists ), when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
@MegaSensimilla Before he enters the realm of science and knowledge with all its concerns, man is able to perceive certain truths by means of these innate perceptions. But after entering the sphere of science and philosophy and filling his *brain* with various proofs and deductions, he may forget his natural and innate perceptions or begin to doubt them. It is for this reason that when man moves beyond his innate nature to delineate a belief, differences begin to appear.
"Before he enters the realm of science and knowledge with all its concerns, man is able to perceive certain truths by means of these innate perceptions."
Rationalism does not always precede empiricism in human beings. I have no idea how you came up with such a retarded proposition.
@1tabligh Wait, wait, you're saying atheist scientists aren't allowed to claim God isn't real, and by extension claim to know the universe inside-out, and what the purpose of mankind is?
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
@Vulgarth1 Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *unknowing and unperceiving *, is his creator and that of all beings?
No?
Then how can the duped atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and *believe* that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
@1tabligh Behold! The idiotic witterings of the deliberately blind and foolish theist. Please go and do some research, even just watching YouTube videos on science and cosmology might help someone as pitiful as you.
@MasterAtheistic The idiotic witterings of the deliberately blind and foolish theist.
___
Poor fella!
Talking like 6 years old kid!
How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
@gorilla199uncensored composition between oxygen and hydrogen, it becomes necessary for it to be repeated in accordance with those laws and decrees, as the existence of water is repeated whenever certain chemical factors are present, whether or not water is necessary; for necessity in the natural sense is merely the necessity produced by the laws and decrees of nature. What then made those laws and decrees different?
@MrCoolone05 Genocide, rape, genital mutilation, human sacrifice, theft of land, murder, mass extinctions, random violence, hatred, vile nonsense, looks like someone opened the Holly Bibble!
@MrCoolone05 Err, all the acts of men COMMANDED to carry them out by your vicious, malevolent, psychotic Gob Yahweh in the Old Testicle, sorry Testament. Funny how you retarded Bibble Thumpers manage to pick and choose the bits you want to believe in the Bibble but totally forget those unfortunate and rather disgusting parts that tend to prove that either;
A: Your Gob is a fucking nutter
OR
B: He never existed and was made up by greedy, immoral men for their own evil reasons.
@MasterAtheistic Youve got a fantastic sense of humour.It.s only natural that believers would want to focus on the nice side to God.You would make a great christian I hope you discover his boundless grace one day.Gob bless you I mean God bless you.
@MrCoolone05 I was a Chwistian and doubt I will ever succumb to such idiocy again. The only possibility of that happening would be if Yeshua bar Joseph did actually materialise on earth and performed real and verifiable miracles, raised the newly deceased, parted the Red Sea perhaps and stopped all war, famine, and suffering. Can't see that happening. Even then the question would be 'where the bloody hell have you been, look at all the suffering you have allowed you selfish, silly barsteward!'
@MasterAtheistic None of those horrible things will exist when Jesus returns to set up his kingdom on earth so theres a wonderful hope for mankind.I knew there was something likeable about you God said I will never leave you nor forsake you.you maybe dissapointed in God but he still has a deep concern for your life,remember once a chwistian allways a chwistian march on to victory bro.
@MrCoolone05 Sorry to disappoint you but I will NEVER be a religious person again. I know too much about the real history of Yeshua bar Joseph to ever expect him to return in any form at all, never mind as some sort of savioury snack of mankind. He may well have survived the cross as he was cut down quickly. His wealthy father may have bribed the Romans, thus explaining his 'resurrection' but he never survived Masada where the dreams of the Zealots died & an elderly Yeshua bar Joseph with them.
The hypocrite is yourself. If you believe that right and wrong are decided by God, then, hypothetically, if God were to suddenly decide that murder is OK, then it would become morally acceptable. In fact, since God himself appears to rely solely on fallible human beings to do his speaking for him, his followers have often felt he made exceptions to the sixth commandment, from Moses and Joshua, to the Crusaders and Inquisition, to those who fly planes into buildings on his behalf.
@SpaceOdyssey56 Those people who flew the planes into the twin towers worship a different god to me my God is the King of all Glory Jesus of Nazereth.
@nontrainspotter It.s not that important where he grew up whats important is the fact that he came into this world on a rescue mission to redeem mankind.where countless millions have found refuge in that name.You go to a mechanic to get your car fixed so go to the saviour to get your soul saved..simple really.God bless you.
@MasterAtheistic A redneck is someone who is from America Im Australian and weve all been f***wits at onestage or another...You could never come close to insulting me as much as my own father has and guess what I love him now thats VICTORY...
The "myth" of evolution that you speak of is your own MYTHconception of it. In evolutionary terms, there is no "higher" and "lower"; a jellyfish and a lion are both well adapted to their respective environments; a fact that you would be aware of if you had ever read Richard Dawkins.
@SpaceOdyssey56 Yes quite a clever response but evolution if it were true could easily be proven why is it that scientists allways find bones of apes or bones of men never the bones of apeman maybe it.s because they dont exist. But yeh good on you for being mature about this matter.
