Added: 3 years ago
From: JmkLcAeJsm
Views: 15,408
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (659)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Stupid! +1

  • Wow, I can't believe creationists are so stupid

  • so this is against religion, not smart peop eheh atheist.. ok ..

  • There really is a human/chimpanzee hybrid! Honest. :)

    /watch?v=NPGUIpv-JxI

  • If the stronger and faster lion catches the food and wins mates, why have lions been the same for millions of years?

  • @GladiatorGT Can you show us a lion from a few million years ago for comparison?

  • @TrickWithAKnife Since atheists love fossils so much, you should have no problem looking it up yourself.

  • @GladiatorGT It was your example, but you're not prepared to back it up with evidence? Ah, but that is the christian way. Anyway, lions have decreased in size a lot over millions of years. The biggest lions are also the ones that need the most food. And not all atheists are interested in fossils. Some of us just happen to have an education outside of "because it's god's will".

  • @TrickWithAKnife The only way for a species to decrease in size over time, according to evolutionists, is for smaller individuals to breed more than larger individuals. Since smaller lions cannot win mates over larger lions, that throws your theory in the garbage. A small lion can go without food for a long time, but he won't spread his genes without beating a big strong lion and winning the pride. Atheists are like children who find their first book on a subject and think they're experts.

  • @GladiatorGT Scroll up, genius. You started off with "why have lions been the same for millions of years?". Want to admit you are just using google to appear like you know what you are talking about, or would you prefer to admit you are a lier?

  • @TrickWithAKnife I stand by what I wrote. Lions have been the same for at least 2 million years. I was defeating your ridiculous and uneducated argument. That high school textbook that has enamored you so much, the one that makes you think you're a biologist, is only giving you theories. If really had any vague concept of biology, you would know that something so complex cannot be explained by random mutations and natural selection. But you don't, so you're easily fooled.

  • @GladiatorGT You are really so idiotic as to think lions are exactly the same as 2 million years ago? Does actual physical evidence mean nothing to you? Does it need to be written in an out-of-date book to make sense with the phrase "because that was god's will" to make sense to you? Don't bother me with your ridiculous ideas that have already been dis-proven so much with hard evidence that it's not even debatable.

  • @TrickWithAKnife I agree with you 100%, but I don't understand why are you wasting your time with this retard? Do you REALLY think he's worth it???

  • @GladiatorGT you have know idea what the definition of a theory is do you........

  • @GladiatorGT "If really had any vague concept of biology..."

    You realize that pretty much every biologist would disagree with your nonsense?

  • If I can't disprove god, can you disprove the existence of beings and their way of life like childrens shows?

  • bunch of fancy words with irritated voice to confuse ppl, I have 1st grade kid question- If god created ppl - they should resemble his looks, right?..so we have Blacks, Whites, Asians, Arabs and Natives..they are all so different in looks..What color is god, and why he "created" so many races?..So, in this case bible and god lied that he created people in his own image,..so Mr Pippa can you answer 1st grade kid question?

  • @ImRussianJew Dumb question. God is not physical, and therefore not a color. If you understand hebrew, it is a complex language with many fewer words than modern english, and therefore much more meaning behind each word. it would be better explained in the words of an atheist, Aristotle, who devised the theory of forms. we are made similarly in essence to God. not in hysical makeup. that is like asking why arent all chairs identicle.

  • @lastandbesthope your explanation even dumber than my question..How its not Physical if bible said god created man in his likeness- its should be bones, blood & color? Hebrew? did you read name of my profile? exactly!! you can blew your bright bubbles of imagination..like you do it with your zombies(from your profile:)..as 4 Aristotle- my main question was about god and his image, so your chair "theory" is even dumber, you typical sneaky christian who going around the bushes

  • @ImRussianJew You ignored what i said. The bible is an english TRANSLATION of hebrew and ancient greek. you assume there is nothing non-physical about God, when in fact there is. the nature of things is not merely tied up in what it looks like. if you truly think that, then you must not believe in things such as character and honor. God is non-physical, therefore Physical likeness is not a concern, but rather that we are made in his spiritual image, like a shadow cast by a tree.

  • @lastandbesthope I do not assuming anything, I know it: character and honor are not gods- its moral that was thought 2 you by human flash like your mother, teacher, society even your church...nature in the matter of things actually tied up in everything in what it looks like: If I cannot see electricity- i see light-its called proof, fact. If bible mentioned likeness its should be no mistake or corrections "after the facts" .. shadow are not spiritual but physical (physics)..

