Added: 2 years ago
From: insanekillamonster1
Views: 6,555,821
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21,783)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to answer your final question. no please, you shouldn't.

  • this isnt a movie mistake you fucking idiot

  • and when it crashed its shields went down derr

    

  • Everyone who has played Battlefront 2 for example knows that the neck is the critical point of an AT-AT thingy

  • Whole series (6 movies) is a mistake!

  • @zoroaster1973 wow dont be a troll -_-

  • THE NECK IS THE WEAK SPOT!

  • the fall disabled its shield generator?

  • he said the armors to strong and they destroyed it when it was down with 3 shots

  • I like boobs

    

  • 'time of my life was wasted from you trying to sound intelligent while really every movie from that time had flaws, the only BAD flaw here is the one that your mother made when she got knocked up and gave birth to you. should I say more?!

  • you have stolen vaders lightsaber

  • hey even jedi are wrong from time to time

  • Comment removed

  • you really want to be killed by a jedi?

  • I am so pissed I just spent a minute of my life here !

  • Always attack your enemy from the the rear if possible. they never cover their asses cause they least expect it. Butt shots would have decimated these mechanical camels

  • They shot in the neck done easy

    

  • i didnt see it...

  • @korochia he said the armour was too strong for blasters. and when it came down 2 blaster shots destroyed it

  • @oHeartZo no shit !

    

  • u know nothing... Neck is the weakest playce on these things. After it falls down, it got a kind of headshot (neckshot) :P

  • 1. This was not made in 2012.

    2. Star Wars is one of the biggest most see movie.

    3. I actully don't see what you see. Maybe you should read the intro on star wars and figur out what year it is. Here is a hint: They got lasers and smale spaceships whitch can fly super fast.

    Like this comment if you like or hate my grammar :D

  • I like the lightsaber comment. This vid is a piece of sh1t

  • @:32 was that uncle ted, ted nugent??

  • I mean every normal person knows that after you attack a bearformed druid for so long, their durability on their armor goes down, thus giving us others a chance to gank him. Thanks!

  • the darkside is strong with this one

  • how dear you pick on Star Wars? and how was this the worst movie mistake ever? have you not seen twilight?

  • @TheBootamp youre right!

  • If you actually look closely you can see the armor spliting when it falls.

  • huh I see Lord Vader's lightsaber ...

  • this was an impressive movie for its time

  • When the ATAT falls over, it exposes its neck which has no armour.

  • The Maked the big walkers with small model the samllest is only 1-2centimeters tall!

  • Nigger the neck if an atat is prone to blaster fire. It's it's weakness

  • Gladiator and Troy, should i say more?

    and +1 to Narfmaster

  • hope you die

  • If you want to be really picky, you could say that that final blaster shot went into the neckline of the Walker- as in the weak spot between the moving head and the main body. Looking at the schematics, (see Wookiepedia) it's a flexible tunnel, which by its nature should be less armoured than the rest of it. That explains why the second shot did nothing when it hit the head, (the first shot hit the snow) but the third short hit the weak point and combined with the sudden fall and etc etc /thread

  • @Narfmaster I didn't even look into the Wookiepedia, but that was my thinking when watching this... The Story wins!

  • ...Whut? o___ò

  • When the machine fell down, lose him protector field and then it's vulnerable,

  • yes good sir, I do believe that you would have to "say more" ... because I am not sure what the mistake is...

  • Starwars movies are full of scientific flaws. Why is this one worse? Laser beams making sound in space? Laser beams making sounds at all? Light sabers which use crystals the generate power to repel blaster shots that come from the same crystal sources. And btw whats the battery lifespan on a blaster or a saber? Maybe if I read the books it would make more sense but honestly I do not watch starwars to gain insight on technology that doesn't exist. Starwars is more fantasy to me then sci fi.

  • @Reclused5 Star Wars is Sci-Fi/Fantasy. If you have comcast and they put on star wars on the bottom its gonna say Sci-Fi/Fantasy

  • @Reclused5 The lightsaber uses a containment field which allows the beam to loop round back into the lightsaber, this means that it only really uses a significant amount of power when cutting things. The lightsaber batteries can be charged by the movement of the hilt, so they don't run out of power. They also have to be wielded by force users, which implies that their operation is improved by the force.

  • @Gmaster5x Cool I figured it would have to be some sort of field to give it the rounded shape and I figured force would empower it. I did also see how blasters seem to sit in the belt like a recharger. So the containment field also keeps things out thus allowing them to repel blaster attacks. I honestly think most of the flaws in the original movie are just cinematics of the era. Everything you shoot turns into a firecracker.

