On December 24,2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead.Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death.His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened.Turns out he was still signed into myspace.She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter.if you don't repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. sorry don't wanna die.....I guess i have to
On December 24,2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead.Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death.His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened.Turns out he was still signed into myspace.She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter.if you don't repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. sorry don't wanna die
son of a bitch we ainth young turks wtf is the name of this show young turks wtf ur turk mothers ass when the turk had a opinion about something they were some son of a bitches fucking animals in my a GOOD turk IS A DEAD TURK the 1 who raises those shit is a bitch ass.
@TeaParty4everandever Wow, you keep busy, don't you? I keep seeing you everywhere! You are a fake. You are not a real Tea Party member, and everyone knows it. Remember what i said!!!!!!! Your acct will be gone in a couple days, and you will try again under some other name, and again you will fail...
I've never heard someone rattle their chops for sooooo long about shit that makes NO difference at all. Even if politics were ran exactly the way Cenk wants....crooked people make crooked systems and does anyone here think there's more good people than bad in the government? Hey Cenk, why not end the fed, investigate 9/11, end the wars, legalize marijuana (and immigration), tar and feather the crooks and start again. That might actually change things.
@potp5150 Immigration is legal. I think you mean to stream line immigration to make the process efficient. As a naturalized citizen myself, I would like to deport all the illegals and streamline the legal immigration process. It shouldn't have taken me 4 months to bring my wife nor should it take 6 years to bring my in-laws.
@potp5150 I agree to an extent. My sentiments are the same as yours, I say abolish this corrupt construct and start anew, but Cenk and many other are for more "practical change". I just find it funny that we criminalize these petty criminals and perpetuate that they are the most dangerous thing to our humanity, but these crooked politicians and financiers who cause massive destruction to humanity and our environment get away with murder with a mere slap on the wrist
@TeaParty4everandever - Nice try. But us real tea party members blame only ourselves for any failures. Plus, personal liberty and freedom (the core beliefs of the tea party) is blind from race, sex and creed.
@TeaParty4everandever WE all know you're a liberal, a Democrat, a fake and not a very good fake. No ome believes you;'re a Tea Party member. Justgo away!
Always remember that when a society more evenly distributes it's wealth => the more all of it's population (the rich and the poor) have a better quality of life. There is an actual study to back this up too.
A corporation has the same rights as a human being, but is infinitely wealthier. When Bush said, "I'm going to do what's right for the American people," he didn't mean you and me; he meant Enron and Halliburton. To him, those were people. (Watch Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room).
I bring this up because my fellow posters are worried about rich people, when they should be far more worried about Corporations, which are more powerful than any rich family will ever be.
continued: to me, a tax on what someone leaves behind is just an unfair way to rob someone after they're dead. The aristocracy and the landbuying my fellow posters are worried about are valid concerns, but I think you guys are missing the forest for the trees. Wealthy families are not the problem. The problem is real, but the land grabbing, wealthy and supremely powerful class is made up of corporations. They are who you have to worry about. continued:
Got a lot of replies when I said I didn't support the estate/inheritance tax... two people said the tax prevents the rise of an aristocracy one guy said it reduces concentrated wealth, one guy said it prevents rich people from buying up all the land.
1. There already is an aristocracy.
2. I see no reason we should limit how wealthy someone can be, and a tax whose sole purpose to do so seems unethical
3. I see no correlation between an estate tax and buying up land.
@jfrsnjhnsn Agreed. But more to the point, our issue is when these corporations are in bed with our government. For example, the US Military protects the oil lines for BP in the middle east. We need to restore the government back to the people for the people. It is also naive to assume that the wealthiest families, via the multi national corporations are not controlling the governments of the world. You should read a book called "None dare call it a conspiracy". It's free online. Google it!
@xardas711 In that case, what do you call the black people and other non-whites who do not like what Obama is doing? You do understand that the race card is illogical.
i worked hard for my money to be passed down to my family so that they will not be poor again.I won't be favorite with take 45% ,35% ,or any percentage for that matter after i die.My inheritance should not be taxed.I pay tax all my fucking life already,u think i wanna give it back to those fuckers.FUCK your concept cenk.It's the most ridiculous policy you;re fighting for.
LMAO xD 42 minutes into the show. And BTW Anna is not here xD idk does ana come later on in the show ? I guess im just stupid i reallly havent wathced that many complete shows of the young turks only the clips they post.
We think of society as a place of rules for each person but what if each person was a society of its own where it can determine what rules it can live by? How much more freedom would we have then?
Great job of deconstructing Mark Williams spew. "they make more $ off of race than any slave trader..." OH MY! I hope this guy falls in a sinkhole.
Funny stuff with Vitter.
The tea party stuff is right on but if you wanna know who the original OG's where that started the bull and how look here. Kibbe. Armey. Ohara. Brunswick Group. Freedomworks. Santelli Rant. Illinois policy institute. It's all in there. and funny.
Cenk is quite funny when he goes into 'inner dialogue mode' in the rachelle Maddow part 30:48 now it would be extra is hilarious is if the studio lights dimmed when his voice softened.
I am glad you are 'going out on a limb' here with the Dems Cenk. I think you speak from the heart, which is why i watch. The girl is sweet too. Heart and soul is what is all about.
Your attitude is right on with this, "Show me the money!"
The "proof is in the pudding", sorry Cenk, you are probably on a diet. Cenk keeps himself chubby so he is not overwhelmingly sexy. Oh yeah! A cha cha cha!
Cenk, you are so good at analyzing both side, a true sign of a genius. Genius isn't really IQ, whatever that means, it is mostly heart and soul. Michael Jordan is a genius of basketball and Cenk is a genius at whatever this is.
Seriously, when we go back back and forth on reform, financial or whatever, isn't the overwhelming paradigm, "DONT LET THE KIDS RUN, OR GUARD THE CANDY STORE?"
Unless we have oversight, that is held accountable to the people, real oversight, they will change the lang
I don't know, is it racists 2 say that the black ppl down south r uneducated? Is it racist to say that black people are better athletes than white ppl even though that is a scientific fact. (Not exactly sure what it is they have that white people don't but it's DEFINITELY a FACT that they DO have SOMETHING that makes them better athletes whether it's evolutionary or whatever)
Now that I think of it though I suppose MOST ppl white OR black sound equally as dumb uneducated and ignorant down south
I think Minorities are held down more extensively in the south than up north. I don't understand it, do they not go to school in south? I live in Ma. and my entire neighborhood is black and NONE of them sound as ignorant or uneducated as the black people down south. I have held out on saying this 4 a LONG time cause I didn't want to make a general statement thats not true but from ALL the evidence I've seen it's hard 2 dismiss.
I love you man. You crack me up. Too bad you are not gay. Not that I am gay, but if YOU were then maybe it would make it easier for me to have fantasies about you. Just something to think about. Maybe you are TV straight and real life gay but that would be confusing for me. I guess I will have to be happy just watching you and laughing and hold those thoughts for another time. Sorry, I am too old for you anyway. And I am not gay anway. not there is anything wrong with it. Cenk=Amy-100lbs! FA!
WOW the letter this guy wrote is SO racist. He is saying that all colored people don't think for themselves don't want to work and want to do nothing but take money. What he DOES understand is that his policy decisions keeps these people in the areas that are hard to live in and other decisions to continually take their money.
EXAMPLE: Bounce checks. If you do, you have to pay 30 dollars. Who bounce checks? ppl who don't have money, therefore we take MORE money from the people who don't have it
In theory, agnosticism can be valid. But in practice, it's a useless as a person who has faith, not knowledge. But even what I said is kind of contradictory. But in stating one is an agnostic leaves open the possibility that there could be a god...and pink unicorns, and leprechauns, etc etc. Why is the plausibility of a god(s) more plausible than a leprechaun? Both ride on the same notion of lack of evidence and are dependent solley on faith. Rather dismiss it altogther.
I've been listening to cenk for a while but he's such a pessimist but that's good for him because he doesn't have to agree with the status quo but he doesn't have to agree with what the left has to say. He just wants a spot on msnbc but I guess that's the only voice we got for now.
