FOAB
2:42
Added: 4 years ago
From: moni123s
Views: 114,102
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (528)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WTH, we are not in cold war anymore, bitches

  • ur motherfuckers

  • Stop killing our planet, peace, please.

  • As i always say, there's no problem that cannot be resolved using explosives, if you can't is because you don't use enough.

  • take that MOAB!

  • check out "baker" the underwater nuclear detonation.

  • 0:31 (I translate for you) to keep it simple comrade, it huge fucking bomb that blow fuck out of anything. Cheers Russia from USA!

  • M.O.A.B MW2 Faill

  • why I never heard of this back in 2007?

  • so it's radius is 300m

    good, i won't be evaporated from my watch point when WW3 comes

  • drop this on USA.

  • @yosbertt fuck you you fucking FUCKFACE

  • not even close to the strongest bomb strongest bomb was the tsar bomb it was equivlent to 57million tons of tntshockwave was measured arond world 4 times michroom cloud was 64 miles high people 64 miles away were burned by it f.o.a.b is a firecracker compared to the tsar

  • @560pizza This is the strongest NON-nuclear bomb.

  • @JChenler Yeah you're right, but do you know which is stronger maybe?

  • @henkoChilzz Well Russia says its 4x the MOAB the americans say about 50% stronger from the observance. I think on this one id probably say that the americans are closer to the truth, however we cannot awnser the question. And if we did know the awnser i dont think wed be sitting in our chairs typing youtube comments right now...

  • @henkoChilzz Sorry for the bad english its a bit late.

    A fine day to you Sir.

  • @560pizza that is NUCLEAR this is NON nuclear D:

  • @IAmTrolololol oh fk thats non nuclear now im rlly scared of humanity now

  • drop this on Mecca

  • I'm the most powerful. End of story!

  • I wouldn't ever trust it to explode it wasn't made as well it's was cheaper made guaranteed I would use a Moab and trust it to go off when it should and it would do the same job

  • Thumbs up if you thing FOAB is way better than the MOAB

  • @TheRicknator It's 4 times better actually :P

  • CHUCK NORRIS FARTS

  • its funny how the MOAB is more powerful... i guess the Mother is more of a bitch than the Father AHAH

  • @Earitated07 The MOAB has a 500m blast radius and less than 30 tons of tnt in power. the FOAB has a 1km blast radius and more power than 40 tons of tnt.

  • @Earitated07 Actually, FOAB is 4 times more powerful than MOAB.

  • @Earitated07

    except the M.O.A.B isn't more powerful, BUT YEAH ALRIGHT BRO

  • All i have to say:

    Niko.. Let's go bowling

  • @daikis9 die.

  • Father of all Bombs?

  • The FOAB should be on MW 3

  • @MarcellusEstacardo shut up about your stupid Call of Duty games. The fact that kids your age don't even know half the shit they're saying is traced back to Call of Duty is astonishing.

  • Fpsrussia's next video...

  • @Anthonymw13

    hes not Russian tho

  • @Anthonymw13 go away

  • Comment removed

  • lol As useal Russia made more from less. :)

    Look in the d bar for explenation.

  • @TheBlackIdentety As usual? It's a completely different type of bomb. This is a vacuum bomb, MOAB isn't. You can't compare the two.

  • @ChAoS9779 How does that change that it makes a twice as large explosion out of a smaller amount of materials?

  • @TheBlackIdentety They're made to destroy different targets. you're not gonna drop a bunker buster on a tiny shack, are you? We could've just as easily made ours a vacuum bomb and it would've been larger.

    You also have to keep in mind how much the payload of the two is, not just the total weight.

  • @orkneymist hahahah unless we bomb it!

  • 44 tons of TNT = 0.044 kilotons = 0.000044 megatons. Considering that both US and Russia still own nuclear warheads with up to 15 megatons. I thinkt they're still a long shot from replacing nukes.

  • @CyclonicTuna023 true, but it's powerful enough, and it doesn't have any of the after effects like radiation. Just a lot of houses in need of redecoration.

  • MOAB has now been beaten by FOAB. US Military is now inventing a new bomb which is said to be 19x more powerful then the FOAB, it is called the MFOAB or Mother Fucker of All bombs.