  • but its not too string for luke too have thrown a grenade in it

  • @skelingtonbass I know right! Walkers suck!

  • o is that a ligthsaber? never mind its the dislike bar.

  • @VOLTZNORD8S8S Oh is that original? never mind it's a douchebag.

  • heh, one time armor is too strong for blasters and other time blasters shoot it? ahem, at-at is fall down, and armor broke, so blasters can break it, but you are observant

    P.S Sorry for BAD English

  • Actually, it was that they shot at the "neck", which doesn't have armor plating.

  • Well, the weak neck joint on AT-ATs become somewhat "lore", and even carried through into later video games.

    Many hours spent on Star Wars Battlefront II game, where on the Hoth map, your always shot speeder blasters, ground rockets, ground gun emplacements...EVERYTHING, into the side of the neck of AT-ATs to kill them fast.

  • no, dont say more.. I would quit posting any other videos

  • indeed, it IS a bit strange^^

  • You are just fucking retarded.

  • Hoth was an inside job jeez...

  • @DarkestEdenOfficial the emperor could do anything for a big amount of imperial credits...

  • If you watch closely they hit the unprotected neck area.

  • its basic nerd nerd nerd that nerd nerd all nerd nerd nerd. at nerds are.

    I cant do it

  • I think the mistake was making an advanced force with flying machines/laser/space ships attack using giant slow walking armored... dogs? Which came from where exactly?

  • first said "it's so strong for blasters" and then the blasters destroy it

  • @star1999ish No, he said the Armour was too strong for blasters, but when it fell over the weak neck joint was exposed, allowing the blaster shot to penetrate the vehicle and possibly set off a chain reaction in it's power core.

  • holy shit! they blew that thing to kingdom come!!! did not know that those blasters were nuclear and yet it did not penetrate the first time.

  • @auomauom The blasters didn't do anything at first because the Armour is too thick, but when it falls over the neck joint is revealed, which is easy to shoot through. The massive explosion is due to one of three reasons. 1: It is an old film, and making a partial explosion that leaves a wreck would cost a huge amount of money. 2: It has a reactor core for power, which was hit and set off a chain reaction. 3: Dramatic effect.

  • I just whatched Paranormal Activity 2 and in the end it said it was all true what they had filmed, and right 10 seconds after that the credits come and it says who directed it, wrote it, produced it etc. I call THAT a mistake.

  • Used to have the game on Atari. There is a weak spot at the top. Like an air vent or something.

    Not bad editing at all. Do some SW Homework and you will see for yourself...

  • Quick Fact:

    The General guy in the AT-ST was the same guy who played Donovan from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

  • love the "one" man charge at 0:34

  • I find their lack of editing disturbing.

  • i wish star wars had another video game with call of duty like graphics and bf3 maps, i loved those games

  • The planet Hoth was named after German general Hermann Hoth, a legendary WWII panzer commander.

  • @TeutonicMachine and he also had the mysterious power to shit snowballs

  • I thought the worst movie mistake happened in the Happening...And the Mistake was making it.

  • Exsactly what I thought when I watched it

  • The line should be, "That armors too strong for blasters... unless we trip it."

  • Okay, if you REALLY need to have a valid, in universe answer, here you go. Notie that the last set of shots from the snowspeeder, the ones that make it explode, one of them goes into the gap between the head and body, where there is obviously a joint for the head to swivel, and thus less armored than the rest of the vehicle. So, the blaster can penetrate and cause damage. Lawyered. However, this fact simply serves to illuminate the fact that the rebel pilots suck at aiming.

  • I can explain this.........it's NOT REAL!!!!

  • il est dit, dans le livre "l'empire contre attaque" que les impériaux procèdent à l'autodestruction du at-at ! de plus je partage l'avis de "liquéfaction" ! la nuque des at-ats constitue un point faible que les speeders mettent à profits lors de la chute !!!

  • no he says that ARMOR as in the plating around the at at walker "basic" sci fi is basic

  • I thought you were going to point out the flopping head of the crash dummy when Lukes snowspeeder hit the ground. THAT was ridiculous.

  • Luke used the force... obviously

    .

  • They got it in an unarmored area aft of the head, dorsal. 

  • they got it in the neck but they could but before they couldent get it

    

  • school boy error, shields fail upon walker falling..fucking trekkie put this up.

  • Cover me, Porkins.

  • nice lightsaber.....o_O??? ooohhh....is the dislike bar!!! sorry =(

  • @DarthHassassin

    Will i ever see an original comment on youtube again? 

  • Maybe Lukes just stupid... Why doesn't anyone ever assume that?