I saw Elizabeth Warren speak at UC Berkeley about the collapse of the middle-class back in 2007, she was absolutely brilliant! She is definitely the right person for the job!
TYT are you guys going to call out Ahmadinejad about his latest comments about America being behind the Bombing in Iran and show him and his supporters how logically flawed and counter productive it would be too be behind such a attack.
@turkishxboi First of all it kills brain cells faster than alcohol does. Secondly, it's a gateway drug that ALWAYS leads to harder drugs. Look at the polls.
@CenkIsAdorable ~I have looked at the polls, in no way,shape, or form is weed a gateway drug. And yes it kills brain cells, more than alcohol? i'd like to see some proof on that, i've never heard of such a thing. Even when they teach the effects in school they aren't that drastic, and they are extremely melodramatic about it in schools.
@CenkIsAdorable First of all, weed is never the reason for people to search for harder drugs. people want hard drugs too escape their problems, not too escape POT. this is senseless propaganda and you're either an innocent brainwashed (for lack of a better word) kid or some loser adult who had no social life and still cant think for himself. ALCOHOL destroys everyone, dont even get me started on that.
Too far JR, too far. 2 day suspension is pretty light, but 1-2 weeks most. He didn't start beating him, he didn't do anything beyond slamming the kid. It happens, he's an old man, it doesn't look like this is habitual for him. Being frustrated, and human, shit happens. QQ less.
@BusinessIDBAI How did you discern whether or not that was habitual behavior from the officer?The police are there to service that neighborhood, his actions there only create more of a distrusting attitude towards the local law enforcement which can have extremely damaging consequences for officers and civilians alike. 2 days was too lax, all too many times police get slaps on the wrist in public while being rewarded behind closed doors. 2 weeks is too lax imo. Anyway, lol @ "financial reform"
The guy is obviously well up in years, and I doubt he just recently got onto the force. And especially considering the rate of law suits lately on policy brutality, this guy would have been brought up before if he made a habit of this.
He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe
@BusinessIDBAI If only your logic was sound. . . It doesn't matter if it was "light" or "heavy", you do understand the fact that the police are not allowed to pass a certain physical threshold with anyone not resisting arrest and constrained within handcuffs, right? Your adolescent duck tales of police run ins don't matter. Law enforcement is there to service and protect, not police and abuse. Say the young man's face went through the windshield, or was injured in another way?
@BusinessIDBAI Lol @ me for even debating logically with you. Its very apparent you don't think much at all and aren't conscience enough to realize this is not supposed to happen. It was a severe abuse of power, but your ideology tells you if there was no physical harm there was no foul. I hate to call you out, but you seem like a simpleton. . . This conversation is fruitless, pz
LoL, you are pretty quick to stoop to insults. You haven't employed logic, you're going off pure emotion and you know it. Look at it objectively, you threw out the example of if his face went through the wind shield. Well, in that instance, that'd be a pretty hard slam to break through safety glass then, YES, it's definitely police brutality which requires a firing.
You're flying off the handles because he slammed the kid, relax. You have no evidence he's ever done this before.
@BusinessIDBAI Dude, you're so off base it isn't even humorous. Your first comment summed up was equivalent to "When I was a kid officers slammed me up all the time, this kid got it easy". The conversation is fruitless because your brain can't seem to grasp that any misuse of govt bestowed power is abuse. If my response is based off emotion, I'd say yours is based completely off of ignorance and pride, for you don't seem to comprehend proper protocol nor does your storied past w/ the law matter
@IamtheSamis "disorderly conduct" is one of those BS charges that are only levelled if there is nothing you can actually charge someone with. It is a common charge often translating to "contempt of cop."
Okay, you can't even remember the context of what we were saying, I never said this wasn't an abuse, I said it wasn't a big one, and doesn't deserve a major punishment. And did I say all the time? No, every teenage boy makes mistakes, and some of them get mouthy when they do. Police are people too, stop acting like they have to be angelic, and that this deserves some serious punishment.
He slammed the kid, didn't hit him, shock him or spray him. Cool your emotions.
@BusinessIDBAI I don't like to use the majority as an indicator of what is correct, but thus far you're the only person who took objection to my original comment, yet I've already seen quite a few people who agree with my views on your opinions. You can keep going ad hominem and calling me emotional. . . I suppose in your world that makes you more correct, but unfortunately its not valid. You're the only one here who can't accurately recall the "context" of our original conversation.
@BusinessIDBAI "He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe". This was your original statement, so where did I analyze it wrong? Explain to me how your experience somehow by manner of severity (I'm guessing that is your logic) doesn't make this situation abuse.
The context of my original statement was, yes it is an abuse, no it isn't something horrible. This is WAY blown out of proportion. Your entire point is this deserves what? 1 month unpaid suspension? A firing? What?
Slamming someone means going without food for a month if you made a mistake in judgement when you were heated? Wow, you are so generous! Prevent a man from paying his bills because he got over excited in a situation
@BusinessIDBAI I actually never said you weren't concise. Thanks for putting words in my mouth. How about I'll continue the conversation when you can provide the quote in which I pointed out your lack of conciseness. I'll make this quick for you, you'll find no such quote because you just made it up to give yourself a platform to continue debating me. Not only are you misinformed on the issues, but you're a liar too.
No, the problem was, I misread you saying conscience. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it.
You're basically coming from the position, that because he lost his temper to a couple of teenagers, and slammed a kid on the hood, that he deserves some serious punishment which renders him broke? I could COMPLETELY agree if he had tased him, or pepper sprayed him, or punched him, or slapped him, or did something other than slamming the kid. Where am I misinformed?
@BusinessIDBAI So if you misread and thought I wrote conscience when I actually wrote concise why did you say and I quote, "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?". To myself and everyone else with basic reading comprehension skills it would seem you were addressing a matter of conciseness and not of conscience. What you just did was blatantly lie and your own post proves it. What does the number of post I made have to do with conscience? You didn't misread anything. . .
LoL, dude, a simple misreading, is a simple misreading. That's what happened. You seem more apt to jump to ad hominem attacks because I don't agree with your position. I stated, I think firing the guy is too much, when JR said he might fire him if it was his call. I think 1 month unpaid suspension is too much.
I think 2 weeks is extreme, but fine go ahead and give it to him for two weeks. Losing a week's pay check is a BIG deal. But you'd rather call me a liar than address that.
@BusinessIDBAI Its no longer ad hominem when the person's character you're attacking has actually done something questionable worth being examined. Funny that I was the first one stating your tactic of calling me emotional as ad hominem and now you're turning that argument against me. . Genius ( -_-)
Despite your squirming you still haven't explained why if you thought I wrote conscience your reply instead dealt with the length of my rebuttal which relates to conciseness. That isn't misreading
@BusinessIDBAI My point seems to be going over your head, but I'll break this down for you. A few replies ago I made 3 post during a rebuttal to one of your replies. You then wrote "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?". This statement relates to the length of my reply, but the thing was I never said you weren't concise. You then stated that you misread and thought I wrote "conscience", but of this were the case why would you attack the # of comments I made instead of the substance?
My GOD you love sticking on that, I misread, I admitted my mistake, I didn't continue saying it, but you wanna keep dragging it on. I haven't done anything questionable in a misreading. It's solely ad hominem and is the EXACT same tactic with see used by conservative politicians and Fox News.
I'm not still raging on you about "lying" about you commenting first. Get over it.
@BusinessIDBAI Lastly, I'm no longer debating your opinion on what the severity of the officer in question punishment should be. We can agree to disagree on that, my largest issue with you aside from you lying about the whole "Concise/Conscience" fiasco are the statements you made about your encounters with law enforcement as a child and how they relate to this situation. Your belief that this was light and you received more sever as a child so we should just get over it ideology.
Most of your "rebuttals" consist of personal insults. I don't respond to them, as its not an actual form of debate.
I related my teenage experiences because it is similar. Things happen, teenagers have mouths on them, and many of us actually tried to get the police angry. If you have a problem with that, show how it isn't similar.
And quit trying the ad hominem attacks! You're like a five year old, learn to debate! Got to college, it'd be awesome.