  • @ImRussianJew do you not understand a simile? of course i cant give you a non-physical simile, as it compares two similar THINGS. a shadow from a tree is LIKE the image of God in man. i did not say character and honor are gods. if you dont believe in anything non-physical, you must not believe character and honor exist. i do not deny physics. i accept physics. God created them, and directs them.

  • @lastandbesthope yes I do understand a smile- its a reaction to human communication,if you smile to yourself its mean 2 things, its either you crazy or you thinking of something good, its not affect me in any way or shape.....If you talking catchphrases- about shadow and god..remember shadow never the same..its changing shape and not always look like a tree..bad example..and how did you decided I dont believe in honor if i told you its learning experience not just a fairy story

  • @ImRussianJew SIMILE. not smile. there is no such thing as a perfect analogy. if you are chosing to ignore what im saying and continue, there is no point in discussion. in your comments you have implied you dont believe in anything non-phyical, in which case you must not believe in something such as honor. the nature of the imago dei is non-physical. simple as that.

  • @lastandbesthope you like christian dictator that enforcing me to believe what ever you said its true, even its sound crazy, not valid and unprovable. I believe in facts not some frustrated person who canot prove or explain anything, so far u not proven anything even a shred of god existence. I believe in HONOR, I dont believe in GOD.. honor exist withing people, i never saw your god or his deeds within, I dont believe in imago dei, bcz god use to be white, now he's black LOL

  • Despite popular belife a theory is actually a theory for why a law does what it does

    Gravity is a law

    How gravity works and what causes it is a theory

  • blah blah blah whatever.. god doesn't exist anyways.

  • @SandmanJAAE Where did the particles in the big bang come from? how do you explain irreducable complexity? why do you have coherent thought if it is simply atoms moving? without God reality both has no point, and doesnt make sense.

  • @lastandbesthope Are you aware that there might be way more universes and dimensions than we imagined?

    "My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we CAN suppose." - J. B. S. Haldane

    The fact that we don't have a straight answer for this doesn't give us the right to invent an answer and declare it truth. Check out the Zeitgeist documentary.

  • @SandmanJAAE If making a statement that there are more universes than ours without any proof is less likely than saying there is a God when we have at least some evidence pointing towards it. if you agree with the scientific method, and trust it, then you will know that no theory is beyond refutation, and all theories are based upon non-conclusive evidence. in other words, believing evolution is akin to believing there is a God. why does everyone pit God against science?

  • @lastandbesthope whoaaa there is no evidence that points towards the existence of the judeo-chsistian god (which i assume is your god) specially when it stupidly mixes up morals with origin of the universe.. unlike the multiverse hypothesis which actually does gives us reason to believe in it.. for more info on it: wikipedia. org/wiki/Multiverse . Also this might actually be a hypothesis that someday could save the human race for when the sun finally becomes a planetary nebula!

  • @SandmanJAAE The fact that you are both here, and can think is evidence of a God. There is NO scientific explanation of how something came from nothing. It mixes up nothing. the analogy of the story of the fall and creation are two different stories, taking place roughly six chapters apart. that is like saying dumbledore dying happened at the same time he left to find the horcrux at the lake. we have millions of years before the sun is a concern.

  • @lastandbesthope You're forgetting something that crumbles the whole basis of your argument. We in the atheistic position do not believe that we came from nothing, we just deny that is was from god, we acknowledge the fact that something can not come from nothing, which is what you're stating. But what you are forgetting is that god, according to your religion came from nothing, created himself, or has always been there. Unlike us, that just accept we don't know were everything came from, YET.

  • @SandmanJAAE There is no one atheistic position, just as there is no one christian position. i cannot address all of them in 500 characters. if you want to sell me that there is no God, and that all things can be explained by science, dont tell me you dont have an explanation yet. Christianity has a full, developed explanation for the existence of everything. you dont. God always existed. science and religion are not at odds, and never will be. seven day creation is an analogy.

  • @lastandbesthope If Christianity has a full developed explanation there would be bast evidence to support it, which there isn't. And to say that the fact that we're here is evidence, it is not, it just brings up a question for which there is no real answer yet. And by saying god always existed is contradictory to your former argument of saying something can not come from nothing, which I agree.

