REICH PROPAGANDIST REPORTED AS "A PUBLIC DANGER" BY ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE

[phildirt3]

beck is a piece of shit

[kopitetommy]

Beck and Olbermann may have opposing views on social issues, but lets remember guys they are both actors in the media who would never truely take on the powers that be. you control your own movement what at the top of the hierarchy but you also control your opposition.

[ObamaComma]

@kopitetommy - And so this comment opposition the control of both sides by the heirarchy is actually a comment posted by a adjunct co-agitator which is controlled opposition to the control of opposition by the ruling elite?

Look up the BIOs of KEITH OLBERMANN and GLENN BECK, and you will see a vast intellectual, educational and professional difference. One channel actually does use REAL ACTORS on it's news, the other uses REAL JOURNALISTS. Why do you suppose that is?

[rightwayvideo]

It's Amazing Keith Blubberman even has a job. A simple man for a simple network.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Another intellectually bankrupt comment from an intellectually bankrupt ideology with morally bankrupt leaders which have reduced itself to sloganeering and ad hominem insults. Not to mention the appearant hypocrisy of such simplistic comments, complaining about a news network that does not read talking point memos from the Republican party & Karl Rove as its "news"? Amazing comment, thanks for the demo.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma I apologize for sinking to the level of the left, I shall now try to redeem myself. Your use of the word "bankrupt" is most interesting considering the spending of Obama, who has complete control of the federal government. I shall now preempt your retort by stating that Bush was no true conservative. If the ideas of freedom and equal justice which Glenn Beck champions are so dangerous, then why do the countries which espouse the polor opposit always begin and survive on bloodshed.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - We are definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and the economic sphere.

We are opposed to Socialism to which unity within the State (which amalgamates classes into a single economic and ethical reality) is unknown, and which sees in history nothing but the class struggle. We likewise are opposed to trade unionism as a class weapon.

(CONT)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - We reject the absurd conventional lie of political equalitarianism, the habit of collective irresponsibility, the myth of felicity and indefinite progress.

We do not accept that numbers, as such, can be the determining factor in human society; We deny the right of numbers to govern by means of periodical consultations; We assert the irremediable and fertile and beneficent inequality of men who cannot be leveled by any such mechanical and extrinsic device as universal suffrage.

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Those were the words written by Benito Musolini to describe FASCISM. (So I don't know that Latin-American right wing dictatorships actually do espouse the opposite of Glenn Beck)

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Fascism and Communism are the right and the left of big government. If you watched Glenn Beck you would know that he extols the virtues of small government. Only large governments can become tyrannical and have to use mass murder to maintain their power. History has yet to show a truly benevolent large government.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - If I watched Glenn Beck I would be supporting the media empire that is assisting the Chinese government in it's censorship program, it's squelching of western journalism within communist China, and the media mogul responsilbe for the suppression of the Tiananmen square massacre, not to mention funding an organization that uses it's business in communist Cuba as a tax haven to defraud American tax payers. As far as "size of government" goes. (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - No Republican since WW2 has "reduced the size of government" despite all the phoney and deceitful pledges during election time to do so. In fact, the Republican agenda is actually to vastly increased both the size and role of government in the private lives of all Americans. A very cursory examination of what has actually be done by Republicans will reveal the truth of this reality. (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Republicans wish to redefine the role of government into a European "Church-State" (a tragic historical disaster, and an open violation of the American constitution) They wish to extend the role of state ownership to the extreme of regulating the reproductive organs of people, in violation of the Constitution. They wish to use government to dictate the actual "sacrament" of "marriage" in keeping with Roman Catholic definitions. They wish to merge Vatican rule with American gvt

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Despite claims to the contrary, they initiated the "bail-out" program for Banks, set the precedent for "bail-outs" for the auto industry under Ronald Reagan, and continue to increase the size of the Military-Industrial complex (which is the actual real largest cost to the deficit, and the most prevading cause of corruption) as warned by Dwight Eisenhower. They have already merged the private oil business with government on every level, making them indistinguishable (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - And the oil industry (an already immorally profitable business) recieves billions (not millions, but billions) in government "subsidies" (which all Republicans openly indicate they intend to even INCREASE) despite it's damage to the environment, it's destruciton to health, and it's damage to our own national security. Oil dependancy is the greatest threat to America, and has been for 30 years (as anyone really educated on politics actually knows) (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - When you trace the financing in the Republican party, it will always go back to Oil. Even the wars we have been fighting now for a half century, have been using government (and the lives of our own soldiears) to secure supplies for the oil business (which they all are directly involved with financially, down to the personal finances of the candidtates) This has balooned the deficit and led to BANKRUPTCY of the federal government (Before Obama was ever even sworn in)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - So tell me "right way radio", how exaclty do you justify all this as a Limbaugh Republican, I mean completely aside from the open nazi style rejeciton of the Geneve conventions, the adoption of medieval torture programs from the Inquisition, and the communist style treatment of Science? (by the government) they deceptively tell you (and you are dumb enough to believe it) that they wish to "Reduce"?