@BusinessIDBAI You're full of it. The first insult was made after my initial reply. I didn't make any personal attacks and all you could say in return was that I was emotional and get over it. In fact you didn't even begin to use the phrase "ad hominem" until after I accused you of using such tactics. Lastly, I already proved how you lied, you didn't admit anything. If you thought I said conscience instead of concise you would have spoke about me not being conscience. Instead →↑
@BusinessIDBAI instead you accused me of being too long winded which myself and everyone else who understand the English language would know deals with the length of a statement. You saying you misread it doesn't make sense because your reply doesn't add up to this claim. What does "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" have to do with consciousness? If you misread why would you reply in this manner? Anyway, I'm done. Others have already called you out and now I'm done too
You are long winded, if I misread conscience for concise then THAT is why I would respond to that. You haven't proved shit, and you've gone so far off the deep end with recognizing you have no points, that you just wanna talk about some manufactured lie. Get over yourself.
If you have NO points to bring to the table, then you're done. I win, if you disagree with my position, but your only debate tactic is to attack, then you're done, you're gone.
@BusinessIDBAI You must think everyone here is illiterate. All one has to do is look at how or dialouge started. I made perfectly valid points with no personal attacks whatsoever and what was your response? "He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe". Wow, what a sophisticated argument you make
@BusinessIDBAI You're a liar and your own statements prove it. "No, the problem was, I misread you saying conscience. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI If this is the case then why did you then reply ""Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI. Are you too stupid to see how that doesn't add up?If you thought I said conscience (which I did) then why would reply speaking about conciseness? That would in fact mean that misread
The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience. Are you too stupid to comprehend that statement?
@BusinessIDBAI If you are literate you would see and acknowledge how you own statements prove you a liar. Here goes some homework for you. Define CONSCIENCE and CONCISE. Then apply them to what I wrote in the first paragraph. To save you the effort and time, if you really thought I wrote conscience you wouldn't have made the first statement I quoted. Read it for yourself, you defense doesn't make any sense. You wrote about me not being concise, but you claim you thought it read conscience. . .
@BusinessIDBAI Once again I will prove with your own words how you are lying. The issue is that you claimed I accused you of being non - CONCISE. "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI - Your claim was proven false so then you said "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI - So if you thought I said conscience why did you make the first statement I quoted?
@BusinessIDBAI "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -
"No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn't your reply match
Can you explain why I would speak about consciousness if I thought you said I wasn't concise? It's pretty funny you're talking about literacy when you don't notice how your accusation is self-contradictory. As I said, and as you quoted, I misread you saying conscience, reading it as concise.
You sir, still go ahead and continue to lie, staying what, 1-2 days ago that you're done with this conversation? And you lied about me responding to you to start this whole thing. Projection.
And further more, you're showing your inability to read: "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn't your reply match - IamtheSamis -
Read that again, notice your error in comprehension.
@BusinessIDBAI "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
You forgot to paste this one along with it like I did earlier. You know, your original excuse that proves me correct. The quote you're using to make my claims look inaccurate is the second excuse you used after I debunked the first one. I posted it along with my reply below to display how many times you excuse has changed. They are all your quotes
@BusinessIDBAI "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -"No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Next time use all 3 quotes together like I did. The 2nd quote proves my point. Give up, dude
@BusinessIDBAI Lastly, even if this is one large misunderstanding the issue lies in how you worded yourself. "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
What you should have written was "I misread you saying concise". After I proved I didn't call you non - concise you switched to conscience which is why I keep using "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI. Now I retire. . .
No, me saying I misread you saying conscience was saying I misread what you wrote, as you were asking me where you said Concise. Remember the context of the post I was replying to, it was you asking me where you had said concise, so I went and looked and you were correct, and I had misread, so I pointed out WHERE and WHAT I had misread. The rest has been your failing, not mine.
And STILL! You've been saying you quit for days now, continuing the lie. You're a hypocrite for calling my mistake a lie, and constantly so, when you made the bigger mistake of saying I responded to you to start this all off.
And STILL! You're going down the path of Red Herring, trying to drag the debate away from the police abuse. Maybe you should become a conservative politician, you have all the debate tactics.
@BusinessIDBAI concise for conscience, but the only problem there is that I never said you weren't concise. Which goes back to my original statement of you either you lying totally or not knowing the definition of conscience and concise respectively. So which is it? I just proved with your own statements that you didn't misread anything. You claim you thought I said you're not conscience, but in your reply you don't address that at all. You just talk about me not being concise. I smell a liar.
You REALLY wanna drag this out don't you? Trying to make a non-issue into an issue? Have you ever mistook something someone said and acted what you incorrectly perceived? I guess not, well, we have a new Jesus, perfect in every way!
How many times have you said you're done? Yet here you are. A liar in every way, not only did you lie saying I responded to you, but you lied about leaving. Wow, the lack of honesty is amazing. Perhaps this is all projection on your part?
@BusinessIDBAI Actually don't waste your finger muscles. You have no actual answers, your only rebuttal is that I'm emotional. Rather not waste my time though I find it ironic you started our debate, have been using caps, and seem to know a lot about emotions, but claim I'm the emotional one. . . Think you're self projecting a bit, but I'll try not to judge you too harshly
And furthermore, is your entire "debate" tactic ad hominem attacks? Let your arguments stand for what their merits, stop with the name calling, leave that to the children.
@BusinessIDBAI Unlike you I can admit a mistake. I checked and I did reply to your statement first. So I apologize for recalling incorrectly, that still doesn't change the fact that quite a few people here seem to think you're off base. Lastly you started with the insults. I made a valid point and instead of a valid reply you insisted that I was being emotional and I should get over it? That has pretty much been your stance the entire conversation, yet you're the only one using caps every reply
hey, give me $10K. i wanna play in the World Series of Poker. Oh, wait, since I'm holding your savings, already got it. Thanks. (each and every one bank exec has been doing this now for a long time, just add a bunch of zeros)
The banks still have the right to do that...ain't that great.
USA has NO Capitalism, USA HAS Corporatism/Fascism.
USA has NO Democracy, USA HAS Plutocracy.
USA has NO Constitution, USA HAS Patriot Act, Drones, Blackwater, False Flag Attacks & Lies.
USA has NO Politicians/Reps, USA ONLY HAS Neocon Zionist Corporate Lobbyists working ONLY for Corporations, Fed Reserve, "Business Roundtable" & AIPAC/PNAC/CFR
USA has NO Political Parties, USA ONLY HAS NEOCONS & AIPAC IN DC AND NEOCONS, ZIONISTS & CEO's IN POWER.
Elizabeth Warren WAS the logic choice. The WH advisors, Geithner, Emmanuel, make me very angry. Was Obama aiming at bipartisanship when he chose them? Or is he more a Clintonian D than he let on while campaigning?
I already dropped out of the Democratic Party to join the WFP. Don't know what, if Obama doesn't chose Warren to head the Consumer Protection agency, or how, to speak out against these Corporate Dems.
Guess I could back far-right candidates, hopes they screw things up more.....??
@bobbytiger ........yes we get it.......Mr Ted Kennedy ACCIDENTALLY killed someone in a car accident. By the way how long ago did Laura Bush kill that guy Michael Douglas in a car accident?...oh right, it was 47 years ago,...Bush (Welch at the time) was also presumably drunk as well.....What's your fuckin point?
Regarding Tea Party Racism, as an original Ron Paul Tea Party member, I can tell you that our group's agenda has nothing to do with race. Our core principals are for limited government, less taxes (or no taxes!), less government spending and against crony capitalism (business in bed with government). There is no agenda of race. We have people of all races and are prone to be libertarians, not democrats nor republicans. I disapprove of Obama, not because he is black, but what he stands for.
@satarnag Forgot to mention that we are also for individual freedom and liberty! Which is the core reason why we, as a movement, can't be racists. Do racism exist with individual persons within any group, such as the NAACP? Sure, but the spin by the media is to state that we are made up of Republican racists members.
No one said as a movement you are racists. We are saying as a movement aimed at demonizing government when the head of the government is a half black guy, you attract the white racist element of the society more than any other movement.
@mengwise36 One must be very ignorant to think that we disapprove of Obama (and Bush's) policy because of their skin color. Should any of these idiots show up, it is made known by us true party members that they are not welcomed.