  • @SandmanJAAE Nothing physical can be created from nothing without a God. guess its a good thing God isnt physical... if there is no God to design and direct thought, how can you explain sentience? evolution definately cant. God didnt come from nothing. He always was and is. there are plenty of things religion explains that science cant or hasn't. yes christianity is fully developed. read the bible. you can test that like any theory. find an inconsistency.

  • @lastandbesthope lets say ok, god created the universe and finally there is proof and all that, what evidence is there that we'll go to hell if we have premarital sex for example? or most importantly what evidence is there to support your religion and not Thor's religion for example?

  • @TheGreatC0mmie Good ! 4 u! leave me alone.

  • @TheGreatC0mmie U say I cant not spell.What about saying we dont came from monkeys.U r soooooooooo smart.....for a monkey.

  • @TheGreatC0mmie Oh poor baby dont poop ur pants.Whats the problem? You can have a theory ( a guess) but we are not allowed to believe in God.Poor pitiful little minded you.

  • @meredith2020 A scientific theory is not a guess. It's a conclusion drawn from all current evidence gathered. That is, it is the highest point an idea can reach in science. And it's very hard for a hypothesis to become a theory, as it has to be examined to the highest degree by peer review, which takes years.

    Please do not ever insult science by saying that a theory is a guess and or that "God exists" is a theory.

    Thanks.

  • @TheGreatC0mmie Wow ! and u think your intelligent? remember ur the idiot that came from a monkey.

  • @TheGreatC0mmie God made the universe!Just because you are able 2 learn how things work doesnt mean there is no God.You should be glad he gives u something 2 do.

  • Big bang is a big fairy tale!

  • Or perhaps just forgetting the question entirely and just observing the IQ score of atheists over theists...

    Problem solved ...

    If you are looking for the stupid side...look closer to home and leave the intellectuals out of it while you do so!

    Look, its like this bible readers.... you can argue among yourselves...the rest of us have a life to lead...we really don't have time for you puerile bullshit... now fuck off!

  • "Why has everything stopped moving?"

    That was really a question..?

  • if god doesn't exist, then how come he does exist?

  • @chadd990 And how do you know God exists? Why not naturalism or Gods (plurel) or aliens or some other science experiment? You can't just say "because the bible says so". That is like saying that Harry Potter is real because it says so in the book. My book says the flying spaghetti monster did it. So if the FSM doesn't exist, how come he exists?

  • @coolgreyoneabby

    when did I ever say the bible told me so? When did I ever say I was talking about yahweh? When did I ever say the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist? When did I ever say multiple gods don't exist (Plural, not plurel)?

    Fail strawman is fail.

  • @chadd990 OK fine. The only people I have run into that have an issue with evolution or the Big Bang are those creationists who take the Bible literally. So I'll ask you, if not the Big Band, then how did the universe come into existence?

  • @chadd990  Sorry Typo, Big Bang, not big band.

  • the big bang hahaha funny no such thing.its a fairytale

  • @meredith2020 Big bang a fairy tale? So you are rejecting the scientific process that sent a man to the moon, created antibiotics, discovered other galaxies, and makes your cell phone work in favor of the talking snake, woman made from a mans rib, animals in ark loaded two by two and guy who parted the red sea myth? To the rest of us, that is simply staggeringly willful ignorance.

  • @coolgreyoneabby Yes a Big fat fairy tale!God gave us a brain,so we are smart enough to send a man 2 the moon,make antibiotics,and discover his galaxies . Big bang no such thang.....hahahaha

  • @meredith2020 Sorry, but your religion is blinding you to reality. The exact same process used to decipher galaxies was used to understand the Big Bang. Creationists are all good with the benefits from science until it goes against their religious dogma, then you reject science in favor of iron age mythology from illiterate goat herders. believing in the talking snake, Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden myths over science is embarrassing. Creationism: The dumbing down of America.

  • @coolgreyoneabby Hey there are scientist that believe in God.Its ok that I believe in God,so whats it 2 ya? U people put us down every chance u get just because we know God is real.u get mad when we give u a taste of ur own medicine, leaves a bad taste in ur mouth doesnt it.

  • @meredith2020 I don't care if you believe in God, or leprechauns or the Lock Ness Monster, but for some reason, the religious love to stand on their respective milk crates and yell stupid shit like, "the Big Bang is a fairy tale" or whatever dumb shit thing you also believe that goes 100% against known scientific knowledge. You could be spewing religious dogma or just silly scientific ignorance. The funny part is that you don't even know the difference.