  • @Sponge3737 Damn that fucking hysterical! Actual lol

  • didn't you ever play the old Atari game for Empire? The only way to take down the AT-ATs was to shoot then in the 'shoulders' just above the neck. Its the weak spot. noob

  • I get your point Luke says that the armor is too strong for blasters and they blow the all thing with two shotes of blasters. But to call this the wrost mistake ever.... Beleive me I've seen worst.

  • it didn't shoot the armor, it shot in between.

    so yes.. say more because you asked and now I'm answering. Say more.

  • I am sure George Lucas is furious with you for pointing this out, because now the movie will never be a success.

  • Planet vs bot. Hmm. Planet win.

  • but jar jar binks is the reason I was into all the Star Wars movies and, specially, games! Best comic-relief-ever!

  • Most people never played a star wars game. They hit the joint between the head an the rest of the tank.

    There is a small unarmored part so that the head can move freely. Consider it an mistake from the developer.

  • Well this makes me think Star Wars wasn't a real story now ...

  • Worst movie mistake ever= Justin Bieber Never Say Never

  • The joints man, the joints, just like in football, hit em in the joints or the jock

  • Thank god you were there to catch it.

  • The walker's weakness was in the joints. Between the head and the body, which is exactly where the rebel ship fired.

  • @MonteeeP LOL, as if they couldn't shoot that area before it was tripped.

  • Worst mistake was casting Samuel L (ANGRY) Jackson in a Star Wars movie!!

  • Hey dontcha know all imperial machinery has a weak spot like the Death Star! Hit it just right and blickity blam it will implode!

  • Wow, really? Obviously the weak parts of the armor were above the cockpit but the T-47 airspeeder (aka Snow Speeder) couldn't achieve the altitude to hit it due to the extra weight brought on by the addition of reinforced armor plating. I thought everybody knew that!

    Now the part where the two speeders flew over the cockpit of the walker was a mistake. Obviously Lucas didn't do his home work before writing the script....

  • I we saw that at the movie,The first thing My Buddy said out loud,Hey I thought He Said it was to Strong for Blaster.That made other people star laughing.

  • you cannot post the worst movie mistake on the best movie ever ( Empire Strikes Back)

  • I HATE STARWARS BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOO

  • Cause he shot it in the crack...which is where my boot will go on you if you post another stupid video.

  • I've seen a worse disaster.. Twilight.

  • lol @ people actually discussing this...

  • Booooooo-urns!

  • Where is the mistake? I see nothing wrong there.

  • @PertinenceVF The Armour is too strong so The Blasters cant penetrate BUT! When The Vechile falls SOMEHOW Blasters explode it LOL. The Armour too strong my arse ahahaha

  • @ninjamasterbro

    Apparently you don't know too much about the AT-AT. the quickest way to destroy it is to shoot it in the neck region. Since the head blocks that area, they had to make it fall over so they could shoot at it. There is no mistake made there, there is only someone who knows nothing about Star Wars.

    Checkmate.

  • @PertinenceVF  wow geek

  • never get laid by either discussing or watching this video with a girl

  • @richardthewriter because the hot the weak spot at the neck

  • When it trips, the shields go down. Thus blasters work. Basic sci-fi, bro.

  • @YamiKai They didn't say anything about shields. They said armor, the strength of which should not be indicative of whether or not it's standing. Having said that, this is till a nit picky, whiny fucking video and should never have been made.

  • @mikech78

    It's basic Star Wars knowledge that the Imperial Walkers all have weak spots. AT-STs are weak from underneath, AT-ATs are weak at the neck. Obviously the neck is not exposed with the head in the way, but once it topples the Rogues can attack it. Even as a child seeing this for the first time I was like "oh yeah, i get that. makes sense"

  • @mikech78 They? I only heard one person say it. It did matter that it went down because they had a clearer shot at the weak neck. The real mistake which everyone here keeps overlooking is the wires around the legs are in one shot, then the wires disappear in the very next shot.

  • @YamiKai Tanks are immune to assault rifle fire. Tank gets stuck in ditch, depleted uranium armor doesn't work anymore, assault rifle fire works.

    Basic logic fail, bro.

  • @aegisghost Too bad those aren't assualt rifles, Those are speeder blasters. But cool story, bro

  • @YamiKai He never said anything about shields. "That armor is too strong for blasters." Nice try though.

  • @YamiKai Going off of what you said, you can also see they hit the weakspot in the armor, between the head and the body.

    Hurrdurr

  • @YamiKai yeah, not to mention those shots went right into the things exposed neck, not at the armor

  • @YamiKai

    Possibly, but they said ARMOR not SHIELDS.

