783 frames
1:17
Added: 3 years ago
From: GTV911
Views: 1,008
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And from there it can easily seen to be the "dive bomber", too.

  • hey great vid,. and so much clear,.. 5*****

  • Its about time someone found out other then me.

  • "Was that a plane?"

  • It strikes me (scuse the pun) that the perps would have anticipated the DU tip of a penetrator missile coming flying out the other side of WTC2 and thus designed the nose out as cover. The black out was probably necessary cause this was being done on the fly within the broadcast delay. My 2cents

  • Its just too, too fishy that the video flashes to black at a critical point and I find it troubling that if the black frames were inserted purposely, why didn't they just clip a couple of tenths more to eliminate the nose-out theory?

    Perhaps it was impossible to predict the popularity of websites such as youtube in 2001 and the perps had no idea how many of us would be critically inspecting their work. Back then, who would analyze evidence like this nose-out / black out -60 minutes?

    Thx GTV911

  • If indeed it was a 'graphic' only nose-out shot, it would maintain the 'graphic' nose shape of the plane, but it doesn't. The shape changes continously right up until the black-out.

    Thanks again, G.

  • yes

  • of course, it's a dustcloud

  • lol dustcloud

  • I Can't vote 6 stars...

    awesome research!

    thank you G.

  • Thx G

    Legend!!

  • use high quality. just shut up and do it.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more