Not trying to be an ass here but at 01:36 you say that mammals where warm blooded and carried their eggs inside their bodies. Last time I checked mammals don't lay eggs. So what do you mean?
@Dondonovan Ova are "Eggs" in the Biological sense. as is the Placenta,.. and it is inside the Mothers body,..a significant biological change for survival
Lots of Mammals and Birds do migrate(warm blooded).Lots of reptils,fishes and insects don't(cold blooded).And vice-versa.On the other hand,newest discoverys point tha Dinossaurs had warm blood and,some,protofeathers.Migration does not explain the extintion for ALL species of Dinossaurs.
@PUMAPUNKU2011 On the other hand, what about the genoflage of the cross-gen antio phlanges type as a control group for intra -grouping of all flages regardless of outside info-metrics? 90% of researchers don't even consider integrating this as an over-riding effect.
i am running through your videos, this is amazing.
your putting together some very fundamental pieces of the way reality works; i don't know if your doing this yourself or not, but i am grateful that you have the courage to stand up for a radical idea and share it with others.
IDEA - do you think that it is our own consciousness of "distance" which is creating the plates to separate and water to form on top?
@Destroyer4700 You're saying Warm Blooded animals don't MIGRATE? Today, are you saying the animals that migrate are COLD-BLOODED??? Like Crocodiles and Lizards? Someone tell me here, is there a level of stupid beyond JUST PLAIN STUPID? Or is "stupid" an end game.
Finally someone with a brain Dinosaurs died because of Mother nature not a blast that hit there Earth 65 million yrs ago with the killing power of 1 billion Atom bombs. People should always question and reason everything for themselves.
I am not quite sure if what you are talking about is supposed to make any sense. Anyways, like I said before, we did not know much of anything about diseases before scientific process and technology came around. For example, in the early 1900's, we still believed in female 'hysteria', thinking that a floating uterus caused mental disorders. This has now been scientifically disproved (obviously). Many diseases have also turned from a threat to no threat due to scientific medicine.
Interesting. Too many variables, IMHO, to say for certain.
Who knows, maybe some evolved into lizard people the big game were hunted to extinction, like the giant sloth in North America hunted by homo sapiens.
@SuperTruth77 It wasn't a meteorite. It was Australia tearing away from Antarctica, on the other side of the world. You Americans HAVE TO BELIEVE everything HAD TO happen in YOUR BACK YARD!
@firejack Some theories has been shown untrue, but it is those same theories that stood as a starting point to then end up with a more correct version later on. Science and theories build upon itself. Also, saying some theories were wrong is to leave out that many theories are right. Thanks to science, we know about gravity, diseases, health hazards...and not to mention we have things like this computer which you are probably using. Thanks science.
@StormSquadDotNet NOTHING to thank MAN'S involvment in science for. We're barely smart enough to see the obvious when it is staring us in the face. Men give each other prizes for noticing what couldn't be more clear if it jumped up and bit us on our face. Our own ignorance and sense of denial of what we see before our eyes holds us back,
Two dino fossils in Museum Nat His of similar creature, one with out-facing legs. One DOWN-FACING, The Museum wonders WHY down-facing legs evolved?
@StormSquadDotNet You wouldn't know about gravity without science? Really? Diseases? No one understood dis-ease before science? Health hazards? That one is a joke unless you still have faith in the dogma about hygiene.
Computer, there you go. Thing is, no one person really gets out they work. It takes a collective hive of technology all working together. Doesn't mean our theories are correct just because something works.
@firejack just to clear the air, a theory is not a guess. It is also not given strength by the number of people who believe it. It gains its strength from empirical evidence, being falsifiable, and by making good predictions. Science has an "auto-correct" feature built in by making any "good" theory public, so that it can be reviewed and critiqued by anyone who wants to.
@JamesThWilliams Fancy numbers and ideas but still that's exactly what it is. There is no facts involved. It is not Scientific Law. Scientists don't like to use the word 'guess' cause it implies that their 'theory' could be wrong, where theories by scientist's self definition is true only because it's accepted by a number greater than detractors. It's semantics. There have been hundreds of theories proven wrong with time and experience. But until it has been observed to happen, it is a guess.
(2) A reason why the theory of a meteorite-induced mass extinction exists is because of an iridium rich layer known as the KT boundary globally marking the period of extinction. Meteorites are typically high in the element iridium. Your ‘theory’ fails to explain the mass of other extinctions, and is not supported by what we find in geological records, whereas the current scientific consensus is more consistent with the evidence and has far more explanatory merit.
@nealadamsdotcom Iridium concentrations found in the KT boundary are typically too high to be a characteristic of volcanic activity. Plus we have other deposits in the layer, such as tektites, shocked quartz, and a sum of other isotopic anomalies not characteristic of volcanic fallout at all, but of non-terrestrial impact. 'Impact theory' enjoys overwhelming support within the scientific community because of this (even though the comic book artist community may have different ideas...)
@nealadamsdotcom Which volcanoe was responsible for laying down the KT boundary? Also, you didn't answer the question. How does your theory explain the mass extinction, not just of dinosaurs, but of countless other species of plants and animals on the land and in the seas at that time?
@DannyPhantomBeast Actually, if you study the Crustal Age Map I sent you to, you will see that Australia rifted and spread from Antarctica and that rift circumnavigated the whole bottom of the Earth at this very time. I cannot imagime such a world-girding even NOT having incredible volcanic consequences, It beggars any event since the first breakup.
(1) (1) I hope you realise many other species went extinct along with the dinosaurs between the cretaceous and the tertiary. A great many species of plant, fish and marine lizards, avian species, and some mammals all became extinct relatively abruptly during this period along with most of the dinosaur species. A very large number of species that went extinct in this period WERE NOT migratory, nor could they have been significantly affected by a gradual separation of the continents. (Cont)
@FactThis As now Some species of Plants and animals are dependent for their survival on other species.
Seed are deposited in new locations after seasonal migration. Massive Crocidiliand 25 to 35 ft long ate dinosaurs as did other massive shallow sea creatures. For 30 million years dinosaur species dwindled by half and half again.
Did you know this?
Did you know Australia broke free completely from Antarctica about b 60 MYA, with MUCH volcanic activity.
@cashdaddyg Yes, I do have a theory of everything. You sort of have to. Everything is connected to everything else. And so once you solve one problem, it leads you to another. And if you don't get them all, you don't get any. Or as the punchline to a great joke goes, it was all one piece.
You can ask questions if you want. I blush to say, I'll have nearly all the answers.
@cashdaddyg 1. HOMEWORK. 2. STICKING TO FACTS! 3.I DON"T LIKE THEORIES.
blush? The answer seems SOOo egotistical. Sorry for that.
Ex: If Dinosaurs Migrated seasonally HEMISPHEREICALLY twice a year. this leads to certain conclusions.
So. first the focus must be on the Planet. If the planet was condusive, why would they NOT?? THEN they ALL must evolve long legs and ALL MIGRATE., Which explains Hemispheric migrations of BIRDS against sense.
@cashdaddyg Youtube usually underlines misspelling for you to fix.
Actually, No Most new theories from the scientific community are based, incredible as it seems, ON OTHER Theories.
No, No one MUST study other sciences, but they are DOOMED TO BE WRONG! AND will spend their lives on quests to patch up OTHER BAD SCIENCE! That's what religion is, exactly.
If the Pangea Theory is totally wrong, and it is. How many sad useless papers and books must be re-written to undo all that wrong work?
@nowforfeit HUH? 200 Million Years Ago all the continental land masses were connected into one contiguous crust that completely covered the whole of a smaller Earth. Gravity was 1/4 of what it is today, Air was thin and oxygen rich. Climate was sub-tropical from Pole to pole. There were no mountain ranges to block the free flow of migrations and breezes and the water lay in shallow seas upon the land.
@nealadamsdotcom ok, so lets just pretend that earth was smaller 200million years ago, like you have force fed on all you other videos. you do realize that wouldn't change the gravity of the earth. the mass of earth is 5.9742 × 1024 kilograms at 12,750 km in diameter. but if the diameter was say 11,000km the mass hasn't changed, thus gravity is the same. and if you think that gravity depends on the size of an object rather then its mass, then your not even worth listening to.
@nealadamsdotcom Matter cannot be created or destroyed. If Earth is growing, then the matter for growth (magma) must already exist within the Earth. Wouldn't that mean that Earth's gravity would be constant throughout your model? If the mass of Earth increased from external matter (comets, asteroids, etc.) then I could see the gravity increasing. Earth can't grow without increase in matter, so where is that matter being created? You leave a lot of big questions unanswered in your assertions.
This video, after great thought, is logical. Logic is good enough for me. Dinosaurs were too big to hunt small animals but small animals were quick and small enough to eat the Dinosaurs eggs. Simple! Birds, a version of dinosaurs, survived because they nested high above the ground, in most cases. Plus, the various rise and falls of the sea heights, divided and separated the land masses isolating certain species. That's good enough for me.
Anyways though, this theory of extinction doesn't make much sense. The geological change happened so slowly that they would have time to change their migration patterns, or even evolve to cross water. The problem with dinosaurs is that they are too big to be practical. I'm reluctant to say it, but they're better suited to a planet with less gravity. I say they didn't go extinct but just changed. Even mammals descended from dinosaurs.
Birds are dinosaurs that survived. If your definition of dinosaur only includes those that went extinct , then it is going to be easy to prove the selective destruction of the dinosaurs fits your theory.
Oh, I thought the land masses didn't rotate during the world expansion - then what is going on with spain?
@JPO1618 Not just Spain, But Alaska. Kamchatka, and Central America. When two continents pull apart,..what you may call TAGS can be pulled by either . As the ocean floor was measured over the years by pole reversals
they discovered Spain revolved by 30˚. It was easy to figure out. As Africa pulled away it ripped open the Bay of Biscay and rotated Spain down. Interesting.
@TheCopaceticMan Why? Well, You're laughing because you're stupid and like most humans you think that what you KNOW now about the way things are WON'T CHANGE. YOU are too stupid to know or to have learned that everything in science and what we know,..CHANGES with time and all theories and most knowledge changes with time.
Ever ask yourself whycome the dinosaurs that lived in the Northern Hemisphere also seemed to have lived in the southern hemisphere?
@TheCopaceticMan - These gigantic shattered hundreds of miles wide and tall, (crustal ages), gave purchase to the only massive subduction on earth. The Ring of Fire. Volcanic upheaval of this event, would so massively eclipse the small force of a meteor impact, that it beggars description.
Sea creature and reptiles fed on migrating dinosaurs. Life forms that become extinct, have impact on other life forms. Flying dinosaurs, (birds) continued, because they migrated in the air. You've failed.
