hungry for a laser tv, just purchased showwx laser projector, cannot wait for next year. if you wacht this video again next year, you will still hear they say next year,
Also the colour clarity, it's saturated. You can bump up the saturation in the service menu on a plasma and getting even more saturated then the LaserTV. Also, LaserTV might have deeper colour but the deeper the colour the darker and the darker the less detail.
Actually this guy is wrong about colour replication, a plasma TV produces more colours in the colour scheme then the human brain can perceive. And laserTV is more like DLP, the technology is the same in principle. Honestly plasma is best because it produces the best colour without mechanical parts. LaserTV is like dlp so it's mechanical. NO MOVING PARTS other than fans are best! Anyway's Plasma made it for 20 something years and when LCD came out it still wins.
if this was made in 2007 then why the hell havnt i seen this in shops yet ? its 2011 for fucks sake lol the only new thing ive seen in shops now are the LED tv's
The only difference I see is that the laser TV portrays unnatural-looking blue water and blue skies. Until that technology is refined, Plasma will still be the choice when it comes to best picture quality over and above LCD and LED.
@JISINSANE3 The new ones have the 6 color processor utilizeed with the purest light source lazer yours just have the regular bulb. This will be outdated in 5 years when Ultra HD comes out and then later Super HD in 10 years.
Dont Bother buying this technology, 200Watts are you kidding.
AMOLED will surpass this by miles and miles AMOLED is likely to be 20-30Watts!!! plus refresh rates into the 400-600Hz region. Not to mention that its ultra thin <10mm in most formats, add to this scalable and flex technologies and kiss good bye to all the other display types in the world
they cant get the LLAP licensing - emissions in the microwave spectrum exceeds maximum safety limits by 45% at 2 meters. go to google and type LLAP licensing laser tv
I bet all the good shit is in the Cities cause each time I go down to my local Retravision Store they still have shitty LCDs and Crappy Plamas but their wa this one good Plasma. I swear you could see a gran of sand and the colours were eye popping but some asshole bought it.... Damn you Christmas lol
I've lost count of the number of times a new technology has been announced in the media with a projected date for its release, only to not eventuate. Always very disappointing when that happens but I'm never surprised.
It's probably a good technology, though I'm really holding out for SED.
Agree ... OLED kicks ass. . I dont care about laser TV's ... when i can get an 3 -4 mm thick TV that uses alot less power then a plasma or regular LCD .. why get a laser tV? ....
It works the same way Plasma TVs work. The only difference is that while Plasmas shoot beams of Red, Blue and Green electrons through a vacuum tube to produce light, the Laser TVs skip the first step and just produce Red, Blue and Green light straight from a beam of light. It's basically the idea of taking 3 projectors, one producing Red light, the others producing Blue and Green, and each projecting on to the same screen. The convergence of each colour creates an accurate colored image.
They don't. That's why Laser TV isn't mainstream yet. Watching it for too long can cause serious damage to your eyes. It's a major flaw, and manufacturers still have no conventional solution to fix it. Despite that, Laser TV is the cheapest, and will give you the most clear, sharp and colorful image.
Plasma and CRT are the same technology. Plasma uses more technologically advanced methods than CRT, but the fundamental method of producing an image is the same. an HD CRT would actually be better than a plasma because it gives the same color accuracy and response time with less chance of burnin. The only flaw the CRT ever really had was its weight., and is still used today by game developers and CG animators.
The only similarity is that they both use a light emitting phosphor. The details of how they work are completely different. To say that they are "the same technology" is sort of like saying that a reciprocating engine and a gas turbine are the same technology because they both use internal combustion.
Rear-side projection TV's used a high powered lamp that emitted light through a RGB colored spinning wheel. No other technology other than cathode TV's used phosphorus. moron
Older, cathode tube TV's used a ion cannon that shoot particles at a vacuum chamber which was layered by phosphorus, the particles shot by the cannon upon hitting the the phosphorus layer it would emit light. Voltage would change the color of the particle upon contact. Read your facts smartass.
@alincrys Plasma display panels use a phosphor coating inside the plasma cells of each pixel. Look up how they work. You also have the details on how a CRT works almost completely wrong. They use an electron beam with three "guns" and a shadow mask in front of the RGB phosphor dots on the glass that restricts each beam to a one of the three colors of phosphor. It makes you look twice as bad when you call someone else a moron when you are in fact completely wrong.