Also, I am of neither party. I was the original Ron Paul tea party. Now the tea party somehow got hijacked by the conservatives. If they only knew we were against Bush's bail outs and Patriot Act.
I speak of the tea party of today, after the hijack if you want to distance yourself.
Just because you personally do not disapprove of Obama because of his skin, does not mean other people in your party are not racists. The so called "Tea Party Movement" might have borrowed something from Ron Paul but really started after Obama took office.
Speaking of ignorance, the whole "Tea Party" theme is rather ignorant of history. The Boston Tea Party was about profit, not tax.
You will need to get rid of the Federal Reserve to have true banking reform. Don't forget, the system is working as planned. Regarding estate tax, it should be eliminated all together. The money I made has already been taxed. Why does my son need to get taxed again when he inherits it? Also, I think it is very stupid for someone to state that the rich should pay more taxes to build bridges simply because they are rich.
@BOZ11 Because we are all equal and free. Why should I pay at a higher tax rate simply because I make more? Is it fair for me to pay into the government at a higher rate than you because I simply make more? Ideally, I would like to get rid of the IRS. However, if the IRS must exists, there should be either a small flat tax that is equal to all people.
Regarding estate tax, why should your son, as a individual, make free money just because he was born your son? Aren't you for individual responsibilities? If you ask me, the money you make should ALL be spent by you. The best thing you can do for you son is to teach him how to make the same money as you.
Progressive taxation is not stupid. It is what made this country great once.
@mengwise36 Because I already paid taxes on it. If he were to gain access to tax deferred investment vehicles, then he should be taxed on those items should he withdraw from it. However, he should not pay taxes on assets that I already paid taxes on. In regards to "Progressive taxation is not stupid. It is what made this country great once" comment, keep in mind that the IRS came to be in the early 1900's. We were already a great nation by then.
Unless you somehow take over your son's body after you die, he is a different individual, correct? If you give your money (after tax) to another individual, it is a income to that individual, correct? Why should that income, which he is earning solely because he is your son, different from his other incoming? Not to mention, he is getting 7 million tax free as it is.
IRS did come in 1913 with the 16th amendment. However, progressive taxation was used during the civil war.
@ProduceCrack It's a marching band song. They play it almost everywhere at parades, sporting events, etc. I think it's called "It's a grand old flag".
Of course Williams can see how black people would take his comments. But he doesn't care. His base is white racists. He is putting out the message his base wants to hear.
i love this show, and great job cenk, but the idea of this estate tax is not a great idea. yes you bring up a good point, but that is the great thing about earning your money is being able to do with it what you want. trust me, im with you most of the time cenk, but if a person decides to give money for the better use in our infrastructure, thats great, but if they chose not to, then thats their right. you cant completely fault someone for leaving the money they earned to their family thats fine
cenk who are you kidding your never gonna give up on obama its been way passed time to realize hes just another ball playing politician and whoever we had pciked wouldnt have really mattered
and yes cute kid goodjob id feel a little more dickish then usual if i didnt admit it
cenk, anyone ever say you have way too much faith in people? of course beck meant it
Goldman Sachs owns the Fed? When will it be announced that America is now a Plutocracy?
Covering Glen Beck gives that dunce free advertising.
*I thought the Tea Party is made up of all colours. Black Tea, Green tea, White Tea, Jasmine Tea, Chamomile Tea, Old English Tea, Irish Tea, Breakfast Tea. you get the idea.
*Bad Police. Fine and anger management with 12month probation. Now don't let me see you in this court house unless its for giving out fines. You're making our dirty job, look dirty.
What a dickhead, stop this stupid show..
Creactivee 2 weeks ago
What
Mslisa051 4 weeks ago
This was the worst video I ever saw in my life.
eyeoftiger101 3 months ago
On December 24,2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead.Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death.His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened.Turns out he was still signed into myspace.She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter.if you don't repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. sorry don't wanna die.....I guess i have to
godfather973 3 months ago
On December 24,2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead.Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death.His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened.Turns out he was still signed into myspace.She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter.if you don't repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. sorry don't wanna die
ChizMahPants 8 months ago
@ChizMahPants your such a faggot
slobonmyknob31 8 months ago
@slobonmyknob31 LOL I just did it for tickles and giggles XD
ChizMahPants 8 months ago
i only click on this vids because TYT makes me think of mamaries
sorry
4042516 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch''`Movies'~;Online"'~Here~`;
ＷＷＷ.ＷＡＴＣＨＦＵＬＬＭＯＶＩＥＳ５.ＴＫ
COPY.;'THE;;,URL;`'ABOVE.'`
LinoWinklerSwartz 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
get bbw now for chat naneedj.info
darshi48 10 months ago
Ahhhhhhh july 16 iz me birthday lolz
miley1betty 1 year ago
TheYoungTurks my msn in profile! TYT Hour - July 16th, 2010
sexykatie90 1 year ago
Bence Allahsiz mutluluk yok siz ne dersiniz bilmem . Allaha emanet olun .
np33123 1 year ago
Nekadar Musluman sin bilmem ama Turk oldu icin Masa Allah
np33123 1 year ago
@np33123 musluman olup olmaması seni niye bu kadar ilgilendiriyor , bizim insanımız olması yeterli
kertenkeleci 1 year ago
Cenk kardes Masa Allah cok akilli sin boyle bir show yapmak icin cok tilki gibi olman lazim . Agizana saglik.
np33123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
son of a bitch we ainth young turks wtf is the name of this show young turks wtf ur turk mothers ass when the turk had a opinion about something they were some son of a bitches fucking animals in my a GOOD turk IS A DEAD TURK the 1 who raises those shit is a bitch ass.
MrBagelis7 1 year ago
@MrBagelis7 I think this may be the stupidest most uncompromisable youtube comment I have ever seen. CONGRATULATIONS
guitarfreak8900 1 year ago
@guitarfreak8900 Make that two. LMAO!
enkeksinickia 1 year ago
@enkeksinickia Make that three. lol
dillzer12 1 year ago
@dillzer12 I know, it´s amazing! Almost poetic...
enkeksinickia 1 year ago
@TeaParty4everandever Wow, you keep busy, don't you? I keep seeing you everywhere! You are a fake. You are not a real Tea Party member, and everyone knows it. Remember what i said!!!!!!! Your acct will be gone in a couple days, and you will try again under some other name, and again you will fail...
umadumLib 1 year ago
excellent analysis
jsymons1985 1 year ago
I've never heard someone rattle their chops for sooooo long about shit that makes NO difference at all. Even if politics were ran exactly the way Cenk wants....crooked people make crooked systems and does anyone here think there's more good people than bad in the government? Hey Cenk, why not end the fed, investigate 9/11, end the wars, legalize marijuana (and immigration), tar and feather the crooks and start again. That might actually change things.
potp5150 1 year ago
@potp5150 Immigration is legal. I think you mean to stream line immigration to make the process efficient. As a naturalized citizen myself, I would like to deport all the illegals and streamline the legal immigration process. It shouldn't have taken me 4 months to bring my wife nor should it take 6 years to bring my in-laws.
satarnag 1 year ago
@potp5150 I agree to an extent. My sentiments are the same as yours, I say abolish this corrupt construct and start anew, but Cenk and many other are for more "practical change". I just find it funny that we criminalize these petty criminals and perpetuate that they are the most dangerous thing to our humanity, but these crooked politicians and financiers who cause massive destruction to humanity and our environment get away with murder with a mere slap on the wrist
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@TeaParty4everandever - Nice try. But us real tea party members blame only ourselves for any failures. Plus, personal liberty and freedom (the core beliefs of the tea party) is blind from race, sex and creed.
satarnag 1 year ago
buy my book! haa thats awesome
mrncy227 1 year ago
@TeaParty4everandever WE all know you're a liberal, a Democrat, a fake and not a very good fake. No ome believes you;'re a Tea Party member. Justgo away!
TAMPADOC64 1 year ago
Idiots November can't come soon enough
bigchrisdom24 1 year ago
Always remember that when a society more evenly distributes it's wealth => the more all of it's population (the rich and the poor) have a better quality of life. There is an actual study to back this up too.
smacdon 1 year ago
A corporation has the same rights as a human being, but is infinitely wealthier. When Bush said, "I'm going to do what's right for the American people," he didn't mean you and me; he meant Enron and Halliburton. To him, those were people. (Watch Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room).