  • Stuck in the middle ages again, mister let's talk to invisible people that don''t talk back?

  • Evolution is so stupid!!! and according to those who believe it if we dont believe it we are consider dumb!

  • @evolutionissostuppid What so stupid about evolution? How about I say religion and god are so stupid. Do you realize religious people they are only one step ahead of wild creatures. Look what people are doing name of god and religion. If you don't open your mind and and try to understand how everything is functioning to you everything will be mystery. With religion you are willingly limiting your ability understand meaning of your true existence.

  • @evolutionissostuppid Well, your misuse of grammar and punctuation aside, it does make you seem dumb. No offense. Not saying your stupid, just ignorant. Ignorant: Lack of knowledge.

    When someone asks you if you *believe in evolution, don't say "no" or "I don't know," because that's like saying you don't believe in math.

  • let me answer question # 2 can you run 120 volts and 24 volts through the same wire obviously not because you know the reason. Remember if we can make computer chips to hold some memory, each sells is energy to, they are able hold memory also that is why each living thing keep certain pattern.

  • let me answer your question # 1 all the life form start from single sells and they multiply to the point where all the sells were able function in harmony and gain energy to survive. we usually we keep the same pattern the way energy expands If you have enough common sense you should be able see all the creatures alike they work in harmony for there common survival.

  • its harder to believe that the universe was started by nothing and then bang sumthin randomly exploded for no reason. its easier to believe that sumthin caused it to explode like God instead of nothing.

  • @daNDayati Paul of Damascus was an ancient figure famous in the Bible for his persecution of Christians and then his miraculous conversion after losing his sight and ability to speak, although the loss of ability to speak is a speculation on my part because I don't remember exactly. But I am an atheist and it has been quite a while since I've read the bible.

  • @atheistjacob Also, he was Saul before he was Paul. After his conversion he took the name Paul. If I remember correctly. Christians feel free to correct me as long as it is in a cordial manner. I am fine with corrections on this matter.

  • @daNDayati - that's exactly my point, non-believers are on their way to becoming a very good Christians just like  Paul of Damascus.... all i need now is the can opener. btw, how many were surveyed in the Pew Polls? let's say 3,000,000,000 people ? what makes you think that is accepted scientific evidence and proof ? even non-believers and infidels will not presume it's accurate.

  • @daNDayati - what is an atheist? are you serious? Atheists are people who are Christians but they just don't know it yet.

  • @ikawpipa

    "Atheists are people who are Christians but they just don't know it yet."

    I'm sure the population of japan would be interested in that... if they understood or cared what a christian was... so would he population of china, and 30% of India, 40% of Europe.... etc. and a chunk of ex-christians in the US...10% and growing on a yearly basis... without single knock on anyone door to tell them of the 'wonder of no god'

    Its dying... fucking cope with it!

  • @daNDayati - are atheists just molecules in motion ? cheers !

  • @daNDayati - in short, it failed. cheers !

  • @daNDayati - ok. i understand. do your family use chimpanzee organs for transplant ? cheers !

  • is the picture above the great+ grandfather of atheists ?

  • Yeah, it would make sense that the one fossil needed to tie the line together would be the one that has not been found.

    Makes complete sense to me!

  • @zLOSTNOMOREz Less than 1% of species leave fossils.

  • @eateroftheflame The thought of how many species are there that we know nothing about because they left no fossils has always intrigued me.

  • @eateroftheflame moreover of the ones that do leave fossils are less than one in 100k individuals which means not only have you find them.....but they represent a single individual from a large population...

    Which means at present there will be just one elephant fossil left from the current generation of their species.... a paleontologist in 100k year time would assume they went extinct about now....he/she would be correct. We just haven't realised that

  • not sure if trolling or serious

  • You don't LOOK stupid answering these questions, but it makes one FEEL stupid trying to explain something in 500 words to people who lack the most basic conception of the subject. Try explaining how a car works in 500 words to people who don't know what fire is.

  • I want to know what pusshes a cell to change and how can a deformed animal who has gone thrue several micro evolutions survive especially for millions of years. When nowdays we know a simple mutation can make a being unfit for life. I just want a clear example of this. Secondly I think I remember cells are made by carbon squeletons, and chemical joining so shouldn't this still happen today? Example carbohydrits or proteins they come from other cells or spontenously from the ground or air?