It's a nice video, but I bought a plasma 54 inches Full HD T.V. from Philips last mounth, and think that's for the moment a wise option!. I never saw a T.V. Set with a picture so pure and bright to use with Blue Ray players!.
Taihen kyomiga adimasu !!! I anxiously await... especially if there is a 'projector' style device.... that could be connected to most anything and small & light & low power consumption(batteries?) & ALOT of lumens...& all that good stuff. For those of us living in 3rd-world areas...
Hope theres compitition between OLED and laser in the future.Helps drives down the prices and even improve the product.(Im hoping sony improve the apparent 4 year shelf life)
Wow,Now that invented the laser TV the can move on to phase 2...Sharks with laser attched to them. Yeahhhhhh I love every one that commented (NO HOMO)
hang on a minute this vid claims laser tv invented in australia while the other vid going round on here showing nemo claims u.s invention. mmmm very strange, time to get your patents in now!!!
Ok, I am currently intersted in buying a 46 inch lcd 1080p Samsung.Originally upon seeing this I thought hey this could be something.That said let me tell you that the first tvs to arrive this fall will be around 4000 bucks and the models will not be seen in major retailers until late 2009.So with this knowledge I am going to move forward with my purchase.I do not want to have to wait another 3 years before I can afford this technology.
True. And LCD also has a decade+ head start so it`s not fair to compare them yet. Still; i`m somewhat more interested in OLED because of it`s energy efficiency and because it`s incredibly thin. It also has a contrast ratio of
1,000,000:1. But the future is most likely e-ink. This paper screen is very interesting. Flexible and Extremely energy efficient. Yet it`s a great job from the Australians for developing this technology into a regular TV screen. I will certainly follow it`s progress.
the only thing about OLED tv that bothers me is that it only has a shelf life of four years since its organic. So the question is who is going to buy a tv every four years? Its utterly stupid now adays that people by a 1500 dollar tv ever five years now when back in the day you bought a tv and it lasted for 30 years. I'm not impressed and just because a tv is thinner i'm more interested in longevity and good picture. I have better things to do with my money then buying tv's every 4 years.
Well Sonys claims a lifespan of 30,000 hours for it`s first screens. A research company claims their test of the Sony oled Tv shows it might only last 17.000 hours. But considering i watch TV about 2 hours each day i could still use it for about 8500 days or 23 years my self. But i agree it`s a great marketing trick. Just sell them one TV and a few years later they might need another. That`s certainly a good business model. But not a very moral one if you ask me.
Yeah great marketing trick to those who don't think before they buy. Non laswer LED's do not produce a single frequency and are a mostley incoherent light source. They typically have a bandwidth of at least a few nanometers. But in the new laser tv's coming out a diode laser is different in that it puts the gain material the LED inside a laswer cavity to produce a coherent output through the effect of stimulated emission.
Cool. And e-ink might be even more interesting in a few years time considering it uses the least energy of all options. Because of it`s flexibility it also opens up a whole new world. And it`s also extremely long lasting. Just take a look; om/watch?v=Wgh6CM6D-hY
it uses barley any energy compared to a hairdryer, air conditioning so dont worry about energy efficient, just change your lightbulbs thats 120 bucks if you do :)
An also a unpulsed diode or otherwise laswer usually has much less bandwidth and is therefore more spectrally pure. It would also be much much brighter then an incoherent LED too. Sorry i misspelled laser like twice in my last post. Must be the excitement of that new laser tv coming out in 2009.(lol)
Are you serious? Where do you live? They have one at Best Buy down here in Tampa,Florida. Its only one but i'm going to tell you its hard on the eyes. This one you have to be sitting a good distance back but it is better then a plasma hands down.
its a shame we cant see quality differences for our selves because of the crappy video quality on youtube...or even the relatively crappy quality of our computer screens compared to these televisions
you dont need to see it in its actual quality , we just need to see it compared to what we know is good like regular HDTV, we can compare them and see how much better it looks
I have three basic consumer questions: 1- Will laser TV and Oled be 3D ready like the Phillips (as we are heading down that road). 2- How long is their life span? (as I see oled not too trust worthy judging from the you tubes videos). 3-Will they be used as a home computer (touch screen and remote control) and TV alike? Best 2 all.
now sony has to make a oled and laser tv if they get/loan the richts, to put their bravia pro engine into it and view fullhd etc,, programs on it to get the best possible image quality,were,re they waiting for.
