Mr.Robertson thank you for giving us the WTC's. What iconic buildings they were & I surely miss them. I hope he does not shoulder any burden. Nobody when this design was implemented could have possibly known that passenger jets would be flown into them intentionally that were full of fuel. Terrorism was HARDLY a factor in our lives waaaayy back then 'in the good old days'. God bless him for his contribution. What a forward thinker of his time.
Thousands? Think of terms like "compartmentalization" & "on a need to know basis".
Hypothetically, I'm a man who has inside information that the official 9/11 story is a lie. I consider the best case scenario of coming forth & speaking out is that I'm victimized by a shadow gov't campaign to discredit me & labelled a crackpot by a bunch of Micheal Shermer wannabes. The worst case scenario is that I jeopardize the life of myself or even my family. Guess what? I'm apprehensive.
@tripmatt1 I absolutely AGREE with you. It has always seemed to me that the conspiracy theorists overlook the glaringly OBVIOUS in favor of their convoluted 'theories' & are hell bent on sticking with them no matter what is brought to their attention in terms of rational explanations.
also we must take into account that the cast iron although it has high resistance for fire. it has limits. jet fuel combined with any other explosion in the floors combined to cause a towering inferno. the iron resisted long enough to have people get out. however the materials melted causing the support beams to collapse then causing a domino effect all that load crashing over the lower floors. simple physics!!
fuxking national geographic! why haven't they show a part of an interview where robertson clearly says it was designed to resist a planecrash at any location. is national geographic in the same hands as cnn, fox news and other shity brainwashers
not true. it was the biggest passanger plane with 4 engines the size of 747. And it is no difference loaded or not. these buildings collapsed after a long time. not at the moment of crash when the fuel exploded and all burned out in a few seconds. even a fuel fire does not change the strength of steel.
the moment of falling looked like a wulcanic eruption. steel cuted at the angle, same length peaces, concrete poverized, geothermal maps showing temperatures of 2000degrees calcius, free fall speed, symetrical fall, melted steel, building wtc7, explosions before collaps, motivs, sick people, pentagon ufo(haha)crash, hijackers alive, sponsors, profit, Al-keida history, BIn Ladens, manipulation with invisible ennemy. no way a gravity. simple? just think who told you and me to be stupid.
He, as all of us, only knows the conclusions that demolitions experts contracted by the government had to say. All any of us have to go on is what we were told.
If you choose to believe in conspiracy theories be my guest but it is another thing to slander people whose raison d'etre is the structural design of buildings to last well beyond our lifetimes.
I sincerely wish that you would use a bit of discretion when casting about these libelous assumptions about a particularly singular human being.
Leslie Robertson of course continues to work at his passion, and his expertise is highly sought throughout the world.
It is a gross injustice to so irresponsibly slander him as a liar and conspirator. He is a structural engineer and not a demolitions expert.
If there is a conspiracy, Mr Robertson was not a part of it, nor does he have the security clearance - nor the expertise - to have examined the rubble of September 11th and been able to draw any reasonable conclusions.
@SMR18NY I agree, up to a point: At some point he has to wake up. ae911truth shows it is possible for even architects to wake up. Physicists are just waking up. Yet folks in single wides see the truth! I don't want to believe he is a rat but at some point he needs to wake up and say the truth. Here is a good interview watch?v=nGgM81JFNrM
@IExposeMormonism Well of course it's the people in the 'single wides' who "SEE THE TRUTH"! That would explain these nutty theories. Makes perfect sense. lol. It's only the most highly edukated dat see da trut.
@jlalewicz To see how Stupid You are, go to AE911Truth and see some real interviews with Physicists, Architects, Engineers, demolition experts and senators. Where do little inept piss ants like you crawl in from. To see how the WTC was Really built got to ctv911, he has hundreds of hours of original documentaries on its construction, WTC interviews on the collapse, etc. Get educated and you wont look so stupid, moron.