  • @1Surge Offspring are usually different from their parents in some small way. Is slightly curlier or lighter hair a "deformity"? But if the girls in the kid's straight-haired village find his curly hair appealing, this makes it more likely that he'll pass on his new curly-hair genes. If succeeding generations keep going for curly hair over straight, you'll see more curly heads over time. And cells are made in an animal by dividing, we call it "growth".

  • @GoblinXXX well one thing is hair andf hair isn't evolution in the works evolution is an obious change. example a fish grows feet like fins. And Thats is what I want to know using a human example. Lets say our future evolution makes us have 2 arms and 4 legs. So in maybe what 2million years we have 2 extra lumps growing out of us your telling me our body won't suffuer any consequnces for that? Besides its a betterment not a deformation won't our body's reject that? Like now tell us something we

  • @GoblinXXX extra somethig unneccesary? Shouldn't we have micro evolutions? even a few and I am not talking about features like eye skin or hair color. Im talking about genuine micro evolutions. Like skin becoming more scaly or teeth becoming more sharp? Yet if something like that happens instead of a betterment its a flaw. I don't know if I explaining myself on what I want. All I want is one of those creatures that is in the middle of humans and our last ancestor before the ape.

  • @1Surge "All I want is one of those creatures that is in the middle of humans and our last ancestor before the ape." If you want transitional fossils, TYPE THAT in google. "Transitional hominids" will give you human ancestors. There were many species between modern homo sapiens and our common ancestor with our cousins, chimpanzees and gorillas.

  • @GoblinXXX Thank you. I am a creationist but I do apriciate your your sincere intrest and patience. I will look up on what you said, also are this transitional himinids macro stages or micro? I'll look for it anyway but if you tell me you could save me time. And I want micro stage's realistic chance of survival. Cuase micro evolutions take millions of years right? So I want to know how can uncomplete creatures can survive that long.

  • @1Surge First, there is no distinction between "micro" and "macro". What you would call "macro" is just the small accumulated changes. Secondly, a picture is worth 1000 words, and I only have 500, here. Google what I said, and SEE the fossils. You can also look up the EVOLUTION MADE EASY series by Potholer54 here on YouTube, excellent videos that illustrate what you're asking.

  • C-c-c-c-c-c-combo breaker!....oh, to late

  • just... errr... well done!! it was like a call back. Here's your answers, now please fuck off and ask me something interesting... I especially liked the click at the end! consise!

  • so about 30/1000 are christian lets wip em all out

  • @ff7walkthru Oh Gosh!

    Surely we can get rid of christianity (or at least marginalise it) without resorting to mass murder! That's the kind of solution the bible might suggest!

  • @StrumstickJoe perhaps

  • This video only works for the believers of god. WE ARE NOT ALONE! Genetic manipulation. That explains the missing link. As long as a god is involved, we will NEVER know the truth. God (Alien) destroyed the tower of Babel because he was scared that people could accomplish ANYTHING. It wants us as docile slaves. Religion is in place to keep us from the truth. It's a scam.

  • 3:00 "Your anus has not been studied in enough detail to understand it's motion."

    Loloolololol

  • If humans evolved from monkeys then why haven't all monkeys evolved into humans?

  • @AwesomeCoosa

    Really? Seriously? I mean, is this really all that difficult to grasp?

  • @JmkLcAeJsm He's a troll, don't worry about it.

  • @JmkLcAeJsm Yeah it is, why haven't they all evolved by now?

  • @AwesomeCoosa Ok, apologies, but one has to assume trolling with a question like this.

    Evolution does not say that monkeys turned into humans, rather that monkeys and humans share a common ancestor. What actually happened was that of the various populations of apes in Africa, the population that gave rise to us found its forest habitat diminishing and had to adapt to life on the plains, which demanded bipedalism and bigger brains, and a greater reliance on tool use. In a nutshell :)

  • @JmkLcAeJsm Strange that science has yet to find Evolutions missing link.

  • @zLOSTNOMOREz

    There's nothing missing. Separately, the fact that we have any fossils at all is pretty damn lucky, considering that under the vast majority of conditions carcasses simply decay and are reclaimed. If there was something missing... it would make a lot of sense.

  • @zLOSTNOMOREz missing link XD

  • Comment removed

  • @JmkLcAeJsm This just proves evolution is based on faith too, in fact evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism. Neither can be tested because we cannot go back billions (or thousands) of years to observe the origin of the universe or of life in the universe.