The OLED is boasting the possibility to go beyond Full HD, they're releasing a 27 inch model which has Full HD resolution; never before seen on a screen that isn't a monitor.
wait,,,here it comes,,,you heard it first,,I S O LINEAR LECS..YUP...ion/silicon/linear/light emitting/chip/set.....will make LCD,PLASMA,LASER &LED TVs a thing of the past just like 405 line B&W..soon ,very soon
While your gaming the world as you know it passed you by,you spend half or more of your life infront of the tv thats why this is cool to most people. Its just something to blow your money on theirs allways something to blow your cash on who cares?
OLED, the contrast ratio is higher than anything in development at the minute by about x5 and the image quality is intense, the only thing is, it'll probably cost more, and they're still working on making it last. but certainly, plasma vs. LCD is old news
what type of plasma is next to this tv in the demo is it ta vizio or something good like a pioneer how deep is it 12 inch deep lcd are a waste so if it that thic forget about it if only sony made a larger oled tv i think that will be better
Why nobody talk about the depth of this laser tv? Is it similar the depth of common rear projection type tv, about 24 inched depth. May be similar case as SED. The road for it is still long. May be needs more than 5 years less than ten years to see 2 inches depth laser tv in the market. So it just a strategy of Mitsubishi to stop people to buy LCD and Plasma panel for the moment. isn't it?
OK, seriously, what the hell does it matter if the thickness is 12" or so, if I can get a large,lets say 60-70" display that hsa many times better picture like color, black-level,brightness and response time (ie better then anything out there),do you really think I would care if the cabinet is 12-16" deep, you can't be serious, especially at the same price or even cheaper...
hungry for a laser tv, just purchased showwx laser projector, cannot wait for next year. if you wacht this video again next year, you will still hear they say next year,
tommycp29 3 weeks ago
today is 2012, Plasma TV still alive.
declaration963 3 weeks ago
Where is your laser TV, no where to be found
coolferds06 2 months ago
:0
Aaaaaaaaaaaaawwww
I'm moving to Austrailia
MrMeat42 2 months ago
mitsubishit "dip 6" only for "dip shitz"!
jones2612 6 months ago
the only laser you're gonna see is from my light sabre when I shove it up that guy's arse!!!
jones2612 6 months ago
Ha...this just proves the overriding world theme...the SUPERT CRT's will be the new standard by 2015...mark my words and do not question my authority
jones2612 6 months ago
Also the colour clarity, it's saturated. You can bump up the saturation in the service menu on a plasma and getting even more saturated then the LaserTV. Also, LaserTV might have deeper colour but the deeper the colour the darker and the darker the less detail.
NerdForMIT 7 months ago
Actually this guy is wrong about colour replication, a plasma TV produces more colours in the colour scheme then the human brain can perceive. And laserTV is more like DLP, the technology is the same in principle. Honestly plasma is best because it produces the best colour without mechanical parts. LaserTV is like dlp so it's mechanical. NO MOVING PARTS other than fans are best! Anyway's Plasma made it for 20 something years and when LCD came out it still wins.
NerdForMIT 7 months ago
It's 2011 where the fuck is my LaserTV?
McNuggets010 10 months ago 7
@McNuggets010, it's called LaserVue and it's from Mitsubishi.
rfsent5 9 months ago 4
Mitsubishi has been selling a Laser RPTV for a few years now.
MITSUBISHI L75-A91
75" LASERVUE TV
Parson2 11 months ago 2
that color range is beyond what NTSC can even handle.. there is no point, to even having such color range, far beyond what they even broadcast..
kiyotewolf 1 year ago
@kiyotewolf Have you ever heard of bluray and video games fuck nut? No one buys a hd tv just to watch cable tv.
TheDukeljk 9 months ago
@TheDukeljk
You need Nanny McFee!
* shoves a bar of soap in your mouth *
kiyotewolf 9 months ago
if this was made in 2007 then why the hell havnt i seen this in shops yet ? its 2011 for fucks sake lol the only new thing ive seen in shops now are the LED tv's
MrCohibaboy 1 year ago 2
This video was from 2007 and I still don't see any laser TV's in Walmart
1JayCutlerFan1 1 year ago
Clearly this is the 10 year plan.
Nokorola 1 year ago
lol, I thought the TV on the right was the laser one....fail
DMB206 1 year ago
@DMB206 haha, same man that one looked a load brighter
xcineguy101 1 year ago
is it possible to fit a tv into a lazer pointer sized projector
TheBeyBladeNation 1 year ago
Those guys were put in mud by big boys(LG, Samsung) It`s like their were gonna give their multibillion factories a death sentence? right.....
Same with goes with fossil fuels and all....
Oh well maybe sometime......
dainiuxxx 1 year ago
I feel obsolete...
yo6ial 1 year ago
this technology takes a long time to master....
splitting a laser man while making it crisp clear ??
=O .. miracle
nuggert 1 year ago
The only difference I see is that the laser TV portrays unnatural-looking blue water and blue skies. Until that technology is refined, Plasma will still be the choice when it comes to best picture quality over and above LCD and LED.
Cypherus21 1 year ago
That shit didn't last to long hvent seen that junk for ever plasma still the KING
Canadianboii1918 1 year ago
I bet you the big HDTV companies shut down this technology...but if I remember correctly samsung was interested in this technology.
turgore 1 year ago
HOLY SHIT OUR TVS HAVE LAZERS NOW
AquaHedgehog 1 year ago
the one on the left looks shittier in quality...
mkdaisgory 1 year ago
The future here isn't really lazer TV but lazer projector built into an iPhone
kaneta1i 1 year ago
now we've got september 2010 and nothing else than LCD, LED or Plasma?
Vassilika1 1 year ago 2
But does it play pong?
K00LStoryBro 1 year ago 2
Funny cause my mitsubishi 82" with dlp 6 color light engine already produces as much color as a laser tv and blows the lcd and plasma away in color.
JISINSANE3 1 year ago
@JISINSANE3 The new ones have the 6 color processor utilizeed with the purest light source lazer yours just have the regular bulb. This will be outdated in 5 years when Ultra HD comes out and then later Super HD in 10 years.
Onetazien 1 year ago
@JISINSANE3 The new laser 75Inch also has a 6 color processor, without the need for a bulb.
rvspawn 1 year ago
OLED TV is better mill to 1
dcool96 1 year ago
does it have a hdmi port and 1080i
sdfan00 1 year ago
Did i mention that laser TV is 10 years too late!
element2310 1 year ago
Dont Bother buying this technology, 200Watts are you kidding.
AMOLED will surpass this by miles and miles AMOLED is likely to be 20-30Watts!!! plus refresh rates into the 400-600Hz region. Not to mention that its ultra thin <10mm in most formats, add to this scalable and flex technologies and kiss good bye to all the other display types in the world
element2310 1 year ago
#LOL
moneyquickeasy 1 year ago
#poop
moneyquickeasy 1 year ago
WOHOO!!! :D now i can get a new comp screen with go world!
MasterOfFlash92 1 year ago
actually the laser tv never even lived #LOL
koovah 1 year ago
Too much blue! i don't like it.
tonycdrive 1 year ago
It's mid 2010 can't find one for sale in the UK.
voon100 1 year ago
I'm developing a revolutionary new TV technology powered by breakfast cereals. It will make everything obsolete. Hahahaha.
XanaduZune 1 year ago
someday humans will go blind xD
wwkit 1 year ago
Classss!!!!
weeowey 1 year ago
they cant get the LLAP licensing - emissions in the microwave spectrum exceeds maximum safety limits by 45% at 2 meters. go to google and type LLAP licensing laser tv
ScrewAttackChina 2 years ago
I bet all the good shit is in the Cities cause each time I go down to my local Retravision Store they still have shitty LCDs and Crappy Plamas but their wa this one good Plasma. I swear you could see a gran of sand and the colours were eye popping but some asshole bought it.... Damn you Christmas lol
TravvyG 2 years ago
Comment removed
drshields1988 2 years ago
They wont beat OLED for price.
sonofhendrix 2 years ago 2
haha what is this the new CRT? lol. OLED is definitely better than this.
joeb0 2 years ago 2
i'll stick with my 55" LED tv...
PaGoNdA 2 years ago 2
I've lost count of the number of times a new technology has been announced in the media with a projected date for its release, only to not eventuate. Always very disappointing when that happens but I'm never surprised.
It's probably a good technology, though I'm really holding out for SED.
lumabi25 2 years ago
I wonder if the laster TV came across a bad lifespan.
Movie16Master 2 years ago
This is like bullshit... unless digital TV streams suddenly broke out of the 8bit per byte computing without our knowning.
toasterder 2 years ago
well where the fuck is it then? i haven't seen any "LASER" branded tv's in Australia yet.
jawbraeka 2 years ago 2
@jawbraeka, It's known as Laservue and is from Mitsubishi. It's been out for more than a year.
rfsent5 9 months ago
xD what if laser burns out haha
morfingcone 2 years ago
plasma born dead lcd
ima90 2 years ago
well, the eye has a limit, we cant see more than 30fps, cant see more and more colors, so this technology cant grow any further.
xbahacn 2 years ago
@xbahacn
we can see more then 30fps you are just not avare of that
No3225 1 year ago
apparently this didn't catch on...
donovanx3 2 years ago
damn that sucks... technology moves faster than my work wage! don't they realise that?
djlance2006 2 years ago
@djlance2006
well the the technology exists since 1990...
the german company "Schneider-Rundfunkwerke AG" already had working prototypes 1993.
Skipan2 2 years ago
how does that change my statement??
djlance2006 2 years ago
LOL...good point!
Jarocho2003 2 years ago
so when are they coming out dammit?
ripsnorting13 2 years ago
hey wait........i want one of those,can i please?? lol
jadedmoon13 2 years ago
LED or Plasma??
kickassgta4 2 years ago
the plasma cult is gonna assassinate the creator of this.
MOTIVEONER 2 years ago
dont forget the 1:1000000 contrast ratio
daydream605 2 years ago
What about the Sony OLED tv's?
daydream605 2 years ago
Agree ... OLED kicks ass. . I dont care about laser TV's ... when i can get an 3 -4 mm thick TV that uses alot less power then a plasma or regular LCD .. why get a laser tV? ....
JudaZuk 2 years ago
Oh not again... That means I have to throw away my Sony Bravia XBR KDL-70XBR7 and buy a new one... tsk tsk
GGGunitNextLevel 2 years ago
How does this work?
ikemkrueger 2 years ago
It works the same way Plasma TVs work. The only difference is that while Plasmas shoot beams of Red, Blue and Green electrons through a vacuum tube to produce light, the Laser TVs skip the first step and just produce Red, Blue and Green light straight from a beam of light. It's basically the idea of taking 3 projectors, one producing Red light, the others producing Blue and Green, and each projecting on to the same screen. The convergence of each colour creates an accurate colored image.
Virginityrocks 2 years ago
no they dont
Curseoftheearth 2 years ago
That maybe sound stupid, but, how control they that the laser stay in the screen and don't hit your eye?
ikemkrueger 2 years ago
They don't. That's why Laser TV isn't mainstream yet. Watching it for too long can cause serious damage to your eyes. It's a major flaw, and manufacturers still have no conventional solution to fix it. Despite that, Laser TV is the cheapest, and will give you the most clear, sharp and colorful image.
Virginityrocks 2 years ago
I think you have plasma confused with CRT
Atomicskull 2 years ago
Plasma and CRT are the same technology. Plasma uses more technologically advanced methods than CRT, but the fundamental method of producing an image is the same. an HD CRT would actually be better than a plasma because it gives the same color accuracy and response time with less chance of burnin. The only flaw the CRT ever really had was its weight., and is still used today by game developers and CG animators.
Virginityrocks 2 years ago
The only similarity is that they both use a light emitting phosphor. The details of how they work are completely different. To say that they are "the same technology" is sort of like saying that a reciprocating engine and a gas turbine are the same technology because they both use internal combustion.
Atomicskull 2 years ago 4
@Atomicskull
Rear-side projection TV's used a high powered lamp that emitted light through a RGB colored spinning wheel. No other technology other than cathode TV's used phosphorus. moron
Older, cathode tube TV's used a ion cannon that shoot particles at a vacuum chamber which was layered by phosphorus, the particles shot by the cannon upon hitting the the phosphorus layer it would emit light. Voltage would change the color of the particle upon contact. Read your facts smartass.
alincrys 8 months ago
@alincrys Plasma display panels use a phosphor coating inside the plasma cells of each pixel. Look up how they work. You also have the details on how a CRT works almost completely wrong. They use an electron beam with three "guns" and a shadow mask in front of the RGB phosphor dots on the glass that restricts each beam to a one of the three colors of phosphor. It makes you look twice as bad when you call someone else a moron when you are in fact completely wrong.
Atomicskull 8 months ago
It's a nice video, but I bought a plasma 54 inches Full HD T.V. from Philips last mounth, and think that's for the moment a wise option!. I never saw a T.V. Set with a picture so pure and bright to use with Blue Ray players!.
mig189189189 2 years ago
Taihen kyomiga adimasu !!! I anxiously await... especially if there is a 'projector' style device.... that could be connected to most anything and small & light & low power consumption(batteries?) & ALOT of lumens...& all that good stuff. For those of us living in 3rd-world areas...
9tee 2 years ago
They said these Laser TV's would be out almost a year ago?
holdengemi 2 years ago 2
Laser tv's are the dead for plasma and OLED is the dead for LCD
checho006 2 years ago
thats right the biggest competation in television.. i prepare to go in OLED bec. LASERTV too dangerous to your health, too much radiations..
tazzzzzzzz9999 2 years ago
wow....
Matti861 2 years ago
LOL. its not like the laser gets in your eyes noob!
plasma should scare you too, you find it in the sun. how old are you?
toocoolforu 2 years ago 2
oh yes all that optical light radiation going everywhere, its going to melt everyone.
the sun puts out more harmful radiation than electronic appliances anyway
cameron20020 2 years ago
Hope theres compitition between OLED and laser in the future.Helps drives down the prices and even improve the product.(Im hoping sony improve the apparent 4 year shelf life)
imnotfrommilkyway 3 years ago 2
Absolutely NO reason to show it. Not like you can see it's quality.
d0md0mt0mt0m 3 years ago
channel 10 :D
fknrandomm1 3 years ago
Wow,Now that invented the laser TV the can move on to phase 2...Sharks with laser attched to them. Yeahhhhhh I love every one that commented (NO HOMO)
caymangame 3 years ago
OLED tv and laser tv looks good indeed
Cedde82 3 years ago
nice and 40 percent cheaper than plasma
roblox84 3 years ago
fuck i just bought a plasma a few minutes ago -.-
infertagul 3 years ago 28
@infertagul thats why i got an LED sharp... lol
240SSONLY 1 year ago
cool
wraithofwonder 3 years ago
hang on a minute this vid claims laser tv invented in australia while the other vid going round on here showing nemo claims u.s invention. mmmm very strange, time to get your patents in now!!!
believeitagain 3 years ago
i think the chip was made in aust
charlie4114 3 years ago
Ok, I am currently intersted in buying a 46 inch lcd 1080p Samsung.Originally upon seeing this I thought hey this could be something.That said let me tell you that the first tvs to arrive this fall will be around 4000 bucks and the models will not be seen in major retailers until late 2009.So with this knowledge I am going to move forward with my purchase.I do not want to have to wait another 3 years before I can afford this technology.
TimDJ84 3 years ago
im in the same boat i think ill drop 2000 now and 2000 again for a laser in a few years time. instead of 4000 all at once that way i have two tvs.
charlie4114 3 years ago
The screen on the right looks better.
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago 5
Hm, you seem to be forgetting that the only difference you can see is the contrast.
d0md0mt0mt0m 3 years ago
True. And LCD also has a decade+ head start so it`s not fair to compare them yet. Still; i`m somewhat more interested in OLED because of it`s energy efficiency and because it`s incredibly thin. It also has a contrast ratio of
1,000,000:1. But the future is most likely e-ink. This paper screen is very interesting. Flexible and Extremely energy efficient. Yet it`s a great job from the Australians for developing this technology into a regular TV screen. I will certainly follow it`s progress.
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago 2
Yeah OLED seems to be the way with us destroying the planet and what not.
d0md0mt0mt0m 3 years ago
the only thing about OLED tv that bothers me is that it only has a shelf life of four years since its organic. So the question is who is going to buy a tv every four years? Its utterly stupid now adays that people by a 1500 dollar tv ever five years now when back in the day you bought a tv and it lasted for 30 years. I'm not impressed and just because a tv is thinner i'm more interested in longevity and good picture. I have better things to do with my money then buying tv's every 4 years.
laronfox 3 years ago
Well Sonys claims a lifespan of 30,000 hours for it`s first screens. A research company claims their test of the Sony oled Tv shows it might only last 17.000 hours. But considering i watch TV about 2 hours each day i could still use it for about 8500 days or 23 years my self. But i agree it`s a great marketing trick. Just sell them one TV and a few years later they might need another. That`s certainly a good business model. But not a very moral one if you ask me.
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago
Yeah great marketing trick to those who don't think before they buy. Non laswer LED's do not produce a single frequency and are a mostley incoherent light source. They typically have a bandwidth of at least a few nanometers. But in the new laser tv's coming out a diode laser is different in that it puts the gain material the LED inside a laswer cavity to produce a coherent output through the effect of stimulated emission.
laronfox 3 years ago
Cool. And e-ink might be even more interesting in a few years time considering it uses the least energy of all options. Because of it`s flexibility it also opens up a whole new world. And it`s also extremely long lasting. Just take a look; om/watch?v=Wgh6CM6D-hY
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago
it uses barley any energy compared to a hairdryer, air conditioning so dont worry about energy efficient, just change your lightbulbs thats 120 bucks if you do :)
mit871chell 3 years ago
An also a unpulsed diode or otherwise laswer usually has much less bandwidth and is therefore more spectrally pure. It would also be much much brighter then an incoherent LED too. Sorry i misspelled laser like twice in my last post. Must be the excitement of that new laser tv coming out in 2009.(lol)
laronfox 3 years ago
mmmmmmmmm well its now june and havent heard shit about it im looking to buy an lcd but i would wait if they come out this yr
fkngtwat 2 years ago
Are you serious? Where do you live? They have one at Best Buy down here in Tampa,Florida. Its only one but i'm going to tell you its hard on the eyes. This one you have to be sitting a good distance back but it is better then a plasma hands down.
laronfox 2 years ago
Good stuff. Bring on the Laser revolution! OLED, FED and SED are good but not a patch on Laser.
IridiumPlatinum 3 years ago
its a shame we cant see quality differences for our selves because of the crappy video quality on youtube...or even the relatively crappy quality of our computer screens compared to these televisions
gobanzomon 3 years ago 16
you dont need to see it in its actual quality , we just need to see it compared to what we know is good like regular HDTV, we can compare them and see how much better it looks
pianokid100 3 years ago
tech is stupid, by the time it is affordable, you go and by it, only to learn a new and better product has replaced it
hondahp18 3 years ago
can i plug my vhs tapes in to the tv : )
Badassmoafo 3 years ago 4
I have three basic consumer questions: 1- Will laser TV and Oled be 3D ready like the Phillips (as we are heading down that road). 2- How long is their life span? (as I see oled not too trust worthy judging from the you tubes videos). 3-Will they be used as a home computer (touch screen and remote control) and TV alike? Best 2 all.
nyesteiran 3 years ago
yeh! cant wait for these to come out, only question is should i get a laser tv or a oled?
4dvideos 3 years ago 2
funny how that works huh?
First LCD vs Plasma
Future Laser vs OLed
Decenium 3 years ago 2
wut about FED? thats the most brutal screen ive ever heard of to be coming soon!! (same as laser tv?? XP)
Maracachucho 3 years ago
FED is CRT but than compacter.
I still love CRT screens more than LCD or plasma but the Idea of Oled gets me more excited.
Decenium 3 years ago
Question is:
What do your eyes prefer nowadays? Plasma/LCD or RPTV?
Laser TV is the next step in RPTV, while OLED is the next step in fixed pixel displays...
