The dumbest anti teaparty protester EVER! Part 3 Washington DC 4/15/2010

[halloranedward]

and yet if I were to beat him into a juicy pulp with an axe handle, I'd be the one to go to jail.

[LacobrigusRomanicus]

Cuban life expectancy is indeed higher than the American one. The healthcare system is also better. Deal with it ;)

[neimadize]

Do you think his liberal teachers also brainwashed him to look like a total tool?

[MarioMUniversal]

I find 80% of Liberals are douche bags

[TheJcp1234]

Don't go to college kids. You get dumber.

[TheLiberalSoup]

@TheJcp1234

why do you think that

[ResponsibleGunOwner]

You can't undo 12 years of public school in 15 minutes.

[bsabruzzo]

Let's examine a few logical facts:

- If all the "workers" (300 million) owned the means of production, there would be 300 million companies competing and eventually a few 100 will become dominate and will buy out or hire the less successful. Capitalism wins over socialism.

- RE the Cuban healthcare: the man's arcument is akin to "everybody in Cuba is eating crap rather than steak, but at least every is eating rather than the 95% in the US on steak and the 5% on hamburger".

Yeah, right.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

We all know the German Monkey is another Obama idiot which means that he's a sheep. He hears shit, believes it and repeats it. He is too stupid to research the truth. He is too stupid to comprehend information from reliable sources. He has no spine. He is a sissy. A Loser.

[GermanMonkey16]

All i see in this video is someone trying to explain their points, and a bunch of idiots not letting him talk. Constantly interrupting him and not letting him speak

[CornFedArmen]

well all the production went to china so i guess it's mentally retarded to stand around talking about who should control the means of production. all of these people a mentally retarded b/c they are arguing about things that have no real importance whatsoever.

[SamWiseGingy]

Thank you protestors. Good work.

Thanks for trying.

What's up with the burning cross?

[nasalstyle]

what... a... dummy... LOL. I create something.. I market it.. I spend my own fortune to develop..improve concept..pass it through the various regulations on my own dime.. spend my money to secure enough of my product to put on shelves..and the leftist here demands to take it and own it (the workers own the prodcution). then wants to demand what I charge for it.. ... is that right?

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

of course capitalism has some faults you retard. who said it didn't? that's why you people are so dumb because you're brainwashed so badly. get a life idiot. capitalism has some faults. socialism is an entire fault. there's NOTHING good about it. It has failed everywhere, even in small countries. I dont care what your hippie professor told you about denmark- he lied to you! IDiot..capitalism is BOSS!!! Get over it loser! Its why yoy have the ability to type on your nice computer you dickhead.

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom Sir, I find it quite odd that you think you're getting your point across by viciously slandering people. And just because someone's an intellectual doesn't make them a hippie socialist. I doubt you even know what socialism is.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

I find it quite gross that you smoke the bologne pony: your point? I have defined socialism perfectly if you ever bothered to read the content on the site fucktard.

We've had socialism since the 70's you moron. We are jumping to Marxism and I have proved that easily beyond a reasonable doubt and you can't do anything about it loser. Got it? Man up ya little pussy. It isn'y my fault the democrats are ruining the country more than the republicans are. I like libertatians and true conservatives

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom I can't get to your site since the link keeps saying its broken, but I have no doubt that someone who uses homophobic insults has all that much intellectual input on socialism and Marxism. Every time you make a childish insult towards someone whose trying to respectfully make a point to you, you lose credibility. You can curse and say "fuck you," but calling people pussies and saying that you find men who have sex with other men disgusting is offensive and just plain stupid.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

Maybe it's because you're retarded like your computer is. Maybe the site doesn't like you. You are repulsive., BUT 54,000 others seem to get to it every month..lol

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom I'm repulsive? And how am I repulsive? Its not like I think you're a terrible person just because you have different political views than me. Anyway, I got to your site, and immediately ruled it invalid with such statements like, "Most white liberals are very racist people who are responsible for the oppression of not only every race, but every class, sex and age group," and "One more for the idiots.. 'I want health care and need money for college. Go Obama!'"

