Ron Paul on Obama win over McCain

[jkocik3000]

ron paul delivered chuck norris

[imrnlil]

that stupid music

[sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhh]

settle down.

[zenrev13]

Ron Paul doesn't trust anybody. He dreams of honest politics with unbiased reporting, Deep down though I think Paul has more confidence in Obama than he did with Bush.

[WodeBolder]

I think we are in big trouble... world government? world regulations? I have come to think of Obama as a bigger trojan horse than THE "Trojan Horse" .. a wolf in sheeps clothing? or a white banker in a black mans skin.

[raptrackfanman]

Paul seemed like a very smart guy. I agreed with alot of his shit. But wtf is this? Sayin Obama isnt "a man of the ppl" anymore cuz he spent so much money? It was fundraised money... by the PPL. And wtf r they talkin bout Obama wants to take money from the middle class and give it to the corporate elite??... uhhh from wut i understand his policies r the vice versa of that.

[ChaoticSouls]

Obama still earned that money through fundraising. I think ron paul even respects obama to some degree.

[jmjfanss]

But paul doesn't trust him.

[packrat76]

Fundraising from Wallstreet and other big shots.

[tripit88]

Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin 2012

[FistInTheAir420]

Here is the thing about free speech.

You have the right to tell the truth. But the media chooses what they give coverage to. So if you tell the truth, but it is an unpopular truth. (Like Ron Paul) You'll still be allowed to say what you are saying. But the media will make it a point to not give you a platform.

Obama won because he was the 'change' candidate. Paul preached real change.

Too real for the media's taste.

Too real to win an election.

So most people had only heard of mccain & obama

[Gettinghitonattheban]

But you see, Obama presents an opening that McCain doesn't have. Where as long as the people stay mad as hell, I doubt Obama would dare to screw up.

[junkeemonkee]

People really need to wake up and start listening to Ron Paul because he was saying that Obama would win this and everything he is saying here he has been saying for a long while. Ron Paul is a very smart and genuine man... people have just lost their way and need to WAKE UP! It may be to late now!!

[qwertisdirty]

oh you are all so nutty extremists

[ozne64]

now everybody on the right is trying to diminish what obama has accomplished!first he beat hillary the most powerful candidate in the dem primary(power,money,big shot in the party,all with her)and then he beat mccain,the repubblicans,the evangelicals,and racism all at 1 time! the money he collected was almost all money from the PEOPLE!how come ron paul was not able to do the same in the rep primaries?ron paul LOST and obama WON so i don't think ron paul is in the position to say anything!

[kikkoman1231]

just because you win, doesn't make you the best choice

obama wants to stay in afghanistan, continue our intervention around the world. peace talks in palestine and north korea are continuously on halt because we have to approve peace deals..

obama will continue free trade agreements, aka free trade restraints. obama has not adressed fiscal or monetary policy at all! our dollar will continue to fail. as we speak he's putting together a STIMULUS PACKAGE!

CHANGE MY ASS!

[eldarklordo]

Obama doesn't cross any of the left's boundaries. Paul crosses a few of the republicans boundaries. For example; He is against the war, doesn't believe in prosecuting people for marijuana, and was strongly against the bailout. Obama won because he is a puppet. Everybody is in the position to say anything they want. This is still America, right?

[Gettinghitonattheban]

Well, Obama won for the same reason Clinton won. After a "conservative" president screws things up they want to jump to the next party thinking it produces some kind of change, despite the fact that Clinton was in fact a Reaganite. People don't connect the dots to see that George Bush (both of them in fact) only used conservative values to get them elected, but never really ran there office using them. But if people want their bullshit version of "freedom" let them have it, and the cake, too.

[eldarklordo]

Valid point, and very well said. However; This "bullshit version of freedom" you speak of scares the shit out of me. we all have to deal with it (not just the morons). I am very nervous.

[riva0047]

You're statements lack any true logic. Just because somebody wins an election does not make them right and just because somebody loses an election does not mean they are wrong, or are not in position to say anything. By your standards, since Hitler won an election in Germany that means everything he said was valid and true and all of his detractors should have just accepted it since they were not "in the position to say anything".

[jennycave49]

whacko!

[Triumphit1]

pEOPLE NEED SPACE From the government. There is nothing more important than space. Without space there is no shape. And no 1 has ron Paul has a small penis

[DespondentDream]

I have a great respect for Ron Paul.