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Obama's science czar, John Holdren, spoke of the eventual need for the sterilization of the public, through public drinking water.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Politifact rates that claim as "Pants on fire" (in other words, a total fabrication) Look it up.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma It's true that many Republicans are, to one degree or another, Progressive. The only difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that one is going 30 MPH and the other is going 40 MPH. If we are to gain freedom, we must return to the founding principles. A good place to find the founding principles is the book "The 5000 year leap."

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Im familiar with this book's reconstructionist history. I have done my own homework on American history, including reading through the complete Annals of America series published by Encyclopedia Brittanica (original source documents of American political formation). Separaiton of Church and state was a primary foundational principle of religious freedom, designed and implemented by THE RELIGIOUS New England Protestants, who saw it as protection against control by the Vatican

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - This book uses revisionist history to create a fantasy of European style church-State theology, as do most of Becks lunacy arguements, from a disgraced and discredited 1950s anti-communist Mormon Red-Scare fear monger. Those are extremely poor sources for anything.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma I would agree with you, that the separation of church and state is necessary for freedom. However, there does need to be a close bond between God and govt. By this I mean that if the citizen and the politician do not answer to a higher power, then equal justice will never happen. There is only a need for large govt for those who believe there is no God. If God isn't helping you to be a just person, then govt must force you to be. There is no human that can take the place of God.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - The Republican party has not "reduced" the size of government since WW2 and have no plans on "reducing it" in the future. The size of government is always limited by the calls of duty which it must perform. The Democrats have reduced the size of government, 3 of the last 4 presidencies, prior to Obama. War time always increases the size of government, which the Republicans are never against, thus the dichotomy of never being able to actually "reduce" government. (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - The "size" of government is never as important as the "role" of government, which the Republicans wish to vastly increase. From the institution of a Vatican Church-State, to the role of government in enforcing the Roman Sacraments, to the control of the Supreme Court by Roman theology, to the ownership of reproductive process and organs by the state. The Republican agenda is 180 degrees opposite of what they publically claim, even down to the institution of inquisition torture.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Eugenics was a progressive idea supported by Margaret Sanger, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt and George Bernard Shaw. Hitler also Incorporated eugenic ideas in Mien Kampf. Sanger went on to be a founder of planned parenthood, which has murdered millions. Hitler used concentration camps to murder those whom he deemed unfit to reproduce. You notice that there is both a democrat & republican president on that list. progressivism is a disease which both parties carry. cont.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Another distortion of the facts. "Eugenics" is not "Extermination", it is the old word for "Genetics". So Marget Sanger supported "Genetics"? Yes, that is true. She advocated that genetic diseases should not be intentionally passed on, and that birth control be used to stop them from spreading. Most people today, agree with that veiw. Did she support exterminations that you associate with Hitler, no actually she spoke out against them.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma If Margaret Sanger had her way, would you sir, be alive today? By this I mean, who dictates what a genetic disease is. Who decides what value your life holds. Only God can put a value on human life, and He distributes it equally between each and everyone of us. As long as Satan controls this planet, every human being carries a genetic disease.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma So we must look beyond the parties and hold true to the founding principles. As for your statement that it dosn't matter the size of govt but the role, is really absurd considering your claimed level of knowledge. The smaller govt is, the smaller its power is to do good & evil. History shows us that both fascist & communist countries started out really good, at least for some of its citizens, but every time human nature twisted the power into great evil.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - A dictitorial monoarch is a singular man (which can be a very "small government"). The issue is the ROLE government is to play. "Large corporations" that run your "small government", and provide nothing nothing to it's citizenship but licenses of abuse for it's Corporation is worse that "no government" at all. It is legalizing corporate crime. (Which is what the Republican party has been about since the Post-Eisenhower days) As far as your "parties" speech goes, (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Everyone knows how this breaks down, even the people feeding you that speech to parrot. At election time, you will go vote Republican for them, just like they tell you then too.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma The more govt regulates business, the more corruption you have in the political system. By this I mean, the more govt gets involved with business the more business seeks to gain off it. This ofcourse hurts small business which dosn't have the money to compete in crony capitalism, Which big govt regulations create.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma So whether a large govt role may seem just in the beginning, do not be deceived

