the reason why theists ask atheists such questions is simply because atheists are the ONLY people who cannot answer the 'origin' of the Big Bang !?..how it even started and why?..why not happen again?..etc
Theists have a simple answer to that one (God did it) ...which also explains the miraclous formation of planets with "Gravity?", especially Earth having living creatures including Human beings with 5 senses alongwith intelligence and consciousness
Yeah, I wish you had found someone else's video to put your tired, incoherent rant on.
So to summarize, you wish Desertphile dead, and you are so proud that you have a simple answer to life, the universe and everything - "God did it". Then some rambling nonsense about your "senses".
Rebuttal:
The "village idiot" has a simple answer that makes his life SO happy too. He thinks he is the reincarnation of Elvis. Like you, he doesn't give a damn if this answer is true or not either.
@hwud1 cosmologists have their own theories that cannot be proved (yes, so can't the existence of God directly - otherwise He won't create the universe and us)
Scientists and Atheists rely on 'science' and 'nature' ...that "produced" or "evolved' complex living creatures that we see around us.... but can they even explain the existence of science and nature?
No, cosmologists do not waste time with theories that "cannot be proven". Theories determined to be "non falsifiable" are automatically suspect, as well as theories with circular logic. "The Big Bang" has EVIDENCE and is falsifiable.
Your last paragraph is a silly pseudo philisophical statement that I am not even going to get into to any degree. Do you doubt the existence of nature? What is there to explain about that existence?
Why did you ignore the request to provide evidence for your god?
You do realize that complaining about evolution, the "Big Bang", and abiogenesis does not strengthen any claims for the existence of a god. God hypotheses do not win out by default, no matter how lacking your understanding of these other explanations. You must still provide evidence for any positive claims of a god. The leading scientific theories have EVIDENCE.
lol.. I wish you had died in that oven !
the reason why theists ask atheists such questions is simply because atheists are the ONLY people who cannot answer the 'origin' of the Big Bang !?..how it even started and why?..why not happen again?..etc
Theists have a simple answer to that one (God did it) ...which also explains the miraclous formation of planets with "Gravity?", especially Earth having living creatures including Human beings with 5 senses alongwith intelligence and consciousness
hwud1 1 year ago
@hwud1
Yeah, I wish you had found someone else's video to put your tired, incoherent rant on.
So to summarize, you wish Desertphile dead, and you are so proud that you have a simple answer to life, the universe and everything - "God did it". Then some rambling nonsense about your "senses".
Rebuttal:
The "village idiot" has a simple answer that makes his life SO happy too. He thinks he is the reincarnation of Elvis. Like you, he doesn't give a damn if this answer is true or not either.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@hwud1 cosmologists have their own theories that cannot be proved (yes, so can't the existence of God directly - otherwise He won't create the universe and us)
Scientists and Atheists rely on 'science' and 'nature' ...that "produced" or "evolved' complex living creatures that we see around us.... but can they even explain the existence of science and nature?
hwud1 1 year ago
@hwud1
No, cosmologists do not waste time with theories that "cannot be proven". Theories determined to be "non falsifiable" are automatically suspect, as well as theories with circular logic. "The Big Bang" has EVIDENCE and is falsifiable.
Your last paragraph is a silly pseudo philisophical statement that I am not even going to get into to any degree. Do you doubt the existence of nature? What is there to explain about that existence?
How about providing proof of your god instead?
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld oops.. I meant, "origin" of the existence of science and nature
did the Big Bang also create 'nature' ? (if so, how??... its just a phenomenon)
if not, then how are things automatically evolving since then? ..till now (or maybe it has stopped, since we don't see half-ape-half-human anymore)
hwud1 1 year ago
@hwud1
"Did the Big Bang create nature?"
Yes, it did.
"How?"
Go read about the theory. What am I, your personal encyclopedia? You want to know about it, look it up.
"How are things automatically evolving since then?"
Add "The Theory of Evolution" to your reading list.
"... or maybe it's stopped, since we don't see half-ape-half-human anymore?"
Assuming "it" is evolution, no, it has not "stopped". There is no way to "stop" it. There are ways to "affect" it, but not stop it.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@hwud1
Attempt #2 to knip the consternation in the bud:
Why did you ignore the request to provide evidence for your god?
You do realize that complaining about evolution, the "Big Bang", and abiogenesis does not strengthen any claims for the existence of a god. God hypotheses do not win out by default, no matter how lacking your understanding of these other explanations. You must still provide evidence for any positive claims of a god. The leading scientific theories have EVIDENCE.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago