@taiddan How did you come to this conclusion? Oh, right, the government told you. How do we determine "taiddan" is a moron? He bought the government story.
How did I come to this conclusion? Because you'd have to be a fucking moron to think that a workforce of over 100 people can conduct fairly major construction in two of the largest buildings in the world, with roughly 50,000 people working in them each day, completely unnoticed. How do explosives, EXPLOSIVES for god's sake, sit idly in a fire for 2 hours (7 hours for WTC7) and not have the wires, caps and triggers be destroyed?
@taiddan So you are an explosives expert? Well then, you should be a suspect. Cleaning crews work relatively anonymously and relatively alone. How did the WTC '93 bombers slip those explosives in unnoticed? How did the OKC bomber get all those explosives in unnoticed? If it is on tv, taiddan believes it.
LMFAO!!!! You couldn't have come up with any worse examples. lol! How did the '93 bombers slip those explosives in? How did the OKC bomber get his explosives in? They were VEHICLE BORNE explosives dumb ass! I'm pretty sure people would notice CARS and fucking TRUCKS parked IN THE HALLWAYS or INSIDE OFFICES of the WTC. Get a fucking clue you moron.
LMFAO!!! The people worked in the towers hours 24 hours a day, working day and graveyard shifts, you fucking moron. lol! Seriously, how fucking stupid are you?
Trust me, there's no doubt in my mind who it sucks to be right now. Get much sleep at night, thinking that the boogey man lives under your bed? Like I said in my original post- fucking moron!
@taiddan you are such a stupid fuck. You are intellectually lazy, so you turn on the tv to learn what to think, then you pop your processed food in the microwave. You are what is wrong with the world. What a stupid fucking asshole. Eat shit like the useless shrew you are, bitch.
@taiddan you'll come back with "security, blah, blah, blah". How do prisoners get drugs? taiddan believes what he sees on tv, and only what he sees on tv. Sucks to be you.
You idiot i don't care how much you know about engineering the tower did not explode it collapsed... those small ejections of material could have been anything BUT explosives... if there were explosives involved we would have found out... unless the technology you speek of is AN INVISIBLE TERRORIST. YOU IDIOT THE TOWER COLLAPSED FROM MELTING OF STEEL AND OTHER MATERIALS THAT LED TO MASSIVE STRUCTURAL MALFUNCTION THERE WAS NO EXPLOSIVES INVOLVED FAGGOT IF YOU WANNA MAKE UP STUFF GO BACK TO SCHOOL
An innacurate statement in this video "concrete is being forcefully ejected from the building already pulverised to dust". LOOK AGAIN. It is not 'already' pulverised to dust. Huge chunks of building (all materials from steel to concrete & furniture) are 'TURNING INTO' dust as they fall. Explosions cannot do this. If it were not for this anomaly, then indeed this video would appear to show explosions running down the tower as in top down demolition. But debris turning into dust as it falls???
So you love arrogance? Check the decieving and un-scientific NIST Reports and the ommittings from spokesmen such as John Gross and Shyam Sunder. You'll see arrogance.
It's worth noting that the "government" is not what we think of. Corporate lobbyists write the bills the corporate representatives present and vote into law. George Bush and Dick Cheney were figureheads for the oil lobby that was running the government in 2001; corporate;leaning Supreme Court justices decided that the votes in Florida should NOT BE COUNTED
@Ngaroc Thus putting George W Bush into office. "Follow the money" is the mantra of crime investigators everywhere. When you follow the money that followed 911, it's not hard to see that oil lobbies and military industry benefited most from the tragedy. Wake up!
why does the majority of the public still believes that the towers PULVARIZED, because of a couple of small fires? why has the debri been shipped out of the USA so quickly without forensic research? This STINKS. Another false flag of the USA. The NEW Pearl Harbour the neo-cons talked about less than 1 year before this happened. WAKE UP people and ask for a new and better research of how the towers fell.
I just saw a group of workers removing the top 2" of concrete from a road service on the US 40 highway bridge near here. Eight men with jackhammers were working an an area about 16 x 30 feet.
Concrete is very strong.
It does not act like a sack of flour when dropped.
In this video, the WTC floors, some 100 acres of concrete slab per building, reinforced with steel bars, are one by one turning to dust and being blown horizontally.
Chandler does not seem to realize is that had the WTC been stuffed full of explosives as he claims. For one thing the only thing capable of slicing huge steel columns is high explosive linear shaped charge. Explosives remove the resistance a building experiences when collapsing. There would be no need or reason for material to be hurled 3 blocks. Every lower floor is intact until the upper portion lands on it. Watch Landmark Implosion and notice how the ENTIRE building drops DOWN not out.