Poor Rhichard Dawkins he and all the other deluded atheists stiill beleiving in the evolution myth If he was a true intellect he would,ve come to the conclusion that if evolution were true than the most evolved and advanced creature allready exsists...What is it it.s a jelly fish or a jelly blubber. It cant die of lung cancer it,s got no lungs maybe a heart attack sorry no heart.And it knows where it,s going but has,nt got any eyes.God is truely wondeful,
Listen to me atheists! You will go to HELL. Believe or not, God exists, hell is real. If you don't believe the existence of him, he will send you to hell. You will BURN IN THE LAKE OF THE FIRE ETERNALLY!! No one will help you. Now! Evolution is a GREAT LIE! Science is a liberal conspiracy. Scientists are satanic atheists who wants to destroy our values. No matter what you think. Hell is REAL! Believe before you die, or burn in hell. God will NEVER forgive you!
@freandwhickquest i'm sure god will have MUCH better reasons to send me to hell then for simply not believing. And if his commandments have anything to do with it you'll probably be right there beside me regardless of your beliefs.
@lc237 Richard Dawkins hypocrite doesnt beleive in God but believes in the law where did the law come from but God so if you believe in the law then you believe in God because the law came from God so in reality there are no real atheists a real atheist woud reject the law...We cant have that now can we...LOL.
@lc237 You mean the Reality that Nothing exploded into everything, then afterwards the planets formed, then the earth was like the moon, and it rained on rocks for billions of years, then it became a soup where Non-living matter turned into Living matter and then came Evolution, Then Fish actually started feeling the need to breathe air and crawled on land, and the human being both male and female are 2 different evolution's, that can breed ( all i just said were unproven )
@lc237 To this day in´ State of the art labs, and hundreds years of research done by the brightest minds in the world, and they still cant create living matter out of non living matter, but this happens unguided in the nature by sheer chance ?
The second law of Thermodynamics state " Energy cannot be created or destroyed " Then where did the Energy come from ? What fueled the big bang ? Where does the energy come from that makes the electrons circle the nucleus forever ?
@mukkohaha "The second law of Thermodynamics state " Energy cannot be created or destroyed "" You obviously don't know shit about science. Conservation of energy is the *first* law of thermodynamics.
@TomFynn Your right it's the first law thank you for correcting me.
" U wrong " It's spelled Your wrong, your obviously word blind, and Retarded.
Now when we are done with Throwing mud, would you please make a real reply ? or just shut up and don't waste my time, If it's the 1st or 2nd law, was not the real point, do you think i remember that stuff in my head perfectly, clearly i just barely missed.
@mukkohaha The point was that U are ignorant of science to an embarrassing degree and are just flinging Big Words around, trying to sound impressive. U get away with that in Sunday school, in science U actually have to know what U are talking about.
@lc237 In state of the Art labs they cannot even creating the simplest form of living matter, While in Nature' There are 2 Evolution's ongoing that both make a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " You gotta be a naive person with no ability to think for yourself to believe that this happens unguided in nature.
Macro evolution is only, Mutations that improves the living entity according to Survival of the fittest. other than that it's completely random
@lc237 But this "Evolution" must create a male and a female of each, so they can reproduce, And Evolution dossn't have a mind of it's own, It's just Mistakes in the DNA / genome that can be either advantageous or disadvantageous.
To this day countless studies have been made with Flies' where they mutate them, Their haven't been 1 single account of a " good " mutation, most of them are fatal. the rest is freaks of nature. even Dawkins knows this-
@TomFynn I just informed myself on the experiments by Richard Lenski on E. Coli
That doesn't prove anything. Do you understand that a fish's lung system doesn't work on land, Why would it slowly evolve lungs that could'n breathe water while still swimming ? And hopefully you do also understand that the exact Fish Both male and Female had to do 2 Different Mutations simultaneously that were at all times interbreed able, and then magically crawl on land. naive ;)
@mukkohaha Major point? The 747 analogy is a fallacy that even has it's own wiki, your ramblings about fishes is the purest form of bullshit west of Shit Creek, U obviously did not understand the point of the E.Coli experiment - demonstrating that there are beneficial mutations, contrary to your claim, your understanding of science is laughable and now U are running away.
@TomFynn In state of the Art labs they cannot even create the simplest form of living matter from non-living matter, While in Nature' There is 2 Evolution's ongoing that make both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations "
Just having 2 Simultaneously Evolution s of Interbreed-able beings is a miracle greater then you can comprehend, but clearly in Nature that stuff happens all the time by sheer random chance, roll of the dice.
@TomFynn That stuff doesn't happen, any person capable of critical thinking ( being able to think, NOT only being able to repeat a book like a parrot ) knows that stuff like that don't happen in nature by random chance.
A tornado sweeping through a junk yard would have a much better chance of assembling a fully operational Boeing 757, " but if we wait long enough even that will happen " That's the Naive retarded way of thinking of modern science what a joke.
@mukkohaha Ah, the 747 fallacy. Still alive in these days. Told U, U have no clue about science. Do try to look up what evolution actually is, instead of just parroting what your preacher-man tells U.
@mukkohaha Unfortunately for U, the original fallacy originating supposedly by Hoyle and generally argued in creatard circles is the *747* fallacy. But thanks for pointing out that you are incapable of even getting the name of your own fallacies right.