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Nice speech my boy. Tell that to someone who has not lived through the sixteen years of Reagen-Bush-Bush and saw how that argument gets used to get elected, and then ignored for 16 years (because the simple fact is, war is the single greatest cause of government expansion, and deficit spending by far, and Republicans want to use war to secure oil supplies for their corporate Oil clients) So Republicans will "never".. repeat "never".. reduce the size of government in reality.

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - PS ... and if you are over 25 and are still falling for the same old lie, you are not very smart. At some point you need to realize the size of government will be as big as it needs to be, no matter who is running it. During the great Depression and WW2 the government had to increase, or end up in servitude to Hitler. Then it was reduced (primarily by Democrats)

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma What is the difference between govt that's socially large and one that is large in a militaristic way? None. Progressives that are republican usually want large armies. Progressives that are democrat usually want large social programs. Either concentrates huge power in the federal govt. There has aways been those who cry for large govt. But it's usually those who are lazy and covet what others have worked hard for. Or have fantasies of communism or fascism.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Nixon was the religious-right conservative (not a "progressive"). George W, was the religious-right conservative (not a "progressive"). Ronald Reagan was the icon of "Conservatism" (all increased the size of government) Bill Clinton was called the "progressive" (he reduced the size of government). I don't think you are getting the point of history here. The rhetoric is nothing more than election time pandering for Republicans. 2ndly, 45 Billion dollars to oil subsidies???

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - So you think it is fine to clamour about "food stamps" apparently preferring Americans to be starving to death like they do in Sudan? But it's ok to throw away Billions in Industry subsidies to the filthy rich that no one really needs for anything other than election bribes. And how exactly is that not "taking away from tax payers" To give to the "lazy"? Tony Hayword complained about his Yaght club routine being intereferred with during the BP. Bush spent 3 mths a year on vacation

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - The "Lazy" as you put it (don't get to tax deduct their business lunches at $200 a meal resteraunts), or deduct their city-club memberships (that's where you go eat and drink and play golf all day), nor do they "expense" their trips to resorts in the Bahamas (so that tax payers can subsidize them). But somehow you think all these fat lazy rich people, making Tax payers foot the bill for their lifestyles of leasure is "not the same". Yes, it isn't the same, it is much worse.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - The bottom line is there are countries which currently practice exactly the Wealth-Disparity system Republicans want in America. And there are countries which practice what Democrats are "said" to want. Why don't you look them up and see which have the highest standard of living, the most freedoms, and the highest GDP. Honduras and Bolivia. Very religious, 90% Catholic, total wealth disparity, fascist coups against "liberals. Limbaugh even said he wanted Honduras to "invade"

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma "To relieve the misfortunes of our fellow creatures is concurring with the Deity; it is godlike; but, if we provide encouragement for laziness, and supports for folly, may we not be found fighting against God and Nature, which perhaps has appointed want and misery as the proper punishment for, and cautions against, as well as necessary consequences of, idleness and extravagance? cont

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Great speech, but you are pointing it in the wrong direction. people working for minimum wage do the hardest work on earth, and people with 6 digit salaries live lifestyles of opulence and luxury largely from government money. All money is made by the government. It's printed, and then circulated. Hayword doesn't work nearly as hard as his maid.