@IExposeMormonism Yep I've SEEN documentaries on how the trade centers were built. THAT coupled with some basic understanding of velocity & phyics explains how the COLLAPSE of these buildings occurred. That's 'collapse', not 'demolition'. Oh & yeah...I think 'truthers' are nuts.
@jlalewicz Many of the documentaries are wrong. One NOVA program quoted the engineer Matthys Levy saying that the fires melted the structural steel. That's impossible. Jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees tops. It takes 2700 degrees to melt steel. See my video:
@Lan5in6 I said what I said: something melted the steel. We know the fire didn't melt the steel, because jet fuel and office fires don't burn hot enough to melt steel. I said there is no evidence (aside from the fact that the building fell down) that fire weakened the steel, because NIST has no core steel samples showing heat-weakening--nothing over 250 C. .
@IExposeMormonism LOL Sorry I've SEEN those 'truther' videos & documentaries. I don't simply judge someone as kooky if I don't at least listen to their position. Sorry, still think the conspiracy theorists are nuts.
@jlalewicz Well, there you go, no need to look further, no need to look at the 20 or so new expert testimonies just posted at AE911Trtuh, . Ignore the firemen, the witnesses, just listen to your tv set and those that didn't hear explosions, so , that nullifies those that heard explosions. No one is lying to you, everything is ok
@IExposeMormonism Well just how FAR do you want people to 'look' in order to try to make sense of your all's convoluted theories? There is not a single event that occurred in the collapse of those buildings that cannot be simply explained by the laws of gravity & basic physics. As to the 'explosions'? Have you listened closely to the video sounds as those building fell? What many initially interpreted as 'explosions' were later revealed to be each floor falling onto the next creating a huge boom
@jlalewicz take a flying fuck at the moon, see how that goes. You and your ilk can remain as blind as it pleases you. Intentionally or otherwise. 1 floor every 1/8th of a second, over 5000 tons every 1/8 of a second, gone, no concrete, no office contents hit the ground. 8 floors per second, sequentially. 40K tons/second. No office contents hit the ground. No concrete. Sequentially including the first floor, no concrete floor. 220+ acres of concrete and office contents are missing. Like your mind
@SMR18NY if he was so great why where his towers built so weak? no he built them strong like any other, but the government had explosives implanted afterwards.
Was this at 2:16 a part of the (former) under ground core of the building? What else can it be?!
74pbg 4 months ago
watch?v=rjmHqES_lto
vsv23te 8 months ago
Leslie Robertson said he saw molten steel flowing at Ground Zero. Then he denied that anyone had seen it. See my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 8 months ago
Mr.Robertson thank you for giving us the WTC's. What iconic buildings they were & I surely miss them. I hope he does not shoulder any burden. Nobody when this design was implemented could have possibly known that passenger jets would be flown into them intentionally that were full of fuel. Terrorism was HARDLY a factor in our lives waaaayy back then 'in the good old days'. God bless him for his contribution. What a forward thinker of his time.
jlalewicz 9 months ago
For more about Leslie Robertson and Ground Zero see my video:
9-11 Engineers Acting Crazy
watch?v=DF4C6qtU_Fc
punxsutawneybarney 9 months ago
Thousands? Think of terms like "compartmentalization" & "on a need to know basis".
Hypothetically, I'm a man who has inside information that the official 9/11 story is a lie. I consider the best case scenario of coming forth & speaking out is that I'm victimized by a shadow gov't campaign to discredit me & labelled a crackpot by a bunch of Micheal Shermer wannabes. The worst case scenario is that I jeopardize the life of myself or even my family. Guess what? I'm apprehensive.
jelinto 2 years ago
Why would thousands of people lie for the Govt smart guys? No fucking way thousands of people could be quiet about this.
tripmatt1 2 years ago
@tripmatt1 I absolutely AGREE with you. It has always seemed to me that the conspiracy theorists overlook the glaringly OBVIOUS in favor of their convoluted 'theories' & are hell bent on sticking with them no matter what is brought to their attention in terms of rational explanations.
jlalewicz 9 months ago
That's one huge ass helo...
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago
also we must take into account that the cast iron although it has high resistance for fire. it has limits. jet fuel combined with any other explosion in the floors combined to cause a towering inferno. the iron resisted long enough to have people get out. however the materials melted causing the support beams to collapse then causing a domino effect all that load crashing over the lower floors. simple physics!!
carloslaran 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was an inside Job
InsideJob4911 3 years ago
fuxking national geographic! why haven't they show a part of an interview where robertson clearly says it was designed to resist a planecrash at any location. is national geographic in the same hands as cnn, fox news and other shity brainwashers
dzonybazuka84 3 years ago
a normal plane, most like a single engine one. NOT A FULLY FUELED 747!
thugix 3 years ago
not true. it was the biggest passanger plane with 4 engines the size of 747. And it is no difference loaded or not. these buildings collapsed after a long time. not at the moment of crash when the fuel exploded and all burned out in a few seconds. even a fuel fire does not change the strength of steel.
LandlordsBelleview 3 years ago
watch?v=yicMyvf0BpA
zqewkl 2 years ago
the moment of falling looked like a wulcanic eruption. steel cuted at the angle, same length peaces, concrete poverized, geothermal maps showing temperatures of 2000degrees calcius, free fall speed, symetrical fall, melted steel, building wtc7, explosions before collaps, motivs, sick people, pentagon ufo(haha)crash, hijackers alive, sponsors, profit, Al-keida history, BIn Ladens, manipulation with invisible ennemy. no way a gravity. simple? just think who told you and me to be stupid.
LandlordsBelleview 3 years ago 4
they said it could sustain multiple impacts but who gives a shit
wesia4lia 3 years ago
Both buildings sustaned the imapcts from the planes. It was the damge and the fires they left behind.
Kyles45Angel 2 years ago
watch?v=yicMyvf0BpA
Here it is.
zqewkl 2 years ago
so...in order to gain contracts he places blame on himself for making the towers too weak? WHAT?
i'd think he has a vested interest in DEFLECTING blame from his failings as a structual engineer, rather than accepting it.
naard 3 years ago
He, as all of us, only knows the conclusions that demolitions experts contracted by the government had to say. All any of us have to go on is what we were told.
If you choose to believe in conspiracy theories be my guest but it is another thing to slander people whose raison d'etre is the structural design of buildings to last well beyond our lifetimes.
I sincerely wish that you would use a bit of discretion when casting about these libelous assumptions about a particularly singular human being.
SMR18NY 3 years ago
Leslie Robertson of course continues to work at his passion, and his expertise is highly sought throughout the world.
It is a gross injustice to so irresponsibly slander him as a liar and conspirator. He is a structural engineer and not a demolitions expert.
If there is a conspiracy, Mr Robertson was not a part of it, nor does he have the security clearance - nor the expertise - to have examined the rubble of September 11th and been able to draw any reasonable conclusions.
SMR18NY 3 years ago 9
@SMR18NY I agree, up to a point: At some point he has to wake up. ae911truth shows it is possible for even architects to wake up. Physicists are just waking up. Yet folks in single wides see the truth! I don't want to believe he is a rat but at some point he needs to wake up and say the truth. Here is a good interview watch?v=nGgM81JFNrM
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
@IExposeMormonism Well of course it's the people in the 'single wides' who "SEE THE TRUTH"! That would explain these nutty theories. Makes perfect sense. lol. It's only the most highly edukated dat see da trut.
jlalewicz 9 months ago
@jlalewicz To see how Stupid You are, go to AE911Truth and see some real interviews with Physicists, Architects, Engineers, demolition experts and senators. Where do little inept piss ants like you crawl in from. To see how the WTC was Really built got to ctv911, he has hundreds of hours of original documentaries on its construction, WTC interviews on the collapse, etc. Get educated and you wont look so stupid, moron.