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

uMMM, WHITE LIBERALS ARE RACIST, whether they know it or not is irrellevent. I have easily proved this. See more at TRACKRACISM ORG

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom Yeah, they want health care and an education. Is it WRONG that they want basic freedoms? Furthermore, your blog on single mothers is personally offensive because my mom is a single mother and is looking desperately for a job. Are you saying that, by not making her whole family homeless and receiving welfare and food stamps, she's a terrible liberal?

You aren't disgusting, but what you say is. Your blog is narrow-minded and rude. And that's that.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

You're narrowminded. And a douchebag. My blog is amazing and truthful. It offends you? You offend me and millions of Americans, including naive ones who were duped into voting for Barack Moron. Basic freedoms are healthcare and education? Nothings free you retard. I nor others should have to pay for YOUR healthcare. I shouldn't have to pay for high riskers' health care. GET YOUR OWN LOSER. As for your mom, she didnt do a good job preparing you for life. My SINGLE mother DID. Get lost loser.

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom So many insults, so little time. Your blog is disgusting, and I'm assuming your Christian, so it makes it more ironic since you're not displaying a very Christ-like attitude.

I'm not a "high-risker", and my mom did do a good job until her shitty company laid her off.

You offer nothing but hatred, so its kind of pointless to argue with you. At this point I just have to tell myself that I'm glad there will never be people like you in powerful positions in the near future.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

You assume I'm Christian? lol. Now I know you are dumb. IDIOTS like you that have been brainwashed to think that right wingers are all Christians. It's because you're a pussy, a little sheep. You can't think for yourself. Im not at all religious. I don't go to church. I don't have a bible. I believe in GOD, I don't have a gun. Your mom got laid off because she sucked at her job. I had over 60 jobs in 20 years, she2 lazy to get another one? Obama killed them all? make up your mind dickhead.

[quenwolf]

@IdiotsForObamaCom You believe in God. God with a capital "G" is the Christian god, so therefore you believe in Christianity's "absolute truth." And you know, its kind of cute of you to just make assumptions about my family. The recession that we're in started under George Bush, and either way you assume that I fully support Obama. If you're allowed to make assumptions, then so am I. Please, at least act like a respectful adult and keep the name-calling at a minimum.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

No- I don't have a religion but at least I KNOW America is a Christian nation. I'm not going to try and change or deny that fact you moron. As for your assumptions, wrong as usual. I despised George Bush but don't let the 2006 Pelosi congress and Bill Clintons policies with CRA-FannieFreddie get away with NOT fucking our economy up you douchebag. Go educate yourself. You dumb ass liberals are always blaming Bush for shit he didn't do, and not attacking him for shit he did do! GEORGE SOROS

[TheSqueezie]

@IdiotsForObamaCom You're right. Reagan was the one who is at fault for our current economic downturn.

[GuBB3rGuN]

The teaparty black guy doesn't know what socialism is. This video is stupid. You are all stupid. Fuck the tea party.

[chuska8383]

Poor fool. He has read Marx but is too economically illiterate to recognize the innate contradictions and fallacies in socialist dogma. He has drank the koolaid and is confused about the proper role of government, how economies grow, and doesn't even know the proper definition of rights! He is completely ignorant of enlightenment philosophy, world history, the implications of personal property rights, and social theory. What a twit.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 so why is socialism working for Britain? Holland? Denmark? It's just a style of completing the priorities you want to implement for your society. Capitalism has it's pros and cons just as every system Capitalism is experiencing stagnant wealth, and corporatism. No one likes your capitalist paradise either, where the most greedy can conspire to rule the resources of the masses who are not.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Incorrect and dishonest. Socialism is not "working" at all. It is lowering the standard of living of those countries. It is rapidly de-industrializing what used to be the most industrialized of countries. Socialism is the advocacy of violence in order to solve social problems by following a set agenda by morally and philosophically dishonest people. Capitalism, pure capitalism, has no cons. The stagnant wealth is because of socialism in the West - you've got it backwards.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 Pure capitalism has no cons? So you think there is no market manipulation? Off hour trading? Monopolies? oligopolies? Those are pitfalls of capitalism. Claiming that socialism advocated violence in order to solve social problems? Name some of those acts then , from a country like Holland, Denmark, or Britain. Dishonest people? Explain how socialism in the west caused stagnant wealth (we don't have pure socialism either in the west, similar to your pure capitalism remark)

