The new Martin needs a better set up and a better performance of the piece.. The old Martin sounds great but a little to loose.. And of course the player is much more comfortable on it and finds it easier to play .. Ease of playing seems to be necessary here .. So it's not a fair comparison .. Although I'm sure the old guitar is much sweeter it would be nice to hear the new one played without so many weak notes.
These re-issues are amazing I have a 1997 0016DBR 12 fret slot peghead which has scollped bracing . herrringbone inlay and it sounds and plays so good with light gauge strings that I sit around the house and and play it more than my 1943 Herringbone.
Martin doesn't claim that a new Authentic or Golden Era model sounds the same as an actual original. That is of course impossible. They need to be played in vigorously, and age several decades, to get close. All the designation means is that the new instruments are built with generally the same specs, and where possible, the same type of materials as the beautiful pre-war vintage models. A 1937 D18 and a 1985 D18 have a lot of differences, even more so the rosewood-body models (21 up).
Brazilian rosewood is not extinct but it's endangered or threatened. Brazil outlawed its export long ago, and it was added to the CITES list of endangered species in 1991. Other varieties of rosewood such as Indian and Madagascar are not on the list. Some guitar makers still use Brazilian in extremely high-end instruments--using wood that was cut and exported prior to 1991. I wouldn't buy a new one, but its hard to argue with the appeal of a pre-1969 Martin.
They each sound quite distinct from one another. Although both sound good, I don't think calling the reissue an authentic representation of the '37 original is accurate at all.
@leonkennedy74 no replica will sound like a 70 year old guitar though, there are resins in wood that harden over the years...but if they can make a guitar that sounds quite close to a vintage guitar now, then in 70 years imagine how it will sound
@treatb09 I'm not saying the guitar doesn't sound great, I'm saying that it doesn't sound anything like the legit vintage. I understand the resins in the soundboard, etc all make the sound as well. You make a good point with the old replica though, It'd be very interesting to look at those compare to the guitars they were replicated after in the same period of time.
@leonkennedy74 also if that 000-18a is directly out of the box this video is just a bad comparison, the first year the guitar develops massively if played
So... this is a great comparison, but we shouldn't assume that both guitars are identical in setup. That much of a sound difference could just be new vs old strings (I doubt that's the case here though). The real 37 sounds like it could really benefit from a setup, it's buzzing a lot.
both song nice, subtle difference only, the old 000-18 have a smoother, rounder tone typical sound of an aged mahogany martin, i did have the om-18v, and it sounded very similar to your old 000-18. The new 000-18 authentic have a slightly more overtone, just slightly, maybe from the strings, and have the typical marquis GE powerful forward brazing sound, Nice guitar,but the authentic 000-18 sounded abit modern, which is still a good sound. nice picking btw
I also have a 37 000-18, and it sounds great-The tune he is playing is Chuck Berry, Promised Land, whether it is intentionally that or not, I don't know. "Left my home in Norfolk Virginia, California on my mind, Straddled that Greyhound, rode it past Raleigh and all across Caroline..."
The new Martin needs a better set up and a better performance of the piece.. The old Martin sounds great but a little to loose.. And of course the player is much more comfortable on it and finds it easier to play .. Ease of playing seems to be necessary here .. So it's not a fair comparison .. Although I'm sure the old guitar is much sweeter it would be nice to hear the new one played without so many weak notes.
MatthewOTuama1 2 weeks ago
The vintage sounds much sharper with bright loud tones…. I hope my D15 improves with age & some play time.... :-)
JoMoMoss 1 month ago
canyou do without the profanity ????
kfwahine 2 months ago
@kfwahine fuck you
sirgreggins8824 2 months ago
Authentic sounds young tone with desirable tension, 1937 sounds punchy deep open sound, both are nice to listen to.
SUNNYBULS 2 months ago
second one sounds better looks better but this is the most boring shit
BMXplease11 2 months ago
The second sound !