@roquefortfiles You mean like Building 7? How arrogant are we to believe we are aware of the all the advanced technology that the perpetraitors here have access to. Do you think this was planned to look like a conventional implosion? ... such as Building 7 WAS! Does this here really look like a gravitational collapse to you? Where did the 47 MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS disapper to? Seriously? Fuck man, wake up :(
@luvmyctd Yeah? Show me one piece of anything connected to a CD. Hundreds of trained people were on every pile. Not one shred of anything was found. Not a blasting cap, not a piece of wiring, a fuse element. I don't know if you know too much about this stuff but after a CD material liters the area. There is so much of it it has to be cleaned up (I am not talking building I am talking explosives material).
" Show me one piece of anything connected to a CD. "
Well...
- The powderizing
- The blasts and squibs
- That every carrying element was removed to make the buildings come down in near free fall
- The "in their own footprint" alignment
- The bomb like explosions that 118+ forst responders reported
- The event itself
What secret Black Op tech was used was removed too swiftly to be noticed by "hundreds" who didn't know what to look for anyway. That's why we need a new inv.
Cameras recorded excactly what Chandler explains in the video above - which has nothing to do with a "natural, fire enduced collapse."
HOW the cd's worked is for a new investigation to figure out. So far, the NIST Report is Rockefeller-bribed, un-scientific junk that does not explain the so far unexplainable phenomenons that goes on during the collapses, and everything points to SOME sort of cd's.
That's just reality. Reality is always happening, dude.
You don't know if there was "zero debris" in the pile. You BELIEVE religiously that there wasn't - and you fear the investigation that would finally show and explain what caused what I just listed plus e.g. the eutectic steel. You don't really wanna KNOW, do you?
@Thetan1974 I am about as un religious as one can be. So no!! I don't believe RELIGIOUSLY!!.
There were hundreds of trained people in CD at all three sites. No one found a thing. Which makes the CD statement all the MORE ridiculous. 30 year professionals and these people suddenly have no clue what a CD looks like? Hardly!!
You don't know what you are talking about. I can tell you that your not going to have pro news cameras 800 feet away record nothing (ABC NEWS?).
People who believe blindly in the unproven fairy tale about "Osama & hos 19 Lil Hijackers" aren't different from religious poeple back in tie who believed what they were spoon fed from their church leaders - the one abouit the Flat earth with heaven above and hell below - WITHOUT sailing out to the abyss to check it out, is the most notable one.
We haven't had "100s of trained poeple" to do a proper investigation that complies with the rules of investigating a fire accident.
What do you mean "recording nothing"? They recorded what plenty of brave firemen, policemen and other first responders call controlled demolitions. HOW these were done is for a new investigation to find out.
You even spending time on truthers - making you look like a person obsessed with poeple believing in God or Santa telling them not to believe in these things - only exposes your fear of the truth and a real investigation. Nothing more, nothing less.
You know that Danny Jewenko had "a clue" about what a cd looks like. It would be interesting to see what he would have had to say about WTC 1 and 2 BEFORE being spoon fed the "natural fire enduced collapse" fairy tale "theory."
Has anyone wondered how it could be that the names of Jones,Gage,&Reynolds, have not only been mentioned on mainstream media, but their theory mentioned also?We all know the media is not free anymore,& nothing "airs" without 'higher ups' approval.The fact that both have occurred should speak VOLUMES!Please check out this video where Gage is "exposed"& watch his responses, it is very telling!>>>>
Assistance (explosives) was needed to destroy WTC1&2, not to mention 7WTC. Plus they cracked the"tub" (foundation) that always supported those buildings. Think about the dust and girders being ejected, a still photo was analyzed and showed at least 30-35% of weight is represented. To believe NIST, "collapse" occurs as buildings get lighter and lighter, as more&more debris is ejected, ur dumb as box of rocks. MICC did "shock&awe" on U.S. to "Oswald"(LeeHarvey) OBL as "badguy" in TWoT. Cheers suck
I see a building being blown to smithereens from top to bottom along w/everything inside. The Bozos at NIST should be TARRED&FEATHERED for their disrespect of those that died that day. Shame on America, u deserve what u get when God comes. Engineering common sense says any "collapse" could NOT extend below points of impact. Floors below were intact&unaffected by whatever platform was introduced into WTC1&2 u silly bastards. Initiation,"collapse," and destruction to below street level had assit
Thanks for the post. If this were control demolition or some sort of particle weapon, then that would leave serious problem problems with the design and the execution of the design of the building. It would have to mean that steel, the steel connections, and concrete were underperforming. Even you used a low PSI concrete, it doesn't turn to powder. The same is true with steel, plastic, human bodies, black-boxes, jet engines, etc.
@tiatdivad Looking at this video of the collapse, I can't see the enormous weight above the floors that would cause them to crash into one another. All I can see is a huge cloud of dust at the point where the collapse is taking place. Surely there would have to be a significant portion of intact building falling onto each floor to cause them to collapse in the way we are supposed to believe. And where are the support columns?