However I can't help but feel confused or just plain ignorant whenever people mention a new world order. In many ways such a world wide government could take care of a lot of issues, the only real problem would be what would be accepted, how easy it would be to change thing, ect.

I think our planet having a unified government is a fantastic, powerful idea. However it's development and creation make me very nervous. Maybe that's just me :P

[hugolp]

Some sort of world goverment might not seem such a bad idea when you think your goverment looks after you. But imagine what would happen if a bad leader gets to power or a fascist revolt takes control. Where would you go? Where would you scape to?

And thats what its happening, the big bankers control the world through the central banks. They control the issuence of money, and that way they control the countries.

[weezer543]

Sad thing is that it's been the Conservatives who allowed the bankers free reign, and sold out our economy to China. I'd rather have GOOD government regulation that an unfettered free market that allows corporate elites and their lobbyists to defraud the American public. Hopefully Obama will do this.

[HarrisonCountyStudio]

Dems and Republicans both are to blame for our economy. The market's as we know them are not free. They are subject to the forces of government... the government created demand and there for the supply through these banks. Banks were encouraged to make sub prime loans. With out the regulations that forced many of these mortgages and Freddie and Fannie not there to buy up this junk... the free market would have never gone down this road.

[weezer543]

Banks were never mandated to make subprime loans. They made them because they figured they could jack up interest rates on middle-income people and the poor and make a killing. They were allowed to sell and re-sell this debt and rate it as "A" when in fact it wasn't (that's what lack of govt oversight does). But this is the Conservative approach: They don't believe in government (a.k.a. democracy), hence they defile government by gutting it and letting the private sector "police themselves".

[HarrisonCountyStudio]

Yes they were mandated. Ever heard of "red linning"? Carter and Clinton touted their administrations accomplishments in having more minority in home ownership. This is a fourm of regulation. Banks were to make an investment where they would normaly not (to low income) and then we allowed them to package these mortgages and sell them to Fannie and Freddie, two government (tax payer backed) corporations. The Government Mandated that banks must comprise a portion of their portfolio to this sector.

[HarrisonCountyStudio]

Weezer543 Banks were mandated to make subprime loans. Why would our (first black president as his supportors say) Bill Clinton take credit for enabling millions of New home buyers to purchase homes under his administration??? Remeber the phrase red lining? Not on his watch. Everyone deserves the American dream of owning a home... who cares if they can afford it.

[hugolp]

@weezer543 is goverment the one that unfetters the markets with regulation that under a beautiful excuse just have monopolisitc consecuences.

[weezer543]

not true. Regulation defines parameters for corporate behavior, and does so to protect the public. A basic example is why insider trading is not allowed. It's the same reason why drug companies can't just throw drugs out to the market without adequate research. Of course there are still drug companies that circumvent the process through fraud, but they eventually get caught (albeit too late) when people start dropping dead from their products.

[birch919]

You mean that the gvnt takes the right of each American to CHOOSE whether or not to use drugs that are tested or not tested? And instead use the FDA which has denied thousands of americans safe drugs that could have eased their suffering or cured them before they died? Plus, docs exist for a reason, go to them for PROFESSIONAL opinions on any drugs before making a choice: or u could just let the FDA continue to give small business drug companies no chance and stifle any hope of true competition

[weezer543]

When defective drugs are rushed to the market under the guise of "consumer choice", people die. Examples, Baycol, Vioxx,; had the drug companies conducted proper follow-up studies we'd have a better idea who should NOT be prescribed this drug. The FDA these collective determinations of risk ONLY to protect public. We COULD go back to pre-1936 when unregulated drug companies sold radioactive beverages, cosmetics which caused blindness, and worthless "cures" for diabetes and tuberculosis.

[weezer543]

Regulation of corporations who can potentially harm the public's health is a legitimate function of a democratic society (i.e. drug companies, car companies who make unsafe cars, people who sell foods with contaminated Chinese milk, etc). Now on issues like gun ownership, recreational drug use, religious beliefs, the gov't has no business telling you what to do because your conduct isn't hurting anyone else (unless you go out of your way to do so i.e. shoot kids at VA Tech, or sell them weed).

[Kyocus]

One world government means untouchable government. In a single nation the people can rise up. In a world government even if a fiew coutries riot there is only one military, and it isnt on any one coutries side. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[tomrdee]

Even before he was senator Obama, he was the keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic convention. The media talked about him running for President then.

[justatrey]

We are so f***ed

[xenodictator]

Yeah.

[xaviervonrottie]

Sweet! I could not be more happy!