Added: 2 years ago
From: physicsandreason
Views: 12,394
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (138)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • OR SUM :)

  • @thesobeck, found by scientists and experts, ITS A FACT!!, Tell nist to Prove there THEORY or 1% of it ? Loll U believe nist THEORY over PHYSICS/FACTS !!

  • @Headshothorror4488 yeah tell him/her! but its sad that most people are still so ignorant.

  • @SUNNYRAINWIND There are also agents whom control many online personas that go around to online forums,blogs etc, just to disprove and sway the public mind.They write their responses in a way that they effect the mind of whoever reads their bs.It is all over ,tv,newspapers,magazines,here, and everywhere.It is psychological, they know how our brains and minds work which is why the sheeple are so ignorant to the truth.TIME TO WAKE UP NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @dawatcher9 Very true.

  • @dawatcher9 at least I really thinkso and I am sure allot more agree.

  • @SUNNYRAINWIND OPEN YOUR EYES !!! EVIL FUX ARE GOING DOWN FASTER THAN THEIR TOWERS THEY BUILT AND YES THEY WERE BUILT TO FALL IT IS IN THEIR SATANIC BELIEFS. THOSE 2 TOWERS REPRESENT SOMETHING IN THEIR BS BELIEFS BUT THEY ARE FINISHED ! 2 CHANNELS THAT ARE NEARLY IDENTICAL BOTH TRYING TO DISCREDIT TRUTH, THEY FEAR TRUTH LOVE AND LIGHT I KNOW THEM BETTER THEN THEY KNOW THEMSELVES YOU CANT HIDE IN DARKNESS WHEN LIGHT SHINES AT YOU BITCHES OR IS IT A.I. DEEPTHOUGHT ? I SMELL FEAR I SENSE FEAR !!!!

  • @dawatcher9 Yes :]

  • This is my favourite of all the hitler parodies.....LOL!

    Awesome!

  • Read the book ‘Where did the towers go?’ by Dr Judy Wood. Forget thermite, mini nukes, controlled demolition and jet fuel. The facts are that two half million ton buildings ‘fell’ faster than the speed of gravity and turned to dust before hitting the deck should arouse some suspicion. Far lower than they should have been seismic records do not lie, and those towers should have destroyed the bathtub wall that keeps out the Hudson river. Guess again.

  • Someone show me a link to the evidence for nano-thermite dust at Ground Zero. No one has yet to show me any evidence that would even close to substantiate this claim.

  • @TheSobek Since I cannot type a link, copy and paste the following key words: " Active Thermitic Material Discovered " It should be noted that in order for this evidence to be reliable, you must trust the chain of custody in regards to how the samples were obtained. IE. trust that Steven Jones and his crew did not just create these samples in a lab and pretend that they found it. Message me if you wanna see a video on youtube showing small quantities of thermate cutting large steel beams.

  • A journey into the mind of an actual "9/11 falser"

    watch?v=4A7fgg1vjTQ

  • Really well done

  • don't know when to use who or whom

  • @BecuzIt "Who do you call he?" "Whom do you call him?"

  • Osama Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI in connection with 911. FACT!

  • I never thought an Untergang parody vid could be so informative.

    It is a common theory that the Nazis were behind in part behind the Reichstag fire. At least they didn't fail so hard as to make it dead obvious to anyone with half a brain that they were bullshitting, at least. Just a simple fire, and blame the Dutchman 100%.

  • VIDEO PROOF OF THERMATE CUTTING THROUGH INCH-THICK STEEL

    ------

    haaha--try posting the following youtube link in a comment box and see what happens... """"*************""""/watch?v=­5+d+5+i+I+o+C+i+I+8+g"""******­******""""""" ( remove the +s between the numbers and letter of the link --i had to add them in order to post it)

  • this is real quotes from hitler ? wow to think, they had nanothermite back then ...

  • nice job physicsandreason

  • notice how the truth movement regards themselves as Nazis

    funny ho physicsandreason uses the term "free fall" when it doesn't exist in natural conditions on earth.

    plus his avoidence of talking about WTC collapse which debunks the truth movement

  • lol!!!