@TheCopaceticMan - There are no other "sites". That impact crater is so small as to be a joke, and under water for the most part. I'll tell you something else that's the same age as the extinction event. 60MYA a gigantic rift split Australia from Antarctica. This rift continued & circumnavigated the whole of Antarctica, & from that time, it's the greatest geological rifting & spreading on earth. That spreading drove Australia upward with such force, that it shattered Indonesian oceanic plate.
@TheCopaceticMan - 1. Do you realize that mammals history goes back as far a s the dinosaurs, and that of course mammals were egg eaters, and continue to be egg eaters. To imply this is not the case, is ignorance. 2. No other site on the internet, except newer sites, speak of the earth growing. Nor do they speak of the consequences, one of which is the destruction of the dinosaur's pathways. There are no other "sites".
70% of life on earth was wiped out at the KT boundary. Not just Dinosaurs. Plants and animals. Various fish and aquatic reptiles where also wiped out. I will say this. Despite the seeming lack of any real scientific degree you have.(And at this point you can't lie and say you have anything resembling a degree or even have had a career in a scientific field) The closetest thing you got to right on this is that before the KT event is that yes there were declining numbers of dinosaurs.
@pjt pit-stop! Why do, seemingly intelligent people loose the capacity to deduce as they get older? I believe it is the "NEED TO HAVE ANSWERS,...to attach their EGOS TO".
Like "It's a requirement of thinking and presenting revolutionary thought, that you have a degree, when, in fact, logic and deduction would indicate the opposite should be true. Revolution NEVER comes from the inside, merely change.
You must realize that it's a waste of time to talk to you. Your mind is frozen in place.
All human beings in virtually all phases of their lives seem to plateau at a certain level of understanding and get blocked at advancing beyond it because of their inability to unlearn what they were taught and accepted as truth by teachers and/or life experience at formative moments of their lives. They accepted explanations that appeared to "fit the story" from teachers who would seem to know better than themselves, teachers they either trusted, or....
...teachers they either trusted or who had too much power to challenge. Every teacher is imperfect and teaches from partial understanding. Every explanation we accept in those moments is flawed and incomplete, and generally we do not realize it, because we accept "what works" within that moment of understanding, and absorb the flaws that go along with it without clearly recognizing they are there.
@pjt well to say he has no degree to talk is stupid, very stupid!! You don't need a degree to ask and answer your own questions on subjects that have no proven answers! I found Neals Adams theories just by not buying the plate tectonics theory when trying to explain to my 10year old son and I searched for a better understanding. All the land mass in one place???!!! hmmm... I have a degree in physiotherapy but able to apply my logic to many things....
then what about the migratory dinosaurs that did not cross the mediteranean, or what about those other creatures from that period that did also migrate over that route? shouldn't they have died out as well?
It seems so out of the blue, so... like a fish out of water, and it doesn't explain a whole lot of the other events that went on...
also, talk about backwards reasoning: "Better = extinction" I'll talk it over with the natural scientists at the museum first :3
@grandpied How could a dinosaur NOT migrate. Seasonal plants die. No fur. Don't burrow. Don't store fat for hard times.lay eggs on the ground to freeze. Makes no sense. WHY wouldn't they migrate. What's stopping them from going to a more favorable place? They have the down-facing legs for it?
@nealadamsdotcom Sorry about that, is what I meant was is that dinosaurs couldn't migrate after Earth grew, and that's what killed them and if that hadn't have then later the greater gravity would have.
@grandpied I really doubt that. Had the continents not broken up, the dinosaurs would have evolved, slowly to the increasing gravity. All other species did,..but only the dinosaurs evolved long legs to migrate hemispherically.. THAT was their downfall.
@nealadamsdotcom There's precedence for your postulation that dinosaurs would have kept up with evolution even if the continents hadn't broken apart while Earth grew thus increasing gravity: at least many species evolved smaller due to at least in part increasing gravity, one to name; giant dragon flies evolved smaller.
@grandpied The gravity didn't increase as the world "grew", if any thing it decreased. the centrifugal force is not gravity, it counters gravity hence a larger diameter would decrease the gravity and gravity becomes higher as you get closer to the dense metal core so again a decrease from "growth".
The higher you go the lower the gravity, tho gravity doesn't changes that fast, the gravity in (LE)orbit is about 90% of normal, the weightlessness comes from freefall, not due to lack of gravity.
@nealadamsdotcom yes, but....they didn't necessarily migrate, just flourished where favourable conditions existed and died off where they aren't. Your statement makes one wonder why the polar bears don't head to N. Europe where the glaciers and ice flows are thicker....because they don't have the weather channel!!!!
That's a pretty stupid theory, because the "dinosaurs were better they died".
Us humans are better but our planet is now over populating, expanding the life span, flourishing, only problem now is our ignorance we have for the planet, causing global warming.
I am almost ashamed of myself for commenting here. My mere acknowledgement of this crazy-ass post gives it a credence that it does not deserve.
For starters, it is incorrect to say that ONLY dino died off at the K-T boundary. Many replites went extinct, too. As did almost all monotremes. Some fish seem to have been affected too. Plus, not all dinos died. Avian dinos survived.
What all the affected populations had in common was egg nests buried in sand. Extinction culprit = acid rain
Actually, Dinosaurs evolved into Birds. Especially theropod. Dinosaurs didnt' get extinct, they evolved into birds. the T-Rex had down covering its body (at least the young ones) and the Raptors were feathered. Gradually they reduced its size to improve mobility (therefore, migration) and learned to nest in more intricate places. They also learned to use the feathery for flying (going through gliding first, of course) and developed beaks out of their previously developed teeth.
There is no evolution. We got mass extinctions - nothing then the flora and fauna and animals pop out designed for a totally different ecosystem period. Fossil record bears it out - big change and clean breaks with the past. I also suspect we lost a large chunk of the atmosphere in the past and had 100 % extinction. I suspect evidence is in front of us.
...Some carnivorous dinosaurs like the T-Rex for example, migrated to snow covered areas like the outer artic circle area, there is evidence of T-Rex having fur feather like, on it's scaly skin to keep warm!
@nealadamsdotcom .....Yeah, that was 200 million years ago, but towards the end of the T-rex era, (T. rex lived during the late Cretaceous period, about 85 million to 65 million years ago) it got colder. ...T-Rex ventured toward the far Northern parts of the Northern hemisphere, There is evidence from Fossil finds of that.
@nealadamsdotcom ....Also.....The discovery of numerous species of dinosaurs in the arctic is causing scientists to reconsider old theories about dinosaurs only living in tropical climates. It is now known that many dinosaurs, including Edmontosaurus and Troodon, lived in cold weather climates for at least part of the year. .....Maybe, T-Rex is buried under ice, up there too!
What got me in this idea is the correlation between the extinction of dinosaurs and the non-extinction of everything else. Is that correct? To me this is a big thing cause it blows away the theory of some comet doing a mass extinction of everything which I've never believed.
I say humans killed the dinosaurs. My theory is just as good as yours. We kill those more effectively than anything else on the planet. I am virtually certain we had some large populations in the past and that they must have become very skillful at killing dino's and that's because the the dino's were dangerous and because man liked how they tasted.
@freepeoplenow I dont agree that it is laughable but I can see how when we are told the same thing over & over we assume it is absolute fact. I have always thought that most information given about Pangea & dinosaurs etc is based on a collection of small "assumed" facts brought together to make one big theory & if even one of those fact is incorrect then it throws off the theory. I believe we have it mostly right but not necessarily 100% right. These videos make a similar amount of sense to me
Unfortunately Donosaurs laid their eggs on the GROUND. AND mammals LOVE EGGS. Dwindling populations can't protect eggs, on the ground. Birds like eggs. Shallow seas drain, Giant reptiles guard dwindling shallow Sea pathways. Then there's ONGOING NATURAL DISASTERS. About 60 MYA and Australia broke off from Antarctica, Australian plate crunched into Asian plate shattering it,
If Grazing animals die off their Predators die also,
cool. I pressume the earth expanding theory is supportive of this new sea.
But this is just one spot in the earth.
are you suggesting rappid earth expansion, creating vast seas, that within a few generations stopped migratory animals from creating a next generation?
I bet SOME dinos would've found a place to put their eggs, even without traversing 5000km to do so.
you got very creative and novel ideas, and great videos, but your theories are never complete..:)
@nealadamsdotcom 1. Most of the species that went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous, such as foraminiferas, were not dependent on Dinosaurs in any way. 2. Many structural and geomorphic features present in the Alps and Amanos mountain ranges suggest the African and Arabic plate has been converging with the Eurasian plate since the Jurassic. 3. I used caribous to illustrate that one cannot assume mammals did not migrate back then.
4. I agree with your observation. I am not a puppy.
@haz020190 - You don't know what you are talking about. If you have facts, just give them. Read my statements. They are listings of facts. Read yours. They are opinions and speechifying, and not one single fact. Perhaps you cannot read?
@haz020190 1. This is MY HOUSE. 2. I don't take shite. 3. I don't like stupidity and/or ignorance. Why are you asking about Hadrosaur? It's very hard to follow migrations with so little evidence over so great a time. CLUES! Where are they FOUND? What causes migration? Temperature and food supply.
GRASS in all forms DID NOT EXIST, plants must be fresh and NOT depleted. Earth was evolving SEASONAL PLANTS. While North depleted, South was blossomed.
@haz020190 Ankylosaurs are NOT short and stocky. LOOK AT THEIR BONES before you answer, DAMNIT. PUNK! Then show me someone who knows more about anatomy than ME!
Giraffes have long legs to reach high branches. Evolution works from NEED, and for many reasons( LORD, why am I explaining this elementary shit to this idiot?)
Dinosaurs from No Am are currently found in Antarctica!
@haz020190 We see their fossils on either side. Short-sighted humans are too stupid to realize that THEN there WEREN'T TWO SIDES! It was ONE,...with increasing seasons. Without changing seasons Long-legged dinosaurs are not needed. Reptiles will do.
Teachers told me that when Dinosaur bones are only found under a certain layer of dust that is not found in our solar system it is of a different galaxy because it has a isotope than the ones found in our galaxy. The dust is from the meteor that hit the earth which, blocked out the sun, The meteor being from that distant galaxy. Those other animals weren't alive in the same time era. Notice how we find fossils from other animals such as fish. How do you think fossil fuels were made.
@69MrUsername69 im sorry but a meteor cannot leave an entire galaxy and travel to another. the energy required to escape the gravity of a galaxy would be enormous.
