Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • CHECK this out yourself :)

    COMPARISON of Specifications LCA & JF ________

    Dry thrust: LCA=53.9kN & JF= 49.4 kN________

    Thrust with afterburner: LCA= 85 kN & JF=84.4 kN________

    Internal Fuel Capacity:LCA=2,458 Kg & JF=2300 kg________

    G-limit:LCA=+9/−3.5 g & JF=+8.5 g________

    Maximum speed: LCA=2,376+ km/h & JF=2,205km/h________

    Range:LCA=3,000 km (1,840 mi) without refueling JF= 1,352 km________

    (source WIKII)

    Hope you can make out yourself which is the Better Aircraft

  • @DbigXray Source of info : Wikipedia? God i dont know whats the credibility of you indians..BULLSHIT and pathetic comment and why do you people always drag wiki in every argument..Anybody even i can edit information on wikipedia..Your own HAL Tejas engineers admitted that LCA was a failure..Planned in late 80,s and after consuming millions of dollar its still not fully operational whereas thunder took half the time and money,And now kicking your arse.Argue if you have got a valid point.

  • @sameeullahather LoL at your Ignorance.. Oh Really "YOU cAN EDIT THE WIKI" WHY dont you give it a try ? and see if it stays LOL ... your comments show the level of ignorance and THe pleasure you gain on Living in your own false delusions. if you dont trust it their are links in wiki. LCA is not a failure as the above statistics suggest , but in fact your JF is a looser as compared to the LCA besides LCA is not the only plane in IAF , seems like you forgot the Su 30 , MMRC, Mirages and so on.

  • @DbigXray No worries our SAMs are much faster and lethal then your Sukhois and Mirage and i pity you dont waste your money on MMRCA.

  • @DbigXray Does the design of LCA finished?I've been told that LCA was start to design from 1980..God,period of pregnancy is longer than F22.so It must advanced than F22

  • @zzy8676 Just to Inform you , in case you are still reading the old newspapers . YES it is in use with the Indian air force and as the above statistics show TEJAS is lot better than your JUNK FIGHTER (JF) 17.

  • @DbigXray yeah but its not the gun its the man behind a gun we all know how paf pilots fucked your 6-8 high tech planes with a sabre :D LOL

  • Long live China and Pakistan

  • j10 has better specs but jf 17 is definitely sexier of the two

  • May long live the evergreen everlasting Pakistan - China friendship!!!

  • Congratulations to Pakistan for achieving this milestone. I also congratulate Pakistan for indigenously developing Tomahawk cruise missile, capable of carrying nuclear payload. Only countries in the world capable of that technology are Pakistan and USA.

  • great.........................­........

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more