  • Something about the russian language is just filled with power. It feels so... powerfull. I love it

  • its all about the filament

  • they blew this up on september 11 2007 they were just trying to be dicks i think..... btw its the 5 aniversary of the bomb in a few days lol

  • A nuke that weight is literally 1million times more powerful. That number is so impossible to fathom. Imagine a bomb weighing half a table spoon doing equivalent damage.

  • @colossalko then we will build kirov airships that are as big as a stadium

  • i thought these were banned fireworks like bottle rockets and m 80's!?!?

  • well you gotta admit, the American bomb looks better. :)

  • LOL! MOAB stands for Massive Ordinance Air Blast bomb AKA mother of all bombs

    FOAB stands for "hey world! Russia can still make big bombs too! we'll name it father of all bombs so it sounds way stronger then mother of all bombs because whole world know women are weak!!"

  • @asianiinvasion Thats incorrect. It was named FOAB by the media, it has no official name.

    The US bomb got called "mother of all bombs" by the media as well.

    By definition this bomb is ought to be more devastating since its a FAE. The MOAB on the other hand is pretty much a regular bomb loaded with the same mix as almost every other bomb in the US arsenal, its only ... well.. bigger. The practical use of either one is extremely limited.

  • @Buuub08 The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb (MOAB) "Wikipedia" and Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power (ATBIP). That's official name

  • @DionysusFTW Im well aware of that. Im also aware that it is loaded with a standard H6 mix, just as every other GPB in the US arsenal. H6, or a similar mix like tritonal, is thermobaric in its properties... technically.

  • 0:14 sounds like he got tired of talking

  • Still this bomb fails in comparison to the atomic bombs dropped on Japan which are still more than a thousand times as powerful.

  • @SupremeCommander360 yeah but thats not the point. They already have Nuclear warheads. The point is to make a bomb that is powerful without no Radiation that damage the world we fucking live in.

  • @SupremeCommander360 And the consequences as well. For 66 years USA remains the biggest arseholes genocidal douches in history by incinerating 200,000 civilians just because they could, and not to disrupt the Japanese war efforts. And the areas are still affected by those blasts. Plus the Russians have by far the most powerful hydrogen bomb as well. If they built a bomb capable to destroy the earth you would praise it wouldn't you?

  • @DionysusFTW what a good troll you are... I aplaud you.

  • @SupremeCommander360 Maybe in your opinion we shouldn't measure the power of bombs in tons and megatons, but in how many japs can it incinerate. Any alternative to nuclear bombs is welcomed (bombs to replace it, not chemical attacks and stuff like that)

  • Hmm, MOAB + FOAB = KOAB? (Kid of all bombs.... a firecracker?)

  • Did anyone notice that the bomb, the plan, and the explosion never appear in the same frame?

  • Best things to come from Russia: Vodka, space travel, and the FOAB.

  • Russians are the best in bomb production.

  • Russians really like to blow shit up. They've detonated the biggest nuclear bomb in history and they've detonated the biggest conventional explosive in history.

  • ahah enviormentally friendly bomb :).

  • 1:30 daisy cutter in vietnam?!!? :O?

  • WTF, anyone noticed The explosion at 1:30 is a clip from the BLU-82 Daisy Cutter video, and the plane/jet at 1:28, and explosion at 1:32 is from the MOAB video?

  • You'll notice they don't show the bomb exiting the bomber (they just cut away to a shot that looks like it was filmed from the bay of a cargo plane shortly after having pushed the thing out. Good old Russian technology.

  • MOAB is prettier though :P

  • dirka dirk dirka dirka dirk... I JUST WANT TO WATCH EXPLOSIONS

  • i cant believe i just realized this we finally have an F bomb

  • it Russian

  • spooley voolich neetchya da bliezntch spasiba divolnych.

    I don't know what I just said, but it sure sounds like Russian if you read it out loud.

  • Cold war is fucking sweet!!

  • This is just another thermobaric weapon (they've been around for decades) that the Russians claim is the most powerful. None of us can know if that's true but it's still a big fucking bomb.