@Wrecktapus NOT by "making" new matter like Bodies with an "INTERNAL ENGINE.
But they do have" Increasing INTERNAL POWER"! It's called GRAVITY, which increases with size to accrete EX-ternally, and IN-ternally like Geodes.
Large clusters of matter are attracted to join the surface. Single atoms, however can ride the crystal latices to the core to attach and push outward from there. emptying spaces for more atoms
The Hydridic Earth theory is a theory proposed in 1968 by Soviet geologist Vladimir Larin. The theory contradicts the generally accepted views on the Structure of the Earth. The theory makes certain predictions that can be dismissed or proven through experiments.
if this were true not all dinosaurs wold have died in the same period, what about "america"'s dinosaurs? they also died, and of corse there is all the evidence for the asteroid hitting earth.
@mauriciohavok Here's a theory for you. A GIGANTIC meteorite crashed on Earth filled with supersonic mission controlled jelly beans with NAMES on them, which sought out only dinosaurs with the right names, and when they tracked the exact right ones down, they crashed through their eyeballs and exploded in their brains.
@nealadamsdotcom a) there is physical evidence that an asteroid collided with earth 65 million years ago, ever heard of the iridium layer? and b) not only dinosaurs died in that mass extinction, all the water reptiles died, so did the flying reptiles, also millions of different species of plants
For this to have caused a wide scale extinction event it would have happened over an extremely short period of time, possibly weeks or even days. What evidence do you have to support a time line for this event? How can you assume all dinosaurs were migratory? What about the marine mosasaurs and plesiosaurs that also went extinct. Couldn't they have swam away? And pterosaurs could fly. Were they migratory as well? I suspect you're full of shit.
@deepashtray You make some very good points. In addition, would all dinosaurs follow transcontinental migratory patterns? Would a geological process as slow as this kill off so many so quickly, and in one event? Given the time frame, wouldn't at least some species adapt their migratory habits? Not to mention the fact many species of mammal do migrate, as do a number of lizard species.
This man makes broad assumptions and ignores far too much, all for the sake of being a contrarian it appears.
@deepashtray and Fact This1. Scientists agree it took place over 1 million years. 2. ALL dinosaurs had long legs.
3. The Earth was becoming SEASONAL in climate and seasons mean DEATH!
As Dinosaurs died off Mammals became bolder. and Mammals eat eggs! The fewer the dinosaurs, the bolder the Mammals. The marine dinosaurs in shallow seas fed on migrating dinosaurs. Pterosaurs ate small dinosaurs and couldn't fly over mountains. Why? Too cold and didn't have protection from the cold.
@nealadamsdotcom Weird that I should have insomnia right now. Pterosaurs ate fish. 1 million yrs is plenty of time to adapt to new migration routes, migratory birds (direct descendants of dinos) do it. Long legs would aid migration adaptability. There is documented fossil evidence that at least 1 species of dinosaurs survived on the continent of Antarctica by piling together to hibernate through the winter season under the snow for some 4 months... which shoots the whole seasonal thing down.
@deepashtray Birds survived. THEY are dinosaurs. Their beaks SEAL against cold and they are covered by feathers, and they don't lay their eggs on the GROUND! They evolved to survive BEFORE it became critical!
THERE IS NO MAGIC!
The reasons the dinosaurs died off is the SAME reasons that they became kings of the Earth, and the reasons that the mammals survived is because they were forced to endure hardship within their evolutionary patterns. FUR, Hibernate..under the ground, live young etc.
@nealadamsdotcom For your "theory" to have even a chance would require a minimum of 2 very unlikely prerequisites. 1) All dinosaur species migrated long distances. 2) All migration routes crossed actively dividing continental plates. It's well documented that the break up of Pangaea, which began 200 mya, led to an explosive diversification of dinosaur species, not their mass extinction. Dr. Robert Bakker argues that the re-connection of land masses is what caused the dinos to go extinct.
@deepashtray - Dr Baker was given the wrong information by his science fellows, that continents came together. They did not come together, they only pulled apart. How do you make a poor theory? By accepting the stupid theories that other scientists present, adn then building your theory on that.
@nealadamsdotcom There is also solid evidence that dinosaurs evolved on islands, with no migration. Europe was a series of island archipelagos, at least some of which supported dinosaurs. There is even evidence that an island species survived the K-T event and persisted for as long as 2 million more years. You make it way too simplistic. If you do some research on what is actually involved in the extinction process you will quickly find that it is never simple.
@de Sciences must be RE-integrated to look at the WHOLE PICTURE.
If a BASIC CONCEPT is WRONG, it throws everything off. EARTH CHANGED! problem. Pangea didn't spread apart. Earth GREW.
When the continents pulled apart, heat MIGRATED to the oceanic plates and rifts.
Dinosaurs migrated hemispherically, cause it was easy,... as Earth became SEASONAL increasingly. Earth went from sub-tropical, pole to pole, TO ICE AGES!
If some survived on an island 2 MY's. NO METEOR. YOU make it simple.!
@nealadamsdotcom So why did the dinosaurs migrate in the first place? In the modern world it's because of seasonal changes. You say the continental break up triggered seasons. Also, the museum down the street says that Crocodylidaes lived above the Arctic Circle for some 10 m.y. after the K-T event, suggesting that the Earth's climate was still very stable. And saying 1 or 2 island species may have survived the K-T event does not simplify anything, but actually makes it much more complicated.
First question is "Why did ALL Dinosaurs evolve LONG down-facing legs? (Even mammals didn't have LONG legs, like today. Long legs in mammals are there for traveling and migration, within continents."
If you answer 'long legs on dinosaurs have no purpose'. you MUST be incorrect!
Then we have the greatest dinosaur artifact. TRACKWAYS.
Ask yourself, "Why would animals NOT migrate hemispherically, if they CAN, and are adapted to, for the freshest seasonal food?"
@deepashtray - I don't mean to cast asparagus on the museum down the street. But giant crocodillians died off during KT, and I find it hard to believe, although I would not discount the idea that smaller crocodillians lived above the arctic circle. It could be a function of continuously heated water. It does seem odd.
@deepashtray Dinosaurs the size of chickens and dogs migrated as well. Birds migrated. You must look with amazement at a historical memory that causes birds to migrate hemispherically, rather than simply going to Florida for the winter.
@nealadamsdotcom So if the Earth is expanding as you say, and somehow increasing in mass, can you point to any evidence that the bone structure of ancient animals -- any species what so ever -- had less bone mass? What about the density of plant materials, trees? Gravity would have been measurably less than today, which would show up clearly in the fossil record.
@deepashtray On average dinosaurs in all size categories were 2,3 and 4 times bigger, than today's animals. yet their bone densities were exactly the same as today. Some sauropods were as much as 6 times bigger than elephants.
Please, not "expand". Balloons 'expand'. Earth GROWS!
@nealadamsdotcom If it's true, then gravity has been increasing. NASA has conclusively demonstrated that even a slight change in gravity causes changes in bone density; it's a huge issue for space travel. This would be reflected in the structures of the earliest stromatolite and sponge fossils. Stromatolites go back over 3 billion yrs, sponges over 500 mill.. Neither have shown any changes in their physical structure from then until now. What about eggs, shells, coral, trees and plants?
@deepashtray - Pay very close attention. The bone density of a dog, is the same as the bone density of an elephant. In general, bone density is bone density. What you are saying is, NASA has proved that if you take gravity away of a given weight creature, his bone density gets to be less, within his lifetime. A fat man at 600 lbs, had the same bone density as a 110 lb. man. The bone density of a T-Rex, is the same as the bone density of a dog. You can question paleontologists.
@nealadamsdotcom "The bone density of a T-Rex, is the same as the bone density of a dog." This is the position that I am taking. If you are right, then the density of dino bones would be different due to the fact that gravity would be less than today. This would be visible on the macro level, and the micro level within the bone matrix. It would also be obvious in the attachment sights for the muscles and the size of blood vessels due to the less work needed to transport blood. Peace.
@deepashtray - Your supposition makes no sense. Bone density is bone density. You don't get to make up the rules. You contradict your own statement. It doesn't matter how big or small an animal the bone density stays the same. You must think your premise through.
@nealadamsdotcom If I understand this right, you say that the Earth is growing, not just expanding like a balloon. Material is being added to the planet at a volume that actually increases it's size. Is this correct? And are you saying that the gravitational pull of the Earth has not changed from the distant past to the present?
@deepashtray The implications of your question are so pervasive and basic, that speaking them aloud, will give rise to real disbelief and near anger.
Still,..If The Earth grows, and it does,... by extension all large moons, planets, Suns, Solar SYSTEMS, Galaxies and the UNIVERSE GROWS and IS growing,...exponentially. As we recently discovered of the universe
No Pangea! No Big Bang! New matter in common percentages and amounts is created. There is NO OTHER FUNCTION OF THE UNIVERSE BUT TO GROW!
@nealadamsdotcom If all celestial bodies are growing, why is this growth not obvious when measuring their sizes? Also, be attempting to extrapolate from the recent knowledge that the universe as a whole is expanding, that all other celestial bodies are thus growing as well is called the Converse Fallacy of Accident.
@Wrecktapus Because you are such an incredibly short-lived creature as Is our science.
While the Universe is ancient, by any terms.
Still there is clear Knowledge, Suns GROW and get brighter and hotter!
The UNIVERSE is not EXPANDING ( A stupid un-scientific concept) But instead GROWING exponentially. My Animations show Earth's and other bodies GROWTH. Solar Systems (New cells ) Are assembling all the time. HOW clear does it have to Get?
@nealadamsdotcom It's not a question of size but of physics and engineering. Engineers have worked out the speed, stride, weight and bone density of the large dinos, and it fits very nicely with the same studies done on modern animals with modern bone density and structure. Also, the vast majority of dinos were not that big. Some were no larger that a chicken, many the size of a dog or cow. These would not have gone on any epic migration.
@deepashtray - No it doesn't. Any engineer will tell you, a sauropod couldn't exist in this gravity, and a T-Rex would walk, not run, even though a T-Rex's legs were made for running, at a speed of about 75MPH. Many scientists will tell you, he walked at 20MPH. It's a big debate in paleontological circles. Anybody who knows anything about anatomy, like me, will tell you T-Rex ran like the wind. He was built for it. Film producers have been cowed by the scientists into making T-Rexes walk. WRONG.
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
@JoelMcKenzie1 You almost asked a question. That's what it seemed like you were going to do, then POOF you launched into a diatribe. Have you no self-control at all.
I have a "delete" button, and a "block user" button. I'm about to delete. If you don't exhibit self-control, I will simply "block user". YOU decide.