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Market manipulation is illegal and fraudulent and has nothing to do with capitalism - that is criminal activity. If we went back to a limited government without all this statism then the corporations wouldn't be able to buy off these politicians because the politicians would have no power to offer. Capitalism is the Rule of Law, socialism is the Rule of Men. All socialist countries use violence. Person A is rich person B is poor. Gov't takes money from B gives to A. See?

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 market manipulation is illegal, but a weakness of capitalism that it is allowed to happen.If you have pure capitalism with no regulation there is no way to stop market manipulation. those same corporations that would have no incentive to buy a powerless politician also now have no organization that stand in their way from imposing their will whether good or bad, but with no consideration to the greater good, money will be our only focus. Perfect world for wealth mongers, not me tho

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Marxist fallacies. There are laws in capitalism and they are strictly enforced. In order for capitalism to function, there absolutely MUST be the Rule of Law where all men, no exception, are subject to them and ensures no rights are infringed upon, which includes protection against theft and fraud. This ties into my original criticism against the halfwits in the video: they don't know the proper role of government - only Marxist lies and half truths. Again, BOOKS.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 the books that lead you to what you believe you mean? You mean it wasn't being born into money that make you like capitalism? lol. Again books are as only good as the info in them. You keep saying, Books and then names of authors as if by reading them you become an authority. Whenever someone disagrees you will say "marxist" then tell me the reason I don't understand is because i haven't yet read a book you have. Capitalism has as many failures that socialism does. period.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Listen to yourself! I was NOT born into money and that is not why people advocate capitalism. Your mind's so warped you can't see the truth when it is staring you in the face. You accuse capitalism of deflection when socialists desperately try to explain away everything about every single socialist murder spree and genocide in the 20th century. You don't even know what capitalism is. Whether you've read Marx or not you use his arguments repeatedly. Give your mind a chance!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 ya I was making lite of your reasons. I wasn't being serious. I accuse You yourself of deflection, not capitalism. Like I said before capitalism is a tool , not an entity with a personality. Capitalism has caused many murders itself, and slavery, exploitation. Argentina? did capitalism fail them? Capitalism without regulation it obsolete.....

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 There is no such thing as capitalism w/o law. Using personal property as you want, freedom from seizure of property, equal protection from laws and opportunities...these are not "tools" but an enshrinement of the natural rights of man as defined in Enlightenment philosophy. Subjugation to an inherently authoritarian, unlimited, and subjective system that is responsible for more deaths than any other system in history IS a tool - for economic illiterates, tyrants, and megalomaniacs

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Freedom & liberty doesn't cause death and destruction, its frightening and sad that so many think that. If a worker chooses to take an job and accepts the risks and rewards and is killed while working that is a tragedy but is not the fault of capitalism. Neither is criminal activity the fault of capitalism. The failure of Argentina was due to politicized monetary policy and reckless government interference which wouldn't be possible with sound money. See Austrian economics.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 so sweat shops are a fair and moral part of capitalism? Every failure of capitalism that I cite to you, you reply with "it wasn't pure enough capitalism". Capitalism can create a social "fence" that is not easily crossed, the sweat shop for example. The people have to work hard for just enough to survive. Getting an education and going to college to pick yourself out of that is very difficult, now throw in a health problem, or another emergency. Now you have a class society