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma PS. the Oil Companies get 45 Billion dollars in welfare assistance. No Republicans complain despite the fact, companies as bad as BP don't even need it. One tax-payer subsidized lunch for a CEO costs US Taxpayers more than food stamps for an entire family for an entire week, yet you hear no Republican complain (not even their preachers). How much do they work? Families on food stamps earn substandard incomes (they are not "unemployed" because they are lazy) most work hard labor

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma "Government is instituted to protect property of every sort.... This being the end of government, that alone is not a just government,... nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest." A quote from James Madison. There should be no taking of money from the rich to give to the poor, or money taken from the poor to give to the rich.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - That is a complete historical fabrication. see the posts below. (furthermore, speaking of property, it was the Republican courts who began the use of Eminant Domain as an excuse to seize the houses of the poor and give to their rich property developers for nothing more than some more strip malls in the neighborhood)

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Eminant Domain is wrong. Anytime an American is forced off their land it is a wrong of the highest order. That is why I say we must vote those into office who will create laws which are equal. By this I mean, laws which don't favor any class, race or creed. Also if those quotes are a "historical fabrication", then why weren't we socialist from the beginning? Why was the welfare state started in the last century? When, if you were right, it would have been included in the constitution

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - You have been indoctrinated about the Constitution as well. The Constitution was a process document. It defined the processes of government to be used, it did not spell out everything that was to be done. There are many things which have to be decided based on the Constitutional process. There is nothing in the consitution about sewage systems, water works, the interstate, the uniform commercial code, Christmas, and a host of other daily life issues in modern civilization.

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - It was "Constitutional" to have a "dual" in the middle of the street and shoot someone you disagreed with. It was "Constitutional" to traffic in human slavery. It was "Constitutional"to hold a lynching. Then it wasn't. The PROCESS of government RULED differently in one age than it did in another. The "Constitution" did not address any of these things, it addressed the PROCESS by which these things are decided. (cont)

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma "Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the state governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government. The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress." Alexander Hamilton.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma whenever we attempt to amend the scheme of Providence, and to interfere with the government of the world, we had need to be very circumspect, lest we do more harm than good." A quote from Benjamin Franklin.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Compare Honduras and Bolivia to Norway (as socialist state). Now if after seeing the stark night and day differences in these two different types of countries, you still clamour for Honduran style government, I think you have a cognitive disorder or you are a very dishonest person. Children do not live in sewers in Norway, their GDP is 4th highest int he world. They have complete energy independence, and one of the highest EPA standards on earth. (Cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Ask Norwegians if they feel "oppressed" by their "big-government", and then ask Hondurans the same about their "small government", and see the difference in answers. You are being told lies. And the people telling them to you, know they are lying.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - (cont) and it is no accident they worked so hard to make "Torture" morally acceptable to Americans. They were tried and found guilty of being "war criminals" for this same "torture" in WW2, and it's use from the Inquisitions (which Hitler copied from Ignatius Loyola) is the primary reason to attempt it's resurrection as morally acceptable. So..You think right-wing death squads are a good thing? You think torturing "leftists" and "liberals" to enforce a Roman fascist state is g?

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma The ideas which I'm putting forth are not congruent with that of Hitler or nazism. The nazis had their definition of socialism, and the communist had their definition of socialism. What is yours?

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Do you really think these kinds of double standards and "crooked wieghts" are good? (When it comes to oppressing the poor?) And discussing "government handouts"? You invoke the word "God" and follow it with speeches about the founding fathers, apparently neither of which you have actually read? (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Jefferson- "the enormous inequality" between rich and poor. ..one way of "silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise."

Madison - Laws should be used to "reduce extreme wealth towards a state of mediocrity and raise extreme indigence towards a state of comfort."

(cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Pro 14:31 He that oppresseth the poor reproach his Maker: but he that honoureth him hath mercy on the poor

Pro 19:17  He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the LORD; and that which he hath given will he pay him again.

Pro 21:13 Whoso stoppeth his ears at the cry of the poor, he also shall cry himself, but shall not be heard.

Pro 28:15 As a roaring lion, and a ranging bear; so is a wicked ruler over the poor people

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - You are being indoctrinated with lies. Lies about the Bible, about the founding fathers, lies about the Constitution, and lies about reality. And the people who tell you these lies, when caught, cite the fact, they have great "ratings" as justification for their lying. They actually brag their lying "works". And it is primarily because of people like you who continue to listen to them after they get caught lying, and even admit they do it. Do you think that is a good thing?