  • Flanksteak..bin laden denied involvement in 911 atleast twice after it occured..it wasn't until much later that suspicious videos, that supposedly indicated him saying they were involved ,came out..take a look at the bin ladens in those videos and and then try to explain why he is looking younger in some then others..why his nose is different shapes..why he is wearing gold rings which are against his religion..the translations have also been debated so the videos are not proof.

  • thanks for creating this. It was long over due.

  • nein eleven was a nazi job!

  • Don't forget, the day before 9/11 they announced 2,300,000,000,000 (2.3 trillion) dollars are unaccounted for and missing and the computers storing potential information on the money just happen to be in the precise wing that gets hit in the pentagon. I think that just wraps it up!

  • @Transc3ndence And why did Bldg 7 get "pulled" on 9/11? Because the center of control operations was probably Building 7 with the recently reinforced floors to protect them from fire and debris. After they carried out the plans, then they destroyed any evidence by controlled demolition of Bldg 7. Too many coincidences and not enough truth. We do need to have a truth commission with subpoena power in the United States investigate this and other recent events in U.S. history.

  • I nearly fell out of my chair. I am in stitches.

  • How awesome is that?

  • What do you mean "even Hitler" understands that physics trumps all propaganda. Hitler is the biggest victim of propaganda.

    You obviously have not applied your very astute understandings of science to debunking the "holyhoax". And the two events are hardly unrelated...

  • Hah hah hah... Hitler was a twoofer.

  • Hitler, if he were alive today, would be a 911 Truther.

    Hitler's declaration of war speech ranted about Jews, Zionists and Freemasons just like the racist Truthers do today.

  • @flanksteak2 Interesting comparison, you indeed sir are correct. It is exactly the same conflict being repeated, between the same two groups of people. Everything that has happened since the 1940s has proved Hitler exactly correct

    Funny how the Jewish Lobby is right in the middle of everything that has been bad for this country: massive illegal immigration, enforced integration of our schools, 40 years of racial discrimination against Whites, now the hate laws that discriminate against Whites

  • @pk1225 "Funny how"

    You are on the bottom of the Food Chain in White Civilization and think it's the fault of minorities and jews because that is the best your brain can do. It cannot better itself and lift you up the food chain and won't admit to itself that it's stupid so it must blame Jews and Blacks.

  • @flanksteak2 And your proof for any of that is?  rofl

    Weak mind, weak argument, extremely weak grasp on reality.

  • @flanksteak2 The 9/11 Truth movement really has you JIDF trolls running scared. I can see why - nobody is buying the official version of 9/11.

    And when people finally put it together and figure out that this is the second time that Israel has physically waged war on America, all hell will break loose (the USS Liberty was the first).

    Accepting that the collapse was a demo job goes a long way in helping the US public figure out what so many already know. 9/11 was carried out by Israel.

  • @pk1225 Why would Bin Laden claim to have done it, why would Islamists continue to try and attack us if Israel did 911?

    Why are you implying Islamists have no motivation to attack us? Are you European? A lot of European's are Anti-Semites.

  • @flanksteak2 I don't really even need to mention the $3 trillion theft that an overwhelmingly Jewish banking industry recently pulled off?

    Hitler was completely right, America is too heavily Judasized to survive. And thanks to all these Jewish tricks, she may very well soon be going down.

    But really the attack is on the European race as a whole. Every single European country is suffering from these Jewish tricks. Banking fraud, massive immigration, media deceit, wars in the Middle East...

  • @pk1225 I think if you are going to make those sorts of claims that it might be wise to come up with some evidence first.

  • YooHoo, DuhbunkersAreRetarded! I'm over here, posting on this video now. Stalk on over here and post one of your brain dribble comments so we can all laugh at how fucked in the head you are that you are looking up all my comments and then stalking me around YouTube. The actions of the saddest kind of pathetic troll in God's creation. Go on, give us a laugh you fucktard shit head.

  • The best hitler EVER!

  • Off the chart of brilliance.

  • Very good. Nice to have a laugh among the gravity (no pun intended) of the situation.

  • LOL! Reminds me of The Onion with the Al Qaeda man trying to claim they did it...

  • Best Hitler dub ever!

  • what program did you use for the subtitles?

    It helps get the Truth out there ... little by little

  • Brill.

  • Brilliant!