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Compared to what? When those who work in sweat shops go there on a voluntary basis its because that is the best society has to offer them. it is how industrialization starts. As the number of goods being produced increases, so too will the amount of savings and thus capital reinvestment, thereby increasing productive capacity per unit labor, wages, and standard of living in time. See 18th century England for a past example or China and India as modern examples. Read economics!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 so,I should always look at something else other then I have mentioned that you? How about we stay in the 21st century where banks transfers of millions of dollars and don't involve a stage coach. What about being born in the same town the "haymaker riots" took place. Where a large company owns the whole town and punishes workers by denying them sale of goods at a general store if you complain about the company. That can be pretty similar to sweat shop conditions. Read sociology.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Something just dawned on me - you're one of those hopeless anti-protesters on this video, aren't you? You don't know what you're talking about, you keep on retreating from any valid point made, you're economically illiterate, you are clueless about the natural rights of man, you don't know what the proper role of government is, you don't know the implications of personal property rights...you're just a confused medievalist who is drawn to the power of a gun to solve problems!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 label me whatever you need to, in order to dismiss what I have to say. Power of the gun? I don't know how your bringing that into it. Protest all you want, it's your right as a citizen. clueless to the natural rights of man? Lol your the one who thinks capitalism has no faults. Oh and anti-protesters are also protesters themselves. You have an excuse for every example of capitalism failing, but offer none of the same stretches to things your oppose.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 It is not a coincidence that as America became more statist and centralized with the Federal Reserve in 1913 we then had an economic boom in the 20s and the Great Depression in the 1930s. It is not a coincidence that as the state began to act more and more outside the bounds of the Constitution, taxes and regulations increased which made American (and European!) industry less competitive. In the 60's we passed the New Deal and in 1971 we closed the gold window. It is obvious!

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Also, the reason why our countries are still (albeit with a lot of debt and lower standard of living) functioning is because we are not purely socialist but keep some (not enough) market forces. Meanwhile, the Chinese who don't have any of the Soviet-style entitlements or any of the onerous taxes and regulations are now more free market capitalist than the US or the Eurozone. The result? We're stagnating and they're growing rapidly!

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 And the US is no longer a capitalist paradise and has not been more a hundred years yet you still label the system which is more socialist than the Communist Chinese system capitalist! Why? Because socialism can not win in open debate, in a free and incorrupt marketplace of ideas, either on moral, historical, or philosophical grounds. Socialism can only "win" by the forced default of infiltrating and destroying its competition while not taking any credit.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 The united states a capitalist paradise? I guess that was possible when the rest of the world recovered from world war II, and your thinking like an old high school quarterback that wants to relive his glory days. "Because socialism can not win in open debate" really? in this open debate your not really making any points, just claims, and labels so far. No reasons. Socialism and capitalism are tools. Faults can be attributed to those using them more so then the systems.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 By the time WW2 came around socialism and central banking had destroyed the world. The United States began to centralize power and went down the path of welfare statism which is a branch of socialism. The US was the closest to a pure free market capitalist society in the 1800's when we had the highest standard of living, the most industry, best quality, lowest prices, highest wages. Meanwhile the socialist countries committed genocide and experienced starvation and stagnation.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Capitalism has nothing to do with greed or conspiracies or extortion. It is the freedom to use your personal property as you see fit in a society free of violence and coercion. That's it! Everything that you THINK capitalism is is not capitalism. What you have been brought up to think capitalism is is actually fascism and welfare statism which has nothing to do with capitalism. I don't doubt your intentions as being good but you are completely and tragically wrong.