9 11 was an inside job...get wit it people,its just another example of a false flag operation..isreali mossad may have been implicated with this orcastrated attack but who knows...go to ground zero on 9 11 and demand a new investigation.ill be there, see ya there..9 11 was an INSIDE JOB
what happend to building 7 then it was on bbc news saying that it fell down when it was obviously in the background when the reporter was speaking whats wrong did one of the planes not go acording to plan did on of the remotes not work was flight 93 meant to hit building 7
It was clearly planes that knocked over the 3 buildings... I dont know what you guys are thinking! I see no explosions but air being forced out of the bottom floors from the pressure build up...
@GovCreatesAccounts I just don't see it either....sure I see the "jets", but thats because of the 20 floor piece of the bldg collapsing downward, and look at the external box "Y" shaped columns peeling away, mushrooming like a bullet jacket.....doesn't look like any controlled demo I've seen....never seen a bldg that tall CD'd from the top down
It was a nuclear demolition watch Dimitri Khalezovs Presentation it covers everything top to bottom explains everything in detail. these towers were pulverized into dust as this video shows. It would be impossible for nano-thermite to turn turn steel into dust. there were 1400 cars toasted over the blocks around the towers what can do that? DIMITRI KHALEZOV please watch his presentation and interviews
@pt1gard Unfortunately gullible minds are immune to facts. There is even an interview with an ex KGB guy who was involved in brainwashing studies and he said "A mind that has been compromised by demoralisation, propaganda and other brainwashing techniques will not believe the truth even if you show them all the evidence, video's, pictures etc..."
@galaxything .. good pts my friend, i read where 20% can be easily hypnotized, 60% on fence, and 20% cant be .... i would like to see those 20 tough ones do a little research, a lot of YT people know whats up, but in public i dont see it
has anyone done the math here? how much explosives would it take to pulverize the concrete like this does? it is turning do dust as it falls. is it still under the influence of the explosives at that time? why/how is it still coming apart?
Check out the below video, (link provided). There are secondary explosions occurring as the debris is falling to the ground...and these can be visually seen with observation of the frames which include backdrop against the sky.
I have just added several video links to the description of this video... things posted since this video was placed.
@onepercentor 9/11 researcher Dr. Steven E. Jones, in "Revisiting 9/11/2001 – Applying the Scientific Method," discusses the tiny iron-rich spheres, (residue of reacted thermite), which are in the dust from the WTC.
Based on the mass of these iron-rich spheres found in a sample of the dust, Jones estimates (roughly) that about .04 percent of the dust was "iron-rich spherule," which would be "of the order of ten tons." This provides an idea of how much thermite was in the WTC towers.
@ricthuse I've worked in engineering and have seen thermite used to cut steel. You'd need a damn sight more than ten tons to bring down the WTC.
Dr Jones' samples were taken from the site after clearance had started. We know that thermite was used in the clear-up operation, as the most basic research would show.
@ricthuse I'd think twice about quoting anything said or written by Dr Jones, as he's a mormon nut job, who also believes, amongst other weird stuff, that Jesus Christ visited the Americas. Hardly the most credible scientist out there, is he?
@onepercentor 1500 lbs of semtext in the basement of the North Tower back in 1993 failed to bring it down. It takes weeks of work to wire a building like this for demolition. It couldn't be done secretly
@DaMuttzNutz There was a 9 month long elevator renovation going on allowing access to the core columns of the towers. I agree its a big job, but there is no doubt, explosives must have been used.
@GlobalSatori we'd have heard the explosives going off. The noise made would have been deafening...unless you know of a way to release all that energy without making any noise.
@DaMuttzNutz There were over 300 reports by firemen in the official oral history records detailing multiple explosions going off. The federal government had this information blocked and it was only revealed after they were taken to court under freedom of information. None of this evidence was included in the 9/11 Commission report and firemen had to sign a gagging order to receive compensation. Plus thermite type explosives are less noisy.
@onepercentor can you elaborate (explain ) further on your point?"it is turning to dust as it falls" are you saying some thing in line of what Judy Wood was saying, that there was some high energy weapon?
@onepercentor yes, it would take way more energy than is available for the collapse. In this collapse all the energy would have to be used to deliver the material to the ground. There is no left over energy for pulverization.
@flanksteak2 Without vertical support? Wtf, so the 47 MASSIVE interior vertical columns just magically disappeared? Gravity my ASS! Forget where this was or why you believe it happened for a second ... DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE? C'mon ... what do you see? Pretend that AlQaeda tried to convince you of this INSTEAD of the US govt. Would you still believe it? No, I thought not.