Or did U invent a new fallacy all on your own? If yes, congrats.
@mukkohaha "There are even 2 Evolution's (mutations) simultaneously both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " that is able to interbreed, That is impossible." Learn to form intelligible sentences.
"While in Nature, completely unguided that happens'" I tink e's got it, I tink e's got it.
@Roper122 ye im going crazy over that guy Tomfynn, He don't know how to debate constantly changing subjects ignoring the real argument points, in the end he ran away. But now if your so " normal " Mr. Science what ever. perhaps you can explain how this is possible.
@Roper122 To this day in state of the Art labs´ they cannot even create the simplest form of living matter from non-living matter, While in Nature, completely unguided that happens in the Prehistoric Magical soup.
There are even 2 Evolution's (mutations) simultaneously both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " that are able to interbreed, That is impossible.
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
@acejack3065 ...You do understand that was all that was needed, right? If you want to watch the whole thing just look him up, don't judge him by his simple yet beautiful reply. That would be very ignorant.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
@acejack3065 - It deserved the applause because it was witty and honest. If there's one thing you gotta appreciate, it is that it's pointless to be politically correct.
Did that really deserve all those applause? No wonder people are willing to believe that the earth is 5000 years old when they see this level of arrogance from a room full of atheists.
Proper arguements will always be more sucessful than this self congratulation.
@acejack3065 Indeed. Albeit these people are atheists, that does not automatically make them any less weak-minded or pathetic than the religious. The majority of any population always seem to indulge in this type of self-congratulating/reassuring tribalistic nonsense.
@acejack3065 It deserved all the applause. Because he was 100% correct. And people willing to believe that the earth is 5000 years old simply do not deserve anything else than ridicule.
Proper arguments are wasted on those willing to delude themselves.
@acejack3065 Proper arguments are lost on those who base their entire existence on faith anyway. As far as anyone turning away from reason to religion because they see an atheist being a bit of a jerk, well, you can't say that they really care about how they view the world anyway if they choose it by which representative seems like a more respectful or politically correct person.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 That is logic ! Glad their is a few people able to search for the real truth, and not just say " Everything came from nothing, & lets just assume that when the universe sprang into existence it must have done so full of some kind of energy "
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
@Mogley52 Intelligent? If you could make your own people, planets, seas, animals, etc... would you make life so they can live unfairly and pointlessly like what you see today? For your own sake please say no.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, etc., etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Lol why would he say yes and give credit to his opposition. Theres video's all over the place of him being stumped, stutterin and askin for the cameras to be turned of while he thinks of an answer,
@Cloudstrife112233 ...There's two debates, I'd also recommend watching " lying for Jesus " on YouTube. You're welcome to your opinion, and I'm happy to back up my statements, but the evidence is all there.
this man used to tell you ' a higher force created man' in his younger years-clearly no-one else cares enough to remember but are simply swept along with his lies
Dawkins was asked on live tv in Ireland does he get presents for his grandchildren at Christmas he said he does. She told him he is a hypocrite agree.
@lovelyday002 " Dawkins was asked on live tv in Ireland does he get presents for his grandchildren at Christmas he said he does. She told him he is a hypocrite agree. "
- Why? christians argue violently against santa and now you're saying it's the true meaning of Xmas? Which way do you want it?
Show me the bible verse that directs people to give presents at Xmas?... if not.. careful with that hypocrite accusation.
@Comment276 To be fair that is not true, Christmas is very obviously christian - "Christ-mas" is hardly likely to have been used by pagans. The timing of this christian holiday is likely (most probably) chosen as a result of a pagan holiday that happens at the same time though. But this doesn't make Christmas pagan, it is christian, only whatever pagans "celebrated" was pagan (I cant remember what the pagan holiday was about)..
@wyterabitt You are somewhat right, first of all you should have looked the word origin in countries of ancient Europe. In my own country (Portugal) Christmas is pronounced "Natal", and in it's origins, which is Latin, is "nātālis" which means "Birth", and it's not the birth of Jesus, but the birth of the sun god, which there was a lot in that time. The expression used before christianity says "Dies Natalis Solis Invicti" which means "The birth of the invictus sun".
@fglp666 Really, Christmas is a Catholic holiday. and if you do a study of many Catholic holidays, they were based very closely on pagan holidays so that they could "bring more people into the church. now this doesn't mean that the holidays are not Christian now, but their roots are pagan. many Christians today are actually throwing off these holidays and going back to the Biblical ones, since they have more meaning for us.
churp.
RexisAZero 3 hours ago
haha this is great, I laugh at the comment sections on this type of video... always full of retarded religous nutjobs. You don't see athetists all up in your religous videos now do you
hjrnz 3 hours ago
"NO"
behnamasid 4 hours ago
I swear the guy at 35 seconds is Al Davis, the late great owner of the Oakland Raiders football team.
Dinkadude 8 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My comments effectively combine as Checkmate. Those who understand fundamental logic easily recognize arguing against the facts I have presented, is to argue on behalf of insanity, lying & deception. What I have written is not a clever argument, it is the simple Truth in simple terms, which sane people understand. My argument is supported by Fundamental Logic, which is predicated on a fundamental commitment to the Truth.
Atheists/Satanists are self proven fundamentally insane, lying frauds.
waketheoblivious 11 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Logic is an online textbook that explains fundamental logic. The basis of the human logic and belief structure, is a fundamental commitment to the Truth (ONLY SANE CHOICE), which inherently expands to include all possibilities.
"Logic, an online textbook by Garth Kemerling, explains the basic elements of elementary logic, at an undergraduate level."
Fail the truth (INSANE) or sustain a commitment to the truth (SANE). Atheist/Satanists are fundamentally insane, lying frauds.
waketheoblivious 11 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (only sane choice), inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themselves fundamentally insane liars & frauds. When Atheist/Satanists dismiss God as a possibility, they breach their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
Atheist/Satanists = Godforsaken Nazis
waketheoblivious 11 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
History of diabolical "missing link" frauds. Atheist/Satanists posing as scientists:
1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Manufactured Planted Evidence
Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth
Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils
Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster
Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone
2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification
2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil
*Evolution, science of a preponderance of bullshit, in lieu of irrefutable evidence.
waketheoblivious 11 hours ago
He just says "NO" and they applaud for 26 seconds. They may be Atheists but they seem to think he's infallible no matter what he says and seem to venerate him like a God.
KrackowKid 20 hours ago
@KrackowKid hes become the big guy in 'new atheism' which simply means that us atheists sort of started talking publicly and discussing a lot more (not burning anybody, not cutting our daughters genitals off). I think new atheism was/is a reaction to 9/11 and the major rise in passions from muslims and christians around that time. Dawkins and others just took a stand and said 'lets think'. Inspiring guy and infinately cleverer than any preacher, but yeah its possible to go overboard for anyone
martinmerrywinkle 7 hours ago
Of course he hasn't. He's beyond convincing.
arnoldlayne1991 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@arnoldlayne1991 Of course he hasn't. No-one as clever as he is could ever be convinced by the utter drivel spouted by the theists and their young-earth, creationist twat offspring.
MasterAtheistic 23 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@arnoldlayne1991 " Of course he hasn't. He's beyond convincing. "
- Oh really? Is that why he never says that he is 100% atheist, and he repeats that scientists must be open to new discoveries?
Roper122 22 hours ago
The atheist Delusion!
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
1tabligh 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1tabligh - OR
How could all of the theists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero ( and actually comes from scientists ), when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
See how easy that was?
Roper122 1 day ago
@1tabligh
You forgot to mention that pseudoscience is a really fun branch of science!
YAY!
MegaSensimilla 1 day ago
@MegaSensimilla Before he enters the realm of science and knowledge with all its concerns, man is able to perceive certain truths by means of these innate perceptions. But after entering the sphere of science and philosophy and filling his *brain* with various proofs and deductions, he may forget his natural and innate perceptions or begin to doubt them. It is for this reason that when man moves beyond his innate nature to delineate a belief, differences begin to appear.
1tabligh 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1tabligh
"Before he enters the realm of science and knowledge with all its concerns, man is able to perceive certain truths by means of these innate perceptions."
Rationalism does not always precede empiricism in human beings. I have no idea how you came up with such a retarded proposition.
MegaSensimilla 1 day ago
@1tabligh Wait, wait, you're saying atheist scientists aren't allowed to claim God isn't real, and by extension claim to know the universe inside-out, and what the purpose of mankind is?
Vulgarth1 23 hours ago
@Vulgarth1 The atheist Delusion!
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
1tabligh 22 hours ago
@1tabligh Stop copy pasting and explain what you're babbling about.
Vulgarth1 18 hours ago
@Vulgarth1 Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *unknowing and unperceiving *, is his creator and that of all beings?
No?
Then how can the duped atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and *believe* that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
1tabligh 12 hours ago
@1tabligh Behold! The idiotic witterings of the deliberately blind and foolish theist. Please go and do some research, even just watching YouTube videos on science and cosmology might help someone as pitiful as you.
MasterAtheistic 1 hour ago
@MasterAtheistic The idiotic witterings of the deliberately blind and foolish theist.
___
Poor fella!
Talking like 6 years old kid!
How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
1tabligh 49 minutes ago
@1tabligh
LOL idiot why dont you go back to the scum muslim third world hole you come from?
Oh thats right because it fucking sucks shit. even a retarded muslim wouldnt want to live there!
BTW stupid you dont even know what the question was, try listening or are you that stupid? (3rd world muslim quite possibly)
gorilla199uncensored 3 hours ago
@gorilla199uncensored LOL idiot...BTW stupid you dont...
___
Poor fella!
Talking like 6 years old kid!
Hiding your ignorance and arrogance behind your stupid pretext of "..LOL idiot...BTW stupid you dont..."!
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
If self-procreation took place at first, in accordance with certain laws and decrees, as water is produced due to a certain chemical
1tabligh 25 minutes ago
@gorilla199uncensored composition between oxygen and hydrogen, it becomes necessary for it to be repeated in accordance with those laws and decrees, as the existence of water is repeated whenever certain chemical factors are present, whether or not water is necessary; for necessity in the natural sense is merely the necessity produced by the laws and decrees of nature. What then made those laws and decrees different?
