It's interesting that the "in" thing is to take Mozart at incredibly fast paces. I am wholly convinced that this occurs less with other composers. A perfect example is 4:15 to 5:00 where there is an apparent misunderstanding for a perfect musical statement in an otherwise fast piece. Mozart enjoys to make statements in pieces and if you rush over them I believe you miss the point Mozart was trying to make, it's like a novel, you don't skip pages to get to the end.
Some commenters are apparently unaware of what an "Allegro". This is very fast. Where is the elegance of this concerto ? Towards the last tutti before cadenza , pianists lost the stability of communication caused by the very fast tempi during ascending e-flat scale and (probably) by the lack of rehearsals. Anyway , any concert done is well done. Good luck to these pianists in their career.
Pls. someone can tell me Who made the Cadenza of this Movement? of this version...
Unbeloved27 1 week ago
1:22 - 2:10
marcopecs 2 months ago
It's interesting that the "in" thing is to take Mozart at incredibly fast paces. I am wholly convinced that this occurs less with other composers. A perfect example is 4:15 to 5:00 where there is an apparent misunderstanding for a perfect musical statement in an otherwise fast piece. Mozart enjoys to make statements in pieces and if you rush over them I believe you miss the point Mozart was trying to make, it's like a novel, you don't skip pages to get to the end.
rockmenowamadeus 9 months ago
Comment removed
rockmenowamadeus 9 months ago
youtube.com/watch?v=wTjGrwqlwjQ for the Haskil Anda recording
TJFNYC212 9 months ago
Some commenters are apparently unaware of what an "Allegro". This is very fast. Where is the elegance of this concerto ? Towards the last tutti before cadenza , pianists lost the stability of communication caused by the very fast tempi during ascending e-flat scale and (probably) by the lack of rehearsals. Anyway , any concert done is well done. Good luck to these pianists in their career.
cartmanist 11 months ago
Some commenters are apparently unaware of what a Rondo is.
Jitpring 1 year ago
Bravo to the orchestra and soloists! Beautiful music!
music81dotnet 1 year ago
The concerto is beautiful, but these guys rock the tempo. Love it!
mmenchu 1 year ago
funny how influx of ignorance is so abundant. The piece IS that fast. Good lord...
Thilindel 1 year ago 2
3:11 - 4:05
Pianista061292 1 year ago
nice but ,,, i agree...kinda fast,, what's da rush?¿??
arturoatl 1 year ago
These guys lack stylistic grace of the period and play as if they were late and running to catch a bus.
freeqwerqwer 1 year ago
What a great perform!! With a lot of energy and vitality! Thanks!
HerrHansCastorp1 2 years ago 3
1:51 - 2:10
zorroag 2 years ago 9
@zorroag : exactly, flawless. Though you would say 0:00 - 6:28
mehrashk 1 year ago
@zorroag : exactly, flawless. Though you would say 0:00 - 6:28
mehrashk 1 year ago
@zorroag Heard at Amadeus XD!
Laudan08 11 months ago
astounding!
RSPSbroadcasts 2 years ago
Truly amazing piece. Would have been even better if Mozart was playing it.
ihamoitc2005 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
wankmaster 2 years ago
0:12-0:30, 3:20-3:40
kunstistmist 2 years ago
i love this concerto so much.
just insanely beautiful
JHeifetz100 2 years ago 6
do you mean Mozart's concerto for 3 pianos, or Beethoven's Triple?
traccan 3 years ago
Great concerto - although the triple concerto is better constructed in my view!
HURLEYP 3 years ago