@flanksteak2 ANYBODY that watches this video (even without understanding the other mountain of evidence proving this was an inside job) and still believes this a GRAVITATIONAL collapse because of a jet fuel fire near the top floors is completely braindead. What the fuck is wrong with you? Millions of people have been murdered because of this lie and millions more will die unless arrogant clowns like you can pull your head out of your ass. So many good people dead yet you still waste oxygen. Fuck
@luvmyctd I totally agree. These people are really dishonoring the victims by forgetting and blaming other nations without evidence. I don't understand how they can have the time to write nonsense comments but not even have watched or read one page about the facts from independent sources. Why would one believe the gov and mainstream media more than architects & engineers, pilots, scientists, demolition experts, military officers, neutral thinking first eye-witnesses, etc. ?
They did it. People within our own government. For power, and war profits, and control.
Tell others.
The revolution will not be in the streets, but in the hearts and minds of the American people.
Once you KNOW, you will never be there fool or tool again.
Death to the people who did this, and to those who aided & abeted in it, by withholding information on this crime. These people in the gov, need to know that "just doing my job" ain't going to cut it anymore than Hitler's guys @Nuremberg
In John Farmers new book In John Farmers book: The Ground Truth: The Story Behind Americas Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue, and I agree.
Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.
The Manhattan Project was kept utterly silent. Just sayin'.........
MeInTheCornfield 5 days ago
Who let the muslims into the buildings to rig the explosives?
It was muslims who did 9/11, wasn't it?
How did muslims enlist mass media in parroting the official lies of 9/11?
ReDiscover911(dot)com
whole2th 1 week ago
If there's one thing we've gained from 911, it's that we can single out a complete fucking moron with one question:
"Was 911 an inside job?"
"Yes!" - Fucking Moron
taiddan 1 week ago
@taiddan How did you come to this conclusion? Oh, right, the government told you. How do we determine "taiddan" is a moron? He bought the government story.
toddrandall68 6 days ago
@toddrandall68
"How did you come to this conclusion?"
How did I come to this conclusion? Because you'd have to be a fucking moron to think that a workforce of over 100 people can conduct fairly major construction in two of the largest buildings in the world, with roughly 50,000 people working in them each day, completely unnoticed. How do explosives, EXPLOSIVES for god's sake, sit idly in a fire for 2 hours (7 hours for WTC7) and not have the wires, caps and triggers be destroyed?
taiddan 5 days ago
@taiddan So you are an explosives expert? Well then, you should be a suspect. Cleaning crews work relatively anonymously and relatively alone. How did the WTC '93 bombers slip those explosives in unnoticed? How did the OKC bomber get all those explosives in unnoticed? If it is on tv, taiddan believes it.
toddrandall68 5 days ago
@toddrandall68
LMFAO!!!! You couldn't have come up with any worse examples. lol! How did the '93 bombers slip those explosives in? How did the OKC bomber get his explosives in? They were VEHICLE BORNE explosives dumb ass! I'm pretty sure people would notice CARS and fucking TRUCKS parked IN THE HALLWAYS or INSIDE OFFICES of the WTC. Get a fucking clue you moron.
taiddan 5 days ago
@taiddan Hey dumbshit, who's going to notice cleaning crews working at 3 AM? Get a clue, douchebag!
toddrandall68 5 days ago
@toddrandall68
LMFAO!!! The people worked in the towers hours 24 hours a day, working day and graveyard shifts, you fucking moron. lol! Seriously, how fucking stupid are you?
Trust me, there's no doubt in my mind who it sucks to be right now. Get much sleep at night, thinking that the boogey man lives under your bed? Like I said in my original post- fucking moron!
taiddan 5 days ago
@taiddan you are such a stupid fuck. You are intellectually lazy, so you turn on the tv to learn what to think, then you pop your processed food in the microwave. You are what is wrong with the world. What a stupid fucking asshole. Eat shit like the useless shrew you are, bitch.
toddrandall68 5 days ago
@toddrandall68
Get an education, it couldn't hurt.
taiddan 4 days ago
@taiddan You think this little pygmy is funny. Case closed.
toddrandall68 3 days ago
@taiddan you'll come back with "security, blah, blah, blah". How do prisoners get drugs? taiddan believes what he sees on tv, and only what he sees on tv. Sucks to be you.
toddrandall68 5 days ago
So nice to be in the conspiracy religion.
Join the club and pray 5 x a day to the holy chemtrail.
koertje 1 month ago
You idiot i don't care how much you know about engineering the tower did not explode it collapsed... those small ejections of material could have been anything BUT explosives... if there were explosives involved we would have found out... unless the technology you speek of is AN INVISIBLE TERRORIST. YOU IDIOT THE TOWER COLLAPSED FROM MELTING OF STEEL AND OTHER MATERIALS THAT LED TO MASSIVE STRUCTURAL MALFUNCTION THERE WAS NO EXPLOSIVES INVOLVED FAGGOT IF YOU WANNA MAKE UP STUFF GO BACK TO SCHOOL
Mrmoveit1995 1 month ago
@Mrmoveit1995 "if there were explosives involved we would have found out" You didn't find out.. how do you explain that?
