Added: 3 years ago
From: CubeFish1524
Views: 88,377
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (158)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its like Tetris :D

  • My bump cube is realy loose even tho I havent used it THAT much.Does anyone have the same problem?

  • 87042nd VIEWER YAY!

  • you solved it like a 3x3 right?

  • Weird, watched this video exactly 3 years from its release

  • i can solve this blindfolded... heres the link youtube.com/watch?v=Di6k3pbQzp­Y

  • It's only an example solve if you talk about how you solve it lol. Fail.

  • crazy...

  • суппееерррр

    !!!

    

  • challenge denied

  • wtf???'

  • that would make anyone an einstein

  • I really want it for Christmas :/

  • I would drive over it then glue the pieces back how they should be. Seems like it would be a lot less drama to do it that way.

  • imagine if they made a pillowed mirror cube

  • amazing thing :O

  • why am i watching you do this?

  • my mind has been blown :troll:

  • goood video i coud kinda see how u solved it like a 3x3 rubiks cube:-D

  • this is the original rubik's ?

  • where did you even get that thing it's pretty cool

  • WTF???

  • if u put colored stickers on this it will be easier

  • That cube just seems like it would be too much of a cluster fuck for me to waste my time

  • lol u did the wrong G perm

  • @CubeFish1524 where did u get that cube?

  • to solve that its the same method for 3x3

  • must be easy to get lost as it doesnt has colors

  • one question. Is the algorithm sequences the same as a normal cube?

  • MIND FUCKED

  • we are aliens O>O

  • you solved it the same way as a normal rubic's cube

  • WHAT KIND OF SORCERY IS THIS?!

  • try the Fridric Method. I bet that would be hard, but improve your times.

  • taking off the stickers wont help here

  • this is so easy to solve. basically the depth defines the color! so you just start out with a cross thats flat and on the same plane and then its all the same from there!

  • NEED ONE NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!

  • wow do you solve this like a regular rubiks cube!? or are there different algorithms???

  • begginers method right i now the alg nice vid=))

  • DO WANT.

  • whats the price of that?

  • I WANT THT CUBE!

  • HA! you can see the camera man in the reflection of the cube!

  • how did u do that??

  • fscd

  • you have small hands!

  • there are parity errors in this cube? like in the 4x4x4, or the void cube?

  • i like the music REALLY i do

  • and i thought normal rubix cubes were confusing.

  • I ordered one 2 weeks ago and still has not came 

  • @HowOrigami how did you make that logo or whatever at the end?

  • That's what my next cube is gonna be. I seriously want that cube.

  • holy shit its the allspark transforming in to itself but smaller

  • you used dan browns method

  • @spammanism

    lol it's not his method

  • @cubefish1524 was it hard like making the change over between solving regular cube and mirror blocks

  • Cool, amazing cube. I like it. And you're very good at solving it.

  • it's like a bad joke. one understands it and the rest go "how did he get that?"

  • this is just like a normal kubiks cube. you can see how you use the same way of solving it

  • i'm totaly going to get one of these next. either that or a slim tower.

    What method do you use cuz it's definitley not the beginers method

  • i'm totaly going to get one of these next. either that or a slim tower.

  • Must be tough doing F2l on it, haha.

  • i guess that if you can figure out a way to link sizes to colo position, solving the cube wouldn't be as hard? or is it imposible to solve it like a regular cube?

  • @patrax123

    You can solve it the exact same way.

  • @CubeFish1524 if you can solve it the same way, is it actually not that difficult to solve?

  • @patrax123

    its the same solving method as a regular cube. the only difference is that it looks awesome

  • 1:17 I can see your lips^^

  • Comment removed

  • can u show us how to play that?

  • this is a large isnt it? not a standarD?

  • @wonderman234

    it's a standard sized cube. probably looks big cuz my hands are small =P

  • this song sounded like cannon in d at first. then it was weird.

  • @jumba6

    lol it does

  • are you a wizard?

  • Modern architecture...

  • I am guessing this is just like solving a standard 3x3x3 cube... the only hard part is that the colors are replaced with differend sized cubes.... probably very difficult to make a transition from colors to different sized shapes.

  • i can solve the megaminx and the normal 3x3, would i be able to solve this? im average at solving =o

  • where can i but this????

  • i want that rubiks cube

  • i cant even solve the 3x3x3 so i would never be able to solve this!!

  • it isnt that hard actually its really fun.

  • awesome i got one of those cubes from my cousin in taiwan... REALLY FUN to play with xD

  • awesome i got one of those cubes from my cousni in taiwan... REALLY FUN to play with xD

  • will it make it easier with colours? or just harder? XD

  • you have to try to solve it blindfolded its easier than you may think.

  • I got mine yesterday.. took me about 30 mins the first solve and it gave me  a headache. 15 mins on the second solve.... 10 mins the 3rd..

    By the 5th solve and on I was averaging 3 minutes. The hard part is not recognizing plls, but executing them when you are used to pull them from muscle memory.

  • if i had that i would turn it and not know if im doing good or bad O.o

  • hhaaha its so easy,,,

  • Mirror Blocks solve like rubiks cube :D

  • i can solve it too yeeeey :P

  • how do i do the last? u know, the nine last pieces.