I bring this up because my fellow posters are worried about rich people, when they should be far more worried about Corporations, which are more powerful than any rich family will ever be.
jfrsnjhnsn 1 year ago
continued: to me, a tax on what someone leaves behind is just an unfair way to rob someone after they're dead. The aristocracy and the landbuying my fellow posters are worried about are valid concerns, but I think you guys are missing the forest for the trees. Wealthy families are not the problem. The problem is real, but the land grabbing, wealthy and supremely powerful class is made up of corporations. They are who you have to worry about. continued:
jfrsnjhnsn 1 year ago
Got a lot of replies when I said I didn't support the estate/inheritance tax... two people said the tax prevents the rise of an aristocracy one guy said it reduces concentrated wealth, one guy said it prevents rich people from buying up all the land.
1. There already is an aristocracy.
2. I see no reason we should limit how wealthy someone can be, and a tax whose sole purpose to do so seems unethical
3. I see no correlation between an estate tax and buying up land.
continued:
jfrsnjhnsn 1 year ago
@jfrsnjhnsn Agreed. But more to the point, our issue is when these corporations are in bed with our government. For example, the US Military protects the oil lines for BP in the middle east. We need to restore the government back to the people for the people. It is also naive to assume that the wealthiest families, via the multi national corporations are not controlling the governments of the world. You should read a book called "None dare call it a conspiracy". It's free online. Google it!
satarnag 1 year ago
anyone who criticizes what dear leader Obama is doing is a fucking hateful racist
xardas711 1 year ago
@xardas711 I hope you're being sarcastic.
xAtheistAlexeix 1 year ago
no, im serious
xardas711 1 year ago
@xardas711 In that case, what do you call the black people and other non-whites who do not like what Obama is doing? You do understand that the race card is illogical.
satarnag 1 year ago
i worked hard for my money to be passed down to my family so that they will not be poor again.I won't be favorite with take 45% ,35% ,or any percentage for that matter after i die.My inheritance should not be taxed.I pay tax all my fucking life already,u think i wanna give it back to those fuckers.FUCK your concept cenk.It's the most ridiculous policy you;re fighting for.
sesshoumaru3st 1 year ago 2
@sesshoumaru3st Thank U...U put it with the fervor I needed!
funkateerkitty 1 year ago
LMAO xD 42 minutes into the show. And BTW Anna is not here xD idk does ana come later on in the show ? I guess im just stupid i reallly havent wathced that many complete shows of the young turks only the clips they post.
MirkotheGreat 1 year ago
We think of society as a place of rules for each person but what if each person was a society of its own where it can determine what rules it can live by? How much more freedom would we have then?
timbosforporn 1 year ago
Great job of deconstructing Mark Williams spew. "they make more $ off of race than any slave trader..." OH MY! I hope this guy falls in a sinkhole.
Funny stuff with Vitter.
The tea party stuff is right on but if you wanna know who the original OG's where that started the bull and how look here. Kibbe. Armey. Ohara. Brunswick Group. Freedomworks. Santelli Rant. Illinois policy institute. It's all in there. and funny.
jasondylan.wordpress
highkarate 1 year ago
Cenk is quite funny when he goes into 'inner dialogue mode' in the rachelle Maddow part 30:48 now it would be extra is hilarious is if the studio lights dimmed when his voice softened.
CmdrTobs 1 year ago
Nice Nice congrats Maximus is a great name i love my name maximilliano im sure he will love his its freakin cool man
missionkid 1 year ago
CONGRATS ON LITTLE P.MAX
mykmmc 1 year ago
I am glad you are 'going out on a limb' here with the Dems Cenk. I think you speak from the heart, which is why i watch. The girl is sweet too. Heart and soul is what is all about.
Your attitude is right on with this, "Show me the money!"
The "proof is in the pudding", sorry Cenk, you are probably on a diet. Cenk keeps himself chubby so he is not overwhelmingly sexy. Oh yeah! A cha cha cha!
highkarate 1 year ago
Cenk, you are so good at analyzing both side, a true sign of a genius. Genius isn't really IQ, whatever that means, it is mostly heart and soul. Michael Jordan is a genius of basketball and Cenk is a genius at whatever this is.
Seriously, when we go back back and forth on reform, financial or whatever, isn't the overwhelming paradigm, "DONT LET THE KIDS RUN, OR GUARD THE CANDY STORE?"
Unless we have oversight, that is held accountable to the people, real oversight, they will change the lang
highkarate 1 year ago
I don't know, is it racists 2 say that the black ppl down south r uneducated? Is it racist to say that black people are better athletes than white ppl even though that is a scientific fact. (Not exactly sure what it is they have that white people don't but it's DEFINITELY a FACT that they DO have SOMETHING that makes them better athletes whether it's evolutionary or whatever)
Now that I think of it though I suppose MOST ppl white OR black sound equally as dumb uneducated and ignorant down south
upplsuckimcool16 1 year ago
I think Minorities are held down more extensively in the south than up north. I don't understand it, do they not go to school in south? I live in Ma. and my entire neighborhood is black and NONE of them sound as ignorant or uneducated as the black people down south. I have held out on saying this 4 a LONG time cause I didn't want to make a general statement thats not true but from ALL the evidence I've seen it's hard 2 dismiss.
upplsuckimcool16 1 year ago
i am a raging liberal with ortho weed killer products.
nvaspider 1 year ago 2
Glenn Beck is such an idiot that even Billo the clown can't help mocking him.
MaryJesusJoseph 1 year ago
DUDE!!! This is bullshiznit this is the second day in a row that no new videos were put up...
upplsuckimcool16 1 year ago
I love you man. You crack me up. Too bad you are not gay. Not that I am gay, but if YOU were then maybe it would make it easier for me to have fantasies about you. Just something to think about. Maybe you are TV straight and real life gay but that would be confusing for me. I guess I will have to be happy just watching you and laughing and hold those thoughts for another time. Sorry, I am too old for you anyway. And I am not gay anway. not there is anything wrong with it. Cenk=Amy-100lbs! FA!
highkarate 1 year ago
Tim Geitner: Dead wrong. Yep.
erinmichaelfinney 1 year ago
WOW the letter this guy wrote is SO racist. He is saying that all colored people don't think for themselves don't want to work and want to do nothing but take money. What he DOES understand is that his policy decisions keeps these people in the areas that are hard to live in and other decisions to continually take their money.
EXAMPLE: Bounce checks. If you do, you have to pay 30 dollars. Who bounce checks? ppl who don't have money, therefore we take MORE money from the people who don't have it
upplsuckimcool16 1 year ago
The Rachel Maddow "Looking like a woman" and "a long time ago" were both funny comments. Id give them a break on those.
GorgonLuvs8008135 1 year ago
I like the way the old guy licks his lips in the wheat thins commercial.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
It's so cute. Cenk always says 'god bless', even though he's an atheist.
Domzdream 1 year ago
@Domzdream He's an Agnostic, actually.
StinkyCheeser 1 year ago
@StinkyCheeser Actually, he said he's an atheist recently. I don't remember the video, but he said that.
LtShock 1 year ago
@StinkyCheeser
In theory, agnosticism can be valid. But in practice, it's a useless as a person who has faith, not knowledge. But even what I said is kind of contradictory. But in stating one is an agnostic leaves open the possibility that there could be a god...and pink unicorns, and leprechauns, etc etc. Why is the plausibility of a god(s) more plausible than a leprechaun? Both ride on the same notion of lack of evidence and are dependent solley on faith. Rather dismiss it altogther.
Domzdream 1 year ago
the rachel maddow part was hilarious
bigrodneyakatrey 1 year ago
Sorry cenk was it Pessimust Maximus Cyugurt. Congratulations!
feote911 1 year ago
I've been listening to cenk for a while but he's such a pessimist but that's good for him because he doesn't have to agree with the status quo but he doesn't have to agree with what the left has to say. He just wants a spot on msnbc but I guess that's the only voice we got for now.
feote911 1 year ago
I saw Elizabeth Warren speak at UC Berkeley about the collapse of the middle-class back in 2007, she was absolutely brilliant! She is definitely the right person for the job!
painintheauss 1 year ago
TYT are you guys going to call out Ahmadinejad about his latest comments about America being behind the Bombing in Iran and show him and his supporters how logically flawed and counter productive it would be too be behind such a attack.