You said migratory animals need long legs, yet bats and swallows have very small legs and are very good at migrating. Are you wrong?
You said pterosaurs became extinct because mountains were too tall to allow them to migrate - couldn't pterosaurs fly around mountains and over sea instead? If so, why are they extinct?
Was every dinosaur impeded by the development of the Mediterranean Sea? If not, why did they disappear worldwide?
@JoelMcKenzie1 Flying Dinosaurs and bats survived BECAUSE they could FLY. BIRDS fly migratory pathways that are beyond sense, when they could merely fly toward the Equator. There is a species MEMORY of hemispheric migration, for hundreds of millions of years!
Mountains don't exist as single entities, but as RANGES. Crossing the Rockies, even in the summer cost the lives of hundreds of new Americans.
Spreading of the Americas,.. spreading of the Australian-Antartican Super-continent
Do you mean pterosaurs, which are not dinosaurs at all?
Bats didn't survive the extinction, they evolved tens of millions of years later from small, short-legged land mammals. This disproves your statement that long legs are neccessary for migration.
Human inability to cross the Rockies means pterosaurs couldn't do the same?
Land animals could migrate from Siberia to equatorial s-e Asia without encountering any ocean - why do dinosaurs not still live there?
How do BATS disprove my statement long legs are necessary for hemispheric Migration? NO MAMMALS migrated hemispherically. EVER. Do bat's migrate seasonally?
Your comment/question was why didn't they go around a mountain? Humans are small mammals and can endure extremes because of their brains and tools.
Pterosaurs have neither. They would die. Dinosaurs migrated from same conditions to same conditions on the opposite hemisphere
Birds are not related to pterosaurs, there physiology is totally different. Birds survived the end Cretaceous event but pterosaurs didn’t. Why? Both could fly, so both could migrate. Why should one group survive but not the other?
Bats are not evident in the fossil record until long after the end cretaceous extinction event.
Mammals are represented in the fossil record for longer than the dinosaurs, so clearly egg predation did not affect dinosaur evolution.
@Aethgeir 1. Feathers. Flying over newly rising mountains Laying eggs on the ground
2. SO?
3.what is THAT point?
4.Reptiles have out-facng legs
5. so what? Point?
6.Large ones are. Evolution had another 60 MY's and a number of ICE AGES.
7.They are superior because they had DOWN-FACING legs and walked on their feet. legs all day so they had aspects of warm-bloodedness and could migrate to all areas of the PLANET.
Mammals migrate WITHIN their hemisphere. (lord, help me.)
@nealadamsdotcom More questions: You state that reptiles survived because they don't migrate - how then do you account for the fact that Sea Turtles are reptiles and migrate?
You have said that reptiles live at the equator, yet here in Australia there are hundreds of species of reptile, and it is not equatorial. Are you wrong?
Many pre-dinosaur reptiles (eg Permian synapsids) also had the sprawling gait of modern reptiles. How do you account for their extinction using the logic in the video?
o, you agree your statement that 'reptiles survived because they don't migrate' is false? That is verbatim from your video.
And that 'reptiles live at the equator' is also false? That is also verbatim from your video.
I do study gaits of palaeozoic reptiles - what is your point here? Do you have any evidence of seasonality during the late permian when the overwhelming fossil evidence indicate widespread arid, desert like conditions and polar glaciation?
@Joel I don't know WHAT you are reading, "Reptiles survived because they DIDN'T MIGRATE. They don't MIGRATE TODAY. They don't have to . THEY LIVE(D) NEAR THE EQUATOR. COULDN'T migrate. Their feet/legs were outfacing.
The weather was sub tropical 200 MYA from pole to pole and there were NO FROZEN POLES. No glaciers, No ice-ages,
You see arid, desert-like conditions, because Earth hadn't evolved grasses.
Seasonality didn't just show up one day, It evolved because heat migrated to the RIFTS
The statment "Reptiles survived because they DIDN'T MIGRATE. They don't MIGRATE TODAY" is wrong, as I have pointed out. You also say "Could it be as simple as that? Yes!". Clearly your idea is not as simple as that, as you have amended and/or added qualifiers in your attempts at answering questions here
Grasses didn't evolve until after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Seasonality has been happening a great deal longer than 200my, and is not dependant on grasses!
@JoelMcKenzie1 - Dear Joel, If you can't take a lesson, I wouldn't visit here if I were you. If you think somebody's impressed, watch how quickly I delete your comment. If you think you have something to say, say it. If it's reasoned, I will respond.
@crabbieappleton Near is NOT connected. Remember, SPAIN Pivoted about 30 degrees as it split off. opening the Bay of Biscay.
Aisa was connected to Australia-Antartica. This was a disaster. Australia Broke from Antarctica about/exactly 60 million Years Ago. And the rift between them now pushes Aus UPWARD.
third: lets think for a minute that Mediterranean Sea did show up in one day to another. If that happened, we would be extint, right? No. a lot would survived. Who? South-East's European dinosaurs and North-East's African dinosaurs were still near-connected. Oh yeah, Europe and Africa, even today, they're connected and these dinosaurs would still be alive cause Mediterranean Sea didn't dividem them. Or the Asian dinosaurs. There's a lot of them that would survive, isn't it?
Not trying to be an ass here but at 01:36 you say that mammals where warm blooded and carried their eggs inside their bodies. Last time I checked mammals don't lay eggs. So what do you mean?
Dondonovan 2 days ago
@Dondonovan Ova are "Eggs" in the Biological sense. as is the Placenta,.. and it is inside the Mothers body,..a significant biological change for survival
nealadamsdotcom 2 days ago
Lots of Mammals and Birds do migrate(warm blooded).Lots of reptils,fishes and insects don't(cold blooded).And vice-versa.On the other hand,newest discoverys point tha Dinossaurs had warm blood and,some,protofeathers.Migration does not explain the extintion for ALL species of Dinossaurs.
12ze34 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@PUMAPUNKU2011 On the other hand, what about the genoflage of the cross-gen antio phlanges type as a control group for intra -grouping of all flages regardless of outside info-metrics? 90% of researchers don't even consider integrating this as an over-riding effect.
nealadamsdotcom 2 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom please?
PUMAPUNKU2011 2 months ago
This makes the most sense i have ever heard!
i am running through your videos, this is amazing.
your putting together some very fundamental pieces of the way reality works; i don't know if your doing this yourself or not, but i am grateful that you have the courage to stand up for a radical idea and share it with others.
IDEA - do you think that it is our own consciousness of "distance" which is creating the plates to separate and water to form on top?
godkingmac 2 months ago in playlist More videos from nealadamsdotcom
@Destroyer4700 You're saying Warm Blooded animals don't MIGRATE? Today, are you saying the animals that migrate are COLD-BLOODED??? Like Crocodiles and Lizards? Someone tell me here, is there a level of stupid beyond JUST PLAIN STUPID? Or is "stupid" an end game.
nealadamsdotcom 2 months ago
Finally someone with a brain Dinosaurs died because of Mother nature not a blast that hit there Earth 65 million yrs ago with the killing power of 1 billion Atom bombs. People should always question and reason everything for themselves.
babykevinxoxo 2 months ago
Comment removed
spenore 3 months ago
@jgbloyd
I am not quite sure if what you are talking about is supposed to make any sense. Anyways, like I said before, we did not know much of anything about diseases before scientific process and technology came around. For example, in the early 1900's, we still believed in female 'hysteria', thinking that a floating uterus caused mental disorders. This has now been scientifically disproved (obviously). Many diseases have also turned from a threat to no threat due to scientific medicine.
StormSquadDotNet 3 months ago
Assuming you're correct, loss of a single migration route wipes out all dinosaurs?
Not to mention the fact that dinos lived on multiple continents...
How does this explain the extinction of the dinos in the disconnected southern hemisphere?
tahunu 3 months ago 6
@tahunu ALL routes were wiped out,.. and it's important to KNOW species were being wiped out,...HALVED each 10 MY from 90 MYA!
Dinosaurs migrated HEMISPHERICALLY,... as only birds now do. They were the same dinosaurs. migrating North to South. WHAT would stop them?
nealadamsdotcom 3 months ago
Interesting. Too many variables, IMHO, to say for certain.
Who knows, maybe some evolved into lizard people the big game were hunted to extinction, like the giant sloth in North America hunted by homo sapiens.
jgbloyd 3 months ago
@SuperTruth77 It wasn't a meteorite. It was Australia tearing away from Antarctica, on the other side of the world. You Americans HAVE TO BELIEVE everything HAD TO happen in YOUR BACK YARD!
nealadamsdotcom 4 months ago
@firejack Some theories has been shown untrue, but it is those same theories that stood as a starting point to then end up with a more correct version later on. Science and theories build upon itself. Also, saying some theories were wrong is to leave out that many theories are right. Thanks to science, we know about gravity, diseases, health hazards...and not to mention we have things like this computer which you are probably using. Thanks science.
StormSquadDotNet 4 months ago in playlist More videos from nealadamsdotcom
@StormSquadDotNet NOTHING to thank MAN'S involvment in science for. We're barely smart enough to see the obvious when it is staring us in the face. Men give each other prizes for noticing what couldn't be more clear if it jumped up and bit us on our face. Our own ignorance and sense of denial of what we see before our eyes holds us back,
Two dino fossils in Museum Nat His of similar creature, one with out-facing legs. One DOWN-FACING, The Museum wonders WHY down-facing legs evolved?
nealadamsdotcom 4 months ago
@StormSquadDotNet You wouldn't know about gravity without science? Really? Diseases? No one understood dis-ease before science? Health hazards? That one is a joke unless you still have faith in the dogma about hygiene.
Computer, there you go. Thing is, no one person really gets out they work. It takes a collective hive of technology all working together. Doesn't mean our theories are correct just because something works.
jgbloyd 3 months ago
@firejack just to clear the air, a theory is not a guess. It is also not given strength by the number of people who believe it. It gains its strength from empirical evidence, being falsifiable, and by making good predictions. Science has an "auto-correct" feature built in by making any "good" theory public, so that it can be reviewed and critiqued by anyone who wants to.
StormSquadDotNet 4 months ago in playlist More videos from nealadamsdotcom
@JamesThWilliams Fancy numbers and ideas but still that's exactly what it is. There is no facts involved. It is not Scientific Law. Scientists don't like to use the word 'guess' cause it implies that their 'theory' could be wrong, where theories by scientist's self definition is true only because it's accepted by a number greater than detractors. It's semantics. There have been hundreds of theories proven wrong with time and experience. But until it has been observed to happen, it is a guess.
firejack007 4 months ago
what about dinasoars in theAmericas
thesolimanz 5 months ago
@HowHighRYa Earth and WATER is matter-atoms. As Earth Grows NEW MATTER is made. Matter is Atoms,,including Hydrogen and Oxygen,
I did not animate the water, just the continental plate. 200 MYA, Two Thirds of the continental plate was covered by shallow seas.