How is that for YOUR "fucking sucks shit"?!
1tabligh 23 minutes ago
Such a beautiful word :')
Tfrancoalejandro 1 day ago
SO BRAEV
dennison1094 1 day ago
@MrCoolone05
In response to your last comment:
Australopithecus afarensis, Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo erectus...
Time to crack open a book.
SpaceOdyssey56 2 days ago
@SpaceOdyssey56 Love Grace Mercy Forgiveness Salvation Eternal life..Time to crack open a book.
MrCoolone05 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCoolone05 Genocide, rape, genital mutilation, human sacrifice, theft of land, murder, mass extinctions, random violence, hatred, vile nonsense, looks like someone opened the Holly Bibble!
MasterAtheistic 2 days ago
@MasterAtheistic All the acts of men none of it from God.
MrCoolone05 1 day ago
@MasterAtheistic All the acts of men none of it from God.
MrCoolone05 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCoolone05 Err, all the acts of men COMMANDED to carry them out by your vicious, malevolent, psychotic Gob Yahweh in the Old Testicle, sorry Testament. Funny how you retarded Bibble Thumpers manage to pick and choose the bits you want to believe in the Bibble but totally forget those unfortunate and rather disgusting parts that tend to prove that either;
A: Your Gob is a fucking nutter
OR
B: He never existed and was made up by greedy, immoral men for their own evil reasons.
I plump for B!
MasterAtheistic 1 day ago
@MasterAtheistic Youve got a fantastic sense of humour.It.s only natural that believers would want to focus on the nice side to God.You would make a great christian I hope you discover his boundless grace one day.Gob bless you I mean God bless you.
MrCoolone05 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCoolone05 I was a Chwistian and doubt I will ever succumb to such idiocy again. The only possibility of that happening would be if Yeshua bar Joseph did actually materialise on earth and performed real and verifiable miracles, raised the newly deceased, parted the Red Sea perhaps and stopped all war, famine, and suffering. Can't see that happening. Even then the question would be 'where the bloody hell have you been, look at all the suffering you have allowed you selfish, silly barsteward!'
MasterAtheistic 1 day ago
@MasterAtheistic None of those horrible things will exist when Jesus returns to set up his kingdom on earth so theres a wonderful hope for mankind.I knew there was something likeable about you God said I will never leave you nor forsake you.you maybe dissapointed in God but he still has a deep concern for your life,remember once a chwistian allways a chwistian march on to victory bro.
MrCoolone05 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCoolone05 Sorry to disappoint you but I will NEVER be a religious person again. I know too much about the real history of Yeshua bar Joseph to ever expect him to return in any form at all, never mind as some sort of savioury snack of mankind. He may well have survived the cross as he was cut down quickly. His wealthy father may have bribed the Romans, thus explaining his 'resurrection' but he never survived Masada where the dreams of the Zealots died & an elderly Yeshua bar Joseph with them.
MasterAtheistic 1 hour ago
@MrCoolone05
The hypocrite is yourself. If you believe that right and wrong are decided by God, then, hypothetically, if God were to suddenly decide that murder is OK, then it would become morally acceptable. In fact, since God himself appears to rely solely on fallible human beings to do his speaking for him, his followers have often felt he made exceptions to the sixth commandment, from Moses and Joshua, to the Crusaders and Inquisition, to those who fly planes into buildings on his behalf.
SpaceOdyssey56 2 days ago
@SpaceOdyssey56 Those people who flew the planes into the twin towers worship a different god to me my God is the King of all Glory Jesus of Nazereth.
MrCoolone05 2 days ago
@MrCoolone05 Where exactly was/is Nazareth again?
nontrainspotter 2 days ago
@nontrainspotter It.s not that important where he grew up whats important is the fact that he came into this world on a rescue mission to redeem mankind.where countless millions have found refuge in that name.You go to a mechanic to get your car fixed so go to the saviour to get your soul saved..simple really.God bless you.
MrCoolone05 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCoolone05 Hahahahahaha, what a redneck fuckwit!
MasterAtheistic 2 days ago
@MasterAtheistic A redneck is someone who is from America Im Australian and weve all been f***wits at onestage or another...You could never come close to insulting me as much as my own father has and guess what I love him now thats VICTORY...
MrCoolone05 1 day ago
@MrCoolone05
The "myth" of evolution that you speak of is your own MYTHconception of it. In evolutionary terms, there is no "higher" and "lower"; a jellyfish and a lion are both well adapted to their respective environments; a fact that you would be aware of if you had ever read Richard Dawkins.
SpaceOdyssey56 2 days ago
@SpaceOdyssey56 Yes quite a clever response but evolution if it were true could easily be proven why is it that scientists allways find bones of apes or bones of men never the bones of apeman maybe it.s because they dont exist. But yeh good on you for being mature about this matter.
MrCoolone05 2 days ago
Poor Rhichard Dawkins he and all the other deluded atheists stiill beleiving in the evolution myth If he was a true intellect he would,ve come to the conclusion that if evolution were true than the most evolved and advanced creature allready exsists...What is it it.s a jelly fish or a jelly blubber. It cant die of lung cancer it,s got no lungs maybe a heart attack sorry no heart.And it knows where it,s going but has,nt got any eyes.God is truely wondeful,
MrCoolone05 2 days ago
thank god for dawkins... oops i ment thank evelution for dawkins
rkfool 2 days ago
Epic Richard Dawkins is epic!!!