  • @AwesomeCoosa 2) Evolution: not a story, made up because "there must be a reason and a cause, and I'm scared of death so there must be a soul and an afterlife!"

    Evolution: self-evident continuation of life on earth.

    Creationists can’t visualise the concept, so they hedge around it with “macro” & “micro”, but this just serves to show they don’t realise those two things are the same. Add to this the fact that they don’t want to believe it, and you have the perfect example of a closed mind.

  • @AwesomeCoosa 1) 99% of all the species that have ever lived on earth (including hominids) have become extinct. Homo sapiens only just survived the migration out of Africa following climate change. What kind of planned creation is this? Your god also thought up hammerhead sharks (?) and a fungus that grows exclusively in an ant’s brain, killing it, then growing out a tendril to entrap the next passing ant… etc. Evolution can explain these things, but your god, what’s his excuse…?

  • @StrumstickJoe What makes you think God didn't want us to migrate out of Afica? God created Hammerhea sharks, what's with the question mark? Evoulution is we all came from one single cell that separated to trillions of trillions of identical cells, if that's true then everything in the world would look alike but they don't. I think you're the one being closed minded about creation, not me being closed minded about evolution or the big bang.

  • @AwesomeCoosa PS I don't personally believe in the big bang, but it has a million squared more credibility and evidence than the primitive mythology of the bible.

    And your explanation of the "flaws" in evolution are trite beyond belief!

  • @AwesomeCoosa 2) …space, and “something” – which was a universe of astonishing chance and hazard. Then you have to believe it was all created for us, the central creatures, pathetically imperfect and under-evolved as we are.

    Name that time in history when “god” put his “perfectly-formed” hominids on the earth, and why “he” gave them a false archeological and dna history.

    No, don’t bother, it’ll be biblically derived rubbish

  • @AwesomeCoosa 1) I don't believe hammerhead sharks were created. How could you think I could be so thick?

    Creationism is at once a simplistic explanation of what “must have happened” and a call to believe in the most complex of contrivances. It requires you to imagine a mind in a void, perfect and complete, right and benevolent (though to whom?), and this entity “suddenly” felt a need to alter its perfect state and create time…

  • @AwesomeCoosa Your first question is..... (?) a total mystery to me! What ARE you talking about?

  • @StrumstickJoe Where did the sharks come from if they weren't created? You could say evoulution but we didn't come from a single cell that split, (like twins they would look the same). Time God created everything, the beginning of time duh. The Big Bang Theory is just a theory and has no scientific evidence has to it happening, that's why it's a theory and not a fact.

  • @AwesomeCoosa Who are you arguing with?

    I said I don't believe the big bang theory.

    There are no gods (duh)

    There is no magic. Read what I wrote. You are not reading it.....

    "PS I don't personally believe in the big bang, but it has a million squared more credibility and evidence than the primitive mythology of the bible.

    And your explanation of the "flaws" in evolution are trite beyond belief!"

    Half the people in the world are below average intelligence.

    Why do you persist in being one?

  • @StrumstickJoe Let me guess, you say that people who are Athiest are smarter right? Wrong most scientist believe in a personal God. The stories in the Bible have more evidence for them happening than Big Bang and evolution.

  • @AwesomeCoosa

    I don't believe in the big bang.

    I don't believe in the big bang.

    I don't believe in the big bang.

    I don't believe in the big bang.

    I don't believe in the big bang.

    I don't believe in the big bang. I don't believe in the big bang.

    And the stories in the bible have no evidence at all, though they do have the wishful support of a lost of people who believe in magic; are scared of death; who do not listen when they are spoken to with rationale and reason.

    People like you.

  • @StrumstickJoe Everything that happened in the Bible can be explained through science. You might say that science proves it thereforth God doesn't exist. God made it happen, he wouldn't do it through some weird way that couldn't be explained. Also you haven't given any form of science to back up your claim that God doesn't exist and evolution is real. Give me a rational explaination to prove that either God doesn't exist or evolution is real.

  • @AwesomeCoosa I think we've established that you're not a good listener.

    The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which somebody had decided not to see.

  • @AwesomeCoosa Same reason why elephants didn't evolve into humans. Also monkey is a stupid definition. Monkey = EVERY ape that has ever lived except humans... and that is a big fucking LOL.

    Humans and chimps/orangutangs/gorilas etc etc etc are ALL apes. Chimps and humans have a common ancestor, an ancestor that was NOT human nor chimp... get it?