IExposeMormonism 9 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Yep I've SEEN documentaries on how the trade centers were built. THAT coupled with some basic understanding of velocity & phyics explains how the COLLAPSE of these buildings occurred. That's 'collapse', not 'demolition'. Oh & yeah...I think 'truthers' are nuts.
jlalewicz 9 months ago
@jlalewicz Many of the documentaries are wrong. One NOVA program quoted the engineer Matthys Levy saying that the fires melted the structural steel. That's impossible. Jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees tops. It takes 2700 degrees to melt steel. See my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 9 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney You got the wrong end of the stick you cunt. The fires didn't melt the steel, but they did weaken it.
Lan5in6 3 months ago
@Lan5in6 Something melted the steel. If it wasn't the fires (and it wasn't the fires) what was it?
There's not even any evidence that fires weakened the steel. NIST has not one piece of core steel that shows heating sufficient to weaken it.
punxsutawneybarney 3 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney You're saying something melted the steel...but that the fires didn't weaken the steel?
Steel loses ultimate strength at increasing temperatures, look at some of the graphs, at 600 celcius it has half its normal strength. Enough said.
Lan5in6 3 months ago
@Lan5in6 I said what I said: something melted the steel. We know the fire didn't melt the steel, because jet fuel and office fires don't burn hot enough to melt steel. I said there is no evidence (aside from the fact that the building fell down) that fire weakened the steel, because NIST has no core steel samples showing heat-weakening--nothing over 250 C. .
punxsutawneybarney 3 months ago
@IExposeMormonism LOL Sorry I've SEEN those 'truther' videos & documentaries. I don't simply judge someone as kooky if I don't at least listen to their position. Sorry, still think the conspiracy theorists are nuts.
jlalewicz 9 months ago
@jlalewicz Well, there you go, no need to look further, no need to look at the 20 or so new expert testimonies just posted at AE911Trtuh, . Ignore the firemen, the witnesses, just listen to your tv set and those that didn't hear explosions, so , that nullifies those that heard explosions. No one is lying to you, everything is ok
IExposeMormonism 9 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Well just how FAR do you want people to 'look' in order to try to make sense of your all's convoluted theories? There is not a single event that occurred in the collapse of those buildings that cannot be simply explained by the laws of gravity & basic physics. As to the 'explosions'? Have you listened closely to the video sounds as those building fell? What many initially interpreted as 'explosions' were later revealed to be each floor falling onto the next creating a huge boom
jlalewicz 9 months ago
@jlalewicz take a flying fuck at the moon, see how that goes. You and your ilk can remain as blind as it pleases you. Intentionally or otherwise. 1 floor every 1/8th of a second, over 5000 tons every 1/8 of a second, gone, no concrete, no office contents hit the ground. 8 floors per second, sequentially. 40K tons/second. No office contents hit the ground. No concrete. Sequentially including the first floor, no concrete floor. 220+ acres of concrete and office contents are missing. Like your mind
IExposeMormonism 9 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Um kay...nutter:)
jlalewicz 9 months ago
@SMR18NY Leslie Robertson was a paid consultant on the NIST Report.
Robertson contradicts himself. watch?v=hLCwq3-RzZs
Fellow NIST paid consultant Charlie Thorton contradicts himself: watch?v=nGgM81JFNrM
NIST's lead investigator contradicts easily observable reality: watch?v=4ZrcDTjkIhI
NIST hide's their findings, rather than share them, which is the way science is done: watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk
Anyone suggesting that it is slander to call out Robertson for taking part in this is ridiculous.
iBlindGame 10 months ago
@SMR18NY if he was so great why where his towers built so weak? no he built them strong like any other, but the government had explosives implanted afterwards.
sh9683 3 months ago