GunClingingPalin 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An innacurate statement in this video "concrete is being forcefully ejected from the building already pulverised to dust". LOOK AGAIN. It is not 'already' pulverised to dust. Huge chunks of building (all materials from steel to concrete & furniture) are 'TURNING INTO' dust as they fall. Explosions cannot do this. If it were not for this anomaly, then indeed this video would appear to show explosions running down the tower as in top down demolition. But debris turning into dust as it falls???
feelthewyrd 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I enjoy watching armchair experts give their in depth analysis of what happened that day. Truthers are so arrogant .
Physman2011 4 months ago
@Physman2011
So you love arrogance? Check the decieving and un-scientific NIST Reports and the ommittings from spokesmen such as John Gross and Shyam Sunder. You'll see arrogance.
Thetan1974 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
for anyone who claims controlled demolitions always starts from the base:
watch?v=2NZtBL1PjMk
bernuga 4 months ago
I see floors collapsing inside, bringing the whole shit design building down. God I'm so brainwashed.
1971SuperLead 4 months ago
It's worth noting that the "government" is not what we think of. Corporate lobbyists write the bills the corporate representatives present and vote into law. George Bush and Dick Cheney were figureheads for the oil lobby that was running the government in 2001; corporate;leaning Supreme Court justices decided that the votes in Florida should NOT BE COUNTED
Ngaroc 5 months ago
@Ngaroc Thus putting George W Bush into office. "Follow the money" is the mantra of crime investigators everywhere. When you follow the money that followed 911, it's not hard to see that oil lobbies and military industry benefited most from the tragedy. Wake up!
Ngaroc 5 months ago
The building fell straight down, there were no explosives.
xCuppyCakeSqueakersx 5 months ago
@xCuppyCakeSqueakersx What a paradox. Forget the massive asymmetrical damage...Forget the ejections... I know, it sucks to live in denial.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
no1 belives the official reports.
shills working double shifts these days.
xNAJAFx 5 months ago
why does the majority of the public still believes that the towers PULVARIZED, because of a couple of small fires? why has the debri been shipped out of the USA so quickly without forensic research? This STINKS. Another false flag of the USA. The NEW Pearl Harbour the neo-cons talked about less than 1 year before this happened. WAKE UP people and ask for a new and better research of how the towers fell.
shanna1950 6 months ago
I just saw a group of workers removing the top 2" of concrete from a road service on the US 40 highway bridge near here. Eight men with jackhammers were working an an area about 16 x 30 feet.
Concrete is very strong.
It does not act like a sack of flour when dropped.
In this video, the WTC floors, some 100 acres of concrete slab per building, reinforced with steel bars, are one by one turning to dust and being blown horizontally.
Gravity can't do that. Explosives can.
Dulcimerea 6 months ago
Any thoughts I had of a conspiracy, are now fully disproven thanks to this brain dead video. This vid is laughable!
hoguff 7 months ago
Chandler does not seem to realize is that had the WTC been stuffed full of explosives as he claims. For one thing the only thing capable of slicing huge steel columns is high explosive linear shaped charge. Explosives remove the resistance a building experiences when collapsing. There would be no need or reason for material to be hurled 3 blocks. Every lower floor is intact until the upper portion lands on it. Watch Landmark Implosion and notice how the ENTIRE building drops DOWN not out.
roquefortfiles 9 months ago
@roquefortfiles You mean like Building 7? How arrogant are we to believe we are aware of the all the advanced technology that the perpetraitors here have access to. Do you think this was planned to look like a conventional implosion? ... such as Building 7 WAS! Does this here really look like a gravitational collapse to you? Where did the 47 MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS disapper to? Seriously? Fuck man, wake up :(
luvmyctd 8 months ago 15
@luvmyctd Yeah? Show me one piece of anything connected to a CD. Hundreds of trained people were on every pile. Not one shred of anything was found. Not a blasting cap, not a piece of wiring, a fuse element. I don't know if you know too much about this stuff but after a CD material liters the area. There is so much of it it has to be cleaned up (I am not talking building I am talking explosives material).
Absolutely ZERO of that was even seen or found.
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
@roquefortfiles
" Show me one piece of anything connected to a CD. "
Well...
- The powderizing
- The blasts and squibs
- That every carrying element was removed to make the buildings come down in near free fall
- The "in their own footprint" alignment
- The bomb like explosions that 118+ forst responders reported
- The event itself
What secret Black Op tech was used was removed too swiftly to be noticed by "hundreds" who didn't know what to look for anyway. That's why we need a new inv.