MrAdixzaitz 2 days ago
Listen to me atheists! You will go to HELL. Believe or not, God exists, hell is real. If you don't believe the existence of him, he will send you to hell. You will BURN IN THE LAKE OF THE FIRE ETERNALLY!! No one will help you. Now! Evolution is a GREAT LIE! Science is a liberal conspiracy. Scientists are satanic atheists who wants to destroy our values. No matter what you think. Hell is REAL! Believe before you die, or burn in hell. God will NEVER forgive you!
freandwhickquest 2 days ago
@freandwhickquest i'm sure god will have MUCH better reasons to send me to hell then for simply not believing. And if his commandments have anything to do with it you'll probably be right there beside me regardless of your beliefs.
BringerOfD 2 days ago
@freandwhickquest Obvious troll is obvious...
brainboxj 2 days ago 2
What could the other side possibly say to argue against reality?
lc237 3 days ago 12
@lc237 Richard Dawkins hypocrite doesnt beleive in God but believes in the law where did the law come from but God so if you believe in the law then you believe in God because the law came from God so in reality there are no real atheists a real atheist woud reject the law...We cant have that now can we...LOL.
MrCoolone05 2 days ago
@lc237 You mean the Reality that Nothing exploded into everything, then afterwards the planets formed, then the earth was like the moon, and it rained on rocks for billions of years, then it became a soup where Non-living matter turned into Living matter and then came Evolution, Then Fish actually started feeling the need to breathe air and crawled on land, and the human being both male and female are 2 different evolution's, that can breed ( all i just said were unproven )
mukkohaha 2 days ago
@lc237 To this day in´ State of the art labs, and hundreds years of research done by the brightest minds in the world, and they still cant create living matter out of non living matter, but this happens unguided in the nature by sheer chance ?
The second law of Thermodynamics state " Energy cannot be created or destroyed " Then where did the Energy come from ? What fueled the big bang ? Where does the energy come from that makes the electrons circle the nucleus forever ?
mukkohaha 2 days ago
@mukkohaha "The second law of Thermodynamics state " Energy cannot be created or destroyed "" You obviously don't know shit about science. Conservation of energy is the *first* law of thermodynamics.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn Your right it's the first law thank you for correcting me.
" U wrong " It's spelled Your wrong, your obviously word blind, and Retarded.
Now when we are done with Throwing mud, would you please make a real reply ? or just shut up and don't waste my time, If it's the 1st or 2nd law, was not the real point, do you think i remember that stuff in my head perfectly, clearly i just barely missed.
Childish bigotry is your hobby perhaps ?
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha The point was that U are ignorant of science to an embarrassing degree and are just flinging Big Words around, trying to sound impressive. U get away with that in Sunday school, in science U actually have to know what U are talking about.
Mudslinging? No. Calling your bluff? Yes.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@lc237 In state of the Art labs they cannot even creating the simplest form of living matter, While in Nature' There are 2 Evolution's ongoing that both make a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " You gotta be a naive person with no ability to think for yourself to believe that this happens unguided in nature.
Macro evolution is only, Mutations that improves the living entity according to Survival of the fittest. other than that it's completely random
mukkohaha 2 days ago
@lc237 But this "Evolution" must create a male and a female of each, so they can reproduce, And Evolution dossn't have a mind of it's own, It's just Mistakes in the DNA / genome that can be either advantageous or disadvantageous.
To this day countless studies have been made with Flies' where they mutate them, Their haven't been 1 single account of a " good " mutation, most of them are fatal. the rest is freaks of nature. even Dawkins knows this-
mukkohaha 2 days ago
@mukkohaha "Their haven't been 1 single account of a " good " mutation" U wrong. Inform yourself on the experiments by Richard Lenski on E. coli.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn I just informed myself on the experiments by Richard Lenski on E. Coli
That doesn't prove anything. Do you understand that a fish's lung system doesn't work on land, Why would it slowly evolve lungs that could'n breathe water while still swimming ? And hopefully you do also understand that the exact Fish Both male and Female had to do 2 Different Mutations simultaneously that were at all times interbreed able, and then magically crawl on land. naive ;)
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha "That doesn't prove anything" Ah, the old trick of making up more bullshit, when the old bullshit has been called.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn you made me laugh their :D You have ignored every major point i said in the about 5-6 replies, Except when i mixed up 1st / 2nd law.
Now i'm going to repeat myself, and see if your going to keep ignoring.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha Major point? The 747 analogy is a fallacy that even has it's own wiki, your ramblings about fishes is the purest form of bullshit west of Shit Creek, U obviously did not understand the point of the E.Coli experiment - demonstrating that there are beneficial mutations, contrary to your claim, your understanding of science is laughable and now U are running away.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn you are running away, How much in denial can a person be ?
mukkohaha 1 day ago
Comment removed
mukkohaha 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TomFynn In state of the Art labs they cannot even create the simplest form of living matter from non-living matter, While in Nature' There is 2 Evolution's ongoing that make both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations "
Just having 2 Simultaneously Evolution s of Interbreed-able beings is a miracle greater then you can comprehend, but clearly in Nature that stuff happens all the time by sheer random chance, roll of the dice.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@TomFynn That stuff doesn't happen, any person capable of critical thinking ( being able to think, NOT only being able to repeat a book like a parrot ) knows that stuff like that don't happen in nature by random chance.