  • @YamiKai true dude, but they specifically said Armour, which is different to Shields (Basic English. Bro :)

    i think @Liquefaction has got the right idea. different models, different weak spots, though at the end of the day itd be as obvious as a week spot as the one on the death star and youd wonder why they wouldnt just make the neck out of the same laser proof armour they use on the rest of it (or why they dont use a lil of that armour to plug up the hole on the Death Star for that matter)?

  • @YamiKai if youre over 12 you should not say something like ( Basic sci-fi bro), a remark like this in public could get you pussy drought for years

  • @abelucious ooooo, you called me 12. You must be a smart guy. And you talking about people getting pussy on youtube, just shows me you don't get any.

  • @YamiKai "that ARMOR is too strong for blasters".... energy shields were never mentioned.

  • @xen0f0be Energy sheilds dont have to be mentioned. This is science fiction, and besides. when he said that they were shooting at the hull, when they blow it up he shoots the neck.

  • THEREIS NO FAILURE; WHEN ATT FALLS BECOMES UNARMED AND VULNERABLE IT IS NOT THE CORE ITS DEFENSE SYSTEM...

  • 21st century and WE STILL DONT HAVE AT-AT's!

  • I think you should

  • Luke said that the walkers ARMOUR was too strong for blasters not the joints, totaly different. Luke was talking about the bulk of its hull.

  • top comment has only 25 votes... well i can destroy that. pew pew... destroy them with lazers!!! the dislike baaaaar looks like an evil light saber. BOIIIIING POPTAAAAAAAAAARTs

  • @smaugsDESOLATION Are you like.. 5.. or something?

  • imbecile that´s star wars go kill yourself princess

  • I didn't see anything out-of-order. Please explain.

  • Like this if you think the guy who posted this is an idiot...

  • i still dont get it

  • @JediRonald127 that armour is too strong for blasters (guns used in this movie). So it its too strong for blasters why did it blow up at the end after being shot by blasters?

  • the worst movie mistake is in troy when thare was an airplane behind him in the air

  • dude he shot the weak point and that movie was made in the 70s

  • Re-editing, Jar Jar, the first 3 movies in the trilogy for more money, horrible Lucas Arts video games. Rogue Squadron around 15 years ago was the only game ever to follow movies 4-6. Lucas...just get it over with and let me play a HD next gen game going through IV-VI. Is that right? Sorry Star Wars nerds. This is sad I commented and watched this. Always thought this was a big movie mistake since the 70s-80s when I first saw it.

  • @sawink don't have you have a LOTR dvd you should be watching? christ.. You didn't pay attention, and they talk about the vents in the fucking scene.. you people have no concept of a leading story.. y'know.. how people talk about stuff in a scene that happens before the one you're bitching about ignorantly? the vents are mentioned.

  • these are not the movie mistakes you are looking for, move along, move along.

  • I know! I was also wondering what the hell Alf was doing in that shot! Was it a cameo?

  • this movie was a mistake

    like if you dislike

  • @razors98 Attention whore much?

  • Guys don't you get it?The guy says "The armours to strong for blasters" But the last one they destroy with blasters :P

  • @darksword793 yeah they had to hit the weak spot right behind the "head"

  • Did anyone else see the cable disappear at 0:27

  • Nope... worst mistake was jar jar binks

  • @zebrapenuk oooohhhhhhh snap

  • @zebrapenuk yup

  • @zebrapenuk Who is this jar jar binks ? Is it this "funny" guy planned for the three prequel movies ? What a shame Lucas did not make them...

  • ¿?

    

  • Erm... yeah.

  • The worse movie mistake ever was George Lucas re-editing the original trilogy.

  • i dident see a mistake..i did get a dejavu feeling of how freaking awesome this movie was when i first saw it and how as a kid it was the coolest thing ever..star wars is one of those movies that you dont go looking for errors..you enjoy the awesomeness...

  • WOW Ive never heard so many NERDS Freak out hahahahahahahahahahahahhaahhaa­hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah­ahahhahahahhaahhaahhahahahahah­ahahahhahahahahahahhahahhahhah­ahahahahahhahahahahhaha

  • @Seanerrr Yeah cause you are so cool for watching this clip and talking shit about the people commenting on it. GTFO

  • @retrospectrumify wow go get laid and stop jerking off to pictures of princess leia ya douche

  • mistake.. ? its star wars.. if Luke would ride a freaking horse to destroy an AT-AT with an knife it would be great.. just kidding but you now my point i guess

    by the way i am not that Sw freak but searching for mistakes in movies is not the best kind of hobby...

  • you should say more, I think you cut us out of the funniest joke never created. Need I say more?