My friend and I used to play when we were kids and had nothing to do. We were so bad, because we would take any chance we could get. Good thing neither of us were good, heh.
I agree with this rule. And people must understand this is just a rule, which can be broken in concrete situations to get an advantage. And even when you are a piece up, you should not take unless it helps you. Have you ever tried to play against a strong chess program being a piece up? Believe me; Taking may lead to a draw or even to defeat. Listen to what this Gm says! He knows the game!
@SuperPeristilo Thank you for your comment. I have tried the piece up and sacrifice play.. often leading to a draw or worse result. This video has been highly effective in teaching me this critical lesson!
I do not agree with your sentence "to take is a mistake." For example, in the first game White should not trade pieces because he has a lead in development (Black's Q-side minor pieces have not been developed), or in various other places in the game because one's pieces are more actively placed than the opponent. But what if, for example, you are facing a vicious attack? Wouldn't it make sense to exchange the most important attacking pieces (if you can) so as to survive the attack??
@Gaussdxdydz Vaild points, but the caveat at the end of the lesson is critical: if in a particular position you see that you can take and get an advantage, do so. Most players know the saying "If you see a good move, look for a better one" but I took from this video the lesson that too many players (I'm one) will take because even if they look for other moves, they don't understand when keeping the tension is better.
Fantastic! It is just like in martial arts: you wait until the opponent goes for the offensive and then you get an advantage after by simply reacting to the circumstance that comes. An advantage is not always present from this, but it is a main principle.
What a great video! Great explanation, great logic, thank you so much for explaining it in such detail that even an inexperienced chess player can understand it! Well done, Mr. Smirnov!
Thank you very much for your lesson. I have never heard that "to take is a mistake", but i've just recently begun playing again (havent since i was a child), and i see the computer player doing this often. I'm usually inclined to trade quickly and keep things even or to my advantage, but that rarely leads to my advantage. I found (prior to this) that very simply, even if you do trade, when you intiate it, you usually end up with a less favorable position.
i've always thought about this, i knew that just taking pieces does not help my army since is getting smaller, so i only take when there is an advantage for taking my opponent's pieces, for example, when i trade a passive piece for an active or when i create a weakness on his structure. but this video confirmed what i thought. i'll try to avoid to take as much as possible if there is not a good reason to take :) thanks! please post more videos.
Has God given 9 strong warnings to the USA in her treatment of Israel?
You are invited to my channel to see a feature video that tells of 9 occasions.
Y would God do this? So that we turn around from a wrong path.
God created Israel for His Holy purposes & said He would raise up Israel in the end. If don't know this, we are in darkness, and we should not be in darkness, because God has done too much to give us light.
Thanks, this was great. I have a feeling it will improve my game. I always noticed that when I take first, my opponent gains development, but for some reason I never stopped to think about it.
I like you. Do you like me? Great success!
texantillidie24 1 day ago
My friend and I used to play when we were kids and had nothing to do. We were so bad, because we would take any chance we could get. Good thing neither of us were good, heh.
DeadFishFactory 1 week ago
Imagine if you could play chess in skyrim
DTorax 1 week ago
chess is way better then skyrim
MegaLink117 2 weeks ago 8
king in check at947
emangamerdude6 3 weeks ago
3:58, can the queen just go to H4 and not be trapped, or am i missing something
timmaaa07 3 weeks ago
@timmaaa07 nevermind, didn't hear what you said about that move lmao
timmaaa07 3 weeks ago
Russian + Country = win
This is win.
WDParsell 4 weeks ago
@WDParsell epik!
kryelun 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Smirnov now that I have seen this Video I like you along with Kasparov!
I already knew that ' to take is a mistake ' ( mostly ) before I had any source of information about this....
everythinglikethat 4 weeks ago
I support your style!
everythinglikethat 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
everythinglikethat 4 weeks ago
What happens if the opponent is continuously checking you and you have no pieces to defend the king due to confrontation ?
ItzKrazedHD 4 weeks ago
@ItzKrazedHD then u die, ;D
iLeadthePack 4 weeks ago
Why can't bishop take queen on f6?
nkondr3n 1 month ago
@nkondr3n Nxf3 is check.
SteelPokemonFan 1 month ago
@SteelPokemonFan underrcheck
marstuber96 1 month ago
so can we conclude the gambit openings accepted variations are not the best shot for black ?
noxicologue 1 month ago
He sounds like Borat...
ReinhardERNST 1 month ago
I always take... lol. no more
tonybeir 1 month ago
I love the way he says however :P
QuestionMorals 1 month ago
I agree with this rule. And people must understand this is just a rule, which can be broken in concrete situations to get an advantage. And even when you are a piece up, you should not take unless it helps you. Have you ever tried to play against a strong chess program being a piece up? Believe me; Taking may lead to a draw or even to defeat. Listen to what this Gm says! He knows the game!
SuperPeristilo 1 month ago
@SuperPeristilo Thank you for your comment. I have tried the piece up and sacrifice play.. often leading to a draw or worse result. This video has been highly effective in teaching me this critical lesson!
Tompsf1 1 month ago
your accent is awesome. it actually helped me learn better because i payed more attention!
eldavido761 1 month ago
at 10:41 why does Black play ...Qxf3 instead of ...Bd4 ?