[Bigbird5553]

So the great depression was caused by socialism then? 90 percent of the wealth being controlled by the 2%. That isn't greed? Free of coercion? Well the supreme court ruled any organization is allowed to give funds with no limit to political races. So, free of coercion with capitalist system.... no. Capitalism is obsolete. Made for a time when we had sea voyages and letter writing. We will see physical currency made obsolete in our lifetime. No way to stop counterfeiters in present time

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Yes! The great depression was caused by artificially low interest rates set by politically influenced central bankers and yes, it is because of greed! That is why nobody should have control over the money supply and why fiat currencies have never worked all throughout history. In a socialist country, the cost of all this grandiose nonsense must be hidden by inflating the money supply. Capitalism is not obselete - we haven't tried it for a century! Gold hasn't failed, paper has!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 Capitalism in it's purest form is obsolete. I would make the comparison to the situation being similar to a computer, going out on to the internet without virus protection. When computer age was young... no one created viruses or malicious programs, no need for virus protection/regulation. The world we live in today though? If a large enough slice of population no longer want to participate in capitalism you will see it become obsolete very quick

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 That doesn't even make sense. Freedom and liberty aren't fads that go out of style after a century or two. Yearning to act as you see fit with what is rightfully yours doesn't go away. Coercion and violence will always be tools of evil. Socialism can only win when the flaws of socialism are labeled as "capitalism" while the countries that are currently labeled as "communist" are experiencing explosive economic growth from what is in reality capitalism. As I said before: BOOKS!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 Right, always deflection. Capitalism only can be fallible if it isn't capitalism! Freedom and liberty are not fads correct. Capitalism however, Is. It's just a system. If we all believed in a different word that was for a different form of government we would still be Americans. Would still have our traditions, and culture. It's ourselves that give us drive for freedom and liberty, not our tools to implement them.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Your logic is contradictory. There is no freedom, liberty, or rights in socialism. If you admit that freedom and liberty are not fads, then you must admit that capitalism also is not a fad. I agree with you in that if we were still a limited government, still a true Republic instead of a sad, bloated, SOCIALIST, welfare state with a fiat money supply, then we would still be the envy of the world.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 envy of the world?  When the rest of the world was in ruins from WWII and we were the only game in town? We don't have anything near a socialist welfare state. A true republic? when were we a TRUE republic ? give me that date when we were last a "true republic".

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Yes, we were the envy of the world. People came here in waves of millions looking for the opportunity and high wages and standards of living that free market capitalism provides. Even prior to the destruction that the socialist countries inflicted on each other during WW2 the USA had the highest growth rates and industrial output and trade surpluses and stores of gold and silver. We don't have a anything near a socialist welfare state? What are you smoking? December 23, 1913.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 are we Pure socialism though? to throw your "when we were pure capitalism" bullshit comment back at you? The problem is you have to reach back almost 100 years to make a point. If any historian goes back 100 years we could find multiple catastrophic failures of socialism and capitalism(great depression? which you will say happened because it wasn't ENOUGH capitalism, lol that's called denial). Millions moved across the world not just America at the time you cited.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 The best way to give people what they want at the lowest price with the highest quality is the free market, NOT by pointing a gun at someone's head. There are absolutely no catastrophic failures of capitalism - none. And, yes, the Great Depression was because of reckless monetary policy from central bankers and government planners. If you want to understand, study Austrian economics.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 ...and it is not deflection. As soon as you start putting in entitlements and a fiat money supply and spread the wealth nonsense with an income tax, you do NOT have capitalism, you have welfare statism. That is honest. It is your side of the argument, the Marxist ilk, that can only take shelter in the accomplishments of capitalism while deflecting all horribly obvious abysmmal and catastrophic failures of socialism in this century and the last.

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 well name some catastrophic failures in the past 40 years how about then? Spread the wealth mentality comes when wealth is used to build more wealth by simply having some to begin with. Not producing more, performing better, or being more clever. Spread the wealth mentality happens when 90% of the wealth is controlled by a narrow 4-5% of the population. If you want to live in a financial aristocracy, be my guest. Not me.

[chuska8383]

@Bigbird5553 Do yourself a favor and read books by the following people: von Mises, Hayek, Hazlitt, Paul, Schiff, Rothbard, Rockwell, Tocqueville, Monstesquieu, Locke, Hume, Smith, Rand. Take a break from the cynical German thinkers that have been polluting your mind and are responsible for the enslavement, murder, starvation, and impoverishment of hundreds of millions throughout the world. Give your brain a chance. Read books from the other side of the argument. Feed your brain!