TREES come from SEEDS,...NOT lattitude.
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
(2) A reason why the theory of a meteorite-induced mass extinction exists is because of an iridium rich layer known as the KT boundary globally marking the period of extinction. Meteorites are typically high in the element iridium. Your ‘theory’ fails to explain the mass of other extinctions, and is not supported by what we find in geological records, whereas the current scientific consensus is more consistent with the evidence and has far more explanatory merit.
FactThis 5 months ago
@FactThis You get Iridium from Volcanic activity.
nealadamsdotcom 4 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Iridium concentrations found in the KT boundary are typically too high to be a characteristic of volcanic activity. Plus we have other deposits in the layer, such as tektites, shocked quartz, and a sum of other isotopic anomalies not characteristic of volcanic fallout at all, but of non-terrestrial impact. 'Impact theory' enjoys overwhelming support within the scientific community because of this (even though the comic book artist community may have different ideas...)
FactThis 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FactThis Too late, he already owned you.
jgbloyd 3 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Which volcanoe was responsible for laying down the KT boundary? Also, you didn't answer the question. How does your theory explain the mass extinction, not just of dinosaurs, but of countless other species of plants and animals on the land and in the seas at that time?
mik3anthon3y 3 months ago in playlist More videos from nealadamsdotcom
@nealadamsdotcom Is there evidence of especially high volcanic activity concurrent with the extinction of the dinosaurs?
DannyPhantomBeast 2 months ago in playlist More videos from nealadamsdotcom
@DannyPhantomBeast Actually, if you study the Crustal Age Map I sent you to, you will see that Australia rifted and spread from Antarctica and that rift circumnavigated the whole bottom of the Earth at this very time. I cannot imagime such a world-girding even NOT having incredible volcanic consequences, It beggars any event since the first breakup.
nealadamsdotcom 2 months ago
(1) (1) I hope you realise many other species went extinct along with the dinosaurs between the cretaceous and the tertiary. A great many species of plant, fish and marine lizards, avian species, and some mammals all became extinct relatively abruptly during this period along with most of the dinosaur species. A very large number of species that went extinct in this period WERE NOT migratory, nor could they have been significantly affected by a gradual separation of the continents. (Cont)
FactThis 5 months ago
@FactThis As now Some species of Plants and animals are dependent for their survival on other species.
Seed are deposited in new locations after seasonal migration. Massive Crocidiliand 25 to 35 ft long ate dinosaurs as did other massive shallow sea creatures. For 30 million years dinosaur species dwindled by half and half again.
Did you know this?
Did you know Australia broke free completely from Antarctica about b 60 MYA, with MUCH volcanic activity.
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
gret theory fantastic theogry
SpelKille 5 months ago
You forgot to flame the evil scientists in this video.
This is amazing, do you have a theory about everything?
or are you just posting all your daydreams?
cashdaddyg 5 months ago
@cashdaddyg Yes, I do have a theory of everything. You sort of have to. Everything is connected to everything else. And so once you solve one problem, it leads you to another. And if you don't get them all, you don't get any. Or as the punchline to a great joke goes, it was all one piece.
You can ask questions if you want. I blush to say, I'll have nearly all the answers.
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom
Hmm well we are close to 7 billion ppl on this planet, most of them fell they are right.
everyone is able to make up own theories about everything provided that thay cast aside theories that dont fit into their world weiw.
Now what makes your theories right (and put to mind that thay are theories not "proof")?
notequestion
*did I understand this right? or was you just joking when you said the: "I blush to say" part...?
cashdaddyg 5 months ago
@cashdaddyg 1. HOMEWORK. 2. STICKING TO FACTS! 3.I DON"T LIKE THEORIES.
blush? The answer seems SOOo egotistical. Sorry for that.
Ex: If Dinosaurs Migrated seasonally HEMISPHEREICALLY twice a year. this leads to certain conclusions.
So. first the focus must be on the Planet. If the planet was condusive, why would they NOT?? THEN they ALL must evolve long legs and ALL MIGRATE., Which explains Hemispheric migrations of BIRDS against sense.
On must study ALL science
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom
other scientists also stick to fack and do homework, so the only reason ur theory is valid is that you dont like other theories.
It is a valid theory and ur not the first to sugest it, im just pointing out that ist a theory or if u dont like the word..idea amongst others.
I will also have to disagree on the last part
In m opinion noone is forced to or in need of studying all science,
we must lern from eachother, and that is my opinion wich u can disagree with.
cashdaddyg 5 months ago
@cashdaddyg i made so many spelling errors sorry for that i hope u can read it
cashdaddyg 5 months ago
@cashdaddyg Youtube usually underlines misspelling for you to fix.
Actually, No Most new theories from the scientific community are based, incredible as it seems, ON OTHER Theories.
No, No one MUST study other sciences, but they are DOOMED TO BE WRONG! AND will spend their lives on quests to patch up OTHER BAD SCIENCE! That's what religion is, exactly.
If the Pangea Theory is totally wrong, and it is. How many sad useless papers and books must be re-written to undo all that wrong work?
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
1.35 WHAT? Mammals don't make eggs xD
iacobradu 6 months ago
@nowforfeit HUH? 200 Million Years Ago all the continental land masses were connected into one contiguous crust that completely covered the whole of a smaller Earth. Gravity was 1/4 of what it is today, Air was thin and oxygen rich. Climate was sub-tropical from Pole to pole. There were no mountain ranges to block the free flow of migrations and breezes and the water lay in shallow seas upon the land.
nealadamsdotcom 6 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom ok, so lets just pretend that earth was smaller 200million years ago, like you have force fed on all you other videos. you do realize that wouldn't change the gravity of the earth. the mass of earth is 5.9742 × 1024 kilograms at 12,750 km in diameter. but if the diameter was say 11,000km the mass hasn't changed, thus gravity is the same. and if you think that gravity depends on the size of an object rather then its mass, then your not even worth listening to.
castleslover 6 months ago
@castleslover How could the Earth GROW unless the MASS increased,..magic?...God? Stupid science?
nealadamsdotcom 6 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Matter cannot be created or destroyed. If Earth is growing, then the matter for growth (magma) must already exist within the Earth. Wouldn't that mean that Earth's gravity would be constant throughout your model? If the mass of Earth increased from external matter (comets, asteroids, etc.) then I could see the gravity increasing. Earth can't grow without increase in matter, so where is that matter being created? You leave a lot of big questions unanswered in your assertions.
RockerBug17 6 months ago
@RockerBug17 IF MATTER CANNOT BE CREATED HOW DID WE GET THIS MATTER UNIVERSE?
nealadamsdotcom 6 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Then what started the expansion, Earth is more than 200 milion years old
esbendit 5 months ago
@esbendit It always GREW
nealadamsdotcom 5 months ago
this idea is new to me and its quite sound. interesting
nowforfeit 6 months ago
This video, after great thought, is logical. Logic is good enough for me. Dinosaurs were too big to hunt small animals but small animals were quick and small enough to eat the Dinosaurs eggs. Simple! Birds, a version of dinosaurs, survived because they nested high above the ground, in most cases. Plus, the various rise and falls of the sea heights, divided and separated the land masses isolating certain species. That's good enough for me.
makjac46 7 months ago
Great video.
TheJosh1111111111111 7 months ago
@TheJosh1111111111111 - Thank. you.
nealadamsdotcom 7 months ago
These animations are way cute!!!!!
Anyways though, this theory of extinction doesn't make much sense. The geological change happened so slowly that they would have time to change their migration patterns, or even evolve to cross water. The problem with dinosaurs is that they are too big to be practical. I'm reluctant to say it, but they're better suited to a planet with less gravity. I say they didn't go extinct but just changed. Even mammals descended from dinosaurs.
Yoshi5020 7 months ago
@JPO1618 Without rotating Continents. I would call these "TAGS". But are you simply trying to split hairs and "pick an immature argument"?
nealadamsdotcom 7 months ago
Birds are dinosaurs that survived. If your definition of dinosaur only includes those that went extinct , then it is going to be easy to prove the selective destruction of the dinosaurs fits your theory.
Oh, I thought the land masses didn't rotate during the world expansion - then what is going on with spain?
JPO1618 7 months ago
@JPO1618 Not just Spain, But Alaska. Kamchatka, and Central America. When two continents pull apart,..what you may call TAGS can be pulled by either . As the ocean floor was measured over the years by pole reversals
they discovered Spain revolved by 30˚. It was easy to figure out. As Africa pulled away it ripped open the Bay of Biscay and rotated Spain down. Interesting.
nealadamsdotcom 7 months ago
I Love You Neal !!!
DannyTheSeeker 7 months ago
T-Rex lived on all 7 continents. They too Migrated Hemispherically.
nealadamsdotcom 7 months ago
@TheCopaceticMan Why? Well, You're laughing because you're stupid and like most humans you think that what you KNOW now about the way things are WON'T CHANGE. YOU are too stupid to know or to have learned that everything in science and what we know,..CHANGES with time and all theories and most knowledge changes with time.
Ever ask yourself whycome the dinosaurs that lived in the Northern Hemisphere also seemed to have lived in the southern hemisphere?
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
@TheCopaceticMan - These gigantic shattered hundreds of miles wide and tall, (crustal ages), gave purchase to the only massive subduction on earth. The Ring of Fire. Volcanic upheaval of this event, would so massively eclipse the small force of a meteor impact, that it beggars description.
Sea creature and reptiles fed on migrating dinosaurs. Life forms that become extinct, have impact on other life forms. Flying dinosaurs, (birds) continued, because they migrated in the air. You've failed.
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
@TheCopaceticMan - There are no other "sites". That impact crater is so small as to be a joke, and under water for the most part. I'll tell you something else that's the same age as the extinction event. 60MYA a gigantic rift split Australia from Antarctica. This rift continued & circumnavigated the whole of Antarctica, & from that time, it's the greatest geological rifting & spreading on earth. That spreading drove Australia upward with such force, that it shattered Indonesian oceanic plate.
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
@TheCopaceticMan - 1. Do you realize that mammals history goes back as far a s the dinosaurs, and that of course mammals were egg eaters, and continue to be egg eaters. To imply this is not the case, is ignorance. 2. No other site on the internet, except newer sites, speak of the earth growing. Nor do they speak of the consequences, one of which is the destruction of the dinosaur's pathways. There are no other "sites".