  • so obviously an inside job! It is not about people making 'unsubstantiated claims'

    Its about looking at the facts, the videos, debris fields. (11oo missing bodies),the testimony of people there and bc of reason coming to the horrible realization that only explosions could explain the facts/

    Or do you really think the North Tower can turn to dust from gravity alone, when it was hit just 10 stories from the roof line and the towers were highly redundant structures?

    No way!

  • lol, I speak German and this is EXACTLY what he was saying in the movie.

  • ... required course for all E. engineer students and the hands-on elements of the trade deal with electromagnetism which is a specialized field of physics.

    Because it is an important issue I'll go through the list again and make a detailed chart of which signers hold which degrees and their respective experience. So people can make their own judgments based on the facts of the matter.

    hopefully someone else does the same.

  • comic genius. The best comedy is based on truth.

  • Physics is not a popularity contest. Everyone "said" Galileo was wrong. Everyone "said" Einstein was wrong. So far no one can answer the physics. Here are are few issues not addressed: The heat needed to create the iron microspheres, the acceleration of the top block, the eutectic steel , the nano-thermite, the free fall of WTC 7, the straight down collapse of the "Spire", the squibs, the pyroclastic flow. Forget name calling; address the physics. PROVE the official story; with physics.

  • Wrong - those items have not been demonstrated ad nauseum. NIST, FEMA, NO one has addressed any of them.

    There is a good reason that there is no group called "Architicts and Engineers that support the official story". The more one investigates the scientific evidence, the more one realizes that the official story of an "office fire" gravity driven progressive collapse~is impossible.

    "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth"

  • @physicsandreason

    "There is a good reason that there is no group called "Architicts and Engineers that support the official story". "

    LOOOL! So true! Evert time I discuss this matter with a "hardcore" debunker, he often resorts to "organisations" and "institutions" that support the OCT. Then I always ask him about what ENDEPENDANT PERSONS who SIGNED that they would publicly support the NIST Report.

  • @physicsandreason

    Actully the few A's and E's at JREF could form that group called "Architects and Engineers that support the official story" - but it would house less than 10 persons. And as you say: There's a good reason that it won't go 10+!

    I simply can't stop laughing at the name of that group, "Architects and Engineers that support the official story. "It is SO funny! Thanks for giving me the laugh of the week! ; D

  • @cryptozoologist13

    i have just some college level structural analysis. im not a professional engineer, but even i can disprove the NIST explanation. have you even read it? or do you just defend it because you dont want to believe the towers were really brought down by explosives...? NIST says the building below the impact offered NO resistance to the falling top half.... thats impossible. if it was true, the buildings would have been impossible to build in the first place.

  • @sirpilf If there were explosives, it would show that Al Qaeda was that much better prepared. But at no point would it be sane to claim Bush administration did it. That is just completely insane.

  • @Fig1024 sure that would be insane, that would be as insane as saying roosevelt "did" pearl harbor.

    either way, if the planes made the buildings collapse, they shouldnt have collapsed to the ground. it completely goes against fundamental laws of conservation. try stacking 10 eggs... drop the top 2 on the bottom 8 eggs. the top 2 may destroy 2 below, but it cant destroy all 8, they dont have unlimited potential energy. unless there is something to weaken the bottom eggs... like explosives.

  • @cryptozoologist13 Are you trolling? When has anyone ever given a scientifically verifiable explanation for ANY of the things he listed?

  • No one said Galileo was wrong, Jackass.

    He was suspended for teaching unproven theory.

    The S&J Scientific Lab the TRUTHERS believe in, was a false flag company, it never existed except as a UPS drop box at the Provo, Utah airport.

    I got this information, by the incredibly hard technique of calling Provo, Utah 411, then the business license dept at city hall.

    Shows how little Truthers actually investigate.

    5 minutes to invalidate a Truther claim.

    That was hard.

    .

  • No one said Galileo was wrong, Jackass.

    He was suspended for teaching unproven theory.

    Then why the fuck did he get suspended for? They didn't suspend him because they thought he was right you fucking idiot, I've read your shit before but that's just the stupidest thing I've read from you, I'm sorry.

  • LOL!!! You can't seriously be THAT stupid! You're doing one of those "Colbert Opposite" jokes or something, right? You need to investigate where your A.S.S. is, because you obviously couldn't find it in the dark with a flashlight. Perhaps more practice is warranted, which would actually help with the lingering smell. And the "full of crappe" issue, as well.

