I believe Uzzius008 asked Kazax01 to provide proof of the arguments presented to disprove the origins of the Bible. I have heard that anything written within 100 years of it being witnessed by the actual eye witnesses is pretty good proof that it actually happened.
Think about this: the more digging the do in the middle east the more proof they have that what Jesus actually said and did happened. They are able to dig up and prove that such people and places did exist.
The Bible is a gathering of writings of different Jews and early Christians, they were hand picked and assembled together in the 4th century buy an early Catholic church. There is no historical evidence that the gospels or any (!) other books were the exact writings of apostles; stories in the Bible are recollections of what happened during Jesus's time and can not be seriously taken as Words of God! You want proof? Do some Bible history research!
Actually your argument are fallacious,i became after 23 years of my life a christian after months of accurate research and such foolish argument you are presenting are Dan Brown ouze without a scholar basis,it's just speculation without historicity,could you tell me your sources?
This is such an immature and silly way of defending something so important as "Can we trust the Bible"! His arguments that this guy presents are completely bias and do not pass any scientific, experimental testing. Its all blah, blah, blah. He talks about group of students who claim to be atheists and asked if they read Bible they said no, than he suggests that if only they read the Bible they might have changed their minds. Well how about studying on how Bible came to be in the first place?
I believe Uzzius008 asked Kazax01 to provide proof of the arguments presented to disprove the origins of the Bible. I have heard that anything written within 100 years of it being witnessed by the actual eye witnesses is pretty good proof that it actually happened.
Think about this: the more digging the do in the middle east the more proof they have that what Jesus actually said and did happened. They are able to dig up and prove that such people and places did exist.
palovell 2 years ago
=SECOND HALF=
The Bible is a gathering of writings of different Jews and early Christians, they were hand picked and assembled together in the 4th century buy an early Catholic church. There is no historical evidence that the gospels or any (!) other books were the exact writings of apostles; stories in the Bible are recollections of what happened during Jesus's time and can not be seriously taken as Words of God! You want proof? Do some Bible history research!
kazax01 3 years ago
Actually your argument are fallacious,i became after 23 years of my life a christian after months of accurate research and such foolish argument you are presenting are Dan Brown ouze without a scholar basis,it's just speculation without historicity,could you tell me your sources?
Uzzius008 2 years ago
This is such an immature and silly way of defending something so important as "Can we trust the Bible"! His arguments that this guy presents are completely bias and do not pass any scientific, experimental testing. Its all blah, blah, blah. He talks about group of students who claim to be atheists and asked if they read Bible they said no, than he suggests that if only they read the Bible they might have changed their minds. Well how about studying on how Bible came to be in the first place?
kazax01 3 years ago
House on the rock versus the house on the sand.
He/she who hears the law and obeys it versus he/she who hears and doesn't obey.
ontheseventhday 3 years ago