Gaussdxdydz 1 month ago
@Gaussdxdydz you would be in the same situation as in 10:00, don´t you?
irenelealortiz 1 month ago
I do not agree with your sentence "to take is a mistake." For example, in the first game White should not trade pieces because he has a lead in development (Black's Q-side minor pieces have not been developed), or in various other places in the game because one's pieces are more actively placed than the opponent. But what if, for example, you are facing a vicious attack? Wouldn't it make sense to exchange the most important attacking pieces (if you can) so as to survive the attack??
Gaussdxdydz 1 month ago
@Gaussdxdydz Vaild points, but the caveat at the end of the lesson is critical: if in a particular position you see that you can take and get an advantage, do so. Most players know the saying "If you see a good move, look for a better one" but I took from this video the lesson that too many players (I'm one) will take because even if they look for other moves, they don't understand when keeping the tension is better.
karlg1965 1 month ago
it is good to trade pieces if you are up in material
MrMathrox 1 month ago
As a 15-1600 CC player, I found this really insightful in regards to tempo.
960random 1 month ago 10
@eagleduzt to take is a mistake.
ProMaxElite 1 month ago
great lesson, BUT LMAO U SOUND LIKE BORAT!
TheMetramix 1 month ago
@TheMetramix idiot
skyflynite 1 month ago
8:30 why doesnt he just take the knight with his knight?
eagleduzt 1 month ago
@eagleduzt if white takes knight w/ knight then white would lose his a1 rook.
960random 1 month ago
Rubbish!!!
balabala2001 2 months ago
@MrCube600 , h2 is protected by white's black bishop on f4. It's not checkmate, he would just lose his queen. So... no, it's not a better move :)
maskreklam 2 months ago
I didn't know Borat was a grandmaster
ProfessorCoolCat 2 months ago in playlist More videos from ImproveYourChess
I dont see the point of blacks move at 3.02 ; isnt Qxh2 # checkmate a better move?
MrCube600 2 months ago
Fantastic! It is just like in martial arts: you wait until the opponent goes for the offensive and then you get an advantage after by simply reacting to the circumstance that comes. An advantage is not always present from this, but it is a main principle.
DjKlacs 2 months ago
This Video rocks.
Alucard8868 2 months ago
It's so simple it's ridiculous
mikezilla3 2 months ago
very good video! usually I dont watch a 12 minute video, but this is an exception!
TheMfkd 2 months ago
i've learnt more in 12 mins than i have in 10 years of playing
slapmyfunkybass 2 months ago 45
great instructive video. Thanks GM Smirnov!
Obex99 2 months ago
What a great video! Great explanation, great logic, thank you so much for explaining it in such detail that even an inexperienced chess player can understand it! Well done, Mr. Smirnov!
DDRaHolic 2 months ago
Thank you very much for your lesson. I have never heard that "to take is a mistake", but i've just recently begun playing again (havent since i was a child), and i see the computer player doing this often. I'm usually inclined to trade quickly and keep things even or to my advantage, but that rarely leads to my advantage. I found (prior to this) that very simply, even if you do trade, when you intiate it, you usually end up with a less favorable position.
jeremygiaco 2 months ago
is he from texas?
TheRightNeutrino 2 months ago
@TheRightNeutrino I believe Russia...and I'll admit I never heard that dialect before except in Dexters Laboratory.
kikook222 2 months ago
@TheRightNeutrino no hes just from the south, they all sound that way lol jk
flybirdefly 2 months ago
here have some attractive happen
shilu910 2 months ago
This will surely help me in my tournament tomorrow, thanks! :D
almacocoa98 2 months ago
this will help thanks!
ubernetworkgeek2 2 months ago
in english please
fishinfreddy1 3 months ago
@fishinfreddy1 Dude what the fuck's your problem? You know damn well he was speaking English.
kikook222 2 months ago
He is tha best playa in all of Kazakhstan.
Thank you velly much. I like a you!
petestrat07 3 months ago
loved the lesson, GM Igor Smirnov!
Diviniteee 3 months ago
Wait! i was watching machinima!
FirenX951 3 months ago
Excellent video Igor.
Xinta57 3 months ago
i've always thought about this, i knew that just taking pieces does not help my army since is getting smaller, so i only take when there is an advantage for taking my opponent's pieces, for example, when i trade a passive piece for an active or when i create a weakness on his structure. but this video confirmed what i thought. i'll try to avoid to take as much as possible if there is not a good reason to take :) thanks! please post more videos.
nachobis 3 months ago
Great video GM Smirnov, thank you!
MrGunwitch 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like good moves?
Has God given 9 strong warnings to the USA in her treatment of Israel?
You are invited to my channel to see a feature video that tells of 9 occasions.
Y would God do this? So that we turn around from a wrong path.
God created Israel for His Holy purposes & said He would raise up Israel in the end. If don't know this, we are in darkness, and we should not be in darkness, because God has done too much to give us light.
Jesus Christ came thru Israel.
Please warn others.
GodisTruthseekTruth 4 months ago
Thank you for the video !!
MrCasanova1231 5 months ago
Nice vid, helped me a lot!
dreksmrdi 5 months ago
What a superb lesson - helped my chess dramatically immediately. Thanks.
InitiumNovum 6 months ago
Great lesson!! Thank you!
mclu2fan 6 months ago
Thanks, this was great. I have a feeling it will improve my game. I always noticed that when I take first, my opponent gains development, but for some reason I never stopped to think about it.
Unicyclist96 6 months ago
Nice video thank you
Hoihoijooah 7 months ago