Thetan1974 7 months ago
@Thetan1974 And zero debris in the pile? Trained people at all three sites. Camera's 800 feet away recording nothing?
Ain't happening dude!!.
roquefortfiles 6 months ago
@roquefortfiles
Cameras recorded excactly what Chandler explains in the video above - which has nothing to do with a "natural, fire enduced collapse."
HOW the cd's worked is for a new investigation to figure out. So far, the NIST Report is Rockefeller-bribed, un-scientific junk that does not explain the so far unexplainable phenomenons that goes on during the collapses, and everything points to SOME sort of cd's.
That's just reality. Reality is always happening, dude.
Thetan1974 6 months ago
"And zero debris in the pile?"
You don't know if there was "zero debris" in the pile. You BELIEVE religiously that there wasn't - and you fear the investigation that would finally show and explain what caused what I just listed plus e.g. the eutectic steel. You don't really wanna KNOW, do you?
Thetan1974 6 months ago
@Thetan1974 I am about as un religious as one can be. So no!! I don't believe RELIGIOUSLY!!.
There were hundreds of trained people in CD at all three sites. No one found a thing. Which makes the CD statement all the MORE ridiculous. 30 year professionals and these people suddenly have no clue what a CD looks like? Hardly!!
You don't know what you are talking about. I can tell you that your not going to have pro news cameras 800 feet away record nothing (ABC NEWS?).
Absurd!!
roquefortfiles 6 months ago
@roquefortfiles
People who believe blindly in the unproven fairy tale about "Osama & hos 19 Lil Hijackers" aren't different from religious poeple back in tie who believed what they were spoon fed from their church leaders - the one abouit the Flat earth with heaven above and hell below - WITHOUT sailing out to the abyss to check it out, is the most notable one.
We haven't had "100s of trained poeple" to do a proper investigation that complies with the rules of investigating a fire accident.
Thetan1974 6 months ago
@roquefortfiles
What do you mean "recording nothing"? They recorded what plenty of brave firemen, policemen and other first responders call controlled demolitions. HOW these were done is for a new investigation to find out.
You even spending time on truthers - making you look like a person obsessed with poeple believing in God or Santa telling them not to believe in these things - only exposes your fear of the truth and a real investigation. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thetan1974 6 months ago
You know that Danny Jewenko had "a clue" about what a cd looks like. It would be interesting to see what he would have had to say about WTC 1 and 2 BEFORE being spoon fed the "natural fire enduced collapse" fairy tale "theory."
Thetan1974 6 months ago
@luvmyctd
Dont let shills get to you. Every one who watches theese videos
have a clue. Sleepers that dont give a shit, well, theres nothing one can
do about it. But id say 99% of the nistfollowers in the tube are shills.
xNAJAFx 2 months ago 2
idiots.
atrophya 9 months ago
@atrophya You are correct ... ANYBODY that still believes the US govt "official story" still, after 10 years ... IS AN IDIOT! Great observation!
luvmyctd 8 months ago
For a GREAT video showing pre-planted explosives, going off in the WTC towers, throughout the whole time they were standing,see>>>>>>
"Comparison Vid-The Planned WTC Demolition"
molitor2005 9 months ago
Has anyone wondered how it could be that the names of Jones,Gage,&Reynolds, have not only been mentioned on mainstream media, but their theory mentioned also?We all know the media is not free anymore,& nothing "airs" without 'higher ups' approval.The fact that both have occurred should speak VOLUMES!Please check out this video where Gage is "exposed"& watch his responses, it is very telling!>>>>
v=ir0vukXoWGU
molitor2005 9 months ago
Un real!
onceANexile 9 months ago
Assistance (explosives) was needed to destroy WTC1&2, not to mention 7WTC. Plus they cracked the"tub" (foundation) that always supported those buildings. Think about the dust and girders being ejected, a still photo was analyzed and showed at least 30-35% of weight is represented. To believe NIST, "collapse" occurs as buildings get lighter and lighter, as more&more debris is ejected, ur dumb as box of rocks. MICC did "shock&awe" on U.S. to "Oswald"(LeeHarvey) OBL as "badguy" in TWoT. Cheers suck
trex9008 9 months ago
I see a building being blown to smithereens from top to bottom along w/everything inside. The Bozos at NIST should be TARRED&FEATHERED for their disrespect of those that died that day. Shame on America, u deserve what u get when God comes. Engineering common sense says any "collapse" could NOT extend below points of impact. Floors below were intact&unaffected by whatever platform was introduced into WTC1&2 u silly bastards. Initiation,"collapse," and destruction to below street level had assit
trex9008 9 months ago
DIMITRI KHALEZOV UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR DEMOLITION.
