Added: 1 year ago
From: Winchesterjournalism
Views: 13,086
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Response to @United Pebbles not only British but interestingly Jewish too.

  • I got to remind everyone this guy is Spaniard. So he could be a propagandist subject of the Spanish royal and of her empire at the period.

    He wanted people to believe less in gold, so Spain can buy more to offset their over spending and conquests. He is a belief in the sole value of human labor, same with the Vatican. He argue for tax as an excuse of a behemoth administration Spain have at the time.

    Same with Smith, who is afraid of his king and other lords, carefully veered away from Shay.

  • @UnitedPebbles

    Ricardo, along with Adam Smith, were English.

  • @NearAbbeyRoad More lies, everyone!! I got to remind everyone that these geezers are well fluent in foreign languages, have mastered Latin in their childhood education! So it is common to see they claimed other nations as their nationality. Yes, Abbey they learned their Latin in preschool age.....just looked and analyze their policies!!

  • @UnitedPebbles

    Again..............."Ricardo, along with Adam Smith, were English."

    

  • The free market works when not monopolized or rigged, which it is. Hence world-wide crashes because LAND & LABOUR are rigged and monopolized.

  • @UnitedPebbles

    "I got to remind everyone this guy is Spaniard. So he could be a propagandist subject of the Spanish royal"

    He was a british economist of jewish portuguese descent. Thank you for demonstrating again how irrationally paranoid americans can become.

  • Did it left out the market system of supply and demand?

  • lets assume all products have now become mechanised which you could argue most things have become how do we come up with a theory?

  • Was Newton 'wrong' because he did not know about black holes?

  • Pretty good at explaining Ricardo but it does fail to put it in prospective. Labour theory of value wrong and is known to be wrong. It took as much labour to build and 57 Ford Edsel, as a 57 Chevy but the value is different because of the subjective valuations of the public. You can teach how Ptolemy thought the earth was round and made break throughs with the earth being the center of the solar system, but don't you have to mention he was wrong. This video does not do that.

  • Much of Marxism is based on the Labour value fallacy, so you should point out it is wrong.

  • @ronwandell which value is different? use value? ie, is one car more reliable, better performing, etc? or is it exchange value, created by a restriction of supply? Or is it as a result of marketing? Each of these require labour. producing a good car takes more labour, getting hold of a rare car and maintaining it takes more labour, because of the rarity of parts, etc, and marketing requires the labour of marketers.

  • @oystersdontbleed The market value is different, this is what the car will fetch on the market. Building Edsels looses money because people value it less that the labor and materials put into it. That is the problem with labor value theory. It gets things backwards. A new car is valued at $25,000 not because it has so much labor in it. People put so much labor in it because it can be sold for $25,000. The price determines how much time effort and resources are put in.

  • @ronwandell

    The desirability of a Ford say over a Chevy car is down to the marketing. The Ford may sell for more because the public believe via marketing, the style of the body (marketing research), glamour, etc, the Ford is more desirable than a Chevy. This costs and is put into the cost of the car.

    A BMW has a large amount of marketing and advertising put into its cars to make them desirable. This is run into the cost of the car. A BMW is less reliable than a Hyundai but they want BMWs

  • Lead takes just as much labour to produce as gold.

  • @Teller3448 Not really. Gold is rare, and occurs in low concentrations. The labour required to prospect, extract ore, leach the gold, purify and cast it, and securely transport it, takes far more labour that lead, which is relatively easy to obtain and guard in comparison.

  • thanks to you (:

  • Thank you sooo much!!!

    

  • This is amazing. Many Thanks to you.

  • THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more