  • Gee, Popper.

    What are you talking about?

    The stupidity of Truthers believing in a Lab Report that comes from Nowhere?

    MAYBE that's why Steven Jones had to BUY their way into a Near Eastern pay 2 publish Fraud Journal, WITHOUT telling the editor, and why the chief editor there QUIT over it.

    S&J Scientific is right on the front cover of the Truther Lab Report, the phone number is at the bottom, call it yourself.

    I hear the lab report is really just a collection of unrelated photos.

  • @physicsandreason The physics were answered. The massive fireball the plane created caused fire on many floors around the impact zone and an office is ripe with material that can fuel a fire for a long time. The plane ripped off fire protection to the floor trusses (of those that did not fail at time of impact). Most of the support for each floor is distributed to the perimeter columns. The steel being weakened by fire began to sag and eventually pulled on the perimeter columns enough to snap...

  • @physicsandreason them. The south tower fell first because the plane struck at an angle and most of the plane was lodged up against the corner where fire was seen as well as molten aluminum. As a result the South tower fell with a lean to the weaker side. Once any failure occurs there is no way the tower can recover. The tower was only designed for static load of the floors above. WTC 7 also is a clear natural failure as well. If we watch the full collapse initially the penthouse on one side...

  • Wrong. Temps needed to create the iron microspheres found by RJ Lee & USGS? Impossible with jet fuel /office fire. Free fall acceleration of WTC 7? Impossible with NIST theory. The straight down fall of the "spire"? Impossible with your theory. Not one pancake floor/roof at ground 0? What cut the steel? Impossible with jet/office fire. Eutectic Steel? And nano-thermite? NIST ignored all. "When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

  • @ScriabinFanatic LOL splendid explanations... and the Earth is flat... everyone can see it

  • @physicsandreason

    I have been trying to debunk you for MONTHS.

    You won't reply to me, as I am an engineer, and

    you know my critiques of your bogus experiments

    are real and credible. Good luck with fooling

    the rubes out in Booneyville. The engineers

    know better.

  • @Merlin5x5 Hey look its the same ignorant shill from all the other 911 videos!

    LOL tools like you do not bother me anymore I just laugh at the likes of you and point out the obvious for the people out there who are not to lazy to read a bit.

    So keep wasting your time fraud.

  • @marquedesade

    Let's LIST the 911 Movement theories so far.

    Hologram Airliners, Nano sized explosives NOT fabricated till 2002 (Steven Jones), Death Rays from Outer Space, and Orbital Battle stations (Judy Woods), Nibiru Aliens (David Ickes), Disappearing airliners in Cleveland (Loose Change 2), SHOT DOWN airliners (same flight 93) OVER Shanksville (Loose Change 1), Giant Conspiracies of the Military, The FBI, The CIA, The NYC and Washington Cops and FDNY, . Who is delusional?

  • @Merlin5x5 So...we meet again.

    We know all your tricks. The jig is up.

    watch?v=awy8cmcuBlk

    Be gone with you, spook!

    BTW best spoof of this video...EVARRRR!!!

  • @Mewlin2x4, I wonder why we would ever believe that the Shanksville crash was a shoot down? Maybe it might have something to do with RUMSFELD FUCKING ADMITTING IT ON TELEVISION YOU RETARDED FUCKWIT!

  • Comment removed

  • @lunac1, The crash site at Shanksville certainly doesn't look like any plane crash I have ever seen before, especially as the so-called 'wing scars' ere there before the crash even occurred, if Google earth is to be believed. Rummy said it was a shoot down on TV, I've seen the video on Youtube, you tube. Voice recordings must be one of the easiest things in the world to fake.

    P.S. Dear Mr. Shill, GO FUCK YOURSELF!

  • Comment removed

  • @lunatic1 made another of his wonderful comments that consisted of a rant against me but when I came to reply, it had been removed. What proof is there that the plane entered the ground at 90degrees, (other than a total lack of visible evidence of a plane crash?), the transcript of the cockpit recording from the control tower? Well, that could be faked same as most sound recordings. Rummy saying it was a shoot down sounds highly plausible to me. What was shot down will remain a mystery.