end of story
checkThrice 9 months ago
Thanks for the post. If this were control demolition or some sort of particle weapon, then that would leave serious problem problems with the design and the execution of the design of the building. It would have to mean that steel, the steel connections, and concrete were underperforming. Even you used a low PSI concrete, it doesn't turn to powder. The same is true with steel, plastic, human bodies, black-boxes, jet engines, etc.
eotto2001 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tiatdivad Looking at this video of the collapse, I can't see the enormous weight above the floors that would cause them to crash into one another. All I can see is a huge cloud of dust at the point where the collapse is taking place. Surely there would have to be a significant portion of intact building falling onto each floor to cause them to collapse in the way we are supposed to believe. And where are the support columns?
gregspandex 9 months ago
Comment removed
gregspandex 9 months ago
How did the Dancing Israelis know in advance to "document" the WTC catastrophe?
Zionutsy 9 months ago
9 11 was an inside job...get wit it people,its just another example of a false flag operation..isreali mossad may have been implicated with this orcastrated attack but who knows...go to ground zero on 9 11 and demand a new investigation.ill be there, see ya there..9 11 was an INSIDE JOB
MrKodak147 9 months ago
what happend to building 7 then it was on bbc news saying that it fell down when it was obviously in the background when the reporter was speaking whats wrong did one of the planes not go acording to plan did on of the remotes not work was flight 93 meant to hit building 7
K1DNEYTH1EVE 9 months ago
It was clearly planes that knocked over the 3 buildings... I dont know what you guys are thinking! I see no explosions but air being forced out of the bottom floors from the pressure build up...
Please return to work now, thanks.
GovCreatesAccounts 9 months ago
@GovCreatesAccounts I just don't see it either....sure I see the "jets", but thats because of the 20 floor piece of the bldg collapsing downward, and look at the external box "Y" shaped columns peeling away, mushrooming like a bullet jacket.....doesn't look like any controlled demo I've seen....never seen a bldg that tall CD'd from the top down
EvanQuinn07 9 months ago
It was a nuclear demolition watch Dimitri Khalezovs Presentation it covers everything top to bottom explains everything in detail. these towers were pulverized into dust as this video shows. It would be impossible for nano-thermite to turn turn steel into dust. there were 1400 cars toasted over the blocks around the towers what can do that? DIMITRI KHALEZOV please watch his presentation and interviews
broke31 9 months ago
How can this happen without explosives?
Seigu007 9 months ago
game set match to sheep, this cant be explained away by fire
pt1gard 10 months ago
@pt1gard Unfortunately gullible minds are immune to facts. There is even an interview with an ex KGB guy who was involved in brainwashing studies and he said "A mind that has been compromised by demoralisation, propaganda and other brainwashing techniques will not believe the truth even if you show them all the evidence, video's, pictures etc..."
galaxything 9 months ago
@galaxything .. good pts my friend, i read where 20% can be easily hypnotized, 60% on fence, and 20% cant be .... i would like to see those 20 tough ones do a little research, a lot of YT people know whats up, but in public i dont see it
pt1gard 9 months ago
Looks like the weight of the collapsing building "blew out" the lower beams. Not an "explosion."
misterjim100 1 year ago
has anyone done the math here? how much explosives would it take to pulverize the concrete like this does? it is turning do dust as it falls. is it still under the influence of the explosives at that time? why/how is it still coming apart?
onepercentor 1 year ago
@onepercentor
Check out the below video, (link provided). There are secondary explosions occurring as the debris is falling to the ground...and these can be visually seen with observation of the frames which include backdrop against the sky.
I have just added several video links to the description of this video... things posted since this video was placed.
WTC SOUTH TOWER: 1) SMOKING GUNS; 2) SMOKING GUNS (FOLLOW-UP); 3) EXPLODING PROJECTILE
watch?v=eIkLOMZnkwM
ricthuse 1 year ago 5
@onepercentor 9/11 researcher Dr. Steven E. Jones, in "Revisiting 9/11/2001 – Applying the Scientific Method," discusses the tiny iron-rich spheres, (residue of reacted thermite), which are in the dust from the WTC.
Based on the mass of these iron-rich spheres found in a sample of the dust, Jones estimates (roughly) that about .04 percent of the dust was "iron-rich spherule," which would be "of the order of ten tons." This provides an idea of how much thermite was in the WTC towers.
ricthuse 1 year ago 5
@ricthuse I've worked in engineering and have seen thermite used to cut steel. You'd need a damn sight more than ten tons to bring down the WTC.
Dr Jones' samples were taken from the site after clearance had started. We know that thermite was used in the clear-up operation, as the most basic research would show.
DaMuttzNutz 1 year ago
@ricthuse I'd think twice about quoting anything said or written by Dr Jones, as he's a mormon nut job, who also believes, amongst other weird stuff, that Jesus Christ visited the Americas. Hardly the most credible scientist out there, is he?