  • moab and foab (mother of all bombs and father of all bombs [i know these aren't the right names :P]) had a baby named tsar and they lived happally ever after... exept the doctors that did broght tsar to our world... (dedede) WTF AAAAAAAAAAA UHAHAHAHAUHAHAHHAHA!!!!!

  • At least the russians know where to test their ordnance, not in a damn forrest.

  • @Tiny578

    The idea is to gain measurements on the weapons power, not many area's in the US that where previously built up that we can just drop bombs on. Russia is three times our size, meaning more land mass to test.

  • @Weps21 The desert?

  • @Tiny578

    Because creating glass really helps determine the destructive power of a weapon.

  • @Weps21 Creating glass?

  • @Tiny578

    facepalm.gif

  • moab and foab should make love not war

  • @jovicakluk bad idea O_O

  • how funny would it be if the FOAB and the MOAB were made in china

  • @flooglafish I know that China developping a 21 war head orbital missil bumb,

    they called it " Guarantee fear of war bomb for peace"

    Since only taking two of this to destroy a large country

  • @fdoca The russian R-36 is the most capable ICBM on the planet... the thing can loft like 10 MIRVs with 750 kt each, with up to 40 weighted re-entry vehicles to defeat ABM systems. If you disregard START and SALT, a single R-36 could take out every major city in America.

    Good thing we have a bunch of Ohio-class SSBNs to keep 'em scared, huh?

  • @PootStip

    I doubt the first concern of the Russian in a Nuclear attack is going to be our cities, too many first enchlon concerns like Cobra Dane, PAVE PAWS, our aging but working ABMWS net, hardened facilities from Cheyenne Mountain, Raven Rock, Mount Weather, USSTRATCOM, plus older facilities like Green Brier and Mount Pony, then all our infrastructure like TVA, the Ohio Corridor, New England Corridor, major facilities in the Gulf and Delta, ect... then all the Command bases, ect..

  • @flooglafish They will be explode on-board the air craft for sure !!!

  • @flooglafish We would know, because they wouldn't work...

  • @flooglafish they were not.

  • To avoid confusion, the FOAB is as powerful as a tactical nuke (you know, the mini kind fired from artillery). That's still pretty good, considering it's 4 times larger then the next biggest.

  • yeah, you do all know that the father and mother bit is just colloquialisation right? l

  • God why do the russians copy EVERY SINGLE THING THE U.S. MAKES!!!!!!!

  • @flamoclanlead And why did the U.S copy and steal everything from Nazi Germany? Btw, Russia only copies and improves.

  • @flamoclanlead You retard. Fuel-Air technology is 4 decades old. Russia is simply reviving old Soviet tech.

  • @flamoclanlead This is a thermobaric weapon.....Russia has had these types of Weapons for the past 4 decades......

  • @arun199113 someone just read at wikipedia. so now you're a real expert.

  • @mkwe So atleast read Wiki and comment u fag......did i even say that im a real expert ...... what a jerkoff

  • Sorry but that explosion was small and that was a closeup view.. No offense but I was expecting something spectacular..

  • @CptFilth

    Looks like it's a Tu-160 Blackjack, their biggest strategic bomber. No problem with the weight....it could transport far more.

  • i think the americans took the idea from the russians. Look, if i was creating the largest non-nuclear bomb of all time i would actually call it the father of all bombs wich the americans didnt't do. so why call your """" largest bomb""""" the mother of all bomb. Thats because they knew that the FOAB of russians was much powerful than their MOAB. Imagine if the americans had calld their bobm FOAB russians would have raise their middle finger and and rename their bomb GFOAB ""grand father""

  • @jeuxpclol101 You sound like you smoke a lot of weed.

  • @jeuxpclol101

    Because the use of a female pseudonym has been common place in the US military since it's inception. Hence why the Navy has referred to all it's vessels as "she's" and tanks and aircraft are named female names.

    Also, Russia is known as the "Motherland".

    Oh yeah, the MOAB was developed in 2003, the FOAB was developed in 2007.

  • remember that MOAB is guided

  • foab? that explosion was small as hell! unless the camera was like 100 miles away.

  • FOAB - Father of All bombs

    MOAB - Mother of all bombs

    *Russians said to Americnas* - Well if MOAB is mother of all bombs ..... then this is the father!

    That comment that Russians said made me smile , cuz i'm not american or british :)

  • Comment removed

  • i don't like this bomb. although it may be the largest non-nuclear bomb in the world, its still just a bomb. its not even flashy for godsake. what's the fun in having a bomb land near you and you not having the satisfaction of having your eyes burned out before you're disentgrated.

  • the most powerfull non-nuclear bomb on our planet..., with this kind of weapons, we can kick some alien asses (especialy with TSAR).

  • @vavra222 Tsar bomba is overkill, aliens eh i like the idea of kicking there ass

  • How did i know from the very second i clicked on this video that the comments would be filled with know it all twats that think there better than everyone else just because they can read a website about fucking bombs and then act all arrogant when they correct someone..... or worse yet.... make it sound like there special because they "know" the correct answer then make ppl feel fucking small just because they were modest about there knowledge.

  • hahaha i like the way the russian version of the moab is just an atom bomb with a bit of wood to make it pointy :))

  • i did some calculations.7,1tons/44 tons=0,16.so this bomb is 0,16 times creater than classic bomb.U.S.A has tested atimic bomb simulation.and this bomb TNT was 500

  • Cant wait till 4th of July ! XD

  • @necro2100 Arnie will be back!

  • @vavra222 hahaha!! right on time!

  • 8200 KG = 11 Tons and 7100KG = 44 Tons.... no wonder Russia is broke, their skill in math speaks for itself

  • @EvilZombieClown

    /facepalm

    "Ton" is also a measurement of explosive power.

    The Russian bomb weighs 7 tons, but it's EXPLOSIVE POWER equals that of 44 tons of TNT.

  • @EvilZombieClown Trinitrotoluene, bka TNT, is an explosive widely recognized as the standard for measuring explosive power. 44tonnes (1 tonnes not ton) of tnt means 44,000 KG of TNT. Meaning the 44 000kg of tnt would need to be used in order to equal this blast. In other words the bomb generates over 6 times the power of tnt weight-for-weight.

  • Ok, lets reflect:

    1 - Russians in a copy of the B-1 - but bigger

    2 - Russians, a copy of the Moab - but bigger

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Seems the Russians have Penis envy.

  • @skii6868 The T160 "blackjack" bomber went into service 6 years before the B1 bomber.

    Sux to be wrong.

  • @jimmywrangles

    Check your record books. From what you're saying, the U.S. Took the idea from Russia right?

  • Ok, lets reflect:

    1 - Russians in a copy of the B-1 - but bigger

    2 - Russians, a copy of the Moab - but bigger

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Seems the Russians have Penis envy.

  • Ok, lets reflect:

    1 - Russians in a copy of the B-1 - but bigger

    2 - Russians, a copy of the Moab - but bigger

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Seems the Russians have Penis envy.

  • Scary shit!

  • I'd rather have these than nuclear weapons.

    Would shit hit the fan, russians and americans would blow each other the hell up, us in the middle could possibly survive :P

  • I love the way the bomb bay doors of a Tupolev Tu-160 open and then you see the bomb obviously pulled off the back of a horizontal tail lift cargo plane, farcical to say the least.

  • i bet he was in Nam too and ate something with agent orange on it and came out ok from it, but then ur the one that got all the birth defects

  • ur dad works for the gov and he comes home and tells you what going on in military defence, i call bullshit

  • united states calls theirs the MOAB mother of all bombs, russia is calling theirs FOAB father of all bombs, these are non-nuclear, they are just equivalent to them in temp and power

  • MOAB stands for Massive Ordinance Air Blast.

  • @hawkdlb06 These bombs are by no means equal in power to nuclear bombs. This bomb has the same explosive yield as about 44 tons of TNT. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima's explosive yield is estimated to be in the rage of 13,000 to 18,000 tons of TNT - that's a HUGE difference. And that is even put into insignificance when compared to the Tsar Bomba, a soviet hydrogen bomb, that is equivalent to 50,000,000 tons of TNT.

  • When they're speaking Russian, it sounds like someone speaking English backwards.

  • US made a bomb 18 times stronger then a nuke shock wave can go around the world 13 times

  • 18 times stronger than what size nuke?

  • it can take out 3/4 of russa... they do not have a name for it yet

  • You didn't really answer my question....