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
70% of life on earth was wiped out at the KT boundary. Not just Dinosaurs. Plants and animals. Various fish and aquatic reptiles where also wiped out. I will say this. Despite the seeming lack of any real scientific degree you have.(And at this point you can't lie and say you have anything resembling a degree or even have had a career in a scientific field) The closetest thing you got to right on this is that before the KT event is that yes there were declining numbers of dinosaurs.
pjt 8 months ago
@pjt pit-stop! Why do, seemingly intelligent people loose the capacity to deduce as they get older? I believe it is the "NEED TO HAVE ANSWERS,...to attach their EGOS TO".
Like "It's a requirement of thinking and presenting revolutionary thought, that you have a degree, when, in fact, logic and deduction would indicate the opposite should be true. Revolution NEVER comes from the inside, merely change.
You must realize that it's a waste of time to talk to you. Your mind is frozen in place.
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom
All human beings in virtually all phases of their lives seem to plateau at a certain level of understanding and get blocked at advancing beyond it because of their inability to unlearn what they were taught and accepted as truth by teachers and/or life experience at formative moments of their lives. They accepted explanations that appeared to "fit the story" from teachers who would seem to know better than themselves, teachers they either trusted, or....
belaghoulashi 3 weeks ago
@belaghoulashi
...teachers they either trusted or who had too much power to challenge. Every teacher is imperfect and teaches from partial understanding. Every explanation we accept in those moments is flawed and incomplete, and generally we do not realize it, because we accept "what works" within that moment of understanding, and absorb the flaws that go along with it without clearly recognizing they are there.
Hope this is clear.
You are a wise man. Keep up the good fight.
belaghoulashi 3 weeks ago
@pjt well to say he has no degree to talk is stupid, very stupid!! You don't need a degree to ask and answer your own questions on subjects that have no proven answers! I found Neals Adams theories just by not buying the plate tectonics theory when trying to explain to my 10year old son and I searched for a better understanding. All the land mass in one place???!!! hmmm... I have a degree in physiotherapy but able to apply my logic to many things....
centaureghan 8 months ago 8
My highest qualification? I figured out how the universe works.
nealadamsdotcom 8 months ago
then what about the migratory dinosaurs that did not cross the mediteranean, or what about those other creatures from that period that did also migrate over that route? shouldn't they have died out as well?
It seems so out of the blue, so... like a fish out of water, and it doesn't explain a whole lot of the other events that went on...
also, talk about backwards reasoning: "Better = extinction" I'll talk it over with the natural scientists at the museum first :3
Raithial 9 months ago
If non-migrating dinosaurs hadn't have died for that reason, then raising gravity would have.
grandpied 9 months ago
@grandpied How could a dinosaur NOT migrate. Seasonal plants die. No fur. Don't burrow. Don't store fat for hard times.lay eggs on the ground to freeze. Makes no sense. WHY wouldn't they migrate. What's stopping them from going to a more favorable place? They have the down-facing legs for it?
nealadamsdotcom 9 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Sorry about that, is what I meant was is that dinosaurs couldn't migrate after Earth grew, and that's what killed them and if that hadn't have then later the greater gravity would have.
grandpied 9 months ago
@grandpied I really doubt that. Had the continents not broken up, the dinosaurs would have evolved, slowly to the increasing gravity. All other species did,..but only the dinosaurs evolved long legs to migrate hemispherically.. THAT was their downfall.
nealadamsdotcom 9 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom There's precedence for your postulation that dinosaurs would have kept up with evolution even if the continents hadn't broken apart while Earth grew thus increasing gravity: at least many species evolved smaller due to at least in part increasing gravity, one to name; giant dragon flies evolved smaller.
grandpied 9 months ago
@grandpied The gravity didn't increase as the world "grew", if any thing it decreased. the centrifugal force is not gravity, it counters gravity hence a larger diameter would decrease the gravity and gravity becomes higher as you get closer to the dense metal core so again a decrease from "growth".
The higher you go the lower the gravity, tho gravity doesn't changes that fast, the gravity in (LE)orbit is about 90% of normal, the weightlessness comes from freefall, not due to lack of gravity.
DOGMA1138 9 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom yes, but....they didn't necessarily migrate, just flourished where favourable conditions existed and died off where they aren't. Your statement makes one wonder why the polar bears don't head to N. Europe where the glaciers and ice flows are thicker....because they don't have the weather channel!!!!
TheyCallMeMrHappy 9 months ago
That's a pretty stupid theory, because the "dinosaurs were better they died".
Us humans are better but our planet is now over populating, expanding the life span, flourishing, only problem now is our ignorance we have for the planet, causing global warming.
AndyWantsSugar 9 months ago
I am almost ashamed of myself for commenting here. My mere acknowledgement of this crazy-ass post gives it a credence that it does not deserve.
For starters, it is incorrect to say that ONLY dino died off at the K-T boundary. Many replites went extinct, too. As did almost all monotremes. Some fish seem to have been affected too. Plus, not all dinos died. Avian dinos survived.
What all the affected populations had in common was egg nests buried in sand. Extinction culprit = acid rain
TheCaz 9 months ago
@TheCaz Awww. Silly post.
1. Reptiles that ate Dinosaurs!
2. Fish ate dinosaurs.
3. Avian could FLY hemispherically,.. and do today.
4 And mammals love eggs. Keep that population up.
nealadamsdotcom 9 months ago
Actually, Dinosaurs evolved into Birds. Especially theropod. Dinosaurs didnt' get extinct, they evolved into birds. the T-Rex had down covering its body (at least the young ones) and the Raptors were feathered. Gradually they reduced its size to improve mobility (therefore, migration) and learned to nest in more intricate places. They also learned to use the feathery for flying (going through gliding first, of course) and developed beaks out of their previously developed teeth.
sentidocomunve 9 months ago
There is no evolution. We got mass extinctions - nothing then the flora and fauna and animals pop out designed for a totally different ecosystem period. Fossil record bears it out - big change and clean breaks with the past. I also suspect we lost a large chunk of the atmosphere in the past and had 100 % extinction. I suspect evidence is in front of us.
Masonictoaster9 10 months ago
...Some carnivorous dinosaurs like the T-Rex for example, migrated to snow covered areas like the outer artic circle area, there is evidence of T-Rex having fur feather like, on it's scaly skin to keep warm!
silversurferss7 10 months ago
@silversurferss7 200 Million years ago, Antarctica was SUB-TROPICAL, COAST TO COAST!
nealadamsdotcom 10 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom .....Yeah, that was 200 million years ago, but towards the end of the T-rex era, (T. rex lived during the late Cretaceous period, about 85 million to 65 million years ago) it got colder. ...T-Rex ventured toward the far Northern parts of the Northern hemisphere, There is evidence from Fossil finds of that.
silversurferss7 10 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom ....Also.....The discovery of numerous species of dinosaurs in the arctic is causing scientists to reconsider old theories about dinosaurs only living in tropical climates. It is now known that many dinosaurs, including Edmontosaurus and Troodon, lived in cold weather climates for at least part of the year. .....Maybe, T-Rex is buried under ice, up there too!
silversurferss7 10 months ago
What got me in this idea is the correlation between the extinction of dinosaurs and the non-extinction of everything else. Is that correct? To me this is a big thing cause it blows away the theory of some comet doing a mass extinction of everything which I've never believed.
firejack007 10 months ago
I say humans killed the dinosaurs. My theory is just as good as yours. We kill those more effectively than anything else on the planet. I am virtually certain we had some large populations in the past and that they must have become very skillful at killing dino's and that's because the the dino's were dangerous and because man liked how they tasted.
gukonni 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gukonni
"I say humans killed the dinosaurs."
No, they did not. Dinosaurs were extinct tens of millions of years before the first monkeys appeared.
There will never be found dinosaur bones in the remains of a caveman's camp fire, or dinosaur images in cave paintings.
mosquitobight 10 months ago
This is by far, the simplest, most ridiculous and most laughable theory I have ever heard in my life.....but it actually makes sense!
Thanks for posting!
freepeoplenow 10 months ago
@freepeoplenow I dont agree that it is laughable but I can see how when we are told the same thing over & over we assume it is absolute fact. I have always thought that most information given about Pangea & dinosaurs etc is based on a collection of small "assumed" facts brought together to make one big theory & if even one of those fact is incorrect then it throws off the theory. I believe we have it mostly right but not necessarily 100% right. These videos make a similar amount of sense to me
phillyvinilli 10 months ago
@phillyvinilli Scientists are contantly found wrong. It also irks me that they and media put out things as absolute fact when it's just a guess.
firejack007 10 months ago 10
The new deep oceans? Yes.
Hemispheric Migration? Yes.
Unfortunately Donosaurs laid their eggs on the GROUND. AND mammals LOVE EGGS. Dwindling populations can't protect eggs, on the ground. Birds like eggs. Shallow seas drain, Giant reptiles guard dwindling shallow Sea pathways. Then there's ONGOING NATURAL DISASTERS. About 60 MYA and Australia broke off from Antarctica, Australian plate crunched into Asian plate shattering it,
If Grazing animals die off their Predators die also,
nealadamsdotcom 11 months ago
cool. I pressume the earth expanding theory is supportive of this new sea.
But this is just one spot in the earth.
are you suggesting rappid earth expansion, creating vast seas, that within a few generations stopped migratory animals from creating a next generation?
I bet SOME dinos would've found a place to put their eggs, even without traversing 5000km to do so.
you got very creative and novel ideas, and great videos, but your theories are never complete..:)
what about atlanis?
superdiza 11 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom 1. Most of the species that went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous, such as foraminiferas, were not dependent on Dinosaurs in any way. 2. Many structural and geomorphic features present in the Alps and Amanos mountain ranges suggest the African and Arabic plate has been converging with the Eurasian plate since the Jurassic. 3. I used caribous to illustrate that one cannot assume mammals did not migrate back then.
4. I agree with your observation. I am not a puppy.
PierreGrondinLeBlanc 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nealadamsdotcom You Wont answer because you Cant answer. Simples...
TacticalAtheist 1 year ago
@TacticalAtheist "Migrate through the air.",......would mean,....birds.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom and pterodactyls! We still have those today too! And no mammal today has to migrate! It's so simple!
dhicks3 11 months ago
@TacticalAtheist KILLED,....every single Dinosaur on Earth,.....EXCEPT for those that could MIGRATE through the air.