  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but it solves the same as a 3x3? Are you using the beginner method?

  • WOW!!!!!

  • Can we name it as WTF Cube or WTF^3?

    Because

    first impression when you see it is WTF.

    Second impression when you shuffle it is WTF.

    Third impression when you try to solve it is WHAAAAAT THE FUUUUUUUUUUUU

    ?

  • @eifeks LOL

  • cant wait for mine to arrive!!!!

  • the only thing hard about this is keeping track of all the pieces otherwise its the same

  • Mine will be here in 10 days ;-)

  • It's awesome!!

    Uhh... can I know the tittle of the song? please... o.o

  • idk...i used audioswap because i had a runny nose and i kept on making a sniffling sound...xD

  • @CubeFish1524 Ahaha... ohkay then. Anyway, thanks for the video :D

  • I'm wondering whether or not to get this cube? For people who have it, can you give me suggestions? Is it challenging or impossible?

  • its not impossible, but a bit challenging. the easiest way is by solving the thinnest/thickest layer for the 1st layer. that boosted my time by approximately a minute

  • I can solve a regular 3x3x3 rubiks cube with ease. Im deciding whether or not to get the mirror block rubiks cube. For those who have it can u please leave suggestions? If this is not the right choice which rubiks cube is difficult and challenging that i would like other than the 3x3x3, 2x2x2, 4x4x4, 5x5x5, and the megaminx

  • @mmiddymaster27 its Teraminx, the bitchest rubik's thing i've ever done!

  • wow when I got it , it turned awesome! AND IT LOOKED AWESOME

  • I Need help is The Original Rubik's Cube and the Bump Cube the same algorithm wise?

  • yep

  • Whats the song?

  • it make me dizzy when i see it messed up

  • This is terrific to watch (and learn from).

    The camera work is just right, and the

    sound track works great for me.

  • can you help me with the last layer? i can solve a 3x3 with ease but i just dont understand how i do the last layer of a mirror blocks

  • what method do you use?

  • nvm i found out in some tutorial, and i use the same method as a 3x3, but thanks anyways

  • He is using the beginners Layer-by-Layer Method that is a derivative of the Jessica Freidrich-method, but much much simpler. It's amost impossible to solve this cube with the F2L-layer method due to the irregular geometry of the cube in its unsolved state.

  • its very confusing bec. of its sizes! rawr!

  • does the beginner's method of 3x3x3 works?

  • yep

  • hmm interesting way to do pachelbel canon at about 50 seconds :P

  • won't it be simpler if we paint each side with different colors like the regular 3x3 cube? then it won't be confusing!!!

    it's just that..... we will loose the sense of it all!!!

    hahaha... so it is still better to try and try until you DIE... i mean succeed!!!

  • That's the whole point of it, to be confusing.

  • the backround music almost sounds like canon rock.. :o

  • what music is this?

  • ive tried f2l there and it works... same principle 4 the 3x3...

  • Are those for sale in America?

  • no, but you can order online.

  • these are easy i got 2 of these today in the post and ive solved them like 50 times already if i were you i would start with the smallest or largest side it is simpler =]

  • cool i want one for christmas

  • if im able to solve a 3x3 would it be easy for me to solve this?

  • yep

  • yes same prinsiple

  • your awsome

  • can't you make one of these with a regular 3 by 3 rubiks cube? or at least something like it?

  • Yeah, I was just replying to ariacomfort's comment but ok. :D

  • Hey can someone help me... I tried solving this cube the same way I would solve my 3x3x3 Cube, but I got confused with the different shapes and ended up getting messed up... can anyone tell me if you can like dissassemble? Or can you find st on internet that solves it??

  • Hi! A great way to solve it without getting confused is by solving the thickest layer or thinest layer as the cross/first layer. Then F2L/ second layer will be MUCH easier! 3rd layer shouldn't be hard either. Don't take it apart and put it back together in the right positions. That's nooby.

  • hey tnx dude, I tried it again and actualy solved it. but took me some time thoe.. but still got it.

  • Accually, it is pretty hard to dissassemble. The shapes and centers are hard to Idenify. Just dont give up and keep trying to solve it. ;) Good luck!

  • I can solve a 3x3x3 rubik's cube but I think if I buy this, I might just keep it for my collection..

    Knew you were using the 3x3x3 method when you were solving the 2nd Layer...

  • who can solve a regular 3x3x3 can solve one of this using the same method?

  • Yes.

  • i can

  • yes

  • now u cant peel off the stickers and put them back in the correct place!!

  • and people thought the original rubiks cube looked complicated guess they never saw this coming hahaha

  • They look so much harder to solve...

  • maybe I buy one too, it looks like a fun puzzle.

  • yeah, its really fun to play with =)

  • that was fun to watch! :)

  • so you're using regular algorithms that you normally use on a 3x3?? interesting.

  • DUDE!! That thing is crazy!!!! wow that's the first time i've seen that before. what an interesting cube.

  • i want one of these so bad

    it looks like it'd be an interesting challenge :]

  • no its not

  • its the same solve as 3x3x3

  • ...

  • you solve it the same way as how you solve a 3x3x3. its just different shapes instead of stickers.

  • same solve as 3x3x3 ;)

  • how to you fix it

  • wow thats cool

  • nice vid and nice song

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more