DaMuttzNutz 1 year ago
@ricthuse YOU KNOW NOTHING YOU JEW AGENT OF ALEX JONES. YOUR LIES WILL BE EXPOSED, AND TRUTH ABOUT THE HOLOGRAMS WILL BE EXPOSED.
ppwalk05 10 months ago
@onepercentor 1500 lbs of semtext in the basement of the North Tower back in 1993 failed to bring it down. It takes weeks of work to wire a building like this for demolition. It couldn't be done secretly
DaMuttzNutz 1 year ago
@DaMuttzNutz There was a 9 month long elevator renovation going on allowing access to the core columns of the towers. I agree its a big job, but there is no doubt, explosives must have been used.
GlobalSatori 1 year ago
@GlobalSatori we'd have heard the explosives going off. The noise made would have been deafening...unless you know of a way to release all that energy without making any noise.
DaMuttzNutz 1 year ago
@DaMuttzNutz There were over 300 reports by firemen in the official oral history records detailing multiple explosions going off. The federal government had this information blocked and it was only revealed after they were taken to court under freedom of information. None of this evidence was included in the 9/11 Commission report and firemen had to sign a gagging order to receive compensation. Plus thermite type explosives are less noisy.
GlobalSatori 1 year ago
@GlobalSatori THOSE 300 REPORTS WERE WRITTEN BY JEWS. THEY SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE HOLOGRAMS!
ppwalk05 10 months ago
@DaMuttzNutz "It couldn't be done secretly"
That makes about as much sense as, say, a man standing under a downpour and saying "It can't be raining" because the weather report said it wouldn't.
The towers were exploded. Therefore, it was possible to explode them.
It was done somehow.
Dulcimerea 6 months ago
@onepercentor can you elaborate (explain ) further on your point?"it is turning to dust as it falls" are you saying some thing in line of what Judy Wood was saying, that there was some high energy weapon?
albertsneijMD 9 months ago
@onepercentor yes, it would take way more energy than is available for the collapse. In this collapse all the energy would have to be used to deliver the material to the ground. There is no left over energy for pulverization.
UNIVERSITYHI 8 months ago 2
@UNIVERSITYHI So what you are saying (without knowing it) is that without vertical support the building would just hover there.
Believing your comment is true means one also has to believe that gravity does not exist.
flanksteak2 8 months ago
@flanksteak2 Without vertical support? Wtf, so the 47 MASSIVE interior vertical columns just magically disappeared? Gravity my ASS! Forget where this was or why you believe it happened for a second ... DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE? C'mon ... what do you see? Pretend that AlQaeda tried to convince you of this INSTEAD of the US govt. Would you still believe it? No, I thought not.
luvmyctd 8 months ago
@luvmyctd Uh oh. You're retarded
flanksteak2 8 months ago
@flanksteak2 ANYBODY that watches this video (even without understanding the other mountain of evidence proving this was an inside job) and still believes this a GRAVITATIONAL collapse because of a jet fuel fire near the top floors is completely braindead. What the fuck is wrong with you? Millions of people have been murdered because of this lie and millions more will die unless arrogant clowns like you can pull your head out of your ass. So many good people dead yet you still waste oxygen. Fuck
luvmyctd 8 months ago 22
@luvmyctd Do your parents know that you are sneaking into their liquor cabinet and then playing on Youtube?
flanksteak2 8 months ago
@luvmyctd I totally agree. These people are really dishonoring the victims by forgetting and blaming other nations without evidence. I don't understand how they can have the time to write nonsense comments but not even have watched or read one page about the facts from independent sources. Why would one believe the gov and mainstream media more than architects & engineers, pilots, scientists, demolition experts, military officers, neutral thinking first eye-witnesses, etc. ?
80sMeavyHetal 1 month ago 2
@luvmyctd people will attack you when they don't understand :D
br0wnb3rry 1 month ago
@onepercentor Dr Judy Wood explains how it could happen and give evidence, i have not seen these guys do much
br0wnb3rry 1 month ago
Interesting how both buildings fell @ FREEFALL SPEED as if there was NO RESISTANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago 2
@facebookprogrammer you mean all 3 buildings dont forget buldg 7
mikestephen48 1 year ago
They did it. People within our own government. For power, and war profits, and control.
Tell others.
The revolution will not be in the streets, but in the hearts and minds of the American people.
Once you KNOW, you will never be there fool or tool again.
Death to the people who did this, and to those who aided & abeted in it, by withholding information on this crime. These people in the gov, need to know that "just doing my job" ain't going to cut it anymore than Hitler's guys @Nuremberg
CaptainBuckSnort 2 years ago 2
In John Farmers new book In John Farmers book: The Ground Truth: The Story Behind Americas Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue, and I agree.
Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.
CaptainBuckSnort 2 years ago