Totally MISSED the Mammals and marsupials. Who DID NOT EVER MIGRATE.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
Comment removed
Seedsofthought 1 year ago
@haz020190 - You say meaningless things, for no reason that I can understand. Either find good valid arguments or go home and read a book.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@haz020190 - You don't know what you are talking about. If you have facts, just give them. Read my statements. They are listings of facts. Read yours. They are opinions and speechifying, and not one single fact. Perhaps you cannot read?
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@haz020190 1. This is MY HOUSE. 2. I don't take shite. 3. I don't like stupidity and/or ignorance. Why are you asking about Hadrosaur? It's very hard to follow migrations with so little evidence over so great a time. CLUES! Where are they FOUND? What causes migration? Temperature and food supply.
GRASS in all forms DID NOT EXIST, plants must be fresh and NOT depleted. Earth was evolving SEASONAL PLANTS. While North depleted, South was blossomed.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@haz020190 Ankylosaurs are NOT short and stocky. LOOK AT THEIR BONES before you answer, DAMNIT. PUNK! Then show me someone who knows more about anatomy than ME!
Giraffes have long legs to reach high branches. Evolution works from NEED, and for many reasons( LORD, why am I explaining this elementary shit to this idiot?)
Dinosaurs from No Am are currently found in Antarctica!
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@haz020190 We see their fossils on either side. Short-sighted humans are too stupid to realize that THEN there WEREN'T TWO SIDES! It was ONE,...with increasing seasons. Without changing seasons Long-legged dinosaurs are not needed. Reptiles will do.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@haz020190 On a 1/4 size Earth, with no mountains and unimpeded migration trackways. NOT migrating hemisphere is madness.
Earth was evolving seasonal plants and fruits. There was NO GRASS for minimum survival and they(Dinosaurs laid their eggs on the ground.
ALL had long legs. Why wouldn't they migrate on these massive trackways to warmth and blossoming new food? I don't understand you people.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom in answering your long legs theory.
a) girraffes have the longest legs of any mammal. they do not migrate with the wildebeast
b) look at axamples of ankylosaurs, even ceratopsians. these do not have long legs in proportion to body size.
haz020190 1 year ago
@haz020190 Girraffes are mammals TODAY.
Ankylosaur an Ceratopcids have loong legs. Look at their skeletons. Then look at a reptiles skel.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
Teachers told me that when Dinosaur bones are only found under a certain layer of dust that is not found in our solar system it is of a different galaxy because it has a isotope than the ones found in our galaxy. The dust is from the meteor that hit the earth which, blocked out the sun, The meteor being from that distant galaxy. Those other animals weren't alive in the same time era. Notice how we find fossils from other animals such as fish. How do you think fossil fuels were made.
69MrUsername69 1 year ago
@69MrUsername69 im sorry but a meteor cannot leave an entire galaxy and travel to another. the energy required to escape the gravity of a galaxy would be enormous.
solar system perhaps
haz020190 1 year ago
Neal, I think your theory might fit well with Nassim Haramein's unified field theory. Have you watched any of his videos?
Marleyites 1 year ago
@Marleyites I don't watch Gibberish, sorry.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
GENTS, In order to see, one must have EYES that SEE!
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@Wrecktapus NOT by "making" new matter like Bodies with an "INTERNAL ENGINE.
But they do have" Increasing INTERNAL POWER"! It's called GRAVITY, which increases with size to accrete EX-ternally, and IN-ternally like Geodes.
Large clusters of matter are attracted to join the surface. Single atoms, however can ride the crystal latices to the core to attach and push outward from there. emptying spaces for more atoms
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
not a bad theory...
wiiagent 1 year ago
The Hydridic Earth theory is a theory proposed in 1968 by Soviet geologist Vladimir Larin. The theory contradicts the generally accepted views on the Structure of the Earth. The theory makes certain predictions that can be dismissed or proven through experiments.
niketosho 1 year ago
if this were true not all dinosaurs wold have died in the same period, what about "america"'s dinosaurs? they also died, and of corse there is all the evidence for the asteroid hitting earth.
mauriciohavok 1 year ago
@mauriciohavok Here's a theory for you. A GIGANTIC meteorite crashed on Earth filled with supersonic mission controlled jelly beans with NAMES on them, which sought out only dinosaurs with the right names, and when they tracked the exact right ones down, they crashed through their eyeballs and exploded in their brains.
Bye-Bye Dinobabes. Sweet jellybean dreams.dreams
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom a) there is physical evidence that an asteroid collided with earth 65 million years ago, ever heard of the iridium layer? and b) not only dinosaurs died in that mass extinction, all the water reptiles died, so did the flying reptiles, also millions of different species of plants
mauriciohavok 1 year ago
Rubbish. The are at least a half dozen more plausible theories for the extinction of dinosaurs. Such as a meteor strike.
madraven07 1 year ago
Rubbish! everyone knows the dinosaurs died out because they were too big to fit through the doors of Noah's arc.
voiceofunderstanding 1 year ago
For this to have caused a wide scale extinction event it would have happened over an extremely short period of time, possibly weeks or even days. What evidence do you have to support a time line for this event? How can you assume all dinosaurs were migratory? What about the marine mosasaurs and plesiosaurs that also went extinct. Couldn't they have swam away? And pterosaurs could fly. Were they migratory as well? I suspect you're full of shit.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray You make some very good points. In addition, would all dinosaurs follow transcontinental migratory patterns? Would a geological process as slow as this kill off so many so quickly, and in one event? Given the time frame, wouldn't at least some species adapt their migratory habits? Not to mention the fact many species of mammal do migrate, as do a number of lizard species.
This man makes broad assumptions and ignores far too much, all for the sake of being a contrarian it appears.
FactThis 1 year ago
@deepashtray and Fact This1. Scientists agree it took place over 1 million years. 2. ALL dinosaurs had long legs.
3. The Earth was becoming SEASONAL in climate and seasons mean DEATH!
As Dinosaurs died off Mammals became bolder. and Mammals eat eggs! The fewer the dinosaurs, the bolder the Mammals. The marine dinosaurs in shallow seas fed on migrating dinosaurs. Pterosaurs ate small dinosaurs and couldn't fly over mountains. Why? Too cold and didn't have protection from the cold.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom Weird that I should have insomnia right now. Pterosaurs ate fish. 1 million yrs is plenty of time to adapt to new migration routes, migratory birds (direct descendants of dinos) do it. Long legs would aid migration adaptability. There is documented fossil evidence that at least 1 species of dinosaurs survived on the continent of Antarctica by piling together to hibernate through the winter season under the snow for some 4 months... which shoots the whole seasonal thing down.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray Birds survived. THEY are dinosaurs. Their beaks SEAL against cold and they are covered by feathers, and they don't lay their eggs on the GROUND! They evolved to survive BEFORE it became critical!
THERE IS NO MAGIC!
The reasons the dinosaurs died off is the SAME reasons that they became kings of the Earth, and the reasons that the mammals survived is because they were forced to endure hardship within their evolutionary patterns. FUR, Hibernate..under the ground, live young etc.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom For your "theory" to have even a chance would require a minimum of 2 very unlikely prerequisites. 1) All dinosaur species migrated long distances. 2) All migration routes crossed actively dividing continental plates. It's well documented that the break up of Pangaea, which began 200 mya, led to an explosive diversification of dinosaur species, not their mass extinction. Dr. Robert Bakker argues that the re-connection of land masses is what caused the dinos to go extinct.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray - Dr Baker was given the wrong information by his science fellows, that continents came together. They did not come together, they only pulled apart. How do you make a poor theory? By accepting the stupid theories that other scientists present, adn then building your theory on that.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom There is also solid evidence that dinosaurs evolved on islands, with no migration. Europe was a series of island archipelagos, at least some of which supported dinosaurs. There is even evidence that an island species survived the K-T event and persisted for as long as 2 million more years. You make it way too simplistic. If you do some research on what is actually involved in the extinction process you will quickly find that it is never simple.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@de Sciences must be RE-integrated to look at the WHOLE PICTURE.
If a BASIC CONCEPT is WRONG, it throws everything off. EARTH CHANGED! problem. Pangea didn't spread apart. Earth GREW.
When the continents pulled apart, heat MIGRATED to the oceanic plates and rifts.
Dinosaurs migrated hemispherically, cause it was easy,... as Earth became SEASONAL increasingly. Earth went from sub-tropical, pole to pole, TO ICE AGES!
If some survived on an island 2 MY's. NO METEOR. YOU make it simple.!
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom So why did the dinosaurs migrate in the first place? In the modern world it's because of seasonal changes. You say the continental break up triggered seasons. Also, the museum down the street says that Crocodylidaes lived above the Arctic Circle for some 10 m.y. after the K-T event, suggesting that the Earth's climate was still very stable. And saying 1 or 2 island species may have survived the K-T event does not simplify anything, but actually makes it much more complicated.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray Why migrate?
First question is "Why did ALL Dinosaurs evolve LONG down-facing legs? (Even mammals didn't have LONG legs, like today. Long legs in mammals are there for traveling and migration, within continents."
If you answer 'long legs on dinosaurs have no purpose'. you MUST be incorrect!
Then we have the greatest dinosaur artifact. TRACKWAYS.
Ask yourself, "Why would animals NOT migrate hemispherically, if they CAN, and are adapted to, for the freshest seasonal food?"
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@deepashtray - I don't mean to cast asparagus on the museum down the street. But giant crocodillians died off during KT, and I find it hard to believe, although I would not discount the idea that smaller crocodillians lived above the arctic circle. It could be a function of continuously heated water. It does seem odd.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@deepashtray Dinosaurs the size of chickens and dogs migrated as well. Birds migrated. You must look with amazement at a historical memory that causes birds to migrate hemispherically, rather than simply going to Florida for the winter.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom So if the Earth is expanding as you say, and somehow increasing in mass, can you point to any evidence that the bone structure of ancient animals -- any species what so ever -- had less bone mass? What about the density of plant materials, trees? Gravity would have been measurably less than today, which would show up clearly in the fossil record.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray On average dinosaurs in all size categories were 2,3 and 4 times bigger, than today's animals. yet their bone densities were exactly the same as today. Some sauropods were as much as 6 times bigger than elephants.
Please, not "expand". Balloons 'expand'. Earth GROWS!
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom If it's true, then gravity has been increasing. NASA has conclusively demonstrated that even a slight change in gravity causes changes in bone density; it's a huge issue for space travel. This would be reflected in the structures of the earliest stromatolite and sponge fossils. Stromatolites go back over 3 billion yrs, sponges over 500 mill.. Neither have shown any changes in their physical structure from then until now. What about eggs, shells, coral, trees and plants?