  • @marquedesade, not only is he a troll for the zionists, he is also a bit of a pervert as well. He was found trolling around some videos that were showing underage sex slaves, (it was meant to show their plight but I think Mewlie was enjoying the show) He also likes to fuck midgets, especially his favourite midget prostitute called Tiny Starr, who apparently looks like a boy. PM me if you want to know the sources of this info.

  • @Mewling2x4, Hey Mewlie, got your fantastic duhbunkernut video finished yet? Thought not, too busy with underage sex slave videos and midget prostitutes to do what you keep promising. You really are a sad sack pile of shit.

  • @Mewlin2x4, Trying to debunk physics&reason for months but a total failure as per usual, eh Tony? How's your fantastic duhbunking video coming along? If you actually take the time to remove your dick from Tiny Starr, you might get something accomplished. You still won't debunk anything but you might kill yourself in an explosion and make the world a better place. : )

  • @cryptozoologist13 There aren't 2000 engineers who are out there slicing their arguments to pieces, though. There is no group of engineers dedicated to silencing "the disrespectful ae911truth group". People lose their careers , professors lose their tenure, for openly criticizing the official story.

  • Because they have better thing to do with their lives than debunk the same old arguments that have been decisively torn to shreds time and time again. The truthers simply re-state the same frigging arguments over again... it's not worth the time and effort - especially when most people are bright enough to see through the truther BS.

  • @cryptozoologist13 Plus, most people still have not heard of Building 7. Skim through those personal bios on ae911truth, and find how many times it's mentioned that Building 7 is what convinced them.

    As for your claim about software/computer engineers in the mix... I went through and picked out the ones who have no degree in a relevant field, including all the computer and software engineers.

    The list was 14 names shorter.

  • LMAO, most people haven't heard of WTC 7?

    On what planet? The Truthers 100 questions, posted on many of their websites in 2006, were answered by NIST in early 2007, more than THREE years ago.

    SO far, Truthers haven't come up with newer questions.

    Just because it's new to you, Zapproowsdower, doens't make it new to us, NIST, debunkers, or the MSM.

    WTC's initial FIRE dept team into the building called it on their first inspection, doomed to fail, and abandoned it, taped it off.

    .

  • @Merlin5x5 I think you misunderstand my point, and further misunderstand the evidence you cite to attack the point you think I made.

    NIST employs a panel of something like 23 scientists. Their latest version came out in 2008 - not 2007 - and it has been torn apart by various groups, like ae911truth. They admitted free-fall acceleration, remember?

    My point was that most engineers have not heard of building 7. MSM almost never mentions it. Obviously NIST and "debunkers" have, that is irrelevant.

  • No, actually, the web page for the FAQs is dated Sept. 2007.

    Like debunkers, they haven't updated their FAQs because truthers haven't updated the questions they pose.

    This is old stuff, really.

    WTC 7, BTW, was featured in BOTH the popular mechanics and Nat Geo features on 911 conspiracy. Aren't they MSM?

    BTW, they admitted free fall of JUST the external skin, and only for 4.8 seconds.

    LOGICALLY, Zapproows, that would leave the parapet at around 40 floors in the air, Huh?

  • 14 names shorter?

    Seriously?

    I just started at the top of the list and started striking off people who had specious qualifications - it's not limited to software engineers. I didn't even bother counting ones that were arguable in my favour.

    I stopped counting at 50. I was less than 10% of the way down the first column.

    This is why most people can't be bothered arguing truthers - it's like arguing with a radish.

  • @cryptozoologist13 A radish? I went all the way down the list. Look, if you can't remain emotionally stable while arguing a point, then your arguments really don't hold much merit. Try counting again with your head not quite so far up your ass.

  • Wow. That wins it. You are right. Logically consistent and stable argument to the core.

    I'm done.

  • I was trying to have an actual argument, but then you throw a pitiful insult into the mix. Yet you can't even handle a mild retort? Maybe I wasn't too far off.

    I kept a list of the names I omitted. There were only 3 or 4 that were computer or software engineers, obviously to be omitted. It'd tedious because the bios can be deceptive and you one must check the actual degrees held, I'm sure you were doing that. I was too.

    Now, there is a gray area. Like, electrical engineers. Physics is a ...

  • @cryptozoologist13 Then try explaining the facts in a satisfactory way.