  • @sugarpuffextrem Your an idiot. Your only arguement is we have a common ancestor but you don't know what it is. The "same reason why elephants didn't evolve into humans." What reason is that?  Humans aren't even in the same genus, tribe, or subfamily as apes you know that right? Maybe God created all things and that's why there is no one ancestor we can find, and why all things have different DNA but are simular not becuase of evolution but becuase God wanted to leave his finger print in our DNA

  • @AwesomeCoosa Yes i know what ancestor means, dumass. Chimps trive good enough to not be instinct thats why they stayed chimps same was as elephants stayed elephants and did not evolve into something else.

    Stop use words YOU dont know the meaning of. Not in same genus? Male chimps has same genus as male humans, and male rodents and even male fucking trees. No ofc humans are not in same tribe as apes, maybe a handful of scientists are temporarily during studies.

  • @AwesomeCoosa hell, not even 1% of the human population is in the same tribe as another human/ other humans.

    Wanted to leave fingerprint in our dna? Are you fucking stupid?

    How can you people be so fucking stupid but still have learned how to communicate in text?

  • @sugarpuffextrem 99% of all the species that have ever lived on earth (including hominids) have become extinct. Homo sapiens only just survived the migration out of Africa following climate change. What kind of planned creation is this? Their god also thought up hammerhead sharks (?) and a fungus that grows exclusively in an ant’s brain, killing it, then growing out a tendril to entrap the next passing ant… etc. Evolution can explain these things, but their god, what’s his excuse…?

  • @StrumstickJoe Theres loads of stuff that even a child would understand is far from sound and sane in religious explanation of stuff around us... but not these people :S

    No need to trying to have an argument with them, they don't want to know the truth so doesn't matter how sane and sound an argument is.

    The reason for this foolishness is most likely brainwashing from parents.

    Smack your kid with aqn open hand if he does something really stupid, no problem really... but this brainwach... CRUEL

  • @sugarpuffextrem Your too thick skulled to understand. I'll pray for you.

  • @AwesomeCoosa HE'S thick skulled!!

    He's more truthful and right than you'll ever be.

    You are duped and foolish - you are a happy slave.

    You are looking forward to an eternity that will never come - yet if it did it would be the most excruciating torture!

    Think what you wish for.

  • @StrumstickJoe Well, if your right and there's no Heaven or Hell, then we're still going to end up in the same place. If I'm right then I go to Heaven and live for eternity while non-believer go to Hell and get tortured for eternity. In short if your right then the same thing happens to you and me, if I'm right I live with God in glory.

  • @AwesomeCoosa What you are suggesting is called Pascal' Wager - and it is low and hypocritical.

    You're just believing just in case.

    Watch "Christopher Hitchens Pascal's wager" and learn.

    Come clean, find peace and clarity.

    have peace on earth for there is nothing more.

    And we should be glad about that!

  • @StrumstickJoe What if there is more to this world than just death?

  • @AwesomeCoosa There isn't.

    You would have to find evidence for an immortal "soul" and there isn't any - just wishful thinking.

    When you understand that there is nothing for the individual beyond life on earth, you will find it liberating, and you will value your life more.

    It is a fantasy that humans want to believe that "there must be more". but you should get over it; it destroys your value.

  • @AwesomeCoosa Religious people don't get to use the word "thickskulled" .. thats a paradox coming from people like you.

    Why even try to defend bibles explanation of origin of life and everything else when it cant be explained rationally. Religion is not about that and should not try to do that cause its bound to FAIL bigtime cause it wont make any sense whatsoever.

    Religion is about morale.. that is between 500 and several thousands years old... IE: FUCKING obsolete.

    Laws are enough mostly.

  • @sugarpuffextrem Study more on moral and laws. Give me examples of morales from the bible being obsolete. Laws are more vulnarable for obsoletion. They can't even pick up with fast growing technology. Bible morales are none movable but flexible and adapt to all situations. Most laws are subjectives making incredible injustices like killing all jews seperation of blacks and whites. Bible morales are objecive they have a meaning and a goal. Like treat others how you want to be treated.

  • @AwesomeCoosa If paper comes from trees why are there still trees?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

  • @AwesomeCoosa Why do we have hundreds of species of birds, why do we have hundreds of types of dog? because not every dog evolved to be exactly the same, same with birds. not all pre-human apes grew to be humans.