Nomasain 3 years ago
ob das militär oder wer auch sonst erlauben wird, dass zivile Bürger farbige Laser im Besitz haben dürfen mit 3 stelliger Ausgangsleistung?
nero486 3 years ago
By all thats holy, I swear I will have one!
JohnnyFlash1965 3 years ago 2
now sony has to make a oled and laser tv if they get/loan the richts, to put their bravia pro engine into it and view fullhd etc,, programs on it to get the best possible image quality,were,re they waiting for.
johneymute 3 years ago
The OLED is boasting the possibility to go beyond Full HD, they're releasing a 27 inch model which has Full HD resolution; never before seen on a screen that isn't a monitor.
LessthanJake14 3 years ago
wait,,,here it comes,,,you heard it first,,I S O LINEAR LECS..YUP...ion/silicon/linear/light emitting/chip/set.....will make LCD,PLASMA,LASER &LED TVs a thing of the past just like 405 line B&W..soon ,very soon
audiofreeq 3 years ago
this technology changes so fast.
just to think i still have my CRT telly's
steviebboy69 3 years ago
when are Laser Tvs for sale
VEGAN0011 3 years ago
when was this aired?
KH2leon 3 years ago
just a question, what colors am i not seeing if im only seeing half the colors in real life??? badazz tv by the way
Adubz7777777 3 years ago
While your gaming the world as you know it passed you by,you spend half or more of your life infront of the tv thats why this is cool to most people. Its just something to blow your money on theirs allways something to blow your cash on who cares?
Aust40 3 years ago
Death of Plasma? I think not.
k9feces 4 years ago
Think so.
Jookel 4 years ago
Oled will kill them all =)
netkongen 3 years ago
Not if they only last 5,000 hours
k9feces 3 years ago
By the time Laser Tv and Oleds come, plasma will be a joke. And there will be a new competition. Laser vs OLED.
masenkosabo 3 years ago
By the time Laser Tv and Oleds come, plasma will be a joke. And there will be a new competition. Laser vs OLED.
masenkosabo 3 years ago
LASER VS SED VS OLED.
ravi1992 3 years ago
OLED, the contrast ratio is higher than anything in development at the minute by about x5 and the image quality is intense, the only thing is, it'll probably cost more, and they're still working on making it last. but certainly, plasma vs. LCD is old news
naryanr 3 years ago
thick and black + laser tv =a hell of a time
axeljrc8107 4 years ago
when they say next year wat year is that?
KH2leon 4 years ago
real mature.
TheWorldOfJames 4 years ago
wht games will it have by 2009 better one's then 3shitty
jamie6747 4 years ago
Shut up you sad SAD people.
TheWorldOfJames 4 years ago
you Shut up
jamie6747 4 years ago
what type of plasma is next to this tv in the demo is it ta vizio or something good like a pioneer how deep is it 12 inch deep lcd are a waste so if it that thic forget about it if only sony made a larger oled tv i think that will be better
reeferstar 4 years ago
Laser TV + MGS 4 + a hot b*tch + Beer = hell of a fun time
FReeStyLeMaSTeR 4 years ago
laser tv+x box 360=O YEA
h111kevin 4 years ago
Why nobody talk about the depth of this laser tv? Is it similar the depth of common rear projection type tv, about 24 inched depth. May be similar case as SED. The road for it is still long. May be needs more than 5 years less than ten years to see 2 inches depth laser tv in the market. So it just a strategy of Mitsubishi to stop people to buy LCD and Plasma panel for the moment. isn't it?
BBnose 4 years ago
ive heard that laser tvs are suppose to be about 8 inches in depth or so.
veryoldperson1 4 years ago
OK, seriously, what the hell does it matter if the thickness is 12" or so, if I can get a large,lets say 60-70" display that hsa many times better picture like color, black-level,brightness and response time (ie better then anything out there),do you really think I would care if the cabinet is 12-16" deep, you can't be serious, especially at the same price or even cheaper...
ohoglund 4 years ago
johnnie walker + call of duty 4 + laser tv = a great fukn time
hellanicfury 4 years ago 2
Malt Liquor + GTA 4 + Laser tv = a very good time.
sharedfolder38 4 years ago
lol
sgljungholm 4 years ago
Laser tv + Halo 3 + weed = a very very good time.
elite777 4 years ago 3