    "Gravity caused the towers to pulverize themselves in 15 seconds. and wtc7 to implode neatly in 7 secs" (according to nist because one column failed..LOL!!

    hey clueless Idiot, FUCK THE FUCK OFF!

    you obviously know nothing about 9/11 or you might just address a single fact with some plausible hypothesis ..

    (Keep the offensive personal comments for your no doubt similarly retarded loved ones and offspring dickhead.

  • @winston2015 I wish I could figure out what the issue people have with following the actual physics back to reality. I know the math is hard (that is NOT a sarcastic comment intended for slighting your intelligence - parts of it really are hard) and some details can be really hard to ferret out the specifics of, but the truth IS out there if you do the work and figure it out from square one science rather than what someone whose mind has already been made up tells you on a conspiracy forum.

  • Well, Hitler is actually a good spokesman for the 9/11 truthers since they generally employ the same kinds of methodology and revisionism as holocaust deniers.

  • bump for sending the conspirators to jail fo9r a life of butt raping.

  • STOP BUTCHERING THIS BRILLIANT MOVIE. Especially with this bullshit. Now be ashamed and die in a corner, fucking truthers.

  • Ahh shut the fuck up if you belive the offical story about the WTC then your an Idiot!

  • No, YOU shut up! Meh, meeeh! Now here is how it goes: If YOU believe to know "the official story" because you have watched bullshit videos which distort things when they're not just making shit up in the first place, then YOU are the idiot. You most likely don't even know what "the official story" is. Yet here we are, and you are showing you have no idea. Else you would shut the fuck up already. Plus, my point stands. Fucking truthers.

  • Check out Jesse Ventura - Conspiracy Theory: 9/11

    watch?v=Z6WdKnrjlBw

    watch?v=Z6WdKnrjlBw#t=3m53s // rodriguez. last man out of WTC

    watch?v=Z6WdKnrjlBw#t=7m4s // jones. explosive residue found

    watch?v=0NxbU0xWCHc#t=0m39s // romero. super-thermite test

  • 1. Rodriguez changes his story more than most people change their underwear.

    2. Jones runs away from peer review the same way most people run away from herpes.

    3. Romero never confirmed that NT does what the twoof wish it does.

  • yeah it may aswel ave been hitler!

  • And that about sums up the lunacy of the truth movement; that parody is indistinguishable from the genuine product.

  • The statements made by 'Hitler' @2:00 is a logical fallacy.

  • the statements made by truthers in general are logical fallacies.

  • @BillBJJ78: and lies. Don't forget the lies :)

  • It's not that the people have been brainwashed... the problem is *they dont want to belive it*. They probably all do realise the truth, but they're too frightened to admit it to themselves...

  • ...which leads them to ridicule anyone that steps outside of the norm - its what people do. You stray from the official narrative and you will get burned.

  • The official explanation for the events of 911 omits the confiscated footage from the Pentagon cctv which in itself is smellier than a dead rat. Sadly Joe Public is too busy balancing enslavement and media spooned leisure to work it out for himself using his alcohol addled brain. The pancake theory needs more than maple syrup to hold water. Laws of physics cannot be denied. How come those alleged planes didn't crumple on contact with the towers as we watched them disappear into the WTC's? THINK!

  • To answer the last question you made - because the speed of the planes was sufficient to punch through the columns with relative ease.

    I'm hoping for a reply on this, I need a good laugh.

  • And what speed approximately in your expert opinion were the alleged planes flying? careful now....

  • @ibrowze: I'm not an expert in the field, but the speeds cited by experts were between 490 and 570 knots for flight 175, or approximately 900-1050 km/h.

  • Comment removed

  • great but y'all are thermite sniffers.

  • Hilarious! Good job!

  • Obviously the person who translated this doesn't speak German. : )

  • BRAVO!!! :D

  • 1/10, a joke, a travesty.

  • Who is misrepresenting the science? Who is ignoring DNA evidence, engineering studies and the like?

    Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

    'Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.'

    Sun Tzu

  • Shocking! Hitler did not know when to use "whoever" or "whomever". I am stunned!

  • You got the point didn't you?

  • see... even Hitler gets it.

  • spread the word,loved it

  • Bravo!!

  • great work

  • A super job, an awesome clip! Kudos to the produceer.

    I'm forwarding the link, and recommend all that see this do as well... United we stand!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more