Bigerjoel 4 months ago
These re-issues are amazing I have a 1997 0016DBR 12 fret slot peghead which has scollped bracing . herrringbone inlay and it sounds and plays so good with light gauge strings that I sit around the house and and play it more than my 1943 Herringbone.
bgrass11 4 months ago
The old one sounds much more alive!!
bottomfeeder73 9 months ago 4
@bottomfeeder73 i agree, the vintage one sounds much better. but in my dreams could i afford that one.
tom27j 8 months ago
Great soundin' guitar.
fngrpkn06 9 months ago
Martin doesn't claim that a new Authentic or Golden Era model sounds the same as an actual original. That is of course impossible. They need to be played in vigorously, and age several decades, to get close. All the designation means is that the new instruments are built with generally the same specs, and where possible, the same type of materials as the beautiful pre-war vintage models. A 1937 D18 and a 1985 D18 have a lot of differences, even more so the rosewood-body models (21 up).
billsdubious 1 year ago
@billsdubious i dont think you can still get rosewood outa brazil,i hear it's extinct
hanghang71 1 year ago
@hanghang71
Brazilian rosewood is not extinct but it's endangered or threatened. Brazil outlawed its export long ago, and it was added to the CITES list of endangered species in 1991. Other varieties of rosewood such as Indian and Madagascar are not on the list. Some guitar makers still use Brazilian in extremely high-end instruments--using wood that was cut and exported prior to 1991. I wouldn't buy a new one, but its hard to argue with the appeal of a pre-1969 Martin.
billsdubious 1 year ago
I have a 1960 vintage. It sounds much more like the vintage 1937. I am surprised how close.
punkdolphin21 1 year ago
They each sound quite distinct from one another. Although both sound good, I don't think calling the reissue an authentic representation of the '37 original is accurate at all.
leonkennedy74 1 year ago
@leonkennedy74 no replica will sound like a 70 year old guitar though, there are resins in wood that harden over the years...but if they can make a guitar that sounds quite close to a vintage guitar now, then in 70 years imagine how it will sound
treatb09 1 year ago
@treatb09 I'm not saying the guitar doesn't sound great, I'm saying that it doesn't sound anything like the legit vintage. I understand the resins in the soundboard, etc all make the sound as well. You make a good point with the old replica though, It'd be very interesting to look at those compare to the guitars they were replicated after in the same period of time.
leonkennedy74 1 year ago
@leonkennedy74 also if that 000-18a is directly out of the box this video is just a bad comparison, the first year the guitar develops massively if played
kaptenmax 1 year ago
So... this is a great comparison, but we shouldn't assume that both guitars are identical in setup. That much of a sound difference could just be new vs old strings (I doubt that's the case here though). The real 37 sounds like it could really benefit from a setup, it's buzzing a lot.
NylonStrungGirl 1 year ago
The old one sounds much more open. Kinda night and day IMO. New Martin's are very decent guitars and with some time it will open up.
Great comparison.
Moods45 2 years ago
both song nice, subtle difference only, the old 000-18 have a smoother, rounder tone typical sound of an aged mahogany martin, i did have the om-18v, and it sounded very similar to your old 000-18. The new 000-18 authentic have a slightly more overtone, just slightly, maybe from the strings, and have the typical marquis GE powerful forward brazing sound, Nice guitar,but the authentic 000-18 sounded abit modern, which is still a good sound. nice picking btw
jazzysam1314 2 years ago
The old one has way better sound.
sanQ 2 years ago
The old one is a lot better to my ears.
Timbertone 2 years ago
The 37 sounds brighter and clearer.
ryan06105 2 years ago
So the new one sounds warmer?
ex0ja 2 years ago
nice the the v neck martins.
12Radius 2 years ago
I also have a 37 000-18, and it sounds great-The tune he is playing is Chuck Berry, Promised Land, whether it is intentionally that or not, I don't know. "Left my home in Norfolk Virginia, California on my mind, Straddled that Greyhound, rode it past Raleigh and all across Caroline..."
pokechop22 2 years ago
good playing, nice guitar.
apekuk 2 years ago
Comment removed
12Radius 2 years ago
So--did both guitars have new strings in same gauge and model?
tomdadomdomdom 2 years ago 3
What tune are you playing? It sounds great!
Henjo29 2 years ago
great video ! The 37 000 18 is very impressive !
Benja123456 2 years ago
Wow what a differnce 70 years makes.
admtutt 2 years ago