MeoithTheSecond 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jundullah carried out the bombings in Iran & Jundullah is SUPPORTED BY THE CIA. Ahmadinejad CORRECTLY said the CIA was behind the bombings...
geopoliticalmonitor. com/ex-cia-agent-confirms-us-ties-with-jundullah-1
youtube. com/watch?v=Xy0DY6D9-uI
sourcewatch. org/index. php?title=Jundullah
blogs.abcnews. com/theblotter/2007/04/abc_news_exclus.html
payvand. com/news/09/jun/1092.html
pakalert.wordpress. com/2009/02/07/saudis-and-cia-back-khalid-sheikh-mohammads-jundullah-in-pakistan-and-iran
halcyon0830 1 year ago
Pot warps the minds of our children and weakens the resolve of our allies
CenkIsAdorable 1 year ago
@CenkIsAdorable it warps the minds of our children? hows that?
turkishxboi 1 year ago
@turkishxboi First of all it kills brain cells faster than alcohol does. Secondly, it's a gateway drug that ALWAYS leads to harder drugs. Look at the polls.
CenkIsAdorable 1 year ago
@CenkIsAdorable ~I have looked at the polls, in no way,shape, or form is weed a gateway drug. And yes it kills brain cells, more than alcohol? i'd like to see some proof on that, i've never heard of such a thing. Even when they teach the effects in school they aren't that drastic, and they are extremely melodramatic about it in schools.
turkishxboi 1 year ago
@CenkIsAdorable First of all, weed is never the reason for people to search for harder drugs. people want hard drugs too escape their problems, not too escape POT. this is senseless propaganda and you're either an innocent brainwashed (for lack of a better word) kid or some loser adult who had no social life and still cant think for himself. ALCOHOL destroys everyone, dont even get me started on that.
Thoreos 1 year ago
@Thoreos lol I know I was just kddin
CenkIsAdorable 1 year ago
@CenkIsAdorable no you werent lol
Thoreos 1 year ago
Too far JR, too far. 2 day suspension is pretty light, but 1-2 weeks most. He didn't start beating him, he didn't do anything beyond slamming the kid. It happens, he's an old man, it doesn't look like this is habitual for him. Being frustrated, and human, shit happens. QQ less.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI How did you discern whether or not that was habitual behavior from the officer?The police are there to service that neighborhood, his actions there only create more of a distrusting attitude towards the local law enforcement which can have extremely damaging consequences for officers and civilians alike. 2 days was too lax, all too many times police get slaps on the wrist in public while being rewarded behind closed doors. 2 weeks is too lax imo. Anyway, lol @ "financial reform"
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
The guy is obviously well up in years, and I doubt he just recently got onto the force. And especially considering the rate of law suits lately on policy brutality, this guy would have been brought up before if he made a habit of this.
He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI If only your logic was sound. . . It doesn't matter if it was "light" or "heavy", you do understand the fact that the police are not allowed to pass a certain physical threshold with anyone not resisting arrest and constrained within handcuffs, right? Your adolescent duck tales of police run ins don't matter. Law enforcement is there to service and protect, not police and abuse. Say the young man's face went through the windshield, or was injured in another way?
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Lol @ me for even debating logically with you. Its very apparent you don't think much at all and aren't conscience enough to realize this is not supposed to happen. It was a severe abuse of power, but your ideology tells you if there was no physical harm there was no foul. I hate to call you out, but you seem like a simpleton. . . This conversation is fruitless, pz
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
LoL, you are pretty quick to stoop to insults. You haven't employed logic, you're going off pure emotion and you know it. Look at it objectively, you threw out the example of if his face went through the wind shield. Well, in that instance, that'd be a pretty hard slam to break through safety glass then, YES, it's definitely police brutality which requires a firing.
You're flying off the handles because he slammed the kid, relax. You have no evidence he's ever done this before.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI U STILL Don't SLAM Somebody's face into the hood!
Damn There wasn't any threat there...The Cop was just bein a dik!
U don't abuse Ur power...Simple...U Just DON'T doit!
What if that was Ur 17 yr-old son he did that to?
Or Ur wife?
It was wrong and he should be punished for at least a month...but I would've fired him because he caused so much harm to the Force.
funkateerkitty 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI So...U Fire HIM & I bet the next cop is going to think before he slams somebody into a car's hood!
Police should be honored and loved and trusted to protect us...
After all...They have "The Right" to kill us at any given moment & they could get away with it! So we must take care who it is we hire for policemen.
I say "The Right" only because they have this kind of power.
funkateerkitty 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Dude, you're so off base it isn't even humorous. Your first comment summed up was equivalent to "When I was a kid officers slammed me up all the time, this kid got it easy". The conversation is fruitless because your brain can't seem to grasp that any misuse of govt bestowed power is abuse. If my response is based off emotion, I'd say yours is based completely off of ignorance and pride, for you don't seem to comprehend proper protocol nor does your storied past w/ the law matter
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis "disorderly conduct" is one of those BS charges that are only levelled if there is nothing you can actually charge someone with. It is a common charge often translating to "contempt of cop."
rifter0x0000 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
Okay, you can't even remember the context of what we were saying, I never said this wasn't an abuse, I said it wasn't a big one, and doesn't deserve a major punishment. And did I say all the time? No, every teenage boy makes mistakes, and some of them get mouthy when they do. Police are people too, stop acting like they have to be angelic, and that this deserves some serious punishment.
He slammed the kid, didn't hit him, shock him or spray him. Cool your emotions.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI I don't like to use the majority as an indicator of what is correct, but thus far you're the only person who took objection to my original comment, yet I've already seen quite a few people who agree with my views on your opinions. You can keep going ad hominem and calling me emotional. . . I suppose in your world that makes you more correct, but unfortunately its not valid. You're the only one here who can't accurately recall the "context" of our original conversation.
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI "He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe". This was your original statement, so where did I analyze it wrong? Explain to me how your experience somehow by manner of severity (I'm guessing that is your logic) doesn't make this situation abuse.
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?
The context of my original statement was, yes it is an abuse, no it isn't something horrible. This is WAY blown out of proportion. Your entire point is this deserves what? 1 month unpaid suspension? A firing? What?
Slamming someone means going without food for a month if you made a mistake in judgement when you were heated? Wow, you are so generous! Prevent a man from paying his bills because he got over excited in a situation
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI I actually never said you weren't concise. Thanks for putting words in my mouth. How about I'll continue the conversation when you can provide the quote in which I pointed out your lack of conciseness. I'll make this quick for you, you'll find no such quote because you just made it up to give yourself a platform to continue debating me. Not only are you misinformed on the issues, but you're a liar too.
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
No, the problem was, I misread you saying conscience. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it.
You're basically coming from the position, that because he lost his temper to a couple of teenagers, and slammed a kid on the hood, that he deserves some serious punishment which renders him broke? I could COMPLETELY agree if he had tased him, or pepper sprayed him, or punched him, or slapped him, or did something other than slamming the kid. Where am I misinformed?
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
Comment removed
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI So if you misread and thought I wrote conscience when I actually wrote concise why did you say and I quote, "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?". To myself and everyone else with basic reading comprehension skills it would seem you were addressing a matter of conciseness and not of conscience. What you just did was blatantly lie and your own post proves it. What does the number of post I made have to do with conscience? You didn't misread anything. . .
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
LoL, dude, a simple misreading, is a simple misreading. That's what happened. You seem more apt to jump to ad hominem attacks because I don't agree with your position. I stated, I think firing the guy is too much, when JR said he might fire him if it was his call. I think 1 month unpaid suspension is too much.