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray - Pay very close attention. The bone density of a dog, is the same as the bone density of an elephant. In general, bone density is bone density. What you are saying is, NASA has proved that if you take gravity away of a given weight creature, his bone density gets to be less, within his lifetime. A fat man at 600 lbs, had the same bone density as a 110 lb. man. The bone density of a T-Rex, is the same as the bone density of a dog. You can question paleontologists.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom "The bone density of a T-Rex, is the same as the bone density of a dog." This is the position that I am taking. If you are right, then the density of dino bones would be different due to the fact that gravity would be less than today. This would be visible on the macro level, and the micro level within the bone matrix. It would also be obvious in the attachment sights for the muscles and the size of blood vessels due to the less work needed to transport blood. Peace.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray - Your supposition makes no sense. Bone density is bone density. You don't get to make up the rules. You contradict your own statement. It doesn't matter how big or small an animal the bone density stays the same. You must think your premise through.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom If I understand this right, you say that the Earth is growing, not just expanding like a balloon. Material is being added to the planet at a volume that actually increases it's size. Is this correct? And are you saying that the gravitational pull of the Earth has not changed from the distant past to the present?
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray The implications of your question are so pervasive and basic, that speaking them aloud, will give rise to real disbelief and near anger.
Still,..If The Earth grows, and it does,... by extension all large moons, planets, Suns, Solar SYSTEMS, Galaxies and the UNIVERSE GROWS and IS growing,...exponentially. As we recently discovered of the universe
No Pangea! No Big Bang! New matter in common percentages and amounts is created. There is NO OTHER FUNCTION OF THE UNIVERSE BUT TO GROW!
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom Well good luck with that. Thank you for your time.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom If all celestial bodies are growing, why is this growth not obvious when measuring their sizes? Also, be attempting to extrapolate from the recent knowledge that the universe as a whole is expanding, that all other celestial bodies are thus growing as well is called the Converse Fallacy of Accident.
Wrecktapus 1 year ago
@Wrecktapus Because you are such an incredibly short-lived creature as Is our science.
While the Universe is ancient, by any terms.
Still there is clear Knowledge, Suns GROW and get brighter and hotter!
The UNIVERSE is not EXPANDING ( A stupid un-scientific concept) But instead GROWING exponentially. My Animations show Earth's and other bodies GROWTH. Solar Systems (New cells ) Are assembling all the time. HOW clear does it have to Get?
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom your are just defending your hipothesis because you want it to be true, here's the deal pal, wanting something doesn't make it real
mauriciohavok 1 year ago
@deepashtray- THANK YOU!!!!
geomorphify 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom It's not a question of size but of physics and engineering. Engineers have worked out the speed, stride, weight and bone density of the large dinos, and it fits very nicely with the same studies done on modern animals with modern bone density and structure. Also, the vast majority of dinos were not that big. Some were no larger that a chicken, many the size of a dog or cow. These would not have gone on any epic migration.
deepashtray 1 year ago
@deepashtray - No it doesn't. Any engineer will tell you, a sauropod couldn't exist in this gravity, and a T-Rex would walk, not run, even though a T-Rex's legs were made for running, at a speed of about 75MPH. Many scientists will tell you, he walked at 20MPH. It's a big debate in paleontological circles. Anybody who knows anything about anatomy, like me, will tell you T-Rex ran like the wind. He was built for it. Film producers have been cowed by the scientists into making T-Rexes walk. WRONG.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@Aethgeir Why are you talking about the mediterranean? North America split from South America.
Australia broke from Asia. Africa from Eurasia.
FAIL, across the board,.. except for monotremes.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
More errors:
- Lizards have 'out-facing legs', 'reptile' is a broader definition that does not necessarily follow that criteria
- The dinosaurs were 'diapsid reptiles'
- Reptiles are not confined to living near the equator.
- There is nothing to suggest that dinosaurs are 'evolutionarily superior' to other reptiles
- Countless mammal species DO migrate.
Aethgeir 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
cadentavaricegrtrj 1 year ago
@JoelMcKenzie1 You almost asked a question. That's what it seemed like you were going to do, then POOF you launched into a diatribe. Have you no self-control at all.
I have a "delete" button, and a "block user" button. I'm about to delete. If you don't exhibit self-control, I will simply "block user". YOU decide.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom Here are some questions then, diatribe-free:
You said migratory animals need long legs, yet bats and swallows have very small legs and are very good at migrating. Are you wrong?
You said pterosaurs became extinct because mountains were too tall to allow them to migrate - couldn't pterosaurs fly around mountains and over sea instead? If so, why are they extinct?
Was every dinosaur impeded by the development of the Mediterranean Sea? If not, why did they disappear worldwide?
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@JoelMcKenzie1 Flying Dinosaurs and bats survived BECAUSE they could FLY. BIRDS fly migratory pathways that are beyond sense, when they could merely fly toward the Equator. There is a species MEMORY of hemispheric migration, for hundreds of millions of years!
Mountains don't exist as single entities, but as RANGES. Crossing the Rockies, even in the summer cost the lives of hundreds of new Americans.
Spreading of the Americas,.. spreading of the Australian-Antartican Super-continent
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom
Flying dinosaurs?
Do you mean pterosaurs, which are not dinosaurs at all?
Bats didn't survive the extinction, they evolved tens of millions of years later from small, short-legged land mammals. This disproves your statement that long legs are neccessary for migration.
Human inability to cross the Rockies means pterosaurs couldn't do the same?
Land animals could migrate from Siberia to equatorial s-e Asia without encountering any ocean - why do dinosaurs not still live there?
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@JoelMcKenzie1 FLYING DINOSAURS....we call them BIRDS.
How do BATS disprove my statement long legs are necessary for hemispheric Migration? NO MAMMALS migrated hemispherically. EVER. Do bat's migrate seasonally?
Your comment/question was why didn't they go around a mountain? Humans are small mammals and can endure extremes because of their brains and tools.
Pterosaurs have neither. They would die. Dinosaurs migrated from same conditions to same conditions on the opposite hemisphere
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom No, birds are not fflying dinosaurs. Birds and dinosaurs shared an ancestry, but are not the same thing, that is far too simplistic.
Bats disprove your statement about migration and long legs because they migrate and have small legs - how is this not clear?
You added the word 'hemispherically' - can you supply one single piece of evidence of hemispheric migration of dinosaurs?
The physiology of pterosaurs isn't known - the comparison to humans makes no sense.
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom A few errors:
Birds are not related to pterosaurs, there physiology is totally different. Birds survived the end Cretaceous event but pterosaurs didn’t. Why? Both could fly, so both could migrate. Why should one group survive but not the other?
Bats are not evident in the fossil record until long after the end cretaceous extinction event.
Mammals are represented in the fossil record for longer than the dinosaurs, so clearly egg predation did not affect dinosaur evolution.
Aethgeir 1 year ago
@Aethgeir 1. Feathers. Flying over newly rising mountains Laying eggs on the ground
2. SO?
3.what is THAT point?
4.Reptiles have out-facng legs
5. so what? Point?
6.Large ones are. Evolution had another 60 MY's and a number of ICE AGES.
7.They are superior because they had DOWN-FACING legs and walked on their feet. legs all day so they had aspects of warm-bloodedness and could migrate to all areas of the PLANET.
Mammals migrate WITHIN their hemisphere. (lord, help me.)
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom More questions: You state that reptiles survived because they don't migrate - how then do you account for the fact that Sea Turtles are reptiles and migrate?
You have said that reptiles live at the equator, yet here in Australia there are hundreds of species of reptile, and it is not equatorial. Are you wrong?
Many pre-dinosaur reptiles (eg Permian synapsids) also had the sprawling gait of modern reptiles. How do you account for their extinction using the logic in the video?
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@JoelMcKenzie1 Sea turtles SURVIVED, Migration alone doesn't kill. PREVENTION of MIGRATION kills.
The equator is not MAGIC. WARMTH is the MAGIC. Slow evolution of the planet as to seasons allowed small reptiles to survive. I am certainl NOT wrong.
Study your gaits. Also the arrival of seasons and the arrival of seasonal plants "dying" in the winter.finished off the Job.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom1. S
o, you agree your statement that 'reptiles survived because they don't migrate' is false? That is verbatim from your video.
And that 'reptiles live at the equator' is also false? That is also verbatim from your video.
I do study gaits of palaeozoic reptiles - what is your point here? Do you have any evidence of seasonality during the late permian when the overwhelming fossil evidence indicate widespread arid, desert like conditions and polar glaciation?
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@Joel I don't know WHAT you are reading, "Reptiles survived because they DIDN'T MIGRATE. They don't MIGRATE TODAY. They don't have to . THEY LIVE(D) NEAR THE EQUATOR. COULDN'T migrate. Their feet/legs were outfacing.
The weather was sub tropical 200 MYA from pole to pole and there were NO FROZEN POLES. No glaciers, No ice-ages,
You see arid, desert-like conditions, because Earth hadn't evolved grasses.
Seasonality didn't just show up one day, It evolved because heat migrated to the RIFTS
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
@nealadamsdotcom
The statment "Reptiles survived because they DIDN'T MIGRATE. They don't MIGRATE TODAY" is wrong, as I have pointed out. You also say "Could it be as simple as that? Yes!". Clearly your idea is not as simple as that, as you have amended and/or added qualifiers in your attempts at answering questions here
Grasses didn't evolve until after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Seasonality has been happening a great deal longer than 200my, and is not dependant on grasses!
JoelMcKenzie1 1 year ago
@JoelMcKenzie1 - Dear Joel, If you can't take a lesson, I wouldn't visit here if I were you. If you think somebody's impressed, watch how quickly I delete your comment. If you think you have something to say, say it. If it's reasoned, I will respond.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
This might make sense if all the world's dinosaurs were in Europe on the day the Mediterranean Sea suddenly appeared....
crabbieappleton 1 year ago
@crabbieappleton Near is NOT connected. Remember, SPAIN Pivoted about 30 degrees as it split off. opening the Bay of Biscay.
Aisa was connected to Australia-Antartica. This was a disaster. Australia Broke from Antarctica about/exactly 60 million Years Ago. And the rift between them now pushes Aus UPWARD.
nealadamsdotcom 1 year ago
third: lets think for a minute that Mediterranean Sea did show up in one day to another. If that happened, we would be extint, right? No. a lot would survived. Who? South-East's European dinosaurs and North-East's African dinosaurs were still near-connected. Oh yeah, Europe and Africa, even today, they're connected and these dinosaurs would still be alive cause Mediterranean Sea didn't dividem them. Or the Asian dinosaurs. There's a lot of them that would survive, isn't it?
sanctuary0o0 1 year ago