[Bigbird5553]

@chuska8383 I could throw some book titles at you as well, but I wouldn't think I would be making a point like you seem to think you are. Polluting minds and enslavement? I will have to assume your bringing up topics in one of the authors you listed. Read about who the Boycotts were, from england, operating in Ireland. Then you will see what needs to be done to the financial aristocracy.

[d0861]

@Bigbird5553 I love how leftists always bring up how much money the wealthy make, and use the word "greed." It seems like envy is motivating you, instead of some kid of perverted social justice, where a government forcibly, FORCIBLY, removes property and re-allocates it where they deem fit.

[Bigbird5553]

@d0861 I don't care if you want to work hard and become wealthy, whatever you consider that to be. However generational wealth where someone simply inherits a title and then profits off of it to not have to work for an entire lifetime,, and their childrens lifetimes, no . You should listen to warren buffets (3rd richest man) words himself. His secretary pays 32% in taxes while he pays 17%. Just paying their fair share would be a start. "FORCIBLY". lol give it a rest.

[d0861]

@Bigbird5553 So you're saying that I'm right.You are envious of those who don't "work for an entire lifetime" to become rich. Is that it?

[Bigbird5553]

@d0861 No , creating a caste system I am against, and generational wealth is the mechanism in which it acts itself out. So NO, i'm not saying your right...

[d0861]

@Bigbird5553 You're not saying my right? Huh?... Hmm. So you don't think that people should be able to give their wealth to whomever they choose? What about wills? Should the government just come in when someone dies to liquidate their assets? I mean, of course, it will be with the intent to give it to those who they deem needy...

[Bigbird5553]

@d0861 no I think just paying a fair tax would be a start. The wealthy claim to pay MORE in taxes, but end up paying around 17-20% of their income. The median is 32% of a persons income. I think you should be able to pass down their wealth, but over a certain amount taxed. Anyone who has played the board game monopoly knows that once 1-2 players own 95% of the money and property that NO ONE wants to play. Same in capitalism.  It's for the safety of the system, not about 1-2 people.

[d0861]

@Bigbird5553 So let me just get this straight. You hate the wealthy because you are jealous of them owning Boardwalk and Park Place, and you want their money to be stolen by the government through various taxes for the sole purpose of making them less rich. Is that pretty much it?

[Bigbird5553]

@d0861 I didn't say I hated anyone, those are your words and give some insight into your mind. Nope again your missing the point. No comments on you paying the correct tax? I'm not jealous, I'm concerned that Generational wealth can become financial monarchies. The founding fathers didn't want it to be like that. It's not a sole purpose of making the wealthy less rich . It's to preserve the system in which made that wealth possible in the 1st place. say no to syagnant wealth manipulation

[d0861]

@Bigbird5553 My missing the point? I disagree. I think that the Founding Fathers would champion a free-market system without government regulation, without an income tax, and without entitlement programs. The "system in which made that wealth possible in the 1st place" is one of LESS government regulation, interference and taxes. I'm afraid that the government has more to do with the rise of corporatism than the free-market.

[Bigbird5553]

@d0861 explain why the tax rate has gone down for the wealthy then? From 90% on corporations to what currently? The founding fathers didn't want to be ruled by Monarchies, NOR financial monarchies. Healthcare isn't an entitlement program. that's a label applied by you to play politics. The rise of corporatism has more to do with the government? Wow the government is a all purpose scapegoat huh? Less regulation is what cause the economic collapse in the first place.

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

LOL

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

hmmm, do we have an angry queer with a beret and scarf who doesn't like his video being posted showing how dumb he is? OR do we have another really dumb fucking liberal on the comment boards.lol.

Idiots4Obama Com - come see just how dumb you really are...cmon now....hurry..