Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Check out The Nuclear Waste and Post Glacial Rebound, then you see a problem we should talk about....

    The ice is melting because of the Nuclear Tests 50-60 years ago, it made holes in the Ozon layer and they want US topay for it by lieing about the Co2..

    The Nuclearwaste is melting the ice...And all that mass displaces itself into the OCEANS which makes Earth Push Down the Landmass in the OCEAN.

    The Oceans is NOT rising, the Land under the Oceans are Sinking.

  • DIMMU: There have also been satellite measurements to back up the claim that the oceans are not rising. What will the liberals do when they find out the Arctic was too warm for ice (I went over this in another vid response to McCainisthrough) about 3 million years ago?

  • @UTubekookdetector did I say the ocean was rising ? NO, i said that the ocean floor is sinking because of the added weight of the melting ice/glaciers.

    the US Army/Nave/Govt. know there are some huge event coming that will affect all coastlines, and the water is in the Oceans Already.

    It has to do with the Bulge of water and Earth Gravity and rotation.

    One litle 'adjustment' on that, and a huge bulge of water will sweep the globe...

  • DIMMU: Reread my post, I know what you said, but I supplemented it with satellite info concerning sea levels. For example, see

    iceagenow . com/Arctic_Sea_Level_Falling . htm

  • @UTubekookdetector Yapp. Got it !! :D

  • @UTubekookdetector What is your conclusion on that Article ? ?

  • DIMMU: My conclusion is that we are not going to see the massive sea level rises that the Gorewellian scaremongers keep yammering about. In another video I went over a massive sea level rise in Mexico about 120,000 years ago (it's my

    I'm Voting Democrat video).

  • area does not equal volume.

  • What % of our atmosphere is greenhouse gases and what % of that is man made?

  • our atmosphere is 0.54%carbon dioxide and humans produce 6% of the total carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

    the Rothschilds owned International Monetary Fund(IMF)is the holding company that owns the UN.

  • All that money collected through carbon taxation won't go into repairing any environmental issue, it is going straight into the bankers coffers... think about it..

    Oh yeah, the CO2 contribution to our atmosphere is laughable, that is why the real numbers are never quoted... all you people wanting to be convinced that this Human Global Warming is a hoax, look up the CO2 content of our atmosphere and then look at that co2 and how much is contributed by human beings, then laugh real hard...

  • Good point Marcus.

    blog..heritage..org/2009/03/27­/man%e2%80%99s-contribution-to­-global-warming/

    or search for "Mans Contribution to Global Warming" if you can't get that link to work.

  • i suppose that samples taken from ice showing large increase in co2 in the last several decades isnt anything to worry about

    yup - wind packed up a bit of ice

    indisputable increase in global temps (short term i admit) but thinking about the big picture (i.e. plants sucking co2 out of the atmosphere for thousands of millennia suddenly being burned will NOT affect the environment in any way)

    If you don't think so then I guess i'll have to agree as it sounds like a convincing argument

  • "yup - wind packed up a bit of ice"

    Another powerful argument. This certainly does occur as does ice drifting into warmer currents.

    Actually in peer-reviewed studies (freewebs..com/professor_enigm­a/globalwarming2..htm) many ag staples have done better in higher CO2 levels.

    We've found higher CO2 levels in rock strata in the distant past, not much to be alarmed about.

    A global temp is too hard to calculate, too many variables but I wouldn't put much stock in those weather stations.

  • you are all delusional!

    look at long term trends and stop talking about short term variations

    oh OK! I guess the measurable increase in certain gasses in our atmosphere will have no effect on our environment...

    retards...

    sigh

    retards...

    delusional retards...

    i drive, fly AND heat my house but at least i accept that there may be a consequence

  • Pretty powerful argument there Spud. You want me to look at long-term trends? I did.

    We haven't had satellites "up there" for thousands of years but I did cite data from a peer-reviewed journal which analyzed satellite data for Antarctic ice from 1979-2002.

  • yup no satellites!

    i just about have the mental capacity to understand that.

  • i suppose that samples taken from ice showing large increase in co2 in the last several decades isnt anything to worry about

    yup - wind packed up a bit of ice

    indisputable increase in global temps (short term i admit) but thinking about the big picture (i.e. plants sucking co2 out of the atmosphere for thousands of millennia suddenly being burned will NOT affect the environment in any way)

    If you don't think so then I guess i'll have to agree as it sounds like a convincing argument

  • eh , yeah ,...

    why don't you come up with some facts instead of just stating your opinions?

  • al gore is probably the stupidest person on the entire planet...

  • I concur. When one mixes a very low IQ with a vacuous ideologue you get... Albert Gore Jr., the Senator's son.

  • haha. but it is sill amazing how many people have drank the kool aid with this whole global warming shit. with out even thinking about it.

  • People like McCainisthrough are generalized for a reason. She wants everyone to think she knows what she's talking about, but I surmise she copies videos because she can't put anything in her own words.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more