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Those are very good bible quotes! Although I would call to your attention the fact that govt is mentioned nowhere in those quotes. It is a personal mandate to each one of us that we should help those in need. Since God doesn't force us to be generous, then why should govt force us to be. There is no such thing as collective salvation, only individual salvation. Collective salvation is a Karl Marx perversion of the gospel.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Actually technically, those all came from the Old Testament which was the legal code for the nation (state of Israel). It was all about "government", and in fact enforced by law totalling taxes of 30%-40% of personal income . In the New Testament, under the "higher law of Christ" the requirement was raised to half, (50%), though "Christian Jews" did not control the state government, thus could not make their laws legally mandatory, but they were morally mandatory. (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - It is strange that you errorneously make such a distinction when it comes to poilitical issues you do not like, but feel no such restraint in calling for state enforced bans on abortion, yet abortion is literally not even mentioned, and the Biblical definition of the soul itself came from NEPHESH, meaning the first breath of life at birth. The LAW (eye for eye, life for life) required a misdemeaner fine, when a woman was actually assaulted by a man, and her pregnancy terminated

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - Yet despite actually even be contradicted by the Bible, "conservatives" have not problem imposing that on everyone else in the country through government and law, despite the fact historically it is even an admitted Church heresy called Traducianism. and the same goes for religious holy days, such as "Christ-mass" and purely Roman Catholic holy day, and actually one that really does even violate the Constitution, and the Bible as well (the Puritans coming here to escape it noted)

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Your shots at me are quite baseless since I'm not a Catholic but a Christian. Also your pastor comment was very crude, especially to me, because my father is a pastor, and he only preaches and teaches what he has found to be true. I pray every day that God will guide me to the truth. If you would also pray that God will guide you, then maybe we can find the truth together.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Th eprimary problem with lies, is that you can never make them straight. If "America" is a "Christian country" then we are obligated to live by "Christian doctrines" as laws. And in reality, that would mean NO CHRISTMAS, no anti-abortion laws, and a 50% tax bracket dedicated exclusively (not to government, the military, and the poor) but just the poor. If "America" is not a "Christian country", then you cannot claim Christmas, Anti-abortion and prayer in schools. (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - You cannot "have your cake and it it too". But either way you go, you end up caught in the lie by the flip side of the equation. Factually and historically America was not founded to be a European parochial state as all professional historians can quickly and easily prove to you. It is amazing that these henious lies, fully intended to undermine real American democracy are perpetrated using God. It is disgusting to such a point, many have become rabid atheists as a result

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - The people behind these religious have been lying using religion since the 1930s, when they openly identified themselves as Nazis. Now, they drop the Nazi part, & compensate with lip service "The Jews, God's Chosen people", but their political agenda has never changed and their lip service is just that (lip service). They would just as quickly mass murder today as they did 60 years ago. They want a restoration of the Vatican's Roman Reich, this demands annulment of the 1st amd

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - You are using all these arguments to support them in their attempt to Balkanize the US, destroy the 1st amendment, and establish Mussolini's fascism in the US as part of their new Reich. Now tell me exactly how that is either "patriotic" "American" or "Constitutional". That is the bottom-line of all you hear them say, every lie, every historical revisionism, every warped Bible verse. It's a con job. A really really nasty con job financed by Texas Oil money, & whored out preachers

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - The same kind of preachers that were sponsoring Right-wing death squads in Latin-America, using torture, deciet, and murder against anyone they disagreed with to stay in power, and using religion as a cloak for the most despicable things imaginable on earth. You are being conned. Rush Limbaugh (fully aware of these death squads in Honduras) said he wanted them here. Those are the kind of people you are listening to rightwayvideo. Does that not get your attention?

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma "I want everyone to keep what he has earned, subject to the principle that the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State ... The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners." Hitler.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma If human life only begins after birth, then why did Mary, when pregnant with Jesus, say "I'm with child." Also if abortion was mandatory for pregnancy outside of marriage, why wasn't Mary forced to abort Jesus. Human life is human life no matter what stage of the life cycle. God is consistent in everything, including life. Why sir, are you not?

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma First, I question the context of those quotes. Second, the founders were a diverse group of men who had many different ideas. Lastly, both Jefferson and Madison were presidents, why didn't they pass laws which would reflect the ideas in those quotes.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - The bigger question is why were you never told they said them?