A tornado sweeping through a junk yard would have a much better chance of assembling a fully operational Boeing 757, " but if we wait long enough even that will happen " That's the Naive retarded way of thinking of modern science what a joke.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha Ah, the 747 fallacy. Still alive in these days. Told U, U have no clue about science. Do try to look up what evolution actually is, instead of just parroting what your preacher-man tells U.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn Boeing 757 not 747, What a retard you must be, did you have a hard time learning to read ?
Mud throwing sure is fun, Glad you taught me a valuable lesson.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha Unfortunately for U, the original fallacy originating supposedly by Hoyle and generally argued in creatard circles is the *747* fallacy. But thanks for pointing out that you are incapable of even getting the name of your own fallacies right.
Or did U invent a new fallacy all on your own? If yes, congrats.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn What a Sad person you are :D hahahahah :D:D:D: HAHAH XD ^^ it's beyond me the bigotry :D
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha So U ran out of arguments. Already? Oh, yes, U never had any from the beginning.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn you * get it right, your spelling is as flawed as your logic.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
Comment removed
mukkohaha 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mukkohaha "There are even 2 Evolution's (mutations) simultaneously both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " that is able to interbreed, That is impossible." Learn to form intelligible sentences.
"While in Nature, completely unguided that happens'" I tink e's got it, I tink e's got it.
TomFynn 1 day ago
@TomFynn hahahaha YOU RAN AWAY, Like a scared little mouse with no explanation on your hand buuuhuuuu haha ^^
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha .. uh oh... crazy alert.
Roper122 1 day ago
@Roper122 ye im going crazy over that guy Tomfynn, He don't know how to debate constantly changing subjects ignoring the real argument points, in the end he ran away. But now if your so " normal " Mr. Science what ever. perhaps you can explain how this is possible.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@mukkohaha ... I've just read back... and he's right.. you just ran out of arguments.
Roper122 1 day ago
@Roper122 I'm gonna play along with you and Tomfynn
Your wrong you just ran out of arguments.
( see what i am doing here ? Just stating random shit like you 2 )
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@Roper122 Don't run away, haha you failed you ran out of arguments,
mukkohaha 1 day ago
Comment removed
mukkohaha 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Roper122 To this day in state of the Art labs´ they cannot even create the simplest form of living matter from non-living matter, While in Nature, completely unguided that happens in the Prehistoric Magical soup.
There are even 2 Evolution's (mutations) simultaneously both a Male and Female, which is two different " Mutations " that are able to interbreed, That is impossible.
It will not happen unguided in nature.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@TomFynn Go watch X-man Evolution or Transformers or something, that would make great entertainment for someone of your mental caliber.
mukkohaha 1 day ago
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
Now, go back and Watch X-man ;)
mukkohaha 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
Now, go back and Watch X-man ;)
mukkohaha 2 days ago
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
Now, go back and Watch X-man ;)
mukkohaha 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lc237 Only the exact same kind can Reproduce, then first a male has to mutate, then perfectly on it's side their has to be a female Evolution that' completely fit the requirements for reproduction which is another evolution on it's own.
And remember Evolution are ONLY mistakes and depletion in the Genome also called mutation, That has to leave the affected creature in a better shape for Survival of the fittest.
Now, go back and Watch X-man ;)
mukkohaha 2 days ago
Intelligent debate is better than "No + applause". Just saying.
acejack3065 3 days ago
@acejack3065 ...You do understand that was all that was needed, right? If you want to watch the whole thing just look him up, don't judge him by his simple yet beautiful reply. That would be very ignorant.
Nukr666 3 days ago
@acejack3065
Er, I think Richard Dawkins has had many an "intelligent debate".
In fact, the man's question literally began with: "You have done debates all around the world."
machine120 3 days ago
@acejack3065
Have you ever stuck an apple in your anus?
cergzor 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
Mogley52 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 3 days ago
@acejack3065 - It deserved the applause because it was witty and honest. If there's one thing you gotta appreciate, it is that it's pointless to be politically correct.
DrYashArya 3 days ago 7
Did that really deserve all those applause? No wonder people are willing to believe that the earth is 5000 years old when they see this level of arrogance from a room full of atheists.
Proper arguements will always be more sucessful than this self congratulation.
acejack3065 4 days ago
@acejack3065 Indeed. Albeit these people are atheists, that does not automatically make them any less weak-minded or pathetic than the religious. The majority of any population always seem to indulge in this type of self-congratulating/reassuring tribalistic nonsense.
ytfmichaelxu 4 days ago
@acejack3065 wait what??? O.o
00movieman00 4 days ago
@acejack3065 even if it was the honest answer? succinct and to the point?