    Anyways, where are you getting your information from?

  • my dad works for the gov and he told me it he is a high rank guy and not hte guy to lie ether

  • What branch does he work for, exactly?

  • The defance of the USA

  • What I'm wondering is that if the FOAB is so new, why does all the footage of it look like it was filmed in the 1960s?

    I know Russia is backwards and poor but this is ridiculous. It looks like cold war stock footage.

  • what for do i switch my lights of? Saving the the earth? These bombs (tests) are such a huge waste of CO2!

    Thats god damn shit man

  • You might enjoy this piece of information, I think it's funny. Meat production in the US causes more green house gases than petrolium consumption. You wanna save the planet? Get people to cut down on the Big Macs.

  • will be shot down before it touches even the ground

  • Differnce is MOAB and FOAB is this. FOAB is deployed by Tu-166 bomber as non-guided weapon. MOAB can be delivered by C-130/C-5 and B-52 and B-1, and can be guided by Infrared / GPS / and Laser. So the purpose and use would be very different. FOAB is more or less daisy cutter Area Clearance Ordinance (ACO) and MOAB would be for precision delivered ground buster.

  • I like the old way of things... Build the biggest and the best and keep competing for supremacy! Know one dared to mess with the U.S. or Russia during those days. Now look at the world, It was better before, because Mutual Assured Destruction ensured neither would strike first. Has that ever happened in the history of the world??

  • The FOAB is the largest non-nuclear explosive device to date. The MOAB is second to it, i don't know why people prefer MOABs over FOABs, because to be honest i think if i had the choice between a FOAB and a MOAB i would choose a FOAB. It is the more logical tactical choice, nationality has nothing to do with it, since this is only a tactical decision.

  • These two bombs are fucken tiny, TSAR was much more devestative.

  • That's because it was a nuclear bomb.

    We're talking about non-nuclear, non-radioactive weapons here. Oh, and dumbfuck, if you actually read the sixth word in my comment then you would understand that, wouldn't you? God, i bet you're like 9 or 10 or something.

  • No it wasn't The hiroshima bomb was nuclear, TSAR wasn't. These bombs are nothing, pointless. Unless you go nuclear you should go home.

    Nice name juju lipped boy

  • Look who's talking about names, ya little cuntface. By the way, hiroshima and TSAR were both nuclear. You've gotta be like 14 or something, god, what a fucktard, you dumb faggot. They were both nuclear-The FOAB is the largest non-nuclear device created. TSAR was nuclear, hiroshima was nuclear. The TSAR is the biggest nuclear device to date. You know, you probably have down syndrome. Now i know why your so stupid.

  • Your mum is nuclear, you little cum dripped douche bag. TSAR was non nuclear it was just tnt, hiroshima was just plutonium god you know nothing about anything do you.. shit your stupid. your probably 12 or somethung aye. and black too! just remember

    Everyone should stop being racist . . racism should be a crime, and crime is for NIGGERS!

  • go search on the net

    douscher

    TSAR was nuclear thats y dey din create very few of em

    cuz they din waanna nuclear fallout

  • dude, do a quick 10 second search on google and realize you're wrong so you'll quit embarrassing yourself! bahahahahaha god man i kinda feel bad for you because of how stupid you look now hahaha

  • @thegurutrader:

    The Tsar Bomba wasn't TNT you racist dipshit! It was 57 megatons TNT equivalent. You wouldn't measure the force of TNT in TNT *EQUIVALENT*. Look at all these people who know more than you, dumbass. As for the comment about x2yzh9's "mum", completely immature. You are definitely autistic.

  • Is it bigger then the MOAB? I think it was released before it..??

  • FOAB is stupid, MOAB is stupid, weapons are stupid. Senseless killing will always continue because humans are incapable of evolving past their primordial destructive instincts. Honestly, I hope we never become advanced enough to go past this solar system; this universe does not need further contamination of our inferior species.

  • Russia is always aping USA!!!!

  • :PPP

  • You can have your foab. I'll stick with a good old American weapons. It's what we do best. I know it will work when I need it. Who would trust Russian tech over American?

  • Comment removed

  • Hmm more trustworthy Russian tech?

    legunncat... its called the AK-47