I think 2 weeks is extreme, but fine go ahead and give it to him for two weeks. Losing a week's pay check is a BIG deal. But you'd rather call me a liar than address that.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Its no longer ad hominem when the person's character you're attacking has actually done something questionable worth being examined. Funny that I was the first one stating your tactic of calling me emotional as ad hominem and now you're turning that argument against me. . Genius ( -_-)
Despite your squirming you still haven't explained why if you thought I wrote conscience your reply instead dealt with the length of my rebuttal which relates to conciseness. That isn't misreading
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI My point seems to be going over your head, but I'll break this down for you. A few replies ago I made 3 post during a rebuttal to one of your replies. You then wrote "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?". This statement relates to the length of my reply, but the thing was I never said you weren't concise. You then stated that you misread and thought I wrote "conscience", but of this were the case why would you attack the # of comments I made instead of the substance?
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
My GOD you love sticking on that, I misread, I admitted my mistake, I didn't continue saying it, but you wanna keep dragging it on. I haven't done anything questionable in a misreading. It's solely ad hominem and is the EXACT same tactic with see used by conservative politicians and Fox News.
I'm not still raging on you about "lying" about you commenting first. Get over it.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Lastly, I'm no longer debating your opinion on what the severity of the officer in question punishment should be. We can agree to disagree on that, my largest issue with you aside from you lying about the whole "Concise/Conscience" fiasco are the statements you made about your encounters with law enforcement as a child and how they relate to this situation. Your belief that this was light and you received more sever as a child so we should just get over it ideology.
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
Most of your "rebuttals" consist of personal insults. I don't respond to them, as its not an actual form of debate.
I related my teenage experiences because it is similar. Things happen, teenagers have mouths on them, and many of us actually tried to get the police angry. If you have a problem with that, show how it isn't similar.
And quit trying the ad hominem attacks! You're like a five year old, learn to debate! Got to college, it'd be awesome.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI You're full of it. The first insult was made after my initial reply. I didn't make any personal attacks and all you could say in return was that I was emotional and get over it. In fact you didn't even begin to use the phrase "ad hominem" until after I accused you of using such tactics. Lastly, I already proved how you lied, you didn't admit anything. If you thought I said conscience instead of concise you would have spoke about me not being conscience. Instead →↑
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI instead you accused me of being too long winded which myself and everyone else who understand the English language would know deals with the length of a statement. You saying you misread it doesn't make sense because your reply doesn't add up to this claim. What does "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" have to do with consciousness? If you misread why would you reply in this manner? Anyway, I'm done. Others have already called you out and now I'm done too
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
You are long winded, if I misread conscience for concise then THAT is why I would respond to that. You haven't proved shit, and you've gone so far off the deep end with recognizing you have no points, that you just wanna talk about some manufactured lie. Get over yourself.
If you have NO points to bring to the table, then you're done. I win, if you disagree with my position, but your only debate tactic is to attack, then you're done, you're gone.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI You must think everyone here is illiterate. All one has to do is look at how or dialouge started. I made perfectly valid points with no personal attacks whatsoever and what was your response? "He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I've been slammed on the ground, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn't traumatic, it's not that big of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe". Wow, what a sophisticated argument you make
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
Comment removed
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI You're a liar and your own statements prove it. "No, the problem was, I misread you saying conscience. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI If this is the case then why did you then reply ""Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI. Are you too stupid to see how that doesn't add up?If you thought I said conscience (which I did) then why would reply speaking about conciseness? That would in fact mean that misread
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience. Are you too stupid to comprehend that statement?
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI If you are literate you would see and acknowledge how you own statements prove you a liar. Here goes some homework for you. Define CONSCIENCE and CONCISE. Then apply them to what I wrote in the first paragraph. To save you the effort and time, if you really thought I wrote conscience you wouldn't have made the first statement I quoted. Read it for yourself, you defense doesn't make any sense. You wrote about me not being concise, but you claim you thought it read conscience. . .
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BusinessIDBAI Once again I will prove with your own words how you are lying. The issue is that you claimed I accused you of being non - CONCISE. "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI - Your claim was proven false so then you said "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI - So if you thought I said conscience why did you make the first statement I quoted?
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -
"No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn't your reply match
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
Can you explain why I would speak about consciousness if I thought you said I wasn't concise? It's pretty funny you're talking about literacy when you don't notice how your accusation is self-contradictory. As I said, and as you quoted, I misread you saying conscience, reading it as concise.
You sir, still go ahead and continue to lie, staying what, 1-2 days ago that you're done with this conversation? And you lied about me responding to you to start this whole thing. Projection.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
And further more, you're showing your inability to read: "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn't your reply match - IamtheSamis -
Read that again, notice your error in comprehension.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
You forgot to paste this one along with it like I did earlier. You know, your original excuse that proves me correct. The quote you're using to make my claims look inaccurate is the second excuse you used after I debunked the first one. I posted it along with my reply below to display how many times you excuse has changed. They are all your quotes
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI "The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience." - BusinessIDBAI -"No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
But you didn't speak about consciousness↓
"Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI
Next time use all 3 quotes together like I did. The 2nd quote proves my point. Give up, dude
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Lastly, even if this is one large misunderstanding the issue lies in how you worded yourself. "No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn't making up. Get over it." - BusinessIDBAI
What you should have written was "I misread you saying concise". After I proved I didn't call you non - concise you switched to conscience which is why I keep using "Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I'm not concise?" - BusinessIDBAI. Now I retire. . .
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
No, me saying I misread you saying conscience was saying I misread what you wrote, as you were asking me where you said Concise. Remember the context of the post I was replying to, it was you asking me where you had said concise, so I went and looked and you were correct, and I had misread, so I pointed out WHERE and WHAT I had misread. The rest has been your failing, not mine.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
And STILL! You've been saying you quit for days now, continuing the lie. You're a hypocrite for calling my mistake a lie, and constantly so, when you made the bigger mistake of saying I responded to you to start this all off.
And STILL! You're going down the path of Red Herring, trying to drag the debate away from the police abuse. Maybe you should become a conservative politician, you have all the debate tactics.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI concise for conscience, but the only problem there is that I never said you weren't concise. Which goes back to my original statement of you either you lying totally or not knowing the definition of conscience and concise respectively. So which is it? I just proved with your own statements that you didn't misread anything. You claim you thought I said you're not conscience, but in your reply you don't address that at all. You just talk about me not being concise. I smell a liar.
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
You REALLY wanna drag this out don't you? Trying to make a non-issue into an issue? Have you ever mistook something someone said and acted what you incorrectly perceived? I guess not, well, we have a new Jesus, perfect in every way!
How many times have you said you're done? Yet here you are. A liar in every way, not only did you lie saying I responded to you, but you lied about leaving. Wow, the lack of honesty is amazing. Perhaps this is all projection on your part?
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
Comment removed
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
Comment removed
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Actually don't waste your finger muscles. You have no actual answers, your only rebuttal is that I'm emotional. Rather not waste my time though I find it ironic you started our debate, have been using caps, and seem to know a lot about emotions, but claim I'm the emotional one. . . Think you're self projecting a bit, but I'll try not to judge you too harshly
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
@IamtheSamis
And furthermore, is your entire "debate" tactic ad hominem attacks? Let your arguments stand for what their merits, stop with the name calling, leave that to the children.
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
@BusinessIDBAI Unlike you I can admit a mistake. I checked and I did reply to your statement first. So I apologize for recalling incorrectly, that still doesn't change the fact that quite a few people here seem to think you're off base. Lastly you started with the insults. I made a valid point and instead of a valid reply you insisted that I was being emotional and I should get over it? That has pretty much been your stance the entire conversation, yet you're the only one using caps every reply
IamtheSamis 1 year ago
Comment removed
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago
hey, give me $10K. i wanna play in the World Series of Poker. Oh, wait, since I'm holding your savings, already got it. Thanks. (each and every one bank exec has been doing this now for a long time, just add a bunch of zeros)
The banks still have the right to do that...ain't that great.
882me 1 year ago
USA has NO Capitalism, USA HAS Corporatism/Fascism.
USA has NO Democracy, USA HAS Plutocracy.
USA has NO Constitution, USA HAS Patriot Act, Drones, Blackwater, False Flag Attacks & Lies.