  • @AwesomeCoosa because we didn't come from monkeys homo-sapiens(us humans) and monkeys, came from a common ancestor then split off in our own directions that are seen today long since that common ancestor died off. Don't forget to read about homo-erectus and the others before us between that common ancestor and us and then your question would be why have all of them not died off if any of them were still here...we didn't evolve from TODAYS monkeys...hope that hepled

  • @warangel87 well, how are we sure monkeys didnt evolve from us?

  • @ShurtyIsTheCrew that kinda like asking how do we know wheels didn't come from cars first. what kinda point was that supposed to be? u jokin me :) whatever very funny though.

  • @AwesomeCoosa If god made man, why hasn''t man created god yet? Same dumb logic

  • @meliskgenki Man has created other god's...that's why we have different religions.

  • @AwesomeCoosa natural selection. you don't even know how it happened chimps also branched off to bonobos humans branched off to Netherlands but they are extincted.

  • @AwesomeCoosa Natural selection.. and intelligent design there are not to be any hybrids conformed by evolution.- Charles Darwin.

  • @AwesomeCoosa Its quite simple....its called a Common Ancestor...through mutation the ancestor of humans diverged Very Slightly from monkeys to go on and eventually evolve through further mutation into humans. Monkeys went the other way and the end result is you.

  • @bigtone12 (meaning the presenter here, not your good self, sorry for any confusion :) )

  • If pluto isn't a planet then WTF are migits?

  • @DragonsREpic People amaze me with their jokes every day :D

  • 99% of all the species that have ever lived on earth (including hominids) have become extinct. Homo sapiens only just survived the migration out of Africa following climate change. What kind of planned creation is this?? Your god also thought up hammerhead sharks (?) and a fungus that grows exclusively in an ant’s brain, killing it, then growing out a tendril to entrap the next passing ant… etc. Evolution can explain these things, but your god, what’s his excuse…?

  • @StrumstickJoe his excuse is porn

  • @StrumstickJoe God is a way to explain the things we don't understand,By creating a being that we don't understand we can justify stupidity. How would a desert dweller 3000 years ago explain a spaceship? "IT MUST BE GOD or at least an angel!" Because they were ignorant. Humans are not the only evolved life. We're not even advanced life. We're Noobs to the galactic community.Our arrogance can use a bitchslap of reality. Haha!

  • Y should always have to be the atheist with the large burden of scientific explanation when we are not the ones with the extraordinary claims! "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof"! How can the Earth b only 6000 y.o.? How can there b 7 Bilion ppl in less then 6000y (after the flood)? And were did th different races came from if evolution isn't true? How can millions of different animal(in pairs) fit inside a boat made by a 600 y.o.men?

  • @whatyouchating I dont give a shit.My initial point was im neither,trying to label someone due to there thoughts and beliefs is like telling them who they are.And you have no authority to do so,so I rest my case.

  • @Dude11191 Wrong.

  • @xTheFBP "Wrong" so whats that supposed to mean exacily?

  • @Dude11191 The term "Atheist" encompasses the 'Agnostic' stance.

    Atheism is not a hatred towards religion, as you put it.

  • @xTheFBP I never typed it was hate towards religion.I assumed it was anti-religious,as it seems,it is to me.But I dont consider myself anything,if people cant comprehend that then its just sad.

  • @Dude11191 It doesn't make sense. Ok, if you don't want to label yourself on the matter, fine. But if they were to split a group of people into 2 groups, ( Atheist & Theist ) even if you have no feeling towards religion and don't believe in a God, you're an atheist.

  • @xTheFBP I guess you could say that,but im still not either of em lol.

  • Athiest piss me off.

  • @Dude11191

    Theist angry. Theist smash.

    I lol'd

  • @JmkLcAeJsm Im not a theist.Dont label me please you christian.

  • Two possibilities:

    1. You're a moron, and don't understand that you can either by a theist or an atheist and those are exhaustive categories.

    2. You're an atheist and you piss yourself off.

    In either case, I'm still lol'ing

  • @JmkLcAeJsm Well,I seriously doubt your laughing at my comment.As with most "blablabla LOL" comments,no your not laughing.I dont consider myself anything,so you dont label me okay? In either case,your still an idiot "lol".

  • You're spectacularly wrong, I have a few people over for drinks, checking my comments in between showing people youtube vids, we're all laughing. Thanks for the entertainment :)

    You can either be atheist or theist, you can't be neither. An atheist is someone who isn't a theist. If you're 'nothing' then you're an atheist. Glad we sorted that out :)