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - "Bailouts" and "deficits" (never an issue for Republicans while in office) only serve election time rhetoric, which they fully intend from the beginning to dishonor. "Bailouts" and "defiicits" are determined by the need to spend, balancing the "budget" (something no Republican president has done since the advent of the Nixon era) was last accomplished by a Democrat (not a Republican) and despite being handed an economy on verge of total collpase, Obama has recuped (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - This was done "while" Republicans were making trips to China asking China to collapse our loans and destroy the economy, and while Rush (the radio nazi Limbaugh) was calling daily for America's failure (so that the Republicans who created this mess to begin with, would be voted back into power). God is as important to Democrats as it is to Republicans, the difference of course being, that Democrats actually honor the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution on the subject, (cont)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - And don't support medieval style inquisition torture, and right-wing death squads in Latin America against non-heterodoxy theological opinions. How exaclty anyone can justify that and invoke the word "God" is beyond logic.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Sir if you were a true intellectual you would have moved beyond this republican vs democrat argument. Its only a fool who would support any party blindly. What matters is that we put people into office who have character. As an Obama supporter I would ask you, does he have character. Does SEIU have principles? Did ACORN have morals? Does God smile or frown when he looks upon planned parenthood? The founders knew that you have to look to God for principles, equal justice and freedom.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - Your misinformation about Obama is so deep and distorted you do not realistically see the person you have been trained to hate. Yes, Obama has character, if he did not he would have thrown every gun-toting 'tea-party" idiot in prison as a terrorist the same way Bush would have/did. (But he actually does respect the Constitution) If he had no character, he would have yanked Fox News FCC license the same way Nixon and Reagen did to liberal media for 20 years(But he doesn't) etc.

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - If Obama were the "dictator" you claim he is, most liberals would be much happier with him. They would be happy, your voting machines were fixed to spit out his name as the winner, no matter what you vote, or that the people in charge his court will appoint him president, and ask you not to count the results. If Obama really were the Hitler/Dictator they tell you he is, he would throw his political opponents in prison for no other reason like Bush did to Don Seigelman (he doesnt)

[ObamaComma]

@ObamaComma - But because you are listening to the actual enemy of America tell you who to hate, you ignore all that they really did, and project these behaviors onto someone who is completely innocent of them, to justify the distorted logic of voting for openly states it wants to destroy your country (unless and until they are put back in Charge of looting it, and destroying it all over again?) [Explain that?]

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma Did Bush increase the size and role of govt? Yes. Is Obama actively increasing the size and role of govt? Yes. Why is that? Because both of them are progressive. The right and left wings of progressivism. Each one has taken progressively more power away from the American people. Logic dictates that the smaller something is, the less power it can wield.

[rightwayvideo]

@ObamaComma I think that if you were open minded enough to watch Glenn Beck for one week, you would be surprised to find his show devoid of both fascism and communism. It's okay to come out of the basement, the sunshine won't hurt you.

[ObamaComma]

@rightwayvideo - I "quit" watching Glenn Beck as soon as I realized he was pushing Nazi historical perspective which I document on this channel on his historical warping of FDR and the NRA program and the 1930s Nazi rallies to overthrow the government, which I was already personally familiar with. I predicted this would be the direction of Glenn Beck long before he began his 9-12 project/Tea-party merger months before he did it. I know the play book, and called his next move.

[Sorrento1969]

Glenn Beck voice is exactly the same as Richard Dreyfuss!!!! Not trying to offend Mr Dreyfuss

[MWAX69]

now you have the videos. now dont tell me they didt say what they just ssaid. its getting a little ridiculous! its hard trying to argue with the facts now isnt it!!!!!

[MWAX69]

you either did not watch the video or refuse to beleive it . there is no way that you can possibly call me blind after the videos of ron bloom and anita dunn. you gave me nothing but your opinion. i will send you the video. obviosly you refused to watch it. i even quoted them.

[MWAX69]

still wating for your evidence on anything else. but i will just shoot that down with the truth again

[MWAX69]

how am i in denial. if anyone is in denial it is you! watch the video. and you are gonna tell me not to face the truth. it is on video for petes sake.!! you are so lost if you are telling me they didnt say that when i have video tape to prove it!!!

[MWAX69]

anita dunn said that mao is one of the people she turns to most. watch the video it is all over youtube! she praises the will he had to take over china. and ron blooms exact word were that "we all agree with mao that we get power largely from the barrel of a gun" watch the video it is all over youtube. so you are wrong and the video is right in front of you to watch if you choose to watch it. beck has factual evidence to prove what he said. and you can not dispute video!!

[MWAX69]

yeah i agree with that statement , but then anyone could put spyware in anybodys computer anywhere in the world!

[MWAX69]

i will say it again . please tell me specifically what glenn said that he claimed to be a fact that is not a fact and please provide evidence!