USA has NO Politicians/Reps, USA ONLY HAS Neocon Zionist Corporate Lobbyists working ONLY for Corporations, Fed Reserve, "Business Roundtable" & AIPAC/PNAC/CFR
USA has NO Political Parties, USA ONLY HAS NEOCONS & AIPAC IN DC AND NEOCONS, ZIONISTS & CEO's IN POWER.
Biggest LIE EVER: "USA is Land of the Free"
halcyon0830 1 year ago
Elizabeth Warren WAS the logic choice. The WH advisors, Geithner, Emmanuel, make me very angry. Was Obama aiming at bipartisanship when he chose them? Or is he more a Clintonian D than he let on while campaigning?
I already dropped out of the Democratic Party to join the WFP. Don't know what, if Obama doesn't chose Warren to head the Consumer Protection agency, or how, to speak out against these Corporate Dems.
Guess I could back far-right candidates, hopes they screw things up more.....??
882me 1 year ago
Fuck politicians...ALL POLITICIANS. Take that message any way you like...
Monbrax 1 year ago
It's July 18, 2010.
Happy anniversary Ted Kennedy.
It's now been exactly 41 years since Kennedy drowned Mary Jo in the Chappaquiddick River in Mass., after trying to drive home drunk.
Bad luck.
After he killed Mary Jo, he had to walk the rest of the way.
RIP you phucker.
bobbytiger 1 year ago
@bobbytiger ........yes we get it.......Mr Ted Kennedy ACCIDENTALLY killed someone in a car accident. By the way how long ago did Laura Bush kill that guy Michael Douglas in a car accident?...oh right, it was 47 years ago,...Bush (Welch at the time) was also presumably drunk as well.....What's your fuckin point?
snarnold1 1 year ago
30:50 - Epic! Classic Cenk dropping that elbow from the top rope.... XD
danisageeza 1 year ago
Well let's face it, i have a surprisingly large orange penis
CPhockeyplayer 1 year ago
@CPhockeyplayer This isn't /b/. Nobody cares what your hog looks like.
Tokopol 1 year ago
Regarding Tea Party Racism, as an original Ron Paul Tea Party member, I can tell you that our group's agenda has nothing to do with race. Our core principals are for limited government, less taxes (or no taxes!), less government spending and against crony capitalism (business in bed with government). There is no agenda of race. We have people of all races and are prone to be libertarians, not democrats nor republicans. I disapprove of Obama, not because he is black, but what he stands for.
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag Forgot to mention that we are also for individual freedom and liberty! Which is the core reason why we, as a movement, can't be racists. Do racism exist with individual persons within any group, such as the NAACP? Sure, but the spin by the media is to state that we are made up of Republican racists members.
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag
No one said as a movement you are racists. We are saying as a movement aimed at demonizing government when the head of the government is a half black guy, you attract the white racist element of the society more than any other movement.
mengwise36 1 year ago
@mengwise36 One must be very ignorant to think that we disapprove of Obama (and Bush's) policy because of their skin color. Should any of these idiots show up, it is made known by us true party members that they are not welcomed.
Also, I am of neither party. I was the original Ron Paul tea party. Now the tea party somehow got hijacked by the conservatives. If they only knew we were against Bush's bail outs and Patriot Act.
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag
I speak of the tea party of today, after the hijack if you want to distance yourself.
Just because you personally do not disapprove of Obama because of his skin, does not mean other people in your party are not racists. The so called "Tea Party Movement" might have borrowed something from Ron Paul but really started after Obama took office.
Speaking of ignorance, the whole "Tea Party" theme is rather ignorant of history. The Boston Tea Party was about profit, not tax.
mengwise36 1 year ago
@satarnag
So you are part of the Tea Party Federation and not a part of the Tea Party Express?
mengwise36 1 year ago
You will need to get rid of the Federal Reserve to have true banking reform. Don't forget, the system is working as planned. Regarding estate tax, it should be eliminated all together. The money I made has already been taxed. Why does my son need to get taxed again when he inherits it? Also, I think it is very stupid for someone to state that the rich should pay more taxes to build bridges simply because they are rich.
satarnag 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@satarnag "I think it is very stupid for someone to state that the rich should pay more taxes" - i don't believe u have any solid arguments for this
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 Because we are all equal and free. Why should I pay at a higher tax rate simply because I make more? Is it fair for me to pay into the government at a higher rate than you because I simply make more? Ideally, I would like to get rid of the IRS. However, if the IRS must exists, there should be either a small flat tax that is equal to all people.
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag the playing field is not even, therefore taxation needn't be.
BOZ11 1 year ago
@satarnag
No argument that the FED should be abolished.
Regarding estate tax, why should your son, as a individual, make free money just because he was born your son? Aren't you for individual responsibilities? If you ask me, the money you make should ALL be spent by you. The best thing you can do for you son is to teach him how to make the same money as you.
Progressive taxation is not stupid. It is what made this country great once.
mengwise36 1 year ago
@mengwise36 Because I already paid taxes on it. If he were to gain access to tax deferred investment vehicles, then he should be taxed on those items should he withdraw from it. However, he should not pay taxes on assets that I already paid taxes on. In regards to "Progressive taxation is not stupid. It is what made this country great once" comment, keep in mind that the IRS came to be in the early 1900's. We were already a great nation by then.
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag
Unless you somehow take over your son's body after you die, he is a different individual, correct? If you give your money (after tax) to another individual, it is a income to that individual, correct? Why should that income, which he is earning solely because he is your son, different from his other incoming? Not to mention, he is getting 7 million tax free as it is.
IRS did come in 1913 with the 16th amendment. However, progressive taxation was used during the civil war.
mengwise36 1 year ago
wat song was that at 1:26 ?
ProduceCrack 1 year ago
@ProduceCrack It's a marching band song. They play it almost everywhere at parades, sporting events, etc. I think it's called "It's a grand old flag".
satarnag 1 year ago
@satarnag I believe it is called Fanfare...
funkateerkitty 1 year ago
@funkateerkitty Thanks
satarnag 1 year ago
Of course Williams can see how black people would take his comments. But he doesn't care. His base is white racists. He is putting out the message his base wants to hear.
adavidpirtle 1 year ago
i love this show, and great job cenk, but the idea of this estate tax is not a great idea. yes you bring up a good point, but that is the great thing about earning your money is being able to do with it what you want. trust me, im with you most of the time cenk, but if a person decides to give money for the better use in our infrastructure, thats great, but if they chose not to, then thats their right. you cant completely fault someone for leaving the money they earned to their family thats fine
green49285 1 year ago
cenk who are you kidding your never gonna give up on obama its been way passed time to realize hes just another ball playing politician and whoever we had pciked wouldnt have really mattered
and yes cute kid goodjob id feel a little more dickish then usual if i didnt admit it
cenk, anyone ever say you have way too much faith in people? of course beck meant it
narezul 1 year ago
Cenk is a Stargate fan...!!! :)
SuPeRBoB2701 1 year ago
hey TYT remind me on friday or ill forget
kevinleeisme 1 year ago
name your kid Glenn Beck if you want to see the shit get kicked out of him at school XD
TAz69x 1 year ago
Why no 16:9 HD TYT?
AndresUppsala1 1 year ago
Oh my god! 47 minutes!?
Bossentuppen 1 year ago
Cenk.
On Monday's summary, I expect a full report on Obamas latest vacation experience, (this one to Maine), and,
the FEC ordering Biden's campaign to pay the "government" $219,000 for its "recordkeeping errors".
Thanks.
bobbytiger 1 year ago
our version of the truth? so why is tyt version of truth better than those others? why do you want to convince other people if only stories excist?
erdal0 1 year ago
Ahh he has that new father glow
DouglasASean 1 year ago
Been watching...
Feeling the big love!
leeroynaggins 1 year ago
Goldman Sachs owns the Fed? When will it be announced that America is now a Plutocracy?
Covering Glen Beck gives that dunce free advertising.
*I thought the Tea Party is made up of all colours. Black Tea, Green tea, White Tea, Jasmine Tea, Chamomile Tea, Old English Tea, Irish Tea, Breakfast Tea. you get the idea.
*Bad Police. Fine and anger management with 12month probation. Now don't let me see you in this court house unless its for giving out fines. You're making our dirty job, look dirty.
WhereIsTheExit 1 ye