Angaraman 3 days ago
Comment removed
TomFynn 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@acejack3065 It deserved all the applause. Because he was 100% correct. And people willing to believe that the earth is 5000 years old simply do not deserve anything else than ridicule.
Proper arguments are wasted on those willing to delude themselves.
TomFynn 3 days ago
@acejack3065 Its easy to become that arrogant when you see the a world inhabited by idiots
PablotheFEAR 3 days ago
@acejack3065 Because an argument becomes more convincing with the obnoxiousness of its opponents?
SaaErDetNok 3 days ago
Comment removed
cergzor 3 days ago
@acejack3065 Proper arguments are lost on those who base their entire existence on faith anyway. As far as anyone turning away from reason to religion because they see an atheist being a bit of a jerk, well, you can't say that they really care about how they view the world anyway if they choose it by which representative seems like a more respectful or politically correct person.
ScionAscendant 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 days ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 days ago
@Mogley52 That is logic ! Glad their is a few people able to search for the real truth, and not just say " Everything came from nothing, & lets just assume that when the universe sprang into existence it must have done so full of some kind of energy "
mukkohaha 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 4 days ago
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 4 days ago
@Mogley52 Intelligent? If you could make your own people, planets, seas, animals, etc... would you make life so they can live unfairly and pointlessly like what you see today? For your own sake please say no.
igormiguel 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 days ago
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, etc., etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 4 days ago
A man of many words!! Well done Prof Dawkins.
CombatRocks 4 days ago
Lol why would he say yes and give credit to his opposition. Theres video's all over the place of him being stumped, stutterin and askin for the cameras to be turned of while he thinks of an answer,
AlexiusMoore 5 days ago
@Cloudstrife112233 ...There's two debates, I'd also recommend watching " lying for Jesus " on YouTube. You're welcome to your opinion, and I'm happy to back up my statements, but the evidence is all there.
Roper122 5 days ago
this man used to tell you ' a higher force created man' in his younger years-clearly no-one else cares enough to remember but are simply swept along with his lies
mamamonster2011 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mamamonster2011 " this man used to tell you ' a higher force created man' in his younger years "
- You used to crap in your nappy in your younger years, no one seems to care about that either.
( although it's entirely possible you still do )
Roper122 6 days ago
Brilliant
MrWhingeypants 1 week ago
dont get it?
BeatriceHaw13 1 week ago
No!... that's it
Srum31 1 week ago
the guy standing next to him at 0:30 should so have gone in for a high five to make that moment even better :)
MrGregoryKershaw 1 week ago
@MrGregoryKershaw They're gentlemen so they shook hands. ;)
LordKryn 1 week ago
@LordKryn Very true I didn't spot that I wonder if he has ever been doing so well that he considered crowd surfing :)
MrGregoryKershaw 1 week ago
@MrGregoryKershaw Hahah that'd be something worth seeing.
He's too much of a gentleman and intellectual to do it however. :p
LordKryn 1 week ago
Probably the greatest use of the word "No" I have ever experienced in my life.
Gundogdogdog 1 week ago
This guy said one word, and made the audience applaud, but mr bean can make the world laugh without speaking.
Mr Bean rocks more!
BrownCookieBoy 1 week ago
Dawkins was asked on live tv in Ireland does he get presents for his grandchildren at Christmas he said he does. She told him he is a hypocrite agree.
lovelyday002 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lovelyday002 " Dawkins was asked on live tv in Ireland does he get presents for his grandchildren at Christmas he said he does. She told him he is a hypocrite agree. "
- Why? christians argue violently against santa and now you're saying it's the true meaning of Xmas? Which way do you want it?
Show me the bible verse that directs people to give presents at Xmas?... if not.. careful with that hypocrite accusation.
Roper122 1 week ago
@lovelyday002 You do realize that Christmas is a pagan holiday.
Comment276 1 week ago 27
@Comment276 Actually Christams is a Buddhist holiday and originated in Alaska
neilmcintosh5150 1 week ago
@Comment276 and Also. Norwegian, or a Viking tradiotion? called Youl
kebabsalat 6 days ago
@Comment276 To be fair that is not true, Christmas is very obviously christian - "Christ-mas" is hardly likely to have been used by pagans. The timing of this christian holiday is likely (most probably) chosen as a result of a pagan holiday that happens at the same time though. But this doesn't make Christmas pagan, it is christian, only whatever pagans "celebrated" was pagan (I cant remember what the pagan holiday was about)..
wyterabitt 6 days ago
@wyterabitt You are somewhat right, first of all you should have looked the word origin in countries of ancient Europe. In my own country (Portugal) Christmas is pronounced "Natal", and in it's origins, which is Latin, is "nātālis" which means "Birth", and it's not the birth of Jesus, but the birth of the sun god, which there was a lot in that time. The expression used before christianity says "Dies Natalis Solis Invicti" which means "The birth of the invictus sun".
fglp666 6 days ago
@fglp666 Really, Christmas is a Catholic holiday. and if you do a study of many Catholic holidays, they were based very closely on pagan holidays so that they could "bring more people into the church. now this doesn't mean that the holidays are not Christian now, but their roots are pagan. many Christians today are actually throwing off these holidays and going back to the Biblical ones, since they have more meaning for us.