[suedi52]

Olbermann is the dangerous one - listen to him for a few minutes - he spits disgustingly rude comments constantly. The difference between Olbermann (hate spewer) and Beck (fact giver and constitutional devotee) is eons apart. Olbermann - the propaganda czar!!!

[ivan134]

@suedi52

lmao. olberman hate spewer? beck fact giver? wow. plz show me evidence of both and not want u want 2 be true.

[MWAX69]

type in "anita dunn mao" and type in "ron bloom mao" and you will get your video evidence . my god he had it on his show for weeks and the videos were all over the internet. unless ofcourse all you read are left wing sites then you will never see them

[ivan134]

lmao i just watched both of those videos and wow the had me laughin like crazy. those are ur videos or glen beck givin facts? ahaaahahaa. omg plz come on u can do better

[MWAX69]

and where am i wrong??? funny how you make fun of and criticize but do not provide information on where i am wrong. mao was responsible for at least 50 million dead chinese. that is the history of mao. so lets say that a conservative was in the white house and said that one of the peop[le he turned to most was adolph hitler, who was responsible for less deaths than mao, would there be a backlash? you can take that video however you want but guess what! she does not work in the whitehouse anymore

[seamoremonster]

@nt0xik8ed Direct your rhetoric at the lowest common denominator and repeat the lies enough and they will believe it...straight from Hitler and his Minister of Propaganda George Goebbels. It's ironic that Beck accuses Obama of being Hitler when it is Beck himself who employs Hitlerian tactics and strategies.

[MWAX69]

if anyone can tell me if glenn has said anythging that is not a fact just post it. that goes for you as well keith. call him names but one thing you can not call him is a liar. and if you do, well then tell me specifically what he lied about

[ObamaComma]

His list of lies is exhaustive. I have posted 90 minutes of videos exposing his lies on this channel "Glen Beck" under playlists. His claims that his 9-12 rally were upwards of a million and a half were outrageous blatant lies. His claims about Obama and "Czars" were lies. His claims about the Obama administration being radical "Maoists" are all lies. His historical analysis of the FDR era is a complete historical lie.(Actually the Nazi perspective of the era), and even his crying is a lie.

[MWAX69]

he has video tape and audio of these people saying they agree with mao and turn to him most as a philosopher , so you are proven wrong on that one with video tape evidence! ABC and pew research claimed there were over a million people there at the rally so if they are not correct then tell me how many were there since you are an expert in "people counting"! name specifically what is not factual that he said about the fdr era! and how is his crying a lie? please provide evidence!

[ObamaComma]

@MWAX69 - If you are so worried about Mao, perhaps you should ask Rupert Murdoch to stop running the propaganda media arm of the Chinese communist government, or ask him to divorce his communist Chinese wife, or perhaps relocate his residence outside communist China, or perhaps even stop using Communist Cuba as a Tax Haven to rip off American tax payers who are footing the bill for his FCC licenses? Oh, but that's right, "he's "conservative" so it doesn't matter what he does, no matter how vile

[ObamaComma]

@MWAX69 - There are over 300 minutes of video (5 and 1/2 hours of it) documenting Glenn Becks habitual and continual intentional deceit., just on the channel along (under the playlist GLENN BECK), aside from the volumes of hours of the same throughout the rest of the internet (with at least one instance where he even admitted he did it) The fact that you posted the comment above, despite all this, indicates you have a cognitive distortion as a result of indoctrination.

[Retact]

Don't call him "Fear Monger in Chief." He existed to create fear, calling him "Fear Monger in Chief," just honors him. Call him what he really is, a Domestic Terrorist.

[curvalecce]

Yep, I agree Beck is encouraging horrible racist attacks, and spreading disgusting imagery. Watching his show (as one must to understand the phenomenon), I was appalled at the inaccuracy of his taunts and plain nastiness his presentation revealed...

BUT, isn't crushing the constitutional protections of American citizens (which is what suppressing Beck comes down to) just playing into the hands of the extreme right? Does freedom need to be chained for its own protection?

[TAz69x]

We REALLY need to start an actual boycott movement against Beck/Fox, if not just Beck. An actual perpetual movement that is not as ineffective as the last one which targeted his advertisers.

I'd be interested in what the best targets would be. Obviously finances and advertisers are a good target, but you'd need media coverage to go along with it. Voiceless boycotts are pointless.

[seamoremonster]

@TAz69x I've been saying that for awhile too. I think it is seriously time to fight these bastards by identifying their sponsorship and boycotting product.